Thank you. I've always liked the way you've shared unedited images. That helps me better understand what the film really looks like.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching 😊
@RubberKid10018 күн бұрын
I've been shooting this stock rated at ISO 400, without push processing it, and the negatives are still plenty dense. Add to that the fact that Kamerastore tend to spool a little extra (I recently got 49 shots out of a roll), and the fact that they had a significant sale going on for this film in July (€10 inc. tax) and I think this is my favourite film to use at 400 ISO. The scans may take a little more contrast correction if you shot them in unfavourable lighting, but they're still very good.
@idasu Жыл бұрын
Your photos always make me emotional ! Especially 9:03
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@ArchiesLens Жыл бұрын
Awe I love Emily! She’s a friend of mine. Her colorful style is indeed so great to show off this film. Great video and in depth dive into this film. ✨
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
She’s great, I enjoyed working with her!!
@ArchiesLens Жыл бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam that's so awesome! love the images you captured❣
@35matinee3 ай бұрын
The information in quote marks is wrong! "Color reversal" is SLIDE film. This, obviously, is a negative film. Love the comparison.. Good topic.
@wearetrackclub Жыл бұрын
Great shots! Really interesting to hear your thoughts and process 👍
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching :)
@Edvanfleury Жыл бұрын
your content and review is so delightful to watch
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@BooDooPerson7 ай бұрын
as an Aerocolor-defender, and like you someone who doesn't shoot 100 speed very often, it's worth noting this stuff does push very well at least up to 400 if you're doing your own development. The contrast at 400 is much closer to where you'd want it, though it still helps to boost the saturation a bit. The datasheet you were reading from has Kodak's recommended push timing for this film in C-41 chems.
@tongchar Жыл бұрын
Very cool look of the scans. I recently tried the medium format of aerocolor in studio portrait, it turn out pretty good too.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
I also have some medium format vision of this film, I’m going to try it as well~
@user-wt3ft7fu4k7 ай бұрын
They sold an ad to someone talking about a dead kid. Happy video + dead kid story = bad time
@jamesjuranke Жыл бұрын
Nice one Sam! Thanks for sharing and going into depth into this film! Keep doing all the amazing work that your doing!
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you for watching :)
@jamesjuranke Жыл бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam 🖤
@confrontingphotography48159 ай бұрын
I’ve shot 4 rolls (2 x 35 and 2 x MF) of this film and I love it. I agree that there is a lot of magenta in it which makes color correction a little difficult even using silverfast., it actual shows more magenta with less exposure than it does with more exposure. I am going to shoot some chip charts on my next roll to get a baseline. I agree that it can be pushed around a lot in camera and post, so I love its flexibility. The grain and contrast are delicious. Other companies selling this stock include Popho, Cat Labs, and Flick Film.
@itscapturedbysam9 ай бұрын
I haven’t try the 120 format of this film yet, looking forward to try it out~
@confrontingphotography48159 ай бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam I scanned my 120 from Catlabs and it looks amazing. I'm posting my own video on it in the next couple of weeks. Put a roll through your P67 and see if you don't love it.
@jebeq2007 Жыл бұрын
I think that a lot of what you are saying about the film having a vintage look with a green cast has to do with your scanner and Negative Lab Pro not knowing how to handle this film. I have been shooting the Flic film Elektra 100 of Aerocolor and I really like it. I got my film developed and scanned at Gelatin Labs and got some great results from it. It has very fine grain and shows a lot of detail and I also like the colors from it. Also the Flic Film Elektra 100 is a little cheaper than the Reflx film
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
There are a lot of this film out there in different re-brand for sure, and I think it’s awesome the labs keeps this film going. I’ve seen some other sample photos from this film and I think when I edit it I may unconsciously make this look “more vintage” 😅
@areallyrealisticguyd433310 ай бұрын
fun fact you can cross process this film in E6 to get really nice slides! Just a disclaimer though without filters it will kind of look like tungsten film so you might want to get some heavy warming filters
@itscapturedbysam10 ай бұрын
Yeah I've seen photos thats cross processed... I don't love the look, but for science we could always try it~ lol
@sentimental7167 Жыл бұрын
Interesting colors, thanks for sharing also the unedited shots! Reminded me of Agfa RSX or some East German film (Wolfen?)… and I find you can bring out the more sensitive side of a person in your portraits 👌.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
From my understanding there are a lot of lab remade films from Aerocolor or some kind of Aerocolor film, like the Santa color, and maybe the Wolfen too~
@sentimental7167 Жыл бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam I see… not so easy to come by here in Germany 🤷♂️
@Rezail_Uhhh Жыл бұрын
Great video, however my neighbor declined my offer.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
LoL time to hack in their computer 🤓
@filmiclove Жыл бұрын
bastante contraste destruye todo.
@milesian1 Жыл бұрын
I'm glad this video showed up in my recommendations. You have a very nice presentation style, and shared a lot of information in an engaging way. This film doesn't really appeal to me based on what you shared. The Kodak Gold shots, however, were really lovely and to my taste. BTW, 妳是台灣人嗎?妳講英文的樣子很像我的一些台灣朋友們。
I don’t use photoshop I prefer to send them to The Darkroom Lab to get the original results.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
A lot of people don’t, color can turn out differently depending on how you scan it and how your edit it for sure.
@tuomopoika Жыл бұрын
I wonder if this is the same stock as in SatalColor 100. It is also spooled from some Kodak aerial film.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
There might be different type of Aerial film, but I think SantaColor is also some kind of Kodak Aerocolor~
@rossandhisjpegs Жыл бұрын
big fan
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Thank you~
@Sam-em1ic Жыл бұрын
Definitely has a look but to me I’m not that into it. I think when people use things like Kodak gold now it’s like it’s a “vintage look” because of the golden hour leaning tones, but it’s actually not really, it’s more like a stylised perfect modern version of the idea of vintage, whereas this is kind of a truer representation of that era which in reality when you look through the majority of old photos (at least excluding the very vivid slide films like Kodachrome) tended to be kind of flat and muddy looking for the most part
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
I haven’t shot a lot Kodak gold in 35mm, but I shot quite a lot gold in 120, to me gold 120 has a much cleaner base color, less color shifting… I think the way I scan and edit this film or any film could make the film look different from its “original color”, that’s why I prefer using easier films that fit my work flow~ (I don’t know if what I’m saying make sense 😅)
@Sam-em1ic Жыл бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam yes, it does make sense. In other words it’s an accurate, predictable and high quality film stock, whereas this one is… something haha
@Sam-em1ic Жыл бұрын
@@itscapturedbysam do you have an Instagram? I would like to follow it, I love the range of your work it’s really cool
@addinihza Жыл бұрын
whats scanner do you used? its noritsu or frontier? thank you
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
Epson V850
@doozledumbler5393 Жыл бұрын
There is no new film.
@itscapturedbysam Жыл бұрын
There are not much old films either.... cry.jpg
@2071photo Жыл бұрын
The second roll looks so good, I think I’ll still use negative lab pro 🫣 excited to give it a try though 🥳