Hi ELLIE! Could you put a link to the senate hearing or other vids you use in the description? That would be awesome!

They could land on a Hollywood Moon back in the 60's, they can land on another Hollywood Moon today

what a narrow minded Americans! the only thing in your mind and also you think in Other's mind is DOMINANT. We Chinese, is thinking how to benefit for all mankind. try to think like a grownup! giant kid!

Rebuilding Saturn 5 wud be a Step in the Right Direction. Also Stop the Unfair Hiring Policies

My God, you're promoting highly processed food? When will you be promoting Soylent Green ???

美国人是否曾经登月，对中国人来说，其实并不重要😊 中国只是必须在月球建立基地，如果今后我们在月球看见了美国人，一定会请你们来中国基地吃饭的，当然是中餐😊

You must be watching a different video.

@@phil20_20 Well, we are talking about same person : Nelson

shame on american !! retribution time is coming !!

The same Nelson said he didn't know what's the point to go to the 'dark' side of the moon, because it's always dark there. What do you expect from him？

For the 2 trillion dollars that they spent on Afghanistan, NASA could have build 3 bedroom apartments on Pluto.

Politician's souls be weighed down by gravity

Wars benefit the politicians and the military industrial complex in the US. The space program brings nothing to them.

Agreed, I wish we could use the money we are spending to sustain other countries and use it for our space program and people. Almost 100% of the countries who receive money from the US should make it on their own.

@@matthewfusaro2590 It's not 2 trillion, it's way more than that. Because that number does not include interests.

Next, China will build a permanent base on the moon, which has already begun.

The Chinese can do what they say. If you look at the route planning of their lunar exploration program, it has been successfully completed. It is of a very high standard.

History has proven the Chinese aren't afraid to lose a few (million) people (or Sparrows) to reach their goals.

They cant. The radiation and the fuel problem cannot be resolved.

There no "probably" . they want to establish a research base there and Russia is joining them

US passed law in Congress forbidding US cooperation with China in anything relating to space program quite a few years ago. Europe also tried to play out China by accepting Chinese contribution but barring their participation. These left China with no choice but to go on its separate ways independently. Now, China has a better and more accurate Bei Dou Navigation Constellations as well as a very successful space program! Arrogance will ultimately cost USA dearly.

Oh sure, lol. China is friendly.

@Thunderbyrd. It’s hard to fathom other government are more friendly than your own’s right? Yeah cause you lost your faith in your gov and hates them doesn’t mean ppl in other countries are like yours. 🤡

@@Thunderbyrd. Oh sure, LOL. Just look at how many bases in the first and second island chains!

China is not friendly, it's 200% aggressive, they just hide their motif and make sure countries they "help" (blackmail) don't speak about it at all. The reason you see a lot of 'cooperation' recently is because they can think long term, since they're a very very old civilization. They can see the future if automation and AI, so they know their power will soon dwindle as the reason everyone and then to manufacture their products there is because of all the slave labor they're using. Once automation kicks off, anyone will be able to make cheap stuff almost anywhere in the world.

That's telling tales of Neil depressed gloomy looks in press conference

Mister Neil Armstrong said that only 50% was true about the whole thing on his Deathbed before Mister Neil Armstrong passed away. You folks make your own conclusions as to what Mister Neil Armstrong meant about what meant what he had said right before he passed away. I personally feel that has the best Movie Studio in the entire World called NASA STUDIO! Just saying.👍🙂😅😂🤣

I can see Nelson just wants to enjoy his fat check salary till he die, why bother to do such a hard job at his age?

No, but it does mean trump is right, Americans are not as great as their grandparents

@@zomgneedanameI did not know your grandparents enjoying more precise satellite images, better telecommunications (WiFi) including in the space, and much higher computing power! 😂

Amazing, isn't it? At this stage, we should just time travel back to the 1960s, and it would be much easier to land people on the moon like they "did" back then. 😀

@stheworldturns: "Too many never tested technologies worked flawlessly when Apollo 11 landed on the moon's surface for the first time ever." FYI, those "never tested technologies" had ALREADY been tested in Apollos 7-10, not to mention on the ground. Oh, and BTW, the lunar lander descent stages have been photographed from lunar orbit by the Lunar Reconssaissance Orbiter stheworldturns: "Radioactive moon dust..." FYI, moondust isn't radioactive. Nor was it "somehow was wiped off clean before astronauts got back into the lander". Lunar dust was got inside the lunar landers amnd was regarded as major problem. The rest of your post is equally ignorant.

They lost the good video too! Some idiot taped over it to save money!

🤫🤫🤫

ha ha magic show of 1969

Ironically, it was NASA that provided the first pictures of the dark side of the moon.

@@matthewfusaro2590 And earth rising from moon surface

​@@matthewfusaro2590wrong, the Soviets did in 1959 with Luna 3 spacecraft.

😓

FYI, it's not DARK side, it's FAR side. And it's not in dark. When it's faces sun, it's a day on far side of the moon.

It is actually bright. Just that we cant remote control anything on the other side to really go there. The chinese are resolving this issue now.

It's hard to strike any base on the other side of moon. Chinese will dominate the whole Moon.

Excellent point!​@@vitalitihomirov5781

Yeah, I have never been there, how I know

USA will put 100% tariffs on China moon landing and that will solve it

Then Christopher outsource the cgi to Chinese😂

As long as it's not Michael Bay

Pretty good idea 😂

Artemis++

NASA should , give up on Rockets . focus on Marinating launch sites , & expanding where it makes sense.

lol! Artemis 2 1/2 Then Artemis 2 1/2 ++ Then Artemis 2 1/2 ++ Part II Then Artemis 2 1/2 ++ Part II episode 2

@@kenjifox4264 😂

You were betrayed by your youthful naïveté and betrayed by the Nixon administration. Basic logic says that if we can’t do it today, we didn’t do it 20,000 days ago. Nixon wasnt a unique lunar leader, he was a uniquely brazen liar.

But if you watched the moon landing as a 10 year old haven’t you already seen the moon landing in your lifetime? Or are you claiming they didn’t land on the moon is 1969 (with 1960’s technology)

Me too brother

@@Jonathan-Sundgood question

He let the cat out of the bag🤭​@@wowcnmovie

Cause it was a Hollywood landing is my guess as of late. Starting to doubt we landed

In the old days, people had much more balls and got to the point! Nowaday, we have a lot of "procedues" and way to much "meetings" with hollow talks. We should stick to CGI, much cheaper and safer and much more CO2 neutral! 😂

Way harder to fake nowadays.

​@@kalliste23you got the point. It will leaked to the internet in no time. And the Chinese and Russian will hack to see the secret, and will expose it all, or worse will hold the secret for ransom. 🤣🤣🤣

The first landing mission's underlying motto was "we can't afford to fail" and SpaceX's motto is "fail until we succeed."

美国人是真的天真😅

Bcz it's all new untested technology.

因为你们造假你们登月了啊 就比如你们欧美造假各种历史一样 比如你们造极埃及 希腊等的历史

@@hugh_jasso new? It's not new, shouldn't it be evolved? What, we are basically learning how to build a boat all over again?

They're trying to do things differently with new tech, it will take time, if it works...the benefits will be long lasting

@@hugh_jasso Are you saying that old technology is better than new technology?

Oh shut up

Do you also believe that the Earth is flat or that Noah built an Ark?

Exactly this, US never went to the moon. The flag that flaps and the shadow that’s different than sun’s light. It just shows these pics where done on Nevada desert

@@inkbold8511 Gee, how did the best scientists of the Soviet Union miss something so obvious ? Or are you so ignorant, you don't even realize the Soviet Union accepted that the moon landings occurred, as does every other educated person on the planet.

Oh look, another high school dropout whose never passed a physics or math course in their life is here to lecture us on the properties of a vacuum, another youTube Nobel prize winner /sarc

There are older impact basins where older lunar soils can be collected.

​@@user-ex4kq1df9mdamn, you are smarter than the administrator of NASA! 🎉

@@bojin5163 🤭👌

​@@bojin5163he believes it's always dark too.

行政官员不懂技术层面的问题是正常的，但是美国登月最大的质疑是为什么50年前能登月，现在登不了了

What does Boeing need to invent? Or is it they are assembling proven designs and hardware.

Boeing needs to focus on its Aircraft and forget about Rorting the NASA Budget …

Dump Boeing. All they've shown is that they "used to be" good at spacecraft.

Boeing have wasted $ Billions to deliver nothing of value.

Boeing is doing great with their Military Space Plane. (X-30 something? ) Maybe they should go that direction but with a commercial space plane.

China can't even find their own borders! They keep changing year after year, always bigger.

America never landed on the moon, it was all a hoax.

Shut up

It's a great sequence. SLS and the Orion capsule are not required, SpaceX could do it alone, with NASA paying the bills.

Can i ask you one thing, why do we need to refuel in orbit when we launched a single rocket directly towards the moon? These refueling steps are ripe for failure, why add additional steps?

Don't forget also "Apollo 26"

Technology doesn’t regress for 50 years relative to the moon while it advances relative to everything else. Space may be the final frontier but it’s made in a Hollywood basement.

Exactly.

It is by far more likely to get the program canceled if you have only half the government behind it.

Yeah, having "the whole of Government" behind big ideas has not always worked out so well. It often results in the "law of unintended consequences" rearing its head, because Governments and those working in them have vested power and money interests that often blind them to reality.

I stated it in the past, and it was also about timelines. It generally takes 20-30 years from conception to design to production for spaceflight successes. It's OK to have timelines and milestones, but when they are constantly presented publicly and not reached, then doubt sets in about the entire program. 😉

China knows these difficulties in Artemis.

Okay, I can see your point. Let's take a look at the two theories. SpaceX is using the software engineer approach, build, test, iterate, retest. Boeing is using classic aircraft design theory. However in Boeing's case they have chosen very expensive materials. Therefore a lot of their testing is done in computer simulation. The real world really doesn't care about computer simulation. The ultimate punchline? Both will reach the same conclusion, how quickly and at what costs are what isn't known.

The reality is Chinese boots will land on the moon first followed by America's afterward. That'll be a very big shame ！

Thank you so much! And the recovery has been really great, all things considered.

I agree, more of these please. You need to focus more on serious interviews and discussions to increase your credibility.

Artemis , is already outdated Design.

Thank you for watching!!! It means a lot!

Why use Orion for that test when Dragon is available? Ok, Orion has to be testet. So send an empty Orion to LEO as a Starship payload and then dock it with a dragon with astronauts. The astronauts move to Orion, undock from Dragon and then dock the Orion to HLS. They test the HLS controls, move back to Orion that again docks with Dragon that lands the astronauts to earth. No $2 billion SLS needed, a lot of good training learned.

This is a huge difference between the NASA that went to the moon and today's NASA. Engineers used to be driving the bus, now they're cowering in the back while Management gets the bus stuck in a swamp.

​@@ghost307It sounds like the missing link between ancient Egyptians and modern Egyptians😅

Why don't you ask an expert like Thunderf00t aka Dr Phil Mason and Common Sense Skeptic (CSS)? They show all the math and all the logical contradictions/inconsistencies (i.e. HYPOCRISIES, LIES) of Elon Musk that you are too stupid and lazy to go through. This Eric Burger knows nothing.

They focus hiring based on diversity instead of merit.

​ @ghost307 That’s because NASA in 60s have white men using Hollywood studios to makeup footage of fake moon landing. Hence 60 years later you still don’t know how to make moon landing and only this time you can’t fake the landing anymore as the Chinese are prepping for actual moon land.

Yes, great interview

Glad you enjoyed it!

I’ve messaged him to try and interview him He is too busy for me 😂 But yes- he released an incredible video on the topic!

He is all over NASA, and for good reason. He used LOGIC. Sadly, I doubt he will ever be invited back. And that's in his favor because Dustin is Not a political scion.

@@jameswilson5165Well he recently posted a video about his dive in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab. Pretty sure that was filmed after his speech.

“Smarter every day” is a funny concept. 20,000 days ago people were walking on the moon (if you trust the Nixon admin). How have we gotten dumber for 20,000 days if we are smarter every day?

Yes, so Apollo heat shield was better than this.

Except the minor issue of Apollo 1. NASA has negligently killed 17 astronauts. 17! They are rushing again to salvage their reputation

Don't even fly yes three get cooked in a test........!!!!!!!!!!! In the old days the US never have such capability to send man to moon........!!!!!!!!!! You tell me that the US landed in the moon with bus side cracks computer and space craft shift.........!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Apollo never have heatshield cause they never need to fly up to moon, they drove to Hollywood studio to film their moon footages. Only this time they can’t fake it anymore as the Chinese are actually prepping for moon landing.

Contradiction ?. The more problems NASA has on the moon exploration, the exposure of incompetent set in.

Glad it helped!

Glad you enjoyed it! He’s great at explaining concepts

Can’t wait!! Hopefully IFT 4 also comes soon

50/50 at the moment in Vegas. Starship IV Starliner I completing thier mission against starship orbit reentry? Any takers?

If you think SpaceX is gonna catch a rocket out of the air using hydraulic chopsticks, I have a bridge to sell you... Cheap!

@@wyattnoise yup

I’m sorry you feel that way. I tried to make sure the audio was equal I’ll make it even quieter!

"a bit" is understating it... was difficult to pay attention when eric was speaking. music is not at all required when you have a great guest like him on.

@@ellieinspacemusic sounds fine to me. Doesn’t get in the way.

You are so welcome! Glad you enjoyed it

Thank you! I promised I’d make something good once back from Japan!

This just convinced me that America is just not as capable as it was 60 years ago. Would would you expect when you have a man pretending to be a woman as second in charge of Health and Human Services?

Thank YOU for watching!

Yes, but too bad about the bad sound. Very unprofessional.

​@@bjs2022Sound was fine on my end

@@Virtueman1 Yes, if you don't mind the reflected sound from the hard surfaces that are typical of a bathroom.

Lmfao, no way the Americans Landed on the Moon in 1969

@@chasx7062 Agreed. Like, in 1958 Americans sent their first satellite to space. Zero to hero in 11 years 😂

Always a compliment to hear, that’s a good question from an accomplished interviewee!

You have no idea of how much gullible are out there!

你应该去怀疑美国🇺🇸登月都是造假的 因为1969年根本不可能登月 技术 能源 辐射 等 都解决不了 现在也没有很好的解决 你认为美国🇺🇸登月过吗 不可能 m

Well, there isn't much useful purpose to manned spaceflight besides gettiingg to say that you did it! We would be much better making discoveries with robotic missions until we find somewhere worth sending humans to!

The current split of duties is good: NASA does the human safety and mission stuff while SpaceX provides transportation.

Tesla has those, how did he lie?

Showing Buzz Aldrin? Much?

NASA's Mission Statement is not Mission-centric.

@@douglasstrother6584 Correct...it's a leftist, DEI, Social Justice political statement. It has nothing to do with innovation or scientific progress.

The need a black person on the mission to be the local guide on the dark side of the moon (in da hood, bro!)! 😂

Thank you!!! He definitely is a wonderful resource

Thank you!!! Very frustrating seeing delay AFTWR delay

He’s honestly such an incredible value to the Space community

If they ever get Orion to work right. It’s heat shield has the potential of breaking and destroying the parachute.

For Artemis II, right?

@@ellieinspace right

That would be great! The only problem is the return velocity. Dragon would need much fuel, to get to equal speed and dock with Orion. And then the same amount of fuel again to slow down again for reentry. Werner vonBraun had the idea of a second very small space station in a very high orbit, for the moon transfer ship to dock. The crew then goes into a transfer ship that only ever goes between the high orbit and a low orbit space station. That was planned much larger than ISS. From there they simply board a Shuttle to the ground. At that point, the SpaceShuttles were thought to launch and land twice every day. Oh, the crew for one Moon mission would be 100. Yes, 100 astronauts for six weeks stay.

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx good point, i missed the fact that Orion does not simply comes back at transfer velocity and gracefully parks into orbit like Star Trek... lol ... Orion would have to shed velocity by atmospheric braking, defying the whole purpose of my proposal to not risk the heatshield/reentry while crew was still on board... How good that i am no NASA engineer 😬...

Thank you!!! 🚀

Omg I’m so sorry, both!?!?

@@ellieinspace motorcycle vs left turning tow truck

Yes I feel like we're more waiting on SLS rather than Starship at this point. Orbit achieved is an absolutely massive achievement and this means we are literally most of the way to the moon

Not sure why a lunar orbiter is needed for the first missions. Is an orbiting station needed at first? I don't know all the issues involved but does the following work? It does assume that Lunar starship has enough fuel to do roundtrip from LEO to landing on the moon. 1. Fill up refueling tanker in earth orbit. 2, Launch lunar starship with Humanoid robots on-board. No humans. Tesla will have robots working in factories in 2025. 3. Re-fuel lunar starship. 4. Fly lunar starship to the moon and land. 5. Have robots unload cargo and do some setup with solar power for recharge. 6. Fly lunar starship back from the moon to LEO. Robots stay behind and recharge from solar. [First moon trip has now tested all systems] 7. Refuel lunar starship. 8. Launch astronauts with Falcon+Dragon and Dock with lunar starship. 9. Launch resupply starship and dock with lunar starship and transfer cargo for next moon trip. 10. Re-supply starship returns and lands back on earth. 11. Fly lunar starship to the moon and land for first Human trip. 12. Fly lunar starship back from the moon to LEO and dock with Dragon waiting in orbit. 13. Dragon returns to earth. Steps 1-6 prove out moon mission using Starship before risking humans. Could even do it a 2nd time for confirmation. Would probably still be cheaper than SLS but congress would probably bark because less NASA money flowing to their states & districts. But nothing prevents SpaceX from doing this mission as a test program for Mars.

As soon as you say 'save money' you might as well pack up and go home.

@@littlewink7941 instead of implying shutting off the money spigot by saving money, let’s just say more bang for the buck on money spent. Regardless what NASA does, China will use the lunar ice to create a self sustaining moon colony with a cost effective infrastructure that launches large quantities of lunar exports into orbit

Exactly. And what happens if something goes wrong then, those astronauts are goners.

@@spicesmuggler2452 that's always the issue when you're landing on other celestial bodies. This idea that you'll go to the Moon and work on the base for 6 months is a bit of a fallacy.

@@mattpujol4787 But the good thing is that you can escape the tribulations and say God isn't real on the Moon.

SpaceX cannot even keep a payload in orbit

@@MegaWilderness ouch

@@MegaWilderness , 5 thousand Starlink satellites say you are wrong.

@@jameswilson5165 And not a single one deployed by starship which is what we're discussing

​@@MegaWildernessYet

Chinese too have plans for what they call International Lunar Research Station. They are developing Long March 9 aka "Chinese Starship" as a reusable rocket for sustainable moon presence. But just for the beginning they will use "oldschool" Long March 10 rocket. Which is, basically, a lot of Long March 5's stacked together but with new quadruple engine they tested couple of days ago.

The USA is basically starting from scratch because the people who did the Apollo missions are either too old or dead. All those vehicles had “secrets” to getting things right for safety and just to get stuff to work. The paperwork archive details how it was supposed to work. The gone-guys knew how to make it work.

The Van Allen belt is the reason, humans can’t safely pass through it (although we did in 1969, it must be true cos I saw it on a grainy black and white tv image)

​@@Jonathan-Sund😂😂😂好莱坞大片👍👍😂

The Rocket Ranch guys even made Bulent Alten's space goulash for dinner one evening. It was an amazing experience!

I can’t wait for his new book!

In a word, No.

Nope.

He got angry and annoyed and punched that guy 😂

Like barf me out, man. That is the dumbest post on the internet. (BTW, the first part was sarcasm, in case you could not figure it out!)

Thankfully, the main business working with NASA now is led by an engineer.