It's all about getting out of jail. Jeopardize he can care less about!

​@@micah9096 Are you an ex con? Seeing as how you know so much.

@@earthmagic1 go ahead explain your point since you don't know so much? 🤔🤔

Not if they tell everyone they made it up to get out jail for a day or two to go to court and maybe get a meal out.

​@Micah Exactly, Dude looken to shed time off

Literally. This is exactly what I expect when I think about a Midwest court proceeding. Lmao

This!!!!! Lmao

​@@justinaustin3063 I always thought of this as a harmless cheese eating state. Almost afraid to go to a small town there. 😅🧀😶‍🌫️

This whole trial is lmfao

I think since he was seen to be so great with Rittenhouse it's a bit cloudy as to how good or a judge he actually can be but he doesn't seem to be all bad judges have their good and bad moments

He was great in the Rittenhouse trial

I think he’s great.

He's old skool and he cares abd respects the law & rights I mean he went nuts at Kyle rittenhouse prosecuter for trying to use his silence without a lawyer against him and judge went nuts not because he's on KR side but cause he believes the rights laws in this great country as he says.

I think it should be allowed in, but I also think this should be the exception for lie detectors to verify information.

Definitely

@@roxiewatters1161 agreed. a lot of inmates, unfortunately, are not that smart & cannot ACTUALLY convince themselves this happened to really believe it & fake the test.

Couldn’t agree more. This should not be credible testimony

I think it honestly depends on the case. One of the Mark Jensen informants was extremely credible. Since it was a retrial after something like a decade, he had also turned his life around and ran his own business and was going to school. This witness isn't great. But their credibility is decided by the jury, and the defense could do an easy job of ripping him to shreds if the story is implausible.

I was just scrolling through the comments if anyone else noticed that!!! Definitely rehearsed!!!

This man is lying through his teeth. If this man is talking in his sleep about a homicide in the county jail more than one person would hear it when you are in the county jail you are in a pod with multiple people and they are two people to each bunk.

Noticed that!!!

@Ken Ginger good catch!!! Today they decided to view exactly that in court!

They do rehearse their testimony every witness up there has been questioned before today. The defense does the same with their witnesses

Exactly the da promised him if he got on the stand and lied he would get his time cut

@Shauna: And how do you know his plea deal??? I dont believe you do...

Just because someone is in jail does not mean they cannot give honest testimony.

@@lastjob2011 But that's pretty seldom the case...

Like he’s going to tell him to look him in his eyes 😂

Lmao 😂 me too

Phrase

Leniency from a mandatory minimum - maybe... it hasn't been signed yet. And this guy stated he is not going to agree with multiple accusations made in this plea agreement - so hopefully this guy gets no plea deal and he implicated himself under oathe.

They scripted the whole direct..... You can see the DA mouthing "die die die" when he is testifying

No it’s just this prosecutor SUCKS he didn’t even want the trial to go forward HE asked for a mistrial

Exactly

@@hippygirlfriend4937 I didn't real8ze prosecution was the one ask8ng got mistrial

I knew he looked familiar

Kyle rotten house will rot in his new house (that is prison) :)

Should be a mistrial just for that lol

@@ajwof26 - yeah, that's crazy. He was clearly coached in open court, then camera panned away. Hard telling what inmate has been told (i.e. incentivized) to say. Homie gonna be eating good and probably even able to sneak a couple smokes. F'd up, really.

Some people do that when they’ve been trained to read lips. It’s mostly the hearing impaired that do that, so they can figure out what you’re saying.

OMG I looked back at it and died laughing! I think they are going over a script and must have read both parts. I used to compete in speech and debate and sometimes I would see a monolouge or duet so many times that I started saying the words.

It was not coached but ANTICIPATED.

Yea this isn’t right at all it shouldn’t even be allowed!!! No way!! This guy is in it for a reduced sentence he could be saying anything!! You can’t trust him!

This judge is over the hill

This is actually an excellent judge. Did you watch the Rittenhouse case? A truly excellent judge. There is no legal precedence to declare a witness inadmissible unless either side presents evidence. It becomes a juried decision as to credibility. I’d argue hearsay and hope for it to be sustained. The defense didn’t object .

Agree 100% unless that attorney has an ailment.

I agree! However, that tactic CAN be used to create distance and probe the witness.

I was wondering why the attorney is sitting and not standing. Maybe he is not able to be on his feet at that time.

None of the attorneys are standing to question witnesses unless they have to approach. I think one of them may have a disability so the judge is trying to keep it consistent.

They don't have to stand up.

He should have retired after Kyle Rittenhouse trial

@@jennyamato498 he’s a good judge what you talking bout

@@jennyamato498 he should have retired before rittenhouse case

He's holding that position until 2026 actually

Hes a good judge from what I've seen.

Rosalio Gutierrez was cheating on her…

I THOUGHT SO!!

Yep 😒

Thank you. I’ve been trying to figure out what previous big case he presided over for the last seven minutes!

This guy is going to walk free, the judge will be sure of it!!

@@carolinagallegos3926ome of y’all really do not understand how trials work. Do a little research.. it’s not hard to do. Or matter of fact, go back and watch the entire Rittenhouse trial like I did. The guy was proven to be defending himself and the jury gave him a “Not guilty” verdict for a reason. The evidence was clear. The fact that people still believe what the media tells them and take it as 100% truth these days is baffling to me. Instead of just assuming you’re not being lied to, maybe take the time to do you’re own legitimate research.

True can't trust them...

Unless they come forward with information that only the killer and LE would know, I take informants testimonies with a grain of salt.

@@christinakaur8766 never know if they were fed the info though. I just personally don’t trust it.

It wouldn’t be fair to say that ALL jailhouse informants are not credible. I believe that, many, of them are. You have to be careful on what you believe and what you don’t. Sure, it’s dicey, but it can be useful. Sometimes! Peace.

@@darincampbell171 I’m sure some are truthful but I will never trust them. If they need a jailhouse informant they have a weak case. Peace to you as well

Maybe! He really seems checked out, spaced out, disinterest.

Boxers as in the breed of dog? In exchange for soups? I don't get that bit

​@@norqdo He's saying that he washes peoples underwear and takes ramen soup packets for payment (not sure if this is speculation or a prison expression idkk)

@@BronzeBellaBria Ah! Thank you!!!❤️

@@norqdoplease tell me That was a joke.

@@kyleedee4113 yes it was

You feel bad for a man who killed another man in a jealous rage? Strange flex. But OK.

I don't understand this blind loyalty to evil doers, why is it assumedly forgivable to do the evil, but completely unforgivable to tell someone about the evil doer? Don't we teach you, our children to tell the truth? How do our children grow up and change that into some kind of us against them? Law enforcement, the courts, anyone trying to obtain the truth and hold the perpetrator accountable, is the "bad guy" or a snitch..while the perpetrator enjoys a protection he does not deserve. It's as if that thought process helps maintain perpetual children who are at first hiding things from Mom &Dad, then from teachers and employers, finally from law enforcement and jailers. It's sad.

Snitch? You mean tell the truth?

@@billyb7465 this witness is looking to get is time cut. It credible at all.

Nothing gonna happen to this guy bro calm down theirs a group of inmates who don’t even care and just wanna do their time “snitching” doesn’t really matter in jail unless ur an active gang member then u have to something to worry

​@@ryanlipple6854 you don't know about jail politics

Completely!🙄he's ridiculous

My thinking is that his reactions are exactly the same to the others on the stand. Which leaves me to believe this witness is likely telling the truth too.

Yes, noticed that too. Very different expression than his other usual expressions throughout the court hearing.

Sarcastic I see

The POS got life. The circumstantial evidence was enough without this man's testimony.

I guess that is one way to let everyone know how gullible you are

Well, I hope you never find yourself on a jury... That dude is lying through his teeth...

You think so?.. sounds like very bad acting to me

He is facing fed time. He is lying because in fed prison there is no parole. 36 days off a year that’s it. He has made a deal and he will get a shorter sentence. Jail/prison is different then outside.

I guess you all know the truth lol, IT IS OK to speculate!!

He is in solitary trust me. They won’t let him with anyone.

Especially since they got him to admit he tried to narc on one of his gang buddies shooting someone and they proved he was lying about it because he was peeing in the bushes and didn’t see anything. Then suddenly he had information on this case. Dude is just trying to cut decades off his federal sentence.😂

Omg. And when the defense brings up more snitching. He literally told on another case and this defense bought it up on purpose to make boy stfu. The defense even brings up other gang members!

You would think that but it depends on who the Majority and Minority are in a prison or block. It’s only Snitching IF what they are saying is True.... but if they are playing the system it’s not snitching..... your throwing some nobody under the bus to save yo as s some time. Perfectly acceptable

Who cares, a snitch is a snitch. He ultimately had a decision and he made it. To be a snitch. The state doesn't have to do anything, they just need information for their case, he will go back to his pod as the snitch he chose to be along with the thousands of other snitches around him. Most snitches are all housed together, so no one is gonna care what he did when they all did the same thing.

👎

His ex is not attractive at all. Why would he be obsessed with her. He could do better.

@@piedpiper5886 u can do better

@@piedpiper5886 looks aren’t everything… shallow of you to think that

Bahhaha 😂 I was thinking if this was turned into a movie Brad Pitt could play him- it’s the tiny nose and the eyes 😂

Statements against an adverse party's own interest is an exception to hearsay. So anything the defendant said that implicates himself is admissible.

Don’t blame you for not watching it. The judge is a nuisance.

Seems so disrespectful

Broken legs. All of them.

I think one of them may have a disability so the judge is asking all of them to stay seated when questioning. Some of the attorneys have been able to approach the witnesses.

Judges decide sit or stand. Seated takes less Court time.

They use table mics, when they stand they can't be heard easily.

There is a comment made by the judge later on this same day about that, something to do with the appellate court not liking them iirc. It's either an objection/discussion there & then or kick the jury out & they argue in "private".

@@leafyfififoo The appellate court doesn’t like them? Shocker. I just don’t understand why the attorneys don’t just approach the bench. Sidebar. Jury doesn’t have to leave. Arguments had in private. Win/win. Edited to add that after being in chat and reading everyone’s disdain for the way the judge was handling this case, I thought the previous commenter was saying the appellate court didn’t like the judge and his court. My bad! 😂

@@KnittingArtisan Did you read what that person said? The judge doesn't want them to. Discussion had in sidebar does not make the record. The outcome does - the conversation does not. Sometimes, an attorney will request a recap of the conversation be noted for the record outside of the presence of the jury though.

@@teemyoutube2066 After re-reading it, I realize that I misunderstood what they were saying the appellate court didn’t like. I get it now.

You better get some more practice if you think he's telling the truth. Also I'd suggest watching the entire testimony before suggesting someone is telling the truth. It's on cross you see the most tells

Just how his shoulders are indication of anxiety and lying

Everyone is different and do different things when they are lying. First you need to get a person's base line before judging if they are lying or not. If you don't understand what I mean by baseline, it is to see how someone acts when they are not lying and how they act when they are lying. When I received polygraphs the tester at the three letter agency I worked for would ask me my name, age, etc. to get a baseline on my honest replies. Then they would force me to lie by saying something like "I've never driven above the speed limit" to get a baseline on my lying. You can do the same thing without a polygraph machine but you must pay very close attention to the body language to know when a person is lying or not. If you are trying to be sneaky just ask a person non threatening questions you believe that won't lie about to get a baseline on their truthful body language. But bottom line I didn't see a chance anywhere in this video to get this prisoner's baseline. At least not enough to feel confident. Just remember everyone lies different. There's no one size fits all. There is even people that can lie without feeling anything in their conscience so you can't know for sure if they are lying.

What he's looking at is the DA as he mouths what to say

Yeah he's totally honest! 🙄 He's a snitch B----. And everyone hates a snitch. Even cops

Yup. I can’t even watch the whole thing it’s like watching paint dry. And the woman defense attorney is nauseating. This is gonna take 4ever at this rate; see ya at Christmas 🎄

I would not let him judge a dog show

Hilarious I said same thing o gawd not this Judge again lol......do you remember what case we all no him from now that I forgot lol

@@mariaslavinski1588 it was the Kyle Rittenhouse trial

@@durweed yes it was ty just 1 of those things ya no but ya don't remember lol