Yeh he looked so good here!

Before wandering into the comments I was admiring the commentator. I’ll have to respectfully disagree with you this time. I will Be the one person missing him

Its a voice in off

This match gave him the Silver❤

hahahahaha awesome comment

He should be a marketing person rather than a commentator, no comment whatsoever on big points. Does he even know tennis?

And a Wimbledon title

@@maxivic1584 which one are you talking about?

@@ramasagheri9504 i am asking in which of those did del potro help him?

@@nicolasrm so he is like that party popper who neither wins himself not let's other win?!

And probably taken two medals from Djokovic.

Scot*

rip

Rip

riP

Looking at a ghost

Eeeeh... lets NOT under sell Murray. He was on fire in the final. Fed woulda had A hard time regardless

CST lol. Murray would be screwed by Federer . Saw the Wimbledon final that year? Murray was too overhyped in the Olympics that year. Sure he had a great year. But Federer would probably have won

Excuses. A great-playing Murray costed him the gold medal, not this match. Federer wasn't tired after the long SF against Del Potro. The Del Potro-Federer Olympics SF only lasted 4 hours and 26 minutes. The Nadal-Dimitrov SF in the Australian Open 2017 lasted 4 hours and 54 minutes. That is to say, the Nadal-Dimitrov SF lasted half an hour more than the Delpo-Federer one. Federer was 30 years old in the Olympics 2012 SF, just like Nadal was 30 years old in the AO 2017 SF. Followiing your logic, Nadal lost the AO 2017 SF because he was tired. To defend that Federer lost the Olympics final because he was tired, but Nadal didn't lose the AO final because he was tired is a fallacy (wrong argument) known as double standard logic (judging two similar situations by different standards, when in reality you should use the same standard).

James Walker nadal and roger are two different players , Australian open is played in Jan when players are fresh , this Olympics came after Wimbledon and its already half season end . Players would be tired .

@@harshavardhan7237 Double standard at its finest.

The full match is on KZfaq, uploaded by Olympic channel. Just search it.

Excuses. A great-playing Murray costed him the gold medal, not this match. Federer wasn't tired after the long SF against Del Potro. The Del Potro-Federer Olympics SF only lasted 4 hours and 26 minutes. The Nadal-Dimitrov SF in the Australian Open 2017 lasted 4 hours and 54 minutes. That is to say, the Nadal-Dimitrov SF lasted half an hour more than the Delpo-Federer one. Federer was 30 years old in the Olympics 2012 SF, just like Nadal was 30 years old in the AO 2017 SF. Followiing your logic, Nadal lost the AO 2017 SF because he was tired. To defend that Federer lost the Olympics final because he was tired, but Nadal didn't lose the AO final because he was tired is a fallacy (wrong argument) known as double standard logic (judging two similar situations by different standards, when in reality you should use the same standard).

@@jameswalker6864 At least in slams you get a day's break between matches. The Olympics asked you to play 6 matches across 7 days. Yes, it was Bo3 but I still think it stands to reason Fed would be a bit knackered after this match going into the next day - especially as Bo3 tournaments usually end third sets on a tiebreak, unlike those played at the Olympics.

@@jameswalker6864 Who in this comment thread claimed Nadal wasn't tired in Australia? I suspect you're treating the sum of all Fed fans as a single person. That said, I think it quite likely Fed would have lost the final here anyway.

It's true he couldn't walk at finals. So sad.

@@jameswalker6864 Difference is Federer had to play again 17 hours later

Oh yeah. Olympic 2012 and Wimbledon 2013. Delpo is to Murray what Soderling is to Federer.

Tennis sport doesn't work like that If Federer can't even play 5 Set matches is not deserved to play tennis also

@@kikaa1884 English language doesn't work like that

@@sananton2821 I am talking about Tennis sport not English OK fool bloody English Professor

@@kikaa1884 5 set matches have gaps.

What so Federer can't handle a single three-set semi-final? Give it a rest. Murray's matches with Federer were always competitive,and he beat him fair and square in the final, after beating probably the best of all time in the semi. In fact Murray was up i the 2012 Wimbledon final before it rained and the roof was put up

People even diminish Murray's achievement in winning Wimbledon 2013 because Djokovic played 5 sets in the semi. Huh well (1) Murray played 5 sets in the quarter, and (2) this is the same Djokovic who beat Murray then Nadal in two of the longest five sets in history in Melbourne in 2012, after which both of the finalists could barely stand up? That Djokovic?

@@andrewgreen5892 The key difference for Djokovic in Wimbledon 2013 as opposed to Australia 2012 was that he had 2 days of rest after playing a five setter in the semis of AO 2012, whereas he had 1 day of rest in Wimbledon 2013 because of the scheduling. The semifinal match in 2013 was played for 2 days. Again, Murray will take it in this era.

It's not as if Federer was a class apart in the 2012 final, Murray won the first set. Murray could always do Federer damage even in his first two grand slam finals, he just had big dips in concentration. When that part of his game improved and he got more aggressive, he started to win grand slams

@@andrewgreen5892 That’s true he was much more focused at some point in his career. Winning 2 Wimbledons is an incredible accomplishment, also a us open and 2 Olympics!

Annoying and tells you what is about to happen, not explaining what just happened.

It's called narration

yo creo que hubiera ganado al menos 5 o 6 Gran slam... y este partido lo pierde el, en general contra éstos monstruos llámese Roger Rafa o Djokovic además de precisión, tenés que tener mucha resistencia, y eso es lo que según yo entiendo siempre le faltó a delpo por culpa de su dolor...

Nalbandian era mejor...

Postponed

@@theo_cstb5357 so Djokovic will win it in 2021 instead of 2020.

@@serenaistheb.o.a.t okay

🤣🤣🤣

Oh, not again.

What ?

We just recently posted the Men's volleyball final from Rio. What else would you like to see?

@@Olympics Everything about tennis.

@@Olympics And the classification of the rhythmic gymnastics of Rio? Has the government not paid your copyrights like London?

@@Olympics The womens rio hockey semi finals and finals would be great, please. Been waiting over 2 years to watch them. You posted the womens semis and final hockey games from london 2012 and they were brilliant.

Federer should retire and wash utensils instead if he can't even handle 5 set matches or 3 set matches also previous rounds