Only really makes sense if the property is abandoned for years and the squatter is maintaining it. Further the squatter has to be clear and obvious about their possession, in this case it's just a bunch of degenerates house-squatting.

Really puts into perspective the way Democrats think. They don't respect your most basic rights and they want everything you have ever worked for. They think they are so progressive but in reality they are a mirror image of every group of bigotted villains ever and their fate will be no different than that of the Third Reich but it will take people standing up for themselves.

Get a big guard dog.

Hippity hoppity your house is now our property.

Imagine someone doing this and having access to guns that were kept in the home.

We are just as appalled. This is the first time I’m hearing of this law and my faith in the government just found a shovel and started digging.

it doesnt exist outside usa bcuz its stupid. also this happens when every state has its law.

thanks biden

Its called fgn liberals. 😂

​@FrostByteVoyager protecting a tenant who signed a lease and paid money is completely different than protecting some person who broke into your house and is living in it, or one who stopped paying their rent months ago and is living there free. A landlord still has taxes, insurance, and possibly a mortgage to pay, they need some level of income to cover that. It's a BS law that doesn't help actual renters or landlords.

hell yeah

Cant live in your house if you're in prison for murder either, sadly.

@thegoodrevbadandyarr4272 cant go prison if they dont catch you

Do you not see this is exactly what the CIA wants

​@@thegoodrevbadandyarr4272true but if people want to play stupid games 😃

I remember that quote from a documentary I watched I can't remember where ....the Palestine stuff I think 😂it's crazy world right now 😢

It wasnt her home tho so no it isnt the same thing

​@@oltimos8888Who's home is it then she had the deed

They cant walk into your house if their knee caps are magically missing off property.

Exactly. People are so naive to call police. Bloody snitches. Learn to make friends then train together and make an oath to protect each other from such practices. I will say it suck’s it has come to this.

Sounds like solid plan

Step 4: dream about your house while in prison.

@@smilie-pm9gbNo witnesses.

What’s even worse is when people don’t know the difference between worse and worst.

so what moron thought of that "system" to begin with and why was it made a law. Unbelievable. Truly Ideocracy at display.

@@benjaminghazi787 you're a baiter

Bill has been filed in NY to prevent squatter to have rights, hope it gets nationwide

​@@benjaminghazi787 "Minor grammatical error, I win."

That’s true too in Spain, I guess the goverment wants to incentivate immigration to get more taxes to pay pensions.

Same in Spain i think. As a Swede I've heard alot of issues that people from Spain scouat imigrants houses when they are away for a week or two to handle bussnies with families and stuff in their home countries.... Its insane .

you tell me there is a good chance for me to own a house in paris?

​@@reimagineuniversewhen are we doing this ....😂? Seems like this shit legit ..what a dumbass world we live in

J'avais pas vu qu'il y avait quelqu'un qui avait fait un commentaire similaire. Mais oui, c'est n'importe quoi, et en plus toutes les dégradations, tu dois les payer, c'est fou

Lol then it's not worse. America does NOT have that. Some states give you absolutely no option but to suffer and endure what they do to you and your residence.

I can't believe some people disagree with this.

people have argued when it's a derelict house that the owners have left to rot for several years then it should be okay but 30 days is way too short for squatter rights to kick in

They should be dragged out of the house and jailed

I'm so confused, what the hell are Squatters?! According to Google, the definition is "a person who unlawfully occupies an uninhabited building or unused land". UNLAWFULLY, how is this a discussion? Dear USA, do you need brains or a revolution?

This is a law from ancient times when people sometimes went hunting or whatever and died. Their homes were therefore left vacant and anybody that came along could take over the home. After certain number of time had passed, the home eventually was the squatter's house. We freaking live in the modern times and such idiotic law needs to be repealed all over the country.

Before the authorities do anything at all, they should simply be required to check for proof from the 'renters' (squatters) that they have been paying rent, and have a signed, legal rent agreement. If they can't do that, they are literally trespassers, and not 'renters'. You can't evict trespassers, you simply remove them, immediately. F***ing NY, lol!

I bet you can’t just squat in a cops or judges house, because that would be a trespassing immediately, but with regular people it’s pfffft😂

​@@ivandankob7112if you "let them" then they become a tenant.

You'd swear by now they'd realise voting democrat is a bad idea unless you're a criminal.

Blue city

Yeah in Egypt as well I guess it’s less than 20 maybe don’t know but it’s definitely not a month and doesn’t give them the ability to get you arrested for changing the locks while they force their way into your home that’s nuts

Italiano?

that’s fucked up, also FJB.

What's crazy is that NY residents will keep on voting for the party that cause situations like these,

Yeah, that is the real NY experience for you.

She was also sexually assaulted

@@si-jd9oq The alternative is the criminal organization who just had their head honcho outed as a fraudster concening what they "own".

You do know, that some people are more equal than you? You'd be toast in a second if you do that.

If the house was empty for a couple of years.. maybe, not sure how it works.. it's still dumb, But having empty houses is also

@@thescatterpiratesquarepant7935 Not really, like in this case sometimes a loved one passes and it takes time to sell the house

They use the fact that noone has been living in an empty house and after a month or so they claim squatters rights and shows some payment receipt they ordered for the house as "proof" that they live there.

@@thescatterpiratesquarepant7935 There won't be any empty houses for long.. The illegal invaders are instructing hordes of other illegal invaders to do this very thing. We already know they are above the law and treated as first class vip "citizens" with everything else... Our "justice" system will not remove them from the stolen homes. I guarantee it and it's not just empty houses, waiting to be sold... It's people on vacation! Come home to cannibals that have stolen their home and above the law..

how will they know?

I’m pretty sure the owners wouldn’t get arrested, but, if they did, they wouldn’t get charged.

Because these laws existed back before digital documentation when people would die or go missing with no relatives in the area and properties were left vacant. So either someone would claim the property or the town or state would take possession of it.

It was intended for people who had inhabited a destroyed/abandoned property, and began restoring it. Illegal migrants who have been elevated above the law by the NY mayor don't restore the buildings they inhabit

Because Democrats are a pro crime party

@@FishAnvil invented for people in wastelands

@@Lobsterwithinternet emotions + a gap in the market = money. If squatters are virtually "immune" to the law, who knows when someone would get big brain time and hire a fellow squatter to play "Hitman Contracts" with the other squatters.

Probably easier to steal a person's home in NY than own a firearm.

As an american i do wanna confirm that its not like this in every state, and squatters right does not exist in most states, and it certainly does not exist in mine. New york's homeless situation is just horrible in general.

@@tmoney1487 Squatters rights exist in every state, but the laws were never designed to do this.

@@LadyRubyEye and lawmakers are too damn slow to respond, it took them more than a decade to just now start acting against gambling in videogames, and even that isn't finished yet.

@@tmoney1487 I can confirm that squatters rights do in fact exist in every single state. They are listed under "adverse possession" If you google "Adverse posession laws [State's Name]" you'll find them. I think it's in all US territories as well, but I'm less sure on that since some places like American Samoa kind of do their own thing.

What an idiotic comment, the duration of squats has nothing to do with validity of ownership.

@@Discovery2024-rn8kn It has everything to do with the validity of ownership? Do you understand what squatters claims even are?

yeah I would understand for it to be a very long period of time but anything less than 2 years imo is just stupidity at its finest

@@shadowd9810 Yeah not having a sense of care for literally anyone that owns but doesn't use X is very stupid. But there should be some time period in which these things can be legally handed to someone else. We don't have infinite room on the planet, and every building company is private, so tough chance all those empty fields will turn into more housing. AND This economy (worldwide) doesn't allow for so much borderline homelessness, because that's how you crash econemies.

@@Discovery2024-rn8kn Legit can go away for a holiday in the US democrat state and people own your home after breaking in that how short the time.

>Imagine going on vacation for 30 days I wish

@@SarkkothImagine to not even have a union to guarantee 6 weeks of vacation a year at the bare minimum. ;-)

Just bring a friendly group of pals at night and politely ask them to leave

@@Traumglanz unions only exist to elect democrats, everything else is just pr and even with guaranteed vacation days per year most work places do not like/allow you to take more than 2 weeks consecutively

@@Sarkkoth Americans get like three days a year of paid days off and I still laugh at how they think it's the greatest country on earth LOL!

That's great news, what do I google exactly to read about this?

Not all of the squatters left

@@TommyBoyB"new york post woman loses her house to squatters"

Laws become useless scraps of paper when they do not work to benefit people.

@@TommyBoyBlook it up lol durdadurr

that's california. not even joking

Because you have investors sitting on property for years fucking over everyone while there's a housing crisis just watching their property go up in value along with or even more than inflation. While I don't necessarily disagree with allowing squatters to take over after a period of time, 30 days is a sick joke. 2 years should be the bare minimum.

It was originally to prevent landlords from suddenly tossing out tenants without just cause or proper procedure, but scumbags will find a way to exploit any law. The rich do it with taxes forcing the lower-middle class to pay more, the lazy & dirty do it with our homes, causing us a slew of problems. America is fucking stupid.

When I first found out about squatters rights I looked into it. Apparently it's old laws from before everything was digital, and back then people would just disappear without a trace sometimes. When that was the case you would want laws that made it legal to reclaim this unused land, as otherwise larger and larger parts of a country would just become unused.

@@Luckyyshot- It can still be an issue even today - sometimes land is just outright abandoned, and most states give landowners a reasonable term of 10 to 15 years to get rid of the squatters before they actually lose the property. Just pop by once every two or three years to make sure nobody's openly living on it, and you can keep your land. This is especially true for hedge funds and speculators that buy and sell land without ever looking at it - it could end up being lost to squatters if they never actually send someone to take a look at it, but even then it has to go on for more than a decade before the land is actually lost.

They the same ones going after Trump

👆 this, most ot the people here are missing this point. If he cannot provide documents of a tenancy or lease agreement from him towards the landlord then in what world is he illegally being evicted if he is illegally staying there... The police just don't make sense here...

He could also just print out fake papers and make the process longer then usual.

The whole thing is stupid. A few years ago I went down a huge rabbit hole as this stuff interested me. The lady is well within her right to evict them. But there is an extremely long drawn out system that she has to follow that's linked to human rights. Please check for me as I'm not American. But as far as I'm aware all states follow very similar rules. Meaning Texas have it just as bad as everyone else. (Castle law doesn't apply to a place you don't live at day to day.)

@@Vandassar I've heard states can vary wildly in laws.

*politicians. Average citizens certainly do not vote for this

@queuebe4068 oh i 100 percent agree. Politicians and corporations have completely detailed America as a whole.

That amusement park one would be fucking hilarious.

@@queuebe4068 Of course they do. The average citizen will vote for anything, but won't care until it affects them. Just give it a shiny name and put the correct party affiliation next to it. Boom. Voted for. It's that easy.

@@Awakened_Mucacha Well until Disney just killed you and disposed of your body and told anyone looking for you that they'd never seen you, lol.

Funny it works. and step 3 is getting the owner arrested.

@@3sgamestudio Make the owner more mad and extend his unjust sentence.. that's evil.

That is quite literally the grift. It's extortion. It must be difficult to charge on extortion because of the squatter rights bs.

Israel 😂

what do u mean??? Most americans are pro-zionists.... this sort of house stealing should be encourage! This is what is happening to palestinians everyday LOL

It was always Get Woke Go Broke. Dont know why everyone started saying Go for both parts.

@@thepsychomagus gowokegobroke sounds better

Haha that’s what I was thinking

People from bumfuck nowhere don’t know the first thing about real estate lol 😂

Its probably the property value, and everything in NY is expensive asf. Hate to see how much a mansion cost😮

Any house with more than 1 floor in NY cost more than a million yes, it's not new :p

It's not that bad. Where I'm from, with a million dollars, you get a singular small room with around 5 squared meters of kitchen and bathroom.

Nah, King of the Hill

@@CharaGonzalez-lt7yw King of the hill royal💀

@@Hamael_Surk King of the nightmares: NYC

We've got them in my country but it's 20 years and it does become ours

Brazil?

@@PauloZionlight sim

That's is this current presidential administrations plan.

The people enacting these laws are literally just communists. It is technically illegal for them to hold any power in America, but leftists only enforce laws selectively against their political and cultural enemies in America.

OMG that judge is horrible. What a waste of money then to the real owner of the house, its not fair. And those squaters knows it very well what they did, disgusting!

Source: My friends cousins friend told me

I'm from Venezuela and that is true, I once visited the beach house of a friend and he explained how he hires a local to watch over it so some family doesn't just enter and start living there

completely explains why the neighbor doesn't walk onto the property to address an issue. Careful not to cross the line

The whole issue here seems to be that they have to prove whether or not a lease agreement exist. Police cant do that. Thats why its a court case

However, if you trespass for 30 days without getting caught, you now have squatter's rights in New York! Hurrah! Democrat policies!

They do have a lease agreement - its just fake. Short story, somebody else has hoodwinked them (it only requires a printer). The problem is that the cops don't do civil matters; the courts need to make the decision on the validity of the lease agreement. It is usually very quick once you get into court, but the courts are rammed and can take years to get a date. The solution is to require lease agreements to be registered with an authority under witness from the owner (who will have documentation). Then, no registered lease, out you go (probably to jail).

The problem is you can goto the library, go online and print out a lease. Those people have fake leases to fool the cops

Martha's Vineyard must open its homes to diversity. They NEED to be enriched.

(Edited), it's a shitty law and NYC is clown central. Upstate New Yorkers outside of the city are way more sensible than this

@@762x69 Somewhere I read that the owner was actually paying for the utility, not the squatters.

@@dark3031 that's nucking futs. In my state that wouldn't fly, especially with my local sheriff's department. They probably would be like, are you armed?? Lmao

thats the thing. the squatter didnt had a legal documetnation of renting the place. according to the news outlet that asked and what he showed them. meaning shes going to jail for a set of documents that doesnt hold legality whatsoever. meanwile she has every documentation of ownership and has no papers of renting out the property

Actually it's Democrat States in 2024. Democrats love to allow theft and illegal immigrants. They're the party of Crime.

@@id2k. More like... The United States. This is what our country is now, voting does nothing when both sides want you divided and dumb.

@@eTheBlack Yeah but Biden sniffs little kids, so.

@@id2k. "Bidens America" is the new "Thanks Obama".

@@id2k. He's right about it though. This isn't a Trump or Biden issue, this has been going on since long before they even took office.

and they are released next day with no bail. they were ordered to wear GPS monitors and surrender their passports. Thats it. Im not kidding, look it up. This is what happens when a "certain" party is given free reign with no consequences.

yup and they are released on bail next day. not even kidding look it up, GPS monitor and had to surrender passports thats it (2) (youtube autodelete)

is that the one with the illegal?

Sounds like one of the calmest crimes ever committed in that God forsaken place.

@@iona2225 yup and they are released on "" next day. not even kidding look it up, GPS monitor and had to surrender passports... thats all their punishment is. (3)(youtube autodelete)

I mean if you're paying for the lights water heating etc maintaining it, why shouldn't it be yours

@@SpaceElvisInc Because it is not yours to begin with? Like if you go on a vacation and somebody steals your car, but pays for fuel, does he now own your car? What kind of idiot are you?

@@SpaceElvisInc cause you didnt fucking buy the house, but someone else did

@@SpaceElvisIncsquatters don’t usually pay for those thing they just live in a house with nothing bunch of loser.

​@@SpaceElvisIncthey don't pay, the owner has to pay

FJB!!!!

Certainly becoming more and more fantasy dystopic.

Lets be honest. It's a 3rd world country in a nice suit.

In my country the squatter's right kicks in at 12 YEARS. Basically suppose someone dies in a remote area, and there is no next of kin, etc. then anyone can possess the property and start to maintain it. 30 days? WTF is that timeline? You leave your home for a business trip and come back to a deadbeat criminal using your stuff?

@@mrsamuel5572 what is fjb

sorry for ur loss man, some evil ppl in this world

Bro thats so sad Hope ur are doing okay Bless u and her soul

​@@iabuseartemis Plenty of evil people but what bothers me as much is useless laws and government institutions that take tax money and do nothing for good citizens who actually pay taxes...

Jesus fucking Christ…

That sure happened.

It ain’t worth buying a house in New York man, 1 million dollars for that.

Was looking for this comment 😂

cities are super inflated, mosts costs for houses are memetic, because people think its cool to live in nyc, sf, or la, its not, these places are godawful

ya i built a house of similar size before and it cost around 70k in materials, even less before when wood was cheap. remember this before ever buying a house near a city

This is a 50k house in Eastern Europe and 200k in western Europe tops LOL

And then you’re indebted to the mob thereafter. Not a very viable alternative.

Hi there Gastsu... that's a crime called "conspiracy murder" in this country.

And then you’re indebted to the mob thereafter. Not a viable alternative.

@@henrychurch6062 In his defense, fucking strangers were in his house and the offical forces told him to go fuck himself

And then you’re indebted to the mob afterwards. Not exactly a viable alternative.

And if you send a ticket to recover the account and change the password, you get IP blocked.

True if by account you mean the biggest piece of inheritance handed to you by your immediate ancestors or property you put a lifes' work into buying yourself.

Funny you say that as just over a month is how long Discord support takes to respond to a hacked account ticket.

I have been gone from my house over 30 days so many times

@@BaghNakh1 “IP banned”

If someone doesn't want to leave your house they're now a tenant.

@@Quintessence4444 Breaking & entering and trespassing. Theyre not a tenant, theyre a felon

Because they showed a phony lease agreement. Then it goes to the civil court, which is the 2 year bogged down.

Because police are not omnipresent and don't have all the information. so they try to kick everything up to the courts. That said the NY legal system isn't okay. The other day a bunch of people who were arrested for having human limbs in their freezer and pipes filled with blood of the two bodies they found...all were released without bail. all of disappeared.

No, the NY legal system is not okay. It is horribe as hell.....

3 mill in Toronto 😂

Right?! I was legit expecting a mansion.

@@highheatrichie yup. 2.6 mil in vancouver lol

Depends on the state, since it has like no yard... it would be 100-120k tops here.

Do it’s wrong to allow your assets to accumulate value?

Sure, but that kind of extortion is not illegal. Just like it's not a crime to threaten people, if you are threatening them with legal action.

Or after the police left. A couple individuals returned and 'made' sure the squatter would leave and he did.😂

@@kethmarhkfy7luf.263 Did you watch the video? She wasn't getting paid any lease money, and she was the only legal owner of the building. Maybe he was paying "lease" money to the local gang. Not her shit to deal with.

That's when you go outside the law and hire some nasty people that will threaten to do nasty things to the squatter

@@ericbyo9472why the squatters? Not the stupid boomer morons making these stupid laws and enforcing them? Seems like a system problem rather than the people taking advantage. It’s time to purge the system truthfully

@@Radbiker33357Why not both?

​@@ericbyo9472that would've been my first option, not the cops. Haha It'd probably cost a fraction of whatever that court is gonna charge.

It may take take that long, but hopefully she could sue the guy for all he's worth, which isn't much, and maybe even get him thrown in jail.

God damn it's such a good franchise.

Because politicians want criminal votes.

@@StarHunter28 "was" F

What does 'la li lu le lo' mean?

Well, they need the votes of squatters and criminals.

skill issue

She can’t lawyer up and win, the squatter gets a free lawyer and the process can drag on average of 2 years, this can run up a big bill on the victim. Also the legit owner has to pay for the utilities otherwise run the risk of being sued. Only real answer here is vigilante justice

Get millions from whom? Squatters? City? She isn't getting anything if anything she will be fined.

​@@Saberdudimagine they did this to an unstable persone and got themselves killed. For fucking around too much. This is so fucking weird. I would just hire a criminal if shit dont get better. Wth.

Unfortunately this only goes two ways either the Lady pays the squatter whatever he wants. Or she gives him the house. In NYC it's impossible to beat a squatter.

So bring a silencer?

Hate to say it but the he mafia once thrived because the law was that garbage… Won’t be surprised if the shady figures rise up again

Yup they can't say I'm renting if you say it was self defense....

Bring a friend.

Glad I'm in a stand your ground state. Instead of the cops we call a cleaning company.

That's why you do this to the ones with lobbying power but that's going to take squatters squatting against their own self interest...

Exactly

All laws are.

Yeah and that's how soy new yorkers become, really sad.. 😂

you can always vote accordingly but no people are dumb so they suffer.

To prevent future lawsuits 😊😊😊

They always blur criminals faces, they value them more than their own citizens.

because its new york and they would be charged for showing the scumbags face lol. Failed state

legal reasons they got the right to broadcast the homeowners face but they did not get the rights to the other people.

​@@flyingfish7787They absolutely don't do it for that reason. Why didn't they blur the Covington kid's face, or the face of the nine year old Redskins fan? They are POLITICAL ACTIVISTS, not journalists.

Yeah, the problem is that the lady doesnt live there. So its not her home, its just her property. Leftist dont care about property rights.

Actually, its seizing property. Breaking into something implies that you intend to leave.

Breaking has a different intention. Seizure is another

@@powerflumi 🤓👆

So it's vandalism, breaking and entering, and theft.

Going from fighting supervillains to beating up squatters sounds kinda low, though. What would be that Batman's tragic backstory - "Squatters stole the Wayne Manor from my parents"?

You need the whole crew from Marvel & DC

@@user-df4kf6fg7hthat's the problem with reality though, you can't make this shit up

landlords would be a thing of the past then.

NY needs a Batman without his “moral code” to deal with this sht

Asmongold = Tyler Durden from Fight Club, at least for the consumerism part lmao

Squaters would not be able to take his house because he never leaves his room XD

😂

Asmon is the squatter himself kappa

Oh no, I would definitely live in Asmon's house, just not while he is living there.

In blue areas yes.

@@id2k."I am a democrat and I believe all republicans are idiots" "I am a republican and I believe all democrats are idiots"

@@id2k.- "The courts move too slow" is an EVEN WORSE PROBLEM in red states, where innocent people can have their entire lives destroyed because the courts won't listen to an innocent man's pleas to take a closer look at the evidence or to secure something that proves his innocence. That landowner still had a car and a job, and her freedom - which is a hell of a lot more than the victims of red state bullshit can say. The courts moving too slow is a grievous injustice in blue states - but in red states it borders on fascist tyranny.

yep people thought it was a comedy, it was actually a documentary.

You know, I've seen more and more people wearing crocks unironically.

A lack of documentation would end the discussion. To get to tennant status you would have to openly announce your presence (usually a newspaper ad or signage) take over utility payments, and then file for adverse possession at your local court house with your SSN and ID. At this point the owner is contacted and can stop you. If they choose not to, the owner cannot be contacted, or it just goes uncontested then you become a legal tennant of the property. The newscast doesn't really go into any of this, probably for sensationalism.

@@henrychurch6062 Wow someone with an actual working brain. Glad to see one of you in the comments section. You're exactly right. They even mentioned the man had a lease, but they quickly glossed over that fact. This is definitely not a squatter situation.

@@henrychurch6062 wait what?just to be clear, so you mean that when someone want to get a tenant status of a house, and the owner of the house cannot be contacted, then the application for the tenant status can still go through/processed by the government?that shit is still crazy

@@skyh3r0es not quite, but close. There's a defined process for this in every state called "adverse possession" laws. The court is required to make "every possible attempt" to contact them, but what that actually means is a grey area... in practice it's probably just a letter and a phone call. But the larger part of it is that you have to be demonstrably living there openly. If you hide, keep the lights out at night so it looks empty, disguise your presence in any way... that nullifies the attempts to adversely possess the property. Practically speaking: In most cases your neighbors will call you, or report the intruder to the police. It's intended to be more of an "I'm here, and clearly nobody cares" than an "I'm in your house, what are you gonna do about it?!?!" situation. The original intent is for things like finding an abandoned farm house or cabin, and living in it for a generation and then owning it because clearly the owner isn't coming back... or to resolve disputes like "I just checked the property line and his 20 year old barn is 3' over it so can I make him demolish his barn if he pisses me off" and with adverse possession these things wouldn't need to go to court. To be clear this is a holdover from the frontier days where finding abandoned properties was far more common. The whole "squatting" thing is certainly not the intended purpose of the law. I would think extending the period before squatter rights kick in to two years (instead of 30 days) would be both reasonable and preserve the original intent of the law, as those 2 years would be trespassing.

@@jaypee9575 From who ? The owner ? If it is not the owner it is a fraud and he can sue the person who illegaly rented the house.

It's super rare to see

did they identify the squatters by name?

Don't know if this is true but I sure hope it is

Hope so this fucked Up Imagine loosing your Home To that Shit.what would Happen If she Just going in and geting murderd by the squatters .If she shhots the Guy For tresspassing IS she going in jail or its OK becouse she defends Here Home ?

What a polite gentlemen. Im sure they have a civilized discussion and come to a peaceful agreement.

Honestly I can see a time where American gangs end up having to fix this issue over the NYPD. It'll be their territories to lose so

New York people voted for that or politicians? That's a big difference...

nyc got israeled policy

@@menotfunnyclips8982 my god you are an absolute clown...

FJB

@@Pytliczellothey voted for progressive communist politicians, now these politicians are stealing property of there citizens cause taking out a loan from a bank to build a house and paying it back in a timely manner with interest rates is now illegal

Sort of like "women's rights". You know those humans that naturally gravitate toward socialism. At some point, you just have to say that's enough rights, we're going back.

What's next, mugger's rights? Shoplifter's rights? How about kidnapper's rights?

Sounds like the woman needs to become a squatter in her own home. Game the system back.

Most large cities already have shoplifters rights. Steal $950 or less and they won’t arrest or jail you.

Arms too.