Me too

The Unified Field problem has a solution finally: [m=E/(c*c) where E=∞=God] mass=Energy divided by the speed of light squared, where Energy=Infinity=God. My book "The Nature of Energy" is coming out this year, verifying the Planck hypothesis. Max Planck revolutionized our understanding of atomic and subatomic processes; he said this about matter and the existence of God as the source of everything: “As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.” (Max Planck, The Nature of Matter speech Florence, Italy 1944) The Big Bang: "The Supreme Being is the omnipresent energy who always was and always will be. In His purity and benevolence, the almighty One had existed alone for eons in contentment. Being creative, God wanted to share the joy of existence and have another soul around so there could be interaction and conversation. Being omnipresent He felt no sense of borders for He was already in existence everywhere. He is all-powerful so He could not create an equal entity; the first soul created would have to be a lesser being, one able to travel, arrive at set points to experience suffering and adventure. God said `Let there be light ` then there was light and God saw that the light was good. He called the light Yeshua (Jesus Christ): the messiah would do His work and carry the Word. God never takes physical form but the light could be both a wave and particle to walk the material plane for Him. Angelic souls were brought into existence, but they lacked depth of character from never experiencing suffering. A third of the angels split away with Lucifer the proud Archangel who rebelled against God, the angels loyal to God were given set tasks and functions. Angels are non material beings; at times higher ranking Archangels Michael and Gabriel can be sent to appear before the human race temporarily in material form. The messiah's experiences would consist of the struggle among the human race between good and evil. Add to Heaven the music of passion...Classical masterpieces of Mozart and the Blues of Leadbelly, for all events, all moments, all intentions of independent souls would be recorded and sorted for Afterlife joy. In the beginning of the plan for a physical universe in which physical beings could share the joy of existence God put together the countless codes, formulas, programs, and streams of energy that would bring about an environment suitable for physical life forms. The Universe, the material plane, came into existence by God`s will and was set into motion by a powerful blast of sound that sent vibrations out at many frequencies. These signals would settle as matter interacting with life forms through the universal Buddha Christ consciousness - the mediator. No one has been to Heaven or Hell yet; these are still under construction and will be ready when they are needed - all souls reincarnate over and over until Judgment Day. God states that He made life from the raw material of love. The Creator would continue to create because matter wears out and decays; the vibration would fade eventually as He designed the Universe so that better futures would develop over time. Existence tumbled into the void. The loop was at the end of the cosmos; the last event; the withering separation of light into weak & strong nuclear energies. Gravity, the powerful sister, stood helplessly by - the vacuum stole its grasp on the disappearing particles. Her yielding attractive brother, the electromagnetic host of awareness gently listened to the strings and contemplated the music of the dying universe to its last vibrating strand. Gravity became a notion - a call for assistance, and then was joined by the timid host to turn the oscillating loop around. They were the Yin and the Yang, substantial and insubstantial seeking an inhabited pinpoint to direct, one of six types of quark that could cause light to shine as a plume of electrons to feed the build-up of energy created by the movement between the two realms of being and non-being where dimensions meet. The absolute imperative, the Creator made some changes, allowing chaos and attraction to touch. By His will and His Word, the explosion of existence roared; vibrations sprang forward on a data-filled river of time." (copyright Patrick Boardman, 2020) The debate is over.

@@folkblueswriter Yup, you figured it out. God did it. That took me about 3 seconds. Why not say sky fairy or space magician. The god of the gaps argument is superstition, not science. I'm sure your book will be awesome. Chapter 1: God did it. The End.

emf 1200 - I don’t understand this attitude to divine explanations. Why are some people so eager to jump to supernatural conclusion without having any solid foundation for doing so. No maths, no experimental data, no theoretical framework. How do they feel intellectually satisfied that they have the best available answer? Even string theory offers a better explanation than a divine one. How can one process all the available data and firmly land on a divine explanation?

@@souldreamer9056 They do so through a fundamental rejection of the power of science and then go on to allay their fears by creating a nice sounding fairy tale. Religion makes sense as a tool to protect the human mind from the certainty of death. I believe that is why many people are drawn to it. There are more damaging aspects to the cult of religion to be sure (it's really just another form of control) but as I said earlier, I think most of the allure is the promise of a blissful forever after.

Ma men!

Good point there, heh :)

I was about to make a similar comment. What a perfect final question :)

And he would appreciate the correction.

Exactly! Dr. Thomas Sowell has choice words about editors, which he feels are a very low form of life. He's had manuscripts gathering dust on a publisher's desk, simply because he refused the butchery of some hack editor. tsowell DOT com/About_Writing.html (scroll down to the section on Editing)

watch Lawrence Krauss for a very funny guy who knows his shit:)

Of course, its called entropy:)

Agree ;)

There are no electrons in that experiment. It's an experiment with light. ;-)

it helped me to read parts of his book at a time and then watch his lectures. I do not have a background in any of this so for me, it was a slow read

Sam Oakland - He should write a book.

Sean Carroll has given up serious physics long ago. He is now a bullshit salesman. He has a point... selling bullshit pays better and is far easer than physics. ;-)

Did you ever get anywhere with this?

Go listen to theoria apophasis on KZfaq. Right now. Emergency.

I know this was a year ago but isn’t that exactly what decoherence insinuates? You lose the entirety of the other states information as they aren’t what your state evolved to be. I guess you could argue that information was never real in the first place as the system didn’t take form but idk

@@cardinality1975 First attested 1902 (OED) in the electrical engineering sense "the resetting of a coherer." From decohere (also 1902) +‎ -ence, representing the verbal noun (compare decohesion, decoherency).

The way I understand it is that the way reality actually is, on a microscopic level, is not how we perceive it at the macroscopic level. We evolved to survive, and in order to do that, our brain has to perceive things in a way that maximizes our survival chances. The vocabulary we use to make sense of the world we live in (perceive) can be done with Newtonian physics. You don't need to talk about branches or decoherence or any of that vocabulary. I dont think hes saying that micro doesnt influence macro. It does but not how we think because we are 'macro'-beings

all patterns/rules aren't 1:1 linear. some patterns/rules are true at the micro level, but the proportion changes at the macro level. ( example - a small animal will be lose more heat than a big animal .. a mammal with a large surface to volume ratio (a small mammal) will lose heat more easily in a cold environment than a mammal with a small surface to volume ratio (a large mammal))

Super-Determinism. Check it out.

Your metaphor of two clocks is exactly the argument Einstein made to explain entanglement. Except he used the metaphor of two gloves. If you have a pair of gloves and place one glove in one box and the other glove in the another box then ship them light years in two directions, once you open one box and find a right-handed glove, then you know the box across the universe contains the left handed glove.

John Bells theorem showed that this isnt the case. Entanglement is real. Until you measure it, it would be in a super position(not determined).

The process of observation doesn't collapse the wave function. That's just nonsense that was made up by people a long time ago who didn't understand what was actually happening. An observation in quantum mechanics simply removes energy from the quantum system. Once that energy is removed, the system can only be in a lower energy state. What we call "the projection operator" for a measurement is simply the expression of the fact that we have reduced the system by means of energy conservation to a subset of the previously possible states. Please keep in mind that we don't know if the system was ever in a higher energy state. It may not have been, in which case "the observation" would have yielded a null-result. But if it didn't, then it had to remove a quantum of energy and hence the system is in the lower energy state in either case. It's not rocket science... but the usual "collapse" language completely obfuscates the actual physics of quantum measurements.

we are always entangled with the environment, cant escape that:)

The answer is there is no such decision. Both copies of you (including the one you are now) will feel consciousness continuity. The trick is both copies think they are “you”.

@@manuelbevand6366 Yeah but I'm not feeling both streams of consciousness at once, so there has to be some other me out there who might be feeling continuity of a different timeline but it is not me. I'm not feeling his reality. So, why am I not him and he is not me? What decided that and how?

@@goldibollocks My best guess is: nothing decided that. The wave function predicts two outcomes with two copies, each possibly wondering why they are "themselves" and not the other. Both copies necessarily exist, as predicted by the Schrodinger equation. One of them has to be "you".

Intuition tells me that's wrong. it makes no sense and nothing else like that exists on our scale. For me, I'm more likely to believe that we're missing something that would add a new dimensio or view like Plato's cave

The wave function is not a physical entity. It doesn't "branch". Sean Carroll is simply selling you a bunch of goods here that have nothing to do with science.

It's the quick wit and that twinkle in the eye

None. But a whole lot of bullshit gets created, for sure.

Consciousness is overrated. There was universe way before there was consciousness and there will be after

Consciousness is everything. Matter does not exist according to Max Planck. The Nature of Matter speech Florence, Italy 1944 - “As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.” The top equation after Einstein's is in "The Nature of Energy", the answer to existence. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form or be concentrated. [m=E/(c*c) where E=∞=God] This tells us: mass=Energy divided by the speed of light squared where Energy=Infinity=God. The debate is over. Matter is a wave that collapses into particle form once observed, not just by humans, but the molecules around it. All matter has form and function; all material forms have a soul and a consciousness, so erosion can take place even though a human is not looking at it.

@@folkblueswriter yup there is not matter per se, it looks like theres only fields and excitations in them, but it does not require conciousness in any way shape or form. The fields were there before there was consciousness and will be long after. Just because you can internalize your experiences and are here for it does not mean that you influence it or that it wouldnt exist.

@@VytenisR1 You are uttering nonsense: messiahsword.weebly.com I will get you on Judgment Day atheist. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o8xxicKS0aq6g6c.html

as far as i understand it, spooky action at a distance is not really spooky action at a distance per see. say you have 2 entangled particles, you don't know their spin and they have 50/50 chances to spin up or down. now you take one particle and move it far far away. we tell that the particles are in a superposition of having both spin up and down only because we haven't measured it yet. but i think that their spin was determined at the moment of their split, that is when the 2 worlds have split and both exist separately. so when you decide to measure the spin of your particle, you know what is the spin of the second particle and hence in what world you are, but you don't influence the spin of the particle, you just observe it. thus you are not influencing the second particle, you just know what is it's spin. a more quotidian example: say you have a randomizer that will write on 2 papers 1 or 0 with a 50/50 chance. it wrote the number and sealed the papers in envelopes, you take one and stay home, your friend takes the second and travels to the moon. one day you decide to open the envelope and read the number. now you know your number and the number of your friend. but you have not influenced the number of your friend. so no info was transmitted instantly. the paper with the number traveled to the moon at the speed of your friend's ship and the number was determined at the moment of printing, way before you read it.

@@pteronoid thats what Einstein illustrated with his glove analogy. Seal two gloves in a box without knowing, send them apart and look inside. If you get a right hand glove then the other one will be left hand. But John Bell proved that he was wrong and entanglement is really real. They are in a super position. It would be 1 and 0 at the same time until you measured it.

@@VytenisR1 well John Bell is not very convincing for me. I would argue that even if you don't know what it is (until you measure it), that does not mean that it is in a superposition, that means only that you don't know. what glove you got was "decided at random" at the moment when the box was sealed and handed to you. are the gloves entangled? in a sort, if you know one, you know the other one. but is it spooky action at a distance violating the speed of light? we wish, but it's not.

@@pteronoid i agree. But lucky for us, theres more people, done more variations of the experiment, that are more convincing. Its you right to believe that they are incorrect or they missed something or theres an error in all those experiments. Watch the quantum eraser experiment

@@VytenisR1 don't get me wrong, i don't want to believe in wrong things just because i don't like the right ones. i am a science guy. i just have many questions for these interpretations of QM, so far the many worlds interpretation responds to them well without creating paradoxes. also the quantum eraser experiment, do you know where i can find the actual experiment? all i find are some illustrations but no actual info about who performed the experiment, the actual data. it's as if it is only a thought experiment.

Yours is a branch. Mine is a tree. (Just kidding. Of course we are, and there it branched again, and again, and again, etc.)

How could we be anything/where else?

Rajesh S Watch double slit experiment. Then the delayed choice quantum eraser.

If you observe it then you measured it. If you know where it is then its a particle but until you do measure its a wave.

Both are mapped in 2 dimensions - purpose.to describe 3 dimensional properties of matter in motion . e.g. oscilloscope wave is a particle spin. "symbols fall short explanation "

eh it makes some things easier to explain to my teeny mind. but it one of those things that is difficult to test for isn't it? but we cant test any better for the singular universe nor can we explain why the values we see are so tuned to having stuff and eventually life when they so could not. did out singular universe just reset till it got something that worked? is there some processes to get there? is the strong and weak forces set my something, the force of gravity? if they are then they almost seem to have to be emergent from something. we do not have any working theory of gravity PERIOD. someone gets that they a step closer to some of these questions. but in a multiverse where things very much act like quantum systems, you get universes emerging and collapsing all the time, just random chance would net you some occasionally, eventually some of those would see a universe that would look like ours. that is why i think some of us like the multiverse vs the not multverse. both sides got work to do however. make your cases.

@@scottmiller4295 It kind of irks me when he says "No,animals cannot make many worlds..only humans"..and that is what he said. I'm sure most pet owners ..of many types of animals would wonder why not?...keep on going to bacteria that live an hour..how many quintillion to the quintillion plus worlds have they made? See,you have to buy into the anthropic principle to go with many worlds. As if we are apart from a Universe made just for us,or even just YOU. That's hard for me to believe.

@@StanTheObserver-lo8rx well here is my problem with it we are animals, so its ego centric to say it :P. we highly evolved primates part of nature and evolution despite our big brains able to ponder the big issues. but yea when i consider multi temporal dimensions i am very much thinking about the quanta of life not just humans, but here is one to bake the brain. if we emerge our realities by our own experiences and all other humans are emerging our own then we would be be in our own little temporal or universal bubble pretty early on and it would spit off more and more as you went on, now do it for for every animal bacteria and plant and leaf. but people far smarter in math than i assure me space has space for all that and more. i still struggle how space became a thing and when did it become and thing and why? not our space but all the space that all our space and any other spaces that came to be emerged from. life finds a way i guess.

You misunderstand the nature of the problem entirely.

@@Oners82 Glad to know you have it all figured out, will you publish soon?

@@robertw1871 I don't need to publish, what I am saying is already well established and has been for decades thanks to Bell (a more recent 2011 paper confirmed that QM is complete and no amount of change to the theory can give fuller decriptions/predictions). Essentially you are saying that restrictions on what we can know via QM are due to the mathematical formalism itself, and that a better formalism would fill in these gaps. However we know that such a hope is in fact in vain - the limitations on what we can know are due to the nature of quantum systems themselves and are completely independent of the formalism used to decsribe them. In other words it doesn't matter how we model quantum systems, there will never be a complete description as such a thing is impossible. See Roger Colbeck; Renato Renner (2011). "No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power"

Oners82 Excellent, we should then immediately defund all high energy physics experiments as there is nothing left to know. All I was trying to say is than in a few hundred years this concept might be proven wrong, just as Newton was as correct as could be someone came along and completely redid this entirely even though all physics experts at the time thought it unnecessary. I assume there is still fundamental principles we don’t yet have correct being that physics can’t even build a simple majority on exactly how to apply the mathematics we currently have. Obviously I’m not in the shut up and calculate camp. Has string theory or it’s derivatives been completely ruled out? There still yet be something more fundamental beneath QM as most believe there is.

@@robertw1871 Why the hell would we defund high energy physics??? It is hard to tell whether you are either incredibly stupid of just dishonest. I didn't say that there is nothing left to find out, I said that your understanding of the issue is completely flawed and has already been proven to be wrong. Nothing will change that fact regardless of what delusional hopes you may have. Learn how to read.

The election had a wavefunction? Lol.

to me even light

Actually, it's business. Sean Carroll has found out that nonsense sells better than facts.

Not exactly. Branching happens on the quantum level, the micro level. Trees standing/falling are the macro level. You might say the different states of the tree (standing, falling) emerge in the different wave branches but the branching happens because of tiny quantum events.

​@@aaron2709 But doesn't this video argue that the macro level observer is also in a quantum superposition state?

@@penderway I would not phrase it quite that way. Rather, everything we see in our macro world emerges from the quantum world. Living in an 'emergent' world looks rather different than the quantum world it sprang from but... it all follows 2 rules: everything can be described as a wave function and all wave functions obey the Schrodinger equation. There may very well be a separate universe for every variation of standing/falling trees but because of decoherence, these separate worlds can never interact in any way. We'll never see them. The only way we can even know they exist is because Schrodinger's mathematical equation predicts they will. If you believe Schrodinger's equation (which has never been wrong, never falsified), this is the result.... many worlds.

@TRIBAL BY NATURE Lol.

I too hate it when people mix Greek and Roman Gods!

Or get Adblock and listen again...

You need to stop being a childish troll.

youbube bot put them here? wow you really got nothing better than to bitch about someone buying ads on youtube? run adblocker normie no more ads problem sole4ve for you you never have to see the evil epoch times, or walmart and their slave labor force, and apple and their slave labor and toxic mining operations, and google and their orweallian social engineering you do not have to support and fuckbook and their bullshit ads. fuck off. install adblock.

@David Sims Absolutely!!! Get back to being scientists, for Pete's sake!

@Cenhancer A ton and a half more than you do.

we do not know either way for sure get back when someone has a unified theory of everything and let us know.

He certainly is. This is the first time I saw him in this mood in a video. Interesting, I wonder what happened for him to loose his usual nonchalance.

@@artfish1075 he always held this position, watch some of his old lectures. Just this time maybe he went a little deeper into the subject then the videos you watched

@@VytenisR1 Maybe he's holding a superposition...