I did

Me too!

Anyone not , everyone

Me three

⁹9⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹o9⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹9⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹9⁹9⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹9⁹9⁹9⁹9⁹⁹o9⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹⁹

How does it feel to know all the Einstein crap you learned is wrong?

Best of luck with your MBA.

​@@saltybits9954crap? Such as?

Yes, calling Einstein crap is a bit strong. His only major error was his “cosmological constant”, of which he termed his ‘greatest blunder’ There’s a strong temptation for people to welcome every claim that all historical discoveries are mistakes but if the maths holds with observations, we should accept theories that stand testing as with Einstein

@@DavidMcMillan888 That is not true. You can find a much more serious mistake in his photoelectric effect paper. It's just not well known, but it is very easy to spot.

Name an element...

He was a teacher of teachers. Esteemed university professors used to drop what they were doing and gatecrash his lectures, listening to the Master as if they were hearing concepts for the first time.

His true beauty was that he HAD a layman's mind, just one that worked to see more clearly, and one that would accept everything exactly as it was, not as he wished or assumed it to be.

You had really bad teachers then

@@saltybits9954 Why do you think he is a bad teacher? You have trouble following his arguments?

@@oogba71 I didnt say he was a bad teacher. Just a useful idiot. Thats what Tesla said about Einstein and all his ilk. I trust Tesla. He's right about everything. Einstein was an establishment pawn just like Feynman. Both idiots. Both wrong. Both guilty of crimes against humanity for lies and deception of the highest order.

If any man deserves to reach a triple digit age, it was Dr. Richard Feynman... R.I.P. a priceless individual.

THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA. Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA. The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great. NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 It has been proven that light is NOT a constant. Therefore E=MC² is false. Just like Tesla said. Einstein useful idiots.

@@saltybits9954 Frank also thinks that energy and electromagnetism IS gravity lol. Gravity isn't a thing, it's a consequence. If E=MC^2 was the same as F=MA then nothing about relativistic movement makes sense. For example, Mercury's orbit no longer makes sense. But Einstein's relativity allowed us to make accurate predictions about Mercury's orbit, something that was not possible before.

@@frankdimeglio8216 Nup

. .

.p P .

I just found out about the field today definitely a extremely difficult field these lectures are a helpful and I’m very thankful for them.

There are no geniuses in science today. Only useful idiots like Feynman. Tesla warned us about the establishment lies.

Too much puffed upness in todays "scientists".

Except that what he is teaching here is not true and his textbooks are full of trivial mistakes. ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 why did you touch her ?

@@stevefromsaskatoon830 Why are you projecting? ;-)

Thanks for your comment you my friend have also describe him with simple words and elgant precision, so he most probably be proud of every one of us for listening his lectures wondering like little kids and trying to comprehend this awesome and complex universe apparently govern by statistics......😁👌

Which is funny because Hans Bethe says he speaks like a bum and a thug.

Hold u to that gonna watch 25mins lol

Brilliant didn't understand neither now it's get s crazy lol 👍

Yh no 1 understand s it lol

I haven't heard many historical discussions about the GED but massive amounts of teens already know about it and shouldn't be forced to take it. It's actually not as hard to achieve as you may think.

There is no "level", any one can view this and get much from it.

@@thomaswayneward You must be at Stanford, MIT, or MSU. 99.9999% of population does not even know that there "IS" a QED vs QCD theory. Then there are GUTS and TOES. These deserve their own exposes on KZfaq. Send links to these, if you find some good ones. Bruno.

That was apart of what is called the "Feynman Technique" of learning. Basically if you can't explain any complex topic in simple terms you do not understand it well enough.

That was a lot of fake news, kid. ;-)

Name one I can start?

you tube needs to have a playlist of all these lectures. i would love any links any of you have

@@LouAlvis - Use the KZfaq 'Search box'.

"Magician" is a good label for him. Spent the past three days digging into his background and confirmed what I already suspected. His cult of genius comes from social acceptance without any criticism. There is a FOIA request available online that contains a 400 page FBI report on Feyman from the 1950s and declassified in 1989.

I thought is was great that I finally found out what the math, I couldn't understand, was trying to say!

He was also a sex maniac. How do I know that fact? From his own autobiography.

He kept my attention, which is difficult for any teacher...

All who can get youtube can find this :)

Well, he spent a bunch of time at the Gentleman's clubs.

Somebody ought to keep an ion you.

now I'm drawing my life's Feynman Diagram

Also viewing life choices as Arrows and trying to make the arrows add up to something rather than ultimately canceling out. - Beautiful !

Agreed. Don't we all wish that?

I am in 2022

@@chrisjeneson3763 tell him Chris.

You do, now!

Understatement

If you had had teachers like Feynman you wouldn't believe in superstitions (child of god??)

Raphael? Seriously I like harsh truth ☺️

In other words, if you had more teachers with more information about the universe, you would have more information about the universe. Yes. I certainly agree.

Feynman was part of a committee that made the findings.

G'day, Kristen Sorensen! Yes, I remember first listening to the book being read on radio back in 1980's ("Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman") and some years after that, actually reading the book in print. He bought some rubber O rings and placed one into a glass of ice water provided at the committee sessions when the Challenger disaster was being investigated. Great read! There is also an amusing and interesting section on the difficulty in learning the Japanese language, which Feynman tried for a while.

Darth Nihiluz dude... You're a dark lord of the sith. I assume you already know what he's talking about

And you have NOTHING of value or truth.

Light doesn't work by probability, but keep guessing. ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 so Richard Feynman is wrong. Go away twat.

@@justincase4812 Even he didn't say he was right, only that this explanation and its calculations work better than any others, and to the accuracy with which we can currently (1990 and 2023?) measure.

truly !

Alan Watts! 'A disreputable epicurean.' That was his own rather generous description of himself. More a disreputable charlatan, alcoholic philanderer who couldn't embody any of the nonsense that he purported to be true.

You can always read his science papers. I know... that takes work. ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 I genuinely don't know what you mean by that unless you're referencing the fact that he said that he won't really die as he's told so many stories that he'll still be remembered.

@@tikkiwich9700 He is dead. You can still find out what he was thinking when he was alive. That's all.

They clearly taught you how to say absolutely nothing of importance using a lot of irrelevant words. ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 Thanks for your comment, "Professor".

​@@KpxUrz5745 You got my attention, anyway. Isn't that what you came here for? ;-)

@@schmetterling4477 Nothing of the sort. I simply made a comment like millions and millions of other people do. I haven't the foggiest idea why you focused in on my comment. My main point was to praise my excellent high school teachers, and to point out the possible irony of the fact that the skill of teachers does not necessarily increase as one goes up the educational ladder.

@@KpxUrz5745 It is true that millions and millions of people want attention by posting nothing of value on the internet. :-)

Why are you telling us that you didn't pay attention in school? We don't care. ;-)

I think he was saying that fir effect. The prefix nano was adopted by scientists in 1947, so the word nanometer was certainly available in 1979.

@@brentfodera377 Well yes I think it may be done for effect BUT didn't he rather shoot himself in the foot since 4 100,000,000ths of a cm = 0.4nm and 400 1,000,000ths of a cm = 4,000nm ! Both wrong! He should have said "Four hundred (slight pause) millionths of a millimetre" . Sorry but genius though he was, he made a mistake here and my point about the pitfalls of dumbing down stands. My admiration for Feynman is not diminished but he needed posthumously calling out on this!

It's not clear just how much he contributed, though. He himself is playing it down, if anything.

You are clearly too much on the internet and not enough in the library. ;-)