Your malicious and unfounded accusations towards the Critical Drinker and Nerdrotic are not forgotten.

@@damonpowell8443 well i forgot about it till now thanks for reminding me stupid

@@jimbo9208 cope and seethe Looper simp 👋

@@damonpowell8443stfu nobody cares

Yes, I walked out of 'Avengers Endgame.'

Translating.... "if you have a view that does not align with mine it is hateful. If you do not worship the ground me and the groups I represent and is offended on behalf of and DARE have ANY critical opinions regarding individuals of [enter protected group] regardless of reasons it is bigotry"

Too many old men were engaging in lewd acts during that film.

I agree. I really liked the first one

@@patriciafenwick5846 Yep and Mr Cage was perfect for the role!

​@@ricardohendricks1711 #2 gave you a whole lot more of Ghost Rider but the story was weak.

@@fyreleomh1896 100% agreed yes. I like that the tone was a bit darker as well but it took away from the campiness that fits Nicolas Cage's personality so well.

well i forgot about it till now thanks for reminding me stupid

​@@jimbo9208cope and seethe Looper simp 👋

@@damonpowell8443 looper is right

@@damonpowell8443 you who followed critical drinker, were incompetent and share the same breyn sells

@@damonpowell8443 imagine following a guy who criticize a film he didn't watch and doesn't like and milks a content out of it, and the audacity to defend a guy you sound more like a simp.

I agree about the morbious movie. There are some parts of it that could have been done better perhaps but all in all I quite enjoyed the movie. Haven't seen the flash movie yet so can't comment on that 1.

I personally liked Max Steel. Not sure why and how it did poorly. In fact, i know quite a few people who also liked it so I'm not sure what the issue was with it underperforming at the box office. In terms of the Flash, I liked that movie as well. I didn't pay attention or care about the personal controversy surrounding Ezra Miller and was able to enjoy the movie. I don't believe that one actor's personal issues should derail an entire film that was made through the efforts of a whole cast and crew.

@@theturnup9671 I agree 100% about what you said about The Flash.

We were trying to forget Clooney as Batman.

Supergirl didn't even look like Supergirl.

back to black was not

are you serious lol were you expecting that movie to be a massive hit? It wasnt as bad as all the hate but if you honestly thought mean one was gonna be good thats on you lmao

Michael Mann not Michael Bay

@@maxmazzotti6651 Michael Myers

They had all that money and that crappy ass CGI and shitty way of explaining and physically representing multiverse travel like they did.

Cry more.

They were deserved at film critics who are bigots and narcissists online, especially Nerdrotic

No

@@marvelsProtege YES

@@kazafridi2029 again the facts are in my side just because you like it doesn't make it good

@@marvelsProtege well that’s your opinion not mine and not for so many like me who liked/loved it

@@kazafridi2029 it is not my opinion it's a fact and more people didn't like it than did but you saying it's amazing too is the joke of all jokes

"Shall I watch a video with open mind? oh no someone I do not like made it. I am gonna be mad about it, make a comment about me being mad about it to pretend I am such a much better person while I am just commenting for the attention. give me likes pls"

@@ReicantheJester nah. I'm saying "Should I be giving them money until they redact their false statements?" Most of their videos are well made and enjoyable. I just don't know if I should support a company that dirty deletes libelous claims without making a statement about their egregious lies.

@@ReicantheJester As KZfaq viewers, we must remember our views equal money, however minute.

there not how are they doing that

​@@jimbo9208 sarcastic remark to this channel since looper said the same to other critics

@@SlickRickDownSouth what are you talking about

@@jimbo9208 Hes talking about how the critique given to star wars the acolyte by nerdrotic and the critical drinker was deemed to encourage hatred and bigotry by looper, wich was an absurd statement and completely ruined loopers credibility.

Imma update you real quick on this and answer your question. Nobody is encouraging "hate and bigotry". 1: criticism, disagreement, disappointment or any form of annoyance with someone is not "hate" I see so many morons ( subjective, but not hateful) who toss out buzzzwords like "bigotry, hate, racism, sexism, yiddi yiddi yadda yadda" while at the same time putting themselves on a pedestal in their own heads. But if either of these people bothered to actually be honest with themselves and dare to form any kind of critical thought and make sure that they use words they thoroughly understand, then you would find that a lot of online conversations would end up being far more civilized than "I do not like your view, BIGOT BIGOT BIGOT!!!! REEEEE! DO NOT TALK BACK THAT IS HATE! DO NOT SAY I AM WRONG THAT MAKES YOU A NAZI!" It is honestly quite pathetic honestly. And no, harsh words do not equal hate either. 2: lot of these film makers and directors today have no love or care whatsoever for the movies they produce, or rather, they do not care about any source material, previous installments or its fans. They see the movies and series as an opportunity to toss in their own egocentric agendas, spewing toxicity towards critics who dare call them out on their arrogance warpath and as a means to do weird self inserts where they rather change set characters to fit their own narrow thinking rather than endulging in the franchise, getting to understand and learn about the characters and see the reasons as to why some things are the way they are and maybe have some passion to create an interesting and entertaining story. Some of which have even admitted they do changes to cater to a so-called "modern audience" as they say it and sometimes even spew shit like "hey original fanbase of [enter franchise] this new entry to it is NOT FOR YOU! if you watch it and do not like what we have done to the franchise you love, TOO BAD! SUCK IT!" Then afterwards they wail about how the old fanbase is so bigoted for not practically worshipping their egocentrically directed product. 3: People asking directors to respect the franchise they have had handed to them and that asking them to please acknowledge the source material pre-existing prior to their overtaking of said franchise is not people "stuck in a box" nor is it bigoted. Examples to this. Triss Merigold in the Witcher franchise, great actress but she was given the wrong role. Now people would respond to that with "uuuugh!!!! RACISM!!!! REEE! INTOLERANT NAZIS" and whatnot. No, it was people asking to honor previously established content and that rather shoehorning her as Triss for DEI reasons. Why not instead create a new character to have said actress portray? It is not bigoted or hateful regardless how people try to squeal that out. It is simply a plea to honor pre-established content. If their excuse would be "oh there weren't any darkskinned people in the Witcher so we had to replace someone to get it in" it would be a total lie, as Zerrikanians were literally just that, then you got Ofier which is more Arabic like. However Triss was Temerian. When you make content from a franchise with established lore, characters or otherwise existing content, changing it to fit a narrative not only push original fans away it also opens a room for toxic bullshit both between trolls who want to stir shit and deluded people who's only ability in life is to be offended on other peoples behalf and scream "far right, nazis, racists, bigots" etc. non stop and not contribute anything to the discussions, which in turn pushes the last few fans both old and new ones whom happened to either not mind the changes or have no insight in previously established characters. People would react the same if you had some pudgy white guy portray Blade. And what about Jake Gyllenhaal in Prince of Persia? How is criticism to that not hateful then, when it is the exact same reasoning behind the criticism?

@@markthomas6236 bot