Where are you getting 12 from? With Canadas reputation it'll be half that number

NO

Máximo 6 unidades 😎

Long overdue. Those old subs have been a bit of a disaster. Can probably get a new sub from Korea before Irving can produce one new frigate

@@BuddyMcNugget Los UPHOLDER no fueron un diseño satisfactorio y por eso la Royal Navy los ofreció a la venta ... apenas habian salido del astillero constructor . La Armada de Chile no se interesó por ellos ... a pesar de que la oferta Inglesa era atractiva , la ACH consideró que comprar 4 submarinos " casi nuevos" requeria una dotación DOBLE de tripulantes de lo que realmente tenia en ese año 1994 cuándo inició los estudios para reemplazar sus Subs. clase OBERON de mediados de la década de los 70s. ( al final de 1997 se escogió un modelo novisimo de diseño Franco- Español : Scorpene 2000 MC )

True.. But china take the top spot.. Except for cruise ship, the Germany has that spot

​@@faithosadebe5293China is fake

Sutton says it will have 10, he knows.

That's why there's even talk of Nuclear power sub for Canada, but that would be well after 2040 so in meanwhile Canada urgently need 3000t sized submarine Coz Russian sub even Chinese sub can penetrate Canada's water.

Germany and Norway have offered the 212CD to Canada as part of an Arctic security agreement. It'll be a couple years of assessing the two platforms and getting the funding comitted. But it will most likely be one of those two designs

@@patton3rd1my guess is Canada will make the announcement at a news conference in Washington DC next month at the NATO meeting. That is how urgent this matter is and the details will be (yet to be confirmed as they iron them all out).

South Korea has AIP systems that can have the subs submerged in water for over 2 to 3 weeks straight. Plus they have vertical launching ballistic missle tube's to fire cruise missles and even small ballistics missles. This is a huge offensive advantage.

Like they did to Indonesian subs

What are you talking about? The Indonesian sub (KRI Nanggala) that sank in 2021 is a German-made sub. It was a 40 year old sub and the Indonesian navy even didn't overhaul it for 9 years. It has nothing to do with DSME. On the other hand, the Indonesian navy set a new record of diving (250meters deep) and celebrated it due to its Jangbogo class sub. Indonesia is notorious for its bad MRO and putting the blame on the seller.

@@rims_86 that sunken sub was made in Germany. indonesia has to just pay for the KF-21 delayed payment and please stop spying on koren tech.

​@@jclulu3942bullshit..No need to look for defense, we have experienced the performance of the three Cangbogo submarines from Korea, really bad, noisy and unreliable in the Natuna Sea.

​​@@jclulu3942 as far as we normal Indonesian citizen knows (which should not be known by mere citizen) those subs are bad. So bad that they're mostly not going out of patrol.

S.Korea is also developing SME reactors for marine use. Also, Japan cannot produce such submarine as they have been promising so far. Even your soyu and tagai came out short as normal sized Canadian crew cannot fit into Tagai sub. Everything in Japanese sub is all manual driven, no automation so still needs more crews to operate.

@@ytn00b3 Well, go for it! That conceit will come back to haunt you in the form of an accident involving your own submarine that is not functioning properly. When will they be able to build a submarine that will not cause trouble and be criticized by the world like the Indonesian submarine accident? ? ? *The "Nangara" submarine was manufactured in West Germany. It was manufactured in 1978 as one of the Type 209 submarine series and incorporated into the Indonesian Navy in 1981. After that, from 2010, it was improved over a period of two years at Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (now Hanwha Ocean Co., Ltd.). The Korean company that modernized Indonesia's submarines is Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering. This company made its own improvements to the Type 209 submarine (Nagapasha-class submarine) introduced by Indonesia. Specifically, instead of the original from the developer, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering created a derivative of the Type 209/1400 type with its own improvements. A contract was signed in 2019 to introduce three additional improved submarines. However, payments have not progressed and it is unclear whether the contract will be implemented. Against this background, it has been reported that Indonesia is considering inviting experts from Europe to verify the technical reliability and actual capabilities of the Nagaparsha-class submarines. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering is a major Korean shipbuilding company that builds and refurbishes not only submarines but also various types of ships. In this way, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering can be said to be a company with the technical capabilities to modernize and refurbish submarines. However, the performance and reliability of the submarines will need to be evaluated and verified by experts. Attention is focused on future developments in this regard. まあ、がんばれや！そのうぬぼれが、稼働がままならない自国潜水艦の事故となって帰ってくる。インドネシアの潜水艦事故のように世界から非難される、迷惑をかけない潜水艦はいつ出来上がるのかな？？？ ＊「ナンガラ」潜水艦は西ドイツで製造されました。1978年に209型潜水艦シリーズの一隻として製造され、1981年にインドネシア海軍に編入されました。その後、2010年から2年間をかけて韓国【大宇造船海洋現：「ハンファオーシャン (株) (Hanwha Ocean Co., Ltd.)」】で改良工事が施されました。 インドネシアの潜水艦の近代化改修を行った韓国企業は大宇造船海洋です。この企業は、インドネシアが導入した209型潜水艦（ナーガパーシャ級潜水艦）に独自の改良を加えました。具体的には、開発元のオリジナルではなく、大宇造船海洋が独自の改良を加えた209/1400タイプの派生型を作り上げました。この改良型の潜水艦は、2019年に3隻の追加導入契約が締結されました。ただし、支払いが進んでおらず、契約が実行されるかどうかは不透明です。このような背景から、インドネシアはナーガパーシャ級潜水艦の技術的信頼性と実際の能力を検証するため、欧州から専門家を招くことを検討しているとの報道があります。なお、大宇造船海洋は、韓国の大手造船会社で、潜水艦だけでなく、さまざまな種類の船舶の建造や改修を手がけています。このように、大宇造船海洋は、潜水艦の近代化改修に関する技術力を持つ企業と言えるでしょう。ただし、潜水艦の性能や信頼性については、専門家による評価や検証が必要となります。この点については、今後の動向に注目が集まっています

@@n1k2-ja46 Anyway, let see if Canada are really buy KSS-III submarine, then wait until 1-2 years about they performance from Naval news for the submarine from South Korea. Hopefully Canada would not have same problem with Indonesia submarine, who had bad After Sales Service and getting the blame from the seller.

​@@ReLogic888 I have never received an answer on this matter that is based on clear facts, so I would like to hear a satisfactory answer from the people of the countries involved. この件について明確な事実に元づく回答を一度ももらったことがないので、当事国の国民の皆様から納得のいく回答がお聞きしたい次第です。

@@n1k2-ja46 You would never heard a clear and official statement from Indonesian Government about it. But based on signed contract between PT.PAL & Naval Group for scorpene Evolve type submarine, and Italian private sector company's with Indonesia lokal submarine company for building a midget submarine, you should be able to get a conclusion that Indonesia are not happy with Changbogo class.

적어도 수상 중에 민간 선박하고 충돌 후 휴대전화로 구조 요청 할 일은 없을 테니까요."2021년 2월 8일,일본의 해상자위대 소속 잠수함 "소류"호가 수상 중 홍콩 소속 민간 선박과의 충돌에서 통신 중계기 안테나가 부셔지면서~.." ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋwwwwww 少なくとも水上中に民間船舶と衝突後、携帯電話で救助要請することはないでしょうから。「2021年2月8日、日本の海上自衛隊所属の潜水艦『掃流』が水上で香港所属の民間船舶との衝突で通信中継機のアンテナが壊され…」 笑いますwwww

At least you won't have to call for rescue on your mobile phone after a collision with a civilian ship during the water." On February 8, 2021, the Japanese submarine "Soryu" from the Maritime Self-Defense Force broke its communications repeater antenna during a collision with a civilian ship belonging to Hong Kong..." LOL. WOWWWWAG

At least you won't have to call for rescue on your mobile phone after a collision with a civilian ship during the water." On February 8, 2021, the Japanese submarine "Soryu" from the Maritime Self-Defense Force broke its communications repeater antenna during a collision with a civilian ship belonging to Hong Kong..." LOL. wwwwwww 少なくとも水上中に民間船舶と衝突後、携帯電話で救助要請することはないでしょうから。「2021年2月8日、日本の海上自衛隊所属の潜水艦『掃流』が水上で香港所属の民間船舶との衝突で通信中継機のアンテナが壊され…」 笑いますwwww