Nerve resection in tumor- why doctor held negligent- why informed consent is must?/ law and doctor

  Рет қаралды 274

law and doctor

law and doctor

Ай бұрын

here in this case patient was suffering from the tumor of thigh for last 15 year and the tumor was suspected malignant during surgery so doctor to save the life preferred to serve the nerve. but patient filled a negligence case here. Why doctors still lost the case. know the law and what all happened in this case and learn from this case as take home msg so that one can learn from others mistake and take proper consent from the patient.
disclaimer: this video is made for education purpose only.
REF: Tulshiram vs Christanand cheritable trust & ORS.
NCDRC RP 850/2022, dt 12,4,2022 against FA/307/2015 SCDRC maharastra

Пікірлер: 2
@drdanand76
@drdanand76 Ай бұрын
What is blosam test
@lawanddoctor
@lawanddoctor Ай бұрын
Bolam test was used in earlier days where it was considered what doctor did to the patient was the best, and if majority of doctor behaves like that. So in negligence cases if he did according to peer group then he is not negligent.
Вечный ДВИГАТЕЛЬ!⚙️ #shorts
00:27
Гараж 54
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
HOW DID HE WIN? 😱
00:33
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
Incredible magic 🤯✨
00:53
America's Got Talent
Рет қаралды 70 МЛН
Your Body Is BEGGING For Vitamin D!!
53:14
Dr. Eric Berg DC
Рет қаралды 17 М.
DECOMPENSATED LIVER DISEASE clinical case presentation
1:55:22
THE WHITE ARMY
Рет қаралды 167 М.
Medical Negligence | Malpraxis | Dr Krup Vasavda
6:37
Forensic Medicine by Dr Krup
Рет қаралды 10 М.