yeah here I am shooting for 600, makes me feel a little boring.

😂😂

pssssh my uncle's friend's dishwasher makes 750. He used to give people rides on it, and put a hundred dollar bill on the back, and he would say "son you can have that 100 bucks if you can grab hold of it in the middle of an aggressive power wash cycle." *adjusts boomer jeans and laughs to myself* Nobody ever did get that hundred bucks. Sheeee-oooot. Jangle muh spurs! : p

@@jacobl6714 😂😂

😂😂😂😂😳

Richard lives the next town up from me. Real nice guy and very knowledgeable. He made boring High School classes more entertaining reading his magazine articles.

2017

Now they make over 12000

Very excellent. Honest as well. Not advertising 20 thousand dollar engines

Yeah agreed but homeboy talks to much

Absolutely 👍

Who would've ever thought a big block would make more power than a small block 🤯

Well, depending on your application, exhaust scavenging can be an excellent alternative that doesn't require a 'heavy' pump and the associated wiring. I think the moral of your story is just to pull a vacuum on your crankcase. If so, my sentiments exactly.

Old Roadkill?

Anything is better than bad chad 🤮

You

8

Just watch Richard holdner videos. He's 10 times better than engine masters

Lolllll none of these guys ever drove this amount of power lmao!!!they jump and scream when they run high 11s...i laugh because im just a second away from their ET with a stock honda engine hahahah

Where I need more of this 🤣

@@haydenmadigan8186 Richard Holdener youtube channel. It's a deep rabbit hole of dyno tests. Amazing info for LS stuff.

He is the man

@@Jr_5646 not just ls stuff he has small block and big block fords olds Buick’s caddy in line 6 man does everything

@@Tripledoffroadbbq Yea, I know. He has Honda B and K series engine videos too. Dude's a legend. LS/LT stuff is my lane, so I guess that's why I focus on that.

Lol 30 runs? Maybe a 3000 and 4000 hp

Hate to break it to ya but he’s done well over 1500 on a stocker 😅.

1.6l 3 cylinders pushing 300hp

@@crazeguy26 or 2.0 pushing 600...

My 2.4 makes 160ish, Toyota?

My l4 2.4l Toyota makes 142hp at the crank stock, but its has mods on it now, Yeee!!😁

Personally I blame squirrels , that dude is indeed awesome . It's amazing the amount of hours he dedicates to putting out videos . Very cool

Yep. kzfaq.info/love/8uf_zVTV63l1-uRSx6XbnQ

@@unclesquirrel6951 yea I was hoping he would also get a show on motortrend at one point he said he'd start selling ls cams as well I'm excited for that

@@Dannymclovin I legitimately am routing for the dude ,he's definitely puts in the hours

the thing needs to be huge to compensate something like 2000Liters of air per second warming up tens of degrees at that rate. That thing melts ice like crazy. Think how long the warm water needs to be in a huge refridgerator, to get back to ice? You need like a 100horsepower refridgerator, which is going to maybe add power afterall, but its going to be bigger than a roots blower, and need more coolant than the ice-bucket. Neither is good for endurance racing, ice is pretty good for drag/topspeed stuff. Endurance guys need to deal with ambient-air-intercoolers

Better quality lifters

An 8.3 cummins might, I really doubt you could make a 5.9 hold up long enough to spool that much

1050 on a 582 is street car stuff.

1050s are for small blocks twin 1250 is more like it.... Or 16 1100 CC injectors... And 30lbs boost... Got BOOST... You should have!

@Leroy Baker this is why God made intercoolers!

That's called twincharged

@@xmo552 fiat/labia called it volumex

@@fooman2108 For a sec I thought I read fat labia 😂

@@xmo552 😂🤣👈 lol you crazy..and and seeing things.

N.A. is 1 Bar, double N.A. pressure your at 2 Bar.

If I would hazard a guess race fuel. Maybe e85.

@@bmstylee I'm curious of just that, e85 or what race fuel.

@@DannyO0917 110 octane maybe.

@@bmstylee makes sense, likely leaded gas vs what we find in modern set up where e85 is the best choice when we have o2 sensors etc

582 cubic inches or 9.5 liters

What makes a pro charger the best?

I think 4.125 bore and 3.25 stroke

@@indyrock8148 that was my thoughts too. I did a bore/stroke calculator, and that's yeah... I can't imagine anyone running a Little M block and "not" taking advantage of the bore capacity, regardless of stroke. Myself, I would have opened it up to at least 4.165. Max bore I believe is 4.185 on the Little M. Thnx..😎✌️

@@aumetalmental8403 the full episode is on MTOD and that's what he says

I agree i would love to see someone do something with all I think 496 cubic inches

@@johnbasden5718 there are waaaaaaay too many of them out there to be forgotten or overlooked by the community....Plus they have the same basic architecture as a standard LS but we have so little information about what interchanges and what doesnt becaus so few people have done these experiments for us.....and theres no way you or I could afford to experiment with $15 grand worth of stuff just to see what happens ! Thank God for sponsors !!!! Right @Richardholder ! LOL

Guys put them in their hot rods and fold rods stock

@C03 EVERYTHING USED BY CHEVY IN RACING TODAY IS ALL FORD BASED FROM THE R07 NASCAR ENGINE TO THE DRCE PROSTOCK ENGINE TO ALL THE SYMETRICAL HEAD RACING ENGINES TO THE MOUNTAIN MOTORS. I WILL START WITH THE LS HEAD. PUT YOUR FINGER INTO A LS HEAD THEN INTO A FORD WINDSOR HEAD AND THE INTAKE RUNNER CURVES INTO THE INTAKE VALVE WHICH IS A SPIRAL INDUCING COMBUSTION CHAMBER. THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME AND ITS A FORD DESIGN. THE WINDSOR HEAD VALVE WAS STRAIGHTER FOR BETTER FLOW AT 20 DEGREES. AND GM TOOK IT TO 18 DEGREES. THE LS HEAD IS ALSO ,BASED ON THE FORD 427 HIGH RISER ENGINE WHERE THE INTAKE RUNNERS ARE RAISED UP GIVING THE AIRFLOW A STRAIGHT SHOT INTO THE CYLINDER, ANOTHER FORD ENGINEERED DESIGN. THE LS ALSO HAS A ANGLE PLUG LIKE A FORD. IT ALSO USES THE KIDNEY SHAPE COMBUSTION CHAMBER OF THE FORD 427 HIGH RISER WHICH DATES BACK TO THE 1960-1 HI-PER FORD 390. YOU CAN SIT SCREAMING BANGING YOUR SPOON ON YOUR HIGH CHAIR DENYING THE LS IS ALL FORD IN DESIGN. BUT IT WILL NEVER CHANGE THE FACT OF WHAT CHEVY DID TAKING DESIGNS FROM FORD. NEXT WE WILL GO ON TO THE BLOCK.

@@Frank289100 Why did you bother asking? Also, your caps lock is on.

@C03 YOU GIVEN ME NOTHING HERE BUT NELSON RACING ENGINES? SAW THAT 2 YEARS AGO ABOUT THE LS AND EVEN COMMENTED ON IT, BUT IT SEEMS THEY REMOVED BY COMMENT TO HIDE THE TRUTH.

@C03 ALSO SAW THAT KATECH VIDEO BUT YOU STILL HAVEN'T GIVEN ME ANYTHING. SO HERE IS ANOTHER QUESTION: GIVE ME 1 ONE DESIGN ASPECT IN THE LS THAT CAME FROM THE OLD SMALL BLOCK CHEVY. DON'T COME BACK WITH THE BULLSHIT, TELLING ME THE ROD BEARING ARE THE SAME AND ALSO THE PUSHRODS. I WANT A DESGN ASPECT TAKEN FROM THE OLD SMALL BLOCK CHEVY THAT LIVES IN THE LS?

@@mattteee2973 HERE IS A QUESTION FOR YOU MATT: WHY DID CHEVY SCRAP IT'S CONVENTIONAL ENGINE DESIGN AND REPLACE IT WITH ANOTHER CONVENTIONAL DESIGN TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL?

He's Boomer AF.

@@lucysmith4242 Better than millennial af

Better go draw your water out of the well then.

@Brayden Brayden So by that reasoning why dont you go swap in a 1000hp 1 cyl or go electric/hybrid? You'll be able to soon. U down? What I'm talking about is the old school where you create something not just dial up a parts list. I know efi is better. I don't want better. I want visceral and mechanical.

@@xmo552 I'm loyal to speed for performance. If I can electric swap and go faster cheaper, then ya boy Gon be pulling up in an electric swapped Nova