Lol юпитер россия

@@katastroff6011 7нроргг89гш77 в 6 и

Where can i get the sky watcher allview mount ?

Music name please

Hello there fellow friend. Did you find this planets on the sky in mainly the same area where you would find them during nighttime ? Was this filmed in the morning ? Thank you

Hahahaha... Just love your profile 😅😅😅

You can apply special program to track down the objects

I've definitely skipped one, when I saw Saturn's rings. Just wow.

They seem no so far at all :)

@@hollow.mp4 Yes, just a stone throw away

When did u think u could see them at nighttime

​@@cajunking3094 Er... yes, because they reflect sunlight. We see planets in the night sky all the time but most people mistake them for stars. Just like the OP I'd never seen or heard it was possible to see Jupiter clearly by day, and I've watched pretty much every respectable documentary series about the universe. I'm even not entirely convinced this video is real. Not saying it isn't. Just saying it's a lot to take in and I am sceptical of all things posted on the internet with good reason.

...and through cloud! I had no idea

@@ImagezAndWords Yeah indeed, another thing that baffled me and still makes me doubt if it's really real.

@@Kris_Aalst Jupiter's max apparent magnitude is about -3 which is like young and old Moon. It's no surprise for you to see the Moon in daylight isn't it? ;)

What magnification was it

@@zurnna8642 2×

Even more astounding is that Gallileo actually also saw Jupiter's moons in 1610. I have no idea how they could achieve this precision then.

😀😀

lol

lol indeed, I suggest you watch fewer movies.

Lofl. Rotflmao. Hilarious.

lmfao lol yikes boomer lolololololol

It's not that hard bro even you can see the planets in my town . Even Venus is visible to the naked eye here

Now a days due to pollution and hazy atmosphere it's hard to spot them, but if you live at elevated places you can spot them but it's hard.

@@deadlytsg2792 Venus is very visible to most places, especially in the night where it shines the brightest sometime.

@@chrishandsome3388 he said meters

@Sabin Sesumariyan Destroyed in minutes 😂

Then you see the ocean of stars, literally

@@smoklares9791 I have seen that and boy, it's horrifying AND beautiful 😲

Farwah Batool howd you see that

@@safwanstar4850 cloudless night, away from light pollution

@@safwanstar4850 there was one night when we had power break down across the whole country. That night, we saw that scene. It felt like the sky (hanging stars, glass shards) would fall down on us 😅

Saturn isn't a star

@@TheChrisglasgow pretty sure they know that. it just so happens that while they were looking for stars, they stumbled upon saturnn

@@TheChrisglasgow no shit sherlock

@@TheChrisglasgow You must be a hoot at dinner parties.

@@TheChrisglasgow @@@$ hole does it matter whatever it is. These are just empty words. Stars, planets, Pussycat, all these are just empty words. We don't know a shit about anything and we are fighting over empty words.

i haven't seen them at night-time yet :(

​@@MarkWhichI do and it's amazing

Same here

Same

Believe it or not, light pollution doesn't actually affect planets due to how close they are and the fact that theyre reflecting directly off our solar systems star as opposted to stars which are all way beyond comprehensible distances

@@jacobjohnson6766 actually, 365 million miles.

@@jacobjohnson6766 some of us use kilometers...

Saturn: "It's not my fault that I need a little TIME, to show you my brightness..."

Not my fault I was born so bright.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA what a original joke that I've never seen before, I've never laughed so much, oh my the humor on youtube is beyond great.

"Personally"? no, it should be "Planetally"

Right 👍

I bought a telescope this summer and can view the sky through my slanted windows on the top floor. I did not regret my decision for one second! There is no comparison to seeing these objects live with your own eyes. Even on successive nights I would watch the same planets and moon, even though they looked just the same as the day before.. 😅

@@joostdriesens3984 Last summer? :D

CG = Coingecko

@Miles Doyle You should repent for unsolicited proselytising.

And still some people believe that the Earth is Flat. If the Earth is Flat then the Planets are on their sides.

All of the Zooms.

All you need is a telescope like that one. They were invented 100's of years ago.

Ah, okay. If Nikon invented that 100 years ago, so what they have today? Telescope itself is older than 100y. Where you write the line what is real telescope is interesting to know.. And that tube needs tricks of digital to get that superior.

@The Crazy Amateur Runner what you mean? He's saying it was the closest it has been to earth in 60,000 years. 58 million miles away.

Mars is closer than that, you probably meant kilometres

@@seanb9698 yep just checked it out. 2003 was closest at 55 million kilometres. Was the closest for 60,000 years. Won't be that close again until the year 2287.

@@seanb9698 my bad. Kilometres. I leave the mistake. I’ll own that. Cheers.

@The Crazy Amateur Runner Lol. So some arbitrary limit on distance then is your choice? What is the distance? What do you run into? Is there nothing making up whatever that thing is you run into? Just a magical wall?

I'm happy humans can't reach this planets.

And you actually believe it’s a planet you can walk on that you see in the video? You really believe that camera zoomed in on an object supposed to be flying through space at a distance of 812 million km for Jupiter? I bet you, it’s not a planet and it’s not 821 million km away from us. It’s right there where you see it when you zoom in. Nothing crazy there. If you take this crazy camera and go to a lake big enough to have curvature (sounds stupid to all those who know hahah) and you zoom in on the distant shore that you can’t see with your naked eye, I promise you the shore will appear and reveal no curvature. And it shows that your “planets” just can’t be that far away if a camera can achieve these high levels of zoom and produce those pictures. What do you need big space telescopes for when you can just go into your backyard and zoom in on the stars at night!! That will reveal something much more amazing to you than being like “oh wow there I see this circle in the sky, better believe it’s a world where things are happening” like what?? It’s all happening down here. Open your eyes.

​@@leonstreubel A shore and planet are so far apart it's not even something you can really compare. A telescope allows people to view further than what's in this video. MUCH. Further.

Stop dreaming those planets are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay distant to be reachable within your lifespan. Space is empty and huge, like beyond our concept of the word big.

@@TheTruthF98 Why? Even if we could reach those two planets we could never go to the surface of them. The pressure would be too great, not to mention the radiation.

Except they aren’t close at all. Maybe relatively speaking.

You like empty places? "Only about 0.0000000000000000000042 percent of the universe contains any matter. The universe is a pretty empty place!"

Yes! Imagine if humanity could space travel between these plants with ease though, the value of appreciation of the knowing of these planets would fall drasticly, but atm, we cant, so seeing them is mind melting for us.

@@croissantlover1 We would start gazing at other things in the universe that are slightly out of reach. Until technology picks up again.

The other day I was watching the almost new moon with my telescope. Most of the moon is then very dark. Through the telescope it looked like a giant ball levitating in the sky, just bound to us by the laws of physics but nothing else. Astronomy can be unnerving at times. And all the movements and orbits aren't even that stable in our solar system, things will change. Just not at a timescale that is relevant for us :-)

@@croissantlover1 Never going to happen. I wish what I said wasn't true.

Good observation. Some of us don't think it's that far away either. It's just a light in the sky...not a body millions of light years away

I remember my first time too. Using a reflector telescope that I got for Christmas years ago. I remembered seeing what looked like a bright star but noticed that it was more oval shaped than round. Then I spotted the rings and was truly shocked

I don’t have any high-end telescopes, etc. so I haven’t seen Saturn yet but I will Never forget the night I spent with my dad a few years ago.. It was at the time when Mars was very close to earth and you could see it with your eyes. We used my dads binoculars and I was blown away.

@@annika_27 doesn't need to be high end. My scope was £100 and I spent another £50 on some extra lenses and you can make it out enough to be impressed. First time I saw it was 4am having waited up all night for it to rise. Best moment ever

It's only camera with ...3000mm Zoom. But telescopes can actually do better

This isn't really a powerful telescope. I have telescopes that I keep in my apartment that are way more powerful than this camera. (And they are a lot cheaper, too).

@@beta_cygni1950 Can you name them? I’m actually looking forward to buy some.

@@KuwabaraTabo It depends on what you want to look at. Different scopes are best suited for different things. There is NO "one size fits all" option. That is why I own several types! Planets & doubles? A longer focal length refractor on an equatorial mount will be great. Larger open clusters? A shorter focal length scope (probably a reflector) capable of less magnification & larger field of view. Fainter deep space objects? A large aperture reflector on a dobsonian mount is prob best. Remember: Magnification is the LEAST important thing in a telescope!!! You will usually observe between 20x and 100x (at the most!). About the only times it makes a difference is when you're looking at planets like mars, Jupiter, and saturn. Also... besides the optics, one of the most important things isn't the telescope's itself. Its the mount. An equatorial mount will allow you to track things at higher powers, but should be A LOT beefier than the scope you put on it (word to the wise: MOST of the cheaper EQ scopes you'll see... even from reputable companies... will undersell the mount that they will pair with their scope. Eventually, you'll want to upgrade. The EQ mount should cost more than the scope itself). A dobsonian mount will be cheaper and lighter. But you wont get the tracking that you'll want for planets, etc. But will be great for larger scopes to watch DSOs at lower magnifications.

Yup and no matter how much proof there is of the universe ppl will still refuse to accpet that this is real.

LOL YEA IMAGING OF LIGHT DEFINITELY DICTATES YOUR NOT IN A DOME AT ALL EVEN THO YOUR PHYSICAL REALITY STATES YOUR TRAPPED IN A BUBBLE !!!!!!!!! BUBBLE BURSTERS !!!!!! WHO CANT ESCAPE BUBBLE REALITY !!!!!!!

Wouldn't that direction heavily depend on your latitude and the time of day?

@@nitrox5915 Yes, of course, that's all to consider and it's not that simple. However, seeing more than one planet in the sky helps to perceive the ecliptic line.

In high school we had an awesome physics teacher and he would invite us to his house and let us use his really expensive telescope , it was so much fun:)

The earth is a flat plane not the universe. That shits a joke, y'all laugh at the thought of a flat earth but gladly accept a flat universe? Lol y'all forget about the swirling balls of BS spinning around the sun in a vortex? Eric Dubay owns globe tards

You see them cos the earth is flat. The blue sky is still behind Saturn after maximum zoom. ))

@@user-pk2lc5rv3i _"You see them cos the earth is flat."_ You see them because they are there, and no, the Earth is not flat. Educate yourself. _"The blue sky is still behind Saturn after maximum zoom"_ The "blue sky" is not behind Saturn, it's between us and Saturn.

@@Teeb2023 You are just brainwashed.

@@user-pk2lc5rv3i No, just learned and experienced in astronomy and astrophotography. Sorry if that doesn't jive with your KZfaq-fueled ignorance.

@@Teeb2023 there's no experience in globe model to prove the globe. While the flat earth model has lots of proofs

It is called a colonoscopy.

@@daisaigaming6836 the future is now.

are you from the 90's

@@sinchanrai2024 He is from 1998.

Thank you, everyone, please do not fight. There is place for everything in life. The science does not exlude the religion and vice versa.

This camera isn't that costly at $900

@@YashTrivedispaceport6492 dude that's a fuck ton of money for a camera

@@YashTrivedispaceport6492 that's more than a whole week's pay for most people

@@drampz_ wow, imagine if it was more than a months pay.

@@MrOrangeonion I literally can not

Mam tak samo :)

Thank you :)

@@MrSuperMole ☺️🇲🇽

What? You can buy one now. The view to the human eye at the eyepiece is far superior to this.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver I meant way back when they first started making telescopes to see the stars, i.e. Galileo himself and... Aristotle? They made those things so accurate they could discern planet movement without the need to have special equipment. Just simple drawn pictures and patience on a monthly scale.

@@raineyoung3291 Galileo made his own telescope in 1609 based on Hans Lippershey's invention of the time. Galileo's telescope suffered chromatic aberration so badly it would not sell as a toy today. (Aristotle lived almost two thousand years before the telescope was invented.) You can see planets move relative to stars from night to night, and week to week or month to month, just with your eyes. Galileo did note the four bright moons of Jupiter as they orbit the planet, yes. My little 9-power aiming scope attached to my main telescope shows me what Galileo saw! This video was made with a camera attached to a telescope and then the recorded images washed through computer software. I can attest that the view live and in real time at the eyepiece is (on a clear night) amazing more than any photo.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver The Greeks and Romans had simple telescopes. The Apostle Paul makes a reference to seeing objects far away through a glass darkly.

@@codetech5598 The term 'glass' meant a mirror in those times: looking-glass. The first telescopes were made with a pair of lenses ground and polished to precision shape. No such technology available to Greeks and Romans 1500 years before--and certainly not part of the anti-knowledge Christ cult.

That wasn’t Saturn. You need very powerful optics to even see Saturn on a clear night. It was likely Jupiter. Jupiter is the brightest object in the night sky after the Moon and Venus.

@@JasonB808 you can see Saturn with your bare eye though it looks like an usual star.

@@sebastianszalek6345 naked eye* 😁

@@markshaw270спасибо, может быть накэд

@@sebastianszalek6345 in Europe at least

😐🥺🧐same age 😃

I know :D

Thank you very much :) Dziękuję bardzo :)

Yes, telescopes can see the sky. Get out more.

This is literally how Galileo discovered Saturn, he took a telescope and pointed it at the sky.

why?

Astro statyw z systemem GoTo bardzo pomógł, ale i tak musiałem trochę korygować ręcznie :) Pozdrawiam.

Stellarium też pomoże za dnia namierzyć jeśli nie widać gołym okiem

:)

Dobrze wierzyć w bajki 😳😂🤦‍♀️