>YFW bigbrow ungabunga's thiccer, take that chadbunga!

That feel when berry picker beta grunk

Was once tied to a chair while someone said this same thing to me. For a week.

Death by snu snu. The spirit is willing but the body is weak and spongy.

This is the worst comment I've ever seen

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

'''''''''''"'"""""'"""""''"""""''"'"'"'''"''''''"""""""""''''''''''""""''''''"""""""""""""""""""'"'"'''""'"''""'""'"""'"

......................................................................................................................................

stop

no, let me- *keep getting far away*

fellow female human woman, I take one look at that nasal cavity and start drooling

I just wanna be happy.

@Slooshy Chill dude, the comment is a joke, so is the video. Human preferences change largely on environment, you don’t gotta be a 10 foot Neanderthal for someone to love you. People mistake the idea of modern “attractiveness” with the actual need to survive back 100,000 years ago.

@@CaptainGrat75 I was being ironic mane

Are you quoting Broly?

what fr lmao

@@zek1405 Svante Pääbo discovered that we share a lot of DNA with neanderthals and won a nobel prize for it this year

Holy fking shit, you are right, Svante Pääbo discovered that Neanderthals contributed to roughly 5 percent of the modern human DNA. Which is definite proof of early cross-breeding, but only with the Eurasians.

@@kingtreedede7303 how unfair 😔

@@kingtreedede7303 The DNA sharing thing is long known (since 2010, so even by the time the video was made) but it's only 2% or so, so not "a lot". Nobel Prices don't get awarded instantly.

Here's the thing, it didn't happen. I saw another comment here which entirely disproves this

neanthertals werent inferious, in fact they were proubaly superiour, but its the sole reason that we were better a reproducing that we got the edge

No, this means our species is a mix of several humanoid species creating hybrids. Our species wasn't cucked by neanderthals, our species was created because sapiens were getting cucked by neanderthals. It wasn't our species developing in tansania and then conquering the earth, our species developed by migration.

@@ice9232 what comment

@@sasukeuchiha7320 dawg I entirely forgot💀

In more ways than one.

Underrated comment

@@rubym6178 y e s

yes

yes

MCDOOGALS

He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

@@laecard1778100% does not have friends

@@laecard1778I ain’t reading allat. It’s not that serious

@@casethegreat7586 I take misinformation very seriously.

Thanks for the info!

What is your take on the domestication of the dog? I got into a huge argument with an anthropology grad student, he was saying dogs were domesticated 12K years ago like every other animal, and I was trying to make my point of how I think it's closer to 50K and he was just being such a pompous donkey's rear-end.

No you obviously don’t. He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

​@@laecard1778 Oh look what I found... I see a hater!

@@Corvusripper343 I am just telling the truth. If you have substantive criticisms of my comment I encourage you to share them.

If their age is on the wristwatch they're about to make my wrist launch.

Vilhelm Vestergaard Mursal Bad for you, I can switch to 24 hour time

@@tfwspecificname you're both going to hell .

prophetic0311 correct

@@gamerofwar99 you can't get off to anyone under 100? *is a spud that uses digital clocks.

chikin man Ah darn, and I was planning on stalking him too!

David -flamingsword1 stalking*

what? thats where he'll be

Well now I have an excuse

holyshit you actualy checked

nope. not quite

There's more to it than that, but yeah not entirely wrong.

He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

@@laecard1778 tldr please

@@laecard1778 hey mate you're replying to a year old comment referencing how someone last year got a nobel prize for this exact theory, not making your own comment, also its a joke

@@britishgaming6 1. No, nobody has gotten a Nobel Prize for that theory, you are literally just making shit up. 2. People are clearly still seeing my responses so what is your point here?

Andrew Lesniak 2019 throwing crumpled singles while furiously jerking off

@@gabbidurham me neither man, me neither...

2019: No dick, no fap

2020: Damn, she kinda cute tho

2021: Damn boi I thicc

Nope

F

Maybe they got a million dollar price

no it hasn’t

@@tori5315 look it up on Google earth. Just from the street, you can see that there is no sign on the front and nothing inside.

Sexy!

oh may god this guy's a legend

No you weren’t. Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens intermixed to a small extent, that is literally all that’s true, the rest in this video is garbage. He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

They probably seen this and said he seems legit, lets go with it until we think of something else. Lol

Yes.

If you have type O negative blood, you have Neanderthal ancestry.

@@bunnieskitties293 Uhoh

Yep

@@bunnieskitties293 isn't o negative like the universal blood type tho

My friend did that

It's plausible their integration into early human society forced out most of their relatively solitary and hunting focused lifestyle, as those traits lead to the extinction to the Neanderthals who hadn't integrated, with their larger bodies requiring more energy that sometimes can't be reclaimed and solidarity meaning less people to help when they need it, eventually proved too much for the slightly less intelligent Neanderthals, phasing out the unnecessary behavior in later generations until they can no longer be classified as separate from early humans while killing off the stragglers.

You could say they... Went out with a bang. *_Y Y Y E E E E E E E E E A A A A A A A A A A H_*

@@wingedbluj1674 Hold onto your butt, 'cuz it seems the small number of things we thought Cro Magnons did that Neanderthal's didn't actually were done by both. Less than a month ago it was discovered that a remarkably well preserved body of a neanderthal had string stuck under one of his fingernails, and was apparently broken off from his clothing. So their intelligence is now being commonly interpreted as indiscernibly close to contemporaneous humans.

Death by snu snu

No, the only thing the Video has in common with the actual science is that Homo Sapiens and neanderthals interbred to some extent, the rest is mostly garbage.

I mean that fact that most people have some degree of Neanderthal DNA would seem to indicate there was some interbreeding.

@@kingbaguette1843 It's not "most people". Pretty sure it was somewhere around 5-10%.

@@thewanderingmistnull2451 I think you’re mixing up the numbers a little. It’s not 5-10% of people have some Neanderthal DNA, it’s the average person has 5-10% Neanderthal DNA (realistically more like 3-4%).

🤓

It didn’t gain any respect. All that gained respect is that Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens intermixed to a small degree, all the rest in this video is pure garbage. He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

Yes, they are hot

nice profile pic

RichConnerGMN thank u I designed it

@@lesbianage9538 pog

"But you didn't say you wouldn't!"

Chad Thundercock *Chadantherthal vs Virginsapien

Prehistoric incels

LMAO

burgesso do caralho Time has been wild as of lately. I still remember when Ugandan knuckles wasn't shit.

"Am watch where going!" "Wh-wha- ...sorry? Lance?" "AM BE SORRY!"

That's a actually plausible sounding Theory and that's one the worst part of it. For once we humans didn't kill off a species. We fucked off one-

It’s fine people proved it any ways

@@wetsocks347 So... we told them to fuck off.... literally.

Neanderthals did not die because of humans, the most practical and plausible theory is that their diet mainly consisted of plants. The main reason why humans survived is because we discovered fire to cook food, which helped humans grow smarter and smarter, and the protein from cooked meat gave us more energy and power. Neanderthals never got this advantage, causing their species to never grow.

s

Thank you for the input, Don Cheadle

hey, its don cheadle!

Hey it’s Don Cheadle!

696 likes lmao

No way it’s the don cheadle from America’s greatest anime Corey in the House

unironically true

Neanderthals were humans.

@A lone Cockroach that actually makes no sense and simulaniously makes sense, a paradox!!

@Timothy ParksII me?

A lone Cockroach isn’t there evidence to suggest that we actually came from male Homo sapiens and female Neanderthals?

Source?

No way

Yo wtf?

thanks for the sauce also nice profile pic

It says it was published on 2011lmao

I like your pfp lmao

This was a legit thing that happened in the Victorian era, some mom washed her babies diaper in a well. Then a shit ton of people died.

Alis Dillon link please?

Lol

Sounds more biological, given the time period

SCIENTIST: and sam onelas theory the SEXY NEANDERTHAL TEORY

Don’t think that was the original name

@@piglin469 btw he didn’t come up with it. It was proposed in 1907

@@cookiecakeeater6340 He did. The theory as to why interbreeding took place. Not the overarching theory as to why the Neanderthals disappeared.

@@elyria9788 I doubt he was the first ever person to think of this

pff how would you collect yours, pick it out of a cereal box? collect in person like some kind of peasant? ;)

pff, that would be beta. he wants it sent to his favourite strip club. check the adress, it's McDoogal's strip club.

Hes already got too many abyway

Why the fuck would he want to make his nobwl prize collection beginner

i think he is ded

just about as valid as any other prehistory theory TBH

I'd probably f*ck a neanderthal

pretty sure my anthro prof said something like this

Anyone want to start a Wiki page?

It is. I took an anthropology class and they said this happened. They have clues however suggesting that a hybrid from neanderthal male and homo sapiens female was fertile but not the homo sapiens male with a neanderthal female

Did your teacher agree or disagree?

I also went into a rant about this. This is so stupid it’s just plain depressing how many stupid people actually take this seriously.

lmfao honestly they probably could have prevented that by stating some dude pulled a prank inn the google reviews.

McDoogals Gentlemen's Club

I'm not sure if the 1-star reviews were from this video. I'm from that area and it's pretty well known that McDoogal's is a shithole. That whole area is pretty shitty overall.

Sounds like gen z

So two things were banged into oblivion due to Neanderthals huh?

Proof that even pre-history ancestors have popular taste for BBW.

He was mistaken about our beauty standarts wasn't he?

would fap again

Ravethecat12 dense*

+Applus Tuditanus Yes he is

😂

Yo sup

Awesome, now pick up a book.

Hello

@@jessicaevans7847 What does that even mean?

It was more likely to be a fertility symbol rather than pornography.

Rex Appleby but she thicc tho

not just ancestors: cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/LpuzpNf6Q7_7h0fdJ5nkRdvkDQw=/1400x1400/filters:format(png)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9683323/Aquaman1.png

@@rexappleby4731 it doesn't mean that everyone would treat it as such.

@@rexappleby4731 stfu thicc queen

@@Snaggledorf42 they can slice the cake as thinly as they like, i still call it "cake". fact is, these weren't different "species" of human, they were different "breeds", what we refer to as "races".

brian sorum, looks like youtube says you dont deserve to be heard. to them you're just sub-human. your comment is not visible.

The thing is so powerful, it has it’s own gender

take that *binary **_gender s y s t e m_*

ollie_goria Sam O’nella accounts for all 42,069 genders

I am all 739728293939302783938849.967 genders, the .967 is still a theory

That a lot of damage

joel scott dude the strip club is gonna be confused as fuck

grymmlyn "Goddamit Gina haven't I told you not to bring all your personal shit to work"

He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

Sam Dragonborn good for you.

That's actually really neat.

Was she hot?

Nah, not particularly, she wasn't completely hideous either though, just sorta meh

Sam Dragonborn Well, makes sense.

They created the BBW tag before it was thing

Big Bouncy Women

icewolfcub 48562007 Big Blue Waffle

Humans haven't changed I see.

To Salmonella and everyone in this thread: Venus of Willendorf was, in all likelihood, made by a woman. In fact, most early sculpture was likely made by women: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/43e1/b131f34eec69efa14c02aac4922f00302a1e.pdf

Izol I looked it up I was like did he just dox himself oh wait that’s a *STRIP* club

@@thundrbaze *_Strop_*

That Video Guy I love going to *strop* clubs and making it rain on *stroppers*

@@thundrbaze *_s t r o p_*

Izol yoooo I actually live super close to this place tho 😬

Nose flop

He literally contradicts his own premises. First he claims that men just go for as many women as they can get. Then he says that Neanderthal men would just go after Homo Sapiens women, leaving only the Neanderthal women for the Home Sapiens men instead of going for them as well. He also responds to the argument that a Neanderthal appearance is generally considered very unattractive by women with sexual attraction just being something cultural open to change, and so you can’t extrapolate these things into the past. Before proceeding to do literally exactly that, rephrasing certain Neanderthal features in a deceptive way to gloss over the fact that the whole package is, again, considered unattractive. He also fundamentally doesn’t understand how evolution works. If Neanderthal traits gave men such a big advantage evolution would have selected *for* them, not *against* them, which is what happened in reality. If he was right we should all be Neanderthals. And of course he also completely ignores that humans generally don’t and didn’t pick their mates by having all men randomly beat the crap out of each other and then all the women just bang the strongest guy. They form large social groupings, form in- and outgroups, are territorial and generally practice some degree of monogamy. Humans aren’t Walruses. His „Theory“ is inconsistent with observable reality, the theory of evolution and even itself and it drives me nuts that so many people literally do not process the claims a garbage You Tube video makes.

ben shapiro is my hero Sam actively writes history because he’s canon to real life. He’s basically god

He had his women stolen by Neanderthals back in the day and he said "yea? well jokes on you because in a bunch of millenia you'll all breed with out feminine females and become more feminine yourselves and then who's back at the top of the manliness tree? Sam, that's who!"

This could explain why he presents it in ways that even stupid young people could understand I guess. 😂😂

Wait he isn't a god?

If you are of European origin. You have Neanderthal dna.

Nobel prizes are not ever awarded posthumously.

Easily disproved

@@johnpattenden8553 what?

StesLight sadly while it’s a fun theory by Sam, most science suggests that female humans and male neanderthals found it incredibly hard to produce healthy offspring.

He really doxxed himself?

omg for real

Fax

HE BACK BOY

Where is he?

@@danielgomessilva8966 he’s back now. He was busy with school for a few years though.

Big Chicken is watching

Earth Mother goddess. Clan of the Cave Bear.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

@@quantashonjamaldigglerbury4934 same

I'd hit it

Same here

Don't worry he said on Reddit he would be posting again soon

Same I’m gonna go cry in a corner hoping that he’ll be back soon

@@jonasward5977 where he at then

@@jonasward5977 WHEN

There's no proof they were ever considered attractive though.

@@lusteraliaszero well there's no proof that they weren't

@@shadowasii4492 you can't prove a negative.

@@lusteraliaszero yes you can, by proving that they were considered attractive

@@shadowasii4492 one does not exclude the other. you didn't say universally.

@Temponyx Dinosaurs disliked that.

@Temponyx F

Press F for ****

MoffMupp DEATH ...by snu snu

@Temponyx F

Chad

I went through the comments to see if anyone had found the address. good work soldier

World famous mcdoogals It's an absolute shithole. When you think terrible strip club, mcdoogals checks all the boxes Source: actually been there

@@Jakezergling what's so terrible about it?

@@ahmetkerematakur4247 the women, BYOB, the venue is sketchy lookin, reeks

Raymond Smith Your sister knows, your sister knows...

John Cena She totally knows

maelgugi what

Raymond Smith It's a reference to a vid Sam O Nella did about surrealism... too bad he deleted it

Offroad circus unless you have quality within that quantity

Unfortunately, not so much. Quantity usually wins out over quality when it comes to reproduction. Even if your offspring are half as likely to reproduce, it doesn't matter if you make at least twice as many offspring. That said, the reason to focus on quality is ethical in nature.

Offroad circus q u a n i t i d d y

well... Adpocalypse says no

Offroad circus You spelled it “quanitity”. You tried, but no. Also, quanTITTY

Homo Sapiens had much larger frontal lobes, so would have dominated socially as con artists. Like trading symbolic trinkets for women, because Neanderthals can't grasp metaphor.

The heck is this spacing

That one dude some cuck thing i think

You know, the enter button exist?

@@halamadruuid2380 Pretty sure they weren't looking for the name. Pretty sure they were asking why it is there.

@@metta9743 dude...

This grossed me out and made me laugh at the same time

yummy

Sam O'Patella

I have actually had a girl be attracted to my kneecaps, so that's a point in favour of this theory 😂

@@kilgoretrout2878 lmao what the fuck 😂

Aretrix Il Lmao (Sarcasm)

I live in the Netherlands. The video still works if you read that

"That's odd, I thought Netherland was sexy as it is."

Aretrix Il rip

I always thought NetherLands was another name for Hell, lol.

So what if monkeys had guns..would they win a war?

More advanced weapons? I think the true cause was that we were able to operate in larger social groups and had better language/communication. One vs one, neanderthals WERE superior, but that ended working against them. They existed independently and thus formed smaller, more isolated groups. When humans came around, they were outnumbered. We won the competition for resources and they slowly disappeared into our gene pool.

@@xezazase Even more interesting facts: the Basque people and certain populations in Oceania have high neanderthal DNA. Basque also have the highest type O blood, also a neanderthal marker.

@@Sandi_shores_lands_fish we are not monkeys, if Neanderthals were given guns and put up against us, then yes they would.

Nah he is right because we were smaller and less strong we learnt to throw spears and attack from afar meaning we were a lot safer. Neanderthals instead used brute strength and would run up and stab the animal, putting themselves right next to danger and would mean they are more likely to get injured or killed. I also agree with sam though, all European people share a lot of neanderthal DNA, meaning that there was at least some interbreeding.

I guess.

Ziamangry *tens to hundreds of thousands of years ago

Thots always have been and always will be thots, regardless of time period.

Sooooo the Breen are neanderthals?

HaHarmageddonTV whut about the dinosaurs pretty sure their thots

HaHarmageddonTV Meanderthals probably were around at least 1 million yrs ago, even if their extinction happened recently as sub-100k years.

Sam O'Nella Academy I saw the original,I feel so special

Sam O'Nella Academy another nice video! Can the next one be on weird shit about North Korea?

I expect better from you son

Sam O'Nella Academy will you be putting out more frequent content since it's summer

Sam O'Nella Academy thanks papa

Trying to explain "tender" to a Neanderthal lowers life expectancy

@@gregoryvasilyev9675 Neanderthals were at least as intelligent as modern humans if not more. so they'd be the ones explaining.

@@peevshalpatine Hot take

@@Matzkxmx larger cranial cavity

@@peevshalpatine anything i wanna say would get me hate

Nope not that much bitch

@@buffoonustroglodytus4688 most europeans and asians have a significant amount of neanderthal DNA, sub-saharan africans do not.

@@dionysus8967 k.

@@buffoonustroglodytus4688 I'm sorry for you if that is too much for your little brain lol

@@buffoonustroglodytus4688 I’m curious if you realize Neanderthals and Homo Sapien interacted to create the Homo sapien sapien (our current human species) so yes, it makes total sense the Neanderthals just interbreeded with us

it used to be a strip club i think lol

U have to hate ur friends to be friends take the roasts and roast them back

my friends already do that.

@@T0YCHEST I agree, if I can't call my buddies retards at least 5 times a day, then they aren't friends

Go for it mate! I'm going to show this my 21 year old niece who just started studying Biology. Either she will laugh because she freaking likes it or she will laugh because of how nutty I am. ^^

@@thomaskositzki9424 How did that go?

@Red October I agree completely

It would even explain the simp culture :D

Actually, there are humans right now with some Neanderthal traits, so it could make sense

y e s

No your just smart