Best Sci-Fi tanks - Warhammer 40K, Halo, Star wars, Starcraft

Рет қаралды 6,838

26 күн бұрын

Here in this video we will compare four battle tanks from four universes, namely the m850 tank from Halo, the Baneblade from 40K, the TX 130T from Star wars and the Siege tank of Starcraft. We will analyse each of their sizes, speed, armor, weapons, crew and battle doctrines and then come to a conclusion on which one is best. So, firstly, The Siege Tank is a versatile and heavily armed vehicle used by the Terran forces in the StarCraft universe. It features two modes: Tank Mode and Siege Mode. Then the Baneblade is one of the most formidable super-heavy tanks in the Warhammer 40,000 universe, used by the Astra Militarum. Its thick armor and powerful arsenal make the Baneblade a behemoth on the battlefield, capable of turning the tide of war. The Star wars TX-130T, also known as the Fighter Tank, is a fast and agile repulsor lift vehicle used by the Galactic Republic during the Clone Wars and then later by the Empire and even y the rebel alliance. Its speed and maneuverability make it excellent for rapid strikes and support roles on the battlefield. Lastly, The M850 Grizzly Tank is a heavy armored vehicle used by the United Nations Space Command (UNSC) in the Halo universe. Designed for frontline engagements, Its thick armor and powerful weaponry allow it to take on large groups of enemies and fortified positions.
---------------------------------------------
Credits:
M850 Tank Halo 3D - sketchfab.com/3d-models/halo-...
Video - • Halo 3: Grizzly Tank D...
TX 130T Starwars 3D - sketchfab.com/3d-models/tx-13...
Video - • TX-130 Saber Tank Game...
Baneblade Warhammer 3D - sketchfab.com/3d-models/baneb...
Video - • Retribution Baneblade ...
Siege tank Starcraft 3D - sketchfab.com/3d-models/starc...
Video - • THE TANK -starcraft si...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. Nutbug does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-nuttbugchat@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 105

@williamjeffersonvillena5979 24 күн бұрын

At a first glance the Baneblade in specs would outlast all three competitors with its heavy armor and powerful weapons but looking at its opponents I can't helped that notice none of the other tanks used are in any way comparable to the Baneblade, the closest would be the Grizzly Tank. Besides each of this tanks perform different roles the best example would be the Siege Tank the Terran's, of Starcraft, primary tank but if reading the lore their more used as a mobile artillery and with the ability to jump high ledges, plant mines for defence and have armor that self regenerate it could in theory if performs a mostly hit and run tactics placing itself in high places to snipe the baneblade. The TX-130 is mostly a light tank akin to a scout vehicle, more equipped, but its fame has always at its speed and if its one-vs-one then it could use its speed to circle around the tank and hit its behind. As for the Grizzly I'm not knowledgeable enough to comment

@congnghequansuvn474 24 күн бұрын

200mm of armor, what a joke, all tanks in these setting use extremely harden futuristic armor, especially Starcraft Neosteel

@congnghequansuvn474 24 күн бұрын

cannon is also stupidly small

@congnghequansuvn474 24 күн бұрын

also range and mobility far behind that of the seige tank

@Swiff-RR 24 күн бұрын

TX-130 for the win!!!!!

@Swiff-RR 24 күн бұрын

Mass production overclock!!

@brandindeangelis5040 24 күн бұрын

Terrible comparisons. You have a Star Wars armored scout vehicle, a Halo heavy MBT, a Starcraft multi-role siege tank, and a Warhammer superheavy tank. The only 'competitor' in this that would stand a chance against the Baneblade would be the siege tank, and that's by continously going to siege mode, firing a few shots, and then switching back to tank mode to RLH before the baneblade can get into range. The TX and the Grizzly don't have the sheer range to do that even if they have the speed. A better WH40k tank for this matchup would have been the Leman Russ, which would likely lose to either the Grizzly or the Siege tank (grizzly in a stragiht fight, seige tank in the same way that the baneblade 'lost') but would likely kill the TX because IT'S A SCOUT VEHICLE. The TX isn't a competitor for an MBT, because it ISN'T AN MBT... A fair comparison for the TX would be against the chimera/sentinel/taurox from 40K, the Halo warthog, and maybe the vulture or Hellion from starcraft, fights that it would easily win but are at least technically fair because all 4 are scout/fast attack vehicles. Although, as I'm typing this, I just wondered about a TX vs Diamondback matchup, which sounds interesting...

@voomvoom4522 24 күн бұрын

The Grizzly is not a MBT. It's a superheavy. The Scorpion is the MBT of the unsc.

@commandoepsilon4664 24 күн бұрын

I don't know that the siege tank's siege cannon out ranges the Baneblade cannon, it is certainly possible though I think the only thing that can be said for certain is that it could arc it projectiles over obstructions which the Baneblade can't do, but that's highly dependent on terrain. Though you are right that this selection of tanks make no sense to compare to each other. SC doesn't even have an MBT afaik, the 40k tanks should be the Leman Russ, with Halo using the base model Scorpion. If this was a scout vehicle comparison then 40k wouldn't be using the Chimera or Taurox, they are both IFVs. The sentinel technically meets the requirements and while the Imperial Guard don't really have a scout tank a better fit vs the TX would be the Hellhound. Though as a flame tank it wouldn't be very good in a tank on tank fight, you could sub in a Devildog anti-tank variant, though I'm fairly certain the Hellhound is way more common.

@edgarcrack5280 22 күн бұрын

@@commandoepsilon4664 the terran "tank" could be the marauder, but it also count as heavy infantry, the diamondback is the closest to be the terran tank but didnt make it.

@brotherkhrayn3525 18 күн бұрын

To be fair though, back in the Golden Age of Technology, the Baneblade was a scout vehicle…

@voomvoom4522 18 күн бұрын

@@brotherkhrayn3525 thats a myth actually.

@nobleman9393 24 күн бұрын

You could have used the Rogal Dorn tank instead.

@Neoth40k 24 күн бұрын

He's not as iconic as the glorious BANEBLADE

@lennymegakill9580 22 күн бұрын

Or the workhorse of the guard the leman russ

@kaspersaldell 21 күн бұрын

Nah

@shanavalkyria3438 20 күн бұрын

you know i have over 50 warhammer 40k books, a few of which are tank novels but i don't recall about hearing about a dorn tank. i tend to focus more after the horus heresy though. Gotta look that up now.

@kaspersaldell 20 күн бұрын

@shanavalkyria3438 The Dorn tank is brand new. The model was just introduced for the first time, a year or two ago.

@TheDemigans 24 күн бұрын

I’d go for the Siege Tank. The big factor is the Baneblade here. The Grizzly and Star Wars tank don’t have the combination of firepower or armor to go toe-to-toe with the Baneblade, and against the Siege Tank the Star Wars tank doesn’t have the durability while the Grizzly would be a case of who manages to hit the other first. But the Siege Tank has that siege mode. Against a Baneblade this is perfect, a siege tank against a slow moving fortification with non-LOS shots? Great way to damage and eventually destroy it. Add the ability to defend itself, the mines and it’s maneuverability and that Siege Tank takes the cake in this contest. Has the most chance of winning or playing equal against the other tanks. The fact that it’s mass produced also cannot be understated compared to the more unique low production models the others are.

@congnghequansuvn474 24 күн бұрын

200mm armor, what a joke

@09Eagle 19 күн бұрын

That gun ain’t penetrating the armour due to the material it’s made from, don’t matter how many times you shoot it

@TheDemigans 19 күн бұрын

@@09Eagle which gun are you talking about exactly?

@09Eagle 19 күн бұрын

@@TheDemigans siege tank gun, due to the fact that I doubt that it could penetrate ceremite although I’m unfamiliar with the StarCraft universe

@congnghequansuvn474 19 күн бұрын

@@09Eagle neosteel is better than ceramite

@ugobrignon1741 24 күн бұрын

Dude idk from where you take our informations but change. The light saber TX-130 repuslor tank is a scout tank use for hut and run tactic or fast Assault. He have 1 dual heavy laser canon down is maim hull, 2 lasers canon or two beam canon turet and anti vehicule or infantery missiles. +He have a shield generator capable of tanking Proton canon ammunition. I really thinking this video is just here to prove than 40K do a thing better. Because the Baneblade is a super Heavy tank and not the three others, Come one if you really want a fight 40K have the Leman Russ, the Malacor and the Rogal Dorn. Or you know than the Leman Russ and the Malacor are to weak armor support vehicule because compare to the three others univers the tank of the imperial guard are expendable and cheap az fuck.

@JacatackLP 24 күн бұрын

Yeah the Leman Russ should’ve been the 40k tank in this comparison.

@user-fp3in2kf3b 24 күн бұрын

You miss with Star Wars because this is more like heavy tanks comparison

@williamjeffersonvillena5979 24 күн бұрын

I think the closest comparison would be the Clone Turbo Tank

@yellomellow9481 24 күн бұрын

@@williamjeffersonvillena5979 Thats more like..heavy heavy 😂. I'd say the Republic hovertank. Let's use the RX-2000 or UT-AT.

@Swiff-RR 24 күн бұрын

UT-AT is a walker

@Swiff-RR 24 күн бұрын

Crawler basically

@Swiff-RR 24 күн бұрын

Star Wars tanks are divided into four types based on propulsion: walker, hover, and wheeled and tracked (the most rare is the wheeled and tracked)

@sim.frischh9781 24 күн бұрын

The recoil of one gun being used to reload another that is interlinked with it, is called the "Gast-principle" and was used in WWI already, though it got replaced by other systems as that weapon was not reliable enough. Later, the Sovjet Union got fond of the system and Russia uses some until today.

@dragonlord498 23 күн бұрын

think siege tank seems most versatile overall guess could call it the goldielock tank of these pretty good speed, armor and weaponry with it also working as artillery as well as a relatively standard tank and also fairly cost effective and easy to produce despite its capabilities then their is also some advanced versions as well to consider as well which are just overall better such as stronger weaponry and able to jump up cliffs and such

@globalcitizen8321 23 күн бұрын

In all cases, a javelin like weapon with top attack mode would be able to defeat them

@krazykaijou1398 20 күн бұрын

Video Idea can you make a video of the Combine vs the impearl stormtroopers

@yellomellow9481 24 күн бұрын

Could've used the UT-AT or TX-130 Sabre (modified) with the mounted anti-tank/double or single barreled cannon turret for the Republic.

@followersith5813 22 күн бұрын

Comparisons a little out of place, but anyway let's try to make a ranking. (Maybe no one will care.) The TX 130 is an armored reconnaissance or infantry support vehicle. So excellent speed and maneuverability, but little firepower and resistance, I don't think it has any particular sensors. In a direct battle he would lose against the other three, it would be wiser to try to hit and flee. The siege tank is more versatile and certainly robust, but specific for certain scenarios, destroying enemy positions, fortifications and zerg swarms. Like the M850, however, it has a major flaw, its configuration and movement systems. M850 is the one that could fare best in a battle between real armored vehicles. Fast, sturdy and with a lot of firepower, but the twin guns are bullshit (like all sci-fi universes that use twin-gun vehicles.) They take up space, strain the turret mechanisms and are of no real practical use. It has too many vulnerable points, such as tracks and a hull that invites weak points to be exposed. Finally the Baneblade, Very slow but resistant. Designed to operate in teams and with the support of other smaller tanks, with relative infantry support. So it works, the guard has to hold the line. In appearance it is the most realistic of the four. (It seems absurd since it's Warhammer.) From multiple sources, we know that some have centuries of battles, they are seen as small works of art by the Mechanicus. It seems to me that in a couple of stories, hypersonic projectiles or at least 1500m/s are mentioned. We are talking about a projectile of at least 7-8 inches, it would have a kinetic energy of many tens of megajoules. Not to mention the rest of the arsenal. If I'm not mistaken, in Fire Angel, a Baneblade is lifted off the ground when hit, the ground has hundreds of meter craters, but the crew survives. Then another small factor, the Bane blade has more men, sure only two seems convenient, but what if things go wrong? What if a bullet or laser beam injures and kills a crew member? So my overall ranking. TX130 - M850 - Siege tank. - Baneblade.

@Mastermav11 22 күн бұрын

Grizzly for the win

@bennuredjedi 24 күн бұрын

Halo weaponry makes no sense, they are essentially 21st Century weapons dressed up as future weapons but are no better than the ones the military use today, for example the weapons and tech from Star Citizen Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare and Advance Warfare are better than what's used by the UNSC in halo

@kryvex4996 23 күн бұрын

Agreed. Honestly, just look at helldivers, that's the tech level I feel like the unsc should've been at by the time the covenant showed up

@bennuredjedi 23 күн бұрын

@@kryvex4996 exactly

@esculpiendo 19 күн бұрын

Solo que hoy en día ya tuvieron avances tecnológicos considerables Que si los asen competir, pero esto es más gracias a la alianza con los elites que por mérito propio

@mr.madness925 22 күн бұрын

Nice video, but why the Baneblade and not a Rogal Dorn or Leman Russ? The Banebalde seems to be way out of the weightclass of this video

@yellomellow9481 24 күн бұрын

Star wars uses plasma, its been discussed a lot. Also, the top turret is able to cut through material like butter almost (similar to a saber I believe).

@Ms13unknown13 18 күн бұрын

Yeah, but the siege tank can hit targets going at incredible speed from great distances, the rest would be scrap metal before they get visuals and mines.

@yellomellow9481 18 күн бұрын

@@Ms13unknown13 The halo tanks turret can aim almost vertically and match closely to said turret movement speeds. TX-130 was a very poor choice to use here, but if they used the elite or other concept variants then it would've dominated.

@TgamerBio5529 24 күн бұрын

Grizzly in my opinion would be the best tank when it comes to flexibility and armour.

@commandoepsilon4664 24 күн бұрын

Just one problem, that absolutely hideous center track. It's an abomination and I hate it.

@oscarenriquesampedrolopez3655 18 күн бұрын

If you want 40K to win yes use the Baneblade, but it would have been a better comparison with something more size to the rest like a Leman Russ, a Predator/Gladiator or even at the limit a Rogal Dorn. There is no point in comparing a light tank, a hybrid system and an MBT with a superheavy from a setting where building limits are just a suggestion

@montypython5521 24 күн бұрын

I'm surprised a Baneblade and Grizzly are pretty much the same size.

@_Xerota_ 23 күн бұрын

And then you got the Rhino, which is a little bit bigger than a Grizzly.

@Desco51 18 күн бұрын

@@_Xerota_And then you got the Capitol Imperialis, wich is... BIG

@_Xerota_ 18 күн бұрын

@@Desco51 The mammoth from Halo 4 probably isn't as big as that, but still not something to scoff at.

@esculpiendo 18 күн бұрын

@_Xerota_ 28 metros y un cañón Mac de 22 metros, pares indefinidos de torretas anti infantería blindaje de titaneo de aproximadamente 67,8 cm Y un equipo de espartans 4, Con posibilidad de llevar unos vehículos en su interior como warthog o escorpións y cantidad se personal reconocida. No es poca cosa

@chrisjohnson1146 21 күн бұрын

Honestly it probably would have been better to select tanks that fill similar roles to try and determine which were better. And honestly comparing anything to 40K is rather hard due to the OP nature of the universe. The Baneblade is an unfair matchup for the most part because its a superheavy. Throwing the TX-130 at it is pointless in every category except speed so it is an unfair comparison. I'd say a more fair matchup would have been the Leman Russ in comparison to the Grizzley or Scorpion and the Siege Tank, and probably swap the TX-130 for the Trade Federation AAT.

@Rawkit_Surgeon 9 күн бұрын

Don't bring a tank to a battlewagon fight.

@RoadKamelot2nd 22 күн бұрын

None of these four is half as good as the Battletech Manticore. The Manticore has the armour to withstand AC/20 hits (300 mm autocannon), its primary weapon is a particle cannon which doesn't run out of ammo, as it's fueled by the tank's reactor, has at least as much range as the Starcraft Siege Tank and is impairing the targeting sensors of whatever it hits. Its secondary weapons include an long-range missile launcher with 10 tubes, giving it excellent support fire/anti-aircraft capabilities and it also has an short-range missile launcher with 6 tubes.

@deadman9335 Күн бұрын

I don't know much about star wars or star craft tanks, but you could have also used the mammoth mk3 which would have destroyed all of them except maybe the star craft tank, I don't the durability. But people really under estimate the Grizzly as it could destroy a bane blade, which is just a poorly designed tank in nearly every way.

@Bake-kurijra 21 күн бұрын

You forgot the battletech behemoth tank in this . It could one shot a baneblade

@elyaszabri5007 18 күн бұрын

ITS THE BANE BLADES!!

@silentwolf6555 24 күн бұрын

What about the centurion from gears of war?

@esculpiendo 19 күн бұрын

¿Estas comparando un tanque con la misma potencia qué los actuales Contra tanques del milenio 40, un tanque con casi el triple de su tamaño, (GRIZZLI) y uno que utiliza plasma Y otro que es una combinación de tanque y artillería?

@quocbaole467 24 күн бұрын

the baneblade at it peak in the dark age of technologies was consider a light tank not a super heavy nowaday LOL even the light tank beat the crap all of other tank

@TheDemigans 24 күн бұрын

Bit of an unfair comparison. It’s not about what they used to be, it’s about what they are now. And right now they are a rare superheavy tank. And if a Siege Tank gets the opportunity, that Siege Tank will win against a Baneblade. There’s a good reason we stopped making slow superheavy tanks in the modern age, and “accurate artillery” is all of the reasons (well maintenance, cost and sub-par performance are also reasons).

@artofwar3deutsch869 23 күн бұрын

Sorry but the baneblade was not a scout Tank during the DAoT. That is a missconception

@myduckisonqauck7227 23 күн бұрын

Thats fanon, not canon

@swordsman1_messer 17 күн бұрын

This isn’t a good analysis video for comparing the factions. The Siege Tank and the Baneblade are diametrically opposed doctrines, whereas the TX is the Baneblade’s design opposite. If anything, you should have used the Leman Russ for 40Ks representation, and go no further than the Rogal Dorn. Those would have been the closest analogues for the other factions, as a Baneblade would be a contemporary for the UNSC Mammoth, or Star Wars’ Juggernauts doctrinally speaking.

@TravisSwan 21 күн бұрын

Kindly compare fruits of the same type with each other. Comparing melons, apples, oranges & berries for a theme is a sign of poor analysis.

@commanderminh7402 24 күн бұрын

*IT IS THE BANEBLADE!*

@congnghequansuvn474 24 күн бұрын

baneblade was a joke, siege tank is better

@jakto3362 24 күн бұрын

@@congnghequansuvn474 nope.

@aksel8228 24 күн бұрын

Hello

@thorshammer7883 24 күн бұрын

Every Imperial military group in the Imperium of Man would love to have a super heavy fortress armored vehicle that can solo entire Chaos ground base armies in the tens of thousands at a time like the Bolo Mark XXXlll, the Armor Core 6 mechs and mining platforms, and the Supreme Commander ACUs from the Supreme Commander Series of games within their arsenals and ranks. It would boost their military capabilities by a astronomical amount to beat back entire Tyranid Hivefleets out of the ground. Even the Adeptus Mechanicus would be unable to resist the temptation of human technology to forsake them. A Magos would look at a ACU and all it's production applications like this while divided with Omnissiah technology restriction doctrines. "I don't need it, I don't need it, I definitely don't need it. I don't need it. I don't need it. I don't need it. I don't need it..... IIIII NEEEEEED IIT!!!!!!!"

@voomvoom4522 24 күн бұрын

They do. It's called a titan.

@thorshammer7883 24 күн бұрын

@@voomvoom4522 Titans don't build massive matter replicating production armor facilities like the ACU does. An ACU is like a combat ready always operational STC that can replicate the blueprints for nearly anything for combined arms warfare. The Tyranids won't be able to compete for long with that on the ground. The Bolo tanks are alot more powerful in warfare then people give credit for. Their arsenal and speed and durability and shields is essily some of the most powerful utilized armors in Science fiction. Unlike the Titans you don't need legs and worry about your upper body balance tipping you over. For the Bolos are tank shaped with massive stacks powered with such horse power they can get around the battlefield and keep up with the armies quite quickly. And their shielding systems aren't going to go down that quickly. Their bulit to holdfast against nuclear tier attacks. As for Armor Core 6 things some of the structures and the way weapon systems are used in Armor Core 6 put Titans in the old technology block. There are mechs that fight huge skyscraper to mountain sized machines like it's a anime shonen battle and there are mining equipment machinery structures that's almost 40 km in length and width. Easily bigger then the usual big primarch capital battleships. Those are some insane engineering feats that even the Adeptus Mechanicus would find exceptionally impressive of the scale of these machines and how they able manage to manufacture them so quickly even compared to their pace.

@voomvoom4522 24 күн бұрын

@@thorshammer7883 i don't know what an ACU or a bolo tank is but ok.

@thorshammer7883 24 күн бұрын

@@voomvoom4522 An ACU is a powerful matter replicating devise from the Supreme Commander Series. And the Bolo Mk33 tank is from a series called Bolo.

@voomvoom4522 24 күн бұрын

@@thorshammer7883 Huh. Cool. Though they're probably no match for Tier 5 mindustry units.

@user-ox8pz7yn8c 21 күн бұрын

Canderous-class assault tank Star Wars opponent Baneblade and not tx-130.

@edgarcrack5280 22 күн бұрын

if u are comparing tanks, use standar tanks, the grizzly and baneblade are super tanks. a better selection of tanks could be the leman russ, the scorpion, idk about the TX 130T, and the diamondback altought this last one isnt a standar terran vehicle, never make it out of testing

@Neoth40k 24 күн бұрын

Scorpion and Grizzly are on par with Leman Russ and BANEBLADE fight me on it

@voomvoom4522 24 күн бұрын

No. 90 mm cannons are tiny.

@JohnDoe-cz2ti 18 күн бұрын

Мощь 11 стволов

@amxhwvhmvawx2735 24 күн бұрын

Best tank in Warhammer 40K is the Fellblade. Much stronger than Baneblade.

@alejandrozapataq 2 күн бұрын

Those are terrible comparison subjects for several reasons: Tx130t is technically not a tank, it is a scout vehicle with antivehicle capabilities, thats why is so fast and has no armor at all. Starcraft siege tank is the only vehicle in the comparison that can actually work properly in a battlefield but will barely do its job due to several design flaws, the multitrack being the worst, also there are three generations of the siege tank: the general, the arclite and the crucio, they have the same purpose in the battlefield but they are very different from each other so saying starcraft siege tank is not that much. the Grizzly even when it is cool in design it is probably one of the worst tank designs in gaming, which sums up halo tanks in general, they are not functional, they have a ton of design flaws and weaknesses and they would very likely be ovewhelm by modern tanks. the funniest part is that the grizzly is an "improvement" of the skorpion to have a breakthrought role but it is worse in every way posible than the skorpion. All warhammer world war 1 like designs are functionally terrible but from them i dont think baneblade is a good example, i cant believe im going to say this but the leman russ is probably the best candidate for comparisons. To compare them you need to rate all their characteristics from a realistic perspective because they only work in their universes because of the power of the plot

@Rezail_Uhhh 21 күн бұрын

This is a wild match up... Why no lemon russ vs all of this?

@ice111110 24 күн бұрын

This video is comparing a Star Wars light tank, a halo heavy tank, and a heavy tank from StarCraft. Then for Warhammer it’s a Super Heavy tank, so the fighter tank and baneblade aren’t really comparable? This whole video is geared towards making Warhammer win for basically no reason. It’s pretty silly.