New 152mm Cannon: Russia's T-14 Armata Just Got More Terrifying

Рет қаралды 58,863

5 күн бұрын

The arms race just got a significant boost. Russia recently announced the completion of trials for a new variant of its T-14 Armata tank, equipped with a monstrous 152mm cannon. This development marks a substantial leap in firepower compared to the standard 125mm gun and could potentially reshape the balance of power on the battlefield.
The T-14 Armata program has been a closely watched project since its inception. This next-generation tank boasts a crewless turret and advanced automation systems, already exceeding the capabilities of most modern tanks.
Military analysts have long discussed the possibility of a variant with a larger caliber gun, and now those discussions are turning into reality. The addition of this immensely powerful gun elevates the T-14 Armata to a whole new level, potentially granting it the ability to pierce through even the most heavily fortified enemy positions with devastating effect.
Now, with trials successfully concluded, the world waits with bated breath to see when and how this super-tank might be integrated into the Russian military.
There's no doubt that the latest T-14 Armata tank variant, boasting a formidable 152mm cannon, packs a much bigger punch than its predecessor. However, official Russian sources claim the upgrade goes deeper than just firepower.
__________________________________________________________________________
By kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Boevaya mashina - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/604, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Dmitriy Fomin from Moscow, Russia - T-14 Armata, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/604, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/604, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/604, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/..., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/..., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/..., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/651 - Vitaly V. Kuzmin, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/601, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/652, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/652, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Nickel nitride - Own work, CC0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/654, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
video-67359347_456262428
video-67359347_456262960
video-7770684_456246081
video-23168967_456240314

Пікірлер: 540

@trevorsutherland5263 4 күн бұрын

152mm is considered the lowest "naval" caliber gun. T-14 is now basically a rolling light cruiser...

@MoonlightVKV 4 күн бұрын

Su-152 also had a big cannon

@off6848 3 күн бұрын

@@MoonlightVKV KV-2 as well. Technically though the MAUS is the only tank fitted with an actual naval gun that I know of.

@leight420 3 күн бұрын

@@off6848maus was just a prototype

@christophggcyrus6861 3 күн бұрын

😂

@ViceCoin 3 күн бұрын

No obsolete cruisers on land. Drones and missiles are the future. Tanks will control drones and unmanned vehicles from the rear.

@giannisgt28rs 3 күн бұрын

152mm on tanks and 70mm in frigates..

@user-ty2pk9om8c 3 күн бұрын

У нас практиковали такой калибр в танках

@hyneksmid3293 3 күн бұрын

but that 76 mm is autocanon

@jerromedrakejr9332 2 күн бұрын

Yes, but if size didn't matter, everyone would use a small water gun instead of a bazooka... and no matter how fast that small water gun shoots water, it will never beat the bazooka...

@swiftusmaximus5651 2 күн бұрын

57mm Bofors on some Frigates. Front armor on a tank turret is 8 to 12'' thick. A destroyer , just 1'' thick

@nfineon 3 күн бұрын

Forget the cannon, they need an ANTI-DRONE variant, with full ECM jamming, drone countermeasures and serialized "cope cages" for modern warfare. All I see is another moving target, doesn't matter how big the main cannon is when a $5,000 drone wipes it out.

@maxbide1404 3 күн бұрын

Il n'y a pas un char indestructible. Mais pas pour autant qu'il ne faille pas reconnaitre la puissance d'un char ou d'ingénierie.

@macakucizmama831 3 күн бұрын

I am pretty sure they are aware of it? But I would not say that one cheap drone is enough to destroy it, it also has next generation armor. But anti drone systems including radar is a must. It has a machine gun, but is it anti drone as well idk. I also think that lasers are future of anti drone systems. Beside everything else, jamming, firing, and other stuff

@alexanderjason434 3 күн бұрын

@@macakucizmama831jamming & maybe Gatling gun or full auto grenade launcher with “Buk” grenades

@Max_Da_G 3 күн бұрын

What makes you think that the Afganit active protection system isn't tuned to destroy incoming drones? It's been designed to take out every ATGM under the sun, including vaunted Javelin. Not a problem to tune the interception radars to track and target those drones.

@Max_Da_G 3 күн бұрын

@@macakucizmama831 It already has a hard-kill Afganit APS. I don't see a possibility that it's NOT tuned for drone interception.

@ued2923 2 күн бұрын

WE NEED THIS SHIT IN WAR THUNDER!

@GamesTodayStreamXY 2 күн бұрын

yes we need it , hope gaijin will put this t14 on war thunder soon

@MohammedAzizi-rk7ot Күн бұрын

Gaijin will put it at 6.7

@95Molot Күн бұрын

On the donate

@feketeboti3301 Күн бұрын

12.0 sounds good with BMP-T

@bob-hg5qj Күн бұрын

@@feketeboti3301 nah put in it 1.3

@ravenguard7484 3 күн бұрын

Sounds like it will be used predominantly as mobile artillery.

@user-ty2pk9om8c 3 күн бұрын

Скорее всего да. Он не массовый в производстве и дорогой

@georgy1858 3 күн бұрын

Probably as a command tank as well, leading squadrons of t90m tanks. I've read somewhere that when the first armata tanks rolled out of the factory, that was their main purpose. It is outfitted with a drone canister, I believe, and an AFAR Doppler radar.

@Max_Da_G 3 күн бұрын

That's what Russians had been using tanks as for the entire time.

@user-ty2pk9om8c 3 күн бұрын

@@georgy1858да согласен.

@ravenguard7484 3 күн бұрын

@@Max_Da_Gwatched the video again and must have missed it the first time. Barrel life is short compared to same caliber artillery. I’m sure it’s not quite the same barrel as the artillery.

@torides. 3 күн бұрын

152mm cannon is an massively powerful thing. a 152mm apfsds shell probably can penetrate any mbt on the current battlefield but, the biggest problem of the current warfare is not tanks with stronger armor. its drones they need to make counter-drone systems instead of a bigger cannon.

@Max_Da_G 3 күн бұрын

It has a hard-kill APS. No reason why APS can't be tuned to kill drones.

@torides. 3 күн бұрын

@@Max_Da_G aps systems have a speed limit sorta thing for example most of the hardkill aps systems don't shoot at things slower than 150m/s(most of the tank rounds are faster than this speed)

@RichelieuUnlimited 3 күн бұрын

Based upon images of the 2A83‘s 152mm APFSDS shell, it’s unlikely that it would be a revolutionary thing as opposed to the Rh-130 or the ASCALON, as it’s penetrator is only about the same length as the LKE-II penetrator of the DM53, DM63 and DM73. There’s an upper limit to muzzle velocity, and the Rh-120 L/55A1 with DM73 already comes pretty close.

@Max_Da_G Күн бұрын

@@torides. Correct, they do have speed selection, however THAT is in radar software, not hardware. Drone can be recognized by its behaviour as a target. For example FPV drone isn't slow either, and when it's attacking a target it reaches some decent speeds. Tank rounds? Indeed. Muzzle velocity of a tank round is 1500-1700m/s. Afganit APS is stated to target incoming tank rounds to destabilize/degrade them.

@Max_Da_G Күн бұрын

@@RichelieuUnlimited Nothing in RH130 or ASCALON is revolutionary either. Fires a projectile. Nothing new. Muzzle velocity is one thing, while the projectile mass is wholly another. Also who told you the length of the 2A83 APFSDS projectiles? Or their construction, material, mass?

@BabyFroG45 3 күн бұрын

Considering 152mm is now the most widely produced round in the Russian inventory now it only makes sense to push forward with this idea. It would definitely streamline ammo production for both tanks and artillery.

@IgnatShining 3 күн бұрын

The 152mm smoothbore cannon rounds are not interchangable with the 152mm artillery rounds. Some manufacturing steps might be shared though and that can help with production indeed

@billwhoever2830 2 күн бұрын

@@IgnatShining what you say is correct but, the 152mm guided rocket round from the howitzers will be used by the tank

@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626 3 күн бұрын

Main Battle Self Propelled Artillery😂. 152mm is freaking arti round.

@flareamv5503 Күн бұрын

obj 292 was used as a test bed for 152 mm APFSDS and gun system

@averyjames9828 7 сағат бұрын

it's so stealthy you can't even see it in the battlefield

@Jpaxart 4 күн бұрын

If they haven’t come up with and effective solution to neutralizing the fvp drone threat then it’s going to perform the same as every other tank in the Ukrainian conflict.

@kenwiltshire7834 4 күн бұрын

If it already has a system to destroy anti tank rockets, Shouldn't take much to use it against drones.

@Jpaxart 4 күн бұрын

@@kenwiltshire7834 then they shouldn’t be worried about deploying them to the front

@makssharshkin7611 4 күн бұрын

The T-14 Armata has better defence from drones. Also new era armour for all Russian tanks successfully defend the tanks from drones.

@e-machine-ol1987 4 күн бұрын

I imagine that's a major factor in not deploying it since even with and active protection system there is a good chance it doesn't have enough charges to properly protect against drone attacks. Add the part where mobility kills in the conflict are often worse then having your turret knocked out of action, and I think its safe to say the T-14 will not be deployed to the front without major changes to both the tank and the stage of the conflict.

@bergssprangare 4 күн бұрын

The sky is owned bu the AI machines..This tank must be updated with an drone - a drone killer and target acquirer

@jamblman 3 күн бұрын

This tank is massiveley upgraded with respect to the original Armata.. 152 mm on a tank? wow

@upsetduck7566 3 күн бұрын

...WOOOOOWW....

@vertx706 3 күн бұрын

T-14 was always intended to carry 152, but was first given the 125 as the 152 wasnt yet finished

@w0lfgm 2 күн бұрын

From 1984/5, the USSR planed to upgrade tanks with 152 mm. Soviets tested Object 292, 299, 490, 490A, 477, 477A...

@andrewaustin6369 2 күн бұрын

The early designs for T14 featured a 152mm gun it was dropped due to the problems it would create the armata sort of being built now isn't capable of taking a 152mm gun without a major redesign and a much higher cost which given Russia can't afford to build the T14 well work out how likely this is to happen.

@justacat2 3 күн бұрын

yall don't realise how huge is 152mm, for example the caliber of an abrams is 120mm and the one of a t90 is 125mm

@user-qk9he7se5w 2 күн бұрын

There's gonna be 10 if that made so who cares russia cant mass produce this piece of junk 😂😂

@mark4371 2 күн бұрын

@@user-qk9he7se5w The biggest piece of junk is the Abrams That trash can on tracks was destroyed in Yemen by the Houthi Knowing this fact I do not understand why they sent them to Ukraine Worst modern tank ever made

@user-qk9he7se5w 2 күн бұрын

@@mark4371 except there's maybe what 40 blown up abrams compared to the 14000 world wide t72 russian crap

@user-qk9he7se5w 2 күн бұрын

Lets not forget mark russia so strong they ran out of t90 and t14 so they use barn shed and dirtbike chicken coup

@mark4371 2 күн бұрын

@@user-qk9he7se5w The T72 is hardly a modern tank Try attempting to read what I typed The Abrams destroyed by 1 RPG 7 in Yemen Absolute trash

@0zeref Күн бұрын

I saw a 500 drone flying saying have a good day boom 😂

@swiftusmaximus5651 3 күн бұрын

Drones are more terrifying

@povarful 2 күн бұрын

Building tanks doesn't make sense nowadays!

@haziq0007 Күн бұрын

At least it can buy you time,

@swiftusmaximus5651 Күн бұрын

@@haziq0007 to build more drones

@russellk.bonney8534 2 күн бұрын

That's the calibre of large artillery guns.

@progamerreal420 Күн бұрын

Good thing we wont be seeing any of those anytime soon

@Babyfaceassassin17 3 күн бұрын

no MBT on the modern battlefield could shrug off a shot from a 152mm cannon firing sabot rounds. Imagine the recoil as a crewman when that thing fires.

@user-vj6dc8le8h Күн бұрын

Подкалиберный снаряд в данном случае не нужен. Даже просто железная болванка весом 40кг просто снесет башню. Дёшево и просто.

@user-wr5mn6cp2u Күн бұрын

I’ll tell you a secret: in the war with Nazi Germany, the Soviet army massively used 152 mm self-propelled artillery guns, which were not much different from tanks, and the crew did not suffer in any way due to the use of hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical and other compensators, as well as ventilation of powder gases . Only the Germans suffered). Modern technologies are much more efficient

@Eyeswideopen100 3 күн бұрын

Russia using zelensky to market they're arms sales 😂

@user-ty2pk9om8c 3 күн бұрын

Вполне возможно

@MRXi0 2 күн бұрын

@@user-ty2pk9om8c It does both there tanks profrom bad same with the air defence but there ligth bombers like SU 34 and MI28 and KA52 is doing really well

@marcuswippi850 Күн бұрын

Seitdem die Kunden sehen, wie schlecht die russischen Waffen tatsächlich sind, sind die Absatzzahlen gewaltig eingebrochen. By the way, der Armata hat einen Motor, der nicht wirklich passt. Deswegen bleiben sie auch gerne einfach stehen! 😂

@user-wr5mn6cp2u Күн бұрын

@@marcuswippi850 But buyers saw how well American weapons burned, and began to buy them even more) An excellent advertising exhibition of NATO weapons in Moscow)) The Houthis are also excellent advertising agents for American weapons

@vincentromano187 3 күн бұрын

The tank is an absolute unit 👍

@colycycle4665 2 күн бұрын

object 292 upgraded gun? damn

@Micccck. 2 күн бұрын

Still looks like the 125mm but if they really continued the project from the late 80s that be wounderfull for Russia Altho i would add a extra 30mm auto cannon just in case

@RichelieuUnlimited 3 күн бұрын

There‘s an upper limit to potential muzzle velocity with conventional guns (which Russia supposedly already exceeded with its 2A82 design). There’s also an optimal length-diameter ratio for APFSDS. The only way to improve upon existing designs, assuming you’re already at the optimal shape and muzzle velocity, is a longer shell. So unless the 2A83 boasts a larger penetrator at the same velocity, there isn’t any benefit in terms of armor penetration capacity to the larger caliber.

@diIbert 2 күн бұрын

The tank platform is huge so might was well. Now its distinctive from its lil brother the T90. This now supertank can be used for more punch.

@azmalkhan01 4 күн бұрын

Russia has been continually improving its military tec

@TsarOfRuss 4 күн бұрын

War with NATO is inevitable at this point, Russia must be on high alert at all times!

@alfredchurchill2328 3 күн бұрын

@@azmalkhan01 yet is behind China and even further behind the west

@4RST Күн бұрын

if NATO actually fought someone that could defend itself there would be ALOT to improve

@RePlayBoy101 11 сағат бұрын

yea their t55 and t62 are pretty up to date

@off6848 3 күн бұрын

Krasnopol guided and thermobaric shells is WILD for a tank. Thats the problem I've concluded with western tanks severe lack of versatile ammo types. Mostly apfsds and canister shot with the rare heat and mpat shells.This makes them less suited to fire support missions and more like glorified tank busters except for one problem the t series refleks rocket guided shells out range the best apfsds rounds the west has

@tackytrooper Күн бұрын

The US is replacing most of its shells with the AMP round, which is much more versatile, and Russia has a comparable shell for the 125mm. Nobody really carries canister anymore. I am afraid your statement is rather dated.

@off6848 Күн бұрын

@@tackytrooper Ukrainians made this complaint themselves and I called it before they even sent them. AMP rounds would be an improvement but it’s still useful to stock dedicated HE for laying down indirect fire support as we saw actually happen during the battle of Krasnohorivka foothold where 113th DPR unit was able to transport troops in the turtle cage tanks then rtb and lay down fire support in their old t64s and 72s You can make fun of them for using old tanks all you want but at the end of the day it worked and Ukr groups driving western armor like 47th mechanized couldn’t do it if they wanted because they lack variety in munitions There’s a video of Ukr soldiers complaining about this I think it was reported by telegraph

@tackytrooper Күн бұрын

@@off6848 True, although I think doctrine is maybe the bigger problem there than ammunition necessarily - the US expected the Ukrainians to be mostly using the Abrams against tanks, and thus gave them mostly anti-armor munitions. This showed a profound lack of understanding in western leadership of the real nature of combat there.

@kindlingking Күн бұрын

Soviet tanks were first and foremost developed for infantry support and western tanks were largely influenced by soviet military doctrine in the 50-60s, that being a breakneck tank charge through the whole Europe. So NATO, having an advantage in nuclear warhead, had concluded all they need is to just stop soviet tank blitzkrieg and nuke the rest. That's why our tanks to this day prioritize simplicity of design and reliability (T-55, for example, had to stay combat ready while stranded amidst nuclear wasteland for prolonged time), where's western tanks are glorified self-propelled anti-tank guns.

@velimirkolundzija4451 2 күн бұрын

I hope that the replacement of the barrel or the increase in caliber on the T 14 Armata but will be done very quickly, since this is the only solution at the moment given the use of FPV drones. In essence, 152 mm is the minimum needed to destroy the fortifications, and at the moment it is the most important for the troops at the front. In essence, this is the best self-propelled howitzer in the world, which will have a much higher level of protection for the crew as well as other electronic device. Even if a stabilizer is installed at the rear with the replacement of the barrel, it will still be the best weapon at the front, given that, unlike the self-propelled howitzer, the T-14 Armata 152 mm will be able to fire at least the first shell from the move, and very accurately, which is the most important thing, and after that it could lower the stabilizers and fire the next 3-5 shells from the spot, and then move on

@jhuntotoyalmero281 3 күн бұрын

It's greatest enemy is an aerial suicide drone that is 10 to 20k Dollar....as well as all MBT in the battlefield as proven in the ongoing war in Ukraine. That is the main reason why Russia is not sending this unit in the battleground in Ukraine.

@sovietjacksion6928 3 күн бұрын

Isn't that overkill?

@_solaris_4057 3 күн бұрын

Russian 152 is on par with nato 130-140, considering their autoloader is still the shitass carousel it'll probably be 5% worse than nato penetrators.

@aceinternational4788 3 күн бұрын

@@_solaris_4057nope it’s a good auto loader that can load all rounds as it’s a crew less turret

@_solaris_4057 3 күн бұрын

@@aceinternational4788 its slow, other autoloaders do it quicker, t14 cannot do it quicker than 7.1 seconds, which is problematic as even in a straight fight a abrams will hit the t14 in the face twice before its done reloading once.

@w0lfgm 2 күн бұрын

No, If u wanna destroy enemy tank at 2km

@lancerevo9747 Күн бұрын

@@_solaris_4057how do you know it's slow when it hasn't even been used in battle yet? You seem like one of those clowns that said Russia is running out of tanks and artillery for 2 years. Don't talk about things you know nothing about with certainty. That's some propaganda bs.

@harrymaciolek9629 2 күн бұрын

Now if they could only build more than two a year.

@southyboy576 3 күн бұрын

All I know is that the Russians have the best names for their machines straight terminator vibes

@billwhoever2830 2 күн бұрын

Armata in Greek means tanks Arma is a tank In ancient times Arma meant chariot, since the Battle Tanks replaced the cavalry they are today called Armata Machis

@cherrypoptart2001 14 сағат бұрын

the 125mm 2A82-1M that the T-14s currently use are still very powerful guns , its apfsds shells vacum1 and vacum2 reportedly had a penetration of 900mm and 1000mm of rha equivalent penetration at 2km which was the most powerful apfsds in the world until the KF-51 made its debut. The 2A82-1M could have also fired smart munitions for dealing with low flying aircraft, infantry, fortifications , trenches similar to how what the US is currently testing, the XM1147 Advanced Multi-purpose , for their M1A2s and Abram X. 152mm cannon and shells would require more propellant to propell the bigger, heavier shells meaning a more dangerous amount of explosive substance stored within the tank

@Desire123ification 3 күн бұрын

Impressive! In the end, it would be a mixture of tanks on the battlefield along with BMPT protectors.

@jankohrasko5744 Күн бұрын

Every time someone mentions terrifying Russian weapons 😂😂😂

@castlerock58 2 күн бұрын

I thought that the reason the Russians went with the T-90 M instead of the T-14 was that they wanted to change the prototype before putting it into production. Modern weapons make it very difficult for tanks to operate on the battlefield or even reach it. They need to have effective defenses against missiles and drones. Russia had put 152mm guns on prototype tanks before. It may be making a comeback because it and launch longer range missiles and shells at enemy tanks and other targets.

@mik1984 2 күн бұрын

The upgrade to 152mm doesn't offer as much when it comes to penetration, because that is limited by the amount of energy you can put into the shell and same energy in a smaller shell is more penetration. This gun is probably going to shoot APFDS shells that are not much more powerful than the 125mm ones, although they probably going to be very powerful anyway. Tanks in the current conflict work as assault guns, and having a HE shell, cluster munition shell or thermobaric shell that is twice as heavy as the one in 125mm is very valuable when harassing enemy entrenched positions - which is what tanks seem to be doing - a single tank drives up to get line of sight on enemy positions, like a forest line or village, fires a shell, moves, fires a shell, moves, repeat a few more times, then drops smoke and leaves. With the barrel lifespan of 280 shots this tank is not going to be used as mobile artillery, unless for precision fire with a Krasnopol shell. Although, they probably have also designed the barrel to be easy to exchange and field repair units will have decent supply of spare barrels they can replace the used ones with, without the need of sending the tank back to factory.

@user-cb3oq5sy2s 4 күн бұрын

только солдаты, знающие войну, знают реальную разницу между 125 мм и 152 мм. На фронте такой танк ждут. Для совсем дурачков напомню, что новая пушка может вести огонь спецбоеприпасами с ядерной боевой частью.

@everdarkness 3 күн бұрын

только государственники, знающие путина, знают реальную разницу между Эклипс и Шехерезадой. В Геленджике такую яхту ждут. Для совсем дурачков напомню, что новая акводискотека может принимать гостей спецприпасами с ядреной алкогольной частью.

@user-cb3oq5sy2s 3 күн бұрын

@@everdarkness куд кудах? кудах тахтах? Простите, я плохо разговариваю на вашем языке. Пытаюсь только из моего глубокого к вам уважения.

@user-dl3nc4jx7k 3 күн бұрын

армата не будет воевать на украине, она готовится не для этого конфликта, и особого смысла в танковом боеприпасе с ядерной боевой частью нет, такой боеприпас нужен для сау , которая его закинет на несколько десятков км, думаю её допиливать будут ещё долго и пока не будет защита от тех дронов сделана и всеракурсный КАЗ в том числе и в верхней полусфере, этот танк в войска не пойдет

@Benz2533 3 күн бұрын

Thermalbaric warhead is not exactly nuke round tho.

@user-cb3oq5sy2s 3 күн бұрын

@@user-dl3nc4jx7k как раз наоборот. Для гарантированного уничтожения узловой точки вражеской обороны, ядерный боеприпас калибра 152 мм лучше всего выпускать прямой наводкой, с предельных дистанций поражения танка. Огонь с закрытой позиции неуправляемым боеприпасом это пальцем в небо, если речь идет о железобетонных конструкциях. Там нужно чтобы батарея била этими боеприпасами, в надежде чтобы хоть один попал. А танк тем и хорош, что он может относительно безопасно подъехать и вдарить, гарантированно поразив цель..

@QuicksilverVM 3 күн бұрын

people dont know what that means, it will be able to find targets with ai guided drone circling over it and fire krasnopol arti ammo at the target with a lot more range. its actualy another innovation by the russians, btw germany already copyed the t14 ^^

@randym7961 3 күн бұрын

LMAo you are not going to have any T-14s beyond the few you have and no one would copy it because it sucks .. Lies and BS wont win a war

@alexnderrrthewoke4479 3 күн бұрын

Copied what?

@knowahnosenothing4862 3 күн бұрын

Russia copied the US from the 70's prototype you mean?

@kampfer91 3 күн бұрын

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 German are making new leopard with automated turret instead of manned one .

@alexnderrrthewoke4479 3 күн бұрын

@@kampfer91 i know they copying russia now

@cherrypoptart2001 14 сағат бұрын

I remember they said they would have redesign the turret to fit the 152 and the autoloader. Wouldnt doubt if a completely new turret was designed since the T-14 has an extremely weak turret compared to T-72s, T-80s and T-90s , if we learn anything from Ukraine, drones specifically go after turret roofs and engine decks

@haziq0007 Күн бұрын

This tank will be a beast if they can pair it with an anti drone unit!

@Gurubashy Күн бұрын

I think tanks are a waste of money and time. a modernized BMP 3, with cage armor and better thermal vision for commander and drone integration would be better suited for any war. Having both a 100mm smoothbore gun and a 30mm autocannon it can deal with anything, from fortifications with 100mm HE rounds to long distance tanks with atgm shot through the 100mm cannon and infatry and other vehicles with the 30mm autocannon. Can also transport troops. A bmp-3 that can survive artillery sharpnel and fpv drones would do much more work on the battlefield than any tank. There is no point in having 10 million mm RHA armor on the front if a simple fpv drone can destroy your engine or track or penetrate your turret armor from above.

@actualyoungsoo 2 күн бұрын

Main Armament: 152 mm cannon Ammo capacity: 20

@tirsofelipeduranmendoza5432 3 күн бұрын

A assault tank... They try it one soviet times, now their willing to do it again. That T14 is not for a tank v tank, is more like a tank to destroy strongholds and trenches

@zollen123 2 күн бұрын

How many shells can it carry?

@sciencestudent88 4 күн бұрын

Very dramatic! Im not holding my breath for this…

@Hamzat22 3 күн бұрын

Yeah, another tank that will never see the battlefield. T-90 is the max Russia can produce in any amounts that can be sent to the front.

@QuicksilverVM 3 күн бұрын

@@Hamzat22 you dont know mutch about russian military Industrie. It has more capacity than all nato countrys together

@alexnderrrthewoke4479 3 күн бұрын

@@Hamzat22you guys said the same about t-80, t-90, t-90m but here they are. You will see armata too. Cope

@alexnderrrthewoke4479 3 күн бұрын

@@QuicksilverVMwell said 💯

@Hamzat22 3 күн бұрын

@@QuicksilverVM so after 10 years where is the Armata again? Where is the Terminator? In what numbers?

@fidel4023 3 күн бұрын

The Special Military Operation has proven that Tank to Tank battles are rare now and focusing on TankVTank capabilities is irrelevant. It looks like they are converting the purpose of T14 to being a mobile indirect fire solution that can also act as direct fire if needed (where'as artillery can only do indirect).

@rupjyotimekar6212 2 күн бұрын

120 and 125mm are still powerful guns. No need of heavy 130, 140 or 152mm on tanks.

@Jagi603 Күн бұрын

New gaiijin Russian premium bias

@revan22 8 сағат бұрын

So they're using the object 292 knowledge. It was about time they changed calibers. Occidental countries might push the 130/140mm cannons a bit more.

@marcinpl5643 2 күн бұрын

When you dont have technology, you have to just make it bigger🍔🗿

@TheGoodkilo Күн бұрын

I have like 35k WOT battles. I'm more than qualified to drive that

@michelpozo4656 2 күн бұрын

A very good weapon ! The on going war is a perfect training and allow to adapt capacities!

@ROSHing1 Күн бұрын

In order to reshape the battlefield they actually have to be able to build the things in significant numbers. They can't and they can be taken out with a drone that costs a few grand.

@coolcat498 3 күн бұрын

yet the unmanned turret is its weakness given the fact that it has little to no armor and a couple of drones or autocannon shots there can put it out of service pretty fast by taking out the breech or the carousel ammunition

@coolcat498 3 күн бұрын

and good luck repairing that lol

@drnick40 4 күн бұрын

A good idea but a $1000 drone with a RPG head strap to it will destroy it. What is the point of deploying it?

@kenwiltshire7834 4 күн бұрын

If it already has a system to destroy anti tank rockets, Shouldn't take much to use it against drones.

@rimeda1830 4 күн бұрын

@@kenwiltshire7834 problem is that it cant be used against drones its sad

@off6848 3 күн бұрын

@@rimeda1830 new cope cages for the t80bvm are being developed in Omsk we will probably see how well they increase survivability in this conflict soon. There's a few advantages Russian tanks have over western ones for drone survivability first off most Russian tanks actually have more top side armor than the average western tank (only 40mm) at the Abrams weakest. Secondly blow out panels for western tanks while they increase crew survivability actually have a draw back that the most simple drone can set off the blow out panels making even the weakest drones a one shot because after the panels blow the tank is compromised.

@rimeda1830 3 күн бұрын

@@drnick40 cope.cage helps, we only see tanks that are getting destoryed no one is showing tanks that survive.

@QuicksilverVM 3 күн бұрын

@@rimeda1830 you are just the only one who doesnt See that ^^ just today seen a footage of a t72bv who got Hit about 4 times by drones and drove over 2 meines and kept going . Another came back to Workshop for repair still burning fuel on it from the drone ^^ and there is a t90m wich was evacuated after 4 Hits by drone after that they tryed to destroy the tank with another 3 drones ,but couldnt

@hridoymahbub4793 3 күн бұрын

At last! However, I wish the Russia will install a 155mm cannon for duel SPH/direct-attack role

@smashu2 2 күн бұрын

When I started to play StarCraft I thought I could blitz with the siege tank than I realize those tank are played like armored artillery not assault tank...

@joshuarooney8614 3 күн бұрын

So they are goinf back to object 292 ? I would assume they have to because the new leopard is 140mm i think

@user-to5bb1st7w 16 сағат бұрын

Anti drone capabilities ✖️ BIGGER CANNONS ✔️✔️✔️ JAAA

@Hystericall 3 күн бұрын

You don't need a better gun, you need better all around armor to protect against ATGM and Suicide Drones.

@craigleighton1571 4 сағат бұрын

It will need a better ballistic computer first. As well as a better engine.

@muratilyassov9155 2 күн бұрын

the main feature - to be invisible on the battle field remains without changes😎🤔

@BB-gr9hq 2 күн бұрын

Russia has a 152mm and 203mm nuclear projectiles. Just something to keep in mind.

@tm2bow653 3 күн бұрын

But not mass produced yet. So even with a 300 mm gun : will it be mass produced one day? Or not?

@lianobarbosa8438 2 күн бұрын

That’s a heavy tank let take a look of course they did well on it and you can clearly do some updates outside too let wait for it !

@newbichote7178 21 сағат бұрын

280 rounds life spam 😢 that just low

@1bambiefawn 3 күн бұрын

A Cannon with a bigger hole making it easier for a drone to fly inside and explode 🎆

@scalion44y22 2 күн бұрын

Ah yes, because small explosive charges are going to damage the inside of a cannon barrel? Are you sure you understand how drone warfare is conducted? Or even how much it would take to damage the inside of a cannon barrel?

@morrisdyer9560 20 сағат бұрын

Are you scared. I think that they should go live war proofing.

@TacticalFumo-sg2dt 3 күн бұрын

What is this video? Some AI thing? Are we in 2019 again? There is no T-14 Armata, the project is cancelled. The 152mm cannon was cancelled even before that.

@Russiaalwayswins 2 күн бұрын

Realy ?...))

@TacticalFumo-sg2dt 2 күн бұрын

@@Russiaalwayswins Yes. In March 2024 head of Rostec, Sergey Chemezov, said that there will not be adoption of T-14 by the Russian Army. Google that if you don't believe me. It's too expensive, not suited for mass production, not suited for battlefield in its current form and requires further development. Again - google it if you don't believe me.

@user-wr5mn6cp2u Күн бұрын

I recognized you. You are the Russian Minister of Defense))

@sale3151 Күн бұрын

Russia is working on Armata and original plan for Armata is to have 152 mm gun

@TacticalFumo-sg2dt Күн бұрын

For some reason my previous reply was deleted. Head of Rostec said that Armata will not be adopted. Google the news from March this year.

@gyulanyars6636 3 күн бұрын

"Big gun Big gun, number one Big gun Big gun kick the hell out of you." Sure.😀😀😀

@Felipe-km8ut 4 күн бұрын

Modified to fire bigger diameter ATGM

@axlfrhalo 3 күн бұрын

i looooooooooooooove AI voiceoever, said no one ever

@hanswurst3394 3 күн бұрын

Im sure the tank will get an upgrade to maybe a 280 mm caliber soon.

@aidanmacdougall9250 4 күн бұрын

A great tank, shame about fpv drones though! 😕

@randym7961 3 күн бұрын

What is a great tank? Not the t-14 it is so bad they never even thought about building a production line for it.. IE russia can't build them unless it wants to build a few more by hand lolol

@ASpyNamedJames 3 күн бұрын

@@randym7961 Another one of those comments that will look good in the collection of "stuff Muricans say". Right up there with "The Rafale will never sell" and "The F35 is going to be peerless".

@randym7961 3 күн бұрын

@@ASpyNamedJames Hard for you to argue with truth and facts

@user-ty2pk9om8c 3 күн бұрын

Вы не правы

@buzzmeanytime Күн бұрын

Putin is starting to care about his tank crews

@Fuyuki1922 3 күн бұрын

As far as I remember, his project was canceled

@preludeh22a57 2 күн бұрын

As far as I remember it never was

@Fuyuki1922 Күн бұрын

This is because it was recently, the russian government did say that because the T-14 armata is extremely expensive@@preludeh22a57

@ddvrt4046 Күн бұрын

Armata is too expensive for flgths of high intensity war !

@januszparol1986 3 күн бұрын

Cool, I wonder if the turret's gonna look like the 3D-printable file available from one site.

@user-xx3fb9ep4y 17 сағат бұрын

Modern version of the OBJ 292

@talesoftheamericanempire 4 күн бұрын

They can't put a 152mm gun on a turret unless the vehicle is much, much bigger. Too much recoil and weight. But they can get rid of the turret, so its more like a SP gun.

@Dazzxp 3 күн бұрын

The T-14 was originally built around the 152mm, but then opted for the more common 125mm because the ammunition was more readily available. With NATO now opting for 130-140mm i guess Russia has decided to go down the 152mm. It's more of a dick measuring contest. However I should note that Russian tanks do have the capability to be used in indirect fire support roles also been this case since the T55 so they are dual use.

@off6848 3 күн бұрын

@@Dazzxp I don't think its as simple as a d measuring contest. The ability to fire krasnopol guided rounds from an mbt is an insane advantage. The new 130-140mm guns from the west are a brand new project and the excalibur guided munitation already in production are 155mm. Also thermobaric shells is crazy. A thermobaric autoloader mbt is a hell of a fire support weapon for infantry.

@user-dl3nc4jx7k 3 күн бұрын

you don't know the story, the 152 mm cannon was already put on working prototypes of Soviet tanks before the collapse of the USSR, and there were 2 or 3 of these prototypes, and the cannon was quite firing, there was a problem with the survivability of the gun barrel then the cannon fired 200 shots and required replacement

@3PICBA77L35 3 күн бұрын

no you dont,why? simple object 292,the T-80 platform was the first tank to incorporate the 152mm with 0 issues,only needed some counter weight on the back of the turret and a more solid cast steel gun mount and a improved recoil system

@Wassup309 2 күн бұрын

Deadly weapon

@Grionlam Күн бұрын

It's simplly too expensive, limited in number and hard to maintain, this war has been prove that the more complicated the Mbts the sooner it destroyed. Happen on both side

@ds8106able 3 күн бұрын

It will decrease the flexibility and the range of the tank. It doesn´t make sense.

@terr0rbyte-yi2kv 3 күн бұрын

as much as i would like for it to be something new a plausible thing, its probably filled with a lot of flaws,

@baronelazarev1729 3 күн бұрын

The Ukraine War give Russia so much information for future development of their equipment. We wouldn't know that cheap drone will easily destroy a Tank and armored vehicle before this War. Experience is the best teacher...

@M1984FA 2 күн бұрын

I am sure it is a great gadget, but how does it compare with 500 ruble suicide drone?

@Sullivanfrederick-r3d 2 күн бұрын

Even though they don't need.

@chrismair8161 Күн бұрын

At that Caliber it is a Two piece round to load and fire. Rate of fire goes way down and accuracy is a No Show. Good Job making an Artillery gun a complete joke.

@Come_take_em 4 сағат бұрын

T-14 unicorns 🦄

@fgbv3139 Күн бұрын

Let the drones handle it.

@viorelpiscanu9425 3 күн бұрын

Well, hard to say this new model will be a game changer in Ukraine war... Very few T14 tanks were sent there...

@godzed123 2 күн бұрын

How high armata tank turret can fly?

@Commie-San Күн бұрын

Maybe the same as Abrams in Iraq war considering it's weight

@godzed123 Күн бұрын

@@Commie-San how many Russians tank have been destroyed in Ukraine? They can't even deployed their latest tank, afraid to be captured. 😞

@Commie-San Күн бұрын

@@godzed123 according to kiev Russia has lost 10,000. While oryx and some military int'l US and UK claims around 3,000 - 4,000 considering Russia has produced more and deployed more than Ukraine and US sent to the battlefield... Btw just a response to your last 2 sentence.. why did USA still can't deploy their latest AbramsX and their promised "game-changer" F-16s yet? Afraid to be captured too??

@godzed123 Күн бұрын

@@Commie-San why would u.s sent the latest? That's not their fight. Ask the Russians why they can't send their latest tank and fighter jet, its been yrs.

@Commie-San 22 сағат бұрын

@@godzed123 35 countries vs 1 Russia still they couldn't stop the easy-mode Russia with shovels despite being given their most modern weapons and billion dollars... It's been a year you're right USA has promised us those weapons will turn the tide in this war Also, You said it, "It's not their fight" so what the hell USA and the westards been doing there?

@winstonsmith7801 3 күн бұрын

Without full drone protection , it's weak.

@akula9713 4 күн бұрын

Won’t test it in Ukraine? It’s either kept back for a shock to a future NATO conflict or it’s a disappointment?

@temong0long054 4 күн бұрын

Yah probably. They keep them back like ukraine keeping back most of their western tanks fearing media.

@Leelan1250 4 күн бұрын

Why would they send their most expensive tank to Ukraine with the possibility of being captured?

@hellgates_javed6451 4 күн бұрын

Lmao so you think it's only these two possibilities l?

@alfredchurchill2328 3 күн бұрын

@@Leelan1250 probably because the t14 doesn’t actually exist as a production model tank. They can’t get it to work still. So it’s not even in production. So no, it’ll not go to Ukraine. Or maybe it will 10 years from now when Russia is trying to enter Kharkiv….on its border 😂

@leight420 3 күн бұрын

@@alfredchurchill2328haha sure buddy keep telling yourself it doesnt exist when you can see it on video🤣🤣 how delusional can you be? so embarrassing!

@user-vj6dc8le8h Күн бұрын

Боезапас меньше гораздо будет. Приличный минус..🤔

@user-wr5mn6cp2u Күн бұрын

От плять, Генштаб-то даже не догадывается!

@andread5560 Күн бұрын

Very usefull expecially on a tank withbacproduction of ZERO tanks a month

@milutinke 3 күн бұрын

The Armata needs anti-drone hard kill system and a drone jammer, forget about the cannon, the turret armor is ordinary metal plates without any serious thickness

@Max_Da_G 3 күн бұрын

It has a hard-kill APS. Afganit it's called. No reason why Russians can't tune it to kill drones too.

@milutinke 3 күн бұрын

@@Max_Da_G The launchers are configured in a way that they can't hit drones.

@schizophrenic4208 Күн бұрын

If tank snitch did not give the book to us but now flow's are known

@user-ir8zk7kg2j 2 күн бұрын

Смысл от нее, если развалят дронами и потратят 10000 долларов против миллионов

@mikoajkeler1042 3 сағат бұрын

since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, not a single such tank has been seen on the battlefield, Russia has been cut off from important components needed to produce this vehicle, so a larger gun will not change anything , a similar situation is with the BTR 4, it does not matter what vehicles Russia puts into battle because they are destroyed on reaching the battlefield

@ivan200804 3 күн бұрын

Ok, lets not go crazy. Just because you mount 152mm does not mean you can "reshape the battlefield." 152mm means less ammo though. M1 is a beast and it was easily destroyed by a simple drone. Make no mistake, M1 is a beast, but things has changed.