Thank you for the kind words and thanks for watching! They sound like a great group :)

Thanks :) Happy to help, Evan!

I am so pleased!! Absolutely surreal. Your art is incredible, Kyle! But you already know that ✨

Thank you so much, Florjan! I'm glad you like it!

Thank you so much for watching! I'm glad you're enjoying them 🥰

The dream!! So exciting, hope you have a great time! ✨

Thank you! So glad you liked it :)

Not at the moment but they're currently working on one apparently! Exciting! :) thanks for watching

Thank you so much, Thomas! I'd love to review more Leder Games, they're doing great things :) Keep an eye out!

@@EmilyandThings Haha, I'll definitely keep the notifications on! :)

Oh yes! A review for Vast: The Mysterious Manor please!

Wait, where can I find the Fort review? Doesn't seem to be on this channel?

@@MaxAlias It seems to have been removed together with some other, older reviews. As much as I can remember, she gave the base game an 8 or 9 and with the expansion a 9 or 10 (out of 10).

Thanks, Leon ✨ I hope it was worth it!

Yeah, I can completely understand that. The expansion sounds like it will do a little more to make all players invested, which would be neat to see. It's definitely a tough game to break into for many reasons. Thanks for watching 😊

Yes! Sorry, I made a lot of videos private when joining SUSD. Some because they were before my transition, some because they were no longer accurate. I'll be making more, though!

I have played it a few times at 2 players since the review and I really did not enjoy it very much. I think it's 3 minimum for me :/ There's a good text review by Adrian Pop on Board Game Geek that covers the game at 2 players. Might be worth checking out 😊 boardgamegeek.com/thread/2893083/our-boardgame-story-oath-mostly-2-player-review

@@EmilyandThings Thank you for getting back to me so quickly! Yeah I assumed that was the case, and sadly I don't have a consistent group to play with, which I feel like you should have for Oath. Anyway, thank you, and great video btw! You made a huge complicated game understandable and funny to follow in such a short video! Keep up the good work

@@augustlewen2149 you thought that was quick 😛 no problem! Yeah, you definitely benefit a lot from a consistent group. Very hard to come by, I feel your pain. Thank you so much 😊 glad you enjoyed it!

It's just one of the many options. If you think you are in a bad place, you might want to join the larger power and try to win from there. Or set yourself to be in a better position for the next game, where you can then become the successor or make a move to become an exile again and have made lots of progress. I've never done it successfully myself haha but it's an option!

@@EmilyandThings Yes, i get that. But, for example, if u are a Chancellor, and one rebel player is doing really bad, why would u offer him citizenship, and get him back right into the game with chance to be successor. What benefit does Chancellor have for offering something like that. So, if u are winning as rebel, u dont need to be citizen, if u are losing as rebel, chancellor doesnt want to risk with bringing rebel back into game. Little bit weird. By the way, great videos, keep up the good work

@@worlddd7777 I guess it's up to the Chancellor to decide if it's worth it. There are definite benefits like the citizen's warbands are then turned into the chancellor's instead, and the citizens can't do anything to harm the Chancellor. So, if the Chancellor will get those benefits, while also feeling confident that they can keep the citizens under their control, it may be worth it :) thank you very much for watching!

@@worlddd7777 in my opinion, citizenship is something the game attaches so few incentives and punishments to that its use will be entirely dictated by the play style preferences of the group playing, and it's something that everyone has to figure out their own relationship to. I make the most offers of citizenship out of anyone in my playgroup (30+ games) and I'll explain why. It's extremely difficult to build an advantage that lasts multiple chronicle phases. When players can't stop you from winning, they'll frequently try to weaken your position for next game. If you make an offer of citizenship to another player you and that player are still competing, but at least they're interested in building strength that you share. I also frequently bake-in constraints to the deal that reduce the avenues of conflict I have to worry about, such as a mutual promise that we won't campaign against each other. This makes the position of chancellor slightly less stressful and improves the odds of building an empire that might actually last. Tl;Dr: the grand scepter is the most powerful relic in the game because it's the only one that can make friends for you.

@@worlddd7777 If the chancellor is losing, he can better his/her odds. One less exile to get attacked by and 1 more citizen to keep the remaining exiles in check. Is there a risk that the fresh citizen might become the successor - sure. Everything has risks - you just pick the risk that is best for you.