It’s been my dream for years

yeah, fuck conventional education

Covid and online lectures woulda been the perfect opportunity for it if we could have planned better

Schools are obsolete due to channels like this.

I will be using this video exactly as you describe in my lecture tomorrow 😊

I am glad you liked my video. Thanks.

I am glad my videos are helpful. More videos are on their way. Thanks.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky amazing how clear You are

@@EugeneKhutoryansky please make more videos on thermodynamics.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky I want to add my thanks - my goodness me this was a fantastic video!

@Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky You are the teacher the world needs in these times.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks.

hi omni i watch blackpenredpen, eddie woo and this channel.

@@aashsyed1277 good, we share things we love

@@omniyambot9876 oh wow

What blows my mind is how gases defy laws of motion, because the collisions between molecules do not loose energy of motion... when laws of physics state that energy is lost in collisions so two objects even with perfect rigidity so theres no frictional losses in deformation of the objects when colliding they still will eventually stop. But atoms defy this and more around bouncing off the container walls and each other without loosing or transferring any energy. By laws, atoms colliding with the container walls should transfer energy to the walls, and since the atoms are tiny in mass compared to the walls they would lose energy to the wall at a high rate, as more massive objects are barely moved when tiny objects strike them. With classical rules the molecules would lose energy to the walls and eventually stop moving, but this does not happen...ever...so how do they get to break the "laws"?? The atomic world breaks all the laws, but it's really too complicated for a chat window to get into...it really me as an chem. engr. that the atomic world and the macro world have two different sets of laws of physics whichcant apply to the other. If everything is made of atoms, should the laws governing atoms not also govern the objects built out of them?? Shouldnt constructed things not behave as the parts they are constructed from? This is like saying wood has laws and properties set to define how wold behaves, but a shed built out of wood has zero properties of the wood pieces and totally different set of laws describing the sheds properties and behavior.

Thanks for the compliments and thanks for recommending my videos. I am glad you like my videos.

I like the retro feel.

Thanks. I am glad that my videos are helpful. More videos are on their way.

Nice oneee! Hahaha

😂

🤣🤣🤣

Hiss.

I hear you. I'm sure there are many older viewers who weep silently as they watch Eugene's video playlist. (Same with 3Blue1Brown's channel.)

Thanks for the compliments.

This, 3b1b, and science clic are probably the best channels on KZfaq.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. It is actually other degrees of freedom that are primarily responsible for changes in the heat capacity with temperature: such as the vibrations between the atoms internal to the molecules, that kick in only at certain temperatures due to Quantum Mechanics. Thanks.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Indeed. That had become clear to me thanks to this video. Your videos do not explain concepts only explicitly, but also implicitly. Many of them are _really great!_ I often refer others to you.

Thanks.

I am glad you liked my video. Thanks.

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

I am glad that my videos are helpful. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad my video was helpful.

Thanks for the really great compliments. Derivatives of vector fields is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you like my videos.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky I must say your vidoes are amazing!!! Can you comment on my question . What can you say about these fragments in Conceptual Physics which I paste here in another comment? There is something wrong with these statements . How can be called tranasltional motion like ..."By translational we mean to-and-fro linear motion" Is it good definition? It rather refer to oscillation I think. Later we have "how fast the particles move as they vibrate and jiggle in place." - how can It be translational motion? How can you explain that this make sense and does not introduce confusion??

@@cielaczek81 An oscillation assumes that there is a state which the particle is attracted towards constantly as a returning position, like being pulled and pushed by a relatively static spring, where translational movement is unbounded, it is inertia and will only cease with another impulse. Two bonded atoms oscillate in the distance between each other, while their position in 3 dimensional space is their translational momentum.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.

Thanks for the compliments about my videos. I also have some long videos too. For example, my video on Maxwell's Laws is almost 50 minutes long. My video on Thermodynamics, referenced at the end of this video, is 36 minutes long. Thanks.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Ive watched them also, long is the wrong word considering the quantity of information and depth. My course takes atleast two weeks for each hour of your videos.

I am glad you like my animations. Thanks for the compliment.

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments about my videos.

Thanks for the compliments about my videos and I really appreciate your support on Patreon. Thank you.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad to have you as a subscriber. I hope you enjoy all my older videos.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad my visualization was helpful.

Thank you very much for the compliments.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you liked it.

I am glad you liked my video and that it answered your question. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad that my animations are helpful.

Thanks.

I am glad you liked my explanation. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you liked my video and explanation.

You are welcome and thanks.

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

I am glad my video is helpful. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks for the many compliments. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks for the compliment.

I am glad you liked my explanation. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment about my videos. I am glad that you like them.

I am glad you like my videos. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

I am glad my videos are helpful. Good luck on your exam. Thanks.

Thanks.

I am glad my video helped with the understanding. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment. Though, I don't use Blender. I make my 3D animations with "Poser." Thanks,.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

You are welcome and thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked it.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad my video was helpful.

Thanks.

Thanks.

In your scenario, prior to the collision, the energy has not yet equally distributed among all the different degrees of freedom. After the collision, some of the energy from the rotation has now been transformed into the kinetic energy of motion.

I've also been thinking of this scenario and, up to now, I have concluded that the addition of linear and rotational motions, which result in a more violent collision with the wall, is only half the story. There should also exist molecules hitting the wall whose rotation partly cancels their linear motion, thus leading to a net zero effect on average across all molecules in the system. Therefore, we can safely ignore the rotational component of motion when defining temperature. (I may be overlooking something, so by all means, correct me if I'm wrong).

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks for the really great compliments. I am glad you liked my video.