You can use a net, you can use explosives. It works.

except that's changed. see my OP.

ugh but you still need to tell them what youre legally obligated to tell them and show them your id/license when requested. if youre stopped just for traffic show your license. if youre stopped for drug possession show your id. dont lie there can serious backlash for lying to a police officer or sherrif.

@@jarrodyuki7081 Yes, if you're stopped for a committing an offense. But in that case to avoid the more obtuse of us from saying NO or starting a heated debate about why they should show their ID, it is only manners and good procedure for the cop to tell them that they have been stopped for a traffic violation or worse, albeit that it may well be silly to yell some mass murderer that you have stopped him for his killing spree, but that's where their right to lie comes into justifiable play. There again. what has manners and the care for procedure got to do with policing in America anyway.

@BelizeHD sooo he was caught lol and killed by the mobsters

mike85364 lol....yep...the first thing we want to do is start blabbing..

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mq6lmahl2p3WmX0.html

fuck you!!! ill say anything i want if i have nothing hide!!

@@jarrodyuki7081 yer an idiot.

not really. see my OP

$30,000???? That’s nothing, that’s a small settlement her entire case could have cost that easily. Sounds like NJ. One of the most corrupt states in the union.

"...remain calm and as polite and respectful as possible!" LOL You're kidding, right? These cop-hater punks aren't going to show ANYONE respect unless it's someone selling them drugs. ROFL!

Man this feels so wrong. In Europe most countries have zero tolerance. You get a breathalyzer on the spot, no questions asked. Any alcohol level? You are guilty. To be fair, I don't mind having such strict rules. Just don't drink and drive - it is really not that hard. :(

@@markmalasics8413 Then clam up and remain silent....like my advice to you now.

A анонимный also in Europe (or most of Europe anyway): You don’t have freedom of speech. You don’t have the right to carry a firearm for protection. You don’t have the right to remain silent-refusing to speak can be used against you. You don’t have the same rights against unreasonable search and seizure. So, thanks but no thanks I think I’ll take the American system any day. Also, just because you’ve been drinking does not mean you’re impaired so the whole nonsense of “if a breathalyzer shows you have alcohol in your system, then you get arrested” is an injustice.

@@alexblaze8878 I know of two different cases where the subject/suspect was able to delay the use of the breathalizer..One of them was telling the LEOs they just burped (not to sure about that one) or so he said afterwards)) ..The other was a Prosecuting Attorney of Yakima county WA. about 8-10 years ago who questioned the testing equipment's standards and how recently it had been tested and verified

You have guts

you got lucky

Jesus fucking christ........the same happened to me years ago. They were randomly pulling cars over and searching vehicles

@@ronaldmead7643 how?

@@critical_thinker73There state could allow these stops just like DUI stops. They could have forced him out and searched the car but did not for what ever reason. It is up to the officer depending on how the person is acting. It is called discreastion

What about a rear one?

@@ppumpkin3282 the more the better

I have cameras all over my person and the car. Cam helmet Cam pen in a t-shirt pocket Built in cam in my Levi's Cameras on every corner of my car and one 360 degree cam on the roof including 3 underneath to record the officers shoes. It's been 12 years and still waiting for a cop to abuse his power, perhaps I should be belligerent and violent maybe that'll get the officers to show their true colors and abuse their power. Fingers crossed. 🤞

@Andrew Rai given that you are in law school and haven't passed a bar exam, I would advise you not to give legal advice at all

J Simmons it’s common sense advice you idiot! He may not have passed the bar exam but he probably has taken criminal law classes and so knows a lot more about the law then the average citizen. He never said he’s an attorney.

Oooh I really like that one.

🙈Thats an RKO bro... thats like literally letting him know that, dont even bother asking again lol

*Well your doing exactly what he said dont do!?! He is a lawyer so i think his advice is not only better, but he has experience and credentials to back him up! DONT TALK!!!*

Hells yeah absolutely!!!

Ezekiel 25:17 if the cop arrests you in these circumstances it won’t be because you shut up. It will be because the cop has other supporting evidence other than your self incrimination, which is very rare. Most the time the only one with first hand knowledge is YOU! The rest is hearsay. So shut the F up. Don’t testify against yourself.

What ?

@@ariari4133 What what?

@@Galantski ja ?

@@Galantski Hier gaat het allemaal anders, hoewel de overeenkomsten !

Because I am deaf call my attorney here is his card. You call. Thank you. If he becomes aggressive normal thing ok for heRING PEOPLE shall become evident you may win lot's of money. So far new house and car from CALIFORNIA!

James Farrel You wrote, and I quote: " I don't think that most people know how to interact with the police." So I ask you, If you "Don't think" How are you able to arrive at any conclusion without thinking? Had you been better educated in th eEnglish language , your statement would correctly be: I believe that most people don't know how to interact with the police. Canyou now see the difference between the two statements. Learn that being gramatically correct is critical when making statements that apply to Law. Common street English is not applicable in law as it has totally different meanings and interpretations. Do everything you can to learn "Legal English' It is critical. Schools do not teach it because you are not meant to know it.

@@andrew_koala2974 you’re one to talk, LOL! Jesus Christ, your English is just as broken, idk wtf you’re trying to say with your atrociously spaced punctuation

Never take a field sobriety test, esp. at night. There is NO officer on the planet who is competent to evaluate one's neurologic status. This is esp. true of the elderly who will be expected to have elements of cerebellar dysfunction not due to impairment related to alcohol or other drugs. But you must take a blood test and your lawyer should be present for it if possible.

The 5th and 6th amendment apply to every state.

But the specifics he emphasizes Only apply to North Carolina. Each state has its' own laws. Know the laws of your state and those were you travel and do business. The best legal advice is to not do something stupid, dangerous or illegal in the first place. Otherwise, only the lawyers really benefit.

The fifth amendment of the constitution applies to all 50 states, however, and that is the best advice; don’t answer questions.

ethanol is fine though with a some spaghetti

May we politely suggest the following de-escalation for remedy? THE TRUST IS COLLAPSED....in other words, your company is no longer granting them any more credit. If the policeman is not lawfully investigating the crime on behalf of the male/female victim and is entering YOUR company jurisdiction without you summonsing them, then would it not be advisable to be politely placing YOUR public-servants/trustees under your notification that your company is charging $707 per hour/part-there-of for YOUR company time and also $717 for YOUR company performance?....and that any further communicating (verbal) and/ or corresponding (written) with your company, is with them accepting the terms & conditions of the commercial contract IN THE PRIVATE (the cop and their CHIEF and their POLICE UNION is now with PERSONAL liability.... because Notice-to-Agent-is-Notice-to-Principal....and also through JOINDER....and they also lose their qualified immunity) This way, you are NOT resisting/refusing to obey/comply with their orders/demands/policy /questions, but instead, you are now willing to perform WITH THE CONDITION that payment is with your company immediately, because you have NO CONFIDENCE with them administrating YOUR company trust! THE PUBLIC TRUST IS COLLAPSED...Why is YOUR company issuing them extra credit! Are YOU not the executor and the beneficiary of YOUR trust?...making them the trustees, whom are with their fiduciary obligation and duty-of-care to be NOT causing you injury nor damage nor loss nor harm. Is THEIR job YOUR job? Is THEIR company policy YOUR company policy? not unless and until they are PAYING for your company time & performance THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST IS COLLAPSED...YOUR company is no longer performing free-of-charge! You may be willing to pursue the matter through the small-claims-court and/or through arbitration which is held in-the-private because PUBLIC court is only for the PUBLIC servant. YOUR TRUST FUND IS NOW WITH RESTORATION....YOUR company is now making money from every encounter with YOUR public-servants because the days of doing something with your trustees for free are over. This will invole SOME talking to the police....for YOUR benefit. PS-Be the BUSINESS man with the public-servants.....NOT the victim.

@TheMrMarple Thank you for your kind reply. ...and you are right because it does depend on the individual. Some people have found that it may be best to place your public-servants/trustees under notification of the terms & conditions of commercially contracting with you. This way allows your attornee to have SOMETHING to defend at court (or before hand) on YOUR behalf. Others find that they may not wish to attorn (verb-to hand over, to give away, to acknowledge a relationship between a Tennant(YOU) and a new Landlord(JUDGE) may NOT be beneficial to their business interests and fend for themselves at court (and/or before hand)....after all, if you are NOT the public-servant, then YOUR business is in-the-private) With every good wish and good will.

@@millsbomb007 cute

@@mccabeianenator thank you for This information!

people tell me all the time the cops say that I can do this they can't understand why I say cops don't know the law

Mischievous Emperor Great info, thanks.

I don't know, it seems as if the cops are out for blood these days. I have had some really awesome interactions with a few cops even though I had broken the law and they carried me to jail. Even had one cop that after pulling me over, went in the store I pulled into and bought me some cigarettes. With my money of course. Then when I got to jail I realized my lighter was in my vehicle and he went through the jail and outside looking in all the patrol cars till he found one for me. I won't say the charge but he dropped it down to a lesser offense and to something that didn't even involve driving. Unfortunately though, it seems as if cops nowadays are being evaluated to make sure they have no compassion and will go about punishing or slaying the public like programmed robots taking orders from Dr Evil. There was a friend of mine whose 80yr old grandmother broke down on the highway. Instead of helping her, he told her if she didn't get it off the side of the road he would have her car towed. Where is the "serve & protect" they advertise on their cruisers? I thought there was a law against false advertising and the old "bait & switch" gig? You call them for help and end up dead or in jail. If that's not bait and switch, I don't know what is.

Marcos Harrod Lmaooooo

First off a Lawyer could be EDUCATED in civil law (business contracts and the like) and know nothing aboutcriminal law. Even those who know criminal law can may only no how to argue those laws in court and verylittle about how a Police Officer does his job of enforcing those laws.

Smoochy Pooh that doesn’t reflect very well on you or on corrupt police

NY here.....Agreed...My co-workers were mostly low lifes, I left after 10 years, couldn't take it anymore.

Just Obey!

@@davidtrindle6473 - The fact that she quit the department engaging in that behavior actually reflects VERY well on her. It takes courage to leave a stable job.

Thanks for sharing, but do you think your community/state would’ve been helped more had you reported your co-workers rather than posting a comment t about it after the fact? That’s like a former Nazi thinking he’s morally superior because other Nazi’s he knew committed horrible acts and he did nothing about it.

exactly, as soon as the first word leaves their mouths, the pen is all ready on the chargesheet paper.

Great comment and so many people do this. Hell I'm guilty too.. . .lol

Rap snitches tellin all they business

And if you don’t answer their questions then you’ll be on a first name basis with your lawyer because the cops will always punt you for your freedom. They get paid to destroy the citizens and ignore the criminals.

Thanks for the advice.

77gravity But Your honor at the time my phone "identified" only as a camera.

It's not an offense anywhere if it is used during a actual police stop🤣. And you are legally allowed to pull over and take a call off the road in all states

I just turn the camera on and prop it in the cup holder

where?

The Constitution died at the Supreme Court.

Rob H. Federal law supercedes state, so federal agencies such as the border patrol can set immigration checkpoints based on the supreme court decision.

Rob H. I'm sure that's true, at the same time, most of the states you listed have immigration checkpoints.

Rob H. No, interior checkpoints.

Rob H. Yes, immigration checkpoints. And that's 75 air miles. An example of one is the San Clemente checkpoint in California. On interstate 5 in Orange county, approximately an hour and a half drive north of the U.S./Mexican border.

They're designed so that even the soberest of people would have difficulty passing them, which gives police an easy reason to arrest.

Yep! They’re tyrants!

right. one question after another like , how long have you lived here , why are you here, why do you have an out of state id, where are you going, when they have no proof of any crime, there just working there area and checking things out. I was like when will this shit line of questions end and at the same time, crap if I don't answer this or that question they put the burden of guilt or possible arrest in the equation. all the while she says she just wants to make sure I'm not breaking into my storage unit while the fffing open lock is on the hood of my car and there is no damage to the storage unit door. she says she needs to make sure this is my storage unit, all she does is ask stupid questions and run my drivers license over her radio. No mention of the storage unit to the person on the radio or storage unit number, kinda hard to verify its my unit without that info right? guess she was trying to meet some quota. Freedom , what the hell is that?

Nah, it’s been like this since they handed out the very first badge. The job attracts people who like these power plays. Period.

Don't even talk to the police with a lawyer present. You are not required to participate in your prosecution

excellent. another person aware of the train wreck otherwise known as _Salinas v. Texas_ . www.stloiyf.com/blog

My 'politeness' at the time of them pulling me over, questioning me or interviewing me will be me saying nothing.

Oooh so he mistakes you for one of dem intelecktjugals! Schmaart..

Eddie Vamp AT LEAST 55.

Hahahaha

This former cop liked it immensely. The attorney was correct in every respect, however I would never get into a conversation with police at all. Remember, they are not your friends. They used to be years ago, but not now.

@@alexp3752 that's a shame, wish sheriff Andy Taylor were still the norm.

Up to 285

I have severe anxiety with these road pirates. Where I live they are paid serial killers.

Steve Adams you sound like a pasty little coward

He just said to ask. He never said anyone was owed an answer.

yes of course.

i think its better to not answer at all...they can use every single word and molecule against you, even if you are innocent.

Please watch this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mpNnopypvtablXk.html

I say yes. You never have to answer any questions asked by police - ever - but it's probably a good idea to tell them "No", or "No, I haven't had any alcohol". This puts the ball back in their court. Refusing to answer the question instantly raises suspicion, marks you as uncooperative/defiant, and will likely escalate into a confrontation. The goal is to get out of this situation as quickly and easily as possible. Once you've answered their first question - if you choose to answer it - you should cordially and politely inform them you're not going to answer any more questions. You could say something like "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer any more questions.", or "I'm not going to answer any more questions". If they press, remain firm, and later (in the words of an attorney I have a great deal of respect for) "be rude if you HAVE to".

When Police use the words "Have you been drinking" You can answer YES And when you pass the Breathalyzer and you are asked "What did you have to drink" Answer "A cup of tea" This happened to the sister of a Highway Patrol Officer I have known for decades. Since that Event .. Police are more accurate in asking the question. "Have you had any ALCOHOL to drink?" ... That is a specific and unambigous question, and is the CORRECT question to ask.

***** : Yeah, it would. Or _should._ (Courts don't always uphold the constitution, unfortunately.)

Captain Quirk Which is treason of oath....

+kurtis durfey yes if your mind goes blank, just pull out a card and hand it to them, just so long as you keep your mouth shut. Do not be a witness against yourself. Does not matter what they say. You can also write down that 'I do not consent to searches'.

WELL THE REASON I BELIEVE THE COURTS DONT UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION .. IS BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED SINCE LINCOLN SO OUR LAND HAS BEEN UNDER MARTIAL LAW EVER SINCE .. the courts are military courts here is a nice little link www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/master_file/martiallaw.htm keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/tag/u-s-still-under-martial-law/

kurtis durfey yes, a good lawyer, like mine, his business card will have a short concise message to the police printed on the back. You simply hand that over with your license and registration if your bring pulled over in a car. If you're on foot or other wise not driving, then just the card

Cop: Please watch less CNN.

Always record every conversation with any government employee or official. And never admit to being a PERSON. One is either a Man or a WoMan. A PERSON is a corporate fiction. A genderless DEAD entity. Notice that is why Grave Stones are written in UPPER CASE letters .. The ALL CAPS name is a PERSON. The living soul that is alive has a name in Mixed case. and a 'given Name' and 'FAMILY' name, Only Corporations have a FIRST NAME AND LAST NAME ...

@@andrew_koala2974 I would seriously hate to be Assumed-DEAD kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nbGiZZufsbrSqp8.html

Andrew, you're correct on the recording part, you're completely wrong on the rest and you'd be told exactly that if you spoke to a lawyer, judge, Constitutional expert, etc.

@@eileene.5870 You dear Eileen are misinformed. /AMIRALTY LAW /JURISDICTION Admiralty jurisdiction (of the Sea) because the land belonged to the King of Great Britain. And that's how he runs his country. Under the Admiralty/Maritime law of the Sea. Everyone is considered a vessel, and presumed DEAD, or to be lost at sea. {Ces't Que Vie Act 1666} lawyers, judges, will not reveal the truth. I would recommend you do your homework and study the above-named act, and take it from there. ► The Living and the Dead 12:35 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j5efoZWAttvciH0.html Nov 3, 2016 CHANNEL: Bill Turner

@@whoisewe4011 Admiralty jurisdiction (of the Sea) because the land belonged to the King of Great Britain. And that's how he runs his country. Under the Admiralty/Maritime law of the Sea. Everyone is considered a vessel, and presumed DEAD, or to be lost at sea. {Ces't Que Vie Act 1666}

I dont know. Its a good way to stall for time. Maybe you'll be less drunk by then.

UMMM....not quite. You can request a witness only for your breath test [Intoxilizer]. And they have to be there within 30 minutes. You have no "right to a witness" for the SFST's. BUT...yes. You can refuse to take them. Just remember though that everything and anything the officer can observe while dealing with you can be used as evidence. The officer can use any sense, sight, sound, smell, touch, taste, to gather evidence. Let's say for example that you really just had 1 beer but your buddy bumped you and you spilled have of it on yourself. So you SMELL like maybe you've been drinking a lot. You're sober. Is it not better that you preform the SFST's which are most likely audio and video recorded and will show to any judge or jury that you weren't impaired instead of refusing them [as most lawyers advise], being arrested, and then refusing a breath test [again, as most lawyers advise] and having to go through that process and HIRE AN ATTORNEY to help defend you and work through the process of getting a limited driving priviledge or getting your license restored. Talk or don't talk. Take the SFST's or don't take them Refuse the breath test or don't. It's all up to you.

Obviously, there has to be a reasonable time limit for getting a witness for a FST because your body is destroying evidence as you stand there. Of course the officer is still observing you the whole time including being within earshot as you call on your phone.

Funny how the courts don't agree with you. They must be wrong.

WOW. Talk about not knowing the law. Terry vs Ohio. ALL the police need to stop you is REASONABLE SUSPICION. On a scale of 0-10..its about a 1.5. Can't just be a hunch...but it can be an educated and experienced hunch

You are lieing.Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), ... This reasonable suspicion must be based on "specific and articulable facts" and not merely upon an officer's hunch.

JT A go read the law officers manual.