Blood on the Clue Tower

@@MultiClassGeekclue on the clocktower

Cluke on the bloodtower.

@@scyobiempire4450 Glue on a clocktower

​@@noahclaycameron Clock on the Gluetower

It fits with one of the movies endings lol

"Why shouldn't we get away with it?"

You know what would have been pretty funny? None of the players were the killer. The butler did it (obviously).

@@ColonelSandersLite okay that would be hilarious because paranoia would have made them turn on each other while the butler watches

Absolutely. He's got the 'curt bow of either professionalism or seething resentment' nailed down.

There is no one I more wanted to be professor Plum than Jon, so it seems like so far the casting choices have been fantastic!

And I must say, looks rather dashing in that suit

Potentially? :P

he feel like he's the type of butler to have cleaned up some bodies in his day for sure.

Chelsea!

Chelsea!!

Chelsea!

Chelsea!

Chelsea!

Maybe it's just because I play the game a lot, but I thought that Jon continually guessing Miss Scarlett would have been a dead giveaway that he had the card in his own hand.

@@scdwolfboy I agree, because Sullivan knows that Jon must have seen Miss Scarlett the last time he guessed, the only reason to continue guessing the same card is because it was correct (which Sullivan knows it wasn't) or because you have it in your hand. In this variant especially since you don't know who has the card and thus how far around it got so your guesses would be literally be valueless.

While correct, it was possible for Sullivan to think Jon kept asking for Scarlett cuz Laurie kept showing him everything BUT Scarlett. Either because Laurie could be trying to help Sullivan or just unravel Jon -both equally likely 😂

​​@@SorwestChannelbut jon guessed billiards room and rope alongside Scarlett. Sully knows jon must have been shown miss Scarlett

@@Siennarchist oh did Sullivan choose how to kill Mr. Boddy? I must have forgotten that info if so. I assumed Sullivan only knew he was the killer, not the place or weapon.

Getting killed first just freed him of any obligation to play the game, leaving 100% Doing A Bit.

I said the same thing 😂😂😂😂😂

Expectations met and exceeded! 😃

Comrade Mustard

A coward's character

Just wait til you realize for the title!

In America, he was called Mr Black

I thought the victim was called Dr Black?

@@MrSamBerrett1 I checked this on Google and he was Dr Black in the UK and Mr Boddy in North America.

I don't know if this is a "back when I was a kid" thing or a British thing, but the dead man was always Dr Black when I played. If it's British, we lost the pun with Mr Boddy but kept one with Cluedo.

Okay but it should obviously be called "Shoedo"

@@DasGanon Shoe-Done-It.

The Gum-shoe Game

...or the soup-of-the-day at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Where do I sign up to have Laurie tell me both of these things?

In reality the body is just horribly mangled and was assualted with each of the weapons as a diversion technic to make it harder to find the cause of death

Also, you should easily be able to learn which room it was. "Okay guys, our host has been murdered. Now lets go find the body"

@@travisperkins9920 I think the idea is that the killer can just. move the body.

@@travisperkins9920 The body (of Body, in some versions) is found on the central staircase, which is why many versions of the game show the chalk outline there

Also, very handsome

They all kinda fit their roles very well

If you’ve watched the movie, he looks like Mr Green

House Rules began as a Co-op hosting and is certainly the best that way.😊

Yeah and its a great addition. It was always strange how the series started with having only sully in the videos.

@@loganb7081 💀 lmao, oof

Upgrade tbh

@@loganb7081wait I genuinely have no idea what happened to the other guy?

omg trex for monopoly let's GOOOOOOOO

"Ms. Scarlett, with the revolver, in the Ballroom." "The zombie goes down." Or. "You fumble looking for a gun. Unfortunately, you don't see one and are promptly eaten."

@@dragonkingscott the more I think about this idea, the more I realize it’s just Resident Evil 1

Not at all balanced, but fun lol

nice 👏

That’s wicked.

+

I think it was lozworth. as in, like, lozzie (a common nickname for Laurie, to my memory)

I thought the butler's name was Wadsworth in the Clue movie.

@@killer_rabbit42 It is, but the L is for Laurie.

@@killer_rabbit42in the play, that’s what it is

IDK which ones you've been watching, but that's rarely ever the case. It's always for fun and to raise the stakes in a different kind of way, not to be purposefully unenjoyable or "painful".

I mean, I guess the Monopoly is "painful"... but still for the fun of it. Otherwise why would they continue to do it over and over again?

@@KaiLucasZachary Connect 4 begs to differ lol

Movie? :o

@@SuperMichael996 oh yeah theres a cluedo movie, and it has multiple endings too

Well as it’s American it went by Clue

That's what I thought too when the cards were shown !

Billard boyz is a dfferent era one is banished from online and the other is rarely on the main channel.

I couldn't see much with the glare.. Note, I do also agree with the still looking good without a hat

After watching some, I realized it is a slightly diff game...

I believe it is the guessing part of the killer as a win condition was really hard. It just felt really hard to guess what room they are in and a card in their hand, which makes Sullivan killing two people impressive. While having enough rounds to kill everyone in this game, we seen at the end of the game guessing what room they are in is the hardest part. So there was plenty of time to collect information on who did it. Things I would probably change is the killer will know how many people are in the room with him, not who with him/her just how many if any are in the room with him/her. Secondly, the killer doesn't have to reveal the cards in their hands. This removes a lot of information from the game for them to spread misinfo. Though when theyh kill of another player the cards become unlocked. So as it comes down to the last innocent can start narrowing down the missing information. A third thing I would do is spread the dead player's cards face down in different rooms like the two rooms that players can check if they are in that room. Something for the innocent players, is when they check the card it will get revealed to the table as public information the next round. Meaning the have a turn to move before the killer gets a chance to kill them. Stuff I would experiment with is the killer being able to kill someone in the same room as them without the guess of a card in hand. Maybe the killer can swap the face down cards on the board with one from their hands or remove the card from the board completely. Thematically it being the killer planting or destroying evidence.

i think a possibility of adjusting this is such that the killer's hand is always the other players' cards. that way the non-killers can't immediately know who's trustworthy by being simply dealt that card. you could also adjust the rules so that when guessing, players are always shown weapon/room (if possible) before being shown suspect (if possible).

Yes... because he just saw someone give a guess and not get any cards back in return.

Tilly, with an ice pick.

I see absolutely no reason why they can’t do this often with more tweaks to balance gameplay a bit more. Absolutely enjoyable!

4 Scorpions and 1 Virgo (Blair).

@@lucone2937a scortet then!

Nah, looks more like Mrs. Dave.

for the same reason you don’t give away all your information in regular clue. if everyone tell the table all their cards, there wouldn’t be much of a game left, and the next person up would automatically win. yes, they’re technically playing as a team, but the threat of death means that there’s still motivation to be the correct guesser

@@mvwinf if you're playing selfishly I suppose, but no its not even remotely comparable to normal clue in that regard lol. One is a team game in which you all win by giving your info, the other is in individual game where you want to share no info

@@imdadirtydan I think in this case, any given information would help the killer as well. not to find the truth, of course, but if you guess plum hall wrench and you say you saw hall, then the killer knows you’re actively in the hall rn. and if you say you saw wrench, then the killer can narrow down their list of people who might have that card. if someone corroborates you, then it’s already down to just two people. I do see what you’re saying, though - it’s hard to turn a solo social deduction game into a team one

@@mvwinf The killer doesn't have time to kill all of them because they're already found out. That's the fundamental issue with the game. They have almost all of the information to begin with and there's no reason not to share it other than possibly dying, which isn't an issue if you just figure it out using all the info to begin with. Even if they don't do this immediately all the dead players cards get flipped, so by the end of the game there's no way you don't have the information to figure out who it is.

@@imdadirtydan this feels like a very utilitarian view of the game to me. in social deduction games, there’s always a chance anyone could be lying. if you all go around the table and say your cards, there will be discrepancies, and it may not be obvious who is the cause of said discrepancies. so you wouldn’t be able to automatically trust any information you’re given. also, not least of all, that just doesn’t sound very fun? if the game was only figuring out who the murderer is using the cards you’ve been given, it would be werewolf with layers of unnecessary steps. part of the fun is playing detective, even if it’s not the most efficient gameplay strategy