Thank you listening and commenting. I am very glad it was helpful!

That is correct. Thank you for your comment and for listening. God bless you

@@leonardsmalls2758 thanks for your comment! And for listening. I will take your idea under consideration.

Thank you for your kind comments. I will consider the CSB. God bless

@@g0thamite Yes, please consider reviewing the CSB as well as the NKJV. Thank you.

A lot of people care, sadly. Some people reject any bible translation where _any_ woman was involved, _because_ a woman was involved. They believe either that a woman should not be "teaching" or even that a woman should not be working at all EVER outside the home. Because of such beliefs, we have recent translations like the ESV 2001 where the over 90 people who worked on it were all men. It was led by Wayne Grudem, who had co-authored a book that says women should not work outside the home, should not drive buses, and should not give directions to a man who is lost because this equals women teaching and leading. The ESV is a generally reliable translation, except in the area of gender, where they deliberately translate through the lense of "women exist primarily as helpers to men" . On the other side are scholars like Katharine Bushnell (1855-1946), a translator who argued that the sexual predation she found among "Christian" British men in the Colonies in Asia were a _result_ of a Bible translation committees that excluded women. She did a lot of influential scholarship and translation work. Historian Kristen Kobes DuMez wrote a fantastic book on her. Worth checking out. Naturally, I side with Bushnell's arguments. It's silly to think that only men should do translation work. It's crazy to think that you won't distort some meaning for half the population of there is no one in the room to give that perspective. A lot of writing has been done on the subject, and people have a lot of strong feelings on both sides of the debate. So, I feel happy when I see females included in translation committees, because they are _deliberately_ excluded from some very well marketed versions.

Thanks for listening and your suggestion. I will consider it. God bless

@@g0thamite Thanks! That's Great! Though it's obscure and, I believe, not even being Printed nowadays; it's an interesting Holy Bible - very readable and it foreruns many of today's Text Block standards and options.

Why is this a problem? Does the scripture not apply equally to women?🤔🤔🤔

@@politereminder6284 In some cases, NO. There are many places where messages are directed ONLY to men or ONLY to women. For example, Paul often directed his message specifically to the men in his audience to the exclusion of women, and then separately either addresses women or tells the men to do so. In this case using the gender neutral language is wrong. Also Psalm 1, as I mentioned, is explicitly worded in a way that _cannot_ refer to women.

​@@fnjesusfreakSo, Psalm 1 cannot apply to women? 🤔

@@politereminder6284 It doesn't say "the person", it says "the man". Many early Christians understood it to refer to one specific Man.

@@fnjesusfreak So, it's about ONE man? Not for the benefit of men throughout ages? 🤔 Or for the benefit of all human people throughout the ages?🤔🤔🤔 We know what it says, but what does it actually mean?

Ha!

@@g0thamite You continue to do a great job with all of your content. Thanks!

Can't Make This Stuff Up Dept.: The computer gods don't recognizer/understand your 'Ha!' above. (Too formal and not functional enough?!) There is an auto-generated 'Translate to English' below the 'Ha!'. And this in a video and channel all about translation! (In case you're a curious cat like me, when you click on the translate button, it says 'See original (Translated by Google). God should use that one!)

@@kultus Thank you for listening and commenting. I appreciate it.

@@g0thamite I come from a long line of teachers as well as musicians and you are both. The Maestro of Manuscripts!

@deeman, you're absolutely right. I don't know where people get that from. Toni's hubby

Much more than just an update

You are incorrect. This is a common assumption by folks who have spent little to no time in the NLT.

@cpcourtney6570 At this time, I will take a time out. My wife went home to be with our Lord yesterday morning at 5 am. I have her memory to think of now. God's best to you, in Jesus name.

@@Pastor-Brettbyfaith … I will certainly keep you in prayer brother. God‘s best to you as well.