STALKER 2

Didn't this happen the same time that most of the east coast went dark for a long time (lol)

@@wolfcatsden that was first energy.

When they hear an explosion

haha. i imagine that training room key that was turned to load an emergency training scenario similar to a key used to run fire drills, but may have more than 1 scenario when turned on. this technology is fascinating, not to mention how much work goes into running the power plant.

Comerade Jay ! Rbmk reactor dont explode

That's not possible, an RBMK reactor can't explode!!11!

Your delusional

Send him to the infirmary

Lol

1:23:45 Explosion

you expected chernobyl

Nah, our shutdowns actually shutdown the reactor rather then turbocharge them.

Lol I understand the joke

Clean, under which rock do you live? Putin's press secretary?

@@AndreasDelleske how is it unclean?

@@UJustGotGamed Have you ever heard about nuclear waste? Is there a terminal storage now, 70 years after they started. No.

@@AndreasDelleske Around 95% of the nuclear waste produced is low-level waste, which includes tools and clothing exposed to radiation, and a lot of it can be safely recycled, or stored even in landfills. When it comes to high-level waste, long-term storage of it is mostly a solved problem, as shown by the Onkalo repository in Finland, which is complete and only needs a license to start operating. I heard that in the US there are plans for a similar repository, but until then, dry cask storage will be safe for many decades.

@@niasty9377 I'm laughing: After 70 years of twiddling thumbs, NOW they are waiting for a "license" - a license about what? That we built airplanes without spending a thought about landing gear?

i would bet that reactor control training room equipment is woth millions of dollars, which is a drop in the bucket compared with not knowing what to do during an emergency like a meltdown. Chrrnobyl is an eerie reminder of how dangerous meltdowns are.

@@ooommm4024yeah, although it’d be pretty hard to achieve a Chernobyl like event on a modern western reactor

The Cherenkov effect...🤣🤣

@Sironii I didn't! It was just the water tank. Akimov blew it up with his incompetence.

yeah comrade

@@anatolydyatlov963 I blew up the core in my RBMK game :/

@@Thxtnt You should've pushed AZ-5

Let's hope they start up fast enough and aren't below sea level💀💀

​@@TheNavalAviator03/11/11

@@varahunter68 26.04.86

there was a minor interferance in the neutron

how do you know? do you work at power plant!? O_O

I think this is a china syndrome reference 😂

bobl78 which is a S.C.R.A.M. (Single control row axe man)

Close, S.C.R.A.M. means safety crontrol rod axe man, it ties back to when the first experimental reactors had directly controlled absorber (control) rods. The man on top of the reactor operating these could "cut a rope" to drop a central rod which should alone absorb enough neutrons to cause a negative reactivity coefficient/subcritical assembly (meaning the last time generation has more neutrons than the current) and bring it into a hot-standby (shutdown after load with the primary coolant still hot and pressurized). This is clearly a "The China Syndrome" referrence, although it's not quite right.

Are you implying that would cause something to happen? Delusional.

In a western reactor this wouldnt cause any problems.

me

Me

What... you came here from Roblox? Scram is a real thing LOL.

@@veritateseducational217 I fucking know dumbass that's why I'm here

No

Not exploded, emergency shutdown

Of course not... its not even an RBMK... And next time... explain to me how an RBMK explodes... =) At the end no one could believe it because there is no vessel who could... its the same reason why there is no containment...

Not really, CGS is a different type of reactor than Chernobyl was. Different systems and controls.

This simulation isn’t an RBMK, it’s a PWR (I think)

@@seth047 its a BWR

@@Cat_578 oh ok, thanks.

Yeah very electro mechanical, compared to what will go into the newer fully digital systems.

@@CardelliFamof8 yeah i can them being a problem then what they used to be my town has a natural gas fueled power plant ran by pso ive been to tour but i doubt itll go on for long

There are no RBMK's in the US. This is most likely a BWR 5 model (Boiling Water Reactor 5).

You can download complete rbmk chernobyl simulator

@@fichtltuning But where?

@ pojďme mluvit česky.

@ normálně do youtubu zadáš rbmk simulator. A vyjede ti tam hidně videí. Jedno má v názvu 2.0 tak se koukni, a potom ho stáhni. Pokud budeš mít potíže tak mi napiš na ig : chernobylak1986

Can you say Simulator? Go ahead, try it . SIM YOU LATER

nope because all scrams should theoretically work as long as theres backup power, the only reason chernobyl exploded was because of the graphite tips on the SCRAM rods

No SCRAM is a trigger for explosions, not even in Chernobyl, it exploded there because many security protocols were previously violated. Reactors 1,2 and 3 were also shut down and did not explode.

@@araujofi The scram _did_ trigger the explosion, and the particular state the reactor was in where the EPS-5 button changed function from "shut down reactor" to "explode reactor" (which is something that should obviously not be possible in any sane reactor design) could easily have happened without violating any security protocols. The key ingredients were the state of the reactor fuel (high fuel burnup) resulting in low operating reactivity margin, having recently operated at high power, and then operating for a while at low power (200MW) before hitting EPS-5. To quote Annex I to INSAG-7: "The Operating Procedures permitted operating conditions similar to those prevailing at Chernobyl Unit 4 on 26 April 1986 and they might have occurred without any intervention on the part of the personnel. We only need to assume a perfectly possible situation in which triggering of EPS-3 occurs when the reactor is operating initially at rated power with an ORM of 26 manual control rods. Under these conditions, approximately one hour after triggering of EPS-3 the ORM could have fallen to less than 15 manual control rods at a reactor power of 200-300 MW(th), and any further action, whether automatic or remote, to shut down the reactor could have led to a similar repetition of the events of 26 April 1986."