yeah working on it now

​​@@ProfessorDaveExplains hey Dave , If you do that then please also do some commentary on Capturing christianity's review of your debate which he did with a chemist . Even *clearly stated* commented that that was a great review video.

@@ProfessorDaveExplains can't wait to see it. Thank you for not backing down on calling out James Tour on being a liar. I applaud you not falling for his "come to the board". You were masterful in your deconstruction and he literally had no answers except for "what aboutisms".

@@Mrfunny663vnb83 yep I'm gonna do that too

It'd also be great to cover his nonsense about evolutionary biology, in some other debunking video. There are other suggestions for debunks : Geocentrism (Robert Sungenis documentary), and Quantum Gravity woo (Irwin Klee's documentary). These debunks are very educational, my knowledge about Origin of life research was limited, but after watching and re-watching James Tour's debunks, I started searching and learning. Thanks !

his argument on gender was so poorly made. just as much as Chinese cannot insist that I'm white, XY chromosome person cannot insist I'm female (I'm not talking about a case of gender dysphoria with XXY). also if you're only born as a male, how do you know you're female without never having experienced as female? it's like insisting I'm Martin Luther King because I feel like. what do you mean by that? how can you feel like some other identity without ever expericing the identity? gender identity is based off of majorly clear binary patterns of sex chromosome. neurochemical expression governed by those chromosomes are within it's bimodal patterns largely because the expression of chromosomes heavily set by preexisting condition whether XX or XY (again not including the exceptional cases with abnormalities (X or XXY, don't mix them up)).

@@JC-sn2hx oh wow… I was watching his interview with mr beat and he wasn’t kidding, even after a year people still are upset with him for… saying trans people exist? Grow up dude, i saw that video and everything he said was fine, maybe controversial but come on

Blueschists are, in fact, more common than you expect. They form not only in the collision but more often during subduction when the subducted relatively cold oceanic plate gets to high-pressure conditions because it is buried relatively deep under the other (often continental) lithospheric plate (if you go deeper, you'll get eclogite). So you can find them along the recent and past (up to 1 billion years - as I know, they are missing in older formations) active margins of lithospheric plates.

I have that! My store should be visible somewhere.

do they? if so, so what?

Probably very little. are you talking about them knowing of easily splittable rocks that made good large stones? They definitely knew of that, i think everyone knows of those really easy to work with rocks from that one spot, like the rivers in my area have slate and it’s really cool

Just got here, how’s the weather, 90’s f around my region

Haha always funny, it's still somewhat comfortable where i live around 27 degrees Celsius (sadly we don't do Fahrenheit)

Wait did you say heart? I _accidentally_ reported you. Whoopsie doodles!