Thank you for the feedback, will try to show the full patches in the future!

Glad to hear that. Totally agree that the layout of all MN modules is just confusing, but they are so hands-on once you spend some time with them!

Thank you for the kind words!

Glad to hear the video helped! Yeah, I would say Arbhar and Morphagene are quite different to Mojave and Beads as Mojave and Beads focus on granular live processing whereas I normally use Arbhar and Morphagene with pre-made samples. Mixing 6 samples into one granular cloud is what stands out on the Arbhar for me, whereas the Morphagene will give you a very different flavour of sample slicing compared to the other 3. I think it comes down to how big your Eurorack case is, much you love the granular sound and if you can justify having a third granular engine.

@@TheSoundConvergence yeah all great points for sure. I'm in the process of trying to put together a compact 64HP ambient system, so space is limited. Likely gonna grab a uBurst to accompany Morphagene to still get that granular flavor while maintaining a small footprint. So many ways of doing things! Thanks again for the reply and the great video.

And actually, how are you creating that gate pattern?

@@wilhelm_yells Hi! Thanks for the kind words. I will try to incorporate more patch diagrams in the future :) The gate pattern of the main synth is a "bouncing ball patch" (not sure if thats the official name): One looping envelope with its release time modulated by a second envelope. In the beginning the release time is short so many envelopes are triggered, the longer the release time becomes, less envelopes will be triggered. Make Noise Maths is an easy module to set this up with / I am actually explaining this gate sequence in more detail in my next video coming out end of the week :)

@@TheSoundConvergence fabulous! Yes have seen this patch long ago. I’ll try this again! Keep up the great work

Glad it helped!

I have a Morphagene, but I don't have an Arbhar. You did a great job clarifying their strengths and differences. Plus you present some nice Morphagene techniques.

Totally, Arbhar is in regular mode (not follower mode) and the intensity is set to 0. In the patch a gate triggers 2 envelopes, the first envelope is controlling a VCA and with that the volume of my main synthesizer. The second envelope is set up to increase Arbhars intensity value once envelope 1 is falling and we can barely hear the synth anymore. So in the patch you will hear either main synth or Arbhar at a time. It is call and response because whenever the main synth is playing it is also recorded into the Arbhar (you can see the record button is on at those times), so when it is Arbhars time to play, it will repeat and granularize the synthesizer phrase just heard, thus call and response. Hope that helps!

Hard to tell. It really depends what you want to use them for. Neither will replace proper techno drums, for example. Both modules play back samples so you if put in suitable samples, Arbhar will make textures that fit techno, and the Morphagene can do similar things as well. Neither works great with (bpm) clock input both both can be sent gate triggers into to trigger samples exactly on the beat or timings you want. That works.

@@TheSoundConvergence thank you