You are the best!!! Love the facts-based content.

"In their mating & migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the KKK." - Joseph Sobran

Appreciate this perspective. Just try being nicer to California next time. It means a lot to me :c

How realistic is the reality where state officials could leverage tax revenue etc. into financing solutions out of these crisis without economic backlash and perhaps other issues?

As a resident growing up in California in Orange County - notoriously conservative - this video is not surprising at all. When people have money and they suspect their property values, school performance, and 'way of life' are at risk of changing they will NOT take a chance on bringing in new construction. In their minds, as long as the 'poors' are kept away from them and out of sight out of mind, at least THEY will be ok. They won't have to deal with homelessness, dirty streets, 'projects', etc. It's outdated, incorrect, and frankly not forward thinking - but that's what they are thinking. When it gets bad enough it will continue to spill into their neighborhoods and their own families will never be able to afford housing (and we see this happening right now)

Everyone who has children feels the same way

@@kevmoful no, they don’t want crime living by them. Because poverty inherently increases criminality due to desperation, and lack of resources and opportunity. The thing is, “I don’t want my children living by that” can’t be the way you vote, unless you want to make it even more likely that your children’s children will live by that. Because, you see, this pattern of voting will only serve to intensify poverty, crime, and civic unrest.

@@elijahgavin6706 people choose poverty in our current system. Our politicians are trying to force it on us with inflation and other things but for now poverty is a choice.

The funny thing too is republicans are pro school choice because we understand that freeing up the market would create competition that would drive the quality of education up to at least some semblance of reasonable. The "democratics" are anti school choice. The quote from the former vp Brandon is that he didn't wan't his kids going to a racial jungle

We'll, yeah, what do you expect, the truth? "I hate poor people and I want none of them around me." Republicans are constantly demonized for things like this. Bill Burr called this out about a decade ago. The only difference between the Reps and Dems, is the Reps are a little more honest.

This is just pure propaganda, there is no journalism here. You people are so starved for confirmation bias, you will just take everything. Lol, grow up.

@@diptarkadas5193 Can you please develop on your view? What’s the propaganda in this video according to you

@@diptarkadas5193 what propaganda? Open your eyes kid

My God, how dumb are people? This is Marxist propaganda you fool.

@@diptarkadas5193 dude I’m a lefty left left person - calling out power imbalances and hypocrisy is fr a great thing

You might as well go watch some Alex Jones or 9/11 conspiracy videos now because the point is that well educated people aren't stupid. They know that Democrats and Republicans govern almost identically. They know that bureaucrats are getting rich printing money for a few monopoly contractors. They know antitrust is dead, that most of the Bill of Rights are meaningless. They know that economic policies exist as an arm of capitalist exploitation, as a gig in and of itself, and not to address them. Or go through the same BS I did and think that there's a political struggle happening that will produce sincere reform. (Not that it's not possible, just that it isn't coming from the Democrat/Republican Brand politicians.)

All that said, I've never felt like there are more opportunities and I love being alive. If that sounded too gloom

This is a pretty misleading (potentially dishonest) video. The way data is presented at 8:38 is just horrible. If you actually go to the reference "Who Pays? 6th Edition - ITEP", you will see the following: The Most Regressive State and Local Tax Systems: Washington, Texas, Florida, South Dakota, Nevada, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Arizona, Indiana... The Least Regressive State and Local Tax Systems: California, The District of Columbia, Vermont, Delaware, Minnesota, New Jersey, Maine, New York, Montana, Maryland.... Noticed any trend here? Now go back to 8:38 and see how Johnny Harris presented data in a misleading way to support his claim of "Liberal Hypocrisy is Fueling American Inequality" This is terrible Journalism.

​@@bohanxu6125I think you missed the context from before the 8:38 mark. It could be that "regressive" is not being used in the same way by everyone using it. This has been happening A LOT the last few years and it's usually the left side that is changing the definitions of words to fit their narrative. The right does it too, but nowhere near the same amount.

@@smania7575 The wording doesn't matter. I don't care about labels fundamentally. The video is trying to imply democratic states actually have less progressive taxes than republican states (ie the hypocrisy). However, if you look at the reference that he gave, the data points to the complete opposite direction. However, he presented the data and spoke about it in a way that implies otherwise. It is just straight up misleading, and potentially dishonest.

The last house I bought was built in 1905. Neighborhoods like that just aren't being built anymore. I don't remember the last time I saw a new house (built this century) that was less than 1000 sq ft. Builders have abandoned the working class.

You guys keep voting for it 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Too much Fox News, I see. I am not my state's keeper...... Or rather, not all so-called "Californians" are whacked out democratic party supporters. When you're politically outnumbered in the nation's most populated state, there is not much you can do about it except find a way to escape.

@@pimpinaintdeadho No, they don’t actually. They vote for Democrats who oppose their own NIMBYism, like Newsom. All while voters clearly indicated their support for Proposition 13, for example.

@@pimpinaintdeadho You underestimate how powerful an incentive being a holy martyr is to these people who want to be called "decent, good, compassionate, etc." This is why they will never vote for anything that will humiliate them or make them uncool in any way.

Yeah. California is screwed

Lol that's could be said by a lot of groups. That's also the motto of the GOP and all liberal elites who don't want to pay taxes.

"If you're consuming a lot...Pay your fair share of taxes" - NESARA

lol

California public policy is a big factor as to why housing is so expensive there. They have some of the strictest zoning laws in the country and were representative of a disproportionate rate of overvaluations and subsequent mortgage defaults.

@@SimGunther the way to so that is to transition from income taxes to consumption tax. A national sales tax is far more fair to everyone, you pay the government based on what you spend instead of what you earn.

I meant refuse to agree to disagree my bad

That's gecause the uk has shadowed usa politics, particularly since Reagan. Look at the state of things now,n the reasons for brexit and all the same right wing talking points culture wars and divisiveness that's been adopted from across the pond✌

​@@bereal6590 Reagan got most of his ideas from Margaret Thatcher, not vice versa lol. She took office before he did and began implementing monetary policy and supply side economics. They both were implementing the same policies but Thatcher got there first.

Hope springs eternal

Right?!

Has to be an ulterior motive to it

Yeah, I still don't... 🤔🕵

This is purely for appearances and damage control. Nothing more. They are solely being allowed to appear objective in order to survive all of the garbage "reporting" they've been doing for years and to survive the resentment America has for them now more than ever. The media has logged more unprecedented failures in just the past few months than any other time in history so now they're pulling back from it as if they haven't been the cheerleaders for all of it.

Actually, while I agree. America needs a new party. Both main parties are corporately owned.

@@meephead6636 Consider the Forward party or Libertarians.

@Lynne Hughes not exactly

The whole world is not Republican or Democrat. Please stop pretending this is how people are really divided. These are the two choices the rich want us to think we have.

@@Misaka-gt5yj libertarianism scares me. Feel like if we got them as a 3rd party they’d immediately become corporate owned specially by ppl like the Koch brothers

You, clearly, have not read NY Times articles, especially ones that aren't opinion pieces. Read an investigative reporting piece. Widen your horizon, get educated about he world.

I'm not sure why Democrats aren't "Left wing"? This is the way socialism or socialistic policies have worked since the beginning of civilizations. They always fail, they always make more poor people, always make the population in general poorer, always have a small class of uber wealthy, and the ruling class are always liars and hypocrites. So, this is exactly how "Left Wingism" HAS worked and IS INTENDED to work.

It’s incredibly frustrating whenever I am called a liberal or part of the democrat party for my left wing views. I am neither a liberal or want to have any part with the Democrats.

Middle class suburbanites in a nutshell

They wanted to ban plastic bags where I live. My mom was like "No plastic bags, at all?" I said "Mom, but if it's bad for the environment..." and she voted in favor of it. So yeah, not true.

Everyone is conservative about what they know best, their personal lives

@@futurestoryteller lmao cool story

@@SouthJerzVillains I seem to be missing the part where proving somebody wrong needs to be impressive.

choose a keynesian authoritarian or a keynesian authoritarian

It's almost like the elite like keeping the status quo while the poor suffer.

Left wing and right wing - Two wings on the same dirty bird.

I can’t stand either political party, but saying they’re the exact same isn’t accurate.

It's not a matter of choosing a guy who "does nothing" the issue comes from lobbying and their "supporters" (big businesses) who expect benefits for supporting them. Once they get into office that's it. They know it is very VERY hard for them to be pushed out and so their primary concern isn't keeping their word to the people, hence why people put lawyers and politicians under the same roof of being the biggest lairs, but keeping their obligation to their "supporters" which paid millions, if not billions, in helping their campaign. Then the media doesn't cover them, so long as they don't hate them anyway. What do you know about Obama's presidency and his policies he put in place? What do you know about Biden and his policies? Probably have a hard time with those right? What if I ask you questions about Trump? Probably not as difficult right? The media covered him every time he passed gas. The system is corrupt and a LARGE part of it is the media and the system of lobbying.

Exactly

On point

Virtue signaling

Idk, what's your definition of values?

They tell you to live the opposite way they lived.... But really it's a class divide as usual.

I kept looking for the twist… but no, seems like someone is actually asking “are we part of the problem?’

@@nickhoffman4039 The twist is they labeled it "opinion", even though it's chock full of facts.

Yea they've made a good few things like this. Actually enjoyable. Look out for the opinion pieces, they are usually good.

@@curiousing good opinion is, of course, sustained by facts.

Yes, it's nice that NYT is pointing out leftist hypocrisy. But this video is still reinforcing and encouraging the leftist perspective.

Serious question. How does the videos explanation of Washington's tax break down work if Washington doesn't have an income based tax system?

Except now, apartment buildings are being bought by companies and the units are SOLD as condos rather than rented as apartments, which means us poor folk are squeezed into an even smaller renting market...which drives up the prices. I live here too. Seattle has fallen.

thats the opposite of what should happen ,why buy bigger pants when your still wearing a smaller size ,the country is too many thanks to the liberal policies giving America away to whoever will vote to keep them in power

We just sold our house in a beautiful small town in central California. We sold it because they are forcing high density apartments into our beautiful neighborhood. Vandalism and graffiti are already showing up !!!

Just trying to get some credibility back after the way they covered the Trump presidency.

Red wave

@@sebastianleja3461 Let's do a similar piece on Republicans and conservative states. I mean, you'd be fine with it, right?

Your name is very befitting

Okay go for it....

-Everywhere. I lived on a street with 80-90% virtue signal sign ("in this house we....") coverage. A local moonbat was pushing for a homeless camp to be in the park nearby and our street facebook group exploded with discussion about why it is not a good idea and should be elsewhere etc. A conservative pointed out it was residents of another area pushing for it to be by us. Can't make this stuff up.

California isn't inundated with homeless because of housing. The homeless are coming to California for the same reason they are going to Seattle: They can camp on the street, buy drugs easily, use drugs openly, defecate on the street, and steal from businesses without fear of repercussions. There is a reason Walgreens is closing some of its stores in the Bay Area.

Doesn't help that other states literally funded one-way bus tickets to offload some of their homeless to CA...

NIMBY's

Here in europe we have in average 10 parties, all them totally different. In USA you only have 2 far right wing parties choices to vote.

yes, so unlike NYT, i'm growing my respect for them back.

Oh they are terrible too. Neverending wars, tax cuts for high income earners, legalizing institutional corruption etc. #YangGang

I highly doubt that there would be anything made, like this video, about the Rep. Party. it has always been opposite-standing authors who write pieces like this one, about the opposing party.

@@wenpatxczcvzcsfc well the majority of the republican party refuses to receive any real criticism of itself at this point, even from fellow conservatives, so yeah i doubt it.

@@shayla4007 same goes for liberals and the democrats... if you critize them you turn out to be an "racist" , "homophobe" and all that jazz

lmao true

He might as well be part of Map Men

Everbody gangsta 'til Johnny pulls out a map

He loves his maps almost as much as he loves starring into my soul

I miss borders

NPR staff would start frothing and convulsing if you made them watch actual journalism.

Same here in Copenhagen, the city has been run by the left for 30 years and affordable apartments for " normal" people like school teachers, nurses, student and others has only been build in super low numbers while politicians say all the right things to their voter base. Extremely disappointing and hypocritical.

Funny because they live like that, but push their politics on places like Alberta which are absolutely 100 times nicer to live and work in as things are set up to succeed and develop wealth, not just inherit it.

you live in a WOKE City Under UN agenda puppets usurping Canadians

Except at least in Canada the education system IS funded provincially the way he suggests, so it lessens the inequality between school districts, at least from a funding perspective.

Same in Ottawa. But our city council is typically 50/50 split between urban progressives and conservative rural districts, which leads to stalemates on things like roads and transportation, public services and utilities, and waste management. It's not fair to try and shoehorn the whole city into paying for municipal services that some will never use, like central bus services or a green bin program, or subsidized housing, but it impairs the areas that really rely on those policies to function. I've worked in urban development for years, and the best solution I can see is a removal or relaxing of zoning bylaws in key areas. It costs four times more to redevelop a lot in the downtown core than it is to have environmental impact statements and surveys for untouched green space for tract housing developments, and it's exacerbating problems with commutes and social infrastructure that existed before those communities were built. Tourism pushes mental health services and shelters away from prime real estate, and biking infrastructure is incomplete and often dangerous to cycle along. People claim they'll use these services if they're made well, and every time a new suggestion is made, the city blows the budget in consultation fees and costly joint ventures with private partnerships that never lead anywhere. NIMBYism is the bane of sensible urban planning, and it has really damaged any prospects of achieving popular consensus across the city right now.

It reminds me the story about BLM protest in NYC. Where a white girl with some social science degree was arrested for putting a building on fire. And in her words she was fighting for the communist revolution to give the power to the workers and poor people, saying how rich people can not understand the struggle of poor workers. It turned out, that she never had a job, instead she lived in a luxurious apartment worth millions and driving mercedes, which all - including all her expenses - were funded by her rich parents, and she honestly considered herself a "poor worker" because with her education she struggled to find the job worth the money she believed she deserved. So in her own statement she believed that she is essentially homeless victim of the system as the property she was using technically belonged to her parents and she doesnt have her dream job yet, and therefore she is dependent on her parents - those capitalist pigs! How crazy is that? The detachment from reality.

The poors are lowering my property value.

@@xlukas93 Yeaaah. But on the other hand, "trust fund babies" who claim they are hard working or smart. But never actually got any degree in anything, is extremely common on the republican side. And the whole "detachment from reality". If you look into the people who got caught into Janurary 6th, it is people who the republicans are trashing daily. From stay at home dads, immigrants, low income etc. I genuinely do not believe a thing in this world is balanced. But the whole people whom are "detachement from reality" is probably the actual only "both sides" thing that there is at the moment.

@@zengara11 i agree the detached people are on both sides. Obviously. There are still people like q anon etc... which is proper crazy. But I guess not that far from communists either

@@xlukas93 as Tom MacDonald would say we don’t have a left or right issue we have a mental illness issue .

Not a problem in the least. Group Think is the problem. Collectivism is the problem. The USA is great because we are the lone example of when people decided for the Individual over the Mob. End of the day what all of this "justice" nonsense is nothing more than a Corporate Monopoly wanting more market share. More dumb consumers buying even more worthless trinkets.

Respect for individuality is why I wasn't locked in my home for the convid scamdemic.

​@@DUCKSAREEVILLLLLLLLselfish, check.

@@saliferousstudios MSM zombie. Check.

@@DUCKSAREEVILLLLLLLL The media doesn't spread viral pathogens, infected people do. Don't conflate your own inability to have empathy and compassion for others with individuality. Just say you don't care.

Its a good story. I am glad they ran it because its an under addressed issue. But its also really misleading. It misses that its Republicans allied with small coalitions of Democrats blocking the rest of Democrats from making reforms. I mean yes we should call out hypocritical Democrats. But its important to realize that greater numbers of Republicans support these policies than Democrats do.

@@peterisawesomeplease How does this mean the video is misleading? The base hypothesis is how democrats can and actively do block progress without the help of Republicans. The whole point of making it seems to be to call to light problems that progressives generally don't notice or refuse to acknowledge simply because they're too focused on how the Republicans are bad. It makes no sense to bring up the mechanics of how the Republicans block reforms in a video about how the Democrats block reforms. In fact, it completely obfuscates the point. Let's say I was a young student and my homework was to write an essay about how dangerous Tigers are and how to avoid an attack. Do you think it would earn me marks to get to the third paragraph and be like: "Now, as you can see, Tigers are very dangerous. But, it turns out the Canadian Moose are even more dangerous!" And spend time talking about that instead? No. It has no bearing on what makes tigers dangerous or how to deal with them. In fact, I would hope that the tiger essay has no obfuscating points about how to protects yourself from Moose, because you may learn that it's safe to climb a tree to escape a tiger only to watch it claw its way up to you no problem. In fact, there's all sorts of dangerous things left unmentioned in this hypothetical essay, that doesn't mean they're not dangerous. Sorry, I just find this to be such a vapid, useless form of dissent and I see it everywhere. "They didn't mention a point that I think is important, so they could've done better!" But the reality is that making such a point actually makes the video worse.

@iTips source? Have you seen New York State in the last 10 years? ""We're your source?" That's like saying "Where's the sun?"

@@LordLoveaDuck If it's that obvious I'd think you'd have absolutely no problem whatsoever producing one single source... but... you... didn't...

@@peterisawesomeplease exactly!

and by poor, they mean minorities.

This is 100% correct

Wrong title. It's limousine liberals, champagne socialists and gulfstream environmentalists.

@@stachowi Oh, I think that includes all the poor, regardless of race. Can you really imagine poor whites being welcome there? The really poor some call "white trash"? No way would they want those people either.

So you would rather the rich people not be pushing for policies that would be helping the poor? I'm not really sure how people are trying to draw such a distinct hypocrisy because poor areas are typically higher rates of crime, correct?

Yep same with USA illegal immigration. It took the border states sharing the load by filling busses and aircraft with people illegally crossing the southern border to the states who said it wasn't a problem, for them to finally admit it's actually a problem.

They just forgot to add the other side of the coin where the GOP is aright and all the propaganda they have been pumping into the pro-Dem and anti-Rep debate has lead to this.

Actually, I think someone was asleep at the editing desk and allowed this to slip by because John had professional capital. I doubt they’ll let it happen again.

NYT is a lot more centrist than they get credit for

@@ab3040 Not according to the extensive research conducted by Mark Levin. But I think they lean a little more left of center than they were about 20 years ago.

What do you expect from millionaires who preach about open borders, gun control, and climate change while taking private jets to work from their gated communities surrounded by armed guards. It's time to wake up and see who the real bourgeoisie are in America.

George Carlin coined it as “NIMBY” “Not In My Backyard”

“Immigrants and refugees have rights! Not accepting them is akin to murder!” *”Just don’t send them to my neighborhood.”

Bingo..

@@benjamin8459 lol. Funniest is when they preach open borders while living in gated communities.

Me too. When I saw the NYT logo, I went "whoa"! I have boycotted them bc of their biased coverage of issues, so while I enjoyed this its not representative of their usual drivel.

It’s biase💀

Politics became less polarized in the last months, I ask myself why

@@contrariobastian4046 not an election year

@@Shanecohen true but the NYT would not do this neither 2-3 years ago, they where focused in the media war against the Republican Party or am I wrong?

see the issue is people are selective.

@@contrariobastian4046 i mean that comment isnt wrong i totally agree, but i was replying to why the media is less polarizing the past couple months. it gets SUPER polarized during elections. also nowadays the average american knows the media is complete BS. they have to build their reputation back up maybe?

@@benklingman Liberals are only Left-Wing if you don´t have a Left.

Thinking the Democrats are left is the problem

I hope u didn't need this video to realize that

@Kosch GM what do you mean? The right does the same thing

Then why do you keep voting for what's wrong, what doesn't work, what you don't want to go along with? Why do you move to conservative states and cities, and then pressure those people to vote Democrat? Why do you call people racist who are just thinking like you, if you're honest, are?

Ugly a solution as it is, I would look to Houston. They just don't have much zoning there and building permits fly out the door. You might end up living next to an auto junkyard, but their rent's at the lowest of any major metropolitan or were the last I checked. Couple years ago it was about 700 for a one bedroom. That's worth some junkyards.

So I've made three posts here: one about how Britain's lost to the neo feudalists, one about how caning is the only legitimate solution to the social order issues (it's the only deterrent that works but doesn't require massive incarceration,) and one suggesting Houston zoning for most cities. *The truly crazy thing is I'm right on all three.* We have immense problems, crazy problems, so the solutions may have to be crazy as well.

Ah, but it isn't the politicians in this case, it's the people

we live in a period

nice pfp tho

From the video, it was made abundantly clear that the real problem lies with the voters who elect the politicians. But it's always easier to blame someone else, isn't it? I'm a Democrat, and although opposed to the idea of "not in my backyard" and the hypocrisy present in that mindset, I recognize that blame can't be placed solely on Republicans, that Democratic voters need to take responsibility for the laws and policies enacted, especially on the local, county, and state level where they enjoy heavy majorities. I'm glad that this video exposes Democratic hypocrisy, I welcome the criticism, find it valid, but I think this video, despite a few sparse caveats, critically omits the inequalities in Republican majority states, towns, and districts. If a person is lower middle-income or poor, especially if a minority, it is my experience they generally fare far better where Democrats are in power than Republicans. This video also omits other forms of inequality and how Republicans at the national level and overall are the prime drivers of inequality. Most critically, it ignores how the GOP has abdicated its duty and responsibility to act as LOYAL opposition, instead descending into a fascist, nihilistic hyper-partisan cult. By failing to take into account the big picture, this opinion video fails to see the forest for the trees, which does the public a disservice. “Let us never forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President and senators and congressmen and government officials, but the voters of this country.” - Franklin D. Roosevelt “Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin D. Roosevelt

@@wilywascal2024 >Gets criticized >Immediately throws "whatabout" argument lol

Commentary based on facts is indeed an opinion, but this is the most factual commentary addressing democratic hypocrisy I've seen in a while. I think this is a healthy self call out. You're always nicer to the ones that you care for. Never the less both parties have been trash for quite a while.

Because they have to back up their opinions with facts, but news goes over with no research for the fact of speed, thus fake or misleading news.

It's almost like the NYT is, still, America's premier journalism.

@@stongnyid I wouldn't go that far.

Except they left out all the progressive changes in Virginia that occurred after the Democrats gained full control of the state legislature in 2018. That would have been a better comparison of the stark difference between GOP "leadership" and actual Democratic governance.

@@icemachine79 I agree hopefully he will have a story where some good progressive programs have been implemented. But bottom line in California and New York liberal hyprocisy is horrifyingly damaging to low income minorities. To the point that the KKK just looks at the pounding racism of massive prison populations and horrible schools and thinks "how can they get away with that?'"

Excellent point. Pretty much characterizes a majority of our society.

Point is more or less the same though, that we are a nation of hypocrites.

@@jameslebron2403 Well, the Blue half maybe. The reds are just open about their views on the hard decisions. Except when they contradict themselves...oh wait hang on a tick...

This gentleman is spitting

@@marcusyoung2870 The best down to earth people I met don’t come from rich families

Virtue signaling is the backbone of the Democratic Party

You've read your Machiavelli! :)

@@korhashamo Republicans aren't perfect on that front either.

@@reizayin Republicans are evil too but they're usually direct about it. Both of these corporate-sponsored parties are garbage. After 20 years of being a reliable blue vote, I'm done with both major parties. It's third party or bust for me.

​@@korhashamo What he said at 0:51 pretty much nails it. The problem is that it isn't a fault of the two party system, here in Brazil we have multiple parties, but it always boils down to "us vs them", and it didn't take me long to realize that with a mindset like that, we won't really evolve much further as a species.

Better make it 10 miles...wouldnt want to hurt "property values"

The democrat party created the projects as part of their great society

Ahhh, the NIMBY's... "Not in my backyard"

HasanAbi has been crying hypocrisy on both sides for months.

How about 500 mile distance? Not in the state or country they live in.

The NIMBY plague

Hey! from France. Good luck with your strikes and take care of each other to be able to hold longer, you gonna need it even more as they just gutted the "reconciliation" bill to rebuild the USA. But if you want to be noticed you can do a "casserolade", it's an old french "recipe" to make some noise. I don't talk about cuisine, I talk about an old way to protest in the street to make noise and/or music with a pan or a saucepan and spoons made of wood. It's quite festive. ;-) Hi from France and here is a smarter way to pray... just kidding, to think: Don't ask yourself if you have good reasons to think what you think (confirmation bias) but rather ask yourself if you have bad reasons to believe what you are so confortable to think. In a nutshell, the way of the lawyers versus the way of the good scientists. ;-)

Bad takes like this is why there's an issue in the first place. Having low income families living in your neighbourhood is not a "burden".

Exactly. They take no action.

@@america1754 Not all "NIMBY's" are the same. I don't agree with continually building high-end, luxury housing, when there is clearly a much greater need for low-income, and very low-income housing. Most folks incomes don't fall into the upper class, or upper middle class bracket. Greed and overt political corruption are ruling society now.

will you still remain a progressive leftist? Knowing your supporting the exact opposite of the parties headlines, preachings?

@@DavySTUN You're looking at the beginnings of a red pill moment.

@@DavySTUN A leftist is very different from a democrat. Democrats are very mild conservatives lmao

@@DavySTUN Being a leftist does not equal being a big D Democrat.

@@TheKazzerscout "Being a leftist doesn't mean being a big D Democrat." I'm sorry, I understand you may feel like you need to distance yourself from this. I'd like to point out some things (and I want you to understand I'm not coming after you, your beliefs, your political opinions or the merit of either.) This piece is underling something important that you may need to listen to. Areas that are primarily liberal leaning (or claim to be) don't hold up to those tenants of liberalism when it comes to their door. They want to claim these ideas, but never put the work in. Big D Democrats (not all but some) claim these ideas. Why? Also, and this is just an aside for me, it's telling that "opinion" had to be plastered all over this video.

I know. Before I clicked on the video, I had to windshield wiper my eyes... NYT? What?

I’m only half surprised NYT did a piece like this. But I would be outright stupefied if Fox News did something like this.

@@fartnutssupreme4930 Yup, that organization does look to be more stubborn to accept their errors than NYT.

Personally I believe a healthy democracy requires healthy opposition. Theres no pressure for deep blue or deep red states to adress much year on year. The issue now is that I see so many of our old institutions like media, education and business just argue in complete bad faith to each other.

@@fartnutssupreme4930 Fox News would never do a piece like this, and the reason why is because this piece is critiquing the Democratic Party *from the Left* This piece isn’t attacking the Democratic Party’s stated Left-wing values and goals; it’s criticizing it for not living up to those values when/where it has the power to do so Fox News’ entire raison d’être is attacking the Democratic Party, of course, but it will only attack it from the Right- By attacking the Left’s very goals/values themselves from a Right-wing perspective It’s never going to criticize the Democratic Party for not being progressive enough- Only for not being conservative enough

Thats why I self identify as a centrist.

People expect too much from the state. Voting for active policy is a fool's errand, full of predictable "unintended" consequences if not deliberate malfeasance. Centrism/pragmatism are synonyms for doing whatever sounds good with no principles.

Which mostly in public media and education has been taken over by hard lefties.If you are more centre or have some conservative values you are already booed,called sexit and you have not right to take challenge other side.

Exactly both sides do it but it about who does the most and has the most effect on the public

I mean, are we just ignoring the Democrats sponsoring riots for a year?

America in a nutshell........ And it's funny because John Oliver made a point, to point this out two days ago on Sunday when addressing the Power grid problem this country is facing......

What those homeowners don’t realize is that residential real estate sale appraisals are based on “sales of comparable real estate”. So their property values are not exactly affected by that affordable senior citizen apartment building. The appraisal of the properties that are adjacent to the apartments could be affected by the building, but the other houses in that neighborhood will have their appraisals adjusted if being compared with one of the adjacent houses.

Lol

Here in europe we have in average 10 parties, all them totally different. In USA you only have 2 far right wing parties choices to vote.

The analysis is false. The situation is really a tragedy of the commons: the Commons in this case being a real estate market. The winners are the developers; The losers are the owners of single-family dwellings who can’t afford the taxes that go up as developers imagine the opportunity to build multi family and dancer housing structures. The truth is that much of the homeless problem is an issue of mental illness and addiction. The rest of the homeless problem is in evitable as everyone wants to move to the same beautiful areas of the world. Do we really need to tear down the beautiful park like neighborhoods that everyone wants to live in just that that they can be turned into ghetto-like apartment buildings? I guarantee that if this happens the wealthier people will simply move out and the New tax base won’t be able to support the cities and their former glory

du du du dump du du dump.... the liberal family started..... protected from the harshness ..... .entitled and self-righteous ....... the Liberal family! ....du du du dump du du du dump

i know in paterson and jersey city, they spend 20-30k per student. wtf is this reporter reporting on?? the rich pay for this!!? the good schools spend much less per student. between 5-7k per student.

@ECOM.SCIENCE Still doesn't get around the fact that the rich pay the vast majority of the taxes. The progressive agenda is simply economic illiteracy, compounding by self undermining contradiction such as open borders, mass importation of dependents while complaining about housing wages and taxes.

I'm in favor of medium density housing. Just not in my backyard.

Well, tbf, their critique is that "Democrats arent being left wing enough"

Between this, and Weinstein, this is the NYT's best work in recent history.

@@richardharrow3697 This "opinion" piece cited and sourced more facts than a Bob Woodward exposé.

Criticize both sides? He barely touched on the red states. And there was nothing unbiased about this.

@@ChrisZahrte This dude is definitely a liberal. He didn't need to touch on any conservative points in this video because it isn't about them, every one of these points is something that conservatives already oppose. This is meant to be a wake up call for the liberals

@@Dr4gon2000 I agree. I am absolutely fine with other liberals and progressives calling out our politicians, especially with this kind of research. Republicans definitely don't have a leg to stand on, but this is absolutely needed!

Nyt is liberal? Lol. Not everything to the left of fox is liberal.

@@djdedan Yes nyt is liberal not a leftist channel

This is about the rich in truth. Not so much 'liberals'. But you just stick to your silly 'beliefs'.

Never believed Liberal NYT would release something like this. But also probably why I didn't know about it until after 2 months.

It's an OpEd

Amen to that. This piece has given me a lot of hope.

CNN should most definitely be held accountable though.

@@HenryBenedictUSA I've heard CNN is losing it's audience. And that's a good thing. They became too far left that they forgot they must balance things and must heard the right side without bias and ambiguous wordings.

As a conservative non-Trumper, I completely agree. The two party system has failed us all. This has spilled over into the media as all have noted. Our leaders on both sides are selfish narcissists, so far out of touch with the 80% in the middle that they can’t understand what the country needs. I don’t see our government changing, so we just get whiplashed every time there is a party change in power. There are no winners in this scenario. We all need to demand more from the politicians. I wish we could call them leaders but they don’t deserve that level of respect.

True. But they do it for different reasons. So I very much doubt it's a coming together of policies, at least.

My thoughts exactly. I might actually get a subscription if they stuck to evidence based policy analysis instead of moderate golden mean nonsense.

"The guts" you explained the problem right there 🤣

So why would you still consider yourself a Democrat if you've seen that the people you support, who wield the power, don't do anything regarding the things you dislike?

they've shifted to communism, don't cheer your own genocide.

Dems, Republicans - they are all the same - look at the dems current efforts to repeal the SALT tax deduction - 100% of the benefit will go to the wealthy. It's all politics.

im black and i live here and I can tell you its just as hypocritical as any red state or any blue state lol. humans are flawed to our core unfortunately

Isn't it great though. We'd have a lot more responsive government if they didn't think their control was guaranteed.

It's that blind loyalty that produces extremism

I mean this is old news for Democrats. For the last 30 years the Democrats have been a big tent party. We embrace a huge range of people with very different ideas of how to govern compared to Republicans that act as more of a monolith. Most democrats are unhappy with their party and have been that way for a long time. As much a Republicans scream RHINO they much more reliably support their own party at the grass roots level. At high levels its different. There is much more cooperation between high level Democrats than between high level Republicans. But I think most Democrats will just shrug at this and go yea pretty much. Especially the the furthest left Democrats that have been bad about this for decades.

Most republicans argue in their nice houses, it's not blind if you have nice things & live a good life

Agree...Unconditional loyalty to a politician or political party is an unconditional surrender of moral fortitude and erodes the strength of character that defines integrity

They are effectively the same party. Romney? Biden? What is the difference?

I don't trust NY Times.

Johnny Harris is great. NYT? Not so much.

@@FAITHandLOGIC hear hear

@@wandasewell4501Same, I believe they are switching there tone now because of the gigantic losses dems are facing across the country. Either way good video

The only way NYT would ever publish something like this is if it were coming from libs like the ones who made this video. Guarantee they wouldn’t publish an opinion piece that makes very similar points from the right. The right has been saying similar things for years, btw. I wish they’d have covered the homelessness, as well. They raise tons and tons of money for the homeless, but it’s just never even used for the homeless. Sure wish I knew what they really used that money for. 😑

Yep. I saw something about homelessness, and it changed my view on it. I have come to the conclusion that I would much rather look out my window and see a homeless shelter, or some type of assistance or charity, than look out my window, and see a homeless camp.

underrated comment. it's actually the root of many of our problems today

I'm not a bleeding heart. But I have helped numerous friends with a roof when they needed. I would not help a felon . Who would get away with it tho.. in case you don't know .. illegal immigration is a felony...

@@tobiasreaper3650 Go check out the piece on homelessness in Salt Lake City UT; or lack thereof. They actually went through the effort to do a Cost Benefit Analysis and found putting homeless in apartments was cheaper than letting them be on the streets/shelters. AND here's the best part, once the homeless got stable housing, they were able to get Jobs and become productive members of society instead of a drain. Seattle, Denver, LA; homelessness is rampant despite being "Progressive Liberal Cities".

It is FREE to reach down and pick up a piece of trash on the sidewalk or side of the road. I live in a nice neighborhood, but still, people throw trash out of their car window as they drive by. So my family picks up any trash that lands on our yard. I did the same WHEN I WAS RENTING. If people don’t want to live surrounded by trash, why not start by picking it up? Why expect someone else to do it? Have some pride in where you live, whether you own it or not. Poverty is largely a mindset. I know, because my family started out with nothing and rose above.

Yeah, Johnny Harris is great.

They do plenty of serious reporting. People just don't pay attention to it.

@Welcome to Clown World! The profit motive and insular nature of political elites as upper class people and those working around them also being upper class people explains most of everything.

no but he was one of them few years ago was pushing mass illegal immigration intom the west , this guy is a hypocrite him self, was pushing misinformation 4 yerars the irony

All you did was look at the title. Half the housing problem in California (which was half his thesis) is because people want to live in state with such a good economy and the housing system can't keep up with demand.

This is an ironic claim because the original quote is "white moderate", not white liberal. And it's probably convenient for you to misremember it as such, because the moderates are less NIMBy than the people on the "real left" who are more likely to oppose a affordable housing construction. People hailed as some sort of working class heroes by the political outsider crowd (think Bernie and friends) have opposed construction of affordable homes over made up "gentrification" fears, or complaining about "neighborhood character" like (robert reich did). This extends all the way to pop culture figures who like to posture themselves as anti mainstream (recently Dave Chappelle who specifically opposed just the affordable part of a construction project near his home). Or take the case of a columbia professor who likened an affordable housing contruction to colonialism because, get this, it was gonna built in place of a private dog park. Now-a-days its the moderate who can be trusted to support the pragmatic solution, hear and now.. rather than make infinite purity tests and fault every solution like the "real left'.

@@psd993 no they said white liberals one google search will prove you wrong 💀 lemme guess ur a white “liberal” like the people in this vid describe???

You're correct, but i hope you understand that these criticisms are coming from a leftists perspective, not a conservative one.

I wish I have heard every word Malcolm X had said when I first immigrated in this country.

It's a front. Compassion in these people are just a false emotion to the onlookers in order to be seen as good.

You dropped this 👑

Yessir

As a conservative myself I LOVE America! I am fine with lots of my fellow citizens being homeless - I don't know any of them. And it's fine for some people to be unable to afford basic needs. And I'm also fine with people dying of preventable diseases because they can't afford to participate in the healthcare industry. I'm also fine with oil companies lying about the causes of climate change as long as their goal is to maximize profits. And I'm totally fine with insurance companies denying claims from customers in order to maximize profits. And I'm fine with industry polluting the land as long as profits are high, and stock values are growing. In fact, I might just stop voting since the status quo is just perfect for me. It was great in the 80s, got better in the 90s, I survived the 2008 crash just fine, and now in 2021, everything is more perfect than ever! It's always a wonderful time to be a conservative!

@@robthomas5827 try again, maybe bring a tiki torch with you next time. 🤣🇵🇭

I would be interested in that too!

some people are more equal than others.

more like: "...but not if it will cost me money"

Nimbys

This attitude is pretty endemic at the moment and I honestly can't understand how people live with the cognitive dissonance all the time.

@@orlandogastonchandleraziz9855 Carlin🙂

@G G I'm not sure about where Johnny Harris stands politically. He seems like a "radical centrist" who is more interested in good old fashioned investigative journalism targeting the powerful. He left the Mormon Church as a young adult, so he's clearly a very critical, questioning person who's less interested in dogma and more in finding truth. The critique in this video, however, is very similar to the kind that progressives make against hypocritical wealthy liberals (I say as a progressive who likes to criticize hypocritical wealthy liberals). The only issue I take with it, however, is how there is no delineation between progressive/activist/leftist circles, who have been calling out blue state hypocrisy for years, and the liberals that this video rightly calls out. Like the right, the left is not a monolith, perhaps even moreso if the perennial meme about "leftist infighting" is anything to go off of.

@@vitaminluke5597 good analysis, and I agree with you

@@vitaminluke5597 shocked to find a good take in KZfaq comments

Palo alto is not a very liberal place at all. To center half your video about that one case and then gloss over the fact that they banned single family zoning as a minor ‘step forward’ is a joke.

@@xiaoka woah woah. I just got to that part in the video, I need to look this up because that's huge

They can't. They're the NYT. Reality MUST take a back seat to the narrative.

almost like there are other political leanings than just conservative and liberal

@@rick4580 You're right about one thing, Conservatives do not specifically want to use government to arrange for affordable housing and quality education. You Democrats have fooled yourself into thinking that your compassion without results is better than the Republicans' focus on good-economy-equals-good-everything (including but not limited to housing and education). The USA has better education than Angola not because of Democrats in the USA, but because of a great economy which was been championed and grown by the philosophy of the Right. In every single major political issue, Democrats oppose economic strength. Environment. Taxes. Spending. Entitlements. Lockdowns. Mandates. Everything always against the economy. Yet when there's not enough money to carry things out, they cry for more anti-economic, Leftist ideas. Because "displayed compassion" is better than actually helping people.

@@rick4580 Dude. Angola's stolen wealth by its corrupt leaders is not enough money to do any public service. Democrats stand in the way of all the reason the USA is a first world country. We're all lucky the current woke Democrat philosophy was not in power 200 years ago.

@@rick4580 Ole George wouldn't have fired somebody for saying there are two genders.

Agreed

1 insightful piece out of hundreds isn't very balanced. I'll pass

You only like it when it calls out our side. You don't like it when it calls out yours. I get it.

How would you know if they put out good piece you don't even read them.

This is ultimately self-serving.

He's still wrong about most of what he's saying. Like complaining about some areas having less education money. He doesn't tell you that throwing money at inner city kids doesn't do anything to benefit them at all.

I think this boils down to a rich ppl problem than a liberal/conservative issue

@@justinlane1768 Then why are all these problems specifically occurring in liberal states, as the video clearly showed?

@@viljamtheninja Maybe I didn't watch the video close enough, but I'd bet money that these same issues occur in less liberal areas. Reality is that most high income areas tend to be liberal. I'm sure if you found some red states with similar high income neighborhoods, you'd see the exact same things represented here.

@@justinlane1768 The high income areas are only liberal in liberal states. Do you think conservative states don’t have high income areas? Because the high income areas around where I’m from is mostly conservative.

@@jessicakimbrell4124 and do these types of issues persist in your area?

Because they're good journalists. Maybe stop calling them the enemy of the people?

@@EnsignLeeDS9 no, they’re still the enemy of the people.

I’m guessing NYT is a traditionally left media

Yeah. I have an elder professor, who I had as a professor. He was a journalist and did a class that gets people from a lotta majors in. He said that people think news organizations are vultures, but they're actually quite timid. Anything that rocks the boat, and could harm their bottom line, management won't let through. It's very frustrating because the average journalist got into it to help people and explore to find and show truths of this world, but organizations, like the NYT, care about their power more often, not following what their journalists could do. He seemed a bit disillusioned by the modern state of journalism, but still believes things can change.

@@maximusthemerciful9452 well that is fox, full of lies and racism and soft white nationalism