Compare this to all the Disney behind the scenes fluff that seems almost as scripted as the films themselves.

This was a very well spoken statement

I’m sure these documentaries will be viewed 100 years from now in movie making colleges

I think it comes from Lucas's background in and love for documentary.

That’s what a documentary is technically. It’s interesting because of the surprise value. You are curious to know more about it.

Frank Smith yeah, R.I.P

Yeah

18:26

I could listen to his voice all day. RIP.

Guy had a hell of a voice on him. Im not sure there has ever been a human speaking voice that sounded more distinguished or had such a presence.

techically they rocks, as prequels they sucks

nobody hates them anymore haven't you been keeping up

@@justinsane3909 try harder.. no shot you just watched a 50min docc to come to that conclusion and brain dead comment

@@justinsane3909 Imagine being enough of a retarded loser to exist in a world that has Disney Star Wars and you still have an active hard-on against the prequels

@@robertraya7978No, they’re still generally disliked. The number of apologists has increased since the sequels but common, household consensus has not changed.

You spelt fear wrong.

@@MrParkerman6 Nah, fuck off.

But in so they lost the love of the craft and work hard to please the wrong person, rather than the people.

​@@Meg_Lovegood No, they didn't lose the "love of the craft". Stop making shit up. And no, they didn't please the "wrong person", they worked hard to please the only right person, the visionary and creator of Star Wars, George Lucas. "The people", and RLM betrayed Lucas, and are mostly responsible for irrational hate towards Prequels, and responsible for Lucas quitting Star Wars and selling it to Di$ney, who also betrayed George and took a big dump over Star Wars saga.

Zylar Adama I think it’s evident from all of the prequel BTS that these movies were not a collaborative effort or a typical filmmaking environment. Our pal Evergreen here is just making a conclusion based on what they have seen. If you think that the job of the crew is solely to “please the only right person” I think you misunderstand what the process of filmmaking is like and may be putting George on a pedestal.

subtle cup holder ok.

I do too. I guess it's like trying to salvage a lesson from it all or something? or where did it all go wrong? i do watch documentaries like seconds from disaster and Mayday investigate, reminds me of that!ha

It's a true addiction

I just got hooked. Been 5 days =(

I think it's just "making of" videos. I watch a bunch of theses for a lot of movies, some of which I have never seen before.

yep u have to look no further than jar jar. he was originally gonna have big parts in 2 and 3 as well but Lucas minimised his role greatly as the films went on cause he knew fans didn't like him.

Wush & Boon stupid normie bitch, you're missing the big picture He's so invested in CREATING CHARACTERS, and MAKING THEIR LOOKS, but doesn't put the same amount of effort in editing/script writing

@@smellmyclock He'd make a great animation director. Not so good at everything else...

Mo Luj And that is when he should not have listened. I thought Jar Jar provided great comic relief his antics are what I think about and look at during the dark action and painful scenes. That is why I would not have wanted Jar Jar be the bad guy. Another Gungan should have been a traitor, so that we who laughed at and liked Jar Jar could have been sad and sympathizes with his sadness at seeing one of his species betray the Jedi.

smellmyclock Criticizing his editing/script writing is so pointless when you do not give examples of such. Also you need to consider the fact that you and others just did not bother to think about the lines or do research to find similar lines in movies that are well thought of for their editing and/or writing. Movies such as the Jennifer Jones/Joseph Cotton movies.

Now if the great Christopher Lee is saying he is fine with CGI so he can be in this movie, there is no validity to his fans complaint that they "just don't like it". His fans should should have been happy to see him and been understanding that, despite his physical limits he still wanted to do whatever possible to be in this movie.

Saruman and Count Dooku, two iconic characters in two of the greatest franchises ever made.

Joe Benz don’t forget Dracula!

Me too

@@joebenzz don't forget Mr. Scaramanga

Juan-Luis Sanchez that's awesome man

Juan-Luis Sanchez all downhill from there eh?

Amazing! Full respect man! Felicidades!

Locke3OOO asshole.. Envy is a pathetic response.

Locke3OOO stupid kid

I think 'Pensive' was the word he was looking for

That was actually my main complain about Yoda in the Prequels. He always looks depressed and sad compared to The Empire Strikes Back where he was funny and positive. I am also not the biggest fan of Yoda fighting with a lightsaber.

@@CaughtInTheLoop I was ok with it because they always presented the lightsaber as "a Jedi's weapon" Maybe it could have been executed a little better, but I thought that using the force to be a powerful jedi warrior when typically see you as a feeble old man was kind of awesome. And he's small, of course his still would be mad fast. But like I said, the execution could have been a little bit better. People have problems with Yoda and Palpatine with sabers because they see them as these mystical beings "beyond trivial toys" (maybe not you, but I've seen that type of opinion before) but Lucas always explicitly said all Jedi had sabers, why would Yoda be different? I could maybe understand why it's weirder for Palpatine to have a saber though

As a VFX film animator myself, it's 100% accurate.

Jonas Music he was more serious back then

Something i guess children don't do than?

George has a great eye for talent, he always surrounded himself with the best people.

Sounds like he was the Mr. Rogers of filmmaking

The journey begins much earlier than the prequels. Star Trek II and IV, Young Sherlock Holmes, The Abyss (first photorealistic CG integrated into a scene), then T2, then Jurassic Park (photorealistic creatures). By 1993 it had been established firmly as a viable effects tool. ILM then used the SW special editions as a ramp-up for the level of ambition that Lucas had in mind for the prequels.

lolok

and 95% of it still looks like garbage

"Every movie you love today that has heavy CG" of which there's been zero since....what, The Lord of the Rings?

@@sirpancherto Just like you then, asswipe

On that table we also see Wat Tambor’s design. So cool to see how these characters started

Working there sounds great

Jim Carrey averages 4.

He also has the record for tallest leading actor

He did a lot of Shakespeare, so he was pretty much a trained swordsman lol

@@leftyfourguns He also did some batshit things as a soldier

Yeah he seemed to put a lot of thought into it! What color is Yodas blood George? It's green right....

Like a mirror image, which one was George I can’t tell

That's so messed up.. lol

Not enough Chen's

@@Meg_Lovegood Chen Lucas his half asian brother

+MegaBlackhawk12 hahaha

George should have given them a copy of that footage and said to animate the exact look on their faces

eyE ehT steeM nahT eroM

if i was George i would fire them

Timestamp?

I cast Ultima. Then, Renzokuken Lion Heart.

so baby Yoda eating frogs is cannibalism

he also calls lightsabers laser swords and duels sword battles. half the fans would go nerd crazy if any normal person said that.

@Luis Martinez George Lucas was the chief editor on the original Star Wars. He oversaw the entire process and edited the acclaimed gunport sequence himself. His wife Marcia only edited a third of the movie and left to work on another movie before the final edit was even completed. There were two other editors who edited the other 2/3 of the movie. The notion that Lucas had nothing to do with the editing of the original movie, that he's a terrible editor, or that his wife singlehandedly saved from the movie from him--it's all a myth.

+Sebastian Cubillejo (FilmStrife) Dexter is a sith too! but seriolusly I had to rewind just to make sure I did hear George say "hes the key"..... again

+FilmStrife what does that mean?

Hildebert plinkett reference

+FilmStrife He did jack shit in that film.

- He is the Key - What's his personality? (5:20) - Emmmm...we haven't quite yet....

I was there when AOTC released, it wasn't a good reception for this one either.

@@deku812 im not talking about the quality of the movie itself. im talking about the behind the scenes work that allows every major studio today to pump out CGI heavy movies. Wouldnt be possible without ILM and Lucas pushing the envelope with CGI

“A special effect is a tool, a means of telling a story. A special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing.” -George Lucas

ironman aint even a great movie dafuq u americans with marvel stuff

@@Cortesevasive im not american matey

It's great. It's gonna be great. It's gonna be great. It's great.

"He's the key" is almost like a Jinx, after Jar Jar.

Zoomer30 why is this 5 year old comment getting activity now

are you guys really so stupid that you can't hear the sarcasm in george's voice? I swear any excuse to criticize the guy that created Star Wars you will take

Hey, there's nothing wrong with soy boys! Not everyone can be like Christopher Lee!

He was so good in LOTR as well. He was a huge fan of the books and read them every year. RIP you magnificent bastard.

Dude was one of the most badass human beings ever. He accomplished so much in his life, being an actor was just the icing on top. Look up his Wikipedia page and just be amazed. RIP to the great Sir Christopher Lee.

Been in several bad films but is never bad in them.

Disney+ has all these

@@ThisIsCreation-FollowOnTwitter disney doesnt get my money

@@sunkintree I didn't ask

@@ThisIsCreation-FollowOnTwitter It was more fun discovering them on the bonus disc. Those old DVDs overwhelmed you with content.

+DangerDan what does he mean by that?

+Los Sambrero Lucas thinks that everyone will be in awe of the CGI creatures, but in reality, they are so childish and stupid as characters, on ly children like them. He thinks they'll have the same impact of the T-Rex in Jurassic Park.

+Mario Moreno So, you fellows think CGI means nothing? You think these guys and Matrix, Lord of the Rings etc created these methods for no reason and for ill only? Well, you can throw out every sci-fi TV show and movie with any realism, forget everything action from 2000 onwards. Of course CGI is key, it seems like nothing now and if it is overused then it ruins a movie - of course CGI alone is hopeless, but at the time, there was no such thing really, but the difference between CGIC and puppets is ground breaking.

+The Anti-Theist It WAS overused in this movie.

Metal Gamer Well, naturally it would be, I think the movie is good nonetheless, also, it is overused in every movie - and most movies are bad used or not, Star Wars is good used or not, that's the difference.

For real! Dexter Jester as he appears in the film is completely down to the input of John Knoll who saw some interesting possibilities with the gullet on the one particular model. 4:40

Well said, my friend, and thank you! :)

+planetaaronx Uh, in Wat world was lord of the rings fucked up?!?! It still stands as one of the greatest trilogies ever made...

And you can’t get the awesome acrobatics with a puppet

i also like junkfood better than real food

It probably was to hard to control as a puppet i like the cgi

I'd show up in a ballet costume for the rest of my life if I had that amount of "fuck you money" ...

How does never changing anything about himself make him a legend?

@@Duzykutas he's found his true self, man

@@nicolascamargo4514 Well, that's just like, your opinion man.

I mean yeah, they're the ones he trusted to bring his vision to life. For as much as he directs them in the nuances of things, he's just as content to sit back and let them do what they do best. Pioneering the future of special effects, he'd kind of have to.

I didn't see one point where he didn't put his input in, on a scene.... So i don't think he really gave them real freedom to create on their behalf

@@nicksGLI Creative freedom doesn't necessarily mean to do what ever you want and it'll make it in. It means to do whatever you want within certain boundaries or guidelines. George is absolutely a micromanager, but to the degree of observing whether or not his staff's tastes can line up with his, or at least meet his halfway.

+Fastmagnum004 It's funny how Lucas pronounces his character's name at 6:58 He almost says it like "doe-ku" or something lol.

+Deathbrewer "goongas"

RIP Christopher Lee (1922-2015)

u gay

@@1984rockabilly no u

It's very common in projects to use generic names for understanding better, video games projects are also an example

Goongas is another one.

+Jack DeRoche Lol it looks like N64 graphics

+Krisb BeatS They aren't showing the completed graphics in many of the shots - only the shell before texture is added, as they stated.

+Krisb BeatS So, you've not seen the movies then? Of course they were not the best at the time, these methods were newly created let us not forget, and I can assure you, Yoda is ten times better in the new ones, he was rather laughable in the old ones. Both sets are good movies and for the most part 1, 2 and 3 are much better.

The Anti-Theist You're crazy dude. I've seen all 7 and Yoda is 100x better in Empire Strikes Back than any of the prequels, hence why Empire is regarded the best film of the franchise

Krisb BeatS Well, this must be the dimensional die-hard fan within you speaking since I just watched all seven, Yoda can hardly move and his voice and laughter is horrible, the swamp scene is not as I remembered as a child - it's just not good enough, I then watched Yoda's fight scene, now that is better! I have no idea what methods you are using to judge the two, but I would suggest you are the crazy one here.

The new ones do it in all the wrong ways! Lucas never altered the story so that fans would be pleased. "The story comes first. And I can't really play it to an audience. I mean the story is what the story is." THAT is what is lacking with Disney Star Wars! They are constantly trying to "play it to the audience", either by ripping off previous entries (Abrams), or by deliberately "subverting expectations" (Johnson).

@@fundhund62 Well said! +

Modern cinema would have been a lot better then.

Complete horseshit. He's not the first person to use lots of green screens or CGI and he used it way worse than contemporaries with the prequels.

@@richardcahill1234 Oh si, como olvidar esa época hace 20 años en el que el cine estaba lleno de comedias románticas y actores de acción de los 80/90 tratando de convencer a todos de que sus clichés seguían funcionando... Eso si, extraño las épicas coml Troya y LOTR

@@ArthurVand This is wrong. It's not the amount of greenscreen used, it's what was portrayed on it. Look at how vivid and dynamic the Prequel environments are, the attention to detail, the fluid, Disney-like motion on the animated characters, how well CG and practical are integrated together by the end. Lucas' CGI looked awkward because it was pushing the medium of computer animation incredibly hard, to the point where directors like Rian Johnson, James Cameron and Peter Jackson have all said that the Prequels advanced not just CG, but digital filmmaking by decades. Lucas wasn't bound by studio budgets or a million focus groups or strict limitations, he gathered a team of the best creatives of their time and let them go wild. Compare Naboo's CG models in the first film to the second film and the jump is staggering. Compare Watto to General Grievous and it's alarming how quick the advancements were made. Do remember that CG foundations such as motion capture rigs, render passes, sub-surface scattering, global illumination and other ubiquitous modern technologies were quite literally invented in these movies.

@@tsukopara2054 CGI was used in places where it should not have been. There was no need for CGI backgrounds in random scenes like Anakin and Windu walking down a corridor. It looks weird, sterile and unconvincing. The problem isn't the quality of the CGI which is understandable for the time, it's the overuse of it at times when it was completely unnecessary. Lucas's lack of restraint made the movies way worse, regardless of whether it was cutting edge tech for the time.

As a James Bond fanatic and a huge admirer of Christopher Lee, I second this. He was a literal war hero and one of the great actors of all time. What a legacy.

Fans will probably only begin to appreciate Lucas' genius in the prequels long after he is gone. If ever. Sad as it is, but George is not alone in this. Many great artists suffered the same fate.

I hope we see the "too experimental to sell" stuff he's mentioned working on in his retirement someday

Totally. I have to say that Lucas did a great job with all the visual design (especially Episode I and III) Dex's Diner was a terrible mistake if you aks me... Dexter Jettster the only Star Wars Character I really hate. But anyways, its a shame Lucas didnt seek somebody to help him out with his poor writing skills.

@@ludomirsteinbruck9376 Lucas did actually asked help for the prequels from his friends like Spielberg, Ron Howard ect.. and they declined saying that George should have done it himself.

Imagine how groundbreaking the ST would have been under him. Filoni (& Favrau ) think carries George's spirit with the mandalorian evolving things like the volume

Comes with the fact that none of us know him. Not his biggest fans. Not his biggest haters. We just know his public face. The real guy is more complex and human than any pop culture icon could hope to be.

It seemed super tense to me.

@@wesley5729 Sounds like you have social anxiety

I doubt that's VHS.

Nobody work like at the precuels in the latest sequels film, the last films looks so old.

The sequels still ruined my story

I think the heart of the difference between the Original Six film by Lucas and the three by Disney is that under Lucas a movie was made because there was a story to tell. Where as with Disney a story was told because a movie had to be made. The Force Awakens and The Rise of Skywalker just felt like a cheap cash grab instead of a serious attempt to continue the story of Star Wars. I'm still trying to wrap my head around The Last Jedi.

@@ShamanMcLamie TLJ is a story, the problem is that its a very boring story that is all about being a bad version of M Night Shamylyan, which I would argue is kind of impressive.

I don’t understand that. There are so many people like you that say that as if you thinking it means it’s true. What that actually means is that you don’t think he’s a good script writer, that doesn’t mean that’s true just because you’re saying it. And he’s the billionaire who created the series, and everyone on here is not that and most if not all of them have not written even one script themselves. There’s something wrong with Star Wars fans, they have some of the unhinged aspect of K-pop fans. It’s like the same people who pay for the tickets so the series keeps going also attack it and everyone involved so much that they ruin it.

he also came up with the idea for Rouge 1

I am a 3d animator.

@@rizwanmation8431 U have quite the gift then

I have made a you tube video. Would you like to see it?

Mine was cheering and pounding the floors with their feet. Not every audience is the same.

How old are y'all?

When I saw it there was silence, people were into it. I guess depends on the crowd

I remember most of the theater was in a mix of shock and laughter, and one guy in the front row yelled, "Go Yoda!!!".

Sounds like it was a mentally immature audience. When i first saw it in the theatre, i remember people being in awe and cheering.

Aaron Kalat Digital Yoda looked like shit in the prequels. Even the puppet they used in Episode 1 looked nowhere near as good as the one in Empire.

rb hws Well it's a good thing your opinion doesn't matter ;)

Aaron Kalat Nice rebuttal.

rb hws It's just that you're talking about something completely different... I was talking about the puppet in episode 1, not the empire. That's why I said what I said. If you seriously think episode 1 puppet looks better than digital Yoda you need to get your head checked. It's not even an opinion.

Actually I do think the Episode 1 puppet looks better than digital Yoda. Not by much, but at least it's something tangible and practical.

I worked at Lucasfilm for half a year in 2008 when they were making Harry Potter 3. The number of people who work on these movies is boggling. The downside to this career is many get let go when a movie is finished, and then you have to be rehired or move on to another studio to find work. Being a 3d artist is a bit of a tough career path. The other people you don't see are the 50 other people working in just IT and support. You have a service desk of 7 people who handle all the calls and then the 40 or so helpdesk that goes all over campus to the artists. EVeryone had 2 computers. One Windows box and one Linux. The linux box's were all part of a cloud to help render out scenes.

@@ch-yq5yn very cool to hear from someone who's been apart of the team, thank you!

These people will complain about something revolutionary when it's in beta just because it's not as perfect as they thought

JD - You might as well say that for every James Bond story that wasn’t written by Ian Fleming.

JD - I never read them. I was just giving another example of a successful franchise with tons of material the original creator didn’t write.

At least George tried to do some different things in the prequels. He failed miserably but at least he tried. Very generic storytelling and wooden dialogue. He's a bad director for visuals, framing and even getting performances out of actors. Disney has a boardroom saying what they want to see and which race needs to have screen time. Basically a copy and paste of older movies and add in unfunny jokes.

Only problem was he should have been in episode 1 as a council member. Would have been great to see the transformation and Lee actually having a story arc. Lucas did each movie script not all together at the start but after each movie, so nothing was thought through properly and that's why secondary characters in the prequels are meaningless.

Christopher Lee is old school cool and to think he was only added in as a character because people hated jar jar so much.

Dylan Hickey or ILM

Who gives a shit! Pixar sucks and Disney ruined all their new movies using computer graphics instead of traditional hand-drawn animation. I'll take puppets and practical effects over pixels any day!

Actually, Pixar started out with computer graphics, and kept it by choice. Disney does not have too much say in the final picture. Toy Story 2 was supposed to be a musical for crying out loud.

TheOwlCreek Why does CGI ruin movies? If its done good (and it is when done by Pixar,ILM,Weta,Disney etc. it is beautiful and unnoticeable

@@TheOwlCreek you ignorant elitist, theres fantastic computer animated movies out there! The true issue is how you go about using the effcts knowing when n where to use practical or CGI in live action movies. as for animated film such as toy story the computer animation was an artistic choice and any work of art can be absolutely awesome regarless of the medium you choose to express yourself in.

How'd you meet him?

there was an vfx festival in febuary and a conference about the VFX of Pacific Rim. I even took a picture with him!

Awesome!

I know this is an old comment, but in case you didn't also know, he was one of the creators of Photoshop along with his brother

He wrote Rogue One!

At that time, Lucas was a legend, a titan in the film making world. He created not one, but two amazingly beloved movie franchises, and was basically regarded as a god. I think these days he'd be reigned in a little more, but back then he was so revered and powerful that no one dared to question him.

Jimb0 RLM just vocalized what everyone disappointed with the prequels were feeling. Anyone can watch the BTS and see the same thing.

@Jimb0 RLM aren't some sort of Deity, they are professional filmmakers (I would like to note that the art-form in question is indeed filmmaking). However, It takes half a brain to realize that there is an obvious imbalance of power on set. It takes the rest of a brain to realize how imperative a clash of ideas is for the success of a project of this scale. I'd also like to add that "You took that straight out of Plinkett's ass" and "A quote from 2009" hold no merit as arguments if Plinkett is 100% correct. Which he is. Also, you said, "Nah, most people weren't thinking of that" in response to the fact that RLM vocalized the feelings of those disappointed with the Prequel trilogy. If you imply that RLM did a bad job, then you should take a look at the overall reception of their videos on the topic - and their whole channel - over the past 10 years. There is a reason that they have such a strong following. It's because they are able to provide sincere, entertaining, and informative takes on several filmmaking issues when required. If, however, you are implying that most people weren't disappointed with the prequel trilogy, then I can only assume you are blind -and perhaps a bit deaf-. The trilogy has been berated by filmgoers and critics alike and the after-effects are hard to miss. The low metacritic, rottentomatoes, etc. scores. The general consensus around Star Wars in the years following the Prequel trilogy. The downright SALE of Lucasfilm and Lucasarts and all included spiritual properties by George (Besides the toy department). Hell, there is even a documentary called "The people against George Lucas" that aired on movie theatres. I would also recommend that this time you do watch the Plinkett review if you do intend to respond in regards to it. It is blindingly obvious that you haven't.

george goulop RLM? Good filmmakers? Pfffffffffft, because they'd clearly know more about how to make movies than GL, someone who has dedicated his whole life to the practice. And for that matter, they'd clearly know more about what is and is not Star Wars than the creator of Star Wars? Really? You're such a pretentious, entitled OT fanboy. Btw, its fair to completely discredit anything RLM says about the prequels as false because they obviously don't understand any of the SW movies, not just the prequels. You'd have to not understand these movies and have not paid attention to them in order to miss the fact that Qui-Gon is the primary main character in The Phantom Menace for example. RLM really doesn't have any valid arguments against the prequels, nothing they say holds up to scrutiny when put under a lens. I also get the impression that you've never heard the terms "silent majority" and "vocal minority" before.

@@boyishdude1234 you do realise GL made the ot right?

grievous549 There was once a story about horses that evolved into a 2 up, 2 down apartment in a cupboard somewhere in the region of tommorow. There is an infinite quantity of helicopters if you'd just care to look at the sounds they make when you hear the wonderful taste of garlic. But don't let that put you off, there are plenty more fish in the car drivers manual. I'm sure you could find something of denial if you dig deep enough. Fair enough? 5 out of 10 cats say their houses prefer it. A+++ great seller, would buy again!

:D

grievous549 Still need more hugs eh? You should spend more time with kittens.

grievous549 Wow the way you talk to people for having a different opinion than you is just disgusting you are a cancer to the star wars community.

Elephants don't like Mice, and Mice like cheese and insects. One or both of these statements might be true, or otherwise. Gods may be dogs, or dogs may be Gods if you look in the mirror. Behold the truth of nothing in particular, the internet of sginht.

pity that it didnt exactly happen with STRANGE MAGIC

Definitely for worse.

@@Pablo123456x Absolutely not. You see CGI all the time and don't even notice it. Most vehicles, cityscapes, streets, and crowds these days are all CGI. Stunts are now far safer because of CGI enhancement, and it saves the studio money and affords directors more time. You just see the bad CGI and assume its all like that.

@@Syklonus yeah, but those subtle digital enhancements are not at all what Lucas's prequel trilogy pioneered. Lucas pushed for completely CGI sets and characters that never failed to look fake and out of place (if not altogether uncanny). The box office success of that crap is what's allowed 'films' like Transformers, Green Lantern, and even freaking Cats to comprise such a huge portion of modern blockbusters.

@@sirpancherto sirpancherto On the one hand there are very few "full CGI sets" in the Prequels. In Phantom Menace there's only one, which was certain parts of the pod race environment. In Ep2, there's the Droid factory scene, which was filmed after shooting was long over. The vast majority of sets in the Prequels are real world locations(Spain, Tunisia, Italy, England), sets built in a studio, or miniatures. CGI was mostly used for animated characters. On the other hand, you name some "bad" movies as if the "good" ones don't use the same techniques, or are somehow more "subtle." Is Marvel subtle? Unlike the Prequels, the Marvel movies heavily feature fully digital sets. Some of them are filmed almost entirely on blue screen. Or even the new Star Wars movies, which are loaded with CGI, like The Force Awakens, which exclusively used CGI set extensions(and no miniatures). I haven't seen cats, or Green Lantern, but I've seen the first transformers movie in theater. I highly doubt anyone walked out there thinking it didn't look incredible. And if some people don't like that movie, it's not the fault of the visual effects. Even the most negative reviews of the Prequels still universally praised the visuals when they came out.

@@sirpancherto LOL what? Prequels had more physical sets and models than the OT. What a dumbass comment

That's exactly what made these films so amazing!

and that’s exactly why the sequels are so bad

Kinda funny. When the same man, who says this, wrote "I can't love. I am a senator." I still try to figure out what this means.

@@christianschmidt8476 The line actually went "I can´t. We can´t. It´s just not possible". Later she would add "We live in a real world. Come back to it! You´re studying to become a jedi, I´m a senator." What´s difficult to understand about it? It made perfect sense, and was a lovely moment between the two.

@@fundhund62 She is a senator and can't love. What? It's interesting, because The clone wars retconned his senseless shit and now senators are absolute free to love whoever they want.

7:38

👀

@@vanomxxx 😂

"Genius is what you get when talent encounters opportunity."

Ma Rk same

@Ma Rk lazy

@@NOLOAF-AR dumb & lazy

He can move faster by using the force. Its called Ataru. Though using the force in such a way is extremely tiring.

TheNuisanceBird "Ataru?" I thought that means 'to get struck/hit by' in Japanese?

Michael RedCrow Geeeeeeek!

+Marcela McDaniel nnktlkrokkiktktktkjjttkjtjktkkkkrkkkkijtikijpkkkjjkrkkkkkkjjjjjrjrjj er

+Amjid Khan yeah and i dont understand why yodas personality is all whitty and clumsy in the old films and in the new ones hes all serious and 'wise'.

Really was the movie really that bad ?