But i got the 525 again i think that was a mistake! Better go for a 520 for more power?

Do you know of a 520 rear sprocket that will fit the Himalayan?

RTC Motorcycle has 520 38 & 40 rear sprockets - however they in South America.. Maybe you can ask if they ship it to you :D

not good.

Increased chain and sprocket life

not sure if there are bikes that run a 38 teeth , 520 combo. RK manufactures specifically for the himalayan hence i have the 520 rear .

Ride the bike for a while and can learn a few techniques and tips from yt you'll get comfortable with it.

But twice I had a fall with bike that's I wore sandal and plus the weight I had old enfield standard i'm ok with it

It’s very very good for winter . For summer stick to 15w 50

He already has one

@@diaryofawanderingboot4058 well no it doesn't affect torque in a negative way (interesting how you came to that conclusion) it changes torque delivery at the rear wheel by the altered gear ratios, evidently Himalayan has ample of torque it doesn't have much effect on low end grunt as tested proven by many youtubers. The only reason I see Ben didnt go for 16t sprocket is because it might be a hard source to get 520 pitch 16t sprocket for Himalayan.

@@diaryofawanderingboot4058first of all please quote me where did I say sprocket won't have any kind of affect on the bike? Coz your starting statement implies that I m off the mind that sprocket doesnt affect Performace at all! Also there are plenty of guys on KZfaq with Himalayan who have installed the bigger sprocket along with tec cam. And lastly every bike reacts differently to sprocketing based on their wheel sizes, weight, rake angle, COG, like you mentioned terrain elavation But just to reiterate what I want to convey is that for Himalayan the gain on asphalt is far bigger than the loss on off-roads, and that loss is negated if you install the cam tec. Hope this makes it clear

@@ReelsLife well since we were talking about bens bike which has/ was running stock wheel sizes , which has been set up and used primarily for trails which requires more torque than top speed, and from everything we've seen ben update here. Keeping the above in mind I said and continue to say the 16 tooth will negatively affect this bikes torque. 16 tooth would simply gear the bike taller (higher top speed with a drop in revs ) and consequent drop in torque. Now if you add a different size wheel to the mix yes you could counter that a bit ,but this bike hasn't had that done as far as my viewership of the channel. So like I said , this 16 tooth sproket theoretically and practically speaking from my own use on my bike as well will end up making the gearing taller and will negatively effect torque implying it will be lesser than before it 16tooth the is installed on this Himalayan. On another note, I wasn't aware of your condition, i apologise if my previous comment made you feel like questioning your sanity. Anyways have a lovely weekend.

@@diaryofawanderingboot4058 naah don't worry about my sanity, this isn't my first rodeo dealing with fellas jumping on to conclusions to prove a point, it's very common on the internet for people to spray their opinion on behalf of some one else. so relax it's not a unique situation it happens.

@@diaryofawanderingboot4058 people who jump to conclusions never know when and where, so relax, secondly I never understand why people consider their personal experience as "facts", in short your personal experience of your riding style preference on a differnet machine doesn't carry over to others. It was a simple question to Ben, don't know why you felt that.. just because you have an inverse experience with your road going conti.. would have the same desired effect on Ben non stock Himalayan? If you had Himalayan or a scram411 like me I would have considered your argument. So Let's just agree to disagree

thank you brother.

nothing serious brother.

@@ONTWOWHEELSBEN that's nice to hear 👍

good for you.