Hahahahahaha

wtf??what do you mean

@@arhaanahmed2299 It is a joke.

@@Red-ding-Ton but jokes have meaning🤪this joke had run through my head🤧

I just spotted her from USA 8431 miles away!

Not sure if that was a pun or not but there's literally 1000's of videos just like this one on KZfaq.

Will you buy it?

If you want to be creative and versatile, the P1000 isnt really a good choice... - no (or at best a poor) bokeh with this type of lens and aperture possible - just fine for daylight and outside, probably an AWESOME travel camera if you want to have ultimate zoom for every situation, but the P1000 is pretty much fked up in low light conditions - lens quality, its selling point, the 100 or 125x zoom lens, as nice the zoom is, its quality is WEAK. Saw an in depth comparison, and for normal photos and wider angles its just fine, but pretty fast when zooming in, the image quality drops heavily (and only getting worse). Not that i dont like this camera, in fact for some of my usecases i would LOVE IT (like birds, wildlife at all) and it would be also better than my full frame mirrorless camera with a 300mm tele lens (also more expensive than the P1000,...), but the overall performance of this camera suits only very specialized usecases at this price point like if you want superb tele capabilities but are ok with poor IQ for a "good" price. Sadly for regular photography there is no way around any modular system if you want to play around with aperture and bokeh especially. Trust me if i tell you you can have with a 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 prime lens more fun than with a 2000$ "holy trinity" lens setup, and like this a DSLR/Mirrorless is A LOT SMALLER than any of this hyperzoom bridge cameras like the P1000

I agree. The Nikon P1000 camera has a narrow, specific application.

@@MrSuperMoleI wish I could afford one…

@@MarylandballProductions ditto

Es mejor la Panasonic FZ80 😅no pierde calidad cómo está basura de Nikon 😅😅

Yes :)

​@@MrSuperMole Have u compared it to images from a telescope .. Would u be able to do that experiment ..? Becuase the nokon migjt be using some algortithm for digital zoom as well... Maybe thats why it coildnt read past the 3.8 km mark..the digital zoom applies the algortithm to only the light sognals it receives on the sensor ..

I agree :)

Just set up a sign yourself..

@@randybaumery5090 Sigma

I just found my pee pee

😂😂😂

It’s the air. Air isn‘t 100% transparent due to dust and humidity. The further away an object is the more air is between you and the object, thus making it appear in this blueish and less saturated colour

What Yannick said. The problem, including for telescopes, is that you don't just magnify the object in the distance. You also magnify the movement in the air as well. That is why there is a shimmer in the magnified image. In a very hot climate this gets so bad it can be impossible to get a clear shot on a hot day. Combine that with the density of the air plus dust and other particles in the air, and you get degradation in the magnified image. There is no practical way around this for any camera mere mortals can afford. Large scientific observatories spend millions on using laser beams to measure air movement, and then computers can control servo motors to continually adjust the telescope mirror which eliminates the shimmer, but the loss of color is combatted by filters and shooting in selective wavelengths then recombining the image later to get true color by calculating how much color was removed by the air. Hand held cameras simply cannot do any of this, and the result is what you see here.

And the bluish color of distant trees is caused by the increased amount of UV rays, because the video was shot in a mountainous area, around 1000m above sea level.

@@artistjoh Dzięki za wytłumaczenie zwykłemu śmiertelnikowi

Fr

Witaj. Tutaj używałem zwykłego statywu Genesis ABT kit. Do innych filmów używam sterowanego elektrycznie statywu Sky-watcher AllView. W kilku moich filmach go nawet widać :)

Its the camera. That was the whole point of the video.

@@eighteenfiftynine that was my very first contact with a camera like that, so I was just amazed and couldn’t believe it, that this was just the camera without any addition. That is why I asked about it, it was something I never was interested about, until this video. So thanks for you answer and help 🌹

عاشو اهل الرقه

@@alt3bmnsy تسلم يا طيــب

Wartości mierzone były za pomocą wskazań GPS oraz przez aplikację Google Earth. Podane wartości mają dokładność około 20-50metrów (są zaokrąglone). Jedynie pierwsza odległość jest bardzo dokładna.

😃

If you know anything about cameras you will know that its absolutely normal to get noisy in dark environments

@@SolidBlueBlocks does this happens with all cameras?

@@blertonbakija8811 Yes, but some perform better than others. The low light performance is dependent upon how much noise there is when going high with the iso settings. Some cameras get noisy at iso 400 already, some more expensive ones keep clean until something like 3200. Try learning what your camera can do and shoot in manual mode to keep the iso low

As said by this utuber regarding the distance not near-distance, it is like telescope than a camera. So night vision is not good. For me, Telescope is ultimate in zoom lens not optic. Night vision is good with zoom optic

Personally if you just want to photograph the Moon the p1000 is a little Overkill you can get away with the p950. I find myself not really missing the extra thousand millimeters.

As a P950 user, the lowlight performance is non-existent. Just use it during the daytime or with proper lighting

The camera sensor is the same size as that of mobile phones. In low light it works very poorly :(

I love mine

Thanks :) I used a Genesis ABT tripod for this film. To this I added a Manfrotto 500ah oil head. A very stable set that facilitates work with this camera.

I used the Genesis ABT Kit tripod

Astronomers use multiple shots, them stack them.

The dust in the air and lights and stability and water in air and blah blah, pretty much everything

Tripod :) You can find the stabilization test without a tripod here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbiTadGkzJbPqnk.html