bollox

@@jammapcb Science has caused more problems for the human race than superstition.

Probably why you flunked out?

@@NorthForkFisherman "Your flood never happened" Nah bruv. Millions of years never happened. Can't have fossilized tracks of animals, in layers, millions of years before the layers in which actual animals appeared the fake azz geologic column. “Animal tracks almost always precede body fossils in the fossil record, as paleontologist Dr Marcus Ross explains: “This is a pattern we see in several different groups, where their footprints are first, and their body parts are later. For the trilobites, for the amphibians, for the dinosaurs-the first time I find evidence of them in the fossil record, it’s from trackways, not from hard parts. From an old-earth perspective, that’s really weird, and hard to grapple with, because you have millions of years of trackway production, then ultimately the animal that made it. But that obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Because if there’s trackways, there’s animals, and those animals have bones and teeth and shells to them, why aren’t they fossilized? Instead the pattern is telling us something different: there’s no time between when somebody leaves a track and when somebody’s buried.” Dr. Marcus Ross Phd paleontologist

​@@NorthForkFisherman 🤡

My dad would drag his cows to this one holler anytime one would die. I found several fossilized rocks in that holler from cows

@@NorthForkFishermanright, because animals can faze themselves hundreds of square feet into solid stone right ? I believe that !

Yeah, quite clever lies, costum tailored for people who know nothing about geology.

Mount Saint Helens showed that to be true!

And nothing says the rate of processes is constant either. Even the speed of light is slowing!

true! what got me was the findings of marine fossils up high, God created creatures day 5/6.

I have always read it as nothing but water, in the beginning. Then God created land, some of which became dry land.

It's quite interesting that the further planets that we know, Neptune, Uranus and the dwarf Pluto have ice because they are furthest from the sun yet our Earth also has ice although not covered by it. Makes me wonder if God created water first, if it wasn't ice, but I don't know much about science to understand that concept.

But the creatures in the sea were not created till day 5, and birds were created then too. The land creatures, came on day 6, so water would no longer have covered the earth when animals were being created.

and the Earth was created before the stars,

no room for interpretation they have their minds made up already.

It's a geological presentation from a biblical perspective, as opposed to a geological presentation from a naturalistic perspective, which the mainstream view is. So they are both geological presentations from the perspective of particular (but different) presuppositions.

@@THUTH-ix3tt "That means it is made up..." So you're not interested a sensible discussion, only in maligning. Not surprising.

yes, let's see the atheist perspective its equally biased.

The theory of evolution is philosophical and nor scientific. No one saw the Big Bang, the formation of the solar system and the Earth, or the genesis of life on Earth. Experimental or observational science is the study of things which can be seen and studied. Origin science is a philosophical view of something which has occurred but cannot be observed and studied. The beginning of the universe, the solar system, and the Earth was not and cannot be proved by experimental pr observational science; it requires a secular or religious philosophical answer. Scientists recently found an underground ocean which contains three times the amount of water in the Earth's oceans; that explains how there could be enough water to cover the entire Earth.

Only if you ignore pretty much all the details.

@@NorthForkFisherman Like what details? Please explain. The details matter.

@@sliglusamelius8578 Pollen deposition. The heat balance. The obvious violations of natural laws that are required of almost all sedimentary deposits. Ostracods. Fusain deposits. And on and on. Now, you need to tell us all here how a global flood solves all these problems. You do understand what I'm talking about? Right?

@@sliglusamelius8578 For openers, a lot of fossils are buried by sandstorms and even tree sap (amber). Even some fossils buried in water are formed by processes incompatible with the turbulence from a supposed global flood (or even a local one).

@@curious968 Silt would be deposited as the flood receded.

I’m genuinely curious, not trying to troll or be contentious. What makes you think there was a global flood 10,000 years ago? According to the Biblical timeline figured from the genealogies, the Flood would’ve been more recent either ~2,300 BC or ~2,700 BC depending on whether using the Mesoretic or Septuagint dates.

@@jefffinkbonner9551 While I basically agree with you Jeff, I have heard variations from 2,300 BC to 3,400 BC. Certain scriptures, like you mentioned and I forget the mans name. It has to do with Earths wobble, like a ringing bell. Anyway, *_God Bless_*

6,000 years .

Appolgies age of the world since Adam 6000 years.

its not though... no genocidal layer..... meteor yes... flood no. Stop listening to these fucking retards.

@Johnson Knoxville that’s crazy talk

@Johnson Knoxville Mormon?

The canyon is believed to be carved out by a lake being drained after the Flood.

The same is true of an atheistic scientist, as Dr. Snelling points out. Occam's Razor -- the simplest explanation is the best -- section of the video discusses how point of view affects interpretation of fossil record.

and an atheist evolutionist also has a biased view.

It has to do with rising floodwaters, and the different areas of where those creatures would have lived.

@@Hydroverse Doesn't work. Why would they be segregated by "area" like that? If there was no extinction as science recognizes it, there is no reason to expect the stratification of fossils we observe. Pterosaurs, if nobody else, should be mixed into all the layers, depending on when and where an individual fell from the sky. Animals living in tall trees (as in today's rainforests) should be buried together, whether they are from today's fauna or what science says are ancient. Not all dinosaurs were large and other animals other than dinosaurs lived during the dinosaur age as well. Yet, dinosaurs, regardless of age, tend to be buried together. In fact, there are three distinct ages of dinosaurs science detects and they don't intermix. "The flood" is not a good explanation as to why because (for instance) there are large plant eating dinosaurs in every dinosaur age, but they are still strictly segregated in the record. We also have areas where the given stratification indicates a very different climate than today's. For instance, there are rock layers in Antarctica that show a tropical flora and fauna. But these are particular layers only. There's a lot that would be different if so many creatures died in a global catastrophe and there was no extinction before the flood.

God shut Noah and everyone else in (Gen 7:16).

Why should I believe anything in the bible? It is fairy tales, bad history and barbaric "morality".

if it was a flood, its not only water but land aswell, it grinds away every evidence where the flood passes through

95% of fossils are sea creatures.

@AnonYmous-yj9ib Yes, and evidence can be misinterpreted and manufactured. Which is why, lawyers and not scientists" run the world. Evidence, shmevidence.

they would have lived in different areas than dinosaurs most likely i mean would you live next to them?

@@marcusmuse4787 the dinosaurs were long gone by then.

Are you saying that the rocks migrated?

@@EB-pi9dt Do you know about tectonic movements?

@@EB-pi9dt continent migrate. Australia moves 25 mm a year north into asia.

the great fountains of the deep burst forth and that would have definitely affected plate tectonics.

What matters is evidence and geologists have not found evidence of a global flood.

@@JLBorges2803 - There is a massive amount of evidence of a global flood. Many of the great MYSTERIES of geology are themselves evidence. An unwillingness to accept them as such does not change that fact. _"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it."_ *_Mahatma Gandhi_*

@@freemind..what mysteries are you referring to? Floods leave very particular deposits behind, without one that covers the globe fail to see how any mysteries point to a global flood

@@JLBorges2803 - You are right that Floods leave behind evidence, and a global flood would leave evidence beyond that left by any other type of flood; evidence that is largely misunderstood because normal floods are not capable of producing such evidence. I'll lay out a few of these here, but there are far too many to discuss in great detail. Hopefully some of these examples will ring true and open the eyes of someone reading this.. as they did with my own.

@@JLBorges2803 *GLOBAL FLOOD EVIDENCE* *1) Surface Deposits of Fine-Grained Basalt* - There are non-vesicular basalt deposits on the surface of every continent in the world. An example of "Vesicles" are the holes in lava rock which are from gases escaping as the lava cools. The only place on Earth that non-vesicular basalt is forming today is at the bottoms of the oceans. Why?? *Because to get fully non-vesicular basalt, it must be extruded under **_AT LEAST 9,800 FEET OF WATER._* Non-vesicular basalt deposits on the surfaces of all the world's continents is evidence that *all the world's continents* were at one point covered by at least 9,800 feet of water! By the way, those basalt deposits are demonstrably YOUNG and *cannot be more than several thousands of years old,* as indicated by their *obvious LACK OF EROSION.* *2) Topsoil* - The Global Flood happened in 2345 BC, so around 4,400 years ago. An interesting time-frame corroboration is *topsoil.* Based on global averages, it takes around *500 years to form one inch of topsoil.* The global average amount of topsoil extant today is *9 inches.* Therefore *ALL of the world's topsoil was created in the last ~4500 years... a significant proof since all topsoil would have been scoured away by the Flood.* Otherwise, we would expect to see *massively thick topsoil* that formed over millions of years in at least some areas of the world.. *but there are none.* We should also see *multiple previous layers* of topsoil at various points in the geological column, that have been buried by younger sedimentary layers.. *but there are none.* *3) Petrified Pine Cones* - The Global Flood was a *one-time event* that happened in the *Springtime* of the year 2345 BC. Petrified pine cones confirm both of these claims. All fossilization and petrification occurred during the Global Flood. We can confidently say this because there are very specific requirements for the lithification of organisms; these requirements are Super-Saturated Water, High Temperatures, and High Pressures. *During the Global Flood was the only time in history that the environment was right for fossilization/Petrification.* Petrified pine cones have been found all over the world, but *no one has ever found one that was OPEN.* All have been *CLOSED with SEEDS still inside.* This means that the petrification process began during a very limited stage of development, which could only have been in the Springtime. Since we have never found an open petrified pine cone anywhere on Earth, but have found closed petrified pine cones worldwide, we can know that they are the product of a *SINGULAR WORLDWIDE EVENT that began in the SPRINGTIME.* Again, this could only have been produced by *Noah's Flood.* *4) Salt Domes* - Virtually *PURE-SALT salt domes could never be formed over millions of years through evaporation or any other process. The vast geological ‘evaporite’ deposits are not evaporates.* Do scientists even know the actual *ORIGIN OF SALT??* Most do not. *The largest single-mineral rock formation in the world is taller than the tallest mountain on the Earth. It is a salt dome, it is underground, and it is more than 7 MILES high.* Scientists have tried to explain their formation, but all theories have failed. One of the most difficult aspects to explain is the *purity of the domes.* *At many salt domes, the salt is 99% pure sodium chloride, or halite.* The Avery Island salt dome is 99.25% NaCl. The Dundee and Sylvania salt body in Michigan is 99.89% NaCl. Salt from the Redmond Salt Mine in Utah is 97.97% sodium chloride. *Evaporation is a slow process.* In the time it takes water to evaporate and crystals to form, *silt, sand, or other detritus* would be blown or washed over the deposits. If the *evaporate theory* were true, *thousands of layers of impurities should be evident,* as they would have accumulated in these natural deposits. However, these layers are generally *non-existent in salt domes.* There is a huge amount of information to unpack here.. so I'll cut to the chase: *Salt and Oil share a common origin..* which is why they are found together. That origin? *MICROBIAL WASTE.* There are *3 critical factors for SALT CREATION:* *1- Acid-Base Biosalt Origin -* Natural salts originated from the neutralization of chemical acids and bases created by the proliferation of biological waste. *2- High-Temperature / High Pressure Environment -* Large salt deposits form only in supercritical conditions, when salt-water is at an elevated temperature and pressure, like those found in the depths of the ocean. *3- The Global Flood Event -* The only time in world history where both the Biosalt origin of salt and the requisite global environmental conditions existed, creating kilometers-thick deposits of pure salt throughout the upper crust of the Earth. *5) Arch Formations* - *6) Skipperocks* - *7) Pedestal Formations* - *8) Alluvial Fans* - *9) Obsidian* - *10) Columnar Basalt* - *11) Double-Terminated Crystals* - *12) Limestone, Dolomite & Loess* - *13) Oil, Gas & Coal* - *14) Pyrite* - *15) Ore* - *16) Surface Chalcedony* - *17) Geodes* - *18) Rock Varnish* -

The pre-flood layers would mostly be creation-week layers.

Those animals would not have fossilized

This guy speeks to fast its a presentation not debate where you take it slow and can ask question

To be fair, if one starts with God creating creatures out of the ground, then anything is possible. I do suspect though that Noah's Flood was part of a much bigger catastrophe. There's volcanism on Venus, Mars, Europa, Io, and other worlds. There are also galaxies colliding and being rapidly consumed by the supermassive black holes (as it is indicated by their jets), which coincides with 2 Peter 3:10. If true, then superluminal acceleration can be linked to the evidence of accelerated nuclear decay, and any infrared radiation that was emitted could have undergone a massive Doppler Effect to mitigate the heat that atomic decay normally causes as infrared radiation is converted into other wavelengths.

No, there is nothing that could accelerate nuclear decay on this planet.

@@snaptrap5558 Do you know that decay doesn't change in different gravity fields? That's a condition that everyone overlooks, and doesn't think to consider.

@@snaptrap5558 Yes, and that is pointed out. But sometimes, just to play along, scientists will agree to "assume" that nuclear decay can be accelerated even as we don't know how it could happen. When one does that, one gets ungodly amount of heat from compressing four billion years of planetary radioactive decay to a single year. So, the amusing answer is "even if you could do it, you'd destroy the planet." Creationists are, as I type, busily trying and failing to square this particular circle.

I personally believe they happened after the Flood since craters are found on top of flood rocks. It's my thought that the asteroids would be responsible for breaking up the crust. This is based on the asymmetry of the reconstructed continental crust being more broken up than the oceanic crust. Also, recombining the continents makes it apparent that most of the divergent boundaries are located within the supercontinent, while most convergent boundaries are found around the continent's perimeter. Lastly, it can be deduced that the axial tilt has changed. I say this because day and night are seasonal changes in the higher latitudes. If God originally created the entire world to be inhabited with vegetarians, then higher latitudes would have needed sunlight year-round. This translates to a smaller tilt, which would be closer to the Moon's orbital plane like other planets and their moons.

Then why don't the asteroid impacts appear in ancient writings? They clearly dwarf the Flood, and caused global impact winters, plus failure of vegetation stocks on a worldwide basis, which led to global mass extinctions. They also introduced Iridium and ash layers in geological strata that evidence the extent of their impact. Then on pre-Flood vegetarianism theories, we have fossilized dinosaurs that have fossilized animals inside as part of their last meals...

It was recorded in 2005. Thanks for watching.

Did you find out? I’m curious too.

The bee specimen shown by Dr. Snelling in this video is an imprint of a Palaeovespa florissantia or in layman's terms, an extinct type of "wasp." It was no larger or smaller in size than the various types of wasps we see today.

Why's that?

Both can be possible. I kind of side on the old Earth theory.

You should read Dr Walt Brown's book, free PDF version online. "The Hydroplate Theory" Bryan Nickel's channel has videos explaining, graphically as well as having the address for the free PDF. Dr Brown's book can also be purchased in hardcover, with excellent photographs along with the physics involved.

That wouldn't have accounted for enough water to cover the mountains.

@@RS54321 Mountains didn't exist befofe the flood. They rose up after.

@@RS54321 in psalms 104 it says the hills went up and the valleys went down so the mountains weren't at their current levels and mt Everests summit is made of limestone, so it was definitely underwater and not just that mountain, but they all have evidence of being submerged. So, the bible is correct the mountains were underwater. Now there's just the timeframe of when and how this happened. if the great fountains of the deep burst forth that would have affected plate tectonics.

@@marcusmuse4787 That makes a lot of sense. I've thought about this since I posted my previous comment-thanks for the reply.

I doubt the date was exact. Did you witness it?

Go to the Ark Encounter in Kentucky and it puts Evolution next to the young earth Creation.

@@joinjen3854 This is the aproximate date for this phony event given by Young Earth Creationists. It is impossible to test as it is based on nonsense.

@@joinjen3854 No thank you, I get lied to far more than enough just refuting creationist nonsense on KZfaq, I refuse to pay Ken Ham my money for more lies.

@@walkergarya May God bless you anyway.

Lol... Terrible explination

thar channel is a joke

Sad but true.

No theory is in the Bible, so I'm not sure where you're getting at.

Your right , I worded it wrong thankyou for that, that bible is the one true book of our past, present and future ,yes this "book" of such Holy,Godly power to the believer nonsense to those that are to parish by disbeliefth.

Another fun one to ask about is fusain deposits. Also pollen and ostracods! Creationists never know what to say at that point.

maybe they were formed after.

@@marcusmuse4787 So then the fossils aren't all formed in the same event

The Flood was progressive over a period of months. You'd have a wave of water carrying sediments inland, and then they'd be temporarily exposed to allow creatures to leave their footprints in the soft sediments.

@@Hydroverse The Bible doesn't say this. It says that there was a sudden inrush of water and constant rain, which killed everything. Nowhere does it talk about gentle tides coming in and out over months, which would have destroyed foodprints. How many fossilized footprints do you find at the beach? None, because the tide destroys them, lol.

By "elevator-type setting", are you referring to his comment that under the mainstream view the land would have had to sink below the sea level and rise above it several times in succession? I believe that IS the mainstream view, not Snelling's. And that is what you're proposing for the Fossil Bluff formation that you are questioning. For more information on that, find the article "Tasmania’s fossil bluff" by Snelling.

The mountains were formed simultaneously by extreme volcanic activity and earthquakes

@@Hope-kx9lz You don't get sedimentary rock from volcanoes.

The sedimentary rocks were formed alongside volcanic layers. Once those sedimentary rocks were partially set, then they were folded in the following generations to where you have marine fossils at higher elevations.

@@Hydroverse That's not what we see in the geologic column

Because young earth creationists want to ignore and deny the real evidence to defend their fantasy evidence and beliefs.

tree ring data has rings science can't determine what they mean even one your atheist hero's bill nye agrees with that.

Are you looking at this as an Atheist/scientist or a believer? you might have a biased opinion either way. You find what you're looking for.

The Flood would have taken place while the Earth still had one supercontinent (I personally believe it was more circular after putting South America into the Ross Sea and Africa into the Weddell Sea). Given how the sedimentary layers and coal beds line up when reconnected, then the continent would have remained intact throughout the Flood. A century later would mark the beginnings of Continental Drift and the Ice Age during the days of Peleg. With the original ocean currents there would be warmer waters brought up from lower latitudes to higher latitudes. This would create two massive glaciers. The North Glacier would stretch from upper North America to Europe and northern Asia. The South Glacier would cover almost half of South America, all of Antarctica, the southern portion of Africa, and lower parts of Australia/ New Zealand. These glaciers would form rapidly due to the constant supply of snow/freezing rain coming over the arctic and antarctic regions. Only when the continents moved further along as mountains were formed would the ocean currents change alongside changes to the atmospheric circulation. This would lead to the melting of certain glaciers, and would cause extensive flooding like the Mississippi Valley as water drained into the Gulf of Mexico. This would lead to another climate shift as the loss of ice on continents would make them lighter, and the oceans would get higher. Any ecosystem that depended on the meltwater from the ice would have perished. Eventually the system has reached close to an equilibrium of what we have today.

No.

Possibly the Missoula flood that happened quite a few times in the ice age

@@jeffreyhusack2400 Wrong part of the world, but working with real data. There are specific scablands that do exist and were carved during the recurring floods as the glaciers collapsed and rebuilt themselves. This is also similar to what we see in the Great Lakes and the submerged falls in Lake Huron.

Where did the heat go?

Nope. There is very little science that does NOT refute the fairy tale of Noah's flood.

What about the mass body of water found underground ? That amounts to the global flood type level of water

@@karlirosek the earth is covered to 70% of its surface area by water so there's no way there's an amount near that underground. A worldwide flood would have wiped out tens of millions which it didn't as it never happened.

@@petergreen2552 uhhhh, you know how to do research orrrrrr ???

@@karlirosek You certainly don't Provide a citation to support your claims.

@@NorthForkFisherman look it up i wont wipe your ass for you

If you go by faith in your bible, you are a fool.

The fact that it was 'snap frozen' in the act of giving birth shows very sudden burial. The fact that it was preserved in such detail shows that burial was sudden and deep, not allowing for decay.

@@PJRayment Guess I need to refer you back to my comment. No one can demonstrate one way or the other that it was in the midst of the "act". In any case every animal is doing something when it dies. Furthermore, things can be buried rapidly. Geologists are aware of it. They can identify landslide type events from the debris field in the rocks. All that is needed are weathering and gravity. But, that's giving a lot of latitude to the premise. I would wager that the ichthyosaur is buried in limestone, which isn't compatible with the flood scenario-the native particles are too fine. But there are big piles of calcareous goop at the ocean bottom today. Great environment for counteracting scavengers

@@patldennis Nobody can prove conclusively what was happening, but people _can_ draw reasonable inferences, and palaeontologists often do. Why is limestone not compatible with the flood scenario? That is, what is it about fine particles that make it a problem?

@@PJRayment we don't prove things in science. More accurately we falsify things.. in this case what didn't happen. Such phrasing reveals you don't understand the scientific method. Apologists cherry pick that which suits their narrative whereas actual scientists constantly try to dismantle the thing they actually think is at play. Indeed, paleontologists have incidentally falsified a YE narrative. Limestone whether chemical or biological or in between, is a by product or an indicator of the presence of particular conditions. It is not amenable to a one size fits all explanation like duh flood.

@@patldennis "we don't prove things in science." Yes, I agree. "Such phrasing reveals you don't understand the scientific method." Sorry, _what_ phrasing? I didn't say that science _can_ prove things. "Apologists cherry pick that which suits their narrative whereas actual scientists constantly try to dismantle the thing they actually think is at play." Pull the other one. Christian apologists have a commitment to truth (that comes from the Bible). Scientists don't try and dismantle evolution-it's a given, a framework in which they do their historical science. Yes, they'll argue about the details, but not the paradigm. "Indeed, paleontologists have incidentally falsified a YE narrative. " How have they supposedly done that? Without invoking naturalism (which they all invoke)? "Limestone whether chemical or biological or in between, is a by product or an indicator of the presence of particular conditions." Yeah, okay. "It is not amenable to a one size fits all explanation like duh flood." Why not? The flood would have created, and operated in, many different conditions.

One is a lie. You worship God in truth!

Without Genesis Jesus is just a middle eastern dude

@@yes2truth if your faith is found in a book full of errors, mistakes, and contradictions, you've been dupped beyond reason,for a very long time

@@yes2truth the prophecy of isaiah had nothing to do with Jesus... it's about the country of israel...kudos for trying though... scriptures from a book loaded with errors, mistakes, and contradictions,are meaningless

@@yes2truth And yet, here you are. Using a piece of technology that is entirely dependant on the laws of physics and the mind of man for its creation. Your book of folklore and myth doesn't cover that too well, does it? But then again, this video isn't about that, is it? It's about a flood that never happened.

@@yes2truth See, the problem is that I do know quite a bit. And oftimes, more about the dogma that you regale as fact when it certainly is not. In the end it's about the details, because they do indeed matter. For example, the first thing that disproves your literal interpretation of Genesis is the amount of energy in the system. I'll make it simple for you, Chucky: Where did the heat go?

​@@yes2truth And there we have it, ladies and gents. The deep and abiding ignorance that is the hallmark of the YECer. You know nothing of either the myth you try to defend much less the data that directly contradicts it. See Chuckles, you're here because of two SDAs named Whitcomb and Morris who wrote a little book called "The Genesis Flood" in which they try to bastardize science into supporting their claims about a Noachian Deluge. Same as you, they very studiously avoid talking about details like the amount of heat moving in the system from all the exothermic formations in the Earth's crust. As a member of the STEM community I have more than a passing familiarity with the processes and sciences involved. And to be perfectly honest, it's a simple question. Where did the heat go?

I don't think that's a question which needs to be answered.. we see flash fossilization, animals fossilized while giving birth etc. There's also living fossils from every 'mass extinction event'.

Fossils can be formed very quickly, given the right conditions. Further, fossils _require_ sudden and deep burial, which doesn't occur on a large scale except with something like a global flood. Mainstream scientists have a naturalistic agenda. They apply a principle known as "methodological naturalism", which involves ignoring evidence that favours a supernatural explanation.

@@PJRayment there is no such thing as evidence from nature that favors a supernatural explanation.. you're using the definition of philosophical naturalism for MN. Fossils don't require sudden and deep burial either. If all fossils were a consequence of the same event we'd see a homogeneous mixture of fossils encased in a homogeneous matrix of some sort of complex sediment across the globe..We don't however. Many taphonomies don't suggest anything remotely similar to that. Whole ecosystems with biotic and abiotic components are preserved intact.

@@patldennis "there is no such thing as evidence from nature that favors a supernatural explanation.." What's your evidence for that claim? And why wouldn't there be? "you're using the definition of philosophical naturalism for MN" Nope. MN says that supernatural explanations can't be considered. "Fossils don't require sudden and deep burial either." Experiments show that they do. If the burial isn't sudden, they will rot away before they fossilise. If it's not deep, they will still rot before they fossilise because there is still oxygen and bacteria in shallow sediments. There may be some rare circumstances where things are different, but that's the general requirement. "If all fossils were a consequence of the same event we'd see a homogeneous mixture of fossils encased in a homogeneous matrix of some sort of complex sediment across the globe.." Why would we? We are talking about a year-long global flood probably involving rapid plate tectonics. That would result in multiple currents in various directions in different local circumstances. And we'd expect sea-bottom creatures buried first, followed by other marine creatures, followed by coastal creatures, and so on. Rather like what we do see! "Whole ecosystems with biotic and abiotic components are preserved intact." Which would require sudden, deep, and widespread burial. The kind that a global flood would produce.

@@PJRayment evidence found in nature is natural evidence. If something is tangible (ie can be measured) then it is natural, not supernatural). This is a simple paradox you're not grasping here. It is by definition impossible to have evidence of the supernatural, bc if you can sense it in one way or another it ceases to be supernatural. Once again,, MN says that the supernatural can't be considered out of practical necessity. PN says that it has to be considered bc it is all that exists, anyway. Plenty of fossils show evidence of decay , modification by scavengers etc. Fossils in amber, permafrost, and the La Brea targets didn't require deep burial. Some fossils show that organisms were clearly breathing and succumbed to things like volcanic ash before latrr.being buried. A dead fish can sit on the bottom of an anoxic lake indefinitely befire being buried completely (Decay by bacteria and fungi requires oxygen.) A global flood would homogenize and mix up whole ecosystems. It wouldn't allow for the conditions for limestone, siltstone and sandstone to form as individual discrete strata, nor would it keep primitive ferns separate from flowering plants. Have you ever seen footage from a tsunami. Do you have any inkling of how many people went missing in the 2004 tsunami? It certainly didn't bury them where they were-it took them out of their context and put them in another environment

The Bible clearly states that the fountains of the great deep were broken up. It also makes clear that there was a canopy of water surrounding the earth that God caused to break up and rain down on the earth.

@@yes2truth the same Moses that also recorded his death and burial?

@@yes2truth oh boy...you must have been brainwashed at an early age,huh?

@@yes2truth you mean the man who said he liked Jesus,but he didn't like Christians, because they are nothing like Jesus,and don't follow his teachings?

@@yes2truth you're gonna have to do better than that, little buddy

@@raymondgrimaldi9207 Bullseye on the quote about Xtians, and for the bonus point - MC's ironic use of Gandi. It's akin to that one from Romans that YECers spew right before they run away.

Because he's not a real scientist

And he's lying his ass off. We embrace reality. Even if it isn't what we think it is. And we're humble before it as we tease out its secrets. Only an idiot thinks that a Bronze Age herding culture had all the answers.

Why? Articulate your point clearly. Why is it an "extremist point of view"?

@@NorthForkFisherman if people could conceive of millions, or billions of years, they would never be fooled by the charlatan extremist, Social Darwinists. Social Darwinism is a gentler term for "Nazis" and "Marxists", who are extremists. They all have the same agenda, applying "selection pressures " (killing) to "breed superior humans ", to quote Karl Marx. These extremist ideologies have not gone away. They literally just changed the names to Neo-Nazis, Neo-Liberals, and Woke. Beware of extremists, fanatics, and elitists. They are ravening wolves in sheep's clothing.

@@valerieprice1745 Darwin was a botanist and biologist; he had nothing to do with social issues. The earth as proven to be 4.567 billion years old.

@@maylingng4107 wrong. Darwin was a GEOLOGIST. His books, Origin of Species and Descent of Man were not scientific. They were popular books, meaning basically pseudoscience. They were never subjected to scientific rigor, and they were packed with racist, antifeminist, antisemitic language. It's a wonder they're still in print! Charles Lyell was a well connected lawyer, NOT a geologist, and he was the one who came up with "millions of years ". He was also an antisemite, whose stated goal was to "get Moses (Jews and also the Bible) out of science. " Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, and Karl Marx laid the foundation for the Holocaust. Marx had some Jewish ancestry, but his writing against Jews was horrible. If you ever actually read anything they wrote, you would know this, but you might be influenced to become a radical antisemite chauvinist.

@@NorthForkFisherman because the numbers are so big, they're actually theoretical. In other words, you can't actually conceive of numbers so large with a human brain. Such numbers are meaningless to humans. And there's nothing scientific about Lyell's ideas. It was all conjecture and speculation. Anyway, Lyell has been debunked, because his "evidence " for millions of years turned out to be deposits from a fairly recent volcanic eruption. And yet, Uniformitarians still rule science with an iron fist, destroying geology.

People just want to live satisfying d ck

You have only to look who nowadays pays his paycheck to understand his motivation.

lol

That’s just it, it didn’t, it’s a young earth.

Sorry I don't have all the answers, but as far as question 2 goes I am willing to bet you believe science as long as it does not involve a higher power or authority. So, when tectonic plates collide mountains are thrust upward. The mountains were not as high during the flood. Yes, I do believe in scientific observation, but science cannot prove all the answers either, can they? Science is the study of how God did what He did...

@@rickb2267 There was no global flood. It is a fairy tale, nothing more.

book of jasher ??? Most Christians don't even read that as scripture.

there's mountains of evidence for the global flood you're just looking at it with an atheistic lense.

they've got the dating wrong just like the bones of the heathen army found in england in the 1980's they were off by 200 years because they vikings only ate fish and fish have less carbon 14. so if the whole world was covered in the waters with less carbon 14 the dates are wrong.

Unhelpful post walker...all these have been addressed, Study up... come back

@@paulwood6636 No liar, these have NOT been answered. Oh, I have gotten replies and denial that these are relevent, I have recieved fairy tales and outright lies, but nothing that is worth more than a dog turd on the sidewalk, which, come to think of it, is all the Noah's Ark story and the whole bible is worth. Have a nice day.

The manmade created calendar is off by years so we have estimated time by studying not only the Bible but what was found in the history of archaeology and the study of the land from what I understood. We use carbon dating which is estimated to be factual but is it since those carbon dating funds are said to go back millions of years? We don't know all the unimaginable facts of nature of our own Earth nor are we supposed to know all the facts of Creation but are to trust that our Creator whom most call God, is fact that we may have eternal life through Christ Jesus.

@@yvetteschneider5172 The manmade created calendar is off by years so we have estimated time by studying not only the Bible but what was found in the history of archaeology and the study of the land from what I understood. We use carbon dating which is estimated to be factual but is it since those carbon dating funds are said to go back millions of years? We don't know all the unimaginable facts of nature of our own Earth nor are we supposed to know all the facts of Creation but are to trust that our Creator whom most call God, is fact that we may have eternal life through Christ Jesus.

All of these have been addressed, many in the bible if youd simply read it. As far as Egypt, its clear the people who build the megalithic structures are NOT the people who made the hieroglyphs