If only we could go back.//

Shane Ellis who would want to go back?!? We finally got new mutants and that’s what matters!! I’m joking

If it never ended I would be just perfectly fine with that.

@@snko92 I totally agree...a lot of saying get past 2020...urm....nothing is guna change except the date people....same world, same horror show of a planet right now

I would kill a toddler to be back in 2012ish

Jamie Mountain maybe that spider will bite Mr. Sunday and he’ll gain superpowers

I'm looking forward to the sequel. "This time...it's personal."

Better then all the flops of 2018😂

@@MemberWhen ooo o

TJ Hastie That doesn’t really count it was a limited release at about 10 or so theaters and wasn’t marketed and was just released for the people involved for their pleasure

Short Star Wars Essays it would’ve had a wide release, but then all the unpleasantness came to light so they purposely never gave it a chance

could they have chosen a worse title

james84 - Pharrell has a clothing brand called Billionaire Boys Club, which means they were fighting jus for a google spot.

@@GrownUpKid94 spacey was probably thankful something else might come up if someone googled billionaires, boys and clubs lmao

Tbh that makes a lot of sense

I feel part of the reason Tron Legacy got greenlit was to practice that de aging tech they used in that film. Same with Guardians of the Galaxy as a dry run for making Star Wars type shots with modern effects.

That actually crossed my mind

@@rubaiyat300 wait, what? You think GOTG was made as a dry run for upcoming Star Wars movies..?!? I'm intrigued, please explain.

As a CG artist I think it's cute that you think Disney gives enough thought to its CG artists to do something like that.

It's waiting for you to let your guard down...

rip in piece mr sunday filmography

He's going straight for your balls mate!

Spiders are good for keeping annoying insects out, let him live!!!!

Mr Sunday Movies ur opinion doesn’t matter I liked the last Jedi... I’m not joking tho

You could do the same for mortal engines. Say the cities are racing and instant winner

@@avataz More like if the cities were doing heists.

That actually sounds like a legit Japanese version of a F&F film title.

The Fahurricane and the Furiheist

@@avataz Fast Mortal and Furious Engines!

nah, shrek

Nah the animated Disney one

That, and Disney cartoon...but men in tights is so good!

😷

MahMahAfro3000 and a True Box Office Bomb.

Very colorful ans very expensive

I saw a trailer on TV for it two days or so before it released. I thought, "A Nutcracker movie, beginning of November, that I haven't heard any word of... It's gonna be a bomb isn't it?" Low and behold, later that day one of the KZfaq Critics I follow posted a review for it and said it sucked.

This is the 2nd time I've heard of it. The 1st time was when it was #1 on Jeremy Jahns' Worst Movies of the Year list, never seen a single ad or heard anyone talk about it at all.

It's the same with the live action Cinderella movie. I didn't know it existed until last month but it came out 3 years ago.

Sweet callback

CeilloNoll cheers mate

Not even going to ask how.

jim jimjim you don’t want to know

One in each hand and one up the

Harry I it’s both funny and sad when a movie doesn’t make back its budget ex: Gotti

Actually it made $618

@@miscellaneoof i think thats domestically

Right, Disney didn't appreciate them wasting their money because they're better at wasting it themselves.

His name is Alden Ehrenreich and he is not a terrible actor at all. He has worked with Francis Ford Coppola, Woody Allen, Park Chan-Wook and the Coen Brothers. I didn't see Solo, he may have been miscast, but he is definitely not a bad actor. He's certainly far better than Emilia Clarke.

What could possibly be a bigger waste of money than hiring a new top tier director, recasting roles and reshooting most of a movie? This excuse has always sounded like nonsense, to me. I'm more inclined to believe that Lawrence and Jonathan Kasdan were upset with the deviations from their script, and Lawrence's word carries more weight at Lucasfilm than Lord's or Miller's.

Which begs the usual question of why they hired two guys known for improvisational comedy and then panicked when they did just that.

Kathleen Kennedy is the problem. She didn't like the way they did things and felt it didn't represent their bland. She hated the improvisational dialogue and thought the movie was too much of a comedy. Which is really stupid because she hired two very successful comedic directors.

I rented it, it's fine.

That's the title of the upcoming Bill Cosby documentary.

The marketing could be "They stepped on his lawn once too many"

Sounds like the latest Steven Seagal DVD Flick

So, you are saying that the advertisement team didn't bust their balls in order to promote the Nutcracker?

I barely saw any advertisement for it too. And the ones that I did, I have to admit it seemed boring.

I saw no advertising whatsoever, I only found out this movie exists after clicking on this video!

I saw an advert for it in the summer, 6 months prior to release. I also enjoyed the movie and my 10 year old niece (the target audience) loved it not sure why it did so poorly.

I didnt even know it existed until i saw this video lol

Too true man. My whole friend group wouldn't stop discussing it after seeing it

Reminded me of _2001_ in all the right ways.

Yeah Alex Garland is definitely one of my favorite writers/directors. Can't wait for his new show Devs to start on FX

I know this comment is a year old but I thought the film was a big ol' pile of wank

Brando i thought it was wonderfully done, beautiful visuals and horrifying themes about existence and our nature of self destructive habits

Mine too.

Shitty movie. You should watch good movies not that shit and raise your standards.

Scho0rschi you should mind your own business and let other people have their opinion

The movie had way to many radom jumps in genre that really didn't fit. I like the story and the concepts surrounding it, the acting for the most part was great and the world they created is stunning. Yet it felt like each part was directed by a different person. Still, its a great movie that at least tried to be different (ignoring how it's based off a book).

@@GeorgiosD90 debateble. What isn't though is the fact that you're an ass.

Christopher White I don’t think that’s the case...I just think people have different tastes.

Don't be a snob about it

@Christian Chavarria annihilation the movie isn't even as good as the book. Don't bother with the 2 after that tho.

Wtf? Your profile pic is so creepy. That and the screenname was more funny than it needed to be

The Brad Pitts or the Pits

@not so bright do it bloody do it

Is that Dr. Phil?

@@zidani.s6712 nay thee

@@danielvillalobos4265 Prehaps if they made Solo before Force Awakens? Though that could have just made FA bomb, I dunno.

@bigpimpdaddy69 Hear hear! There are a lot more empirical factors one can discuss when going into Solo's failure, but a vocal part of the Fandom just wants to scapegoat The Last Jedi. Director changes, expensive reshoots, an inexperienced lead, releasing in a crowded market, we could go on and on without even touching the fans supposedly turning on the franchise.

The Kessel Run sequence is one of the most fun and visually impressive scenes in the saga. There is still plenty of mystery or Han and isn’t ruined just because we got a great chase scene

Solo was a good film. It reminded me of how Starwars was more about people trying to live in this galaxy far far away and more less about the jedi and some empire trying to take over the galaxy. The only drawback I got from the film was how they got Solo's name. I just laugh it off

I didn't see Solo in theaters specifically because of the Last Jedi

It's a great Tv show, Netflix changed the name in english speaking countries because House of Paper(Casa de Papel) is too similar to House of Cards

@@matheuscoutinho4690 it's actually a veeery mediocre series with an intriguing start that evolves to a shitty soap opera with huge plot holes and little to no interest left by the end of the second season

Duke V Y E S. I was about to say the same thing.

@@lonewandererfo3 I defy you to show me a show that took more leaps and stayed as fresh as this show, for two reasons. The first is that I think very highly of this show because of its amazing cinematography, acting and, yes, the fresh script. Secondly, you seem like the kind of person that has recommendations for TV and I need something to watch.

@@cg1906 Hmm it depends on what you like to watch...I don't usually categorize the series I've watched depending on the leaps the director takes but I guess if you tell me what you've already watched and loved, I can suggest you something

Wolverine is out to kill Spider-Man CONFIRMED FOR THE MCU!

Weapon-X What if you're killing a spider and see another spider?..... Burn the place down I assume.

@@jim191185 Venom and Pyro CONFIRMED!

Or else he's already dead and his corpse is being operated by remote control from Scientology headquarters.

tom cruise is thicc he got that booty cake that keeps him alive

nickoli singh cringe

@@RealPatrickBateman1 lmaooo

One of these days, Tom is gonna die during another crazy stunt!

What compelled you to pay money to see it in the first place.

#releasethesnydercut of Solo

There was never an 'original version' made

Disappointment at it's finest.

Nah mate, these guys are in Australia. If they get bit by a spider, they become Corpse-Man

By that logic, prequels just shouldn’t ever exist.

Yoot Doot More like bore Ragnarok am I right!

@@mrmogford3469 wrong channel mate 😂😂

Aaron Gazname glad to see someone appreciated that

@@mrmogford3469 Tis the season of giving i guess

Aaron Gazname it is I hope your taking your family to feck world this Christmas

I almost went to see it with somebody but stopped at the last second.

I remember hearing about it and thinking it could be good... Then I saw the first trailer. Yeesh.

Watch "Meet the Feebles" (coincidentally directed by Peter Jackson) for a superior rude puppets movie. You can find the whole thing on KZfaq.

When I heard about it I thought it sounded interesting but then the trailer came out Melissa M killed my interest she’s not a bad comedian(I liked The Heat)but it seemed like it was just a copy and paste of her movie cliche’s I.e I’m not attractive, I’m so awkward.

I laughed so much at it! As a film not great but if you go there not expecting an epic then its good fun!

That sucks. You should just say "before 9/11" and everyone will nod their head and just agree with you. Saying"life was at it's best" ever since then is fucking retarded. If people saying "let's just go back to normal"(usually referencing "just get the vaccine you GuYyYs!!!!") think "normal" includes any date between 9/11-present day..... we're royally fucked.

But you have a device to post on KZfaq...... I'll wooosh myself out

@@Anthonyelmio2 The public library has computers smart guy.

Gary Goodspeed as a homeless man makes sense.

@@ReservoirDolphin 👍

Tell me u guys arent really homeless

King Kagle films have to gross double their budget to break even. Remember the cinema chains take half the box office

@@lewisjames4268 "Films have to gross double to break even[...]" Hence my little math work there.

unfortunately a lot of studios are really greedy and have ridiculous expectations. Batman vs Superman is considered somewhat a failure because it didn't break a billion dollars but still made triple what it cost. Most films are considered flops even they don't double what they cost to make.

Probably just because it was so big, the studio was expecting it to be much more successful. $50 mil profit is a lot to an individual (or a small country) but for a big studio it’s likely barely worth the time and effort put in.

@@k1ngk4gl3 300 million at box office is split around 60% for the studios and 40% for the theatres. So 180 million minus the budget and marketing.

I was saying the same thing. Many of these movies on this list are not considered bomb. Domestically, they were not liked, but they made a VERY HUGE PROFIT around the world.

Most movies cost DOUBLE their reported budget to market etc., so every movie on the list deserved to be there except Skyscraper. Agree on that one.

@@takeit1229 skyscrapers marketing was big though

That budget is only for production not marketing. Marketing is adding 50-100 % more. The box office is all the money people spent on movie tickets. Cinema in US are taking about 50% from that and abroad they take even more(for localization and similar things I think). So Skyscraper would have to get like 400 mil in US alone to just break even. Not to mention that movies are investment for big studios and just breaking even isnt that good for them.

@@rewq435 If you count it that way then it would still be a huge success because DVD rentals, DVD sales, merchandise, steaming rights, along with tons of other money they get from the actual film.

Unfortunately, not all

It was.

Yeah I loved it

Hello from the future. You were right.

I think they did a few months ago, and it's apperentlly the last Rambo movie. I don't know anything about the 5th one as it kind of came and went.

I know this is a year later but I loved solo. It really would have done better if they put it out in the gap between the last jedi and rise and not put it out at a few months after. I don't understand the star wars fatigue when we had a new mcu movie coming out every 3-6 months

Rigbys Life of Gaming agreed it was great for me too.

The Christmas market was too packed. You had bumblebee, aquaman and Spider-man in the same month.

@@rigby117 I think the difference is that most of the Marvel movies coming out were enjoyable, and generally well liked if not amazing movies. The Last Jedi was...divisive to say the least. I fully believe THAT was what caused the 'fatigue'. People who liked it were tired of defending that garbage, and people who hated it didn't trust Star Wars anymore.

Yeah also not a flop, just released on Netflix not at the cinema.

Well, it was released in the cinema in the U.S. And I don’t believe it made a ton of money... but that’s partially because the studio worried it was “too smart” for people and didn’t properly market it and nearly made it a Netflix-only release worldwide. Also... it probably is too smart for a lot of people because a lot of people are just... wow, so fucking dumb. So it suffered from Blade Runner 2049 syndrome: Brilliant, powerful and deeply cerebral film trying to exist in a world where Black Panther is 98% on Rotten Tomatoes and nobody has the patience for anything. Also like BR2049, it’s a hard-R piece of work and makes people - especially the aforementioned super fucking dumb ones - uncomfortable. The book is also *AMAZING* Everybody read that shit.

Mike Noir Sure you mean “irony,” chief?

@@expensivesuit7286 you know black panther was at least entertaining this movie was as ex machina a bait to idiots who like to believe they are smarter than others and understood the deeper meaning of a movie made by people who took a summer philosophy course

@@expensivesuit7286 black panther was a very average Marvel set piece. Annihilation was a brilliant movie that was also quite entertaining. Annihilation the book was honestly too cerebral and boring for me, and I'm usually into that type of stuff.