Tesla writes in the Brooklyn Eagle newspaper on July 10th 1932: "I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device... More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them. I will tell you in the most general way, the cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor. I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan".

According to Gerry Vassilatos's book, electrons must be filtered out with magnetically quenched carbon rod spark gap put inside nitrogen atmosphere to absorb electrons so only pure neutral ether current flows through the Tesla Coil circuit. Also it says to avoid using copper for transformer coils, instead to use a hollow tubular glass for transformer filled with gas (nitrogen i think) as a medium which will replace copper medium so the Tesla Coil outputs pure neutral ether currents only. For top load, it says Tesla used glass ball filled with gas as using metal as top load will result in reintroducing electrons as metals will absorb ether and expel electrons.

Tremendous introduction to radiant energy… Thank you!

I`m very glad of find out you got that book. that will be the missing point that you need to get unlimited energy from zero point, and is more than electricity power, actually the true understanding of that technology is the true understanding of who we are and what is the all universe made of, Great stuff Master Ivo

Thank you for taking the time to provide this excellent description of radiant energy - you have explained this very well - it has turned on several lights in my mind, and in only 20 mins. Thank you very much for this!

great inspirational indeed. thanks for sharing

Stunning clarity on topics that require direct experimentation to understand. I was actually moved by your enthusiasm near the end. Nice build-up right before announcing part 2.

nice tutorial...well explained....this stuff is getting more exciting every day

According to Tesla Electrostatic radiant effects which are accumulative increase in voltage many times greater than the initial spark discharge

Hi Ivo, this was very interesting ! Can't wait for the rest of the series.

Really Fascinating! Thank you for your kind explanation of a part that is not readily delved into. Thank you and best regards.

The hammer metaphor is a great way to envision that difference of the energy flow. Just saw this video was a day ago... excellent, I'm in for the series. Great stuff, thanks for putting these videos together.

Viktor Schuaberger might help illuminate some of the specific phenomena Tesla describes. Vortex and flow can be used to leverage itself to a point of zero resistance. “The faster the flow, the less resistance” if the flow gets to a certain point zero resistance is achieved.

great video. cant wait for the next one!!!!

Ivo you have Definetely inspired me Sir!

I like your video.. and your right.. the exchange of energy can be done low voltage... this was what Bedini discovered with his Energizers. Your also right about the discharge.. I've seen the purple blue hue and also the Turquoise Pale blue colour discharge which I've captured on Camera. I've been playing with Joule Thief's of late that's amplifying the Radiant from 4.5v input up to 43volt spike on the output.. and it makes a great battery charger when used correctly... Excellent video...

Great vid , thanks for your job 👍👍👍

The only video with a good explanation of the Tesla work. Lot of useful information.

Quite fascinating ! Thank you.

New points to consider! Excellent!

It's been a while since I watched this and still I'm very impressed.

love your work keep it up! Your shining a light in a dark corner...

The Bifilar coil itself has the ability to act as a resonant capacitor, stacked coils with gaps between them, in particular with common and opposite polarities can have varying results in building huge amounts of energy, and what is described here is the energy finding the best path of ground, or in other ways Tesla would describe it, suffering it to find equilibrium.

Love it radiant energy Love to fiber out of the hairpin circuit Thanks good show and dubject

Very interesting, thank you for sharing more of Tesla's work! I'm off to Part 2, 3 ... more.

Thank you for sharing your insights and efforts!

17:05 - Yes, you can use low voltage and notice small effects on your oscilloscope, but you cannot catch sight of some possible effects on surrounding space from which Tesla obtained most of his findings. Don't get me wrong, your work is great! You are awesome electrical experimenter and I like your experimenting approach very much. I think you choose good direction and attitude for your research. You also have very good knowledge to handle electrical tools and instruments for obtaining and interpreting data very precisely and correctly. Do not hesitate to use high voltage impulses and discharges because you're capable for handling that. It's the same that you said you don't need to ride powerful bike when bicycle can also move on track. Yes, but it's not the same! :) Take acceleration force fo example.. Best regards!

Ocean waves travel and cannot be seen, until there is resistance, reef, or shore. Maybe a “wave” in aether is only made “electric” when it encounters resistance(magnetic field). Until then it is less electric in the hertzian sense

you are giving out gold in this series,,,

Hi Master, Good topic for investigación, as you said there is few información. Regarding the overshoot when switching on, if you take a look on the scope shot closely, you can see that the first rise goes to 12v exactly, then there is a drop and after it swings up to 15v. This is a nornal behaviour , as the coil's capacitace is chargeg up. When the electric field of the conductor is charged to the input voltage the inrushing current rises the voltage further.All this occurs bevore the magnetic field in the inductance is built up, and also can be repeated with non inductove coils, or including other conductive objects. The intensity of the overshoot depends on the energy x time product and the parasitic inductance of the switching circuit. Regarding the voltage certainly it is not necessary use high voltage, but some investigations have shown that certain phenomenon only occurs when a energy treshold is exceeded. Some investigators stated that they had to use a minimum voltage of 40 or 50 volts to achieve some effects related to longitudinal waves. Regards, Vidura.

My explanation of what's possibly happening at 4.50 min is the coil can not sustain the over sized magnetic feild so as it equalises it re converts some of its energy into voltage. Voltage can change direction quickly but current cannot. Just like a river. The flow of the water direction requires effort to change but the the pressure of the water can change direction with ease. Imagine a fire hose on full power and it take 3 men to hold it steady and direct the nozzle in the right direction. Its hard for them to instantly change its angle but if you stab the hose in the side it requires little effort and now the pressure voltage is squirting out the side. Easy for the voltage to change direction but harder for the current. Best analogy I can use would be water coming out of a hose and hitting a square plastic tub on the driveway and pushing it along. Initially it starts to push it but the water pressure is met with resistance and splashes some to the side but as it starts to move, more of the water pressure is used to propel it until the water equals the speed of the bucket. Think of the water splashing out to the sides as initial voltage spikes and the flow of the water as the current!

Good Stuff. Thanks, Master Ivo. Nikola Tesla and Charles P. Steinmetz both focused on the Dielectric and magnetic fields of electricity, separating them from the charge carriers that pondered along, far behind the speedy dielectric and magnetic field movement (waves of radiant energy). Tesla focused on maximizing the impact and energy transport of the waves alone, while Steinmetz worked on dampening or suppressing the waves totally. Both diverging from the rest of the EE world that was focused on the material properties of electricity ( the charge carrier movement) thinking probably that a material transferring energy (conforming to the Newtonian mechanics of energy transfer (conservation) was more rational and solidly gave an acceptable economic base that was consistent with the monopolistic operations put in motion to maximize the payback for investors becoming richer than kingdoms in the day. Funny how a difference in perspective shapes how you describe what is going on. Trying to minimize the easily amplified effects like Tesla vs. the minimizing effects that Steinmetz wanted for safety and reliability, keeping the designs limited and more valuable with no room for innovation or displacement with technological innovation. Someone had to keep the owners stocked with Kimchee. party on Dudes, Be good to each other.

now, this is a nice book club i'd love to join...

Thanks for the highly thought provoking concepts. Remember, like disconnecting a switch, you will always go pass the point of very weak connection, which drags the inductive charge through this micro space. The same goes with connecting the charges. The connectors go through a micro space which a magnetic field reaches out between the contacts. As a retired electrician, hi voltages will seek out a drain like lightning seeking a ground. That wavy spark seeking a good place to strike the ground, has a field that precedes this hit. Could this be the same? Thanks.

The flat coil is the best way to leverage a spark@ 1 million frequency per second. In other words, it is not enough to get a spark at 1 million per second. One must use the longitudinal “expression” to perturb the backround static electricity, and so running the spark through a flat will “tickle the aether” as Thomas bearden put it. I will be doing a build soon. I didn’t want to get it started, until I understood. It took me 12 years, but I think I finally get it.

Thank you.

I Wonder If These new silicon carbide (sic) diodes would help since it is said that they have zero recovery time, so the back oscillation may be avoided

I used a Mazilli Flyback driver to generate very small magnetic nanoparticles by using the discharge between two electrodes(FePt alloy). The amount of nanoparticles was increased by factor of 10^6 if I used bifilar Tesla coils placed in parallel to each other instead of a flyback transformer. The color of sparks was purple. The coils were placed in transformer oil and made of single copper wire. Short circuit between windings was avoided by using baking paper as separator. I tried generation with simple high voltage transformer but could not nearly generate such a high amount of nanoparticles as with Tesla coils. So be careful while experimenting with sparking and avoid an open system at the electrodes as inhalation might have hazardous health effects. I used vacuum tight tubings in which the electrodes could be placed and gap between them was adjusted by micrometer screws. Particle size was measured with a Differential Mobility Particle Sizer. Mean diameter was around 5 nm. Carrier gas was nitrogen.

have been looking at Don Smith, I feel he did the same, but he uses any HV low current device for the radiant input spike on a coil that is inductively coupled to 2 coils which are also coupled with each other and which generate an even higher voltage to be used against the earth ground instead of circuit ground, so unlimited amps are allowed, because there is no back mmf killing the source. Then I realized you use the back emf spike redirected with a diode for the same (high di./dt) which is quite a clever finding. Maybe you will reinvent the Don Smith circuit and effects using speaker wire instead of expensive coils like he did. :-) He said Tesla was his teacher.

I have come to one question. In all your circuits transistor switch is before the coil or resonant schematics. I thought coil or combination with capacitors should be energised with dc before circuit switch (transostor) closes (current flows). So I made same schematics with transistor close to negative terminal or after resonant schematics. Does it make sense?

thank you please dont stop this work

thanks

Good book

My thoughts about this one: 1. The velocity of propagation of a changing voltage level in a copper conductor is about 95% of the VoP of free space. 2. When the fast-rising Voltage is applied to the conductor, the voltage rise on the conductor is travelling at 95% of the speed of of the voltage rise in the free space surrounding the conductor. 3. The higher the voltage and the faster the rise-time, the greater the potential gradient between free-space and the surface of the conductor. 4. The radius of the conductor determines the E-field surrounding it: smaller radius = lower breakdown voltage of the surrounding free-space. 5. At the initiation point of the rising edge, the local e-fields are the same; the further away from the point of initiation, the delay of the voltage rise in the metal conductor will lead to an e-field strength high enough for a corona discharge between conductor and the surrounding air, further along the line. 6. For an infinite length of conductor and constant diameter, corona breakout will occur at regular intervals. 7. As the conductor concerned has a fixed length, transmission-line theory comes into operation. There will be reflections of the voltage rise, back and forth along the conductor, giving additive and subtractive products, that will cause the over-shoot that you see on the trace. The visible corona will appear at the same places whenever the system is energised. 8. These additive and subtractive products will explain why corona breaks out at seemingly random intervals along an apparently smooth, constant diameter wire. 9. I enjoy high voltage experimentation, please have a look at my you-tube channel! kzfaq.infovideos?view_as=subscriber

He does appear to be talking about what we'd usually refer to as plasma .. big square oscillations making a flame like presurizable radiant electricity.. like plasma. Very interesting.. good video, thanks.

I'm reading steinmetz his book as wel. About the spikes u refer to at 3:30, steinmetz does explain that when closing a switch on an inductive circuit, the coil must produce a voltage equal to the source voltage in order to keep i=0 at t0. Page 28 fig14. But these spikes are indeed not nearly as big as the ones for opening the switch. Ps: Thanks for the inspiring video's.

Light bulb moment. Keep it up ✊

Electricity used in people elevator Motor lifts are significant users of this lecture.

The overshoot pulse at turn on might seem perplexing at first. BUT every wire has some inductance even the wire connecting to your coil, switch it fast enough, and that small inductance will have an effect.

You also need to understand Ed Leedskalnin's "Magnetic Current". These hypertoroid rings are forming at the ends of chiral springs. Secondly, please understand an oscilloscope is giving a 2d representation of a 3d helical coaxial coil. Similar "poles" will push against each other and compress back on themselves and cause backfeed EMF. When opposite "poles" get close the springs will stretch out and intertwine with each other, much like vines, Birkeland currents, fluid dynamics (Alfven's magnetohydrodynamics). Also remember we exist in a fractal bifurcation system, a single source will always branch out in vortex fractal patterns to reach equilibrium. Examples include mandelbrot sets, lichtenberg patterns and fibonacci sequence. Each one of us is an example of this, and this also provides evidence of entanglement, coaxial transmission of power and information at FTLS between dipole nodes on a dedicated encoded link.

Maybe low voltage is OK, but if Eter is nonlinear or it has a threshold?

Benidis machine is a uni polar as you talk about and it captures what he calls a radient spike where the ether electric field acts more like gas or cloud

Are these impulses also related to the ball lightnings Nikola Tesla made?

Hey Ivo erg inspirerend ik ben ook het boek aan het lezen. Ben erg benieuwd naar je experimenten. Ben zelf al jaren bezig met mijn eigen onderzoek naar draadloze energy.

spark gap basicaly a capacitor that allowing to breakdown voltage.it depend what purposes it attach to, in other case for safety if there is over load inductive voltage it jump to lower coloumb

Have you ever heard of Agnew Bahnson's patents for his electro gravitics device from 1956? It seems to me he was using the same kind of pulsed fields. What I find also interesting was he had a toroid also that was hooked up to AC which looks to me like he was using that out of phase with the DC to create a Anapole like field. Where there is a poloidal electric field and the toroid creates a oscillating dipole, if you look up anapole modes and his patent you can see the similarity. He also had had counter rotating bifilare or filare plates that were shaped like a satellite dish facing down, he had both like that stacked on each other with a small distance between, Im wondering if that was to constantly having a moving phase, Im wondering what the effect would be. I think Bahnson's discovery's are important,

A laser is cohesive light. This could be di-hesive light. A oppesite (in some ways). but a resonance that sets up the standing wave.

@Master Ivo, at 17:25 you make a good point about not needing a high voltage to do these experiments, lower voltages do indeed allow for cheaper components and faster switching. But I want to engage you on the bit about Mr Tesla saying one of the things you can do is Up the Voltage, you say that is not necessary, because you say its more about setting the Ether in motion. Ok, so if Voltage represents tension in the Faraday Tubes as you explain in the other video, then Voltage does matter because as we can see in a Macro analog, a string vibrates differently the more tension you apply. The quickening of the switch is in my mind the plucking of the string. I believe that a different set Class of effects will arise as you climb the tension ladder. This ladder you also pointed to, this is the brevity of the switching, milisecond, nanosecond etc. I believe that these classes of switching represent different frequency bands of the Ether, thus different effects. I hope my counterargument makes sense enough for you to revisit your position by the least, I am interested in your opinion and findings please.

Very interesting it's almost as if it's an oscillating magnetic field that keeps fighting but then pulsating the voltage higher every time until reaching the 15V but that can't be true because a magnetic field is created by current unless some very interesting electron flow is happening ie a current is able to go in reverse on the surface while the majority of the electrons flow the way they're supposed to. Do you understand what I'm saying if not I'll try explain better?

Radiant energy just means light. Vassilatos is overcomplicating it for intrigue because he has more than a dozen books to sell. Tesla's radiant energy idea was to excite photoelectrons in a conductor. This could be used to charge a capacitor or more importantly amplify current in an inductor. Read the patents 685,957 and 958. The white spark is just a positive bias AC spark. That spark can appear on powerline on switching because the lines are positively charged by the electrostatic field when current is applied. A DC biased AC spark like a zinc or iron spark gap makes should be a good light for photo amplification. To make a radiant energy photo amplifier circuit, put a spark gap or x-ray tube by the inductor of a resonant circuit so the ionizing light is cast on the bare wire inductor. The light excites photoelectrons that amplify current in the inductor. The effect is short so it increases with frequency. It helps to give the wire a photoconductive cupric oxide surface coat by annealing. It's really that simple.

interesting, i will apply this knowledge into my mental rituals for manifestation, no resistance, no back and forth, just radiating without a push and a pull.

Maybe not necessarily high voltage but high energy (Joules vs. volts)...the disruptive discharge that vaporizes a wire as a consequence removes the counter pulse...one may have high energy at a low voltage as well as at high voltage...however since energy is proportional to V^2C then one must have great Capacity if using lower volts for same energy...of course it appears you are headed that direction which is a great place to start and not get hurt...great to see you develop before our eyes...thanks much

What came into my mind is smoke ring cannon. I think the sudden rush of unidirectional current created by voltage "pressure" creates vortex ring of aether. As Tesla said / imagine, -- in my interpretation -- the vacuum (aether) has some kind of gaseous properties composed of conductor (charge carrier) submerged in insulator (space). The sudden movement of charge (carrier) drags the aether to form vortex ring. The movement of gaseous (or liquid) vortex ring has distinct behaviour with laminar or turbulent flow. On the other side, common electromagnetic wave analogous to sound wave in gas (more likely laminar). Perhaps, that's why (with enough intensity) it can penetrate Faraday cage (more focused) and travels to longer distance without loosing energy -- compared to common electromagnetic wave.

I watched this on another device when i was signed out.. but came back today to comment. Thank you for reading this information and PROPERLY distinguishing pulsed DC vs AC... I have had conversations with engineers about this and they all dismiss pulsed DC or "impulse" as "AC voltage". I have tried to get them to listen and comprehend.. but a closed mind is a closed mind I guess. Anyway, this is EXCELLENT info! Keep up the great work! It is interesting how short the impulse needs to be for good effects. I am curious how Nikola measured these very short periods of time. Further, How would you suggest replicating this work given modern technology's capabilities. It seems like these impulse times would be feasible with transistor technology, provided the aetheric force doesn't blow the transistors.

It seems like the fallback of radiant energy is what actually induces the magnetic vortex we 'see' as magnetic fields around a conductor... So: Dielectric(radial propagation) -> radiant(volumetric field) --> magnetic field (vortex 'draining' of radiant volume)... we see this as current x voltage (pwr) in conductors.

it appears to be a reaction relative to the polarising impluse - the question is - what is the polarised element? - that may be an atomic reaction or a magnetic domain shift within the circuitry itself - impurities in the wire itself - see Tom Beardens writings.

Y dont u put a on of mosfet on the earthing as it acts like a compression or a make into a compressive wave at the rate u want to switch the compression similar to how u switch the dielectric with spark gap n tela coil... Compression ant secondary coil then run a tertiary resonant coil of these two nd c if power flows till I achieve 90 deg phase difference between these two.......

Do you have any videos on how to make a longitudinal bifilar coil. Not flat?

Hi, i have a question, how do you regulate heat generated by a vortex engine? Does the engine generate strong heat?

if one had a voltmeter with a sensitivity of 20k Ohms/V on the 5V range, measuring voltage across an large inductor in DC circuit with 1 Amp, an impulse with 100KWatts of power would explode the core of meter if the circuit were opened without a diode or capacitor(snubber) in reverse bias with respect to original current flow, in parallel with inductor. note that you can make high power diodes cheaply by using an aluminum cathode with steel or iron or probably zinc or lead, as anode, within a vessel of water with electrolyte added; also high power resistors with the same electrodes each, but resistance value will change as ions from anode go into solution.

At 3:20 When Tesla closed the (I am assuming DC High Volts >1000VDC) The Dielectric Field had to charged. Tesla was observing confirmation of Steinmetz's claim of a counterspace. I thank you for this video it was great.

diodes can create spikes due to charge being ejected from depletion layer during switch off. remove all diodes and check.

Around time 17:00 in the video you describe shortening the pulse and not needing higher voltage. We make use of the 3rd time derivative of position - we started doing this due to a late 1960s paper by Andrei Sakharov in which he specified "sudden departures from equilibrium" as a way to manifest effects. Our signal processing honors the fact that the Vacuum (the aether) is designed by Nature to quench any concentration of power. This design philosophy of ours permeates everything we do. Thermodynamics holds that all systems reach a "lowest energy equilibrium" condition - in other words, "Nature will quench away every attempt you make at creating some energy" I'm not saying we view this aspect of Nature as an adversary but it is inescapable that Nature will very quickly QUENCH your device's energy. So we honor that fact. And here is our signal processing design - this is just an example, these are hypothetical numbers: 1) first pulse is 10 volts with a pulse duration of 500 milliseconds 2) second pulse is 100 volts with a pulse duration of 50 milliseconds 3) third pulse is 1000 volts with a pulse duration of 5 milliseconds In effect, we are telling Nature "look - we understand you do not like suddenly-appearing concentrations of energy, and we know, Nature, that it is your job to seek a lowest-energy equilibrium in everything, and thus to quench our energy pulses. But we have a job to do. Our job is to manipulate the Vacuum (aether) so, I'm sorry, Nature but we are going to use the 'jerk' method of physics to overpower your attempts to quench our pulsing." If you look up "jerk (physics)" on wikipedia, the jerk is a physics term that is the 1st derivative of acceleration. It is an acceleration of acceleration - it is a rate of change of the rate of acceleration. A further signal processing is to apply different delay times between (1), (2) and (3) above. And also, to have as many as 10 steps, where each step increases the voltage and shortens the pulse duration. Using a computer program to alter these variable is the easiest way. And to your point, you can run tests and assess the results at low values of voltage/current before deciding whether to boost the magnitudes. We're trying to temporarily disable Nature's ability to undermine our pulses. A human analogy could be, a force of 10 men storm a fortress, and 20 Nature-men inside the fortress try to stop the 10 man force, and then 1000 men storm the fortress and overcome the 20 Nature-men. We are OVERWHELMING the ability of Nature to quench our pulses. Only temporarily of course. Even the strongest forces are reduced by Nature back to a lowest-energy equilibrium (even the A-bomb was quenched by Nature's equilibrium).

This is gunious best exponation by guy truly understand details thamk you for kind and best exponation to the detail truce , you are so awesom I try learn from you now on sir amazing your true understanding and demonstration wow 🙏. If any one really made overunuty device I can copy or use please Let me know sir ai bought so many BS over unity device scamed and burned up by other so call engenner But still searching over unity other than solar & wind sir.

I am really learning a lot from your videos! Thanks! Keep them coming ! Also where can I get this book?

Say I'm extremely interested in learning more about these sorts of electrical concepts. I haven't gotten' my mind into this area of thought for quite a while due to being overworked/overthought could anyone suggest a source for me to "get me rolling again"? my memory's a little fuzzy. Thanks.

Did the mosfet heats up when you add the load- bulb.

good work. it seems plasma physics can explain these phenomena. you must know thunderbolts project right?

He ment page "26" of the book and not "27". For preventing confusion :)

Ivo, how do you reconcile 'electron theory' and the theories of Tesla and Steinmetz- where Tesla stated that he did not believe that the electron was the source of the dielectric field? Also, Steinmetz worked in terms of the magnetic and dielectric components of 'electricity'. I have a hard time trying to marry the two approaches; modern electronics based on electron theory, and the works of the greats like Tesla and Steinmetz...

What is the difference between radiant energy and splitting the positive to get brilliant white cold electricity?

awesome! there were rumors that Tesla developed antigrav., his first machine was built out of a stove; they called it the flying stovepipe but described it's workings as what appears to me to be a preposterous mechanical contrivance, but apparently in actuality, it was supposedly what is known as MHD, only using high voltage AC combined with HV negative brush discharges from his generators/transformers and the air; nothing to do specifically with water that we commonly associate with MHD,

**PEOPLE INCLUDING TESLA (apparently?) ALWAYS UNDERESTIMATE GRADIENTS** A 'gradient' is some force that is stronger in area A, and still present but weaker in area B. EXAMPLE: Gravity is a gradient. The strong part, area A, is on the surface (actually towards the core but the surface stops you from being pulled by gravity closer to the core. UNLESS you dig a deep hole. Then you just exposed yourself to gravity's gradient some more.). The weak part of gravity, part B, is away from Earth, as you move into space. A gradient is a change - a gradual change - in a potential of energy, power, force. You 'feel' the gradient more, as you get closer to 'area A', the strong part of the gradient. Tesla's radiant energy is a GRADIENT. An electrostatic gradient. Some people don't believe that. I tell them "okay, I'm making a capacitor. I have one of the 2 capacitor plates ready. It is a 6 foot diameter piece of metal. Here, I've mounted the plate vertically, using a teflon post anchored in the ground. I have a 20 million volt generator that is connected to the plate, I'm gonna crank this baby up." "I need you to stand several feet away - let me know when you feel something." Only an idiot will stand anywhere near my 6 foot diameter metal plate. I tell such a person, "Hey, ah, forgot to mention -- the plate spikes to 100 million volts for about 1 millisecond when I switch the power on." If he's still standing there, I tell him "Okay, just one more thing. Because the 100 million volt spike only lasts one millisecond, I rigged up a resonant circuit that turns on power for a millisecond then shuts it off for a millisecond, and my 6' capacitor will spike to 100 million volts 500 times a second. If he's still there, more confessions, "Look - I've worked on this for a while and I know how to focus my gradient here -- did you notice the purposely symmetric, not-flat shape of my capacitor plate?" Anyway, NEVER underestimate a gradient. Another example: a magnet is a gradient field. Put your finger between two refrigerator magnets - no biggie. Stand in between two 20-Tesla electromagnets - those are massive, massive gradients. And they're 100% invisible. They will definitely be felt, far across a room. For example, MRI machines are 1 to 2 Tesla and it's forbidden to have metal objects in the MRI room. People have been killed by metal objects being sucked into the MRI tube. And the force, the danger, is 100% invisible. Never underestimate a gradient. . . .

how is radiant energy different from induction and Tesla coil ?, it look act and does pretty much the same thing

Imagine a rod made of a slightly elastic material, like a hard rubber. The rod is used to shove a heavy object. If the approach speed of the rod is high enough as it contacts the heavy object the tip of the rod will appear to swell as it contacts the surface of the object. Once the resistance of the object is overcome and it begins to move tip of the rod will once again assume it's original diameter. This is the spike when the voltage first encounters the resistance of the wires inductance. With high speed photography I imagine we would see a wave of the blue spikes travel along Tesla's wire.

If i may give some other advice, if you read Gerry Vasilatos book, you must also read Teslas own notes, you will find his work quite opposite to Gerry Vasilatos descriptions.

NUMBERS: (copy and paste from my files): 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, my gravity test has to be done which will help prove or disprove the TOE idea), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe (including 'space' which is energy itself, 'time' being the flow of energy), and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. (And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.). And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well. * While in bed one morning after a restful nights sleep, and assuming the above is correct, I mentally went 'inside' the 1 (the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself). I still saw with my mind the 3 different interacting modalities, the 6 maximum modality points, the '9' including and being the neutral points in the middle which faded into a 6 (as each maximum modality point came towards zero), that 6 fading into a 3 (as each modality came together), which turned into a 1 (which was the '0' point), but '0' wasn't zero. So, '0' is not really '0' but is something, not nothing. '0' is a relative '0'. But then here again, the zero point energy point is the maximum potential energy point for any and all modalities of the 'gem' photon. '0' is '1' and '1' is '0', this is the '1' inside the '1'. Now I just have to come up with some tests to test this idea of the zero point energy point being '1', a maximum potential energy point of the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself. The maximum potential energy point not really being potential energy per se, but the neutral point of kinetic energy. Tapping into here would be tapping into the 'zero' point energy point of eternally existent ever flowing energy. But then again, tapping into here, 'if' distorted what makes up space and time itself (assuming that 'space' is energy itself [the 'gem' photon] and that 'time' is the flow of energy), could it alter or even destroy the very fabric of space itself? What would occur if even only a single pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon were to explode? What potential ripple effects could occur with the rest of space and time? Hence also why I try to think some things all the way through so as to try to identify potential issues before the test. Unexpected, unintended, potentially dangerous or even deadly consequences. If nothing else, it keeps my mind active. The mind, use it or lose it, but using it could also lose it, permanently. (My own and other's). Putting the 'zero point energy point' into actual practice could be deadly. Warning: Proceed with Caution. The last words of human existence on this Earth might be, 'Hey it worked, ooooppppppsssssss.............'. * Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.

Can someone with more knowledge on the subject, comment on Tesla's radiant energy vs EMPs as at first glance they appear very similar in both effect and creation. Thanks in advance!

That's how the etheric field is propagated from source to every thing which recieves its " breath of life" which is the pulsed electromagnetic frequency which charges the cells of all things. That what the research into PEMF is divulging at present. The ancients knew this very well.

It immediately occurred to me that a disruptive discharge is analogous to a thin stream of viscous fluid being poured onto a plate. Think of honey on your pancakes, a thin stream will stack up and fold onto itself because the viscosity slows down the expansion of potential. Higher viscosity, slower fluid leveling. I think much can be learned from this analog

Tune in to NATURE!

My personal thought's! Radiant energy from a flat earth perspective! The plasma energy from above the dome that pulses like a heartbeat creating our seasons! The Sun and Moon are positive and negative emanations of the plasma energy from above through the convex dome lens! The + & - emanations create energy tides like static electricity on steroids! Tuning of frequencies is crucial to optimize any potential!

Radiant electricity must be what Stanley Meyer used to split H2O to run his car on water.

I have been reading tesla everyday for years. Especially the Westinghouse bankruptcy transcripts. The radiant patent won’t work with out a spark gap. Tesla clearly put the spark gap in the patent. What he didn’t mention in the patent is the frequency necessary to unlock radiant energy. Tesla mentioned static electricity is not that static,it vibrates at around 1 million per second, or one could say the resonant frequency of backround energy is @ 1 million per second. Tesla said electrons are emitting very small quanta’s of matter that have exceptional charge. He also said there is an insulating fluid that keeps all radiant matter from combining, creating ever larger potentials of voltage and current. To break down that insulating fluid, a longitudinal wave must be employed(a spark), and the frequency must hit resonance of about 1 million per second. When that is achieved, a simple conductive plate will start charging up with out stop. It can be a comparably small plate, as the potentials are off the scale, as far as traditional measuring goes. It took a long time to figure this out, but it seems obvious now. Tesla was always speaking on getting a spark with the lowest energy practicable. To that end , he invented a quenched spark gap that he put into a vacuum, and used metals with less resistance, like silver.

Fluid dynamics are being clearly referenced by tesla

Your on the money I just want you to know your not alone just finished my nuclear secondary stage nuclear decontamination recycling plant thanks to Tesla and Niels Bohr

And what if atmospheric pressure was created by the discharging of this radiant energy across the planet.

I have read all those Tesla quotes

5:40 thats superposition

corona discharge? Baybe tesla was describing something like that.