For sure

Send me your CV 😎

i mean it sometimes feels like they already did lol

yea

True

It's with adrenaline software, so AMD only. But I'm sure that modders will be very fast with dlss2fsr analog with FSR 3.

yeah but it's still "fake" performance

@@Efemische that is the fluid motion,or frame generation tech, not the fsr 3 which is like dlss

@@qbasic16 not really i played rd2 with 50 to 55 fps on medium to high settings on a flipping gtx 1650 laptop, without fsr the game was unplayable

@@qbasic16 ill take it, even if it mean to put on fake muscle on my R7 370.

Not just competition, but a sense of loyalty and gratitude to consumers. I've seen corporations try and nickel and dime their customers before. A famous example was Microsoft trying to prevent people sharing their owned games with friends. Sony were quick on their feet and made them look stupid. These companies need to realise that good consumerist policies are often rewarded.

"Loyalty and gratitude to consumers" You actually believe companies care about consumers? Capitalist brainwashing at its finest. 😂

​@@religion_is_bullshitthat's the AMD fanboys mindset, don't question it, especially on this channel

@@religion_is_bullshit Even if their intentions aren't pure. The effect is still beneficial to consumers. I'm as skeptical as the next guy but you can't deny that allowing new software to function on old hardware is a pretty cool move even if it's a chess move against Nvidia for revenue purposes. Either way AMD wins and so do the people who enjoy the products of a capitalist society. What capitalist product have you used to express your anti-capitalist rhetoric?

I dunno man. Compared to the late 90's early 2000's renaissance of GPUs with more than 3 chip manufacturers, today is still a joke. We are just a bunch of battered and abused housewives that we actually believe small concessions like this are monumentally great or indicative of change when they are not.

Great for 7900xt/7900xtx owners or maybe other 7000 series AMD card owners.

I'm back at it. Wanted to build a PC for couple years now but the miners ruined it. Now with the prices coming back to earth....this alone is enough...on principle...to buy amd hardware.

@@wadebrewer7212 Intel CPUs are good but draw far too much power now. 7800X3D has decent performance in games. Just get 32GB of DDR5 RAM at a decent frequency.

@charlesclarke7790 I have always liked AMD for their processors...pushing limits and they are outside the box. The integrated graphics in with CPU was always intriguing to me. Seems that has unfortunately gone to the way side of things. I hope those come back soon....they seemed like a really good stop gap for folks trying to get into pc gaming but couldn't afford a decent GPU at the time. Also great for SFF builds. Interesting fact....VBA in excel uses a lot of GPU resource to run complicated script. At times some of the stuff I've built/written struggles on the standard business desktop machines but rubs fine on my rtx 3070 machine (also run cad at work and is why my computer over others is iver spec) found out about the GPU resources and VBA when we attempted to move a VERY heavily scripted workbook to a server where the "gpu" resource is shared across RAM amd the CPU...basically, 8mb of GPU resource was allocated to each user and the workbook all but refused to run most of the time. Surprisingly....watching resources on my 3070 machine, it would at times spike to about 40% gpu while running long, heavy VBA.

@@GodKitty677it’s for all graphics cards

Only if devs implement it.

it's very normal, companies decide on purpose to abandon older products to force you to buy more stuff :(

​@@6884Nvidia does it, I like more AMD.

Except the most important feature FG

@@TheGam3Br3akeR They did say it might not work someone already did it with the 1060 and 1070 and it works just fine. AMD just said that due to unforeseen incompatibility like but this is an open source software. If amd effed it up the community will try to fix it. That's both pros and cons of their open source

How does this generate them more money though? Giving more performance to old products is not a savvy business decision. There has to be a catch.

@@Felale catch is destroying the NVidia marketing so consumers won't buy their RTX40xx cards

@@Felale Reducing Nvidia GPU market share. Even if they don't maximize their profit off of this specific tech, the action itself can generate a net total larger profit in gained shares of the GPU market.

@@FelaleAMD latency reduction for FSR3 is locked to 7000 series. You can enable all the fake frames with horrible latency on all the other cards.

@@givikap120 Except fsr 3 works on nvidia video cards. So why buy amd when you can get Nvidia's features and amd's features at the same time?

I got a 5800x3D recently and its a glorious cpu, although wish I could take better advantage of it since I still have a 1070 lol. Can't wait to get rid of that card and the driver issues it has.

They don't care what you remember or not. They care if you buy their GPUs and CPUs

​AMD is atleast trying while Intel & Nvidia doesn't even care.

Ryzen launched in March 2017 but I wholeheartedly agree. I got my first AM4 board in early May of that year and I'm still using it! So glad I didn't go for the 7600K instead.

I've been a long supporter on intel. Changed to amd, got the 5800x3d...can't go back...EVER!

Berserk reference

Nvidia has abandoned the consumer gpu market anyway.

berserk reference

AMD did nothing wrong ...

This must be were all the AMD fanboys gather 😂

FSR literally just an algorithm based frame gen, any card can run it, so the true sentence is AMD not disable it for nvidia users.

@@bence2345 and make it open source for some nerds help them,

How is that smart for AMD lol you think AMD giving its best feature to nvidia cards is smart for AMD... that must be why AMD have so much market share huh... oh wait no. Open source anything is turning out to be a strategic disaster for AMD, they are giving customers absolutely no reason to need or want their cards. Imagine if this situation was the other way around and Nvidia announced that they were allowing all AMD users to now use DLSS, it would be the stupidest thing Nvidia had ever done, AMD users would laugh their ass off - basically telling AMD users you dont need our cards you can use our features on your AMD card lol does that sound smart? well thats exactly what AMD are doing. Nvidia dont care AT ALL that some users are sticking with older cards, they have the market share and more importantly the mind share of those users, when they upgrade - the likelihood of them upgrading to another nvidia card is massive because nvidia still has the exclusive features and AMD are giving all their features to Nvidia for free lol smart smart. The actual smartest thing AMD did was announce the ability to use a lesser form of FSR at the driver level on their cards which you can switch on in any dx11/12 game, THAT is the smartest thing they did. Suddenly there is a reason to think about buying an AMD card instead of Nvidia because FINALLY there is something an AMD card can do that an Nvidia card cant... for the time being, and do you see what the difference is... its not open source, you cant use it on older cards and you cant use it on nvidia cards. Stop singing the praises of open source rubbish, you think it benefits everybody but its killing AMD, we clap for them today and then go and buy an Nvidia card tomorrow. They need exclusive features!

@@jinx20001 All you basically needed was this line as it's strong enough to stand on it's own. "We clap for them today and then go and buy an Nvidia card tomorrow."

@@jinx20001 i don't know man. the 10 series still dominating steam hardware survey of the most used GPU. if AMD disturb the upgrading process. by making people not upgrade. that kinda only hurt nvidia.

Depends what competition.

@@IrrationalDelusion are there any product competition that will harm the customer?

cartels, lol@@amogoose2971

@@amogoose2971 If companies compete for becoming more premium or becoming more monopolistic(monopoly vs monopoly) it can have negative impact. “General ideas are a limitation of human intellect” - words of Alexis De Toquivelle, observer of birth of modern democracy.

Competition doesn't exist as you think it does. It's mostly an illusion to fuck you over harder. All the big players are teamed up and are just pretending they're enemies.

if they bring it to driver level, nvidia will quite literally be a joke to buy

Like FSR has driver level support. Which is just FSR1 because it's a post-processing effect that doesn't need engine data like motion vectors. The same will be true for "FSR3" via hyper RX so it will be a very different version of motion interpolation. More akin to what your TV does. Which I'm not saying is pointless but if people complain about a bit of ghosting or artifacting in current DLSS/FSR implementations, they're gonna absolutely hate hyper RX.

just for the 7000 series

they still haven't brought fsr to driver level for vega 56. meaning u have to lose freesync to run it

@@cakedon driver level frame interpolation is gonna suck, get ready for a ghosting fiesta

They have a trillion $ in total net worth and are the top 5 companies in the world. Intel isn't on this list

we are =/= were . You are illiterate.

Well, we keep buying their overpiced stuff so why shouldn't they become more and more arrogant realizing how easily they get away with that?

@@Ludak021 You are illiterate, "we're" = we are. Unless your being pedantic about the apostrophe.

​@@aaroncruz9181only because of their bs "ai" conference, where they pushed everything towards ai. They're overvalued and their products are severely overpriced

Probably not gonna use fsr over dlss on my card

probably none cares@@MaksKuaka

​@@MaksKuakaI have a 3060 so I definitely will use it. Big thanks for AMD

@@MaksKuaka well fair if you have a nvidia gpu dlss is better than fsr admittedly but supporting those who actually need that technology is far more important

@@MaksKuaka I had 2060s and will use Fsr 3.0 instead of dlss for frame generation that NVIDIA only gave for 40series card

not a couple years (points to remenant II claiming its been made with upscaling in mind). it really shouldn't be compulsory to make a poorly optimised game to run. It should be a benefit for anyone on a old gpu whos struggling to run their games at playable framerates - especially with how expensive graphics cards are these days

i think this is what all developer actually want? 😂 makes the games but leave the optimization to FSR

@@UltimateChocoWy1 This is sadly happening already, with Remnant 2 being the case. Remnant 2 is a great game just poorly optimized. We want games to run better in native without the use of Upscalers, regardless of who you side with AMD or Nvidia. Better optimization is better in the long run rather than upscaling.

thats actually what i was thinking. So many games were brought out with poor optimization in the last 2-3 years... hogwarts legacy was one of it e.g. A really nice game but duo to its frame rate drops, it sometimes was unplayable or at least unenjoyable because it took the entire immersion and not only once here and there. Many guessed it was due to certain release dates they had to aim for. well, since you can literally just increase performance now by pressing one button, publishers wont have any pressure anymore releasing a finished product, since the players will more likely accept it, if they can compensate it theirselves...@@MaxRei_Xamier

​@@MaxRei_Xamierallen wake 2 also

but the moment their CPUs became as good or better than Intel's they started gutting us. don't be mistaken, they're not our friends, they're just the underdog in the GPU market and this is the only card they can play.

@@Amfibios You can keep your nearly $2k Nvidia card any day. FANBOY!

@@Meldium okay, if you want to be like that mate you can use your shitty amd card with fsr. All Nvidia RTX cards will be able to use DLSS 3.5

@@Meldium AMD's CPUs and motherboards are literally more expensive than Intel's. It seems you're so bent over for AMD that you can't see the truth anymore.

They're absolutely right though. Also before you call me an Nvidia fanboy my system is all AMD and half the gpus I've ever had have been AMD I just don't kid myself into thinking that AMD are the good guy and can do no wrong like crazy fanboys like you do.@@Meldium

5 people who bought it 😂😂😂

You'd be surprised by how many people are getting gaming laptops with the 4060m lol, kinda coz it's pretty much the best value for money (I know, I know) GPU that isn't very different than the desktop variant, and 4070s are just way too expensive

@@mihirojha4475 so 8 people? Wow that’s kinda a big difference

@@SordidusFellatio yup, a 60% increase is pretty big 😉

*Cries inside*

I mean adrenaline is stable AF on red cards.. imagine how stable it would be working with nvidia cards🤣 as AMD user my condolences to U 💔

And then there's me... With an AMD CPU and an Nvidia GPU 😅 Edit: How did this comment blow up lmao

@@HT79 same🤣

@@HT79 7800x3d +4090, best of both worlds. :P

same lol @@HT79

They're like we can't out sell you, but we can convince people to stop buying your shit and thus knee cap you to our level of sales 🤣

fsr3 looks shit

Do note, this does not mean FSR3 will not work with other and slower GPUs, it is simply not recommended and optimized. Graphics cards such as GTX 10 and lower will also support FSR3 upscaling, but not the frame generation technology. -AMD

I should have bought AMD anything at this point , not my laptop with rtx 3050 4 freaking GB thinking they're going to be optimising for it.

You are forcing AMD users to not buy 7000 cards too lmao

Exactly and I am glad that amd is always the one who is breaking the rules to achieve the best to get more consumers and offer alot more than just plain stuff that other "Premium brands" are offering..

Because it allows AMD to lie about a performance increase that doesn't exist? You can do this already by lowering the resolution.

​​@@Wylie288lol. Bruh. It is lower resolution and then upscale. The best part is upscale. That mean lower you resolution but doesn't change the visuals too much.

people will just buy rtx and get both,how does this help amd,i take amd because i pretty much like everything about it the name,the design of the card the software the red/black aura i can sacrifice power for it and i never buy the most expensive thing,but people would get nvidia since it's the most powerfull gpu anyway,how does this help amd??

@@ogaimon3380 because people are able to wait longer to buy a GPU which means lower sales numbers. Steam survey already shows that barely anyone uses AMD GPUs.

Yep, that will be game changer and imagine how big it is for Xbox Series S too.. right now it's mental how you can run all of that games for 250 bucks, but with fsr3 it will be even more bizzare..... Everyone can play everything, we are living the gaming dreams and our children will be able to experience every masterpiece of a game even if we don't have big salary

Yup steam deck users rejoice!

It already happen with fsr2 on switch

FSR3 will definitely be supported on the Steam Deck. Also if AMD is able to enable frame generation for all DX11 and DX12 games, it is likely possible for the open-source community to bring that to every game running via Vulkan - which means on Linux pretty much every game out there, since you can run any DirectX game or even OpenGL game through Vulkan layers on close to native performance. Should be pretty epic... so if FSR3 is good, I would expect Valve to implement it as a toggle into their SteamOS UI on the Deck.

So fsr works on 2021 cpu 5600g?

Same dude i have rx 6500 xt but even i am happy 💀

Not even just that, but, like brother, AMD. What am I supposed to render with here, is it all about games? Is that all we do here, is play games? Look, im sure the cards are great, but, if I can't render, make realtime edits, and export media in a timely fashion, im not into it. I want one that does both. Until then, I plan on sticking with Nvidia. Don't get me wrong or personal to anyone that sees this or wants to reply. I knew guys that ran these cards, 6800XTX's or something like that, and they PREFORMED. But, they couldn't handle Blender at all, Premiere Pro suffered harshly in export times. Just wish there was more to offer with AMD GPU's because, obviously the technology is here, they are just expanding in a different direction. Maybe, idk. Some1Casual, felt what you said.

You've been under a rock then the last few years. AMD is not behind Intel in de CPU space (and neither the GPU space). For GPu's they are behind Nvidia for sure. But saying they are behind Intel is just laughable and shows you haven't been "in the technology field" for 20 years.

We can download gpu's now💀💀

Wait wait wait... what do you mean by viruses? My task manager is showing 512GB of RAM but my GPU is running 100% all the time to generate it. Is that bad?

@@4Core100 Sounds good to me

Nvidia: you wouldn't download free performance would you ?

i just downloaded more vram 10/10

Same here!

Buying Nvidia RTX 4090 and supporting AMD is the best decision I made. Thanks to AMD we can all benefit from there generosity.

@@dtrjones Hey, if you can afford to fork out that much for a card - go for it, honestly! It's an amazing card. It's just that... yeah. 2000+ dollars is a bit steep (not even gonna count the need for a top-of-the-line CPU, monitor, PSU etc. to run that beast to its full potential). I was interested in the 4070, but goddamn... 600+ is ridiculous.

I bought a 6750xt and they even gave me Starfield with it lol

@@X_irtzwhat 2000 dollars are you talking about? In my country its 1400 dollars

Yep

Except that displays with a G-Sync module are still the superior option for the widest color gamut and framerate target (goes lower and higher). Same thing with DLSS - higher quality, done very fast. Same thing with motion interpolation (frame gen)...

Freesync is trash though. Has way more issues than Gsync. Gsync is basically plug and play while FreeSync is definitely not plug and play.

​@@xuimodDont care, having options is better than not. Still wont be buying an nvidia card. Even if AMD are shit atleast I can afford their stuff. Its better than nothing at all. The only way I will buy Nvidias stuff is if they compete at AMD's level. If they refuse then I guess il just have to buy an AMD card as a last resort.

​@@gavinferguson2938 Except you should care? People like you praise AMD for making an open but subpar offering and then never make any noise about it not improving over the years. FSR 3 is finally them admitting that FSR was crap compared to DLSS, and it still probably hasn't caught up. Freesync is also subpar to G-Sync and AMD has done nothing to push the standard forward.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qa17dtWUs9m6qqM.html - Ray Reconstruction works on all GeForce RTX GPUs

AMD would do the exact same thing if they were in the same position of nvidia. Nvidia doesn't give a fuck about this because they know they're going to sell more cards at a higher price this year.

I mean amd has been secureing exclusive deals with games to cut dlss out for little reason other then to have their program be the defacto software

imagine gloryfing one company while trashing the other while they are the same

@@mateuszkrytyk5711 I hard disagree.... Have used both and currently using NVIDIA, I always felt more cared for while using AMD products, and I find them to be way more compassionate.

Good but people (including me) would still buy Nvidia GPUs to get Nvidia exclusive technology while being able to have AMD technology too I do hope AMD kicks Nvidias ass though

Let's not hope it becomes vader

The K6 microprocessor was launched by AMD in 1997. The main advantage of this particular microprocessor is that it was designed to fit into existing desktop designs for Pentium-branded CPUs. It was marketed as a product that could perform as well as its Intel Pentium II equivalent but at a significantly lower price. The K6 had a considerable impact on the PC market and presented Intel with serious competition.

no company is saint lol

Its the hero like Petyr Baelish where you at the end realize how much you got played and that AMD is actually worse than Nvidia ever could be.

tldr you forgot Intel GPUs existed because fanboy

how come if all they did is to make nvidia a better investment? or am I missing smt?

@@plagx3428 People take sides, and if I'm going to take the side of someone, it will be people that don't stall innovation by stupid limitations

@@ahypernova how does dlss work tho? Is it a driver or it requires a certain chip in gpu to get an actual performance out of it?

@@plagx3428 The whole thing only works on nVidia and they have limited version 3 to only 4000 series. I have a 3080 and I can't use dlss 3.

@@plagx3428 its an ai powered image enhancing technology that's exclusive only to Nvidia's RTX graphics cards (RTX 2000s and up), while AMD is pushing out the same thing but making it available to all GPU brand models and way older GPUs.

Yep, where the fuck is FSR 3 SDK? Still waiting

Why not?

frame Generation sucks on older gpus because they wont Produce enough fps... it feels laggy as hell.. dlss 3.5 will destroy amd anyway again, amd is Anyway irrelevant for the highend Marked

​@@adidkjfis dlss 3.5 even available in 1000 series

​@@Shahzad12357No, DLSS 3.5 is only for RTX cards.

​@@adidkjf How can DLSS 3.5 destroy amd when it will only run on newest generation while FSR runs on nvidia. DLSS does have better quality image but realistically you cant see any of that shit while playing.

​@@adidkjfyou sound like a Nvdia fanboy...

I made that switch 2 gens back. Never looked back and never missed nvidia or intel cpus for that matter

Most people only looking for the fastest card.. That its 9/10 always Nvidia. I buy only a card that suits my needs.. I know the RX7900XT isnt maybe great value. But want to have more progress over an RX 6700XT.. and a RX 7900XT is currently only what i need to run Raytracing with a great 1440P monitor.. And always can switch up a notch to 4K gaming without Raytracing. Its enough for the next 5 a 6 years.

People tend to forget that there are also many creators and developers who absolutely needs CUDA and have no choice...

@@rallyscoot7900XT became great Value when AMD chopped the price down to 699$.. outpreforms the 4070Ti by a 7-12% on average and it has enough Vram to last a long time. 20GB is a gigantic memory pool compared to 12GB on 4070Ti.

​@rallyscoot well it is great value especially considering that it beats the 1200$ 4080

As if AMD would not be a company 😂 They are just want to get a bigger portion of the cake, which nvidia currently holds , these are great ads and PR for AMD

@@bence2345 Right, but it's correct that AMD have always innovated for the benefit of the consumer. Intel had their greedy tick-tock development model that squeezed maximal profit for minimal progress for years until AMD (Having invested heavily in their heterogenous architecture and APU's) forced them to show their hand with Ryzen. And before that they propelled PC gaming forward with the Athlon x64 chips, making multicore processors accessible for the casual markets.

Vulkan did not start by AMD. Vulkan have it's original base from OpenGL Next. they just add AMD mantle stuff to it. but even without mantle OpenGL already allowing architecture specific optimization to be done. "It's about time AMD starts being chaotic good instead of just good." good? in one aspect sometime they actually worse than nvidia. they try to claim competitor try to hurt them but in reality they also did the same thing. just that when they are the one that got hit they complain a lot. what AMD try to do with Mantle before also anti consumer. but AMD have always been seen as the underdog and back then they get a lot of pass. that's why AMD end up cancelling Mantle 2.0 because game developer understand the real AMD intention with Mantle.

I knew mantle but thought it died to vulkan, seems it actually gave birth to it.

@@bence2345 Of course they want money, they are a company. But their strategy is making a better product for everyone, not just selling the bleeding edge for eye watering money to the elite only. Not all companies' ethics are equal, you know.

Can’t even imagine lmao must’ve helped so much

People who play handheld and steamdeck are like vegans looking for a soy burger that tastes like meat

@@milosv123344or maybe we travel a lot and don’t wanna carry two laptops. Or maybe we like Moonlighting from our PC on the couch.

@@slickvibez16 exactly. and tbh, I don't own a steam deck or any handheld pc. but I do already have been through 3 gaming laptops and have been a solid nintendo HANDHELD gamer since 4th grade. I've had a PC (not a gaming one) at home and having the mobility is just pure convenience for my use case. I understand the difference in power between the form factors and I never found myself wanting more. it's just that the mobile nature or my lifestyle is better suited for having devices on the go. Case in point: I've been eyeing the GPD Win Max for quite some time now just to lighten the load on my backpack.

@@Unlucky1776 I mean I'm basically having high expectations here and i'm 100% overhyping . There's probably a catch like reduced battery. it's just that seeing them frames and fidelity on a portable just brings a tear to my eye

le DLSS 3.5 n'est pas la continuité du DLSS 3.0 ils ont fait exprès pour que les gens soient contents, mais la frame generation est uniquement disponible sur les RTX 4000 donc automatiquement le FSR 3.0 de chez AMD sera sans doute bien meilleur que le DLSS 3.0 de chez nvidia@@qui3573

DLSS sucks anyway and i always turn it off

I find it depends on the game. It helps in some games, but in other games it makes it look terrible/doesn't really improve much @@bulbazoth6473

@@bulbazoth6473 It doesn't suck.. It does help but if you have a 40 series card you will rely in DLSS 3 because without DLSS 3 enabled on a 40 series it will be worse than 20 series cards lmao

@@qui3573 ah bah j’espère bien la 3070 que j’ai a jamais vraiment été avantagée par quoi que ce soit depuis que je l’ai (1an et demi)

When i can talk to the ai and its trying to groom my kids to be trans

@@censored4christ162 what

@@censored4christ162 ????

@@censored4christ162 Ok

Same

Let's see, but FSR so far has been decent.

People getting overly hyped didn't see the requirements for using FSR3 without major issues like lag and ghosting.

@@DelgaDude all im hoping for is using it in cyberpunk and hopefully starfield.

Well people hype any shit nvidia put out, why not hype amd tech too?

I am sure it won't. FSR is always much worse than RTX features. Nvidia keeps asking for shitloads of money because their tech is much better. I appreciate the sentiment from AMD but they have been overhyping their products for 15 years at least and Ryzen was the only time they a actually delivered. Also RX480

it actually can run in older gpus, like gtx and rx 500s, but it's not 100% confirmed about performance like rtx 20s and rx 5700+

It CAN run on older GPUs (RX 500 Series, GTX 10xx series...), but AMD strongly recommend RX 5700 & above or RTX 2000 series & above to be able to generate frames effectively.

They said this with original FSR …pro tip guys get a monitor with its own image sharpening tech inside…. You’ll see balanced FSR 40% more frames… no loss of visual quality whatsoever.

So it'll work with a 3070, thanks for the info.

​@@jimcacheroNot the same. It induces a lot of latency with screens techs

Thanks AMD to let us not to spend money on graphic cards

...something crazy? u mean their prices to the roof?

Nvidia, OK lets release RTX 5xxx series sooner, to eliminate competition for good.

@@pekonipilvi116 It means Nvidia will be forced to respond with something crazy lest they want to lose EVERYONE in team green to AMD

@@greenavocado7074 they won't, their best nodes are for AI cards ;)

With fsr 3.1 completely

And supposedly on consoles as well. Sheeeed dude.

Can't wait for testing this on rx 6400!

Do note, this does not mean FSR3 will not work with other and slower GPUs, it is simply not recommended and optimized. Graphics cards such as GTX 10 and lower will also support FSR3 upscaling, but not the frame generation technology. -AMD

@@nicekeyboardalan6972 ohhhh

i own a gtx 1050ti@@nicekeyboardalan6972

My steam deck was my first thought, this sounds huge

100% on this. I think AMD & Steam really are going to be spearheading linux over the next 5-10 years

It's not just PR, it's a good strategy, if they didn't open FSR 3 to all GPU, dev would have the choice bewteen FSR and DLSS, the wouldn't want to implement the two of them and since there is more nvidia gpu than AMD would have gone with DLSS since it cover more user. But with an open FSR it cover all user so it became the defacto choice and allow AMD card to be competitive with Nvidia

Yeah, FSR 3 with frame generation can run on anything as old as 20 series Nvidia cards or 500 series AMD cards, and without 10 series and 5000 series respectively, but the way I read it there is a good chance to go even one or two generations older and still get it to work with a benefit. Though I wouldnt recommend frame generation with anything under 60 native FPS just to avoid input lag issues, and neither does AMD, so maybe dont go too crazy with that old 750Ti. Frame generation is really just there to get some extra smoothness for high refresh rate monitors, not really as a crutch for gaming performance. But this is still miles ahead of giving the best crutch to the most modern GPUs that realistically shouldnt even need it (but actually do because lower end cards are performing on the same level as their respective 30 series cards and their only improvement is better DLSS support)

Oh my god, for Steam Deck I cannot wait!!

your decision means their strat worked. I'm also buying one so they got me too.

ME too

Same

I would have switched to AMD long ago if I didn't have to do things other than gaming with my PC. I hope they step it up in other areas too.

@@Relseg and what are you doing besides gaming that AMD card can't do?

I love competition

Competition is good.

@@potatobang7713 30% higher cost 😂

nice username, are you a founder of winamp?

Competition means win for the customer

they run just as fast, if not faster than nvidia cards anyway. I swapped out a GTX1660S for an RX6600 and saw small bumps in performance, and even some raytracing abilities while staying above 50fps on a card that cost $100 less at the time. I prob wont ever go back to nvidia. Just throwing money away to fanboy...

they also have great support for Linux, while nvidia is nearly unusable on linux

Yeah agree, Nvidia just took a lead with their new DLSS but this isn't an argument anymore :D however, I think they're still ahead in the streaming territory in terms of visual quality.

I'm also going AMD seems they also require less energy to run the same frames as their Nvidia equivalent so in the long term that saves money too. Energy is Hella expensive here.

y and deal with the shitty software they have.... got ride of my 5700xt and i will not return untill they are able to do one decent software.... it was a nightmare.....

facts man, their gpus, cpus, software etc. they are going crazy!

Thats why they always copy what Nvidia is doing in terms of graphic technology lol Don't get me wrong, I hate Nvidia with their greedy little rat fingers, but calling AMD graphics department, innovative? nah lol Their CPU department tho. Thats innovative

how is it innovative?

You are joking right :D

@@briankim6148how are they copying NVIDIA. Give a example or evidence.

this will also make devs more lazy, like the recent fiasco with recommended specs including DLSS performance mode. Trust me you dont want this to happen. The gaming industry is already a disaster as it is, running not really graphically intensive games at ridiculously low framerates because they never bothered to optimise the game to run better. Im just getting this off the top of my head for Baldurs Gate 3 recently. The game with its graphics had no right to require those specs. The game is poorly optimised so they just throw in a faster GPU? That is not how you do it, the game looks far worse than what we got years and years ago and yet they ask for a GPU that wasnt even out yet when we had those graphics.

@@Glade4 I'm pretty sure the BG3 system requirements aren't even that crazy, what are you on about?

​@nicholas_btw Talking about how lazy developers got with Remnant 2. Amazing game, shit optimization and performance. Developer said it was made with "DLSS and upscaling in mind". It looks good but not Cyberpunk good, they cut a few corners in that regard, it barely runs like it's supposed to on high end 4080 and 4090 GPUs.

​@@nicholas_btwyou can run it on a GTX 710 (single fps @ 720p and lower double digits with fsr) but that's actually impressive for a card that barely handles KZfaq, lol.

@@kevinsj99 Well of course it doesn't look as good as Cyberpunk, that game has path tracing. We can't be asking for "next-gen" games and then complain when 5 year old graphics cards can't run them at max settings. Whether we like it or not, AI upscaling and frame gen and all those other things are basically required if we want games to look better and better.

Not to put a shame But the Legends Love was Always on them ))!) What a company!!

AMD was always cool-- I still remember when Bulldozer got shat on by everyone in the industry but AMD just kept on chuggin, and TekSyndicate defended that POS generation and we got one of the funniest YTP videos on the tech industry out of it?

Nvidia does no longer care about gaming. Much more money in AI.

Like they always try to reinvent the wheel that somehow ends up being a rectangle.

​@@truantrayWhich AMD will overtake them in that department in 3 years as well.

It's about undercutting Nvidia's products, not gamers - this being open source make Nvidia's DSLL3 technology much less valuable, and thus their cards less desirable. But still, great news.

Nobody cares about you. They care about your money. And the less superior company has to undercut the price of the market leader as andr said.

@@andrzejsugier Why not both?

It's both. This move helps steer potential customers towards AMD but AMD for a long time has tried to be open with their tech while Nvidia has always been a firm NO and locks it down into their own devices. So much so they do it per generation of their own cards, IE the fact older cards CAN do the same things as the newer cards albeit maybe not as quickly in many instances, they make sure it won't regardless of modified drivers proving it works lol. It's forced obsoletion really and they should be held accountable for it like smart phone manufacturers.

They dont care about you, they care about getting the coin in your pocket before you hand it to someone else. This is true of ALL businesses regardless of industry or business sector.

Nobody has ever intentionally harmed performance of older cards. Not sure what you're getting at? In fact, AMD has historically had horrendous drivers for their newer cards at launch.

​@@dhkatz_I'd advise you do your research properly. Nvidia was caught, and fined, as a result of limiting performance in later drivers during the GTX 700 - GTX 900 series GPUs (2012-2015). This was the same time Apple was subsequently fined for doing the same on iOS updates for older Gen phones to falsify performance differences between newer and older hardware.

poopoo@@dhkatz_

@@dhkatz_nice try shlomo

Gods forbid they improve their products @@dhkatz_ also what @thatzaliasguy said.

DLSS 3 as well as 3.5 works on all Nvidia GPUs. Only Frame Generation part of it works on expensive cards. Get your facts right before slating something.

they did very dirty sh*t with the frame generation only on 4xxx series. and the dlss is trash in most games on 1080p.

AMD latency reduction for FSR3 is locked to 7000 series. You can enable fake frames generation but with horrible latency on all the other cards.

@@korhanaydemir8366 Yeah, but AMD also stated the competitors can use their own built in latency reduction software if they decide to use AMD Frame Gen, so Nvidia can use their Reflex for example, and Reflex seem to be the better deal still vs. Anti Lag+

Rdna3 performance gains are minimal as well. I don't see why the rtx 4000 series gpus are being bashed for this (other than price) and not the rx 7000 gpus too.

since they started spelling rising wrong

AMD always pushes the open standards. This isn't really anything new. But because AMD pushes open standards, their implementations can be a bit behind Nvidia in terms of quality. Then people compare them and declare Nvidia to be better. Then the Nvidia good, AMD bad circle jerking starts again and we are back at square one with a self imposed Nvidia vendor lock and people being angry about that. Its a constant self defeating process. AMD really just needs to win for once and actually match Nvidia in quality, but have their stuff work on everything. Lets hope FSR3 actually does that. 🙂

@@DanielWW2 They're not behind due to the open standards, on the contrary. A lot of their software only is usable because it's open and they get contributions for free. AMD is behind in software because they're a much smaller company and they invest much less into software development.

AMD always had chadium balls but they became larger and larger lately lol

You'll regret it.. my flatmate is regretting it. He can't play 2 popular games because randomly it crashes, always has driver problems. But don't take my word for it, go get one.. enjoy.

@@TheAngryIntellect- 6700xt runs everything flawlessly

@@TheAngryIntellect-6600xt red devil, also running everything flawlessly

@@TheAngryIntellect- case per case , the only issue with Amd is the pilote that is kinda weird to use and i got One game that lock himself at 90fps that i Can unlock if i do windows key

@@TheAngryIntellect- skill issue

thats what they do, AMD literally saved us from an Intel monopoly of CPUs, they have a lot of work to do to match the benefits of nvidia gpu's(cause performance its mostly the same), because nvidia has been dominating the market for so long that even the games themselves are better optimized for these cards, apart from all the facilities with Geforce Experience, dlss and so on, the FS3 is a very good step, my processor is Ryzen, however my graphics card is still Nvidia, but they won't be able to inflate prices for much longer if AMD continues to offer such good product improvements

They just opened up the market for any card that supports DX11. I've got a decade-old 8gb R390 in the e-waste pile that just became a viable card again, think I'll build a little boneyard PC for my nephew :)

You need to support those that do right by you. And stop supporting those that don't. That's what gamers need to do. And we all know what the right thing to do is here.

@@donmauricio2845 Pshh... Nvidia still held back on VRAM on the RTX 3000 series. Imagine knowing my "used to be" 3060Ti competitor card, the 6700XT 12GB, now beating the 3070 and in some case the 3070 Tii in practically any new AAA game released in 2023 and some from 2022 because why? Because they only stuck 8GB VRAM in that. My dang RX480 8GB from 2016 had 8GB VRAM. Do you know how much more the plain 3070 8GB cost over the 6700XT back then? It was like $200+ more. And the only thing it really beat it in was "RTX" DX Ray Tracing. Rasterization? The 6000 series is the top dog. Games without "RTX" or any ray tracing? The 6000 series blew away the dollar for dollar Nvidia equivalent. Stop buying Nvidia. Stop buying from a company that gives you something special that only your generation of card can run... until 8 months later when they release the next gen and you can't use it. Imagine being an RTX 2000 series owner. DLSS frame generation? What's that? Oh, only for 4000 series guys. AMD has ALWAYS made EVERYTHING Open Source. And honestly, they shouldn't. They should give Nvidia a taste of their own medicine. Imagine if anything from the 1660Ti and back couldn't use FSR 1 or 2.x. Only every single AMD card. But AMD actually cares about gamers. They get NOTHING out of someone on a 1060 6GB being able to use FSR because that 1060 guy is gonna buy Nvidia on his next go around. Nvidia? They throw PhysX and Hairworks and not just DXR (DirectX Ray Tracing) but "RTX" DXR into everything they can so that it will perform terribly on AMD cards. They've been doing this since 2005 or so with PhysX. Then Hairworks. And there's always some proprietary "Nvidia paywall" bull crap that Nvidia throws out there to hurt AMD users. And AMD STILL says "We don't care, we're gamers. You got a 1080 Ti? You got a 980 Ti? You have a 1050Ti? A 1060 3GB? Here... use our FSR 2.1. Play that game you couldn't play before." Why would you NOT support that company? What do you think happens when more and more people support a company like that? Their R&D gets more money put into it, they expand, they grow and they make killer cards that outperform Nvidia. Not that they don't do that anyways dollar for dollar. Plus, AMD is always faster 6 months down the road. Fine wine technology. Like I said, I used to battle with the 3060 Ti. Now? That's a 6600XT competitor and I trade blows with the 3070. And in the newest games (games that use more than 8GB VRAM), I smoke the 3070Ti because they crash or don't load textures lol. Or they drop 30% performance as soon as they use up their VRAM. Stop supporting an anti-consumer company. Stop it.

Oh, and look at games that don't use "RTX" DXR... like UE5 games. The 6900/6950XT blows away the 3080Ti with Lumen and Nanite enabled. Or is it the 3090 that it blows away? AMD has ALWAYS been the better bang for the buck at launch, then they improve over time with driver updates... and now UE5 is becoming a thing and Nvidia can't bribe them to use RTX DXR. They already have Lumen. And AMD does better with Lumen ray tracing than Nvidia.

that's hecking awesome!!

​@@striker7729why is it so?

@@niokla3867wat

​@@niokla3867you'll literally run FSR3 on a *mobile device*

because it's gonna work on steam deck idk@@niokla3867

How? I can use both features with a modern Nvidia GPU, while AMD can only do AMD. I feel like AMD played themselves, but increasing the already big feature spectrum on Nvidia GPU's.

​@@Peh84wat?

@@slavcow what wat? You got AMD, you only get FSR. You got Nvidia you get DLSS and FSR. Let's just ignore that garbage that is frame generation. But DLSS 2 is still superior to FSR 2 and with DLSS 3.5 you also get Ray Reconstruction for stable RT effects. The usuable feature list increases for Nvidia GPU's, too.

@@Peh84Because ray tracing totally doesn’t nuke performance. No-one cares about ray tracing until we can get a decent fking frame-rate. Comp players play with low settings and 1080p for a reason. They like the responsiveness and high frames.

@@X39-hg9lz Got a 4090. Playing on 4k with RT on. Cyberpunk 2077 with Path Tracing looks awesome and it will get better from here with DLSS 3.5. People who got the money to spend on top tier GPU's do care. All the enthusiasts do care. Personally, don't care about comp gamers. But that's all besides my main point, which you didn't address. Why should I care for AMD GPU's if AMD provides the features also for my Nvidia GPU?

I own asus 3080 and i love it. But does anyone know about fsr3 working with 30 series or is it just fsr2?

Bought a XFX 6950XT earlier this year. Best purchase I ever did (coming from a 1050Ti 💀)

fsr3 works with it. yes@@0Blueaura

​@@rocket2739BRO SAMEEE I WENT FROM 1050 TO 6950XT HAHAHHAH, WHAT IS UR INSTA PAL?

@@0Blueaura fsr 3 should work with any graphics card like 2011+ so yeah according to what they presented yes