IT didn't design.....absolutely everything had to happen and interact randomly as it did in the same exact ways it did for us and the other life on Earth to even be here....if it went any other way or deviated at all we would not exist as we do today the same and we would be asking different questions then these.....it's all random pieces that fell into place the way they did.....and evolution isn't absolutely the way life came to be either, it's what we have learned so far and the most plausable explanation until we come across more proof to support it or proof to support other scientific means as alternatives.....so science will constantly change and challenge it's beliefs and follow evidence. Religion is the opposite, never changing and dosen't question and analize itself because it dosen't want to prove itself wrong.....Science does want to prove itself wrong. One produces nieve uneducated people who want to be told what to believe...and the other are intelligent people willing to question their own beliefs in Science and how they think something might work......so many see that as a sign of deception when the info changes all the time and they can't keep up....they are called Religious

It’s like looking into a Funhouse mirror.

@@jnielsen90 i don’t think armando meant “designer” in the literal sense, or in the manner that religious proponents of creationism/intelligent design myths use the word “designer”. In this context, “designer” is used as a rhetorical device or metaphor to describe a long, natural process such as evolution. At least that’s the impression I got, but probably only because I write a lot and use the same methods to describe an intangible, abstract concept, idea, or philosophy, etc. 🤔

It has become the crown jewel of my extensive collection.

This is why you are an online dater……

@@shonz88 I’d date him just for the referral.

I don't agree with atheists anymore. They are simply ambrhamanics without a God. They carry the same mindset of US vs Them. They carry that same air of self righteousness and superiority over others. They have their sins and rules. They will crucify their apostates. Tell me how any of the atheist is different from any religious person. Dawkins for example. He is a missionary by all means. A missionary of 'No God'. I still Remeber how atheists started advertising themselves, carrying out billboard signs, seminars etc. And how they would and they do attack anybody who questions them... I mean their religion. The problem isn't with religion. The problem lies with abrahamanical beliefs. You don't become an atheist just by renouncing God. You become one by not giving a fuck about any theology. You do it by not caring about somebody's beliefs. The problem is not God. The problem is abrahmanism. One God, one book, set or rules, binary world view. And sadly atheism is not above it. You are as religiously indoctrinated as anybody else. Infact it's atheism which brought science and religion at face with each other. We landed on moon, and religion did not have any problem with Sceince. People kept on doing what they needed to do. You needed more of that. More people not caring about what you belive, not huddling themselves together in groups based on beliefs. Atheists may not belive in a God. But they are no less religiously indoctrinated than a devout christian. De-Abrahamanise your mind. I am An atheist who still attends all religious function in his Home, because my parents wish me to be there. I don't have to believe in God. Or anybody else. It doesn't matter if I bow or I don't bow. I don't make it a issue. I don't fight my parents to convert them into my own religion. BTW... Atheism is not a modern concept. It's a concept well embedded in Dharmic religions (experiential religions, as oppose to Intellectual religions of Abraham).... Of the East. It includes Hinduism, Shintoism, Taoism etc. I have a Hindu family. I have never prayed a minute in my life. And I dint have to come out of my closet like it was some big deal. Most of eastern scoeities never cared what you believed in, and that's why you see so many Gods (some community having a unique God per family)... And they did not fight. They didn't argue over who was better than whom. Whose was a true God and whose was false. They are experiential religion. That means God has to be experienced and seeked. And that means as many humans that many different experience. That's why you cannot convert to Hinduism. The Hare Krishnas that people see in the west are considered a fringe group in India. Because that organisation is mostly run by westerners and they again have introduced that idea of 'one true God'. Infact in mainstream hinduism Krishna is considered the avatar of the divine not even the divine in Hinduism. And there have been many like him. Buddha is also considered to be an avatar. And Hindus consider him a Hindu Saint There is hardly any religious fighting before abrahamanical religions landed in the east. I cringe when atheists start talking shit about God and Christians. I am like why the hell you have to do it? It reminds of catholic missionaries in India, who have this insatiable itch to convert everybody. Attack them if they attack you. Else live you life and screw your God, my God his God or her God... Why does it matter even.

@@shonz88 😂😂😂😂😂😂

I'd love to see more calming, smart personalities on TV. I'm sick and tired living in a different reality than half the country 😪

Neil deGrasse Tyson and Malcolm Nance are way up there in my opinion. Love to listen to them.

@@sewararabo I hear you. Every time an ad for the latest iteration of "Jersey Shore" comes on I can't turn it off fast enough

@@bradwest4821 when did he ever get Political in Cosmos? And how is he not “top tier”? What did he get wrong?

@@bradwest4821 well he has a podcast call Star Talk that explains science and how things work. It’s good he’s on TV. There is so much idiocy on the news these days it’s good to have a critical thinker and a scientist like Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson. It’s also great when others like Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking are trying to educate the public about science. There is nothing wrong with that.

Search KZfaq you'll find the full episode up around the same time these snippets are released....just set the search date for today only

@@solidussnake0079 Those full episodes are unwatchable, they're all zoomed in wierd, chopped up, mixed up or only the 1st half of the show played twice. Usually uploaded from wonderful places such as China/Belarus/Kazakhstan. I'm not giving those parasites views.

They upload the full episode to Apple Podcasts within a few hours. You just miss out on the graphics during certain segments.

@@judgegixxer Well, it costs to make those shows. So if you have the cash: why not subscribe to HBO? (the online variety - it's cheaper). If not: give it time: it'll get here :)

I think Neil asked the producers to explicitly not upload that part, how he behaved was embarrassing (I don’t belittle the UAP topic but his “rational” response).

George.........i think hes just great.

Neil is a tosser

I like how he replaced bill nye as the go to misinformer in the California Confederacy

He's also become a blowhard that loves his own voice... and he's become close minded as well... its shameful. This is what fame does.

Well yeah...that's why he's considered a good science 'communicator'...he's likable and relatable. He's also a media darling, but you know exactly why 'they' fawn over him. But...he's not considered an exceptional astrophysicist by his peers. His name is never mentioned when other scientists are asked as to who the most important and influential scientists are in the 21st century.

neil degrasse tyson is a sigma main confirmed

Socrates once said something aling the lines of a wise man knows that he knows nothing

Colleges HATE him! This one easy trick will dramatically increase your IQ!

I'm so sorry, it sounds like a nightmare.

He's become a mouth-piece...just like how fauci used to be a doctor.

How are you doing Dirk?

@@JenniferSmith-ho3im I'm doing well! How are you?

@@DirkHooper I would like to know you more do t you mind sending me your email or number so we can chat better off here

The writers shape the material to target the target audience's mentality. Newspapers are known to write at the level of a 6th grader.

Nice painting of a caricature you have there. As if science is unbiased. Must be a genius

Compared with this uneducated clown "BARDOCK" everyone is considered a "genius"! 😁😄😂🤣👏👏👏👍

A singularity

@@markburch6253 and wasn’t it a naked singularity?

Someone needs to bang....

I thought the bang was a surprise one :o

Before that was Young Sheldon

Bill nye always loves to be on Neils show. Keep up kid.

@@theSatanicNaturalists. it’s an ongoing joke from the Rogan podcast, keep up!

@@theweetbixkid7702 I'm not 12 I don't "keep up" with jokes kid. Please don't use my 'keep up' line. & definitely don't put an exclamation point at the end of it, that's suspect.

@@theSatanicNaturalists. maybe look it up and keep up with the joke first before you become a Karen

@@theweetbixkid7702 although I'm not 12, nor am I white, or a female. You need help kid.. Not understanding another humanbeing. Being mean to them, then blaming it on a joke. You basically said NDT talks too much. Then said blah blah blah it's a joke. I read in between the lines. I don't know the joke, but I'm smart enought to know exactly what it means. He's a Educator, Scientist, Talk show host. What do you mean he talks too much? According to your "joke" NDT should be shy & anti-social.

To exist, means to BE in a particular Time and Space. Ergo- no existence outside of time and space, because Time and Space are prerequisites for existents

can't prove a negative on that scale. "nothingness" _could_ exist. The issue is that we just haven't observed it. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

@@VoodooV1 "Nothingness" was invented as a placeholder for the absence of something in particular. It's not a thing to be observed. A room with nothing in it just means it is void of furniture. It's Nothingness isn't a thing

@Jeims Numin yes that's what us humans invented the word to describe

@Jeims Numin I have a dictionary that begs to differ. Better yet, try to describe an existent that is not confined to time and space. We exist today in this time and space. Dinosaurs existed at a particular time, and space (planet earth). The planet Pluto exists in a particular time and occupies a certain space. Nature, commanded must be obeyed. It's as simple as that.

Over a preacher... lol. Doesn't really sound like a compliment but thumbs up worthy for sure...

He is a preacher in the religion of scientism.

@@christofl6523 Science isn't a religion.

He would probably take you over a flat earther as well... I’m sure there’s a compliment in there somewhere.

@@thomasmichael2766 It is today.

I high on perfectly legal Hash here in Canada ^^

I doubt that being high has anything to do with it being mind blowing.

@@ZeroOskul Sometimes it allows you to see it in a different way.

You're smoking too much if you think the actor Neil DeGrasse Tyson is anyone legit.

@@ZeroOskul It's mind blowing regardless, for sure. But when your brain is impacted by THC it certainly makes existential dilemmas like the meaning of life, the big bang and outer space seem even more insane and overwhelming. On a daily basis your brain becomes accustomed to just accepting it all and taking it for granted but there's nothing like getting a little high and contemplating it all, it's pretty wild.

You do realize that the speech recognition and autocorrect are not fully developed technologies, right?

What?

@@47f0 Neil the grass is always greener on the other side of the planet Tyson

Neil, the grass is Tyson chicken for Jewish space lasers.

@@AdamWestish 😂 seriously I do love him though. He’s so funny

Except that the why cannot be answered, but sure you can make stuff up. aka religion (which is what he said - wondering if you listened to THAT).

They must necessarily be at odds with each other, because religion/faith does not care about truth, only belief. You can't get to truth from faith, because nobody with faith will ever be able to tell if they're the ones who are wrong. You claim that they don't overlap, and yet they do. They must overlap at truth. And religion doesn't.

Facts man, facts

I think climate deniers acknowledge global warming is real without noticing it

....Louie G: "Maybe we can build a whole new moon, but this one is a giant air conditioner" ~Trae Crowder's joke

Most of Climate Change deniers have a Financial interest in our Present day Energy systems and their stocks in the energy field! Our Elected Officials should not be owning Any Company Stocks, a business or interests in a business! This breeds corruption! Example: TRUMP!

@@kellibarnhouse6591 Oh 100%! I think the other side of that coin is it is so overwhelming for some people its easier to deny it than except the seriousness of it. AND then you have those who just don't want to make the lifestyle changes we need to. Either they are afraid of change or just plain lazy. Again easier to deny it.

Louis G is a nut 🙃🤣😂

If "holding" was customary for all the major philosophers 😂

Post of the day and great call! Your hypothesis needs more love....

What is the most relevant question. What, why, where, when, who are the 5 that matter. What, when, where, why are very important. But WHO decides the what, why, when, & where influences all the latter questions!

@@lnss8775 "Who" is irrelevant until you determine the "how." If it was a natural process, then there is no "who." You may say that creation requires a creator, but that's just bad tautology, because if we call it reality instead, we find no need of a realtor.

@@BlackEpyon so u switch to a theoretical saying "if it was a natural process." Who will always determine the how or why

@@lnss8775 There are two problems with this "God of the Gaps" fallacy you keep trying to invoke. The first is that the history of science has shown that you only make progress when you stop assuming that God did it. Further, WHEN the relevant cause is discovered and studied, invoking a god to explain it becomes irrelevant. The process always works without that hypothesis. The second is that discovering that there was agency involved does not necessarily tell you which agent it is. For that reason, if you look at the beauty of the trees (pick an example, it doesn't matter), and assume that it was the god of the Bible that's responsible for the tree's creation, another man from a different religion would claim that it was HIS god, not yours. Neither of you would be justified, even if one of you WERE correct, because neither of you have done the work to determine the cause. But what's worse, is that neither of you would even be CAPABLE of convincing the other, and for the same reason: neither of you have done the work, and neither of you can demonstrate your claims. IF a "who" was involved, you don't discover it by invoking the "God of the Gaps" fallacy, you discover it by reverse engineering the method by which the object of study was produced. In the case of the trees, the process involved is always some form of selection, be it artificial or natural. Claiming that trees were produced by God saying, "let there be trees," is no more useful than saying that trees are made with the "Bippity-Boppity-Boo" spell. Until you can repeat or demonstrate the process by invoking the"Bippity-Boppity-Boo" spell, then the claim is meaningless, as is claiming that God did it. We can reverse engineer the process of evolution through the fossil record, through cladistics, through genetics, etc, and by live observations in the field, and in the lab. We can CONFIRM that evolution happens. But nobody has EVER observed an act of "Creation." Until that happens, you can shut up with these "who" questions. "Who" is irrelevant until the "how" has been determined.

@@BlackEpyon I understand what ur trying to say but I think ur misunderstanding what I meant. But some of ur conjecture isn't built on facts like u claim. I wasn't referring to God of gaps lol. I actually don't even invoke God! When I say who is more important, we must first understand that winners write history! So until you understand the who questions I can say the same to you, shut up about ur how questions lol. Science is rooted in mathematics & most of "what" we know or think we know is by way of manmade construct; ex: we say there are 365 days a year or 24 hrs in a day, WHO determined that? U can argue science or math but if u rly break it down those values are manmade, not actual proof! Yes we can confirm evolution happens, but not in the way most ppl identify evolution(ex: man comes from apes.) And ur factually wrong about nobody ever observing creation lol. If u think that's true then udk what creation means. Its basic definition is the act of bringing something into existence. I guess nobody has ever saw a sperm enter an egg to make it fertile & CREATE LIFE! Or maybe cloning; which is literally the CREATION of an identical copy of whatever organism is cloned. But since u wanna bring up the god of the gaps which is ironic in that science can't explain everything, remember most of what we accept as scientific fact is based on theories because what we call scientific fact evolves over time lol

No she won't : she'd rather make stuff up. Does she look like she listens to anybody about anything ?

The lizard people sprouted dragon wings. Obviously..

@@TheNefastor Well, her idiot voters...

@Zack Smith you must mean Jaïna 😉

I’d rather the show not have on faux-scientists acting like they think cogently.

Or maybe Bill can get a Facebook and take his interrupting, foolery elsewhere.

No joke!

How are you doing William ?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i7yfgKtmrLuqgqM.html

Onion Headline : Confused Primitive Extraterrestrial Shrugs, Takes Huge Bite Of Golden Record

Dude!!! I just added a comment about this very thing!!! I'm just glad that after 40 years, watching that movie has finally paid off!

Do NOT blame "Jews In Space"! Their theme is a minor revision of the ancient Brooksian song "Men In Tights"! This is the work of "Spaceballs"! "Oh, sh*t! There goes the planet." ::sigh::

MTG said yesterday she doesn't believe in evolution 🤣 No surprise really, she's not that smart and won't believe anything when there is proof, only when there's none. Like all Trumpists i guess.

I can actually make just as big evolutionary changes happen... if you give me the same amount of time. Let's check in on that experiment in another 4 billion years.

Yeah, i knew this trumpster who was so stupid that he voted for the guy with dementia instead just because the media had convinced him to hate trump so much. What an idiot.

My Bible says different... From science.

@@ekgr212 - That's one thing Trump can brag about (and did brag about). He passed the dementia test by reciting "man, woman, camera, person, TV"... although no actual dementia test includes words so closely related, so maybe he failed it but couldn't remember.

@@RictusHolloweye Go to the search bar and type in "46 minutes of joe biden talking nonsense", watch just a little bit of it, then come back and try and talk to me about Trump's cognitive ability. Maybe the kids rubbing his hairy legs in the pool comment and such will make more sense to you than it did to me, but idk....truth is, you hate Trump too much to even realize what the other side has you rooting for instead. The expression "can't see the mountain for the hills" comes to mind. Or in this case, can't see the truth for the hate.

How are you doing ?

Actually, that’s just his opinion- hardly brilliant

So refreshing to meet a human being that has all the answers about all the mysteries of the universe and more. Or not.

someone who finally gets it :)

But if you take into consideration the extremely short time frame (compared to any credible estimates about the age of the universe) of all our observations, how confident can one be about the results gained by extrapolating so far outside the data set (in regards to time and distance)?

@@mikaoljakka2013 true, not like 13 billion years is "short" lol but yeah, i don't take everything they say as gospel, but i'd say it makes the most sense. There is a mysterious element to it, like i ask myself those questions Bill put forth at the beginning...that's where Tyson and i diverge. Like what was here "before" and "why". He talks about the "how". I'm fine with that EDIT: oh the short time frame of our calculations.....yeah i know....that part! LOL

We are definitely not alone but we may never know who else there is. In our own Galaxy we MAY be alone now and for the timespan of our existence. That we might find out 😁

Trust me you don’t. They cut it off just on time. I watched last night on HBO. It went off the rails right after they cut it. Bill was actually pissed.

@@kydalchemy Yes it was weird. I thought he might have just been playing Devil's advocate to rile up Tyson, but Bill seemed agitated and defensive toward him.

@@AbstractM0use At once point during the alien discussion I thought they were doing a bit of a put on. Then Bill grew more impatient and then I knew.

@Chelsea King so uncomfortable! Lol I almost had to turn it off, then, I’m sure you remember it just ended abruptly and Maher ran off there super quick to the guest panel, which wasn’t much better. Maybe something was in the air or water because that political scientist woman was also being defiant and argumentative. Lol it was definitely lively.

All you'd see is Bill acting even more like an uninformed asshole....'Trump is the lone badguy, not the millions of people that gave him power.' Sure. Know how a cancerous tumor forms? Individual cancer cells. Simple. Let's start holding people accountable.

Everybody in it was really hot!!!

But it's riotous when NDGT and Bill Maher delve into ot

I felt the same way! Totally over NTD as of today! He was rude to Bill, and his insults to Navy pilots who experience what we cannot, he wanted to shut them down? For a guy who is supposed to be smart - he came across as a closed minded unpleasant man.

I was thinking the same thing. So, it was like a 4-way glitch affective the camera on the plane, the pilot and other person in the plane, as well as the radar system, all glitching in exactly the same way. NDT is strange on this issue. He seemingly won't even acknowledge the possibility that any of the videos sightings are real, let alone that they're seemingly way beyond known human technology.

This was amongst many things he said that I found lacking. Likening experienced navy pilots to common observers and "glitchy/artifactual" multi million dollar sensors

@@JCaesar11 The other thing that bothers me is the lack of curiosity. Here's a man who normally talks about how he was so inspired by scientific mysteries during his life. But now there are these new mysteries, which have already inspired many people like me, and could inspire many millions more people. And NTD is just kind of like "Uh, not interesting. It's probably a software glitch or something."

@@joebutler9850 I get the feeling that whatever interest or wonder he once had has now been supplanted by a desire to earn as much money as possible. He's doing a tour of talkshows and podcasts pimping his new book. I was always somewhat dismissive of the whole UFO phenomena but Cmdr David Fravor amongst others are highly compelling expert witnesses which makes how dismissive he is of them even more infuriating and frankly disrespectful.

Well, there are likely people out there who may be smarter than NDT, but they're few and far between. There are only 1500 people on Earth with an IQ higher than 180. They seem to find their ways into think tanks. I'm happy with NDT doing science comedy like this.

Lol….. he acts like he’s much, much smarter than what he really is.

You clearly were not listening. Summer school for you, and no more swimming in the Adult Section

Love it!😆😆😆

Right. But, as Bill elucidated, "was 'nothing' something?" 😂

Ah, a reference to good Sir Terry Pratchett. You are a man of culture, I see.

@@neuralmute "stories of imagination tend to upset those without one" Thanks for mentioning the author. Long summer ahead🏖️📚🍹

I think along those lines. I think “universes”are collapsing and Big Banging endlessly and there are more “universes” than our own or it is one infinite universe with areas collapsing and big banging infinitely. I don’t believe in “one” beginning, as that then infers a “god” thing that started it. I also believe as we develop better space telescopes and can see further the entire age of the universe will go out the window as we see the further distance we can see the older it is.

@@jvs333 I so hope I am alive when we figure out the universe.

@@A_Derpy_NINJA I don’t think that is a possible thing to do, existence is unanswerable as each new discovery only leads to further questions. It’s an endless dog chasing tail

MTG said yesterday she doesn't believe in evolution 🤣 No surprise really, she's not that smart and won't believe anything when there is proof, only when there's none. Like all Trumpists i guess.

Where did the mind come from to bang?

Fuck that. He’s a corporate high road posing as a constitutionalist, Means that he’s a capitalist posing as a liberal..

@@72marshflower15 Who's a what? Capitalism is an economic concept and liberalism is a political lean, they do not cancel each other out. That's like comparing a sedan to a sedan that runs on diesel. It's still a sedan. A supercab pickup truck can also run on diesel. It's still a supercab pickup truck. That is: a liberal can be a capitalist and a conservative can ALSO be a capitalist. A liberal can be a communist and so can a conservative. Money does not lend itself to any one side of the political spectrum, we all use money to buy stuff and we live by the way money is gotten.

Yeh. Keep giving him your money for books that answer nothing

Stop lying

Why? So he can royaly screw that up, too? Money matters, except when dealing with a con man. Watch me! Follow me! See that I am a liar! Woo hoo! Science nothingness with this guy! Stop elevating him with the actual Cosmos!

@@kellykapowski1969 like I'm going to believe you

@@kellykapowski1969 Maybe you should consider having your dosage adjusted.

@@randeman Yeah, because anytime anyone says they don't like someone they must be on pills. Try again. You need to expand your mind, fella.

@@kellykapowski1969 I am just thrilled to find someone of your intellect. Usually, one must go to an Alabama WalMart to meet someone with such pearls of wisdom.

To not be interrupted by a New Yorker, you have to be a New Yorker. It's NOT Neil and it never has been, it's New York.

@@ZeroOskul haha, yes, Bill is a New Yorker, and I suppose after living there for 20 years that I'm one too. But watch Neil on his most recent visit with Joe Rogan (if you can stomach it) or countless other symposiums, etc. and you'll see what I mean. It used to be chronic and was painful to watch. I can link examples if you like...

@@bafflezbiz You just hold up a finger and say: "Aah-ah! Hey..." and go on.

@@ZeroOskul sure, but they're in front of cameras and I'd say a little courtesy goes a long way. As I said, NDT was on best behavior and I didn't see a single blatant interruption. But unfortunately, this is the exception to the rule.

Alright, I haven't watched/vetted this version (linked below) yet but the thumbnail is from that episode and the title appears to generally describe what I'm referring to. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p92Ki7VjtdLHdYE.html

You won't hear about it, you have to read about it.

@@meatgravylard I have Googled it, but haven't really found anything substantial in print...

@s.k How do you know?

That is not what Infinite Space means. The circumference of a circle is infinite. you can start it and end it at a definite point but it has no personal start or end point.

@@ZeroOskul but the circle didn't create itself.

@@BonjourP I don't claim to know anything special, but my experiences with psychedelics did make it easier to grasp the concept of infinity. I dunno lol

@@ZeroOskul That's deep lol. All I know is that with LSD, everything is infinite, both on the macro and the micro. I can't really explain it, you had to be there haha! Have a fantastic day, peace. :)

I gave up too. Neil is anything but a good listener

Intelligent ppl tend to value their words over all others.

@@fliptophiphop1894 no, just rude people. I certainly hope it’s possible to be intelligent and polite. I understand what you mean though.

He wants you to buy his book, that's it!

I prefer real poo.

Lol

I laughed so hard at this. 😂

Semi true when you get away from gravity time slows down, makes you wonder when you get away from a Galaxy in the space between spaces what really happens to time or if it even exists outside gravity or gravitational pulls of galaxies. What if time stops outside the Galaxy and light travels faster maybe we are seeing other galaxies in real time or closer than we thought.

Time and space came into existence, so there's no when, where or before. Difficult to get your head around, though.

"Both of these physical phenomena were emergent from the Big Bang" Nope, the spacetime in its entirety, which is what we call universe, it was either created all at once, or was always there. All time is contained in this geometric structure that means your entire life, with every single event. And of course all the events that might occur. That has been stable for more than 100 years. What we call time, it is our perception through the level curves of this surface. We have no idea if is an emergent property of the particles in this universe, or else. There is no explanation to consciousness, we only know when it turns on or off, and that is about it. "Therefore what happened "before" the Big Bang may not make sense" Of course it makes sense, because if you have "Big crunches" and "Big bangs" in sequences, you would have systematic creations and destructions of universes, and it could be the same universe retracting, or clusters that would be created in them. It would make sense if you are an entity, and you go through these new surfaces, the same as we go through this "block universe" we go through (which being static, it does not even have to be experienced in order. As far as we know you could jump from unit time to unit time with the illusion of order. The space time is ordered through chains of causality, your experience of it since it is not explainable, you simply cannot tell. There is still a monstrous numbers of questions regarding what we are and where we came from, or if our perception is somehow an emergent property of a phenomenon which we have no idea yet, or that we are not even here, because our perception does not count to explain the "story"(life) we go through (which was here before us, being "us" the "witness")

@@njits789 Or, it was always there. A film(as in a movie), when each second being a frame of the movie, our experience is the viewer, but the film was either always there or created at once. That analogy seems to work for some

Y'all sounding more like Rajesh,Howard, Leonard & Sheldon. How many more comment exchanges before the debate of comic hero's, Star Trek, Starwars, & women begin? 😂😂

@Zack Smith Georges Lemaître, although a priest from Belgium was quite the astute physicist, astronomer, and mathematician. His religion did not create the theory, his rigourous studies did. Einstein did not like his theory of an expanding universe at first but Einstein also didn't like quantum mechanics.