Morphogenetic Fields & The Astral World

  Рет қаралды 2,497

OntologicalOdyssey

OntologicalOdyssey

24 күн бұрын

Explore the fascinating parallels between Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphogenetic fields and the concept of the astral world. Discover how both frameworks challenge traditional materialistic views, proposing non-physical influences that shape our reality. Delve into the idea of interconnectedness, collective memory, and the convergence of science and spirituality in understanding life and consciousness.
For more information about Morphic Resonance: amzn.to/3LqsNuA

Пікірлер: 35
@redmoondesignbeth9119
@redmoondesignbeth9119 21 күн бұрын
The Visuals are beautiful. I've followed Sheldrake"s work for many years and it makes my life easier.
@mmedeuxchevaux
@mmedeuxchevaux 21 күн бұрын
A gentle suggestion: next time could you turn down the music?
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 21 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for the feedback ❤️
@markcollins1577
@markcollins1577 21 күн бұрын
Ummm... would Rupert agree with your statement at 1 minute and 13 seconds? We are finding 'morphogenetic fields ' to be very much entwined with genes and biochemistry and already worked out thousands of ways this may be so... I like Rupert's ideas and do not want his idea to be misconstrued. We see morphogenetic fields as one example of how the Universe is likely intelligent.
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 21 күн бұрын
If you want accurate information you should read scientific papers in academic journals. Here, on this channel, we are more interested in exploring ideas. For example, putting two concepts, like morphogenetic fields and the ancient idea of the astral plane, next to each other in order to see which parallels might exist. This videos is not a proof it is an open ended speculative hypothesis.
@Formscapes
@Formscapes 21 күн бұрын
​@@OntologicalOdyssey this person was questioning the specific statement made at 1:13 not the premise of the video. As far as I can tell Sheldrake would agree with what you said, but that's beside the point. You should never, EVER qualify your claims by saying that you aren't holding yourself to standards of accuracy. If you can't be accurate and also explore ideas, then you need to find another shtick, because you clearly aren't cut out for doing anything that anyone should be taking seriously. You need to have the spine to make dam sure that you can back up what you are saying before you say it. Deferring to academic journals as though they are more accountable than you is a laughably bad look.
@erniemajor
@erniemajor 21 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for doing this!
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 20 күн бұрын
Thank you ❤️
@cicerogsuphoesdown7723
@cicerogsuphoesdown7723 21 күн бұрын
*sigh* when a bunch of materialists run a full court press telling the public that the world is a series of meaningless physical permutations over aeons for decades only to accidentally stumble upon the activity of the logos, and shamelessly peddle it as if it’s some ‘breakthrough’ and not what people have been saying for thousands of years. Complete arrogance and lack of accountability.
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 21 күн бұрын
I agree, we just published a video about the logos :)
@MasoudJohnAzizi
@MasoudJohnAzizi 20 күн бұрын
Indeed.. *sigh*. The mind that suffers from materialism/physicalism is a mind that suffers from narcissism (that which Dr. Iain McGilchrist refers to as left-brain dominant thinking).
@ordinarypete
@ordinarypete 20 күн бұрын
Say that in a dumb way for people like me who feel this situation happening but don’t understand how to describe it. Plz.
@MasoudJohnAzizi
@MasoudJohnAzizi 20 күн бұрын
@@ordinarypete The works of Dr. Iain McGilchrist upon "the psychological roots of the modern metacrisis" may be helpful for thee..
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 20 күн бұрын
Interesting! I always tell people that there is a reason why you have two brains and that it is one’s task to think with both at the same time. For example, a photo of your child is a symbol of love AND color particles on piece of paper. Things are physical and metaphysical or rational and irrational at the same time.
@miketierney7510
@miketierney7510 18 күн бұрын
I have always said chemistry is the effect not the cause of creation. Thought directs energy and energy directs manifestation of life.
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 17 күн бұрын
Definitely, the physical laws of nature have to come after creation was initiated by something or someone.
@andrescaballero2970
@andrescaballero2970 21 күн бұрын
Love all of this ❤
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 21 күн бұрын
Thank you, that means a lot ❤️
@cavemancaveman5190
@cavemancaveman5190 20 күн бұрын
NVM Mars core removal changed electromagnetism throughout the local area changing life on earth permanently? Perhaps it is reversible!!!!
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 20 күн бұрын
I think electromagnetism has a huge influence on the development of biological organisms. If the fields shift it probably has an effect on all forms of life.
@cavemancaveman5190
@cavemancaveman5190 20 күн бұрын
@@OntologicalOdyssey with so much to consider perhaps we should take it slow. Electromagnetism has been my trade fourty years and running
@ericroman9126
@ericroman9126 20 күн бұрын
If you want to see the Aether. Work with the sri yantra and microdose psilocybin. Plop yourself in a recliner with a poster of the yantra 4 ft from you. Stare into the bindu and enjoy the show. EXCEPT .... the show is not the Aether. It's microadjusting your eyes. After about 45 minutes take your gaze off the poster and look into the space around you. You'll see the Aether. The yantra (machine) is tuning your harmonic sympathetic phase.
@MasoudJohnAzizi
@MasoudJohnAzizi 20 күн бұрын
How do you know that was Aether that you saw?
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 20 күн бұрын
Are the different types of yantras for different things to see?
@ericroman9126
@ericroman9126 20 күн бұрын
Try it. I beg you to. But to answer your question I really don't know. I'm assuming because it is because of numerous descriptions I've read. It surrounds me in every direction. It has an undulating movement. It is nearly transparent with a light blue shimmer. I've tried many times to interact or coax it but it never reacts to me. I've tried chanting, crystals, electromagnetism , single pointed concentration, and other spiritual practices but nothing. At first I was introduced to it with the help of entheogens and the yantra but now I can witness it unaided.
@ericroman9126
@ericroman9126 20 күн бұрын
@@OntologicalOdyssey I've worked with the shree yantra in the protocol I mentioned above about 7 times. Each and every time I come to see it, the aether/the shimmer. But what is beautiful to me is ayahuasca brought me the same result. For the summer of 2022 I worked for an ayahuasca church. We journeyed every weekend. I'd say at least 4 times I saw the aether, but without the yantra. The same undulating shimmering sea of energy. Referring back to your question, only once did I work with another drawing. It was a Tibetan mandala. I did not give it much time or effort with that one but I'd venture to say yes different yantras different outcome.
@ericroman9126
@ericroman9126 20 күн бұрын
I hope my comment reaches the many. Especially psychonauts who have a science background. You don't need to take a large dose. The yantra does the work. Each and every time once I take my gaze off the poster, I am able to see it. I first got in to it because for a while I was researching terms like resonance and frequency. I used to practice mantra but wasn't getting any where with that. Then one day it occurred to me there is frequency in still photos, the yantras. The frequency of sacred geometry. Specifically the equilateral triangle. But more so that yantra has phi built in too. I hope some one tries it. Remember you don't need a large dose. ty
@hithere7080
@hithere7080 20 күн бұрын
this some 999 ahh shit
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 19 күн бұрын
We have a video about synchronicity as well, if that’s what you are implying.
@rursus8354
@rursus8354 10 күн бұрын
The theory has insufficient empirical support, of too low quality. It isn't taken seriously by scientists.
@OntologicalOdyssey
@OntologicalOdyssey 10 күн бұрын
There is world beyond science and empirical knowledge. Not everything is or has to be rational and objective.
Government Breaks Silence: Strange Encounters | UFO's Investigating the Unknown
42:14
НРАВИТСЯ ЭТОТ ФОРМАТ??
00:37
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
The ultimate FUTURE FAKE
11:31
DoctorRamani
Рет қаралды 2,9 М.
Astral Projection | How to Have an Out of Body Experience
15:01
RosalieYoga
Рет қаралды 609 М.
The Ultimate Guide to 10x Better Sleep (tonight)
38:39
Escaping Ordinary (B.C Marx)
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
The Esoteric Secrets of Plato’s Cave & the Truth Beyond the Simulation
45:25
THIRD EYE DROPS with Michael Phillip
Рет қаралды 540 М.
What Is The Biggest Thing In The Universe?
56:12
History of the Universe
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
What Came Before The Big Bang?
1:01:23
History of the Universe
Рет қаралды 527 М.
This Will Give You Goosebumps - Alan Watts on Death
13:34
True Meaning
Рет қаралды 557 М.
What Is (Almost) Everything Made Of?
1:25:49
History of the Universe
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН