I heard about the Dark Star back in 2014. The speed is much greater than Mach 6. It can fly from LA to NYC in 20 minutes at top speed. Yes thats Mach 12. It can hit and be gone. It travels so fast it can evade all missles.. Russia is making an attempt to counter with their S-550, but the Dark star is probably 8 to years ahead in technology. Go USA.. :)
@MikeNelson-pj7lw4 ай бұрын
Did you know that the nellis range had been extended through into Canada during testing
@Sam-hr9nd2 ай бұрын
Consider it a nuclear deterant
@johnbyrne4438 Жыл бұрын
Sorry, the SR-71 never was a 'fighter' aircraft, reconnaissance only. Maybe you misspoke.
@Barefoot433 Жыл бұрын
OMG, the SR-71 was never a fighter craft, it was surveillance. And a variable jet motor is not going to go from jet-turbine to rocket, it would go to RAMjet or SCRAMjet. You lose all credibility on what is really truth, when you don't even know how to describe a bullet cartridge- for example. Sounds like a California lawmaker trying to describe a rifle by how many clips it can fire per second, via upgraded caliber.
@vc7393 Жыл бұрын
How Fucking True. I told this guy before this not the only duel engine (Sabre)
@corporalpunish6089 Жыл бұрын
YF12A was the interceptor version that was scrapped by McNamara
@iphoneman1231 Жыл бұрын
This is facts
@johndemore6402 Жыл бұрын
Or they've solved that problem and can do what they claim and our enemies should be really really scared
@congerthomas1812 Жыл бұрын
The "Brace" does it!
@donpierce4829 Жыл бұрын
I think there is a little BS in this Podcast!! Damn this guy is smoking some pretty heavy duty hay!!!
@Provocateur3 Жыл бұрын
Agreed. WTF does 2 mps mean? According to my calculator, that's 7200 mph, or about Mach 9.39. I'd like to see some support for this number.
@jaysartori9032 Жыл бұрын
Thank GOD she is on our side!! Also, GOD bless the scientists and the energizer that helped to build it.
@alanmccauley1868 Жыл бұрын
Do not let our enemies get this technology.
@carltheriot8107 Жыл бұрын
With our lax-a-dazickle Idiots in Congress, I’m sure the Chinese have all the data & plans already!
@Elvis_Pond5 Жыл бұрын
This is a joke... the US is far beyond this
@mastermariner490 Жыл бұрын
@@OKNOOOOOOOStrange that since we havent seen any other countries making any prototypes Usually China would steal the blueprints first
@JWRay-xh9wl Жыл бұрын
Are you sure we should have it.
@afreightdogslife Жыл бұрын
Hunter probably already has made an appointment with Xi to personally deliver the info to them, and the Big Guy, of course, doesn't know what's going on 🤣🤣👌🏻👌🏻
@jsmariani4180 Жыл бұрын
The beauty of KZfaq is that you can upload literally anything and some people will believe it.
@charlesangell_bulmtl Жыл бұрын
thus YT's full of it ..
@ricorackeroni6563 Жыл бұрын
I’d just like to know where are you getting all this data from??
@bf-696 Жыл бұрын
He is making a lot of it up.
@James-Johnson313 Жыл бұрын
He watched Top Gun #2, a documentary.
@ricorackeroni6563 Жыл бұрын
@@James-Johnson313 😂 extended cut
@johngallati8164 Жыл бұрын
IF THEY REVEAL THIS.. THEY HAVE EVEN BETTER.
@zora_noamflannery2548 Жыл бұрын
- probly had it 30 years ago.
@Mapea_Hijrah Жыл бұрын
The Lockheed Martin SR-72, colloquially referred to as "Son of Blackbird", is an American hypersonic UAV concept intended for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) proposed privately in 2013 by Lockheed Martin as a successor to the retired Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird. The company expected an SR-72 test vehicle could fly by 2025...
@michaelbrininstool4515 Жыл бұрын
There is no way a plane can fly at 2 miles per second close enough to the ground to take roofs off houses. Maybe one can go that fast at 80k feet or more, but not on the deck.
@trcass1 Жыл бұрын
The SR-71 was an incredible reconnaissance aircraft. As a retired imagery analyst for the U.S. government, I'm quite familiar with its collection. Waiting to see the SR-72.
@technews_official Жыл бұрын
The whole world is waiting for it
@theblower069 Жыл бұрын
The SR71 wasn`t only a reconnaissance aircraft It was further developed into the F-12 Avenger. Take a look at that.
@bionicbob1285 Жыл бұрын
it was flying 20 years ago
@jorexthox4330 Жыл бұрын
2 miles per second 😮🎉
@frankd8957 Жыл бұрын
The SR-71 was first flown around 1964 and it was a product of the late 1950's and early 1960's. 1964 was 59 years ago so you don't think the USA has made tremendous technological advances in 60 years?
@Searching4Reason Жыл бұрын
Wait...the SR-71 was maneuverable? You're kidding, right? It's widely known that to turn around at speed, it would cross a couple states. Also, pilots didn't use standard flight masks. They had to use essentially space suits.
@charlesangell_bulmtl Жыл бұрын
Did it matter? Was superb in it's day & duty...These new ones? Time will tell.
@aymonfoxc1442 Жыл бұрын
That's a lot better than flying in a straight line or boasting a turn radius that encompases continents! Maneuvrability is contextual.
@rb032682 Жыл бұрын
"ease the conflict", ?!?!?!? yeah, right!
@redpillpirate111 Жыл бұрын
Rules for advanced aircraft. If you know about it, it's already obsolete.
@robertlewis2542 Жыл бұрын
A bit hard to put much faith in what this vid has to say when they don't seem to realize the SR 71 was never a fighter... literally it's in the name SR Perhaps it's time to rebrand from Tech News to Tech Fiction?
@ronl8495 Жыл бұрын
The Aurora Project has been going on for years, wake-up people!
@kennethhopson5013 Жыл бұрын
I know that the United States has the very best fighting planes in the world, but I believe they show too much of what we have available.
@spacecadet12496 ай бұрын
The government always says "still under development" LONG after it's been put in service. Are they lying? Not really. How many years were they working out the bugs on the F-35? How many years have they been updating security patches in Microsoft Windows?
@MrChosenOne7575 ай бұрын
I can assure you most unidentified aircraft have been flying around without public notice
@MrWilderNapalm Жыл бұрын
F-117 flew combat sorties a decade before we knew it existed. I'd say Dark Star has the same track record. She has been flying for awhile now I'd be willing to bet.
@jayhope615 Жыл бұрын
no somebody would have seen it by now..cellphones didnt exist like they do know..everybody has a camera,besides that as soon as they open the hangar doors to roll it out somebody is sitting there ready to take pictures 24/7.
@MrWilderNapalm Жыл бұрын
@@jayhope615 You are assuming she is flying out of America.
@marmite10769 ай бұрын
The sole Darkstar prototype was destroyed whilst testing at Mach 10 during 2019. It was piloted by Captain Pete "Maverick" Mitchell at the control but the Air Force has recently released film of testing in cinemas.
@GhostStag19 Жыл бұрын
The Darkstar is an aircraft that does not exist, it was made up for Top Gun Maverick. But Google does exist, try using it.
@sidneycook3196 Жыл бұрын
it is real.
@jayrizzinthebuff Жыл бұрын
Imagine being a fly on the wall of a Skunk works meeting room!?
@amzarnacht6710 Жыл бұрын
SR-71 was never a combat platform.
@watchit62989 ай бұрын
Thank you to our USA 🇺🇸 MILITARY 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@alanluscombe8a5539 ай бұрын
You have some stuff wrong but either way it is insane how fast flight has developed since the wright brothers. Once we figured out how airfoil worked it was quick
@molemarden518810 ай бұрын
They said that about the U2 .it fly’s to high to be hit .how did that work out
@desinotr0150 Жыл бұрын
All the Chinese need apparently is the unstoppable weather balloon, bane to the U.S. Military.
@bro_dBow Жыл бұрын
It has been known that since “Star Wars” tech came out that laser beams can be defeated by reflective coatings. How does this laser work against coatings that reflect the infrared frequency of this laser?
@proteusnz99 Жыл бұрын
Another question is how is the laser powered? The most powerful disclosed airborne laser was chemically based and needed the volume of a 747 to lift the equipment. As a weapon in a fighter? Leave that to the X-wings in Star Wars. You could in theory use an extremely compressed pulse to deliver all the energy in an extremely short time period (microsecond or less) but that will scorch the paint in a small area, perhaps make a small hole, but unlikely to knock out a modern jet, short of a golden bb hit. There is also the issue of thermal bloom, in atmosphere a lot of the energy from a high power laser will convert intervening gas to plasma, attenuating the beam.
@rabbitankle10 ай бұрын
did you notice they said unmanned? AI will be our curse.
@johnlord8337 Жыл бұрын
You need LORD Consulting to put a neutronium Meissner force field fabric on that vessel - and there will be no G forces, no shear forces, no heat differentials from nose to tail, no speed limit, ... as you have a literal air slipstream (no air friction sound barrier). LORD Consulting is the leading researcher for superconductors, superconductivity, superconductive fabrics, ... and supra-sessional flying abilities.
@jim7060 Жыл бұрын
You've already shared the capabilities of the seventh generation fighter so you must be working on the 10th by now. 🇺🇸✝️☝️🙏☝️✝️🇺🇸
@zoop2132 Жыл бұрын
Does it have USB ports?
@enriquedelapena7159 Жыл бұрын
The sr71 is not a fighter jet, it's role was that of spy, reconnaissance
@tv10morehead Жыл бұрын
I caught that too, YF12 OF CIA had a missile experiment ...
@petegarnett7731 Жыл бұрын
I think that's about 3000 totally unbelievably unbeatable warplanes that have appeared online in recent years. Strangely, they are all still secret and do not even appear at airshows. Perhaps they are so fast and stealthy that they disappear up their own tailpipes. They are also insulting those who built planes like the SR71 by suggesting they only discovered how much they heated up or the difficulties of balancing partial pressures for oxygen delivery at altitude AFTER they were flying.
@jocoloco132010 ай бұрын
Let’s see what the Tic-Tac can do! Lol
@MichaelSWLI Жыл бұрын
Are you serious? If that’s true, why were you using top gun scene to describe the new fighter jet?
@sweetdreams8215 Жыл бұрын
i have a question for you , why have you put into your video commentary commentary from the British Tempest Program ?
@BucketWheat Жыл бұрын
Aren't there already Hyper-sonic Missiles..? as well as Lasers that could be mounted to a 'Drone' type missile..? How far does a Laser beam remain DANGEROUS or even DEADLY?? Particularly if it misses the target, or after it has cut thru the target....
@MatthewBaileyBeAfraid Жыл бұрын
A Laser Beam today remains “deadly” to an Unarmored/unprotected Target for quite a ways. Especially if it is Pulsed. BUT… They are useless now as such weapons thanks to the discovery of a Scaleable Manufacturing process for Hardened Aerogels in 2018. A fraction of a mm of Hardened Aerogel is enough to protect something from any conceivable Laser Weapon we could build for decades to Centuries. It wasn’t expected that Hardened Aerogels would ever be manufacturable… Until some kid in a University Lab discovered a process around 2016, and showed that it worked in 2018. The USA, China, Russia, France, Germany (Everyone with a High-Energy Laser Weapons Program) just kind of quietly wrapped them up, knowing that what they had was basically the equivalent of the IJN’s Yamato Battleships in 1940: Something enormously powerful that was a Waste of Money due to it being so vulnerable to the Aircraft Carrier. And to make matters even worse for the HEL Weapons… The Hardened Aerogel is just the most recent thing to make them useless as weapons. Another Technology is being developed that will make any POSSIBLE Laser useless as a weapon, no matter how much “power” it has (typically measured in Megajoules, Gigajoules, Terajoules, etc.)… And there are all manner of Hypersonic Missiles. One that I am pretty sure we have is called “Rods-from-God.” Look into it… Pretty simple stuff for being the equivalent of a Nuclear Weapon that has no explosives of any kind.
@soongwriter Жыл бұрын
5 video screens housed deep inside the airframe in a pilot pod would allow frontal aerodynamics to be ahead of any other aircraft
@jorexthox4330 Жыл бұрын
Missiles cannot catch it??? How about a laser beam or emp weapon
@physbang Жыл бұрын
SR-71 was not the worlds fighter jet because it was not a fighter, it was a recon jet. And the jets colliding with their own missles is BS. Take a physics class. The rocket will always fly faster thant the fighter because rocet speed is already moving at tha fighters speed even before the rocket fires. The two speeds add together to get the rocket speed.
@christopherenno6437 Жыл бұрын
So you're saying a rocket designed with a fictional maximum speed of let's say...mach 12. Will go mach 20 if fired at mach 8? 😂
@caouette81 Жыл бұрын
you're also forgetting that the missile has to drop down BEFORE igniting its engine (at least on the newer jets that hold the missiles inside)...so yes the plane could get hit
@Barefoot433 Жыл бұрын
@@christopherenno6437 Yep, pretty much.
@charlesangell_bulmtl Жыл бұрын
@@christopherenno6437 Initially, drag would bring it down to normal past the plane I presume.
@charlesangell_bulmtl Жыл бұрын
@@caouette81 I don't believe that shit for a minute...If I'm to believe the level of 'smart' achieved today, WHY? Sounds like fictional teething pains This ain't the 50s dude...
@3ppcli Жыл бұрын
Question: how did this aircraft emerge from that hanger without ripping the wings off.
@Timonator3 Жыл бұрын
Whatever happened to the Aurora? Thought that it was Thee Kool Plane?
@jeepers45roll59 ай бұрын
They will never tell you where they are at. We have advanced techno!ogies.
@rogerkant3696 Жыл бұрын
A popular idea but not strong reality support, SR71 and any SR72 are reconnaissance aircraft although some thought was given to an armed version of the SR71. If the aircraft exists and if it is for actual engagement with the enemy it is far more likely to be a strike aircraft not an air superiority fighter. It’s actually too fast for that, you mentioned this yourself, that lasers were chosen not missiles as it could run into its own missiles.
@efrainrodriguez9550 Жыл бұрын
Wow 2 miles per second is never heard of today so far. Dark Star 72 is still Under develpment wow wow😊.
@maxt3902 Жыл бұрын
With the US national debt of 32.7 trillion .
@neilt1889 Жыл бұрын
Are you talking about the Sarkstar or the UKs Tempest as you use both
@californiakid7010 Жыл бұрын
Definitely makes me proud to be AMERICAN !
@jorexthox4330 Жыл бұрын
Now they can nuke the world with it just drop it on them and run 😂🎉💣💣💣
@Thefab5150 Жыл бұрын
So paramount pictures approach Lockheed Martin and say, can you design us a plane that will be the fastest ever? Sure says lockheed martin, that'll be 800 million dollars... please😂😂 hilarious
@Thefab5150 Жыл бұрын
@@name-ym1ymYes, I agree my figures $$ were way off
@MichaelMartinez-hd5lu Жыл бұрын
That is sick
@hbh32210 Жыл бұрын
a 350 KW laser? I dont think so.
@eugeneminton261310 ай бұрын
earlier today i had an idea but since i am not an engineer or anything like that... i'm a sci fi geek and a dreamer mostly. but anyhow ... i was thinking about the issues of having stealth aircraft with missile bays and how when they are opened that it compromises their stealth. how about a rear facing torpedo tube sort of system? i mean you put the weapon into the tube and back it up ... when you wish to launch it, you basically open up flaps on the weapons tail that drag it out of the tube... or you could use venting or pressure systems to push it out... thou i do like the flap idea most... probably used in conjunction with one of the others... anyhow the weapon would need a means of ignoring the launching craft after being released as to not target it when its propulsion engages... would that be a good means of launching a weapon instead of just opening a bay to release them? you'll still need bay doors for loading, but i can imagine them being in a rotary magazine, similar to one that can be carried with b-52's or "other" bombers... which could be pre loaded and waiting for exchange with an aircraft that needs re-arming far faster than loading them each manually within a bay. course this would mean to have either an adjustable launch "torpedo" bay diameter... to accomodate weapons of different sizes... or mean a standardization or add ons to use smaller ones in a larger launch tube... in my head i think "similar to sabot"??... idk if the bay itself could just adjust.. more complicated but in the end it would allow more to be carried right? eh... anyhow that is the idea that popped into my head earlier so felt i shoudl share.. peace.
@nathanokun8801 Жыл бұрын
"SR" means Strategic Reconnaissance, not a fighter/bomber type plane. The "A-12" variant was supposed to be the attack plane, but never put into service. 7200 miles per hour is much faster than I previously heard of. The X-15 was a rocket plane for testing, not any kind of military or commercial aircraft.
@proteusnz99 Жыл бұрын
A-12 was the single seat variant, precursor of SR-71, operated by CIA rather than USAF, believe about 8-10 built, carried out missions over North VietNam in late 1960s. There was an interceptor variant, YF-12A 2 seater using weapons system from XF-108 (radar / missiles) that eventually wound up in the F-14. There was a paper project for a strike SR-71B with weapon bays from SRAMs replacing the reconnaissance gear, but that never got beyond design studies.
@jeremybutler2578 Жыл бұрын
It should be able to lock a target and fly by and drop laser guided missiles while they use their speed to take off....if someone sent drones to identify targets prior to the darkstars arrival it would make target identification instant. You could do all of it remotely to be honest....superfast lightweight drones for recon and then a mach 8 missile dropper with wings that is way higher than the enemy can fly....we need this stuff
@rgloria40 Жыл бұрын
They been developing this since Reagan time... It was probably perfected... The status quo figure out they could make more money by being traitors... For example, the two accused Chinese Spy got through military clearance system somehow... A lot of the old fart military policies allowed/waivers...
@MatthewBaileyBeAfraid Жыл бұрын
That “most powerful Laser in Existence” is totally dead weight, making the aircraft “unarmed” if so. Unless it is fighting non-military targets. But in 2018, the utility of “Laser Weapons” came to a crashing end faster than did the end of the Battleship with the arrival of the carrier. A technological development that had not been expected for a LONG WHILE was made, creating something that is now accelerating not just re-usable heat-shield development for Spacecraft, but is also a nigh impenetrable armor against lasers for a mere fraction of a mm of material: Hardened Aerogels. The “Hardened” simply means that it doesn’t crumble to dust so easily like normal aerogels. But like regular aerogels, it is capable of withstanding enormous temperatures. And it became a “Thing” in 2018, and not just a “thing,” but the creator had a scalable manufacturing process. It was this development that is why the US Military (and Russian, Chinese, Japanese, French, Germans, English, etc… Everyone working on High-Powered Laser Weapons) suddenly became very disinterested in those weapons, and the existing programs were effectively wrapped-up, since, just like all of the Battleships built just prior to WWII, they were essentially a legacy weapon that had no real use in War, and were too expensive to use for things like Piracy Interdiction. So… Your “Sooper-Seekret-airplane” here with a “Lazer-beemz” (spellings intentional) is unarmed, and carrying dead weight it would be better-off without. Because pretty much everything is now made with critical component that have a small layer of hardened aerogel on them (something you could not even tell was a hardened Aerogel unless you knew it before hand). And in the next few years the entire military will be retrofitting the hardened aerogels into the normal armor and weapon construction process since it is negligible in weight and volume (as I mentioned, something like 0.1mm to 0.25mm is sufficient to protect pretty much anything from any laser anyone could build for the next several decades - and by then the next technology that will do vastly more than rendering any POSSIBLE Laser, be it an X-Ray or Gamma-Ray Laser of Trillions of Joules energy or any other Laser that could conceivably be built, entirely useless. That technology is Hyper-Reflecting/Refracting Metamaterials). And the Hyper-Reflective/Refractive Metamaterials are things that do not depend upon traditional optics to work. The types and arrangement of atoms in their substrate causes interference with any photons, or any energy (i.e. Electromagnetic Energy of ANY kind), to be unable to “touch” or be absorbed by the Atoms/Molecules of the Metamaterial. That then causes the photons bounce off the atoms until they are passed through the material and out in another direction (programmed via the construction or manipulation of the Metamaterial), or simply “bounce off” the Metamaterial entirely (Refracting or Reflecting with an Indices of Refraction asymptotic to a Limit͢͢ ±∞ and an Index of Reflection equivalent to that of Refraction(Asymptotic to a Limit͢͢͢͢ ∞). Kind of hard for a Laser to damage something that it cannot “Touch.” The Metamaterials also have another property that is going to mess up a LOT MORE than just Laser Weapons. They are invisible (or can be made invisible) to any kind of EM based Detection we currently use (Vision, Radar, LiDAR, etc). Sonar would still work, but there is a possibility that the Metamaterials could be created to function the same way with sound. Leaving few options to detect them. Dirt on them might be detected visually, but it, nor “scratches” damage or affect the Metamaterials in any way, because their properties aren’t derived from the traditional “Optics” of Lenses or Mirrors. Mass remains the only real way to detect them, and currently Mass Interferometers tend to be many square miles in size. And they are only capable of detecting mass along the plane they are built on. Very scary “plane” you’ve got there as a result.
@rolandolveda906 Жыл бұрын
My craft goes into air and underwater and runs on a power you wish you had . 😂
@proteusnz99 Жыл бұрын
Mach 9 and highly manoeuvrable? Get real, at that speed it will travel in straight lines and turn slowly, otherwise the g-force will flatten the pilot. Also, where is the fuel, it’s smaller than the SR-71. As far as I know Dark Star was the program name for a small forward swept drone, cancelled in the late 1990s. The white aircraft about midway is clearly the recently rolled out X-59 QUESST proof of concept vehicle. The generally breathless presentation is reminiscent of the AWST articles about Soviet nuclear powered bombers in the late 50s/early 60s, cheer leading for biggest Air Force budgets. More likely a cleverly managed misdirection exercise, with the movie tie-in to ‘explain’ Skunk Works activity, a bunch who’d long been good at keeping secrets. In terms of reconnaissance satellites or drones make more sense. I’d be more interested in seeing if Lockheed was collaborating with DARPA and the AI community to develop drone swarms with autonomous capabilities.
@zora_noamflannery2548 Жыл бұрын
- You bring up some good points.
@msrousan378610 ай бұрын
Saying the SR71 was a fighter proves how uninformed the narration is
@Ihave15childreninmybasement7 ай бұрын
Fr
@dinhscot Жыл бұрын
USA has the money and the technology to make the best fighter jet in the world... Its military spending is more then the Next 10 countries combine, those list include China, Russia, India etc...
@TheBruces56 Жыл бұрын
The SR-71 is not a fighter.
@aw4955 Жыл бұрын
Maybe no fighter, but missiles certainly can. No weapon system is invincible.
@scottmclaughlin5674 Жыл бұрын
My kids and I had the honor of seeing the Mock-up from the Top Gun movie at the Edwards AFB open house air show in 2022.
@brenly7054 Жыл бұрын
They make alot of classified projects in dream land Nevada they proble built this long ago just like the aurora and sr71 by now they are probably working on anti gravity program because you can only fly so fast without a heat shield friction at the speeds talked about would cause damage and would cost to much to constantly maintain
@Godsangelishere Жыл бұрын
Like the TRB3?
@mothmagic19 ай бұрын
Mach 10 is all very well until you want to go anywhere other than in a straight line.
@TomokosEnterprize8 ай бұрын
How long to the moon ? LOL.
@mycroft167 ай бұрын
At that speed why would you need to go anywhere other than a straight line? You just plan a grand circle route to your target and once there slow enough to maneuver if need be. Once mission complete align heading and accelerate again.
@user-pr1gx8zw8h Жыл бұрын
Very nice❤
@AnthonySanchez-if6wdАй бұрын
I'm so impressed with the Darkstar! Why hide it? Scare enemies to the peace table!
@brianflanagan3845 Жыл бұрын
Isn't the F35 a modern copy of the British Jump Jet?
@OpenCourse556 Жыл бұрын
Seen as how the US already has the Harrier, it is beyond just a copy.
@proteusnz99 Жыл бұрын
No, the F-35 is not a copy of the BA Harrier, that had a single engine with vectored thrust, the Pegasus. The F-35 is conceptually closer to the Soviet Yak-38, but replacing the forward lift jets with a large fan. Looking at it, I was reminded of the comment of an Israeli pilot evaluating the F-14, after walking around it and counting all the moving bits he decided he’d prefer to go into combat is something a bit simpler. The F-35 is undoubtedly ingenious in packaging VTOL, stealth into one smallish airframe, but resistant to battle-damage? It’s a bit expensive to be regarded as expendable.
@kornfed81 Жыл бұрын
It wasn't revealed. Everything in Top Gun was CGI. The takeoff at the beginning was an overlay onto a Hornet if I remember correctly.
@dangerwillrobinson366 Жыл бұрын
Yea you ought to research how TG was filmed.
@kornfed81 Жыл бұрын
@dangerwillrobinson366 yea I just watched the interview of the pilot that did the most demanding flying for the film. He said he wouldn't do it again.
@MatthewBaileyBeAfraid Жыл бұрын
Damn the producer of this is incredulous.
@ioanbota9397 Жыл бұрын
Realy I like this powerful fastest planes I wil like to have infinit numbers
@fanman42302 ай бұрын
A fun video. A lot of CGI from the movies and an interview of Richard Dewar who is the Manager of Next Generation Technologies for BAE Systems taken back in 2020 about the Tempest project. I bet the Skunk works were as surprised as everyone else at this video.
@pinaychallenges...13993 ай бұрын
Thank you america and other allies to supports in west philippine sea...
@ranjanshaw5518 Жыл бұрын
7th Gen onwards the fighters would be Unmanned, Hypersonic,with Directed Energy Weapons.
@ultimagaming6035 Жыл бұрын
Forget all the other bells and whistles…the shit is unmanned?! Thats awesome.
@geraldsmith7240 Жыл бұрын
You Should Not Underestimate Anything, When It Concerns Skunkworks.▪️◾️⚫️
@Poparox65922 ай бұрын
That is fact brother.
@mrgcav Жыл бұрын
I touched a SR-71. It is still Awesome.
@davidrobertson5700 Жыл бұрын
BAE systems ( Bacon And Egg systems) own the tic tac. Project greenglow Good luck rest of world 😂
@jasonbull6560 Жыл бұрын
Can I be honest, there is no way you can drop or fire anything with such a platform. I totally agree it would have too be high energy weapons. Were nowhere near this, close but not yet.
@grantsapain Жыл бұрын
Darkstar is a reconnaissance aircraft, not a foghter..
@oldconspiracydude236 Жыл бұрын
It still has to avoid missile defence systems especially air to air. if a missile is coming straight at your nose your 7500 mph works against you.
@50buttfish10 ай бұрын
ONLY cartoons from movies of hollyweird jets; how did the one on the flight line get there, without ANYONE taking a video of it. CGI is great for the lame.
@RenoLaringo2 ай бұрын
''It turned out to be so impressive (and secret) that it was featured in a movie''.....yeah right! 😅 Coming soon ''Elvis lives in Antarctica''.
@charlesrichardson8635 Жыл бұрын
Carrying a 350Kw laser? The engines would have to have waste alot of energy ALL the time or there are going to be ramp speed issues. OR the super capacitor to hold that energy for use is going to be big, too. As for super maneuverable... There are physical limits to breaking or moving a hypersonic air cone that is right on the skin of your craft. The redirection is going to take miles because of the "bite" of the control surfaces or propellant necessary to change direction (to change pointing direction and then to apply the vector thrust to get it arc into the new path) is going to small because Newton's first and third laws are not going to be happy. So the engines of this beast would have to generate enough force to accelerate it and it has to be very light to keep M low to allow a high A or a huge F that requires energy and either very short flights. There is no free ride in F=MA and then add air resistance. AND you want to fire a 350Kw laser more than once a day. Sure. Can't wait to see it one day, but they can't be using aviation fuel.
@charlesangell_bulmtl Жыл бұрын
Well, FINALLY a commenter with tech content So many of these 'mouths' only save social or gaming garbage CHEERS
@franciscohernandez44882 ай бұрын
I build the best fighter-bomber and fighter-bomber ship and It would be the best of all the ships because it can go out into the atmosphere
@RenoLaringo2 ай бұрын
Lol😅
@darrenlucas2768 Жыл бұрын
I think I know the pilot.....a Mr Flash Gordon
@oneloveeduardo Жыл бұрын
Make sure if you create a jet that it has the ability to have hypersonic Nuclear missiles. Hypersonic flight. With the most powerful lasers available. Mandatory All 3. There's no sense in having to say we should of. Just get it done, please thank you. God bless.
@Silverfox8668 Жыл бұрын
Ssssshhhhh…. Keep it low profile. Hope China, N. Korea, Russia and Iran are not watching your video. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 I enjoy watching your videos….👍🏻🇺🇸
@technews_official Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU
@erichammond9308 Жыл бұрын
Guaranteed that this is the same tactic used by the military with the F-19 model by Revell - what it really is is something totally different 😂
@thomaswolfe4824 Жыл бұрын
The SR-71 is not a fighter. This sounds be lot of over hyped.
@williamburroughs9686 Жыл бұрын
Looks like the revied the P-38 lightning. I knew that this build was better than the standard aircraft but didn't realize that they that they done it until now. P-38 to SR-71 to SR-72.
@1421ZH Жыл бұрын
Wow!2.24 it looks like US has 6G already !
@aurus7245 Жыл бұрын
If no fighter jet can beat the darkstar how'd i gun it down with a MiG-21bis
@RiverBanks38 Жыл бұрын
The “Darkstar” is only that great if Tom Cruise is at the helm!
@bjmgraphics617 Жыл бұрын
Make it into a star fighter and you'll remove the G-forces that affects the pilot and all the pilot to do is slow descend back to Earth. But the poor pilot has to suffer the pressures until reaching space.