I think they respect on another

They did interrupt each other but not that often

Looks like they were on video call and delay, have to listen and then talk.

Literally the moment I saw this title my first thought was "Wow who will win the most-interruptions award" lol.

They were interrupting specifically Piers lol. Great topics but can get annoying

Thank you so much 🙏

In the existence where we live, God said there is ONLY good or evil. We are made in the image of God & it's a choice as to whom we choose to serve. God set down rules, laws, commands & teachings to which all of mankind will be judged. God said he will not allow these forbidden pleasures into the Kingdom of Heaven: homosexuality, murder, fornication, adultery, liars, thieves, gossipers, usurpers or idol worshipers...because these rebellious acts are not OF God, but they are OF Satan. Tyson, in a NUT shell, is serving the world & all its chaotic thinking, speaking & acting. As in Sodom, where its citizens chose to change themselves into both sexes & reject the laws of God, Sodom was destroyed, obliterated, so that not a living thing has grown or housed another human being, nor grown a blade of grass, for centuries. Tyson IS a false prophet who promotes the kingdom of the world. If you don't know God, you'll believe anything he says.

Nice. Cheers 🪐 LOVE Neil! ✨

Thank you, this is very helpful. 16:30 is interesting. Neil talks about how repeating falsehoods over and over again leads people to believe they are true. Neil actually uses this. In his attacks on religion he has uses five false histories which he repeats over and again. His fictitious histories have been very effective in driving people from faith. The efforts of anti-theists have had two effects: 1) Churches are in decline. Church memberships of all faiths are falling. 2) By driving rational thinkers from our churches, Tyson et al have made our churches, mosques and synagogues more toxic. In my opinion the first is a negative trend. I'd guess Richard Dawkins, Neil Tyson et al would disagree. The 2nd is a negative trend no matter your point of view. Someone may be thinking "Five false histories? What is he going on about?". I will talk about one Neil's fictions here. Tyson likes to say Newton could have easily done Laplace's n-body perturbation theory in an afternoon. After all Newton invented calculus and explained elliptical orbits on a dare, in two months -- all before he turned 26. But Newton just stopped because he had God on the brain. Newton did not just stop. He returned to the n-body problem again and again throughout his lifetime. In particular Newton invested a great deal of time and effort trying to model the 3-body system of the earth, moon and sun. Tyson's claim is demonstrably false from the get go. Regarding inventing calculus on a dare -- Halley's famous question was asked in 1684 when Newton was in his 40s. So this "dare" didn't occur before Newton turned 26. Newton didn't reply to Halley "I don't know" and then come back two months later with the answer. Newton told Halley inverse square gravity results in elliptical orbits, that he had calculated it. And so he had. Newton had been working on the problem for around two decades. So this bit about Newton working it out in two months is also false. There is some truth to Newton working on calculus before he turned 26. Isaac Barrow was Newton's older Cambridge colleague. Barrow, Fermat, Descartes, Cavalieri and others had laid the foundations of calculus in the generation before Newton and Leibniz. In 1665 Barrow made Newton aware of these efforts. Newton spent the next three years organizing these ideas and adding his own. So, again, not in two months. It was three years on Newton's part -- and decades from men in the generation prior to Newton. And obviously not because of Halley's "dare" made nearly twenty years later. Tyson talks about scientists strive to agree based on evidence. Which works great if all the players are interacting honestly and in good faith. This is not the case with Tyson. People were telling Tyson of his errors regarding Newton as early as 2014. So far as I know Tyson has never admitted error nor made any effort to correct the misinformation he's spread. Tyson, Dawkins, et al are happy to let this story remain in circulation. Never mind that it's addled and false. So long as it is effective they will conveniently ignore the fact that it's steaming mound.

31:00-39:00 is the “bullshitting to cover my ass” section

Neil deGrasse Tyson never said anything specific about Ukraine or Russia, or if there are nasiz in these countries or what tools to use to find out if there are. I personally think nationalists are the only thing that keeps nation separate from any neighboring nation that might otherwise very similar. Even states in USA want to be seen as different and separate , that also is form of nationalism.

Make Good Politicians!!!!!

​@Nauda999 no patriotism is needed. Nationalism is just patriotism made fascist.

@@user-nz6bk7lf8uPatriotism is Nationalism made Globalist/neo-Liberal?

@@user-nz6bk7lf8uLOL no it isn’t. Nothing is wrong with nationalism. At all period.

@gary Like men landed on the moon? Is that the kind of truth that you're referring to?

Glad I wasn’t the only one who caught that. Piers has no shortage of grenades.

The VC lag between the two didn't help tho

Don’t most physicists have reasonable social skills?

@@uriituw not really. There are a few really good ones and the others are so dry and uninspiring. Aside from Neil, there's Brian Greene, Brian Cox, Lawrence Krauss, and Lisa Randall

@@mikej6529 Do you think the majority of physicists don’t have good social skills?

And an absolute sausage

Not everyone loves NDT. He is a joke, so is Piers.

I for one think the dude is a complete shill who is an astrophysicist who can't even change a car tire

@@fugitivetattooEh you’re infinitely more irrelevant and probably will never amount to anything.

@@fugitivetattoo but why do you love him

@@fugitivetattooSo very true. The neophytes of course disagree.

Probably because he's speaking less

@@MB-bv9mr 😅Less is more sometimes

So glad he left that horrible British tv show where they tried to keep him from expressing his opinion about the Harkles

@@beniamino939 fr tho, sometimes adding less adds more

Yeah, like he did some thinking and said to himself he ain't gonna be remembered as a yesman.

... and exceptionally self-absorbed .

He also has a gravitas to his voice that makes you want to just shut up and listen

Not to mention a huxtering snake-oil salesman

​@dunestudios7395 which of your personal truths did he disagree with?

@@@AsimovVibes That we landed on the moon..

Tyson calling out twitter is propaganda..

@@pata6129 ok. people will always find something to cry about.

@@JudgeDredd_ so tyson can point out what he thinks twitter is the matriarch of?.. but i cant point out 4chan was doing what he is spotlighting twitter is doing years before twitter decades even.....

@@pata6129 No no you’re fine and you probably have a valid point. I just find it hilarious that someone can’t leave a positive post on KZfaq without the comment underneath it being like, “yeah but…”

@@JudgeDredd_ but not enough debates..

And then he came out with the Andrew Tate Interview. Ba Dum Tssss

Really, he sounded logical when he explained how and why he changed his mind about the ability of the vaccine to stop and then not to stop the spread of covid but he never expalined why he was so gullible as to belive in the propoganda in the first place.

If only he would stop interrupting.

Interrupting and talking over the guest?

@@keithwilliams1243 yeah they were talking about mostly fundamental facts here so u can’t really have an opinion against it which is why there’s not so much arguing like any regular interview ha

He's ageless and hope he never retires.

I think humor keeps him young. It's all the flat earthers. They're an endless source of entertainment 🤣🤣🤣

When Dr. Tyson talks people shut up and listen. 🙊

@@kalijasin Yeah because you can’t get a word in.

Probably Richard Feynman is his mentor.

@@AttiMatter And Piers Morgan is so much better, go back to sleep silly. 😂

@@passenger-rider No absolutely not haha, don't think I'm defending piers when I'm bashing Neil. Those two are two peas in a pod!

*Perimeter

@@Hotobu Thanks for correcting me!

definitely stumped! Neil's opinion is way overrated.

I'd say he worked harder than musicians.... They can talk about notes... He talks about eveything else.. Lol I'm a musician myself. I'll bow to Neil and his knowledge

What was the concert?

I'm confused; aren't Concerts for entertainment and edification? Astro- Physics are for enlightenment, knowledge, and wonderful interests In our existence. Musicians need your Money to fulfill their wants, and needs. Dope,cars, house's, women, parties, new Equipment, jewelry, new teeth, rehab, vacations, boats, children, ex-wifes, studios, back up singers, family, friends, Managers, security , insurance, wetbars, Motorcycles, buses, penthouses, doctors, surgery, guns, hot tubs, lawyers, Clothes, mistress, private detectives, body guards, chiropractor, masseuse, Psychiatrist, new socks . Neil needs your Money for nice ties.

Eww he asks for money to see him? Lmao

@@Tyrant604 What's wrong with that? Time is money and he's a person in demand. Nothing forces anyone to pay it, and he does tons of free interviews on KZfaq.

You are STILL on a channel that gossips and lies...& 'you' STILL aren't aware of the difference in good & evil. In the existence where we live, God said there is ONLY good or evil. We are made in the image of God & it's a choice as to whom we choose to serve. God set down rules, laws, commands & teachings to which all of mankind will be judged. God said he will not allow these forbidden pleasures into the Kingdom of Heaven: homosexuality, murder, fornication, adultery, liars, thieves, gossipers, usurpers or idol worshipers...because these rebellious acts are not OF God, but they are OF Satan. Tyson, in a NUT shell, is serving the world & all its chaotic thinking, speaking & acting. As in Sodom, where its citizens chose to change themselves into both sexes & reject the laws of God, Sodom was destroyed, obliterated, so that not a living thing has grown or housed another human being, nor grown a blade of grass, for centuries. Tyson IS a false prophet who promotes the kingdom of the world. If you don't know God, you'll believe anything he says.

Since… one interview ago..?

Completely agree

@@rorymilne862 😅

Except for the one with Tate where he interrupted him every 3 seconds

Ohh don't you worry..most of the time, you don't have a chance in the matter 😂

LOL. Bahaha. This was said not ironically? Ouch

Neil is one of those guys that is hard not to like. His enthusiasm is addictive 👍👍🇬🇧.

Michio Kaku is above

​@blakemcleroy4812 Both Michio and Neil are the pinnacles in their field. I prefer Neil, he's never condescending.

That's what happens when you recognise that you're not talking to some non-expert that you can pull the usual BS.

Neil is a very good science communicator and Michio is a great physicist. @@Ceba-pw8hk

is

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r7qZebuG16uxj3k.html

He just talks far too much and likes to hear himself on, he’s narcissistic as hell if you ask me, met him once, only his opinion was right.

@@saltytree729 ever thought ... Maybe .... He was right 😂

@@TLDW31 haha nah mate that’s why I said opinion, we were talking about something non factional as in not a definitive answer on the subject yet. He’s like that in interviews though just watch him even when he’s outright wrong he’s like a politician and just absolutely baffles you with bullshit to try and divert what he said minutes ago. We were talking about something in my field of expertise which he isn’t or even remotely known for but just yea…

Because he's the only interviewer who will interrupt as much as Neil does. They neutralize each other.

Let’s not get carried away

Neil on JRE was hilarious, you could tell Joe was frustrated by being interrupted so much haha

​@@RileyD125 don't think he invited him after that.

@@RileyD125 but should the host let the guest talk as much I mean that’s why he is on the show?

Piers need the indian man the myth of sadghuru his show kick off, but been honest I don't think he could interview

Tyson calling out twitter is propaganda.. Clearly tyson does not understand the internet..

I hope you also' to realized' that you need to improve your English.

@@MrMarco855 I apologize sir but English is not my first language please forgive me

@@@rodflo2979 Oh Lord. I apologize. My fault. Forgive me for being rude.

what? have you even listened to what hes saying cos if that is a scientist we are in so much effing trouble

​@@casscamden740 a closed mind is hard to open.

@@Dawn_Aramoana63 A mind is like a trash can - leave it open long enough, it will fill with garbage.

I prefer Lawrence Krause, Dawkins, and Bill Nye. Neil is a good communicator, but for true understanding, I pick Krause.

@@conneryshand. Krause has his problems too, though. When he's not talking science on a TV show, he's out being incredibly condescending towards anyone he doesn't like.

Sings: “It ain’t necessarily so...” 🎤

but Not Piers, watch the Stephen Colbert and NDGT interviews, great energy back n forth!😃

I usually listen to him when I'm taking a dump. Shit coming from every direction.

@@MrMarco855 charming dude, really charming!

Until you hear Neil talk about vaccines 🤣

@@mediamisfits3805vaccines are fine. I can live with that , even if I disagree with him. Neil talking about gender tho…

Hi what do you think they made better? Thanks

Tyson calling out twitter is propaganda.. Clearly tyson does not understand the internet..

@@jamesm1736 you are probably right. The people that could benefit from the information/explanations Neil provides are probably no listening or comprehending.

@@pata6129 perhaps you didn’t understand him and his points.

This is your god science? Men and women,..nothing else...........understand? Only the devil believes otherwise.

How many do you know

@@arlen9190 don't know about Catherine, but for me it's: Neil and Dr. Becky, I like them both

Probably only knows the very famous ones.

My favourite is Raj Koothrappli

@@thetaikonaut8397 what famous ones are there besides neil?

Tyson calling out twitter is propaganda.. Clearly tyson does not understand the internet..

Piers interrupting guests every 5 seconds... Not with this imposter,💯

@@pata6129 thats your opinion / perception.

@@Sosoph098 he litterally could of picked SO many other sites and entities to reference that have a much larger impact than twitter about said topic..

@@Sosoph098 tiktok,facebook,youtube have had Far more significant impact on society than twitter.. 4chan is one of very mechas of toxic and valgure spawning pools of internet trops.. so yes propaganda and lack of experience on neils part..

"undervalued treasure" is always code for "many don't recognize the level of genius in XX person, but _I_ do and must differentiate myself from the layman's perception". Very few people have never heard of Sagan and his groundbreaking Cosmos series. Sagan created the model of accessible explainer of astrophysics to measure against. Neil was a natural successor to remake Cosmos for a new generation.

By condemning others for choosing not to get vaxxed? Neil is a shill for big pharma.

Should have been communicated honestly really.

Fauci knew he lied when he was against masks. In his own mind was in the public good to spare masks for frontline health workers. It was still a lie and it's bloody annoying to see someone exalt science and politik at the same time. That's why he's a planetarium director and not a serious astrophysicist. Don't get me wrong, he's a great science communicator, but if he want's to exalt science like it's a religion, then let's not forget this is someone who has not participated in the scientific process. That begins with not being intellectually dishonest

There is no bloody scientific view on how to deal with war and conflict. Disputes were traditionally resolved by the humiliating process of destroying someones philosophy and idea about the world. There is no scientific view on matters of politics, there is politics in science itself. There is science communication and there is coming up with stuff off the cuff and the two are bloody mutually exclusive.

Science is not exquisitely tuned to nothing, we are not in lord of the rings, scientists are not elves. There is garbage science, there is good science, there is hardly a corrective mechanism to discern the two. If we want to exalt science like a religion then we are lost. Let us not succumb to this medieval way of thinking.

Yes I agree completely! Humility: what a rare quality. So Refreshing, to say the least ✌️

Humility? Dude is a megalomaniac Lmao.

@@Kreenick The PBD ep hahahaha

Loveliest science guy on Internet!

Na he's still a nob

@@adamstokoe1 Maybe...we will see if he really changes or not...

Its definitely worth doing, podcasts are good too. I know they can be long, break it down and listen on the go. Keep it up.

david Attenborough

Ditto your comments! I agree with the weird bit. When Rogan said some machines were ‘ not of this world’ I was off.

do your self a favour and search David butler. he's a professor at -i think Stanford university, that teaches brilliant lessons about space online. it will definitely improve your attention span

But that's the thing - scientists who do that usually have to sacrifice their scientific life to a degree, and not many are willing. You can't be a public spokesperson and fully committed to your scientific work at the same time. That is the same for any profession, you are basically doing two full time jobs, one is going to suffer. And the people you mentioned started doing their science communication only when their academic work ended/slowed down, in their later stages in life. Which is also what happens in other professions - at some point, you move from doing the work, to teaching it. Which is what they are doing. But if every scientist was like the folks you mentioned, no work would ever be done. Science is done by people in their 20's, 30's, early 40's, who basically LIVE science and don't have much else to do. And you are not getting those people to come and communicate with the public. Which is why you didn't have Niel or Brian doing the things they are doing in their 30's when they were on the frontiers of scientific work and discovery.

And repeating the same behaviour , with an expectation of a different result , is more a symptom of ocd than insanity, for God Sakes.

Piers called the quote apocrypha. That’s good enough for me.

G

Teachers in general probably refrain from doing that in most conversations

993l 999999999999999

Finally they have found their match

Tip to not get interrupted during a conversation keep talking and finish your point. And don't leave large gaps and if you do get interrupted find a empty conversation point and interrupt back and continue your stuff. It's not that deep. Play the game or don't play at all. complaining about the rules won't change the game of public speaking 😊 If it's private conversation that's where the rules are up to U your friends & family.

Who said anything about practice? Practically-perfect people never permit sentiment to muddle their thinking.

@@ochrechap what are you talking about? He said that he went home after his first TV appearance and practiced sound bites in front of the mirror in order to get people interested in astrophysics.

@@jftt42 he lied. The intention to humbilise often brings about lies. White lies. Not dark lies. That mirror never DID exist!