😂👌🏻

Krenko let's gooo

Ngl I'll have to try this to believe it. Thanks!

My playgroup has tried a 10 card mull. You draw 10, then shuffle 3 back. You can mulligan only once, but it is free. It has also worked pretty well and is fast.

I tried that with my group and it mostly worked well but the insane hands that we would get from that amount of selection lead to some serious blowout games. Still tho I would recommend especially for playgroups that have lower power games.

Interesting. I think I might borrow this. I've tried a few versions of mulligans and they all still feel too long and chaotic. Draw 10 put back 3 works ok. If also tried starting with a blood, a clue, a food and a treasure in the center and can be bought for 1 mana.

I tried to ten put three back Its awesome but watch out its was easier to get combo pieces

Nawh, commander is the least toxic format 😅

Yes! Lol. The last commander game I played, I tried to be fair too far and then we got infinite turned. I could have stopped that!! 😅

You say that but then you die to ad naus a lot more. I think killing the black player first is a better move all in all

​@@magicalgirlanimewas gonna say the same thing, getting dunked on by ad nauseam is the wages of aggro decks that leave black alone

I don't see ad naus in my casual pods

@@alanpigate8776 I mean that'd just mean that killing the blue player at your table is a good idea, it's not generic advice though. Ad Nauseam is one of the most widely played cards in black, you have to assume a stranger running black has it in there somewhere.

LOL you steal my stuff every time 😂

I used to be the sketchy hand keeping friend and I just had to keep getting beat and stuck on lands until I finally stopped keeping bad hands 😅 -Mia

Unlesss that thing is an eldrazi 😅

@@_Asleep_ yeah, if the creature has a powerful attack trigger, this goes out the window.

she has a lot more chemistry with beezy than joe in my opinion. they really have good conversations/play off each other really smoothly.

Absolutely! 💖

@@NitpickingNerdswhat about subscribing to Amber

You know what? You are right. Subscribed

Fr 😂

Agreed 👍

LOL Beezy and I had a ton of fun that game, so it was a win overall 😂💖 -Mia

@@NitpickingNerdsOh great to hear it. Thanks for all the work you do. ✌️

I try to plan out my first 3 turns with my opening hand

"If damage from a source with infect that would be dealt to a player is prevented, that player doesn't get poison counters. If damage from a source with infect that would be dealt to a creature is prevented, that creature doesn't get -1/-1 counters." ^From Gatherer. Also commander damage that is prevented...is prevented. You can eliminate a Protected player if you eliminate damage prevention..."damage can't be prevented".

@@Ghostlin1125 yup thats why i said if you can cast a spell that stops damage from being prevented you can kill with infect and commander damage... even though their life total doesnt change due to tefferi's as long as you get the "damage can't be prevented" spell off, your commander damage is counted, and replacement effects that don't change the life total (such as infect) can happen.

This only works if they respond with Teferi's protection while you're already attacking. If the player already had cast Teferi's response, they don't exist and cannot be attacked.

@@kennellfrederick4367 yeah no... this is a missconception of teferi's, you still exist, your library still exists... you gain "protection" from everything, protection does not stop attacks... anything that mills or manipulates all opponents libraries still work. If you cast a spell that says "damage cannot be prevented this turn" it still applies to the player whos in teferi's.... Alot of players get confused and think just because their permanents are phased out that they as a player are phased out too, but it doesnt work that way... Protection from everything prevents damage and the user from being targeted, but anything that does not target still affects them. The thing that makes it pointless to attack the player is that their life total cannot change and protection would prevent all damage. If another player is goaded, they can still attack the person who has used tefferi's they jsut wont do any damage.

@@kennellfrederick4367 also the players hand still exists so wheel effects and non-targeted discard effects can cause the player to draw/discard cards.... finally the person in tefferi's can still cast spells that have zero cost (though they cannot use life to pay for spells as their life total cannot change).... one cool interaction you can do is cast command the dreadhorde, hold priority and cast tefferi's protection... Teferi's will give you both protection from the black spell and your life total unable to change so command the dreadhord will not deal any damage but will still reanimate all the creatures you selected.... those creatures will enter the battle field after TP has gone off so will not phase out.

Say you have protection from green and a planeswalker at 4 counters. Someone swings at you with questing beast and you dont/can’t block. QB specifically states that damage cannot be prevented, so you’re taking at least 4 damage from it. “Can’t” will always overrule anything else, generally speaking. Since you take that 4 damage since it can’t be prevented, they can also deal 4 damage to your planeswalker and it will die. Definitely a specific example above, but anything like a QB or a different spell that states “damage can’t be prevented this turn” will bypass your protection

I believe it is a single commander must deal enough damage, and they don't stack.

FEELINGS

I swear we will do a deck tech soon

Of course you are!

If you are playing a card that is often more powerful than the moxen, I don't think you can complain when it gets blown up.

Sounds like all it did was turn you off. Get out of here then

@@TonyScimeca why im on the subject of fascist PC culture in MTG, why df is it ok to race swap characters in lue of lore accuracy??? People wanted characters accurate to the lore in the books and movies, not racial equity (aka white man bad, sound familiar orange man bad). No we're not racist for wanting accuracy in our beloved IP's, we're just loyal fans who want to see justice for our Fandom. We have plenty of black representation in MTG, a ton of it actually and that's awesome. But it shouldn't come at the expense of QUALITY of representation. By doing all this woke bs WoTC is loosing fans/players in large droves. Loyal players of 20-30 years are selling everything and walking away, that's not how you keep your global phenom of a game going. As budweiser, target, and Disney have proven beyond any doubt... go woke go broke. Life your life how you want, be gay, be happy, but don't force it upon me or anyone else. Cherries, if you ever actually read any of this I hope your not too offended. I have been a fan of yours n have enjoyed your hot takes and decks. I just don't agree with the political bs in a card game. Beezy... lol I hope I'm right in assuming Mia is your GF lol. 🤣😎

I hate how everything needs to be a political statement these days. I don't care what someone's affiliation or orientation is. It doesn't affect my life in the slightest. Shoehorning it in is just lame. Makes me wonder if Joe left because there was a disagreement with Beezy over some minor political thing.

Should Beezy never mention his girlfriend because that's injecting sexuality into a casual card game? Should Mia and Beezy never refer to each other in the third person to avoid ever using pronouns? Why is it only 'political' when it's a sexuality or identity you don't like?

Announcing your pronouns takes away any confusion. It's what we should be doing. I understand if you think it's "a lot", but not trying to interpret how someone's presenting is way easier than trying to figure out what someone is. Especially if those pronouns are easy and mainstream.