NASA finally declared the real reason the Peregrine moon lander Failed!

  Рет қаралды 167,702

GREAT SPACEX

GREAT SPACEX

4 ай бұрын

NASA finally declared the real reason the Peregrine moon lander Failed!
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #spacexstarship #starship
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
===
NASA finally declared the real reason the Peregrine moon lander Failed!
While ULA and Blue Origin were celebrating the long-awaited success of their Vulcan flight, NASA encountered a setback. Their first robotic lander in over fifty years lost its trajectory to the moon after just a few hours of flight.
The Peregrine lander, commissioned by NASA, was slated to touch down near the lunar south pole on February 23. A successful landing would have marked the first American moon mission since Apollo 17's arrival in December 1972, and notably, the inaugural lunar landing by a private company.
Shortly after the spacecraft detached from the rocket's upper stage, controllers encountered a concerning issue. An anomaly with its thrusters hindered the spacecraft's ability to align itself with the sun, posing a potential threat to its capability to make a soft lunar landing.
The initial indication of trouble arose when the spacecraft couldn't adjust its position to allow its solar panels to face the sun. The ground-based engineering team managed to command the craft to maneuver into the correct orientation, enabling its batteries to recharge. These batteries are crucial for powering Peregrine's communications and scientific instruments, which, at present, appear to be functioning adequately.
After numerous attempts, that aspiration has now been officially shattered. Astrobotics and NASA have focused on a potential explanation for the issues affecting its Peregrine moon lander.
"Astrobotic's current hypothesis regarding the propulsion anomaly on the Peregrine spacecraft is that a valve between the helium pressurant and the oxidizer failed to reseal after activation during initialization," stated company representatives in a post on X Tuesday afternoon (Jan. 9).
"This resulted in a surge of high-pressure helium, causing a spike in the oxidizer tank's pressure beyond its operational limit and subsequent tank rupture," they further explained.
In simpler terms, imagine this: you have a spaceship, and inside it, there are things that help it move around. One of these things is like a door that controls the pressure inside. Astrobotic thinks that this door didn’t close properly when they turned it on, which caused too much air to go into another part of the ship, making it burst from not being able to withstand the extra air.
In space, a propellant system leak acts as a thruster (explains cartoon balloon physics), which in turn hindered the teams' ability to position the solar panels for charging the batteries.
The Peregrine lander relies on a hypergolic propellant mixture, blending hydrazine fuel with a nitric oxide and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer solution. This established design ignites spontaneously when these substances come into contact, eliminating the need for an external ignition source.
Astrobotic's spacecraft comprises two fuel and oxidizer tanks each, along with a fifth tank for helium pressurant. The craft features five main engines and 12 smaller attitude control engines.
Astrobotic engineers have devised a method to prevent the lander from spinning uncontrollably. However, with a continuously operating reaction control thruster and a leaking propellant, the spacecraft's fuel will eventually deplete, resulting in its loss.
While this explanation is preliminary, a comprehensive report will be prepared by an expert review board post-mission. All available data from the lander is being collected to support this analysis.
The ULA's Vulcan rocket placed Peregrine on the intended translunar trajectory without any apparent issues. There's currently no evidence suggesting that the propulsion anomaly occurred due to the launch.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the KZfaq Fair Use copyright guidelines: kzfaq.infoen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you.

Пікірлер: 809
@MarkAMMarrk
@MarkAMMarrk 4 ай бұрын
It all just confirms how AWESOME the NASA of the 60's was.
@nirajshrestha5621
@nirajshrestha5621 4 ай бұрын
Not on their own capacity but appointing, recruiting with Operation Paperclip.
@janardhan_john
@janardhan_john 4 ай бұрын
Hollywood studio
@tukaidas1272
@tukaidas1272 4 ай бұрын
Hollywood green screen and cgi 😂😂 cast actor neil armstrong 😂😂😂
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947 3 ай бұрын
Riiiight, because the NASA of today which is driving a giant rover around and flying a drone on Mars and launching a space telescope that is sending Earth the most beautiful images in human history is so boring and basic.
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947 3 ай бұрын
@@tukaidas1272 Ah yes when you're too stupid because you're a grade school dropout to understand cgi wasn't even a thing back then.
@MarkW_
@MarkW_ 4 ай бұрын
Well, it has a DHL logo. My experience with DHL is that packages either arrive broken or not at all. So, not surprised!
@MrSTITCH300
@MrSTITCH300 4 ай бұрын
That's very funny 😅😅😅
@InterstateTechno
@InterstateTechno 4 ай бұрын
We're all on mushrooms now because you are a FUN-GI
@richardcorwin1828
@richardcorwin1828 4 ай бұрын
You have to be concerned when an engineer says "Oops".
@colonbina1
@colonbina1 4 ай бұрын
A bad sign?
@TheNiteinjail
@TheNiteinjail 4 ай бұрын
Entire mission killed by a stuck valve ... Ouch.
@TheNiteinjail
@TheNiteinjail 4 ай бұрын
This is like writing off your Cybertruck because the window wiper failed. Lol
@ghoward6797
@ghoward6797 4 ай бұрын
I had that happen once to a toilet 🪠
@anthonyf22
@anthonyf22 4 ай бұрын
SpaceX, SpaceX, SpaceX, SpaceX use something that actually will work
@michaeldecker2725
@michaeldecker2725 4 ай бұрын
Makes it more amazing they did this successfully 50 years ago!
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
repeat after me.... i am a ai iphone zombie slave... of and by the ds... sadly this the case for your timeline
@vladimirarnost8020
@vladimirarnost8020 4 ай бұрын
Indeed. However the first flights (Apollo 4) did not land on the Moon. Not even the first manned translunar flight (Apollo 8). It was the subsequent flights (Apollo 11, 12, 14-17) which made the actual landings. It took _lots_ of work and gradual improvements to eventually get there. Even SpaceX took several years and many test flights to learn how to reliably land a rocket booster. The first attempts were closer to fireworks than rocketry. Rocket engineering is hard. Prototype spacecrafts developed by small independent companies are expected to suffer from glitches (teething problems). We'll see when/if Astrobotic builds a new spacecraft and gets it launched...
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
@@vladimirarnost8020 delusion is strong....
@tubecated_development
@tubecated_development 4 ай бұрын
@@michelleper5065 you can overcome it. Learn engineering.
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development you cant... engineering gets you no where ... you tried.. you will never ever be on a moon... and i guarantee you that!
@vermontsownboy6957
@vermontsownboy6957 4 ай бұрын
The synthesized digi-voice kills this channel.
@Doomsquad99
@Doomsquad99 4 ай бұрын
Lol I almost clicked off before he started speaking…. Edit: because your comment was shown
@colonbina1
@colonbina1 4 ай бұрын
We will try to improve this, thanks
@otpyrcralphpierre1742
@otpyrcralphpierre1742 4 ай бұрын
@@colonbina1 Why not just Narrate with a Real, Live, Human?
@PhilippensTube
@PhilippensTube 4 ай бұрын
Space is hard...success is never guaranteed. Every Apollo mission also encountered one problem or another. It was never trouble free. Fortunately, it weren't all big problems and most could be fixed or worked around.
@lichtgestalt9540
@lichtgestalt9540 4 ай бұрын
nasa is helpless without stanley kubrick! 😅
@christophsherburne6792
@christophsherburne6792 4 ай бұрын
DEI is a Wondrous Thing with these Companies! Isn’t It? Laughably Moronic Meritless Hires.
@mieczyslawherba2723
@mieczyslawherba2723 4 ай бұрын
The cost of the mission: 1 bln USD. The cost of the valve: 1000 USD. No comment.
@ebenwaterman5858
@ebenwaterman5858 4 ай бұрын
$1000? Probably less.
@viking515066
@viking515066 4 ай бұрын
Thats the problem when the director says we only expect 50% achievement, how about 100%, have redundant systems in place in case of failure. Why not separate tanks in sections so you dont run out of gas
@superllama666____________3
@superllama666____________3 4 ай бұрын
I always say it, and it only gets more true, nobody knows how to do anything properly anymore. We are getting stupider
@Kehvan
@Kehvan 4 ай бұрын
Oh... blaming a valve instead of blame ULA's rocket faring for damaging the fuel tank? They should have just used SpaceX.
@InterstateTechno
@InterstateTechno 4 ай бұрын
Precisely; I also think the faring setup had something to do with the failure
@iancole931
@iancole931 4 ай бұрын
Must have been heartbreaking for the people who put thousands of hours into this project.
@giannismentz3570
@giannismentz3570 4 ай бұрын
True, but it's best when these kind of problems come up early and with no people in there. And tbh their explanation should actually be heartbreaking for scooter mechanics, let alone space engineers - sounds like they forgot airplane tech.
@david-ky7rt
@david-ky7rt 4 ай бұрын
Nasa, gone backwards, 6 successful moon landings from 1969 - 1972, and now they can't even put a robot on the moon , it's embarrassing.
@highvibes3758
@highvibes3758 4 ай бұрын
@@david-ky7rt you are worse than nasa if you believe that we've ever been successful 👎
@martyreyes2000
@martyreyes2000 4 ай бұрын
It is mentioned about how recent failures from other countries led to subsequent success in future missions. Too bad we in the US didn’t have any prior missions to shorten our learning curve.
@MuzixMaker
@MuzixMaker 4 ай бұрын
Seems to me that if we’re serious about being a permanent presence on the moon we should implement infrastructure first, starting with a LPS and lunar-synchronous communications and mapping satellite system. LZs should be known down to the square foot.
@InterstateTechno
@InterstateTechno 4 ай бұрын
Normally I hate great spacex 'explanations' but they hit the nail right here. Good job.
@Lykapodium
@Lykapodium 4 ай бұрын
Anything with Bill Nelson attached to it will eventually fail
@M5guitar1
@M5guitar1 4 ай бұрын
Redundancy and proper activation procedures would have prevented this failure. What a shame. I've worked on multiple spacecraft, never having such a system failure. This smacks of inexperience that NASA should have corrected at PDR.
@brucegarwood2022
@brucegarwood2022 4 ай бұрын
Maybe NASA should talk to INDIA to see how to do it with a lot less money
@billkaldem5099
@billkaldem5099 4 ай бұрын
As an American I say ouch. As a realist I say that might not be a bad idea
@Time2gojoe
@Time2gojoe 4 ай бұрын
*Astrobotic. NASA doesn't build landers. This mission was part of their new(ish) charter to use and fund commercial companies for all space endeavors. Maybe India should figure out how to do a space program without tax payer money and you'd have 20 aerospace companies building space vehicles
@effigy42
@effigy42 4 ай бұрын
Wait this comment wasnt sarcastic over the fact that the indian moon landing presentation was unfathomably fake and bad ….???😂😂😂
@sk3143
@sk3143 4 ай бұрын
Why India's space program is cheap? Their worker income is so low, about $2000.
@tubecated_development
@tubecated_development 4 ай бұрын
@@effigy42How was the presentation ‘fake’?
@AA-wd2or
@AA-wd2or 4 ай бұрын
In 70s do it ... and now can't ..how?
@janardhan_john
@janardhan_john 4 ай бұрын
Hollywood studio
@LoyalHacket
@LoyalHacket 4 ай бұрын
Budget issue comparing 1970 NASA's budget
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947
@midnightgamingwithmysticni947 3 ай бұрын
You do know that the U.S. has been on Mars driving a rover and flying a drone for the past 2 years right stupid?
@robhawthorne6892
@robhawthorne6892 4 ай бұрын
I’m absolutely amazed, 50 years later, the advancement of technology and computer power and we can’t land on the moon again! Maybe it never happened to begin with.. 🤷‍♂️
@Allegheny500
@Allegheny500 4 ай бұрын
What did you expect from a generation who can't even find the US on an unmarked world map half the time?
@RabidWombatz
@RabidWombatz 4 ай бұрын
Air?! Air?!! Helium is not air!
@nicksantos43
@nicksantos43 4 ай бұрын
You would think we'd have propellant valves figured out by now...
@user-kk2km5nm8g
@user-kk2km5nm8g 4 ай бұрын
They Blowing SMOKE
@mannyricketson4517
@mannyricketson4517 4 ай бұрын
I keep saying SpaceX blows stuff up over and over but they make it work
@Nobilangelo
@Nobilangelo 4 ай бұрын
Little Green Men did not appreciate the interruption to their spaced-out lunch and fired their lasers at the cause.
@richardzapor4607
@richardzapor4607 4 ай бұрын
The Vulcan/BE4 are possible causes by out-of-spec vibration environment. The stuck valve was tested to a margin vibration environment thus an out-spec vibration is plausible. Design with a single point failure is marginal. Two parallel valves, four total, would provide redundancy.
@chrisantoniou4366
@chrisantoniou4366 4 ай бұрын
Two parallel valves wouldn't have prevented the problem. Two valves would of course reduce the single failure points for opening a valve, but two valves doubles the number of single failure points for closing a valve because if either valve failed to close, the pressure inside the oxidizer would still have gone through the roof and ruptured the tank. I agree that out of spec vibration from any of the booster rocket engines could have led to the failure, but if that was the case that information should come out fairly quickly.
@Mtltrm
@Mtltrm 4 ай бұрын
Apparently some people forgot about mechanical redundancies... Oops, it's only a few billion dollars right?!? 🤔😒😬🙄
@georgesealy4706
@georgesealy4706 4 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, the years keep slipping by.
@quackyduck1499
@quackyduck1499 4 ай бұрын
NASA can't even predict the weather.
@Jeremy9697
@Jeremy9697 4 ай бұрын
? What kinda of statement is this? Lmao
@flyingmoose
@flyingmoose 4 ай бұрын
You really have to use the analogy of a valve to a door? Who doesn’t know what a valve is?
@phillipkalaveras1725
@phillipkalaveras1725 4 ай бұрын
Biden should be thanking Elon Musk for refusing to go along with DEI hiring. Without SpaceX, we would not have much of a space program at all.
@Raptorman0909
@Raptorman0909 4 ай бұрын
Is that all you can come up with -- you are a troll!
@user-bl6ne3hc6n
@user-bl6ne3hc6n 4 ай бұрын
Yep, that's what I wrote, we're not hiring the best,
@detch01
@detch01 4 ай бұрын
Doing stuff in space is hard. Stuff happens. The one sure-fire way to make a small fortune in the space industry is to start with a large one.
@akira28shima32
@akira28shima32 4 ай бұрын
Shouldn’t these valves been tested hundreds of times here, not just one time on flight?
@thierryfiq
@thierryfiq 4 ай бұрын
So shameful after their initial successes of the 20th century... 🙄🙄🙄
@territurner71
@territurner71 4 ай бұрын
We should join India.
@sanjibreloaded6938
@sanjibreloaded6938 4 ай бұрын
NASA and ROSCOSMOS are pioneer in space technology. it is because of them we can now dream of going to space as tourist..and don't worry we failed to in 2019 but we worked hard, did a failure based assessment and we succeeded.you can do it too and i pray for you success on your next mission..love from india. ❤ And one thing try ditching the calculators please..it will make you sloppy.we ditched them when were were in 5th standard😂
@kellyeye7224
@kellyeye7224 4 ай бұрын
Percentage failure is worse for the moon than it is for Mars! Looks to me as if 'someone' doesn't want anyone to go there...????
@pichan8841
@pichan8841 4 ай бұрын
Well...'Someone' did not keep India's moon lander from completing the mission successfully....
@Jeremy9697
@Jeremy9697 4 ай бұрын
It is harder to land on the moon vs mars. Mars has an atmosphere to help slow down and even use parachutes. It's rocky on mars but not crater riddled like the moon.
@kellyeye7224
@kellyeye7224 4 ай бұрын
@@Jeremy9697 ISTR that the missions fail before they even get to the surface!
@virgiliustancu9293
@virgiliustancu9293 4 ай бұрын
Maybe is time for NASA to make the Moon Landing in a Studio.😂😂😂
@phillipkalaveras1725
@phillipkalaveras1725 4 ай бұрын
Boeing and now Astrobotic seem unable to make a valve that works. I'm sure if they ask nicely Elon will make as many valves as they need.
@montagray3761
@montagray3761 4 ай бұрын
Well...Boeing has a LOT of problems right now. They lost the engineeing vs salesmoron war during the merger and well...Seems their products are junk now.
@Raptorman0909
@Raptorman0909 4 ай бұрын
Elon is unlikely to make any of these valves, generally, items like this are purchased from companies that are specialist at making ... valves! You are a troll!
@montagray3761
@montagray3761 4 ай бұрын
Wow...that dude is super angry about valves! I guess he NEVER heard of anyone produing anything in house. Anyone think we hit a nerve with this whole debacle?
@davidroberts5602
@davidroberts5602 4 ай бұрын
Hi great 👍 space x thanks for amazing 😊video of the space industry David 🚀🇬🇧❤️👍
@kstaxman2
@kstaxman2 4 ай бұрын
Hydrazine is nasty stuff to work with. Valves are often a problem when using it ask Boeing. Anyway this isn't a problem they can't solve and it's good they could understand exactly what happened so they know what to fix.
@biffjones2601
@biffjones2601 4 ай бұрын
Why not just build another "highly successful" lunar lander from the Apollo missions? Or did they lose the manuals on how to build them?
@effigy42
@effigy42 4 ай бұрын
@@mojojojo1529you walked right into that one 😂
@mouselord999
@mouselord999 4 ай бұрын
It ain't got no gas in it
@enderw88
@enderw88 4 ай бұрын
"Sling Blade" reference, nice.
@MuzixMaker
@MuzixMaker 4 ай бұрын
Well played.
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 4 ай бұрын
The most critical component has no built-in redundancy.
@aerointeriordesignerjmurph7016
@aerointeriordesignerjmurph7016 4 ай бұрын
Great coverage of current space related activities.
@colonbina1
@colonbina1 4 ай бұрын
My honor, thanks for
@Second_Opinion_2
@Second_Opinion_2 4 ай бұрын
NASA you so silly, sometimes you act like you never been to the moon!
@joeshmoe4671
@joeshmoe4671 4 ай бұрын
Currently, there is no employee of NASA who had anything to do with any of the moon landings. Anybody who was involved with that program is retired or passed away. NASA is currently living off its legacy, and SpaceX is the only hope for NASA to get to the moon in the next couple of years. Artemis is nothing more than a jobs program for the Military Industrial Complex.
@tukaidas1272
@tukaidas1272 4 ай бұрын
They never been 😂😂😂
@andyf104
@andyf104 4 ай бұрын
3:46 is there a longer version of this footage available somewhere..?
@user-fu8vn7xo6c
@user-fu8vn7xo6c 4 ай бұрын
Too many NASA DEI hires? Boeing made it a high priority for at least 2 years.
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
who won ww2 eh? lol...
@truemandenny3786
@truemandenny3786 4 ай бұрын
No excuses for stuck valve on well known hyperbolic thruster systems. High G’s are expected and they just blew it, period! The only real challenge was after successfully entering lunar orbit, being able to successfully descend to the lunar surface. Not doing the former makes their lunar landing capabilities sketch.
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
lol
@randyharmon280
@randyharmon280 4 ай бұрын
Don't Insult our Intelligence...
@darkguardian1314
@darkguardian1314 4 ай бұрын
Didn't like the exposed fuel tanks. They should have been covered. They likely ruptured after second stage separation. Best option is Earth-Moon orbit for eternity. With human remains aboard that's not such a bad consolation prize.🎉
@fordprefect.betelguese
@fordprefect.betelguese 4 ай бұрын
So the can of redbull and the cremated human remains will spend eternity drifting through space...
@craigsavarese8631
@craigsavarese8631 4 ай бұрын
So, a private company’s module caused this failure. Nice. I hope they are financially held accountable to the taxpayer’s lost investment on this mission.
@PlanXV
@PlanXV 4 ай бұрын
Yes 😊 the money 💰 also missing
@Allegheny500
@Allegheny500 4 ай бұрын
I smell an opportunity here and I'm not rich enough to take it so I'll post it. How about putting GPS satellites in orbit around the Moon so lander's and rovers can navigate and communicate back to earth even on the dark side? Same could be done for Mars as well.
@giannismentz3570
@giannismentz3570 4 ай бұрын
Shouldn't there be some kind of system that can isolate leaks from valves and such? You see a leak through some subsystem, you disable fuel flow through it, there should be multiple subsystems isolation switches, electrical, fuel, oxygen, etc. This is common in airplanes. If they didn't do this kind of thing, it's not really safe to put people in there. Do they have such systems? Then why didn't they work? Telemetry problems? There should be backups on pretty much everything possible. Shutdown/isolation switches? Put 2 or more in there. Telemetry sensors? At least 2 for each thing you're measuring. Broadcast telemetry? That system broke? Ok, direct that data through something else that still works and can broadcast, I don't know, the whole thing just sounds unbelievable to me. What you would expect in this, would be for them to see the leak through telemetry, isolate the related subsystem which in turn would disable from one to a couple or more of all those retro thrusters, the spacecraft should still be able to manoeuver in facing the sun, maybe at a (much?) slower rate? Although, why would the spacecraft wanna manoeuver in facing the sun? By doing so, you go off course as well, you gonna need many more course corrections. Wouldn't it be simpler if the solar panels themselves could be either manually or automatically turn to face the sun? The whole spacecraft?! Then, they could assess whether a reduced capabilities safe moon landing is possible or not through either an onboard system or with the help of mission control computers, and even if not, the spacecraft could go on to a moon orbit and back. Losing it completely by a fuel leak? Losing the spacecraft cause it was hit by some meteor and caused unforeseen damage in a fuel tank... and several other system failures, as well as throwing it off course, all at once, maybe. Even then, there could (and should) be ways, but maybe. Not being able to control a valve leak at all? That's airplane tech. I mean ok, they might have lost Saturn V tech, they lost airplane tech too? And people are gonna go in there?
@ahmetmutlu348
@ahmetmutlu348 4 ай бұрын
it seems main problem there with self oxydyzer rockets is the fuel and oxidant are reaching too hugh temperatures and if temperature isnt monitored and controlled precisely by fast sensor and controm module i guess it burn nozzles ... another problem i see thre is the model on video doesnt have positionning thrusters on top. ie like its on cruise missiles or space is positionning thruster mini rockets on top. which will help holding upper head in where it had to be.
@alanhall2795
@alanhall2795 4 ай бұрын
only shows what's happened to the real heroes who put a man on the moon with genius and slide rules. Everything we do today is so "advanced" but sooooooo unreliable.
@user-bl6ne3hc6n
@user-bl6ne3hc6n 4 ай бұрын
Really great heroes back then, especially bringing back Apollo 13.
@sanjibreloaded6938
@sanjibreloaded6938 4 ай бұрын
Yeah you are right in your first sentence..but the second sentence you said...umm..ahh..nahh man you are right again..
@janardhan_john
@janardhan_john 4 ай бұрын
Just focus on Hollywood studio
@SaneGuyFr
@SaneGuyFr 4 ай бұрын
Brainless comment
@johnchristopherrobert1839
@johnchristopherrobert1839 4 ай бұрын
The real truth is that domestic flights are not allowed on the lunar South Pole. Why?, there is a clandestine base at the South Pole. 😜
@eduardjacob8710
@eduardjacob8710 4 ай бұрын
RÚSSIA enviou sonda à superfície lunar em 1966 !!!!! Slava Rússia !
@kennyfordham6208
@kennyfordham6208 4 ай бұрын
It's those dang space aliens! 🤨
@ohyeahwhat5387
@ohyeahwhat5387 4 ай бұрын
Actually it was the illudium Q36 explosive space modulator that caused the problem.
@tullyspry4289
@tullyspry4289 4 ай бұрын
Gas, NOT air....
@ebenwaterman5858
@ebenwaterman5858 4 ай бұрын
Where'd they get that valve? Amazon?
@eddiegochenour410
@eddiegochenour410 4 ай бұрын
Temu
@ernestgalvan9037
@ernestgalvan9037 4 ай бұрын
Nah, just the engines came from Amazon.
@NullHand
@NullHand 4 ай бұрын
​@@ernestgalvan9037You win the AWS Cloud for today...
@jackbn9353
@jackbn9353 4 ай бұрын
Pity the narrator never heard of Space-X.
@INSIGHTDESIGN
@INSIGHTDESIGN 4 ай бұрын
SO WHAT THE F HAPPEND TO THE LANDER?
@haroldishoy2113
@haroldishoy2113 4 ай бұрын
“Ground Control to Major Tom”, “Ground Control to Major Tom”
@chemistryclass878
@chemistryclass878 4 ай бұрын
USA's 70 moon landing is as true as their various indexes like democracy happiness freedom of speech 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@palladen1933
@palladen1933 4 ай бұрын
That failure was ridiculous, can't believe they only rely on one system for orientation, scientists from the 60s are making these people not look too good 😅
@ByronScottJones
@ByronScottJones 4 ай бұрын
That's not what happened. The failure had nothing to do with vehicle orientation.
@marknarveson4853
@marknarveson4853 4 ай бұрын
Kind of like the heater in my car.
@michaelbyrnee9584
@michaelbyrnee9584 4 ай бұрын
The real reason for the failure is that the lander was contaminated by proximity to BO.
@william2chao
@william2chao 4 ай бұрын
what? 50/50 success rate? Mostly achieved by China? No way.
@andrewbogle3350
@andrewbogle3350 4 ай бұрын
What a colossal waste of money. What is the purpose of going back to the moon? A base for the mission to go to Mars, an even more futile and pointless mission?
@user-fo7cx7ht5r
@user-fo7cx7ht5r 4 ай бұрын
You incorrectly stated that they had an "anomaly with the thrusters" at about 47 seconds in your video. You later correctly identify the statement from Astrobotic that it was the pressurization system issue. t Please understand that that earlier statement was in error, as they originally stated "propulsion system" and the valve in question is part of the pressurization subsystem. - Thruster Designer. :)
@DanFlashes99
@DanFlashes99 4 ай бұрын
NASA has been successful way more than not. Remember the amazing Perseverance landing a few years ago, and the Osiris asteroid lander -- they'll get it, this is just a hiccup.
@michelleper5065
@michelleper5065 4 ай бұрын
the got it.... you are ai iphone zombie... they sure got it lol......
@myfavoritemartian1
@myfavoritemartian1 4 ай бұрын
ULA is a NEWB in the space game. That valve should have been tested exhaustively under simulated conditions. Unfortunately no one can afford to fund multi-billion dollar experiments. A Big Hit for Amazon.
@philofthefuture1570
@philofthefuture1570 4 ай бұрын
ULA has been launching for decades, and they didn't build the lander nor were they responsible for its flight. Separate company, bud.
@frederick1411
@frederick1411 4 ай бұрын
the lander was built by Astrobotics
@myfavoritemartian1
@myfavoritemartian1 4 ай бұрын
@@philofthefuture1570 Aw Mom, you always spoil all my fun!
@philofthefuture1570
@philofthefuture1570 4 ай бұрын
@myfavoritemartian1 I know honey, but as your mom, it's my job to make sure you know things. Goodnight now. You go and dream of lunar missions that don't fuck up.😘🤣
@anthonymathews3872
@anthonymathews3872 4 ай бұрын
Are they trying to tell us that they do not have a secondary backup for all important moving parts.
@georgesealy4706
@georgesealy4706 4 ай бұрын
NASA didn't even have a backup space shuttle ready to rescue astronauts should the space shuttle become disabled in space until the Columbia disaster happened. And NASA did suspect that Columbia suffered some degree of damage on liftoff.
@donaldgrant9067
@donaldgrant9067 4 ай бұрын
Those look like ceiling lamps.
@MakaiMauka
@MakaiMauka 4 ай бұрын
Vibration from BE-4’s
@arthurfarrow
@arthurfarrow 4 ай бұрын
This sounds like the problems with Surveyor 5
@DonaldDucksRevenge
@DonaldDucksRevenge 4 ай бұрын
This is so unfortunate. I hope the probe survives so Gene's ashes can be given a proper send-off or landed on the Moon at a later date
@effigy42
@effigy42 4 ай бұрын
Maybe they should just cgi it and present that… oh wait
@mannyricketson4517
@mannyricketson4517 4 ай бұрын
Some one in nasa doesn't want to take time to test and test to get it right
@Dug6666666
@Dug6666666 4 ай бұрын
Asrobotic's made it not Nasa.
@Hyposonic
@Hyposonic 4 ай бұрын
@@Dug6666666 Some one in "Astrobotics" doesn't want to take time to test and test to get it right
@Dug6666666
@Dug6666666 4 ай бұрын
@@Hyposonic Space X would just call that a test and make another one. Suck it and see, like their launch pad. Look at the bright side, the moon lander would have largely covered the launch cost for ULA to test their new rocket and that was successful.
@mannyricketson4517
@mannyricketson4517 4 ай бұрын
Fly SpaceX
@pronoob1036
@pronoob1036 4 ай бұрын
It’s a set back for the whole world. Who knows what it would have discovered if this mission were a success.
@irishguy200007
@irishguy200007 4 ай бұрын
Those Clingons
@user-cw2py6wh8l
@user-cw2py6wh8l 4 ай бұрын
SpaceX celebrates the Peregrine moon lander Failed.
@saturnfive2073
@saturnfive2073 4 ай бұрын
This is not a NASA spacecraft
@larryyoderlarryyoder353
@larryyoderlarryyoder353 4 ай бұрын
Can you say "incompetence" boys and girls ?
@joe92
@joe92 4 ай бұрын
This wasn't NASA's mission, dodo.
@Paul-hw8bk
@Paul-hw8bk 4 ай бұрын
Cheap means cost cutting.
@websonic1000
@websonic1000 4 ай бұрын
No GPS on Moon?!?!? Shiiiit!!! Who could predict that'???
@perryrush6563
@perryrush6563 4 ай бұрын
They forgot to change the "roam" feature to "LPS" ha ha. Lunar posit......never mind.
@dt-wq7ql
@dt-wq7ql 4 ай бұрын
As an Indian/Russian/Chinese AI BOT, i strongly object to other BOTS on this comment section accusing me/us of laughing at NASAs expensive & costly Failure. I/we would remind these other bots that its very difficult to find competent space craft makers .
@sanjibreloaded6938
@sanjibreloaded6938 4 ай бұрын
😂
@thenakedtruth0205
@thenakedtruth0205 4 ай бұрын
CONSIDERING THE FUELS AT LEAST THERE WAS A CHANCE FOR A GOOD LAUGH BY THE SPACECRAFT MODULE.
@krievolic
@krievolic 4 ай бұрын
an alien ship probably did that maybe take the hint
@dougtaylor7724
@dougtaylor7724 4 ай бұрын
The best they can do is “It just blowed up” Nice
@PlanXV
@PlanXV 4 ай бұрын
Long mask just did somethi g insane 😅
@mrbaab5932
@mrbaab5932 4 ай бұрын
Maybe using an unexperienced commercial space company by Nasa is the real problem. Nasa should have done a test flight with only dummy payload to see if Astrophonics can even reach the moon.
@mrbaab5932
@mrbaab5932 4 ай бұрын
NASA mission is longer than 14 days and India cannot do that yet because they are too cheap to pay for nuclear batteries for the lander and rover.
@PDLM1221
@PDLM1221 4 ай бұрын
Hey NASA didn’t build this it was a private company right!? But NASA could have suggested that they need to use Two valves on everything that’s a Major component, what a waste and embarrassment.
@Jeremy9697
@Jeremy9697 4 ай бұрын
Two valves means double the chance of failure dude lol
@JohnHSully
@JohnHSully 4 ай бұрын
I wouldn’t doubt it if it is still operational and they are keeping this one to themselves. NASA should stand for Not Actually Sharing Anything.
ONE MORE SUBSCRIBER FOR 6 MILLION!
00:38
Horror Skunx
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Super sport🤯
00:15
Lexa_Merin
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
1❤️
00:20
すしらーめん《りく》
Рет қаралды 33 МЛН
When a Su-30 Shot Down a F-35........................almost
7:31
Millennium 7 * HistoryTech
Рет қаралды 3,2 М.
JPL and the Space Age: Landing on Mars
59:48
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Рет қаралды 754 М.
Elon Musk delivers SpaceX update, talks Starship progress and more!
58:53
3.5.A Solar Mobile 📱 Charger
0:39
Gaming zone
Рет қаралды 320 М.
Samsung or iPhone
0:19
rishton vines😇
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Latest Nokia Mobile Phone
0:42
Tech Official
Рет қаралды 491 М.
👎Главный МИНУС планшета Apple🍏
0:29
Demin's Lounge
Рет қаралды 496 М.
Pratik Cat6 kablo soyma
0:15
Elektrik-Elektronik
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Индуктивность и дроссель.
1:00
Hi Dev! – Электроника
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН