Yep.

Yeah I was just gonna leave the same comment

Correct. And you can tell she noticed it. She backtracked and then did the typical women thing of standing still with her head down hoping it would miss her. Lol

@@newjokeaccount woman thing my ass I would have ducked

@@newjokeaccount She lived right?

Glad I looked for someone to bring it up before I bothered trying to explain that

It was so fake they didn't even realize they said that the pentagon was in Washington DC which it not

15:18 I agree with Dave on the whole thing of bad timing... But one question about the Flight 93 phone calls have always tickled my brain... I have NEVER been in an airplane at any sort of cruising altitude where my phone sent an received phone calls, nevermind the fact that it was 2001 pcs phone technology that needed proximity to towers for good calling. And Congress hadn't passed the laws to amend the FAA rules for wireless communication so there was no inflight Wi-Fi and couldn't be VoIP. And then you add to that where they were in the sky relative to the ground when these calls were supposed to have been placed, (rural Pennsylvania, dozens of miles from civilization). How did these calls get placed? These just continue, 20 years on, to be a few of the boldfaced unanswered questions in my mind.

@@StfuFFS she’s also remarkably clam considering her impending doom

@@StfuFFS Are you old enough to have used cell phones at that time? AMPS systems actually had much better range than current digital systems. The range was even better once you got up in the air (below a certain elevation). The problem with analog cell phones though is that the quality of the call was often pretty crappy. There's also the fact that only 2 of the calls from Flight 93 were from cell phones. The rest of the calls we made using the Airfone that was in the back of every seat at that time. I won't get into the conspiracy of whether Flight 93 was real or not. I don't want that headache. It was definitely possible to place those phone calls though. Also, try turning your cell phone on while in flight now. I have been able to send and receive text messages quite a few times through the cell network.

@@StfuFFS I was born and raised in a city about 40 minutes away from where the plane crashed. We have about 150,000 people in the city, even more people back in that era. I've been to the crash site a few times, it's not "dozens of miles from civilization" lol, there's literally a town right down the road.

@@krayzy932 i was 30 on 9/11 and i worked in tech in Silicon Valley. The plane at the time of the calls was at 40,000 feet and the assumption that first class passengers would have analog phones in 2001 is laughably naive.

I totally missed that. Crap. I'm a political activist.

Uhhh the Pentagon is in fact on the border in Virginia

No. It's obviously the most outlandish thing somebody thought up...

weird but there's reason lie detector tests aren't allowed in court.

This is so basic, I can't imagine why it even made it on the list. Not only is it a small single prop plane, but it's dragging a giant banner behind it.

You beat me to it. I drove by an airport everyday for over a decade and I seen similar things a lot.

as anyone who's ever been to Mexico knows there's nothing more trustworthy than a Mexican police officers testimony.

🤣. So true then they show a flying woman. Way to cause controversy over the whole list.

It is not wind nor is it like birds. The video is simply fake. This phenomenon happens to birds because they hover when it is windy. The plane is different, as it has an engine that always propels it forward. Even if the plane's engine stopped it continues to go forward and would never stay still as we see in the video. We also don't see the plane shaking, if there was a very strong wind a small plane like a cessna or cirrus plane would always shake, the speed would decrease but it would never stop in the middle of the sky and be immobilized I've been a pilot for 10 years.

That video seems better n more interesting than anyyyy language class in hs 💀💀

From looking at his weird stuff I think someone was in trouble. He tried to talk over it. I hope whoever it is she is ok

was he white ???

Wait, you just said all this shady stuff about this guy and you still find him to be a credible character? The guy also asked for booze for payment for his time for this interview. It's in the same video.

If they were really being kept captive, I think the pleads for help would be more hysterical. I would be screaming at the top of my lungs over and over again til that interviewer came over.

On the same coin too many people are overly skeptical of obvious proven science because they are uneducated.

@@derpderpin1568 it's all just due to a lack of critical thinking skills, mostly due to laziness. It's a lot easier to believe what you want than to do the minimum amount of thinking about everything, I personally choose to lessen the amount of mental energy put towards stupid BS by not caring.

@@derpderpin1568 that doesn’t make sense. How can you be skeptical of something that is scientifically proven? Can you give an example?

@@derpderpin1568 On the same coin (that has three sides somehow), too many people are overly accepting of scientific facts and studies of which they have not actually looked into themselves, they are simply quoting what a media source has told them "a study has found this week". I have found that people who are overly into science and scientific procedures are often extremely dim witted in regards to street smarts which are a very real and significant thing especially for the creatures that we are, intelligent apes.

The worst thing about skeptics is they write off everything out of sheer fear. And don’t offer any other ideas as to what something could be out of laziness. Small, smooth, brains.

yes she said "im afraid" probably talking to another captive while explaining why she was making that call because they didn't know what was going to happen

Yeah. With a shitty microphone you can't always tell an f from an s.

Try this - next time you're on the highway (as a passenger for safety) take notice of a car traveling in the opposite direction (perfect would be seeing them about 1/4 mile away - AND - a 1/4 off to your side, but straight ahead coming up next to you kinda works as well)... Place a finger over said car and wait to see how long it takes for it to come back into view. W/ a steady hand, for a couple seconds, it will seem like that car is standing still although at a combined speed (you going 60mph, it going 60mph, it's coming at you at 120mph). The same effect with Planes keeping in mind Planes are HUGE making them seem much closer. You'd expect them to whip by you because they're going roughly 170mph (landing speed), but because they're a lot further away than you think it looks as if they're standing still for the 5 seconds or so you saw it.

Plus, it’s mainly really BASIC physics, too. Not saying everyone needs a ‘first’ from Oxford or anything…. Just a basic understanding like………..

@The Yorkshireman Reacts Right, especially a small single engine plane flying into headwinds WITH a deceptively heavy banner, creating significant drag. How is this not obvious?

I identify as a Physicist and I'm offended by your comment Sir.

@@Sudas80 You think the voices are what draws in the views? No. People click for the subject matter, then think “why does he talk like this?”. And I mean it takes a certain type of person with too much time on their hands to make one of these. The type of person that never leaves the basement. So it makes sense that most of them speak strangely since they never practice talking to other people.

I’m still waiting for the footage shot in super hi res

Unlike most people who just scream OMg WhAS tHAt A GhOST ahahshaahah

@@sneakylike333 EXACTLY! Which is why I love these guys.

@@aj897 No, it's being intellectually honest. Would it really be sensible to believe in witches for example based on that video just because we don't know exactly what it is?

@@TravisBickle0312 Bruhhh I know AJ... he believes in stuff like flat earth and even goes the whole hundred miles... penguins guarding the south pole etc...

I feel like it was obvious to me that it’s an animated video..? Like nothing had real texture

That's exactly something someone living in the matrix would say!! Just joking 😁

That's my general feeling is if you were an alien you'd be more likely to go to high priority spots like the Pentagon if you were going to go into a big city.

They've also been seen over parks and roads and the like as well. There are lots of videos, people have to look for them. Everyone expects the best footage to just be shown on all news networks 24/7 or something. Most of them are just uploaded by regular people and hardly get any views. I have a video of some over Denver, crap quality per usual, it was on a cellphone from 2011 in the dark from a moving car. Not everyone is set up to take professional HD video at the drop of a hat. The most HD looking ones are typically fakes anyway. "Low quality" is typically more of the real stuff. I've also seen one while in a cornfield. Hotspots are government and military places, but they've been spotted nearly everywhere. If you go looking for this stuff a bit deeper than typing "real ufo" into youtube and scrolling for a bit, there's a lot out there. Of course, we've been conditioned to be labeled a "ufo nut" or something if you've seen one or look for that stuff outside mainstream sources like TV shows and the news. And people wonder why there's "no evidence" lol.

could be that too

I'm more inclined to believe what an earlier commenter suggested, "I'm afraid".. I'd have to go back an listen again. It did sound like, "it's a frame" when I heard it in this video though. But not enough for me to jump onto that big of a conspiracy tangent. Still haven't heard any good ideas on what would even be the point of deplaning and then killing all the passengers that would have died anyway had you left them on the plane that you were going to crash.

It's also an edited video, the original was the Turkish president If I remember correctly and it was proven that the woman was edited into the video

@Miles Doyle miles wtf. cool story i guess, but stop doing shrooms.

@Miles Doyle May I suggest Blogger or Word Press?

911 was definitely also framed

She got hit by a wire.

You don't need a smartphone to record decent video.. digital video and still photo cameras existed in the 2000s. Analog handheld video cameras from the 80s had better quality than those flying witch shots. But I've no idea what was on the market in Mexico at the time.

Yes. They even bemoaned the fact that there wasn't enough noise in the background for her to be on a plane. If they removed them from the plane, they'd have taken their phones too. Pure nonsense.

@@ClayLoomis1958 agreed

I think what they were trying to say was that whoever is involved in the conspiracy(not the "terrorists") took the passengers off the plane, held them captive and made them record false voicemails to add as "proof" to the plane being hijacked when really it wasn't. She wouldn't have whispered the last bit unless that's the only thing she didn't want someone to hear, which if it was a hijacking you'd assume she would have whispered the whole time. I dunno, I'm just playing devil's advocate 🤣

If you wanted to indicate something was up, it makes more sense to say something like "tell little Susie I love her" and you don't know a Susie. Or "tell mom and dad I love them" and her parents have actually passed away. I know someone will say heat of the moment but I still feel like pretty much anything would be better than its a frame. I call bs on this one.

@@tobydude100 well if they removed them from the plane then that would mean none of them died which obviously isn’t true… still doesn’t make sense

You're right. It does look like drops of water.

Go watch the documentary soaked in bleach. It’s about this theory