I sometimes wonder that barter system was better. Aapko real mein kya chahiye ye bataiye. Sabun? kapdta? Hum bana ke bhejwa denge speed post se. Par ye kaam hum khud ke liye karenge. Kisi ke liye naukar banke naukri to nahin karni padegi!

I subscribed with ₹₹₹ just to hear these two go on and on lol. Great idea whoever came up with this.

Mera 21 se joining hqi tcs me i will buy a subscription of my first salary Also a suggestion try interviewing ruling oarty politicians and right wing guys i dont see that often on this channel

Buddha:-Three things can not hide for long: the Moon, the Sun and the Truth. Buddhism is very scientific and flexible.

Buddha didnt believe in concept of GOD

The problem with this discourse that I see is not defining the relegion at the outset - is it the practice of relegion or the theoretical doctrine, does this also include philosophy, which at least in Hinduism stems from relegion. Sanjay is criticizing the practices of religion, Kunal is defending the theoretical principles of relegion rather spiritual aspects of it. I think no rationale individual can defend how relegions are practiced.

Also religion tells we know the truth that here is the truth, they are clearly not coming to any truth like science

@@prabpharm07 Philosophy used to be science when we didn't understand laws of physics/nature. Philosophy is a wonderful subject, I love it and I promote the study of it. But in the current times, without taking science into account, philosophy is simply a corpse. And I don't think Sanjay is simply criticizing the practices of religion but religion as a concept and is quite accurate to do so. If a theory is flawed, doesn't matter how nice the paper or the font, it will do well to stay out of a trash can. That's precisely what religion in any form is. Still people ought to have the choice to follow or what they like and this is where being civil comes into the fore. It should kept it in pants and not forcibly administered, that's all.

Achaa.. hahahahahaha

Hui

@@pakoochavo8696 Ha ha ha. Well, he is in a spiritual realm where you feel that one mustn't completely dissed off the goodness religions may provide.

Just Brilliant Stuff !! ..... Sanjay Rajoura gave an articulate explanation @ 10:00 that even non-scientific students can understand what Quantum mechanics is and how it works. 🐱 #Schrodingercat.🐈

Spirituality or philosophy?

👍👍

Achha hi nahi bahut hi achha

​@@hashminuman3120 Let them talk about your religion then we'll see...How much rational you are...We as Hindu are much more rational as well as Christians also but you guys...And I loved this video...

It could be religious not spiritual. A spiritual person lets people do what they want but just puts his views and lives with peace.

so true

i would have spent 300 rs to listen to kamra and sanjay rajoura but this auto payment for every month is so fucked up

😀😀

Are you rational or spiritual?

That needs courage. I can't do it. And so I respect you

So often, we'll lose the courage too,,societal conditioning gets into the subconscious somehow, however against it our beliefs are. It's almost a daily fight,, finding that fine line between coexisting and rebel.

study Ramayan and Gita

🙌🏻

@Mohammed IFHAMUDDIN study understanding muhamad by ali sina

Aah...a proper comment....!! Rare scenario...

I totally agree. Spirituality based on Religion is all about doing your homework well by looking for the truth based on your own observation and rational approach. You shouldn't believe whatever you listen from other people without doing your own research and analysis. 99% people are forced to believe on whatever their parents say as the sole truth and don't do their own study. We are too lazy to look for the truth rather we would like to believe whatever our elders and gurus teaches us with blind faith.

@@pakoochavo8696 Spirituality is accepting the fact that other can have different opinions and you dont have to accept it, but you also dont need to be condescending about it.

@@pakoochavo8696 well then in that case spirituality is a freedom of thought. Each individual has his/her idea of spirituality..and one can b non spiritual as well. The only problem with your comment was the condescending nature of it. Had you ask a question without it about spiritualism you may have got different and beautiful answers from others. We dont have to accept or agree with everyone but jst bcoz you have one set of belief doesnt make other's beliefs untrue. Try asking question but only if u want to know more not because you have to prove someone else is beneath you.

@@pakoochavo8696 to add..i dont completely agree with original commentator however what i liked was how it was expressed..without abusing anyone ..without any notion of self grandiose...thats wht i agree with..i appreciate the comment because it helps in understanding different perspective and you can explore the idea more and if it doesnt work for you discard it..

Han accha laga yar sun k

Aisa kya pata chal gaya

Sanjay sounded very shallow while Kamra hit the nail

Many girls alleged Sanjay rajoura on metoo shame on newslaundry for calling a molester and giving him platform

@@shubhamkumarjha4469lol dude stop spamming

Then you must not listen to good conversations.

Yes, because no matter who you are and what you do, you can't find logic in religion

@@divyanshgautam7279 absolutely you can never defend religion against science

Are behas ya baat cheet Jang nahi hoti , ki koi kisi ko harata phire , niyaz bhai

Like culture , religion is for masses

Great point!

Earth is flat 😉

"Also science cannot provide a moral system or a political one, those have to be decided by human beliefs and priorities. This notion that science is end of all knowledge is a very mistaken notion." Try out the Moral Landscape by Sam Harris. If there's one thing that religion certainly can't help with, it is morality. Harishankar Parsai's work demonstrates that very lucidly.

Dude, youtube showed me your response and now I can't see it. Okay, first thing- I apologise. Reading back my comment it seems like I was criticising you but I wasn't doing that, it was as a whole point trying to just add to the first bit but perhaps I should have phrased things more carefully. The only bit where I thought maybe I can add some perspective is by suggesting Sam Harris's book which makes a compelling case for science as an arbiter of morality. Again sorry if my comment seemed harsh but that wasn't the intent. :)

Are you asking Kamra to be like someone?

Honestly, if Kamra has found his life get better because of spirituality why should he give that up for anyone? Why should someone be strictly rational in every aspect of their life if it is emotionally draining?

Well not quite . The rational behind respect for the elderly is Thier physical and mental state gets weaker , so we shld be sensible to tht 2 . They have lived through sm things wr hv not . Science indicates a lot of factors in good decision making . Experience being a strong one . Thus (many times , rather most times ) they are more capable than younger ones . Point close

@@VARUNSINGH-ri2he Children's mental and physical states are weaker. They haven't even had any social experience yet which warrants even more attention. So, by that reasoning, they deserve the same amount of "respect". But, we don't say "respect the children", do we? Actually, "respect" is an ambiguous word. Most people mean 'be polite' when they say 'respect'. The two are different but thought of as one. Politeness is a type of behaviour. Respect is a sort of admiration or appreciation for someone's status or accomplishments. As far as the argument of an older person being more experienced and hence deserving more respect goes, it depends on what kind of an experience he has had. A teenager who has travelled a lot and come across many different people and societies would be far more 'experienced' than an old man who never even left his village nor his rigid values. What kind of a valuable experience would a narrow-minded or orthodox old person have which he could bestow upon the next generation? It's not just about age. And demanding respect merely for being older is quite ridiculous. Just don't be unnecessarily rude or respectful to anyone regardless of the age.

@@sunny123k bhaaai aag laga di 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

and don't forget Burma!

Religion and science coexist

Many girls alleged Sanjay rajoura on metoo shame on newslaundry for calling a molester and giving him platform

Spiritual are the debris of religious - Sanjay rajoura

My belief is that the Earth is resting upon the back of a giant space tortoise. Please, respect it.

I believe it’s resting on head of shesh-naag . Once your tortoise was sleeping and our naag took it over

Most translations of Quran were/are not done by Islamic scholars but by scholars of Classical Arabic. Part of the reason is most Islamic scholars are afraid that they maybe held responsible by Allah for mistakes they may do while translating Quran. And Quran was revealed to the Prophet to be read and Allah promises that he has made things clear in Islam, so basically the logic of needing a guru is against Islam, Islamic scholars are not typical gurus, they don’t remove anything from a hat. They dwell only on Islamic texts to guide Humans through their books/lectures, that is why Islam is very much theocratic and it claims that it is complete and needs no guru/scholar to modify it. Most of the people you see in Indian media with beards/skull caps are no Islamic scholars.

Also the point is very true that religion, myth and folklore, (whether it is Gods or Santa Claus or the Monkey Man of Delhi) may help under-evolved cultures (or even the growing minds of children) to understand their world through story telling and parables. But as minds and cultures evolve, these things should be shed and man should evolve to higher-order thinking based on science.

I was an atheist untill i realised that I am God

@@nm-nm-nm newton was devout theist.

@@VARUNSINGH-ri2he Perhaps, but one can still be a scientist, (or an inventor, surgeon, Olympian or billionaire) and still have some unscientific beliefs. It can also simultaneously be said that many atheists (even blasphemers) live perfectly happily without being struck down by lightning or disease. Which could mean that God either doesn't exist or is totally indifferent to these things.

Ye dekhne se Deen kharab na ho jayega ??

Allha ke maa bahen eak karte hein ye log aur tum

Paise to Mai bhi nai de sakta . Keval newsance ke liye poora subscription kyu

Cholas were Shivaites and do you see East Asian countries having huge temples for Lord Shiva or sharing cultural practices that are similar to Tamils ..... They might have expanded their kingdom which was the way the world functioned back then ... but it didn't result in total annihilation of local culture and traditions ...

Yeah. I agree. But technically it was not India. India is only 75 years old. These kingdoms you talking about were known as different countries back then.

@@pakoochavo8696 there is a difference between annexation and invasion. Sikkim was gifted by Bhutan, it was neither annexation nor invasion. Kashmir signed a treaty with India for annexation, bit Pakistan invaded the Kashmir after that and technically they are occupying half of it till date.

Philosophy precedes science. Renaissance gave birth to scientific revolution.

@@Burner__ Science has always been there. Philosophy has only been there since active consciousness began.

well he said that in the context of "reforming society to be more kinder and empathetic" not scientific development...without taking his frame of reference in consideration you are passing judgement a/c to your frame of reference.

In any context and he added the society thing later.

@@ravi9dra cool man. I said what i thought his context was and i have no issue if you think his context was different.

same to same , brother! I want to pay, but pirate bae, so I'll rather wait and watch as well! x)

Your comment deserve more likes. Well said!!😂

@@ParamveerSingh-zv4hj thank you

Same man

@@pakoochavo8696 🤣

Which is atheist country..??

Ok but the idea of a Hindu Muslim Book club is very funny to me lol

I think he understands the difference. He is trying to say that morality and empathy are values that were made mainstream by religion. That's his premise not mine

exactly more encompassing term would be "common sense" which Sanjay pointed out when he answered why religion is not required now.

Link for the previous episode please

😀👍👍👍 big thumbs up.. let's start

@@filmytape8244 i m alredy follow that. I dont practice any religion..but respecting all religion.

@@android5985 so this should be in the form of religion.. there will be no rules,no priest, no mandir , masjid etc. . Do whatever you like , obviously within law, eat whatever you want,

@@android5985 I also follow same but there should be a community, not just individual identity

@@android5985 I was an atheist untill i realised that I am God

Your comment is Bang On!!!!

Rajora didn't even touch the topic of spirituality. All he talked about was organised religion and science; and one must have unambiguous understanding of both organised religion and spiritualism. Second, Kunal never ever proclaimed his expertise on anything, not even on comedy. That's why he was here earnestly willing to listen the other. And last but not the least, how can you pass a judgement of such grandiose without being met him personally and listened thoroughly ? Are you the one who claim the expertise on spiritualism ?

You guys are amazing

And Jonathan nolan