Still they repeated everything in SSR case

+vrajrulez Yeahm because she is in a beauty contest, and has to be pretty to be taken seriously. -_-

+shoorveer singh c is nt normal, c is scary...lol..

bhai door se bhi dar lagta hai

This is so sexist.

XD

Lol

+Mahender Singh Rajpurohit hahaha, I surely need gripe water after watching this interview :)

+Scrublord bhai log interview promotion ke liye hi dete hai

+shobhit todi Then why the media keeps complaining about politicians not giving them interviews? Shouldn't they know? Election khatam to Promotion bhi khatam.

+Scrublord if interviewees are paying NL then i wonder about their intelligence. Whom will you pay to mainstream or marginalised media ?

Ankur Jain or NL doesn't cost much?

+Scrublord My point is if I want to get promoted by paying, I will pay times of India, Aaj Tak, Comedy Nights with Kapil etc why would I pay Newslaundry or thehoot.org

She deserves that. It's not about agreement. It's a fact.

😂😂😂😂😂

No bro it’s too harsh,specially for a woman

Both actually are more beautiful than your mother.

Barkha repeatedly said, 'even without anyone else telling us we should have thought it iut ourselves " she completely agreed they all made mistake.

What would you like to have seen in the interview ?

+Hit Ler How less you study and read for such dumb comment Shit ler ?

Much lesser than Sudhir chou

Madhu Trehan owns the NewsLaundry channel

Hilarious😁

No kidding 🤣

Jabardast 😂😂

TLDR: That is just how she views 26/11. You are welcome to yours. Btw I also do not agree with her views *With all due and humble respects* It may be that this is how she viewed 26/11. She was a reporter and may be she saw some things (which she never mentioned) led her to this conclusion.

+PRASHANT MISHRA But there is a major difference: you can never find Madhu in the pimping business and acting irresponsibly during terror attacks and other such emergencies. Just because the ruling political party in 2008 was in her pocket, Bdutt misused the media access in Mumbai attacks and helped terrorists with all the information about the security forces' movements.

Vijayan Thankappan You seem to think that she did it on pyrpose, as if, she wanted the innocents in Taj to die? Yes, sounds absurd right?You must be perfect in life . For me, best are the ones who accept their mistakes.The Goverenment then should have immediately stalled live coverage but I guess the then govt itself was getting all information from media!Go ask that gov for apology coz it had no idea that such a big attack was being planned on Mumbai and how badly they handled the attacks!

Prasanna S first of all, mumbai live telecast was not just being done by Barkha, i think it was collective media falut coz everyone went live. Though Barkha is the only onebtht has openly regretted it.I have followed Radia case closely and frankly speaking I don't understand the fuss( may be I missed something) Coz a) She didn't benefit money wise or power wise. Her report didn't favour the ones radia wanted etc So b) She was just playing Radia, coz Radia was the one who would get her important information, That is, the scoops that every good journalist gets by such sources. I heard the tape and I was like OK she knows how to do her job! Then after listening to a private question people started to make it look like she was lying under oath or something Just to be clear, I am not her fan, neither I think she is a saint ( I mean,who is? ) But I know that she is a damn good journalist, which is something as all the good journos are from print media.

+PRASHANT MISHRA Chill dude, she has you in her control, the most oppurtunistic journalism at its best and Barkha leads the pack.

+PRASHANT MISHRA Agree . Both stalwarts of journalism , ruled their profession in their prime.

What about Amit Shah or Modi ? All their interviews are fixed or pre-planned.

Lol . What is MSM ? ( assume its main stream media ) never heard that acronym

Mohan Bhargava Main stream media

*IMHO* Our dear PM Shri Narendra Modi ji just cannot only do interviews bin MSM. He has to do some non MSM interviews (cause a significant percentage of people also follow those and it will also show how well he handles a biased media) and will show a balance

She went easy on because she knew Barkha is not going to take responsibilty for any decisions she made.

+Svaanand Umbarje How do you know its fake? Do tell. She claims to be a victim. As a member of this society if you don't want to support her (and that's fair) , at least don't belittle her feelings. Only the people involved or a court can pass a judgement on what happened.

+Mohan Bhargava - fuck off and get a life.. seems you are a chamcha of that Bitch.

+vamsibg People like you spew hatred and venom without any logic or reason. So you need to get a life. I am trying to have a conversation with people here. So you should GO FUCK YOURSELF.

+Mohan Bhargava .... I repeat again, fuck off get a life which part of it didn't you understand. Secondly, Burkha Dutt is a birch, the rationale behind this belief is she sold her integrity , morals and ethics which are the important qualities a generalist should have for sake of money and fame and also for trp ratings. she is anti-Hindu, anti-bjp and anti-nationalist. given a chance, I guess, she would sell India to Pakistan. there are many examples.

+Mohan Bhargava may be you should stop explaining so much to such insensitive people who jump to conclusions just because of the pre conceived notion about a self made woman in their filthy mind!

What nonsense are you saying? Barkha Dutt is a Pimp Journalist, she only works for those who have dirty money

But it's just sad how people are. Blind in unnecessary following people's loyalties.

a unloyal indian???don't fall for her fake book trying to get sympathy and support for her anti hindu approach nice try . check out RAJEEV MALHOTRA'S THE SYSTEMATIC BREAKUP OF INDIA AND THE FIGHT FOR SANSKRIT on utube pass info on to friends and read my comments above please

saurabh your abs have killed me and I feel elated

What ???

Couldn't agree more !

+PRASHANT MISHRA presstitute - she is. everyone knows she and her team of NDTV are hard core anti right, anti hindu. they r left leaning, everybody knows that. so no harm in calling them a presstitute or ant modi. anti national, well i am not sure. may be or may not be. feminazi, well we need more of them, india still has huge gender biases in its societies.

***** What's wrong in being left leaning ? I can name many topmost juornos in India who are quite openly ( and respect that they are open about it even though I am not right leaning in my views) right leaning? They are well educated, respected journos who have right wing views.I would never call them presstitute.Never. Also what's wrong in hating Modi? In fact , also, there is nothing wrong in liking Modi. Yes, this is the beauty of democracy!

haha... u know what happens to democracy when u 'lean' LEFT. maybe its a good old ideology, maybe it has done some good to the world. left in India has been more of a means to oppose any govt. that is in the center, supported by the chinese to destabilize India. To me LEFT in India has 2 type of subscribers - 1. the crazy old professors and shabby intellectuals who wire in yuan and take orders from beijing. they r neither loyal nor have any affection towards LEFT they just do it for money. their job - to radicalize vulnerable youth to take up arms which make up the type 2 subscribers. these youth neither know the ideology nor they know what are they fighting for, they r just fascinated by colorful talks of type 1 and like firing bullets and just want to vent out their frustration of their own failure in life. Left in India is more of an outfit to destabilize and hinder growth in India and moreover these presstitutes(the type 1 subscribers to left) lean to left for the same reason to destabilize, to shame India at a global level, their intention - hurt India's growth at any cost. Now that modi is in full swing to help India become a global power and taking radial measures to root out corruption and making good friends at international level, these presstitutes are more but hurt and getting more aggressive. but it is just my views, maybe u see it differently and i welcome ur views, it is in the true sense of democracy to consider everyone's views but do u think u would survive an open talk on democracy in a far left nation like ppl openly talking about far left survive here in a democratic country?

***** You sound autocratic, no wonder you have been so impatient about our democratic history. People used to say the same about Indira Gandhi. Nobody has damaged the face of Indian democracy more than her.Now it looks like fan boys of Narendra Modi are ready to compromise the way constitution works coz you are so impatient. India is dirtier and poorer , has worse standard of living than countries like North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia & Iran but I still think India is better coz we here can be whatever we want.Left( which I am not BTW) right centre etc My dream for India is not for it to become a developed autocracy but a developed democracy where girls, boys transgenders gays SC ST OBC everyone have equal opportunity and acceptable standard of living Where nobody dies of preventable diseases. where no one is killed becoz they were born in a particular caste or have a particular sexual orientation or eat a particular kind of food ..... Where everyone minds their own business but at the same time contribute to society I am in my twenties so I still have hope to be able to one day see that India

PRASHANT MISHRA cheers for the dreams, to urs and mine. though we may defer in views, we both wish the same for India, so lets just agree to disagree. BTW i am in the first half of my 20s as well. And i too have the same hope that u have ;)

+Arun Gadamsetty Why ??? Could you please enlighten us.

no there is another journalist karan thapar..difficult to say who is worst

very true bro

+Arun Gadamsetty Not at all.. she has a competition Sagarika Ghosh..!!

+pranavg1181 And how did we all forget rajdeep sardesai, these guys have set milestones in irresponsible and biased journalism. It will be extremely difficult for any future journalists to cross these milestones of paid journalism.

genocide was one sided whereas here hindus were killed in godhra.. u talk about gujrat not godra.. if ur son and wife were burnt alive wouldnt u be furious.. what would u do in the heat of the moment.. dont try to be the judge of peoples emotions.. just sit where u r comfortable in ur home and dont pass judgements u one sided moron

@@xandercage5004 I'm referring to East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). Not Gujarat!

@@fredericknoronha9998 of course i know.. iam referring to u using barkha dutts name in this context... she is taken in the context of gujrat right?

@@xandercage5004 The debate is about "a little bit of self-censorship" and how journalists could respond to this argument. Not Gujarat or West Bengal, BJP or Congress. Sorry

@@fredericknoronha9998 Yup u said the self sensorship is actually not required.. whereas iam telling it is

+trueKingOfLoss journalists are never supposed to support an idea or ideology. they are supposed to report plain facts and organize events where learned men and women can come over and discuss on ideas or ideologies. they are supposed to convey and present the facts, not judge on facts.

+Deeps 91 Why?

trueKingOfLoss 'why' like in'why so serious'?

+Deeps 91 No, why as in why should journalists not draw conclusions based on facts?

+trueKingOfLoss Reporter reports, listener or viewer decides.

They are asking for subscriptions. They are not begging to you.

+steelnerve lol . Whe does not satisfactorily explain her mistakes

+Amit Singh 38.00

You forgot Kargil , 26/11 etc.... These Journo has blood of many people on their hand....

Romesh Khardori I think you missed that there could have been an apostrophe Sherlock.

She always looks like 48

The army chief or any soldier never said that about her.

never

always

***** Always as in Severus Snape's words "ALWAYS"

+Swastik Sharma yes because ndtv's news contents are not based on trp not to create a particular propaganda in the society.. :-)