I do miss my hangars! o7

that was a thing?? i feel like a young kid hearing his elders talk about how it was in the old days

@@swagman6358ikr😂

@@KuriosChristos I remember that too. Oh, the possibilities! :-D

Every time they increase the scope by adding a new feature I'm more certain it'll never release tbh

@@MrJoeshipley i understand that very well, but i do think all the things that keep being added were planned from the beginning, but now they developed the tech for it to actually possible make it happen, i am carefully exited for it.. but realistically its probably gonna take couple more years

lol they haven't increased the scope, there simply fulfilling their promises without cutting any corners, they've always wanted to implement this. We are so used to triple A games cutting corners well accept anything corner cut and complain. @@MrJoeshipley

I hope you're right

@@jackoghostIt really seems like development has been picking up a lot of speed over the last year or two. Now that they have some of the major tech finished I'm really excited to see what happens

i feel that comment

That and shard persistance will need to be more stable and a way to select our shards. I think the way shards are handled right now will be a huge blocker for base building. I think some backers will be okay with building bases in the "multiverse" (multiple shards) and other backers will insist we all have to be on one shard (or regional shards) before base building.

@@moppin cig said they will have an interim solution of being able to choose your shard, so that will probably drop in place once base building is being implemented like a year from now or more.

Truuuuuuue

True, that should be implemented when large wipes become unecessary

Does Star Citizen let you explore underwater? If it did, it would be like a new Subnautica game!

@@ErikLiberty Not that I know of. I was just comparing how base building works similarly in the two games.

​@@ErikLibertyit is possible

Kinda Reminds me of Satisfactory, with all the power generators and different types of Production machine.

@@ErikLiberty Well, we will have boats as confirmed by the SQ42 video, and we know in the lore there are big ocean planets, one of them with a city completely underwater I dunno about building anything underwater, but I'm pretty sure we will be able to both swim and dive into the lakes/oceans (both by yourself and with a vehicle)

Yes would be good if you are 16 so might get to see the game finished. 40 year olds might not lol.

I was literally like you almost 12 years ago. I was still a young guy in my 20s. With a lot of time to waste. Now i'm close to 40 and freaking convinced that maybe my kids will have a chance to play it. I have pledged to the project a lot of money which i count as the worst investment in my life. So yeah...looks really sick. Nope. You see new features as a good thing. I, who knows why this game will never be finished, see it as a root cause of the issue.

@robertschaffer596 I understand how it may feel. But in my perspective, I will still hold hope. I will say on your part, pledging to a project that seemed lucrative or too far fetched. Sure, I don't think that was a great idea. I won't pledge much money to this game. But that doesn't mean I can't hold out hope that it will take a turn for the better. I hope for the sake of the game, your money, and everyone else, that you will be proven wrong. I don't think many people will ever understand how much work goes into a game like this. If you think life around you is expensive, such as groceries, rent, etc, take a step back and imagine how it is for them as well. They have accrued this beyond realistic expectation for this game, and sure, that was fed by the beginning stages of development, but now they have been expected to take r&d and turn it into some crazy new technology never even before seen in gaming, or even thought to be possible. Do you have any idea how much money, and TIME it takes to come up with new things like that. I get it seems like "oh they have been given so much money and time" but truly, and honestly take a step back and view this whole project from a financial stand point. The things they are working on designing, making, and implementing are far more advanced than anything you or I could ever imagine making. If you want to be pessimistic about it, sure, you can. But what I see is new technology being implemented in a way that I think will prove people wrong. Look at current games that have been made. Cyberpunk, with a near 490 million dollar development. Taking almost 9 years to make. It was released as an abomination of a game with hardly any new technology being implemented in the game. Call of duty modern warfare 2. More than 300 million dollars. And again, pretty much no new features implemented anywhere. Sure, better graphics, that is about it. In the grand scheme of game development, there could be worse places the game could be. This game is a beacon for new technology, a break away from old reused technology being used at the same price as luxury. I promise you, even if this game takes another 5 years to make. What we have now is not as bad as you may think. Watch the presentation on server meshing, a MIRACLE in gaming technology, and tell me that doesn't re light your fire even a little.

@robertschaffer596 cry baby never spend more then you are willing to lose is your problem. Some enjoy playing it now as is even if never finishes

@@robertschaffer596as long as the game is playable until something better comes along, I’m good.

So a lot of this stuff has been partly worked on to some degree. Or basically finished but awaiting arrival to the PU. Also they’ll probably have more hands on deck since squadron 42 is feature complete. Making it easier to get things out. Server meshing is a must for base building to go out correctly tho. So let’s see. Either way it’s coming.

Not really, all tech is nearly complete so it coming after a year isn't strange

They have stated before that players would use the same tech they use for outpost building, so a lot of the work is already done. They probably mean they'll start concentrating on the player side of things on Q1 2024, but that's speculation on my part.

Because with a lot of 42 going into polish phase, a ton of Devs get thrown at SC 😊

And in 5 years the game will still be utterly broken and unplayable as it still is. Guaranteed.

How RUST works since its inception.

@@DerpMcDerp101 DayZ also. But Rust and DayZ take place on a tiny chunk with no option rather than build and kill someone.

Lmao

There will be personal habs in game.

@@rooster1012 i mean inside of the hangers

@@draakdeon Nope. No slumming in your hangar. You will have to either rent a place or get a motel. Or, just take your ship into orbit and sleep there.

Yo, Pyro is going to available on the new test test test server lmao , pretty soon... like before the end of this year. And SQ42 is on the home stretch. Super excited. I think the next 2 or 3 years will be REALLY big.

High security planets will have lesser value resources. No security planets will have more valuable resouces. I doubt they'll get as involved as Satisfactory.

What game???? This is the SHELL of a video game, 13 years and we have people cheering in the audience over a HANGAR DOOR OPENING???????

⁠@@MaleixonTwitchthat’s because technology that’s never been done before is being built. That video wasn’t just a video it was demonstrating the new game engine. The video also wasn’t edited at all or rendered it was pure gameplay if you wanna call it that. They were flying around in the game showing stuff.

Think the size of the base is only determined by how big of an area you can afford to claim (possibly some max size limits). The size of the construction vehicle you're using then dictate the maximum size of the buildings you can chose from.

So the Rsi Galaxy is a construction ship? Also the ground vehicle is not one we have in the game currently.

@@CopperRavenProductions The size they speak of is per building module. Not per land size. There are only two sizes of claims, 4K and 8K. Then there are the building/structure sizes, S-XL. The size of building that can be done by each vehicle/ship/system relates to how much resources they can hold and the ability to construct. Each step larger costs more money. Either you purchase the vehicle or rent out one from a player or terminal. The galaxy has a module listed for construction, and yes, the vehicle one is not even in concept yet. The smallest seems to me to be just the initial land beacon itself.

@@DarthPoyner Thanks for taking the time to explain all of that. It was really lost on me, and the Rsi really threw me off.

Then you haven't seen BoredGamer.

😂

It's an unspoken rule of this channel that states: "we shall not tell him untill we get out of beta"

Bold of you to assume i wont hang stuff from my hangar

@@2012KZfaqWasBetter Then it WOULD be a hanger AND a hangar

well, if you build a really small settlement its probably doable by yourself and maybe a couple helpers. They really thought that out so all playstyles can be accommodated. No, you can't build a near city sized "base" and run it all by yourself, cause that would be dumb.

That's not true, I solo out in nullsec a lot

i think they'd rather opt to have ai load cargo in real time if you pay them, cig isnt too keen on this instant appearance of boxes