You actually stated that there are now multiple, credible military personnel who are witness to UAPs. How many do you need? Many of the old debunked sightings should be re-examined. The governments had active debunking programs to shut down the conversation. Witnesses were ridiculed, careers were ruined. I don't think they're alien. However, whatever they are, they've been there for as long as humans have been able to record them. Many sightings bear similarities to tales in folklore. It is a fascinating piece of human experience.

A false flag to scare us and move us to a one world govt. watch the signs.

@@rezadaneshi - Almost every object in orbit doesn't 'repeat their pass' - each of their 'passes' is a 'slice' that moves around the earth. You may have to wait days for a satellite to be overhead again.

Ugh, sigh. That camera footage that is in IR, can easily be a bird. This has been shown in other analysis of the footage + the pilot commentary. And you state that the radar was just upgraded. I want to believe, but I call squirrel. Sorry.

This video is irresponsible. You're only feeding conspiracy nuts by posting it.

100%.

most of the pentagon videos have been debunked and can be explained easily.

@@bullywife not true. but Mick West does have a cool name.

@@bullywife Simplemente MIENTES.

@@matthewmcclusky3544 it is true. They’ve all been reproduced or have alternate explanations

By Mick West you mean carefully considered rational explanations I take it.

@@drjonathonflash Obviously! This video was made to cater to the crazies. Sorry it intruded on your carefully considered rational fantasy.

@@szpetnyjan This video and those about the wow signal and Fermi paradox are just vulgar clicbaits to grow the audience. They really don't fit in the strictly scientific tone of the channel and others already talk about this way more scientifically (or more sensationalistically if it's what you like).

@@PainterVierax I'd like to see the topic fit in more, and more videos are the way to do it. You are wrong about it being vulgar and certainly about it being clickbait. I got what I expected after clicking.

"Science" means following evidence wherever it takes you, without letting any pre-conceived notions sway you from that path. That does NOT in any way preclude the possibility that these are actual ET encounters/signals. I'm always amused to see scientifically-minded people stating absolutes about the universe in so far as what is "possible" or "likely." We can barely fart a few astronauts off the surface of this speck of dust that we call Earth. What you're doing is akin to a microbe making grand assumptions about the function and inner workings of a skyscraper. No one is in any position to do that, and it's very possible that such will always be the case.

I have been watching a lot of KZfaq shows about UAP and one thing is very clear. The evidence that the public gets to see is only the tip of the iceberg. Many, many credible sources are saying we have mind blowing pictures, video, radar, infrared that make this no doubt, it's not human

I'm always excited to Channing Tatum shirtless, uaps scare the literal shyt out of me but also kind of exciting too.

I’m also massively skeptical that aliens are flying their spaceships around Earth, but I’ll always keep an open mind and definitely prefer videos that haven’t decided beforehand that UAPs are aliens.

@@trutherror I assume this is a Jupiter Ascending reference so you win the internet today 😂

For a level headed evidence based thorough debunking of the videos, see Thunderf00t's videos.

Yep

Same

Bed story gang ris... lay down!

congrats you payed attention to the video 😅

Not at all - it's because some sightings are of light, gas, stars - so 'aerial phenomena' is the correct term. Even if it IS an alien - if its a cloud of gas or a highly intelligent shade of the colour blue, then it's not an object.

​@@JohnnyWednesday it is when we're referring to ufos and not gas

​@johnnywednesday9294 I miss Douglas Adams...

No, the power healing crystals and interdimensional lizard overlords crowd is still heavily involved. When your a grifter you want to cast the widest net possible. They want the casually science interested crowd as well as the yoga heals cancer people too. Their money spends the same and they don't want to uh........alienate anyone.

Bingo. Much more likely than ET. Sad emoji.

Yep.

Like the Area51 hoax that there is alien tech so the the real spy air craft won't be so noticeable. I don't believe that there is human made technology that can break the rules of the physics lol.

I'm not seeing it. Why would you draw attention to something you want on the hush, hush? They'd likely do more just dispelling the rumors/hypotheses altogether, ignoring them, ridiculing those that bring them up, etc. And honestly if you're thinking about what's more likely, that we have the technology to produce aircraft with all of these crazy, sci-fi properties which would be an unimaginable LEAP in technology rather than the gradual one we've come to expect.... orrrr, that we have the technology to interfere with sensors in a way that LOOKS like aircraft with unexplainable physics.

@@ActionAlligator If it's a defense tech, as you suggest, maybe it's being tested on our own pilots. Thus they ask for active feedback. It's possible - and more likely than aliens. I think we're on the same page more or less.

Correct. The Tic Tac encounter happened off the coast of San Diego, California. Op should fix the narration in the video and repost. Otherwise, a very good video and comprehensive review of the strange events that happened that day.

I think he said Southern Carolina.

The video subtitles read Southern California.

He didn't even say South Carolina, he said Southern Carolina.

I guess you haven't been closely following this Yes, the tic tac encounter was off San Diego and involved the U.S.S. Nimitz task force but most of these videos were from encounters off South Carolina involving another aircraft carrier task force

"U NEED PROOFS"

Why u guys didnt blast them out of the sky? We need evidence

@@tyroneensano1148 why do you need evidence of a UAP? It's a UAP. Something unidentified. You don't send out fighters in the middle of the night because of weird light orbs. Plus the whole incident took like 1 minute

@Aqua Fyre I was an undesignated seamen, which is deck department. We are the only ones to stand lookout watches

@@logank444 what i meant was we need evidence for aliens lol.. they could be aliens, plus they are a danger to commercial flights so i think that is enuf to justify scrambling jets to shoot it out of the sky

Wow, that's a really interesting story. Can you please describe what the photos looked like?

If you are still in contact can you get them to upload the images to social media. These same crafts are being seen today. Cigars, tic tacs and saucers. Awesome story btw!!

u should check out the kumburgaz ufo that showed up for weeks over 3 yrs. you can even see the occupants sometimes. there is a youtube channel with the footage, and u can search for stills online. the most amazing footage i've seen

As an Aussie, it's nice to hear of this story from the Land Down Under

40+ years ago you was already an adult, geez stop breathing up our air ya fossil

Yet still the airforce is silent

I had one in 2018, but I’ve always second-guessed it like every strange, unexplained thing I’ve encountered. I was looking up at the sky and there was a moving object. It was moving strangely and almost looked like a star but it was early dusk. Then it suddenly shot off in a perfectly straight line disappearing almost instantly. Could have been something normal to someone, but it was strange to me. I imagine other people who saw it may have decided it was alien craft.

Not just knew, but knew AND WANTED YOU TO KNOW.

They usually end up being birds, and then the pilots refuse to admit they don't understand how radar and thermal cameras work.

they can be animals we aren't aware of; like they say, birds, insects or other stuff; sometimes, they don't run any other test other than visual and radar; for example, try to signal the thing, or try to detect wether if it communicates or expells some material... maybe we can try to find methods for detecting other telltale signs like biomass, electronics, gases or whatnot

I agree, the single biggest value-added part of this whole thing, is simply the de-stigmatizing of it, so some serious scientists-type folks can actually be part of studying it. And as for NASA’s involvement: Keep in mind, that’s been limited: It’s not primarily NASA people involved, but people/researchers doing a limited evaluation of some NON-classified data (only) under NASA auspices as part of the overall US Government effort, and only for a specified period of time (i.e. not an on-going thing). Still, it’s valuable to have it de-stigmatized.

@@helmaschine1885 Lol, good grief.

@@luiscolin7775 Yes -Birds that descend from 80,000 to 20,000 feet in less than 10 seconds. A common creature, fer sure...

That's presented to us as "direct evidence". But how many millions of line codes are in a modern military aircraft? Among them, how many are directly qt work between the sensors and the humans involved in this "direct" evidence. Extraordinary things need extraordinary proofs. Up to now I still dont buy it.

oh no! Aliens would took our resources... which is many times more in asteroid bells... hmm no! they will use us as slaves or in "space zoo"... which they need only a DNA from few groups of people to clone humans.... wait... why are they are here and what problems we could have?

What does not make any sense to me - is why the pilot, who has been send to investigate UAP did have some other "top-secret waypoints" in his mission, not related to UAP?

Thanks for sharing your story! I also saw a UFO/UAP a couple years ago here in Australia. I saw it on a clear sunny day high up in the sky. It was a white triangle with a keyhole shape cutout in the back. Now I think about it, this one didn’t have any sound either. It was going pretty fast ( I assume since it looked really high up ). I dunno it’s always cool to remember these experiences when people in the media are having these conversations, about whether they are real or not, because we’ll always have these first-hand experiences to look back on. The thing is, I’ll still probably never know whether it was aliens or the government who were controlling it.

I saw something very similar in the skies above Leeds, West Yorkshire a few years ago. I have a workshop next to an ancient woodland in a village on the outskirts of Leeds. There is very little light pollution. I was outside watching the stars when I noticed something moving in a unique way. It zig-zagged, went from slow to fast, fast to slow, in no obvious pattern. I watched it in amazement for around quarter of an hour and then locked up my workshop and headed for the bus home. All the way to the bus stop I was keeping my eyes on the craft, and I was surprised it was bright enough to be seen when I was under streetlights. When I got to the bus stop I watched it for a further 10 minutes or so, at which point a satellite came from east to west, and the craft zoomed over to the satellite as if inspecting it and then promptly zoomed away again. It seemed playful! At that point, a man I know from the village came to the bus stop as I was looking up. I said to him "I think we've got company!" and he never said another word to me until the bus came, as if he was dumbfounded. When I got off the bus, I phoned my then partner in Harrogate and watched the craft for around 15 minutes as I walked along the nature trail alongside a local beck and old railway line. It continued to move in strange ways, at great speeds at times, and I was actually audibly laughing in delight. I lost sight of it for a while as the light pollution of where I live made it difficult to see but as I walked through the park, I could see it was still there. I stood and watched it for a further 10 minutes when I got to my garden, at which point I'd been watching it for 45 minutes or so. Amazed, thrilled and happy, I went in my house.

My dad and I both saw something similar to this about 20 years ago. Cold winter night, western Canada, two star-sized points of light zigzagging across the western sky as if they were chasing each other or dogfighting. I had a weird reaction; I started screaming and couldn’t move until they sort of faded out of view. It was like they sort of dematerialized in the middle of their display, without any real pause in their action. It only lasted maybe 45 seconds tops, but I’ve not seen anything like it to this day. I wish I could remember the year, but 2000-2003 is the best I can pin it to at this point.

@@dannybowden5296 Wow, it's so cool to know i am not alone! The only one who believes me are my parents. My dad saw something once too.

@@handenbramilton I wonder if they dematerialized or disappeared so quickly it looked like it.

@@NatureFreak1127 When I was around 13 years old, 1995, I saw a bunch of the dematerialize then rematerialise type. Funnily enough, it was in the same area geographically which I've not really thought about. I was bringing the washing in off the line as it was nearly dark, when something in my head told me to look over towards the woods. When I did, I saw several independent orangey lights/orbs, some moving in tandem, some moving this apart, some together, but then they'd disappear and reappear almost at the same time in a different area of the sky. At times they appeared to chase each other, then they'd drift apart or quickly move to another area of the sky. Safe to say I slung the washing in the basket and locked the door behind me. If it were to happen today I'd watch them until there was nothing to watch, and of course try to record footage.

Man made, classified nuclear propulsion aerial vehicle. The USAF was in charge of keeping all records. That change, however, as China and Russia have now made their own hypersonic vehicles.

@@shaynefowley5689 Isn’t reverse engineering a bitch!!!

You were on the set of Close Encounters and forgot over time…

i saw the same thing w my cousin in his backyard except it was an orange orb similar height off the ground, came outta nowhere i didnt see but he said just floated over the house and dropped a little then hovered for a few minutes, he nudged me when it first appeared so when i looked up it was just there hovering over the houses behind his about 50ish feet in the air, this thing gave off ZERO sound and was a round orb shape so no propulsion could be seen from my perspective... when he said film it, i fumbled to get my camera app open and as he said that this thing took off exactly like you said shot up into sky again no sound or visible propulsion... the craziest part, this was 5 years before the nimitiz and FLIR videos came out so that was very cool and affriming, we were in the yard looking around for it and all of a sudden this rumble noise got louder and louder and LOUDER and then BOOM a military jet, one, with no running lights came screaming over us SUPER LOW like ive seen the blue angels and been around military bases where these jets fly and seen/heard a few low passes but this beats all of them by a long shot, my guess is that orb had been messing w the jet all night, it was 2am btw when this happened, and the jet/orb lost track or something happened this orb literally shot off and disappear so i dont think it had any issues doing that to the jet when it wanted to but most likely was fucking w it like in the FLIR videos, so it decided to drop down and say hi to us or just show off IDK but that jet was circling trying to find it and coordinate w radar who had to been tracking it but suddenly the jet saw it on the ground and dive bombed it trying to chase and keep up with it, thats when it took off right before so either our phone being out or it knew the jet was coming one or both. to me, theres no way that was our military tech, why in the world would it ever stop and get that close to humans who have no classified clearences AND the freakin jet chased it, i dont think the jet expected ppl to be outside and had no way of turning back when it saw us i mean it had to have seen us my cousin has about half acre backyard with other areas of field around his too but there are houese nearby so that jet had to have seen 2 ppl just standing in middle of yard cuz it was that low, i get goosbumps just thinking back to the sound and sudden realization of that thing SCREAMING over us, its one thing to see an orb and chalk it up to this or that smoked one too many doobies that night LOL but to have a mil jet CHASE it, they would never chase it like that if it was our tech why even go after it just let the flyer do its thing and fly aorund if it got to low or off course they will correct or go find it the jet doesnt need to announce itself like that... to me either the jet ppl thought it was such a danger it needed to be chased like that or they were just feeling some type of way about that thing messing w them and want to go chase it cuz why not thats what those guys/girls eat/sleep/breath everyday is hoping to chase something cool more like enemy jet but thats even cooler i bet.

There is a very common phenonena that due to atmosphere bending light due to changes in temperature, boats and ships appear to float above water. But as to shooting up to the sky, depends on how high it wisibly went, might also be atmospheric illusion, might be something else.

When has the government being open been in the citizens best interest? It's a psyoo

Dude we KNOW there’s life out there. Don’t look to your government or media to verify it for you. As previous commenter said it’s not at all in their interest to confirm it.

​@@legibby I agree with what you say. The powers that be, and NASA are unlikely to release to the public the best evidence they have on UFOs/objects flying around in our skies, or near the moon. I decided six years ago to find out for myself, and have taken photos of objects in our sky and near the moon.There were over ten UFOs that were not in orbit around the moon but stayed to the right of the moon for over a four hour period on 15.11.18 They are not the typical flying saucers shape, but come in many varied shapes, colours and sizes, none of which look aerodynamic enough to fly in Earth's atmosphere. If it is not our technology, who's is it?

They aren't being open. They shot 3 of them down and didn't release a picture or video. But they made sure to show you that balloon

@@carlosantana770 Stop inventing conspiracy theories, there's too many already. We all saw the damn balloons ok? They were Chinese spy balloons. We shot them down. Period. End of story.

F/A-18s are 80s-era birds. Many of them have upgraded the sensor packages, but those upgrades tend to be to other parts of the EV spectrum rather than the visual. Pilots have eyes that can look around. They need sensors to detect things that they can't see. That's why the gun cams (which took those videos) are likely still 80s-era equipment (and are thus grainy rather than HD).

​@@housellama I get that but the whole mission was to get a good look at what's been going on day after day. It's not inconceivable to ratchet things up a notch so you can document what you see. I'm not making any conclusions. I just keep hearing about how common these things are and for some reason nobody can get a single, solitary image. I would be a lot less surprised to find out that there indeed are plenty of good photos, but they've not been released. At least that tells me that someone involved used a rational idea for their investigation.

Honestly anyone who mocks someone over the potential for life outside of Earth is a complete moron

There is nothing to mock. These are images caused by reflections and refractions of light in air. The mockery should come when people propose ridiculous explanations like space-aliens, or 'flying objects'. There are no objects. Just images. Every single effect can be understood from optics.

It's a retarded American cultural phenomenon, mocking it is being kind.

@@annaclarafenyo8185 you better get on the phone to NASA and the White House and tell them they're wasting their time then. Seriously, is it really so hard to have an open mind? If 99.9% of sightings can be explained that still leaves 0.1% unexplained. And that is something that needs to be looked into, especially when you're as paranoid and controlling as the US military. 0.1% means something is going on. Could really be aliens, could be a fearmongering campaign, could be experimental technology foreign or domestic. But it needs looking into, and should be embraced as exciting times for science and discovery, not shot down as nonsense by some conceited bellend on the internet.

They should hire Mick West

It’s intentionally downgraded to obfuscate their capabilities. The originals according to the pilots and techs is far superior.

@@keirfarnum6811funny enough the orignal recording of the first incident in the video, which was orderd to be deleted, surfaced on a forum 10 years ago in way better quality. but back them people dissmissed it

SAME!

Project Blue Beam. It's man-made, not ET's

@@The_unexplained you should change your name to the explained. Make the curtains match them drapes.

The letter U still stands for unidentified.

*government personnel ...and that's by design.

It was both

@@cjscala87 Regardless of where the Nimitz was, the state is called SOUTH Carolina. Not Southern.

…oceanography…

Yeah I noticed the same thing. The CC/Subtitle even says California lol.

Most of these lights can be explained as incoming flights into LA, San Diego and Tijuana.

The tone around UAP's has been changing because people realized these are IMAGES, not OBJECTS, and they are formed by natural lenses in air.

@@annaclarafenyo8185 I used to be just as skeptical, but tbh it's pretty weird we have a consistent yet small percentage of UAPs we can't explain even considering temperature inversions, illusions, etc. a consistent small percent could not be be adequately explained by the most advanced military scientists. we have high ranking navy officials coming out and saying they witnessed these things and documentation of multiple sensors picking up anomalous activity and yet can't always explain it. Even project blue book ended with many sightings unidentified. We don't know what it is yes, but we haven't explained it all either. I'm excited by the possibilities sure, but we can't ignore that there is something to be studied and learned here.

@@ZentaBon I AM EXPLAINING THE REMAINING CASES. They aren't temperature inversions, they are natural lenses formed by incipient clouds, and reflections off ice-sheets in the upper atmosphere. These are NOT standard atmospheric phenomena, these are new effects demonstrated by UFO sightings.

Or they could be sent out to star systems that are likely to *be able to sustain* life, with the intelligent beings who created them looking for a new home.

I too like the AI hypothesis although, like Jacques Vallee, I doubt the motive is biological research, because it has gone on for so long. It might be cultural research, documenting the evolution of a species from unconscious animal to god-like being, or it might even be an attempt to influence human cultural evolution, as Vallee has suggested. Vallee also doubts these things are extraterrestrial in nature. He thinks rather that they are hyperdimensional.

Alien life for sure exists. The chances of an alien life form developing the tech to travel to us and then actually doing it however is absurdly low. I do believe it has happened though

@Hev correct, but the growing number of verified unexplained sightings would tend to suggest some kind of visitation.

It’s not the existence of life that’s at question. That’s almost certainly true. It’s that there is intelligent life that has figured out a way to cover the almost unimaginable distance to get to us. Tens & hundreds of millions of light years. If it’s found to actually be true, the ability to travel such vast, interstellar distances would be 1,000 times more interesting than the fact that there’s life out there.

It’s not the existence of life that’s at question. That’s almost certainly true. It’s that there is intelligent life that has figured out a way to cover the almost unimaginable distance to get to us. Tens & hundreds of millions of light years. If it’s found to actually be true, the ability to travel such vast, interstellar distances would be 1,000 times more interesting than the fact that there’s life out there.

It’s not the existence of life that’s at question. That’s almost certainly true. It’s that there is intelligent life that has figured out a way to cover the almost unimaginable distance to get to us. Tens & hundreds of millions of light years. If it’s found to actually be true, the ability to travel such vast, interstellar distances would be 1,000 times more interesting than the fact that there’s life out there.

You don't trust the radar and fighter pilot eyes? There were also reports from German, Japanese and Allied pilots during WW2.

This thing is flies at absurd speeds, a dslr wouldn't even be able to capture it

​@@kennyg1358 I wouldn't trust a new radar system. It's not like the public is going to be allowed to analyze that data anyway. As for the pilots? Who knows. It's not like we can talk to them, inspect them and their airplanes, or be able to recreate the event. The video is grainy. The pilots said it was a white object that appears black in the video. That should tell you something.

@@bartomalatesta5652 the military has access to much better camera's than dslrs.

@@bartomalatesta5652 If your camera isn't designed to capture it, then it didn't capture it.

Ominous :) I like it

@@ZentaBon We won't be leaving. They won't let us. Media. It started a revolution. 3/5/1770. Too stupid to pass a simple test.

Well I mean this is just a generalization of stuff that's been happening every year for decades so this is just normal at this point lol

Not wanting to be detected while clearly having the technology to wipe us out - is a strong indicator they're only studying us. Probably scientists.

Could have been a ballon of some kind, a plastic bag, a drone, literally anything else but an alien

These are not objects, they are images, and the civilian jet couldn't see it, only you could.

Without wishing to rain on the parade, my guess is that the uptick in UAP sightings and increased government “openness” is a psy-op but without going down that rabbit hole, let’s look at it from another angle. How likely is it really to be aliens or even alien probes? The rare earth hypothesis would suggest that planets capable of hosting intelligent life are extremely rare within the universe. Furthermore it took around 3.5 billion years from life first appearing to get to multicellular organisms, with the likelihood of there being several great filters along this journey. Further to this the conditions that allow advanced intelligence to evolve are highly unusual. In our case a series of very lucky flukes. Of the 5,000,000,000 species which have ever lived on Earth only one has made civilisations. The occurrence of technological civilisations may be far less than one per galaxy, which explains the Fermi paradox and makes it highly unlikely that we have been, are being or ever will be visited by aliens.

BuT iTs A cRuIsE sHiP!!!

That's happened before with the 'object' being a glitch in the system. We were very nearly not here because a computer failed.

Some "objects" are simply birds viewed though long lenses and thermal cameras. It's hilarious how the news never report the very simple truth,and instead drum up superstition

Johnny Harris did an excellent video covering this topic in the scientific way you would like to see.

Pilots are stupid and ignorant, and not special in any way - except that pilots THINK they are smart and special. They are delusional as the other people who are convinced that have seen alien craft. 100% purest horse hockey!

As it’s so often repeated: it’s never aliens… until it is. Regardless it’s super interesting and definitely gets your gears turning

It's bigger on the inside.

It was almost 50 years ago mate... memory is a fickle thing. We all want to believe there's something more intriguing and sinister to these reports, but it's likely just very advanced craft, or tech malfunctions causing them. The sheer number of reports coming out in the modern day means we probably would've made contact by now if this was an alien intelligence trying to land on earth.

cigar shape mothership. it has been seen in the past by a couple of witness all around the globe. Sometimes, witnesses has seen smaller ufos (looking like little light globes) going inside that shape, just before the 'cigar' went into space. That is why we believe they are mother ships of some kind whom are able to go even faster in the void of space. it is like a navy carrier who can more securely or comfortably transport these small ufos from one point in space to another.

There is math surrounding this point. This channel covers it. Its not naive.

Well that's just how quantum mechanics is. The behavior of matter and light on a subatomic and atomic level is just very strange for us just like quantum entanglement, quantum zeno effect, quantum tunneling and quantum cryptography among many other quantum problems just like the double slit experiment.

Nature dictating observation is our norm at our scale, it's what we expect. The double slit is like realising that you can look up nature's skirt and pick what colour underwear she's wearing.

@@user-mp3eh1vb9w We're only scratching the surface of the quantum universe. It's still a fairly new discipline, prone to many varied, unproven theories. We don't even know what exactly we don't know, yet.

The double-slit experiment has always been my favourite - always boggles the mind. And I've been a scientist for 50+ years. Another note - why is it that the individual experiences of many thousands (millions?) of people who have witnessed or interacted with craft or beings is always dismissed? I saw a craft doing impossible manouvres as a child, while with my family who all saw it. Even today with drones and such, the movements are still "impossible" in our physics, and I've heard many similar reports from disparate sources going back decades. This is such a common experience, yet because not recorded or repeatable, and we're not USAF pilots, is not accepted as any "real" evidence. We know it was real, why would that not be seen as evidence? Qualitative rather than quantitative, accepted in other fields of science these days.

@@anitapeura3517 As you said, because it performed "impossible" manouvres and the physics we know today are not capable of doing that. It's like saying you saw an angel descend from the heavens, some people will believe it while some will not. The topic about UFO or UAP now is still a topic of such stigma that it is shunned. As long as the government actually confirms what these 'UAP's' are, a lot of people will not believe it. Why? Simply because it doesn't affect the general populace. Even if they are aliens, they are not disrupting the daily lives of the common men. Sure, some people will see impossible things but thats all there is to it. Ever wonder why paranormal sightings by both old and younger people are not taken seriously? Because it dwells with the same topic such as 'aliens' and cannot be proven with the scientific method.

It was a drone. Alien aircraft don't have AC lights.

I've had a similar experience during the day, the damn thing was so fast and low that I couldn't whip my head fast enough to follow it. I live near a military base.

How do you know it was low altitude?

Saw something very similar about a year ago! Small spherical reflective object cut across the sky in about 10-15 seconds. It was very high up. Asked some engineers about it and they said even an "orbital MLS" wouldn't travel that fast. It seemed to "wobble" along its path, which at that speed would cause structural failure in any conventional craft.

@@vagrant1943 How do you know how high up it was?

There weren’t such flying wings in numbers to account for what he saw. And such rudimentary flying wings could not have flown at such high speeds or performed the maneuvers he talked about. It’s a plausible ad hoc hypothesis, but it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

Look into Cattle mutilation, animal mutilation, half cat phenomen, even human mutilation, and you will realize being watched is not the problem!

I've already forgotten the details now but I thought Mick West did a thorough debunking of it.

@@twonumber22 I don't see how he could have. Multiple ships tracked them on radar doing things that shouldn't be possible. Four pilots observed the object up close doing things that should be impossible. Then they got it on infrared doing things that should be impossible. There's just too much collaborating evidence.

@@daniele4568 I do remember one or more of the pilots not knowing their own equipment very well, and making a false assumption because of it.

@@twonumber22 Oh, I think that was a different guy. There were four pilots flying together that saw it, and one was a Top Gun instructor.

the whales lmao... had me dying

I think prior to WW2 we were a sort of sight-seeing tourist destination, but then we started nuking things and the galactic council restricted access to just scientific missions mostly around military assets

If they are here for the whales, Mr Shatner should be involved, he is quite experienced in that field.

It only takes one of the countless highly credible UFO incidents to be real for the ET Hypothesis to be a likely explanation. It’s for this reason that I lean towards covert ET visitation being the reality behind this phenomenon. Covert observation is also very probable given that we have nothing of value to offer them and would be more of a liability than an asset to them in an open contact scenario. The only value we can provide is that of research subjects and nature documentary level entertainment.

I think I believe you. Where and when did you see it and seriously do you think it was man-made or not?

@@user-kf7kp6ev4t Saw it in a place called Barmouth on the west coast of Wales one perfect summer evening in the early "nineties". I never saw anything like it before so "man-made" was out of the question. I will always recall it as if it happened yesterday but what else can i say.....a wonderful memory.

@@colinjohnrudd Did it have any wings, propellers and propulsion like an airplane or helicopter? And did it make any sound and create turbulence in the air around it? Sry my bad english. Thanks :)

@@user-kf7kp6ev4t No wings, no propellers, no propulsion..... silent, serene and silver (after the colour change which was instant) and straight into the sea ..... or over the horizon, absolutely amazing sight and very fast.

@@colinjohnrudd How old were you when you saw that UFO that you can detail about it now? I'm just a curious about UFO phenomena and just want a serious answer.

Either that or our planet is bein mapped by alien drones, who are just waiting for us to destroy ourselves so they can harvest the planet

They are seeking out intelligent life forms, we are far form being considered intelligent

Intelligent life is probably rare enough that it's interesting to study. Their cultures will be vast - we're only seeing the slice that care to study us - the scientists. It's not like they've got a version of James Cameron flying down to earth with a 3D camera

@@glennquagmire1747 Why would they even seek out intelligent life when they can simulate natural evolution with vastly powerful computers?

@@dangerfly - Why play a game on a retro console when you can emulate one? The real thing holds greater appeal for us. Perhaps it does for them too.

Why?

@@kyjo72682 With the age, vastness and complexity of the universe if we ended up the first/only intelligent species that would be very profoundly perplexing and scary.

​@@DigitalDeath88 I don't think trying to avoid scary things is the correct scientific method of investigation.. :D Scale is one thing.. distance is another. Yes, observable space is huge, and the non-observable part may be infinite. But the question is how often does a cloud of interstellar hydrogen transform into huge multicellular organisms with brains composed of trillions of cells capable of abstract intelligent thought. :) My guess is not very often which means the average distance between such occurrences may be very large. Easily beyond the cosmological horizon..

@@kyjo72682 Not what I said, meant or even implied at all, where are you pulling this from?

Yeah it would be way weirder if we were the only ones given just how insanely big the universe is and how many habitable planets exist for the formation of life.

​@AquaFyre-xq9go Actually, Fermi's Paradox says they should be here. I don't know if they are... But if they are, we didn't detected them yet.

@Aqua Fyre Yeah? How about we toss in the Drake equation and toss out the illogical 'scientism' that pervades the Academy.

@AquaFyre-xq9go Nope, that's not his question. His question was "if they exist, where are they?". Meaning that they should be here because, even traveling under the speed of light, it would've passed time enough for a civilization to colonize the whole Milky Way. Search and read more about it, you're going to get it. BTW, it's not even a freaking paradox! It's a really interesting, fundamental, question... But not a freaking paradox.

@Aqua Fyre The point is, there's stuff happening all the time all over the world. Saying that it is impossible and therefore ball lightning or swamp gas is not science - that's scientism. Science is actually happening now on this subject - Galilleo Project being my least favorite but the most known of these endeavors. The breakdown of the peer review process has nothing to do with UFOs. Last I heard, there wasn't a Critical UFO Studies curriculum in between the Gender Studies and Fat Studies departments.

@@MCsCreations EDITED as i originally thought you were addressing me and not Fyrefest. i've seen pretty much all of JMG's Event Horizons and his Fermi Paradox series over the last couple of years, as well as listening ad nauseum to Sean Carroll, Brian Greene and the endless lists of scientists with opinions and credentials. And I agree with you about colonizing the Milky Way and beyond. One would think that they'd be everywhere. They are called von Neumann probes (the self-replicating little f%^&ers). Yet, I can also think of dozens of reasons why they are already here. Or not here but could be still. Or have been here. Or do come here and are intercepted first. It's impossible not to anthropomorphize, but let's at least try a little bit.

Well if you read the government investigation documentation you'll find that the possibilities go further than that. OK, yes it could be man-made, and yes it could be astmsopheric. But it also could be psychological -- an aspect of our consciousness, something we all "synchronously imagine". The idea is maybe our perception controls reality more than we think -- maybe the we only "notice" the physical effects because of a sort of hive-mind consciousness that sometimes generates anomolous perceptions. (Yes this has been seriously considered). The other option is of course that it's extraterrestrial. But that option splits into more options. Drones? Or piloted craft? Remotely piloted, or with beings inside? Physical craft, or simulated effects? We simulate sounds, scents, and appearances to hide our presence as we observe other animals. Who's to say aliens might not be simulating the appearance of a craft, simulating the water disturbances, simulating the radar effects, to obscure their presence while they do their observations? A lot of interesting possibilities to consider!

Decades of “it’s not happening” and now “it’s happening and we don’t know why”. Definitely troubling.

​​@@DeltaDanner fr, somethings up

Be careful for what you wish for. I had a Lazar ‘sport model’ fly over my house in the U.K. at 1,000 feet one evening in the 70’s. Only saw it for 4 secs between low broken cloud but it changed me forever. It’s a poison chalice. You can’t get the image out of your head. Been down this rabbit hole for over 50 plus years.

I’ve heard a few tales from our rural folk… There is a particular ridge where occasionally you will see glowing objects that move through the pines and eventually rise above the pines and fly away… Kids used to go out and wave their cellphones to them… 🤷

I saw something comparable, in the clear night sky in the countryside of the north of France, i often like to gaze at the stars and focus at every moving thing. One night, i saw this little white dot, akin to the usual satellite orbiting the earth, but brighter and much faster. Around 2/3rds of the way of the visible sky, it did a clean 180 degree turn without slowing down and disappeared. So far it’s the only thing i’ve seen that I can’t explain. At this speed nothing can change direction that way.

@@Raptor3388 How do you know how fast it was going if you don't know how far away it was or how large it was?

@@chrisbarnett5303 i never said i knew the speed or distance, just that it was moving faster than how satellites move in the sky. And even if it was tiny and close, this kind of 180 turn would be only possible if the device is on rails.

Every one has an opinion This may be of some interest. I take photos of objects/UFOs in our skies and near our moon. On one of these occasions in 2019 I was taking a video of the moon, stopped the video and turned to go indoors. I took one step and stopped dead, I saw two overly bright twinkling stars that were very close together and appeared to be well withn our atmosphere. Within two seconds the one to the left moved slowly away, as If it realised I had become aware of them. I turned my camera on and took a photo as it moved away, when I looked back for the other so called star it had vanished. After watching the so called star move away I would estimate it to be no more than a quarter of a mile away. The photo I took appeared as fuzzy light. On another occasion I took a video of what I thought was a star and accidentally caught an elongated craft on video. The video was taken towards the Hercules constellation on 27.05.19 at 1.20am.

Also the expense reports that show things like 10k for a toilet seat cover. They didn't buy a toilet seat cover, they bought warp drive fuel, but they can't report that.

@@CaptainMisery86 Yes! That’s exactly what I’ve been saying! I understand the desire to want it to be aliens, but the much more reasonable conclusion is America’s out of control military spending. The idea it could be something else (rival or alien) also is a great excuse to keep spending insane amounts on defense! It all adds up in my book.

You seem to be convinced the money is being spent on secret technology and not going into the bank accounts of greedy humans.