😂😂

Hahahaha

You do have a pulse, yes.

These acts are not laws they are policies making them rules not laws. Laws apply to man you are very well trained as a citizen aren't you.

Man is a walking screensaver, mankind bouncing in his brain, im amazed he could operate a vehicle

​@Ordinary Memberdude not even

@Ordinary Member What definition ? An Act of Parliament *is* law. That's how laws are passed.

@Ordinary Member administrative laws are those that relate to decisions of government/gov bodies. These types of laws are mainly heard and determined through tribunals. The Summary offences act (the one in question) is an act of (very low level) criminal law- matters that can be dealt with by the magi court. Anything under this act is a law.

​@Ordinary Member bills are draft acts, once passed by parliament they become acts of law.

@@kenny1034 legislature is mistaken alot for law.

or that Gravity is just a 'theory' and not a fact therefore it doesn't exist.

@@coolpras26bruh we all know fig neuton invented gravity to get some tail 😂

Spot on. The "act" can outline laws.

​@coolpras26 exactly. Theory used in the scientific sense is actually knowledge, not a theory in the context of other standard meanings of the word.

If he kept going with that, he may have had something lol, same as the V, wasn't a law to get it, it was an act, met with blackmail. But he flew right past it a second later lol. He's in the wrong obviously, but just saying.

But keep going and we can downgrade you to unalived

blacks law dictionary read it

"Dispatch, we have shots fired."

Oh, you're still alive she said And do I deserve to be? Rights until an Act passes In the empire...

Gold comment

Well said!

Indeed, enforcing seatbelt laws reminds one of a father disciplining his children, only a tyrant would feel the need to enforce this ludicrous "law".

Bootlickers.

@@sothis1448 They enforce it because they're tired of having to clean brains up off the road, admittedly most people act like they have none at all.

Yes it is actually google it 😂😂😂

@@king_glitchy2623 umm, what are you implying? You realized i quoted the video here right?

It was just mind-boggling to hear someone even say that. Like just imagine how wild reality would have to be for that statement to be true.

@@karmatraining Ikr lol. Like if that were the case, why would they bother making that act? If it had to be called "law" in the title, they'd just replace act with law. These people are brain dead

I bet most sovcits use the freedom of information ACT as often as they can..

He's going to cite maritime law to 'invalidate' the trial

Only SovCits can turn what would most likely have been an informal warning into prison time

@@MemeMarine real

@@kikidevine694 I love how the whole basis for their reasoning that the laws don't apply to them is they claim to not be a citizen of the country. ...they know people visiting from other countries still need to obey the laws of the country they're in, right?

@@masondegaulle5731 errrrr can I plead the 5th on that?

I think the police finding it quite amusing really. They get a real buzz out of watching these people digging themselves a deeper hole with their hypothetical spades.

That's an angry 80 year old woman mate

@@AussiePomThat's a good point. It must be an ego boost for the officer to realise he's 100 times more intelligent than the guy in the car.

@@GrandmaNUT Aussie men do sound a bit like old women when they get all hysterical and whingy like that 😂😂 But it's definitely a typical Aussie bloke.

Imagine locking people in their homes for nearly three years, not allowing rhem to leav or enter the country and then having the audacity to even get snarky towards the people you opressed for so long.

what school you go to that teaches law in 4rth grade?

​@Chan man It's not law, it's entry-level Civics.

You failed every grade. It's contract law.

Haha you clearly failed 4th grade then as an "act" is not law, it's a contract. These cops work for a private corporation and they then attempt to contract with your person.

@Jeremy none of that made any sense.

And then made his footage public. Got home, only copy of this in his private possession, and decided he'd put it out there...

​@@phineascampbell3103theres the police body cam too

I wonder if the original video is still up lol

These idiots always think they "gotcha" to cops but their stupidity prevents them from seeing what a fool THEY look like when making these videos. Tgey think being a difficult and ignorant person is a GOOD thing.

😂 The driver roasted himself by posting this so we could all laugh at him.

@@User0player1 Laws in Australia are created by an Act of Parliament. Simple really.

😂😂

😂😅

And he reproduced

Yes he is and shouldn’t breed!!

😂😂

I don't think that 80 year old mankind lady thing should be driving XD

Poor old biddy.

That’s the reason. This are the guys who deserve a good slap on their faces

Hand me your paperz.. sounds familiar?

@@rjbourgeois5490false equivalency much

You've got scratches on your knees, mate.

@@Jimpiedepimpieyou have two digits in your IQ mate

You're missing the point. Its contract law. There is a difference between legal and lawful

@SanctusPaulus-ic5gl You shouldnt talk about things like that if you have not actually researched them. Scott v McNeal (1894) Allen v Dundas (1789) Cestui que vie Act 1666 sect IV Corpus Juris Secundum - sect 16, page 892 "From herein all interaction is based in contract law"

@Sanctus Paulus 1962 it’s legislation not law. You definitely fell for the covid narrative 😂

​@@Garycarlyleciting cases from before Australia federated seems a tad irrelevant tho

Yeah this BS works in America where police get 3 months of training, but it doesnt work anywhere else where police actually have education.

All the privileges the government provides ? Mate, we live in a democracy for a start not North Korea & every citizen has a right to make their own decisions regardless of the fact those decisions may lack intelligent oversight ! 😂 Having a nanny watch over us all makes us neither smarter/safer or more aware, just more controlled & less capable overall. 👍

you mean what WE PROVIDE FOR OURSELVES, the government cant even repay their own debts HAHAHA you really think they are providing for us.

​@user-zk1hv7mk9v privileges is another word for protected rights. Rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. Your right to do as you please is balanced by your responsibility not to harm others - i.e., impinge on other people's rights to safe and peaceful lives.

I think knowing what jurisdiction your in in any given time would help as well.

@@user-zk1hv7mk9v You don't have a right to operate a vehicle on the road. It's a f'ing privilege. Full stop. This has nothing to do with a democracy or being compared to North Korea. Tell us you don't know what you're talking about with out tell us. Take a seat son. Adults are talking.

I think it's called "Police Powers and Responsibilities Act" here

@@joebloggs24 I believe you're referring to the Victoria Police Act 2013. The one you mentioned may relate to Queensland Law.

Yes, but that's for participating parties. The people share the road, they aren't owned by some dead corpse, entitling proprietary of the tracks, nor of living unwilling beings .

Not saying you're wrong, just saying that government funded means taxpayer funded, and we all own it.

priceless

Soverign Citizens: "Ladies and Gentlmen, we got him. This cop committed a hate crime, therefore this ticket is invalid according to sovsh1t law."

To be fair, I have encountered instances of "sir" and "ser" being used as gender agnostic terms.

@@marginis are you saying the alphabet mafia made another word that has the same pronunciation as an already existing one and they expect people to ask them how they spell it? lol

@@IhaveaDoghouse Never heard of anyone asking how to spell "ser" when spoken, usually because it's known in context that "sir" and "ser" are the same thing ("ser" is just assumed to be used if the gender isn't obviously male). Not that this is commonly used in modernity - most usage of "ser" I've seen is in medieval settings and fantasy novels - but I have seen it used in a modern context. Not sure what you mean by alphabet mafia by the way. From what I can tell, "ser" was developed because a non-gendered honorific to convey knighthood was needed.

😆

And that is why I probably didn't get accepted into the police force! 😮

Precisely. The claim to be concerned about the one in a million chance of you being harmed by a seatbelt.

Ha ha ha. Violence! Ha ha ha.

Only in States Probably

Bro has no business being that good at yappenese

Bet you cant find any Legislation that has a King/Queen or Judge signature on it for it to become Law.

@@cralendo8469 In Australia does the Governor not sign on behalf of the Monarch's Royal Assent and in the UK once Royal Assent is given I believe acts are passed as law (I am sure there will be a copy signed someplace by a representative of the Monarch) I admit a person who was educated in law would know for sure.

@@cralendo8469 Yes I can. Every Act of the Australian Parliament has the signature of the governor-general from when the Act was passed. By definition, a bill becomes an Act of Parliament (a law) when it is signed by the governor-general, on behalf of His Majesty as of present.

He's not a driver he's a traveler

Playing semantics is kinda cute when you’re 5, it’s downright pathetic at 30

that would be awesome, deporting sovereign citizens since they are obviously not citizens 😅

This is exactly it, if they’re not a citizen then they shouldn’t be in the country.

@@tastytechaddictsmtbwe say this about Mexicans every day here in America and we’re called racist 😂

⁠@@719Flowerscause it is. You may not be a citizen in said country but you are subject to its laws.

wow. so you are calling for tyrnaical rule?? do you understand any of history and how RIGHTS came to be and what they are to prevent??. Nuremberg? Geneva convention? no of course not you are an australian, scared uneducated foolish little people pretending to be carefree and superior. learn your history, europe is cringing at your naiveite. next stop, authoritarian dictatorship

Grocery store is a private place so its up to the owner who they let in

Well there are various Acts of Parliament that funded the hospital system and the emergency responders, so I guess he doesn't need their attention since he doesn't believe in the laws that were passed to create them.

Perfect

Of course, he doesn't believe in that made up thing called the Law of Gravity.

Touché 😂

Furthermore he does not recognize himself as a legal entity in his own country, which means that he's not entitled to the healthcare that would save him.

hilarious!

Most of the ones on here really aren’t. Plus they do a lot of research.

U sound double boosted. RIP

Delusions of grandeur.

@kylethedalek there is no such thing as a sovereign citizen. If you live in a country and are a citizen of that country you MUST adhere to the law of face prosecution. The idea that u don't is moronic

I think if he was he would have been pulled from the car tazored and he lucky not to be shot. I’m glad it’s not like that here, but god guys like this test that resolve.

​@@chrisbeauchamp5563 depends if He is Black or White

Very wrong

Why does americans think the world revolve around them.... it's funny and sad

​@@Neuzahnsteinnot really. Not in a vacuum at least

Ive got news for you dude. He is smarter than you are. At least he reads.

Not likely. Not wearing a seatbelt is no more likely to cause an accident than wearing one.

​@@springerworks002 ok, please release your seatbelt and test your theory.

@@springerworks002iamverysmart.

@@springerworks002 You're correct there. But you're far more likely to survive an accident if wearing a seatbelt. And unfortunately there are some accidents that happen through no fault of your own, nor do you have time to react. Why else would professional race car drivers (some of the best drivers in the world) wear racing harnesses?

Its best to be polite and speak slowely when dealing with the mentally ill...

He is polite but oddly enough if not a requisite for being employed to ensure a country’s citizens adhere to the laws put in place.

He didnt answer the question though

@@jamesmorgan403 slowely??

@@Garycarlyle yes he did

You think we should just comply with everything? What if the next thing they demand is harming another person. Its happened before in history.

The nazi's thought everything was law and just started obeying...just like you would.... congrats

@@Garycarlyle ?

@@Garycarlyle No, you shouldn't comply with everything, but if he's telling you the actual law, telling you to search for it on your own phone so you see it exists, and they're being polite, sensible and telling you in the best way possible, and you still behave like the subject in the car, then you're part of the problem. If they ''''''demand''''' you harm another person then you can do whatever you want. Literally your comment makes no sense. It's as if someone said "Oh, look at that kid helping a grandma cross the street. Respect" and you answered with "WE SHOULD JUST HELP PEOPLE? WHAT IF THE GRANDMA IS ACTUALLY A SERIAL KILLER, IT HAPPENED BEFORE"

@@MistralNorthwind The guy only asked. Some of you are acting like he pulled out a weapon or something

We could say the same about you for going along with any law they put out, or the cop for not “assuming gender” when he’s clearly a man. I don’t agree with this guy and he clearly isn’t that bright but get off your high horse you aren’t special.

citizen I can see you are mentally unstable so can you step out of the car please

@@AI-Records24You aren’t bright as well.

@@Thecommentator-hc1fz good one! I’d be willing to make a bet, as an ex Aerospace engineer that I’m brighter than a random commenter such as yourself though.

​@@AI-Records24Ex, eh? Did they fire you when they realised you don't actually have an education... or...

As a German I would bring our own idiots on the table, who are thinking that Germany still is occupied by the WW2 allies and that the Federal Republic of Germany isn't a souvereign nation. You see, every country has it's idiots.

You're cancer in America

Unfortunately reality ain't Pokemon, can't catch them all.

I don’t think there is any problem with questioning the authorities. Just do it right.

They used to say when america sneezed, the rest of the world caught a cold.....well, it looks like America has dementia now..doesn't look good for the rest of us.

Most Aussie cops

Best officer ever

If the guy took off, I wonder what gender he would radio through? 🤔

Rare cop W

​@@JordanDragonAs nahh. Once police said he can't assume "gender", he should not be a policemen. What should he report when there is a crime? Should he report : "There is murdered victim here, and I can't assume the gender, it will be offensive to transgender community. I can't assume the race, it will be racism." How could this silly ideology work in society?

​@dcelecr how its smart

What's the definition of the word "act"? Say it.

@@letsdiscussitoversometea8479 Regarding legislation, an act is a term for a formal body of law. took this from an official law institute website also went on a government website that says Legislation that has passed both houses of Congress and has been either approved by the President, or has passed Congress over his veto, thus becoming law. acts become laws. when thet become laws, acts are laws

@@thEultimateTide_Pod Regarding *just* the word "act", and the word "act" alone, what does it mean without double-think? Why's it not just called "law"?? Why's it called something that a 2 year old could comprehend the meaning of??

​​​@@letsdiscussitoversometea8479 To my current understanding, an act is the written document of a law. You cannot have a law without an act and considering you can't even comprehend the meaning of "act" in the context of law, I highly doubt a 2 year old can

@@thEultimateTide_Pod But once again, you've gone on to use double-think... I'm not asking for "context of 'law'". I'm asking what the word ACT means. Just the word without ANY associated connotations whatsoever. What does the word *act* mean?

Nobody gets paid enough for this 🤣

They so fudging funny tho 😂😂

haha her face is like "please for the love of god, give me a reason to drag you out of that car"

She's a cutie why's throwing it away being a copper.

​@@user-tn3qf1gg1jmate what else is she supposed to be, good looking people don't have to be models by just being good looking

Ever given thought to the possibility that you might in fact be the one lacking information on the subject?

@@rjbourgeois5490 No

@@rjbourgeois5490 oh just shut up, little redditors istg

We should round up all sovereign citizens and just stop oil oranges. And make them fight till last one standing, than deport the survivors

Yes, then I double-checked, turns out I'm right

Yes! 🙄 People go on about the stupidest stuff

If you don’t recognize the bills of exchange act does that mean I can hurt you?? 😂

Exactly, and not have access to any of the first response services as well, no ambulance, fire or cop help

They certainly can't be protected FROM those laws, whatever their disturbed minds might think.

They also shouldnt be able to use public roads or public services like water or electricity. Morons can go live off the grid in a cave if they don't want to follow society and rules

He is simply a narcissistic con man who takes NO responsibility for his actions in the society he lives in. A parasite.

He was right though. Where in the 'law's does it mention that it applies to human beings?

@@Garycarlyle 😂😂 Where does it say that it has to? The "sovereign citizen's" handbook?

@@Garycarlyleactually a human is defined as a SEE MONSTER in Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition I think.

I'd love to know who they call if they get burgled. 🤔😄

@@Garycarlyle Why do all sovcits play with dumb misinterpretations of words like it's a magic spell? You're like children arguing with their parents that it's technically not bedtime because the telly was on a different channel when Miss Kim put Big Dog to bed.

Let me guess: you’ve only met American cops? Cops in Europe tend to be professional. This is not a particularly patient cop, it’s American cops that have no patience.

Police officers are great. Just have to deal with a lot of idiots

@@Na5iR11 facts also they hire people like this for the police force

Nah, he's just handling an annoying situation in accordance to his training. He's earned whatever he's on.

Errr... I think HE did. The "Sir" sort of gives it away.😂

hahahahahahaha right?

It was actually an incredibly subtle and professional roast if you think about it.

​@@karmatrainingtransphobes are such sensitive little snowflakes man, they can't even handle someone saying they won't assume someone's gender.

Perhaps, the police officer is the idiot here?

One of the few good apples. His patience and commitment to de-escalation are fantastic.

Laws require royal Ascension from the monarch look it up…

@@edwardgorecki7728 you should

​@edwardgorecki7728 Technically not by the Monarch. All laws are passed by the governor general who represents the monarchy.

Nothing Trump's the constitutional freedom to travel unhindered

@caronwilliamson951 You're right, nothing does. But you still have to follow road rules like seat belts. You can travel anywhere you like unimpeded for free on foot.

When they start arresting people for nothing you will change your mind fast

But why does he do it then? What do they get out of it? I don't get it.

@@suen5006 nor do I - but why do religious people continue to believe in God despite a lack of evidence? Like religious people, he's become part of a community that has a secret knowledge which makes him feel he has a power not available to other non-believers. He has all the supplements that Alex Jones has to offer, all those crystals and other magical nonsense and works on the assumption that this will make him live longer and better. And of course, he thinks actual religions are wrong and cultish, and his particular lifestyle is the 'true way'🙄

My adult nephew is the same and sadly I now no longer have much of a relationship with him. That's nowhere near the loss of a brother, but we were very close for 23 years. Now he's influencing my son [his slightly younger cousin] so it's an ongoing situation.

@@vivienclogger there is genetics involved. Even though you are brothers doesn't mean you got the same intelligence genetics. I bet you are the younger brother?

The term law has multiple meanings. A state may have laws, but there are also laws said to be universal or natural. For the human being it may be a law of nature that he should expect to be free of excessive incursion against his natural habits and need for freedom.

@@Tattlebot LOL, try that in court and see what happens. Turns out it's not true at all.

​@@stoptryingtomakemeusemynam7829turns out it is if you actually do your research in the matter. It's the reason people win deprivation of rights cases or settle out of court against tyrants who think that law is whatever the politician writes on a piece of paper.

@@rjbourgeois5490 No it isn't. The reason is usually something specific like a reasonable expectation of privacy as captured by the 5th amendment. Literally no court case has ever been won based on "natural rights".

@@stoptryingtomakemeusemynam7829 yes a specific right is cited from your natural rights as a means to rule a case. But the general all encompassing term of natural rights applies to every one of those cases. It's why 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242 are a thing in the first place. Because a criminal act to deprive someone of their God given rights, no matter which right is specifically encroached upon.

slobbering citizens

An Act is a company policy which is not the same as law. Acts are for those who act as legal persons/legal name/a fiction. Men don't act, acting and Acts are for non-living entities., men or women who pretend they are something they are not, which is a legal fiction/dead entity. This is why the corporate policy enforcer refuses to agree that the man is a man. He uses some lame excuse not to answer the question or agree. He either has mental problems not being able to identify a man, or he has been trained to not answer the question. Now you know why the man asked the man acting as a policy enforcer (a fictional character/role) if he is a man. It's not a trick question, but the policy enforcer needs the man to ACT as a legal name so he can force the corporate Acts on him asap fictitious entity. The is why the policy enforces must get your LEGAL NAME, so they can enslaved with their Acts. BTW, if an Act was law, it would be called a law. Show us where Acts are called law? It is only a presumption you make, or that has been implied by others that Acts are law. There are many presumption in the corporate legal system and in this realm we exist in. So be careful what you believe, as those beliefs could entrap you and limit how you live your life.

@@elrey8876 citizen=dead entity/legal fiction. The man with physical substance can slobber, the citizen/dead entity cannot as it has no substance

It's learned ignorance.

@@AlexandraWeller1 the more you type, the dumber I feel.

hear hear

We need less police, of any kind.

ACAB

I would challenge anyone to listen outside their home at 2am most nights anywhere in Australia. Other than the sound of traffic its so quite you can literally hear a pin drop. These parasities are ripping people off on the side of the road.

@@mtscott44tell that to the people in Baltimore and the south side of Chicago. I have seen the need for police and the lack of resources. If anything, stop giving the military hundreds of billions to fight in conflicts that have nothing to do with America.

Excellent! 😂😂

Same for all Indigenous who claim sovereignty was never ceded?

Sure@@philmusson1265

Any excuse to justify force, right? You'd probably cheer on North Korea.

This guy didn't know what he was doing....neither do you🤦‍♂️

For real tho. I was getting high blood pressure from just watching this video. This cop deserves a raise for putting up with people like this.

Many of the sovereign citizen types do try to provoke the police, and many apparently love conflict and arguing.

If he has that conversation in the wrong county of the USA his alive status would be about to drastically change.

Honestly one of the dumbest things I've ever heard someone say.

Different words mean different things especially when it comes to legalese. There are no synonyms in legalese. So yeah it's very important to make the distinction. In your mind a crime and an infraction are probably the same thing too?

@@endemion06463 In Australia where this is, an Act is law, generally a group of laws.

@@endemion06463 An Act is a body of laws. It's the same in most western countries.

@@drakkondarkblood6638 @karmatraining I think when people say an act not being a law they generally refer to the misconception that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

@@endemion06463 No they're just idiots. In Australia anything that is under an Act is law unless stated otherwise full stop!

​​@Ordinary Member So by using the road he has accepted that he is subject to the stipulations which allow him to travel on that road. You can't just decide that those stipulations don't apply to you when it becomes an inconvenience to you.

​@@reverendrobertparsimony8475nailed it

@Ordinary Member He's probably already done that... missed that Waka bro. To be honest he probably got booted off benefit... probably tried to argue his soverignty in regards to his Jobseeker commitments and obligations.

​@@reverendrobertparsimony8475 don't respond he's a bot

​@Ordinary Member I bet you collect yours

I can think of quite a few Acts like that. For example, the ones that state governments use to build the literal ROAD HE IS DRIVING ON

​@@Sonnabend00 so you have a monarchy

It's sad that there are grown adults that think "I watched a KZfaq video so I must be a big brain lawyer expert."

​@@jacksoncremean1664 guy just said he did a law degree, why u so butthurt??

​@@Sonnabend00 Pretty sure Charles is a queen.

King Queen tomato tomato