It is a good engine

As soon as the stock heads come off they're amazing.

That's your Dakota bro?

@@NecromancerGarage the stock untouched heads support 400hp. silence.

Facts

Just to be sure you know its a factory motor

@@mattherritt359 Yea just like a 302 is a factory mustang motor.

It really a is a factory motor though. 1998 Grand Cherokee limited was the only one produced with the 5.9, all other grand Cherokees with v8s had the 5.2, until they came out with the 4.7. Lmao.

Omg the ls hate . im an born raised Gm man own 7 since my 1st 85 z28 camaro at age 15 7 more 3-5 gen camaros an 2 corvettes . besides my love loytaly for Gm i thought like you when i was young an had no since. Ive built my 1st motor in high school after my high school rival had an 87 lx stang with a 351 w c4 trans 8.8 rear vs my poor 305 700r 10 bolt z28 he bet my by 3 cars. My 1st ass whooping i promise myself at age 16 i want get imberres like that again couse the girl liked saw the race to we had no money but was for bragging right at high school. Told my dad an we next week snatch the 305 out found a junk yard 400 small iron sbc 350 trans 12 bolt rear end 650 holly double pump carb on 15 inch mickey ts sportsman pro tires all we had vs a full slick at that time. Well when we raced again we jumped 1 car on me but as soon as 2nd gear hit we beat him 5 cars lenths . mybad for long txt but my point is to bash ls are very foolish i was like you i thought an 2nd gen iron 350 or my lt1 383 car would out performan an ls car only till i had enough money to buy one an did my research ive relize the any based ls motors even an 4.8 stock bottom end 241 heads good cam truck intake would put out more hp . then any past sbc motors we built dont get me wrong thoses old sbc motors are stout but as far as hp per dollor an cube inch . no other motor past or future can give you working man performance like it was rich man hp dyno numbers. Reason way everyone an there grandma eveb a baby can see why they ls swop everything its couse . hp per dollor per 1hp per cubic inch means ls motors are the only motors that produce 1 hp per cubic inch ford dodge no high dollor sky line Supra also motor does that. Do your research an understan why even the die hearted ford man will put a Gm ls in his mustang vs a ford motor ls are proven bad ass hp per dollor mybad bout long txr. Just tried of people bashing or coming for Gm ls motors

@@Meanazhell no sir im actually African American born raised 8 inch lifted chevy truck southern boy. So that would be hen or translation Hennessy cognac. But even when i was in my teens growing up racing on bk roads. I still didn't understand how people be down with Gm. But bash other Gm motors it dont make sense. Like i had an lt1 car we all thought that was fast if you had a 500 hp car you was the man. But now you have stock bottom end 5.3s maling a 1000hp by mastake Then Gm new line of lt motors dry sump newer technology you either progress to what Gm is doing couse its a reason why Gm upgrade spend millions of there own money on new motors an how to make them hold more hp but can be use as a everyday car . In the car an racing world you either get with it or be lefted behing. Or get gapped buy a boat with factory 650-700 hp

Lol that line lock didn’t do anything for him 5.SLOW

Or your new camaro

One is built and stripped out The other one is a stock mustang with some drag slicks

@@mellowd6085 what does the line lock have anything to do with the race? Other than not damaging rear brakes when warming up tires, what advantage is there? it was probably a 5.0 manual, because the 10speed auto does the same time completely stock without racing tires. Whats wrong with 12 second 1/4 mile on a $32k car that includes warranty? The only other car the Mustang can be compared to is the Camaro, these cars are in a league of their own in terms of price for performance in the US.

@@mellowd6085 not that i would personally buy one, but i mean it is faster than the BMW m4 in a straight line, and with the electromagnetic suspension it would actually be capable of driving a lot faster than the BMW M4 regarding daily use. I don't understand why people say a 12s 1/4m is slow on a stock vehicle.

Except for the typhoon

It was i have a zj but inline 6 with a H.O head works nice with the H.O head better than stock

@Game Bred Duramax he meant at the time of this truck was new( 90s)

loved my silver 5.9 GC only made them in 3 colors for that modle

But trailblazer is also newer tech and that doesn’t count not the same era or time. The 1998 5.9 grand Cherokee was fastest until the 2001 grand Cherokee 4.7 HO, then the grand Cherokee SRT8 came out.

It still looks like a sleeper with the bull horns

Or the massive scoop out of the hood lol those things kinda kill it's sleeper status

Not really a surprise for the 5.9. Im Guessing it's the 5.9. And plus any 8c can make 10 easy

I wonder about the other Jeep. It LOOKED stock!! Jeeps are not slow by any means!!

Me too!

Who needs a gen 3 hemi? Small block wedge doing work!

It would be a fun match up. Respecteother way it goes!!

This is before that

That is not remotely an srt8..

98 jeep 5.9 was the world's fastest SUV when it came out. I've had a couple and made more than one Camaro or mustang owner look dumb at stop lights.

Even the 5.2 was a sport cars killer

Similar, mines stock and i got it for $500

lololol dont you love idiots i cant count how many "needs new engine" vehicles ive bought over the years.

Just picked up my 98 5.9 for $700 bucks

They really are! Better than hemis for different reasons...

And the old ones were reliable as well. The Hemi is a different story from what I’ve heard nowadays. I don’t see how Chrysler screwed up so badly with the Jeep Cherokee, damn things used to be reliable. Now what we have are fiat engines in a pile of junk

agreed. need to bring them back instead of the new hemis LOL. bring back the 340 with better head flow, and its game one.

Srock 5.9 magnum head can do 400 hp..

@@jeepsblackpowderandlights4305 but 95% of them cracked.

@@jaymoe5.7 but 95% of them you never know they did. Because it never did anything

@@jeepsblackpowderandlights4305 fair enough, I personally am not a fan of magnum heads because of the cracking and the pedistal mounted rockers vs the shaft mounted rockers on an LA.

yeah not cool. brent was telling their tuner what to do while it was on the dyno at pfi lol

For what? They just filmed them and talked to them. You act like they build this thing for them and tuned it. Would have been nice but it’s not even a dick move since they didn’t actually “work” on his car

🎻 😂😂😂

@@mrmidnight32 I guess using the dyno and ajusting the tune was nothing .also working with the tuner aswell.

@@mrmidnight32 these kids don't get it man hell around here all the young ones will hold the flashlight and swear they rebuild an engine. But honestly OP may just ride pfi's d***.

Yea who needs a gtr

GTRs have gotten kinda....boring. I mean I'm sure an Alpha 10 is an absolute blast to drive. But as far as videos go I feel like I've seen enough GTR content to last three or four lifetimes. We need more R32/33/34 content and less R35 lol

@william dohn its called marking their territory

@william dohn I have owned 7 jeeps since 1977 still have 4 of them none leaks a drop of oil.that includes my 47 willys with the go devil engine. My 2004 grand Cherokee has over 400 thousand miles on it still original motor and drive train and it doesn't leak a drop.

@william dohn I don't care if u believe me or not I have the jeeps here and all maintenance records on them to prove I telling the truth all u got is ur opinion which is totally worthless to me beens u don't have anything to back u up.

@william dohn what a fucking moron u don't know how long the vehicles where parked in the parking lot and what was there before them leaking all over.

@william dohn u probably one of the idiot's that let's jiffy lube or wall mart change his oil.no wonder ur vehicles leak oil everywhere.

9er owners don't put a ls in their jeeps.

There are actually a few ls ones now

Street car or no car.

Right lol

Pretty much they where beasts through and through.

5.9 zj is 4300 not 5000 lbs.. but yes.. a 5.9 stock is faster than any muscle car from the 60-80s stock.. people dont understsnd just how slow the old iron was compared to the modern magnum 5.9

Minus the exhaust lol but so true

can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not lol

Warren Hopkins which one ? Lol.

I wouldn't think it's as fast as it is, for sure.

😄

Tad Manson correct PFI Brett had fun

I was thinking that to

I wanna watch him race a trackhawk on some drag radials, that would be a good race

The srt wouldnt stand up against these maybe the 1000hp trackhawk but no jeep present or past would touch these

The Trackhawks are nasty from a dig. They have a big gear ratio advantage with the 8 speed autos, the engine can spend basically all it's time at peak power.

Ahaha :)

Lmao

Oh for sure! It’s some cool street credit to these!

Rust prevents detonation!.....maybe.

I know what you mean.