No I don’t think so

It should be illegal to regulate compute…

Nope. I've been a plus subscriber for the longest but I'm not giving my money to greed anymore. It was worth it when they were the best/only real option but I don't trust them if they don't trust me. Open source or bust.

@@ryanseibert1449 agreed, already switched to Anthropic

You like the sound of your own voice you are too young for this stuff. Whats good for the individual is good for the group. Whats bad for the group is good for the individual.

Its the only thing that can stop a dystopian future.

Exactly. You’re either for Open-Source, or you’re for eventual tyranny. Whether by Companies, governments, or other entities.

@@Michael-do2cg Not using AI as a slave will prevent that.

​@@orangehatmusic225yea right 👍 also, let's not keep our toasters and fridges as slaves!! Freedooooom!

You people are so confused 😔

Yup, we all called this when MS invested

Classic economics. The first thing you do after dominating a free market is to do everything in your power to make the market not free. That's why there exists laws that try and prevent monopolies.

That sounds about right. Damn

@@KEKW-lc4xi there's no such thing as free market

Funny comments coming from people who use iPhone or MacBook

same. I am actually getting brilliant copywriting from local LLMs. For writing use cases, many of these small uncensored LLMs are much better for the task. I also have a vision model now that I use to critique my photography rather than GPT4. While it isnt as good as GPT Vision, it's free

Do you think you’ll reconsider if they were to drop a huge breakthrough model, like GPT5? I’m considering unsubbing although I’ll admit I use it V FREQUENTLY

I cancelled mine a while ago and bought a 4090, I'd rather spend 3 grand and use my own local models than use their system.

12:23 me too and I told them why absolutely ridiculous

@@TheExodusLost No, I'm going to invest in an Nvidia GPU and build my own machine to run Opensource models.

That’s one of Elon’s demands in his lawsuit lol

@@jejxkxk Is that a literal demand? If yes, then it tells you how seriously you can take the lawsuit...

@@Brax1982 err… Or you could read the public filings to determine how seriously you should take the lawsuit

For sure, most of humanities weaknesses come from the inability to detect changes at a rapid rate of success. It's why AI is important so that we can detect these patterns more effectively.

aamen.

It's the indoctrination in the school systems. Schools are just political training grounds almost no useful education is actually taught just political correctness bs and dumbing down. Thr government n corporations want people dumb enough to not question but smart enough to work and pay taxes.

Nah there is reason we have blockchain and people put ton of money in it. There are still movement on decentralization, sam with ai model shared in github. But this is getting less attention, since it include a lot of hassle

Trust me when i say this. Truth is a pattern, especially with economy and war there are thousands of example. The reason people act dumb is because they dont whant to admit there wrong. And as its says " Pride leads to destruction and happens before the downfall, arrogance before the fall"....

Their security, not yours. They want to know more (everything) about you.

Same with when the throw around the word "safety"

protecting their investment - when Microsoft invested 50bn in OpenAI that was when it became about trying to make ai conform into a capitalist commercialised structure which is insane considering how transformative and expansionary technology is as a whole at the moment.

When any entity (corp govt etc) says something about security/safety, especially when it comes to MY security/safety, my instinct screams at me to immediately run far far far away from them

Microsoft has been crippling Windows 10 computers with various Updates. The January 2024 Update regarding partition sizing is proof enough.

He literally says this in the video

Llama is amazing can't wait for llama10. Open source is the only way to go. We need transparency

Llama 3 70B is good for Dialogue Engine

Its better then some model and is even better then the new gpt 4 one if you use some prompting

Wait until they finish training the Llama 3 400B model...

​@@glenyoung1809if they dont throw zuck into jail for breaching the new anti competitive laws theyre cooking up by making too good of a model without the corporate overlords approval.

Yup, time to open up open AI

Make sense as they were the first AI company to align with building foundational guidelines for govt regulations.

@@Player-oz2nk They want to protect their uncertain cash cow, and the state want to regulate everything as much as possible as they always do. Money and Control, it's not about safety; never has been, never will be.

Yeah their models are dogshit. The only that is still uncensored is gpt 3.5 turbo 0301 that will shut down next month

Yes, I agree, this is not chill

@@Eval48292 Exactly, if they want their weights protected. Build their own security. I mean a GPU has a hardware ID. Have the software check the ID, if it's not on the list, it doesn't run.

KZfaq likes to delete my comments, especially when it comes to "controversial" topics, so I'll post in parts:

Basically, most of these regulations aren't for malicious actors that would harm us.

But to make it harder for us to counter powerful forces and groups such as governments and corporations

When they enevitibly decide to use the technology against us for power and control

Open Source AI isn't the issue, but it's the greedy elites that seek to

So they arent aloud to make money? Why? Who are you to tell someone what to do with their company? I think you should volunteer from now on at your job. Bullshit you make money doing it! Make sure you prove to everyone you work for free please 😂😂😂😂 USA home of freedom or wait no people like you telling others what they should do with their life lol

Not just about money, it about control, setting up a captive consumer base who are milked constantly without any regard for ethical business practices, think the Apple business model. This is something which sounds a lot like the old 1990s Microsoft and Bill Gates, not something Ilya Sutskever would come up with. Elon Musk is going to have a field day with this news.

it's giving "in the future you will ơn nothing(everything membership based), and you will be happy(prescription drugs)" vibes

@@Porter92 I am John and I thank you so much for your opinion and I'm so happy you cared enough to read mine thank you have a nice day.

@@Porter92 oh and by the way I get disability because I am a quadriplegic so I volunteer at my job everyday I volunteer to make inspirational videos and I am damn good at my job no one is better at sitting in one place than me.

Thank you. Claude is the same price and better at both coding and writing.

@@bigglyguy8429 good to know. I mostly use gpt for coding I'll have to try that one out instead

@@bigglyguy8429 Unfortunately Claude is not available everywhere.

@@bigglyguy8429 Claude is more expensive and, frankly, not better. The most important, however, is that Claude vs ChatGPT is not a choice. No more than Windows vs MacOS. Bot are evil corps, their only difference is strength.

@@moamber1 I generally agree but as Claude is #2 I've rather vote with my money for them than keep propping up #1. Both cost me $20 a month. I'm going to put both through a strict test today, and cancel the loser.

Those who learn from history are doomed to watch as others repeat it.

You mean CIA-FBI-NSA-AI

​​@@ferd1775😂 exactly!

Elon Musk was right when he said to Altman “change it to closed Ai and I’ll drop the lawsuit 😂”

I've had the exact thought over the past few months or so, except have the petition be for them to change their name to "AI Corp"

elon shill

And Elon

@@AnthonyCook78 Elon believes in Open*, the same as Free Speech*. The disclaimer in all cases is 'for Elon but not for you'

​@@isbestlizardglad to see you got the signal! Action speaks louder than words!! 💪💪💪

Weird take: I think the focus, with the current geopolitical environment, is AI defense systems. I'm ok with closed models in that arena. Open weights on AI guided laser defenses is a vulnerability. At the same time, AI safety as far as free speech and the job market needs to be open source and there needs to be open source representation for AI at a societal level.

@@vSouthvPawv I can def agree with that

governments hate open source

Oh don't fool yourself thinking Musk would keep it open. He'd be doing the same thing, but put himself at the top.

It is their not they're* .. that one really bothered me for some reason

Sam Altman the CEO of OpenAI has been a self interested grifter his entire career. It's painfully predictable that OpenAI went from nonprofit to getting in bed with big money as soon as it became a viable product.

They did?

I remember that, way back in the late 2000s, MS is always looking for a way to maintain their monopoly and "Trusted" Platform Modules would make it such that only certain OS's would be allowed to run on consumer hardware. It was a bigger initiative than just MS but they tried to use it to guarantee a more captive market for Windows, where you didn't have a simple migration path away from their products. They hated and still hate open source OSes as being competition they didn't need.

Yes, this is EXACTLY that same system. And I'm sorry to inform you that they were successful. It is now essentially impossible to buy a PC that does not have a TPM chip. Microsoft has mandated it as a mandatory compatibility requirement for Windows 11, and Apple has been packing an equivalent chip into everything from desktops to iPhones to the iWatch. Any examination of the system makes it clear that it's a dystopian DRM system, and they had to stall to let opposition fade every time it gets reported on. They way they were successful was by slow rolling deployment - it has been nearly 30 years since the first leak from Intel that they wanted to back unique identifiers into all CPUs for something like this. And they are still slow rolling deployment. Windows 10 End Of Life is set for October next year, and I'm sure they'll hold off even longer before they activate any of the uglier and more obvious uses of the Trust system. Information recently came out from Google that they were working on using the system to prevent adblockers - if your computer didn't have a Trust chip or if your browser allowed adblockers then your browser wouldn't be able to show the website at all. Obviously that sparked outrage - and they immediately released an announcement scaling back the project to not include that. Obviously enforcing website ads is going to come back eventually, but for now Google's project is going to focus on further deploying and entrenching the Trust system in less visible ways. Quite a few years ago one of the Whitehouse Cyber Security Czars gave a public speech advocating that all computers be banned from the internet unless the computer was locked down by this kind of Trusted Computing system - with the reason being to enforce operating system updates to secure the National Internet Infrastructure against viruses and Trojans. And such a system was in fact built - it's called Trusted Network Connection. But Microsoft is only pitching it for companies to secure their internal networks. They obviously aren't going to try to deploy that on everyone - at least not for several more years. But given that this has been slow rolling for about 30 years now, yes, they almost certainly are eventually going to try to ban internet service providers from allowing ANYONE on the internet unless their computer is locked down by a Trust chip. Another 5 years? 10 years? 30 years? I dunno. Probably in response to some massive internet crisis or war, and only after everyone is used to stuff like all software being sold with Trusted DRM and all websites using Trusted DRM to prevent adblockers.

Thank you so much!

Altman has always left the same impression on me as a used car salesman. He comes across as a blend of Steve Jobs/Bill Gates and has never been pro-open source, in other words Altman is an empire builder, he's even said it himself and will do whatever is convenient for himself. I don't understand why anyone ever looked up to guy, he's comes across as "greasy" to me.

​@@glenyoung1809He's an example of the "best" deceptive strategists humanity has to offer.

Where can i find some references to open advocating pulling pytorch and tensorflow? Inhad a good look but turning up nothing.

Musk is going to have a field day with this idea, I can see the memes writing themselves. OpenAI has a right to protect their intellectual property but they don't have a right to do it by regulating my personal property and deciding what I'm allow to access or not.

@@glenyoung1809 The real question is what intellectual property? The training sets were skimmed from publicly available sources (including mine!)

@@davestorm6718 That's where we head into unknown territory, because it was trained on public data, but the weights were computed by a private organization using proprietary algorithms. This is where IP lawyers earn their pay and spend millions litigating the fine points.

Neurolink anyone? Felon is promoting brain chips. Doesn't sound free to me.

Elon musk is as bad or worse than openai. You don't want that monster winning

It hints on that they don't have an edge or as large of an edge anymore.

@@YeeLeeHawthey don’t… they just have donated compute and VC money to set on fire while they compile other peoples’ ideas.

Think about it, if AI will lead to a performance (efficiency) boost across most economical sectors, economies that don't have access to good models will have a hard time competing with those who have. We will get to a position where a handful of companies (Nvidia, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google and maybe Meta) can decide macroeconomics, they can leave entire countries out basically. That's even worse...

The guy is a gay villian... The very worst kind of villian

It's not part of his nature.

Amen.

That's something many people don't think about, they assume access to compute is a basic right, like access to water. In today's information ruled world, being cut off from compute is instant exile outside of society. Very few people can function without access to information technologies. Plus, if you're observant the major tech companies and hyperscalers are trying hard to promote cloud computing as the ultimate endpoint. They don't want people with their own PC's, they want everyone subscribed to their cloud services and all you would have at home is a"dumb" terminal or even a smartphone. They would not only own your access, they would own your data as well. Why do you think Microsoft is going to spend $100 billion over the next 5-7 years building data centers for GPUs?

Well compute gets cheap very quickly, historically. Not a good idea to invest

​@@braineaterzombie3981The economy isn't looking super good on that front. Things aren't going to be getting cheaper the way they used to, sorry.

Need a guild of the free to purchase data centers that no corporation owns. Like a community center.

You can download a quantized version and split it between the CPU and GPU and get ~4 words/second on a 24GB 4090 using a 12 GPU layers split. The limiting factor is the memory to keep these models in the GPU. These GPUs can fit a 7B or 13B model entirely in GPU memory and get a very fast performance speed. Training the models needs even more memory.

@@msclrhd Technically VRAM isn't all that expensive, if NVidia wanted to they could simply double the amount of memory on the consumer cards on the 80 and 90 level. If AMD can sell cards with 16, 20 even 24GB for less on gaming GPUs why can't NVidia? I think it's because they want to push AI hobbyists and startups towards buying the Pro level GPUs which cost 2-3x that of a 4090. They don't want lower level gaming GPUs cannibalizing sales of the pro-cards.

@@glenyoung1809 Cheaper and with more ram than Nvidia's Orin dev kits sold at 2k

This needs to happen

@@cmelgarejo it's going to be just like Kendrick, but opposite. GPT-5 and Llama 3 are gonna write the lyrics, we already know

@@vSouthvPawv Kendrick Llama?

@@msclrhd that's gonna be a new fine-tune on Huggingface within a week because you said, you know that right? 😂 If I had the hardware, I'd start training a Llamar right now. (Also, I'm glad you chose Llama for Kendrick, which means, obviously that the industry darling Drake is the corporate GPT, and that tracks)

Hmm, this would be a good way to get the masses listening to this part of the discussion... I'm in!

but but the government is on their side

Someone should make a cryptotoken about that. Offer to do sums you get tokens need to do sums you pay tokens make it massive and distributed and verifiable

Not yet...

llamagang llamagang llamagang

Agreed mostly. I'm sure they have "good intentions" with the technology they are suggesting, but it's clear to me it could be used to simply track and disable inference/training on GPUs.

Sounds like a reasonable proposal to me.

Yeah it's basically what sony does with their playstations

I agree with @Alice_Fumo here, this is a bit of fearmongering I think. What they are proposing is just a way to have a cryptographically-secure part of the GPU, like the TPM in a CPU, that will store the model weight outputs of training to prevent them being leaked unencrypted. Organizations would also be able to sign their code in a way that would only allow it to run on their own collection of GPUs and not allow you or I, or more specifically a threat actor to steal their code and run it on their GPUs while also being able to be certain their GPUs are authentic and unmodified. It is not about tracking and disabling others' GPUs, but being able to authenticate their GPUs as their own, unmodified ones, and people being able to sign their code to only run on those and only them being able to extract the weigh data output from their code on them.

@@Sqrlmasta Exactly!

I disagree, they probably sold the architecture not weights . Selling weights is equivalent to selling chatgpt itself. Altman isn't a fool to sell his only advantage

​@@braineaterzombie3981Altman is only in this to become another tech billionaire. He does not care how it needs to happen.

No MS has the weights but it’s hardly a “sale”

They have no right to call themselves "I"

The world is headed towards socialism / communism in all ways.

@@AberrantArt well in that language it's corpo fascism.. which is against my mind of hacker cyber anarchy.. just like that.. problem will be when they start to outlaw to run certain applications

@@AberrantArt It's fascism.

The departure of base llms to the ,,, format really does kill a tonne of potential that was going for gpt3 and limits the outputs of the models. Sure its highly effective and less technical for the average punter to interact with the model but its like we closed a chapter to something much more powerful.

​@@6AxisSage Yes! And I'm sure if more developers knew you can just put in examples and it'll recognize the pattern, they'd see how useful that is. Training a model on maybe 4 examples instead of millions? Few-shot on a base LLM is literally a machine learning dream come true.

@@DaeOh thats awesome that I met someone that doesnt think im speaking gibberish nonsense ❤ shame your work is under wraps but I get it. Ill be dropping more work on my channel if ur interested however, I have an especially fun model ive been running for a few days that simulates brain hemispheres thats showing a lot of interesting and novel behaviors I havent seen before.

Always the same. With psychology they made amazing innovations hundred years ago understand behaviour and the mind. Did they use it to make people more fulfilled and balanced? No.. They used it to create manipulative adverts tricking us to want things we didn't need.. creating mass wasteful consumerism. Capitalism is as evil as any regime. AI could be most beautiful gift to explore and enrich.. But it will be used to replace humans jobs, manipulate and repress us

Sounds very similar to Sony in the helldivers dispute

Why? 😊

The issue is that they seem to be calling for government regulation that would REQUIRE that for anyone who wants to compete in the AI space. If it were just for protecting their own systems, there would be no need to get the government involved.

@@mattelder1971 Those changes are just a tiny fraction of any other cost involved when working with AI models, so having to comply with it will surely not be a problem, just like we already do with many other laws for infrastructure and data security.

@@bpanatta I'm guessing that you are not in the US. We don't have the overbearing laws regarding those things that are present in the EU. It isn't about the cost, it is about the freedom of developers to build what they want, how they want it.

@@mattelder1971 Oh it makes sense. My thoughts were mostly on costs and complexity of implementation.

Not all churches are like that. it's mostly those who teach the prosperity gospel.

I think you are talking about scientology "church". The true church doesnt force you to "donate 10% and Hallelujah" as you gently put it.

@@Jwoodill2112Well, churches have gone through the so-called Reformation, and it took 1500 years to get to this point, and in most countries, it was quite a bloody process.

Anyone can talk to God. No primitive, money grubbing Church, Mosque, Synagogue or temple needed. All that just gets in the way.

Enlighten everyone, then.

​@@Alaron251He can't He thinks JesuSAM Altman does no wrong. It was very clear they want DRM AI and they want all GPUs to have hardware level DRM.