Notice the flat earth map

@@williamnordeste9653 what does this have to do with anything?

Not only that, but also that in genesis 3;17-19 God tells adam that: Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil (FARMING) you will eat food from it all the days of your life. 18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground,

@@emmanueldominguez2403 exactly, farming has been going on since the beginning. Try telling the expert archioligigist that.

@@dougwood6387 : Farming began about 9,500 BC and humans have been around for 100-250 thousand years. And who do those experts think they are? Experts?

Really? Thanks Spock.

How dare you give evidence.😂

Cool

Wish I had that kind of smarts.

Just watching news and some idiot scientists claim a planet billions of miles away seems to have a bit of oxygen and hydrogen - and be a possible future home! They get massive salaries for such fairy tales!

The mazzaroth. Mentioned in the book of Job, the oldest book in the Bible. The constellations were already named then. The constellations originally told the story of Christ.

@@TempleoftheSon Job 38:22 also tells how in a few years time vast numbers of people will die from giant hailstones: 22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail, 23 Which I have reserved against the time of trouble, against the day of battle and war?

@@TempleoftheSon GOD put the stars in the sky just to look pretty. In Creation and until The Flood there was no need to know seasons for planting as all Earth had a nice warm moist climate perfect for natural abundant plant growth to feed all creatures and humans. Try read and understand GENESIS.

@@TempleoftheSon Yes I heard somewhere that a tradition supposedly was that Adam told his descendants of Yehovah's plan of History by the Stars of Constellations. Beginning with the name of the brightest Star in a given Constellation which has meaning in it's name and then to the next Star in order of magnitude and so on. Many Star names have been lost and forgotten I suppose.

You believed evolution was wrong but accept an archaic book written by dessert dwelling goat herding ignorant primitives thousands of years ago as truth? You should have payed more attention in school and what the scientist have to say about evolution. Or in the case of the age of earth geologists have said.

@@TwistedElbow24 what sort of dessert did they live in Banana cream pie ? Tell me it was I love Banana cream pie 😂 sorry couldn't resist ,I am on your side on this

@@johnmudd6453 just don't tell them that if eve came from Adams rib, Eve would be a man genetically. Looks like God created Adam and Steve instead :)

Science always provides better answers than religion... That should have told you that your indoctrination was wrong.

If the Bible doesn't line up with science, the Bible is wrong

Evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. Evolution is the scientific fact that explains the diversity of life

@@logicalatheist1065 Akshualley ree taard- it's still called the theory of evolution, not the law of evolution for a reason, maybe you should check that out before you come and spew your bullshit.

@@logicalatheist1065 Evolution is a fairy-tale belief.

@@logicalatheist1065 Of course evolution is a scientific fact. God thought of it and designed man with the ability to change slightly under prolonged environmental conditions, what you call "evolve". If you don't believe me, then just force yourself to read Genesis chapter 18, where it writes about the "curse" that God placed upon all living things. Such as the appearance of thorns on some plants. The changes that occurred in child birth for the women, etc. If you know anything about genetics then you know that these are all GENETIC changes--or in other words: "evolution". So please don't continue to spew your ignorance about who created "evolution" because the Bible documented it thousands of years ago.

​@@logicalatheist1065That would be know as adaptation.

Noah was from Atlantis before it sank abd the floods came ... Noah couldn’t predict when a storm would arrive , but could predict when his island would sink..

​@@elizajayne2888That's a great idea for a story but since the bible doesn't mention any of that I'll just ignore it.

Correct. Genetics don't lie, people do.

Allison Cicero that is not so. People died at an early age. As we get older we get sicker.....hence more people getting sick. We are also getting better at diagnosing disease. If Cicero is your name....look up the Roman Orator Cicero. The flu is evolving...Evolution

@@pennychurchward1481 that is what he said, natural selection/variation on a theme/ micro evolution

😊

What's a soul eh...

What seems should be correct, is in fact, what you said, that is, man "became" a living soul. And it stands to reason that as we become older, we also become wiser and with that we see and understand the value of the living soul and the sanctity of mind, God and life in a purer un adalterated way. There happens to be some word play in which the bible illustrates its intentions from the beginning, but does a good job through out explainig its purposes and propositions as to the reasoning why by unfolding its mysteries to the open eye and ear. Like the Blues Brothers said ,very simply put, Im A Soul Man.

@@lancecarter100 yes, the part of our personal trinity called the soul, is the part that God put within us all so he could 'commune' with us. That still small voice he uses to guide us thru life. The Spirit and Body are also there, which serve other purposes

And a dead soul is not a ghost.

@@gsgidney trinity is a pagan belief. Not from God.

Read the Spirit of Prophecy volume one by EGWhite for your specific answers.

@@lynbf691 Nope. These points, and 1000 more, conclusively show that there was no Global Flood.

Don’t bother trying to show facts and evidence to these people, they just refute it because it doesn’t follow their old book of myths and legends. I feel sad for them but more so I feel more sad for their children who are being raised ignorant and brainwashed.

@@michaeljameson6468 You should know a lot about being ignorant and brainwashed!

@@garywalker447 The natural man will scoff and mock God's word and replace it with lies!

Also technological advances with births and infancy death rates went down even in the last 100/200 years

Carolyn Tallen No need to shout

Out-of-Africa. You can not use today's map to talk about mankind during the last Ice age. There was NO water between Africa and the Middle East this was one land mass.

Hi chris. As you know when you become adult you stop believing in myths. You were not believed when children got older.🤣😇🎅🎅🎅

Ya. Genetics is proving noah s flood n adam/eve theory finally.

According to evolution: Humans didn't evolve from modern apes. But, humans do share a common ancestor with modern apes. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed 5 to 8 million years ago. The reason apes are still around is because evolution doesn't require the elimination of previous stages, and ancestral animals continue to evolve in there environments (like chimpanzees). For example, current wolves and fish are different from those that existed in the past. Hope that helps.

All of his organizations information is here: creation.com/ His bio and more are here: creation.com/dr-robert-carter Creation Ministries International If you want a more updated video with similar information you can check this one out too: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndeodcJo1ZfHeXk.html Thank you for watching

Pangea

16:00

Someone posted a comment concerning "why", not on this matter but the responder in other words said his understanding , wisdom,, knowledge, God divinity is and will always be greater than ours. If we knew everything we would be equal to him but we're only human and everything is not for us to understand because he wants us to have faith in believe in him and his word and even concerning of the truth he said seek and you shall find.

"How did 2 penguins waddle and swim all the way from the south pole to the middle east...?" Nobody claims that they did. "What about kangaroos? How did they get from australia to the middle east..." Again, nobody claims that they did. If you want to critique an idea, it's best to actually understand it first.

Apparently, you are expected to believe the fantastical stories without question, as though you, like the biblical text, are from the Iron Age!!

Is there a good video that explains your perspective?

Though the biblical genealogies offer little help in establishing Adam’s creation date, three other biblical clues do. First, Genesis 10:25 states that the world was divided in the time of Peleg. Given the context of God scattering humanity over the whole face of Earth, this statement probably refers to the time when the Bering land bridge became the Bering Strait. Reliable carbon-14 dating places this event at 11,000 years ago. This date implies that the worldwide scattering of humanity must have predated 9000 BC and that Noah’s flood must have occurred before 9000 BC. The creation of Adam would have occurred much earlier yet.

Gestation being shorter..how ? What organ /part of the body can reduce that ? Cell division takes time..growth takes time.. 38 weeks What do you propose could change that ? Wish is not fact.

It's a human thing, we try and use what we can to support our worldview. I can understand it, despite being a Christian I had been taught, and believed evolution. I now understand that evolution is true if you accept it as change over time as in dog breeds or bacteria but I also understand that it is impossible for anything to change into anything which isn't in its genetic material. Mutations do not provide that. The funny thing is that if an example of Darwinian evolution was found it would not disprove God. If God wanted to write into a cow's genetic code that it should turn into a whale at a certain time or in certain conditions then He could do so, just as easily as he wrote the code that makes a caterpillar turn into a butterfly.

No. Science isn't used to dis-prove God and there is no evidence of any kind that it is. Science constantly challenges theories, laws, and hypotheses. No matter the challenges to accepted theories and laws, making the leap to the supernatural has zero evidence or scientific merit. There is nothing to test so there is no factual information to support your claim. You can believe whatever you like but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

@@lrvogt1257 The word science comes from the Greek word for knowledge, so yes, human knowledge is growing with time. Though humanity is easily kept in the dark. The Romans invented benefit payments. They understood that if you kept a population fed and entertained they would not cause trouble, be easy to control. They provided chariot racing and gladiator sports. We do the same today with TV and movies. I know it is a waste of time quoting the Bible to someone who doesn't believe the Bible but if you read 1 Corinthians chapter 2. Verses 9 to 16 it will explain why you see no evidence. You can search it on line if you have no Bible.

@@jt2097 : Well, you're right not to quote the Bible as it's circular reasoning to say that the Bible proves that the Bible is true. We can only know what is factual with the scientific method. There is no possible test for the supernatural. Anything is possibly true but the supernatural is so lacking in evidence and therefore so unlikely that it should not be assumed to be true until someone can actually verify it. It certainly will not provide any useful factual information from which we can learn anything about the natural world so it's not a scientific study.

@@lrvogt1257 Do you believe in the Oort cloud? Because without it's existence it would indicate that the Solar system is less than 10,000 years old. If you do believe it exists I'd like you to provide scientific proof of its existence.

Not true the earth is only 6000 years old now your a DR you should know this.Carbon dating does not work

@@frankwoodward9914 I know this of course Frank, but Im interested to know how young earth proponents support their 6,000 year old beliefs in the light of the overwhelming Göbekli Tepi evidence. It will be interesting to see if they reply. Why do you say carbon dateing does to work? Of course it does if it is done correctly.

@@Campbellteaching carbon 14 only lasts for 100000 years

Maybe it is of the ‘pre-flood’ world? The flood buried it and with it all the skills that built it. Then, us humans, started over .....

Carbon dating is inaccurate due to the flood itself. The 12,000 uears is no longer a valuable time frame. Take it down by 6,000 and check your research to that time frame. You'll see that it is more valid.

Adam was almost 1000 years when he died, but that's from the time of expulsion from the Garden, he was in the Garden for thousands of years, but his age and time starts when he sins

@@charleneboren5255 your delusional

No it’s called fantasy imbecile

@@Stuartharrod1 Fantasy is believing that you are related to apes.

Not a single skeleton has been found of humans living older that 100.... no facts, no evidence.

Well, we hear about it all the time. Diabetes, downs, cancer, albinism, sickle cell... take your pick.

That’s called sin

You fucking sad bastards 😂😂you’re looking for something that ain’t there you imbeciles. Start living your life! You are just a sack of shit like every other human being! Yes a sack of shit!!

funny how we see no human inside a T-rex stomach

🤦🏻‍♂️ you have a great imagination sir 😂

Standard henhouse hit squad

Even cheated on Adam with the beastly Neanderthals we still have those genes he thinks incest is ok.

This guy is a mutant

That makes no sense.... Go back to sleep....

@@Is..4110 . 62 People would seem to disagree with U .

@Matt G . The claim backed up with absolutely no extra biblical evidence whatsoever .

Lol :p Same story is there in Indian Mythology. But only few thousand years older than Noah. :). I wonder why religious people lie much.

@@yashodamoily16 . Believers in bronze age superstitions actually don't know when they lie .

@Ethan Weeter . The Noah flood story is ridiculous ! No scientific way the fictional Ark could possibly have survived, period

What about Adam, the first gardener!?

You do that first

@@TheTheotherfoot No, the question was posed to someone who (clearly) has ZERO understanding of genetics (though, apparently, marine biology and genetics are... the same?)

Rhesus/RH+ blood contains a protein also found on the blood cells of the Rhesus monkey. Rh- does not have this protein. It has been assumed that given the numbers that Rh- is the mutation. But the origin of or even which Rh+ or Rh- is the mutation, is not known.

His PhD is in marine biology, not genetics.

@@DanielBrownsan i'm a physicist, 2d animator, 3d animator, writer and music composer with an advanced diploma in software engineering. whats your point?

@@blyrax That means you are no more qualified to make conclusions on the part of genetics as he is.

It’s nonsense gibberish delusional idiots

Your delusional to even entertain such gibberish

@Make Me Believe could you provide a link for me? I believe the bible and enjoy watching debates. Please no bill Nye.

There’s really no debating facts. He explained what evolutionist think happened. You cannot get around the truth. Shake it up, flip it around, and butt your head against a wall. God created what you see. That’s a fact. You may not like it. You would be just like me 20 years ago. I enjoyed sinning. I loved drinking, drugs, women, and all the rest. However, none of those things filled my soul. I was left empty. Boris Becker, famous German tennis player, won Wimbledon, and had fame and fortune. He reached the pinnacle of his profession. When he got there, he became despondent. He asked himself, “Is this it?” He almost committed suicide, because he felt like he had no other purpose. We all have a God shaped hole in us. It can only be filled by Him. You will never feel satisfied by what the world offers you. Denying truth doesn’t make it untrue.

It is almost always a waste of time trying to to debate or convince the die hard atheist/evolutionist . They insist you "prove" the Bible and creationism. Even though their theories have no basis in proof according to the principles and procedures of true scientific theory then models then discovery then proof, that sort of thing. You can present them with indisputable facts like the statistical impossibility of origin of life and principles of the laws of entropy but that does not matter to them. They will come up with "well such and such a person has a theory how this or that may have happened" all of which is of course just wild speculation. They try to impress and overwhelm you on how smart ,educated and how many degrees they have and when all else fails mock you and make jokes about you because they can't really give you an honest response that will work for their side. The bottom lines is they want to be their own "God's", and for them to admit that there is a creator would mean that they are accountable to Him. That is the one thing they will never do unless there is a true change in their hearts.

@@johnstudd4245 Wonderful selection of ambit claims based on assumptions.

Just did that. Feel free to discuss my comment.

Indeed, dickheads like him are hard to come by.

TwoWardrobes Wardrobes Woah! Thats really uncalled for. Being rude isn’t helpful and certainly won’t help you win any arguments.

Hahaha was it?

He's probably referring to a superficial study of how the genetics fit with the biblical account.

@@PJRayment I don't doubt it. Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for. Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition. So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account? Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?

@@peterleadley "I don't doubt it." In which case your original claim is shown to be baseless. "Sounds like the sort of thing he'd look long and hard for." Who? The host? "Denying scholarship is the mark of a conspiracy theorist, this old boy fits right in with the definition." What scholarship is he denying? And is it a case of denying scholarship, or rejecting the philosophical underpinning of the naturalistic view? "So you think there is a possibility that genetics fit the Biblical account?" Given that this video shows that it fits, then obviously yes. "Correct me if I am wrong, but did you not say you were a 'supernaturalist' and not a believer in 'naturalism'? Or I am confusing the issue?" You're confusing the issue. I believe that God exists, created the world, and created the laws of physics under which his creation operates. So it _operates_ according to natural laws, but had a supernatural origin. When a biblical creationist looks at the evidence, he can consider whether or not something came about naturally or supernaturally. A naturalistic view rejects supernatural explanations, and will consider only natural explanations.

🤺☦🇷🇺It's very easy job for you, western saтапs, to attack those Protestant heathens and Zionists, who twist and interpret the Bible like 4 year olds, and can't give the true answers for you, doesn't it? But you could never win against us, true Christians, Muslims and Jews. We appreciate all the genetical work and data, only not your funny evolutionist interpretation of the genetical data. Non of you wiseguys can win an argument against me - I will school your weak a$$ and humiliaтe you😼

@clifton gaither None of them can provide any form of evidence. Just wild arse claims and baseless assertions with no substance. There only go to card they have is " because I feel that he exists", which is not proof.

Iván GP ‘spiritual’? I think you’ll have to help me with that one.

Uummmm, nope. I've never seen a spiritual. It's not part of MY body.

What?😂😂

Which God, 3000 of them out there, at least

If you look at it like 90 years old at death instead of 900 He was in his prime through his 60’s or 600’s so Eve was still fertile at 45 or at 450 years.

If Adam and Eve are mother and father to all people then all people are related. Incest has been happening from the beginning. The incest between close family members is taboo. All other incestuous relationships are not,

Stephen Faust there is a more recent video he did with Origins that did cover incestuous marriages.

@@krakoosh1 And the title of this video is? First off. The Bible, save for some valid archeological information, scattered history like the original Hebrews were the Sahir', and a wonderful philosophy pertaining to how others should be treated that apparently died with Jesus, is a collection of fairy tales. Though they are between the same covers, the Old differs substantially from the New. All religions are created by different cultures. They do not represent reality. No where on earth is there evidence for a global flood and anyone familiar with genetics knows that whole sale incest would destroy a population. And what of the animal life aboard the ark ? Incest would destroy them too. Anyone that says differently is twisting scientific fact to sell books and DVDs to uneducated folks.

No proof of evolution, evidence is the opposite: 1) Cambrian explosion: All body plans appear at same time, early in Cambrian explosion. Eyes and other complex features all appear at once in Cambrian explosion. Fossil record is firm. 2) Avalon explosion single cells to complex life all at once. Fossil record is firm. 3) Lack of transitional fossils for most of life forms. Animals appear remain unchanged and most go extinct. The past predictions that new fossils finds would fill in the gap in the transitional fossils as not come true. There are “missing links” for most species. 4) Living fossils: Horseshoe crab, Nautilidae, Australian lungfish, nurse shark and many more. Animals appear, remain unchanged for long time spans. 5) Convergent evolution: Many complex features appear in unrelated animals and plants, too many to be evolution. Look at Chameleon and Sand Lance fish, same eyes (independent eye movements and special focusing lenses) and a darting tongue. The list is very long of convergent evolution, too long. 6) 6) Studies have shown mutations are only beneficial for species that have a very large population size, like bacteria. For all other animals mutations drives the species towards extinction. So mutations do not produce new and complex features, like eyes. When animals are stressed and have a small population size, we protect then, as they do not change. Mutations occur when DNA is damaged and left unrepaired. The ratio of negative to beneficial mutations in anything larger than an ant is harmful to the life form. 7) Natural selection can change an animal’s color and other small changes, but has been shown to have limits. Also, it has been shown that once the pressure that forces the change is gone, the animal will go back to its original state, changes are not permanent! Finch beak evolution, shown as proof, always fails to note the finch does not keep the large beak. As the food that forced the large beak is gone, the beak returns to its original size. 8) Origins of life: There was no primordial soup. There was no time for natural origins, as soon as the Earth cooled there was life. The first life forms were not “simple” as predicted. Cyanobacterium is very complex. There was not one simple early life form, there was a complete ecosystem with sulfate-reducing microorganisms also shows up early in the record, also a very complex life form. 9) Some clades are very diverse and some unusually sparse, evolution should work everywhere the same. 10) The recovery after mass extinctions is very quick, too quick for evolution. Permian-triassic Extinction: 90 percent to 95 extinction rate. Yet, life recovered in just thousands of years. Triassic-jurassic Extinction: Triassic dinosaurs gone and in just thousands of years all new Jurassic dinosaurs. Cretaceous-tertiary Extinction: Mass extinction, all dinosaurs are gone, as is most life forms, yet there are all new life forms in just thousands of years. 11) Breeding for dogs and horses for thousands of years. Change comes at a heavy cost, shorter life span and poor health. 12) DNA testing of close animals has shown they are not related. The two river dolphins and ocean dolphins are not related. The two panda bears are not related and the list can go on and on. 13) The proof of evolution is mostly: Animal A looks like animal B, so animal B must have come from animal A, how childish if you can not show how it happened. 14) Common Ancestry problem. Animals that have a recent common ancestor are too different. A donkey is very close in ancestry to the horse and zebra. So close that they may breed producing mules and zonkeys. Yet the donkey, horse and zebra are very different, too different. The donkey is very cautious and departs from danger, they can not be used in a battle. The horse willingly will go into battle, some like the danger. The Donkey and the horse are easily tamed and once tame will remain tame. Zebra are difficult to tame and difficult to remain tame. Other sample of this problem can be found in nature. 15) “Evolution Junk”, those that only believe in evolution have put on blinders and have made gross errors in the past about designs in nature. The theory is evolution is a series of random mutations, thus residual vestige of random mutations will be found in nature. In this thinking many scientists overlooked designs in life. Only later to be shown that what they called junk, was in fact a good design. Examples of this are many: Tonsils, Appendix, Panda's thumb, Whale hips (still taught as vestige, but this is wrong), Junk DNA, Humpback Whales fins, and more. There are neutral mutations, like some humans have three or one kidney, but these are not residual vestige or a case for design as they are rare. 16) Human exceptionalism: Charles Darwin wrote and many scientists followed this thinking: Animals that most look like us will most closely match our cognitive capabilities. After study and research, the animals that has the closest cognitive capabilities to humans are crows, ravens and New Caledonian Crow. The New Caledonian Crow can: Make fish hooks, teach others how to make fish hooks. Crows and ravens (same family) are the only animals to be able to solve multi step problems and make tools to solve these problems. MRI scans have shown crow and raven brains are the closest brain to humans. Yet Human exceptionalism has shown are not just a higher animal. Humans different much from animals. Humans are the only one to be active in: art, musical, jewelry, use symbolism, active religion, written languages, mathematics, have moral dilemmas and much more. Many of these appeared as soon as humans appear. Neanderthal has few of these abilities and is too different from Humans. Near the end Neanderthals lived at the same time as Humans. Neanderthals had no tear ducts, very large sinuses, large barrel shaped chest, short arms, heavy bones, different braincase, different ear bones, and more. There is no “missing link” to humans from bipedal primates. The large brain evolution hypothesis has been falsified after the discovery of early hominin with larger brains than later hominin fossils.

Or they have come to terms with their own mortality. These monotheistic religions push the notion of an afterlife to appeal to our genetically wired desire not to die. Your fear of death is driving you to believe this bullshit. Come to terms with it, embrace the fragility and fleeting nature of life. You will be a lot happier.

@@mickhealy572 "evolution has been proved true beyond doubt" As an agent of change, correct. As the origin of life, incorrect. No one cares that Evolution is true in so far as it explains how some life has changed over a period of time.

@@mickhealy572 My point is rather obvious, Evolution doesn't propose an explanation for the origin of life and so is irrelevant in the discussion. What's funny, in an ironic way, is that you say "I never claimed it was the origin of life" which may very well be true, but many could make a case against you being truthful given the way you interjected with your first inkstain comment to Mattman. However, you then go on to ask me if I think that Evolution has any bearing on the debate between Creationism and Science, followed by an ad hominem. Interesting, and, there seems to be an inconsistency in your thinking... Since Creationism is an assertion about the origin of life (a Creator created everything), why do you think there is a conflict with Science? Unless, in your mind Evolution *does* provide a counter theory to the origin of life, why would you bring it up in a discussion about the origin of life? It seems obvious to me, in your followup comments to Mattman and me, you somehow think Creationism is false, yet you have no proof that your position is true. Evolution is certainly not the proof you are in need of.

Once death is near then humans give authority to God

No, there is solar radiation and from rocks.

What an abysmal analogy. God is a failed hypothesis that adds nothing to the global body of knowledge we have seen and observed. It's just a fable from a time when we didn't know where the sun went at night.

​@@jdbjdbjdbjdbWell, that's one opinion. Good luck with that.

Yup Crocodillians and Turtles have been around for a while too. Genesis is fantasy nonsense.

I know of no good evidence to support that.

Evolutionary biology and materialism are two different things. One needs to be in denial to deny evolution, which has been observed, and is therefore an indisputable fact, just like 'the Earth is not flat' is an indisputable fact.

@@doctorwebman I am trying to figure out if some people try to be misleading intentionally, or just out of ignorance... Evolution, as an agent of change, is indeed proven. Evolution, as an explanation for the origin of life, is NOT proven. Good day and God bless!

@@michaelwill7811 Evolution is not a theory about the origin of life, nor is it meant to be. It is only meant to explain the origin of the diversity of species. Evolution has been observed in controlled and uncontrolled conditions in the lab and field, including speciation, and is therefore a fact.

@@doctorwebman And yet many non-believers trot it out on a regular basis as the "Christianity-busting" proof that us Christians are wrong. I apologize if they don't understand what Evolution is, really, I do...

@@michaelwill7811 Evolution only shows that Genesis is wrong about Adam and Eve, and about each species being specially created.

AMEN!

We are to have the Mind of Christ and then we can understand the Divine thoughts of God. Then we can be of one mind and one accord.

So, I should just accept without question? Fair enough. Thing is though, there are at least 2700 belief systems, and they all ask me to do the same. How can I know you are right? ( “because the Bible says so” isn’t an answer) .

@@stevieh9860 The Holy Spirit of God is to be our Teacher, our Guide, our Helper and our Instructor. So we do not need man to teach us anything. We are living stones in the temple. So there is going to be some variation. Still God fits us all together. In our human body we have different parts. We have hands, we have feet, we have a kidney and a liver. Yet all the parts are needed even if they seem very different from each other.

Absolutely not. Try searching for the answer in God's word. Don't search to disprove though search with humility and willingness to be taught.

It's too bad he doesn't seem to live inside the hearts of all the starving, sick, dying children and people around the world.

No need for you to watch crap like this on the internet then,if you’re going to believe the same shit regardless.

He lives in all that will receive him. You see the starvation and the sickness and the poverty and what do you do about it? You show your hatred towards God by attacking his word you commit every sin which he warns you would lead you to hell. And then you take up a railing accusation against God, who made you. You are self righteous and pathetic. You’re probably in favor of abortion, which is murdering children. When’s the last time you’ve done anything for anyone other than yourself? Think about this I don’t know what’s coming for you on judgment day, but I’m guessing it’s going to be along these lines. They what measure you judge, and she’ll be judged under you. Go accuse GOD of all the starvation and suffering in the world, it is very easily proven that most of it is the result of mankind‘s disobedience to biblical principles on one hand and mankind’s willingness, and even enthusiasm to persecute his neighbor for small gaiins. The problem for Christendom over the last 150 years as we’ve been willing to suffer fools and grown ass children like yourself. You are at the point of open mockery. You have been wrong about everything and GOD mocks to your face but you’re too stupid to see it. You’re a kind will say that the world is overpopulated and we will be starving by the 90s and then in the 90s, and all the kids are obese. You cried about global cooling in the 70s but things warmed up and now you cry about global warming, but things cool down so now you call a climate change. You can’t even admit there’s two genders anymore because you’re a degenerate fool who has been turned over to delusion, and he chose your delusions to mock you before those who are willing to listen to the voice of God. Many will wake up because your foolishness will be exposed. I pray that both the science and the archaeology bring forth multitudes of examples against your foolish conjecture, and lies against your creator, who you hate because you are evil. And my prayers will be answered. You will die mocked and defeated. You will no longer even care about your own reputation or intellectual standing as you are perplexed with how badly your wife has gone and then behold, your old and frail frame broken and diseased, will tremble with thoughts of your coming damnation. Laugh now you shall week later. This is your time. enjoy every moment Hell Eternal is your portion, accept you repent. There is no counsel against the Lord. Our God is not mocked, but long-suffering, so that even a wretched fool, like you might come to repentance, but at the end, he is not mocked he will reap that what you sow either by his will to eternal life in the saving of your soul, or to your will which is contrary to your on welfare unto eternal damnation(prepared not for mankind, but for the angels who rebelled against him who is chattel you are in Adam, if you are not redeemed in Christ unto eternal life. The choice is yours ,I hope against hope that you would throw off your self hatred and turn to God while there is time. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. Your spiritual condition is worse than any bigger or starving child among the heathen, and he died to save you, and feed you with the bread of life, if you only receive it.

​@@alicenorman5236We all have the opportunity to feed and protect those children, stop wars and take care of our fellow man in need

@BMore so the bible is the bar that science has to reach. The bible is full of stories. Science deals with facts not your feelings. Use science to prove fairies dont exist then?

@BMore 😁

BMore Archeology proves the Bible true with every new discovery.

@@whiteclifffl and now prove your assertion.

Maybe you should write this post on a stone tablet, not an Apple tablet

The Flood was about 50,000 BC.

Hi. I'm open to persuasion either way but if not evolution how was life created? Am I to believe,as this documentary says. God mad man from dust. I'm not even going down the road of which god. There are many many myths on creation. How do you know you have chosen the correct one. Are you advocating magic? Calculate that's

@@dacman53265 well contemplate this.......is man made of "dust"? Is the "order" of the bibles explanation of creation correct? I've started salt water aquariums and I see a direct correlation. A simple explaination for people at that time but accurate non the less. If you want to dismiss the simple explanation of the incredible complexity of the origins of life that the bible recounts, go ahead. I can completely understand. However, I am able to conceive of life forms that are different/superior to ours, things seen and unseen. Most people believe in some form of this. The concept of a designer/creater/architect is completely acceptable to me, even reasonable as nothing worthwhile has ever happened accidentally, hence the word "accident". Not a very good word to describe something as incomprehensibly complicated as life. Can I explain /understand every detail? No. But I do know this, male and female mammals are different creatures and it takes one of each to "procreate" life, as we know it. The possibility of these two life forms "evolving" together over millions or billions of yrs is incalculable. Not enough 0s in the knowen or unknown universe.

Keri Williams Hi. It's ok to say everything you see has to be designed. You can look at buildings, paintings,cars etc. You can trace these back to the designer and the manufacturer. It's a big leap to be able to do that with creation. You must have heard the saying extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't just say because I don't believe evolution ,it makes more sense that a god did it. That's called the god of the gaps. If the sun wasn't the perfect distance away from the earth and the moon wasn't in the perfect position to the earth we wouldn't exist doesn't mean it's not possible that it just happened bearing in mind there are trillions upon trillions of planets and stars ✨. That to me is more possible than a supernatural being had control and made it the way it is. Keri, are you also a young earther? You say that nothing happens on its own but you are accepting a god producing everything from nothing.

@@dacman53265 thanks for your opinion/view. Your right.

@@dacman53265 I see...Any, anything made man and other lifeforms, except an all powerful being that we are accountable to.

Genesis 6:1 to 10 For your answer

Just another idiot... great evidence ignorer.

Dean Wilson Bahahaha

I call them you tube profit prophets

50 yrs..seriously! We have a leap year and the Jewish calendar is not 365 days

430 years in Canaan and Egypt 215 in each. enslaved in Egypt for no longer than 140 years

@Christopher Tracy • I got ahold of a Septuagint and Josephus book of Genesis 11th chapter. You are right. I need prayer and encouragement because this is the Bible belt and I wanted to make this masoretic text come under the scrutiny we as Bible believers owe the word of God! We got enough light of Egyptian history to see that the KJV is out of sync with history.

Ralph Foster I’d advise you to not do so. This was a person, already convinced of something but needing to ‘prove’ it, who was simply shoehorning the present to fit the past. That’s not how Science works!

😂

Those that study and research have facts and truth. Try yours, the languge, Latin aka LADINOES, ROME, PORTUGLE, SPAIN. THOSE ARE CLUES TO SPAIN-ISH and HEBREW. When we talk about Hebrew to include the word LADINOES, is to refer only to the BLACK SPEAKING LADINOES, you could not be mixed and be called Ladino.

Here is the phrase that makes me laugh more than anything. The atheist swears( to whom I wonder) that creation can't make any predictions... then you see a video like this. (:^D) The bible was making scientific predictions that are shown to be true today , long before science as we know it today was even a thing.

@@THUTH-ix3tt Might want to take your own advice.

Wm tyndale your so correct something like 10 to the trillionth power

@@THUTH-ix3tt Oh don't worry. You will certainly meet Him. Mark the date.

@@THUTH-ix3tt he's all around you

The Bible says that a day is as a thousand years..

@@iamjustsaying4787 You don't honestly believe that do you

My husband and I were just talking about this, this past weekend. I asked the same question. If time really isn’t in existence, how long was 1 day to God…

Genesis 1 the verses 5, 8, 13 and a few more, tell us that they were days with an evening and a morning, so these were ordinary 24 hour days. Genesis 5:5 tells us Adam died at the age of 930 years, so If the creation days were long periods of 1000 years or more, Adam would not even have made it to the end of the 6th day when he was created. (and probably wouldn't have met Eve either)

The earth is not 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?

Neanderthals would have been a group/variety of post-flood humans. What post-flood nephilim?

@Kit Kefner "Anak, Goliath, King Of etc were Nephilim" The Bible doesn't say that. The only reference to post-flood Nephilim (which does align them with Anak, but not Goliath nor Og), was in the _false_ report of the spies that went into Canaan. And the accounts of the Israelites meeting other peoples in Canaan (including Goliath, etc.) makes no reference to nephilim. "The biblical flood was 5,000 bc Neanderthals have been around for 450,000 years." This is a classic case of comparing chalk and cheese. The flood was around 2350 BC (not 5000 BC) _according to the biblical dating,_ while Neanderthals were around much earlier _according to secular dating._ You're basically saying that the biblical account doesn't fit with the secular account. Duh! That's because they are competing accounts!

Well said

Really? How?

@@maxmac7845 It is a fallacy that is how.

@@andrewarmstrong7310 ah

So true...modern scientists state it takes more faith to not believe in a divine creator than to believe in God based on facts and science.

It was north east africa; the horn. But still; Africa.

A tiny bit of faith in the right thing is worth alot more than absolute faith in the wrong thing.

Having faith is nothing to brag about. Faith requires the purposeful suspension of reason. That's not a good way of deducing the truth.

Max Mac How right you are.

@@maxmac7845 Faith is the substance of all things hoped for. Meaning all men have faith. But what do you know of reason? Your belief system is based off what a group of people believe just as Ann Brown's is. You simply disagree. But don't get confused you don't have proof in your belief either.

@@alamotte2005 You're conflating faith with trust. They are two entirely separate things. Trust is real world evidence based and, well, they don't call it "blind faith" for nothing. I care about what is actually true. Do you?

,have you counted each one yourself? No . Information provided by , the tellievison. If it has " so what ! Where is it written that if this many people are alive .this many must DIE .AND BILL XXXXX WILL JUDGE WHO LIVES WHO DIES ..XXXX THAT

@@onewordhereonewordthere6975 wow you nailed it. No I havent counted all the people in the world myself. So my claim that the population of the world has more than doubled since I was born (1962) is wrong. Fantasy.

Read ‘God’ by Alexandra Waugh! Brilliant! And comical in parts! Especially John’s account of Sophia!

There is nothing mythical about it, nor any fables within it either. In fact, it’s the real deal, replete with hidden messages that no other religious book contains.

Read Alexander waugh’s book God! Was a Christian all my life until I read the above! He explains every contradiction, every false shit and how inaccurate the whole of the bible is. An absolute page turner! I’m possible to argue against!

Robert Dunn can you flesh out your claims for me? I’m especially interested in ‘hidden messages’ if that helps you at all. As for ‘nothing mythical’ I suspect you have not the slightest knowledge of the countless legends and stories from other cultures and civilisations that predate the Bible and which can be found in an almost exact form within the Old Testament writings. I suspect you need to get out more.

JC Kensway Agree with you 100%. Read Alexandra Waugh’s ‘God’ Brilliant👌

Just remember it's not, a part of the Bible it's not, inspired it's just a cool ancient Hebrew history book.

@@justchilling704 under what authority did the people who authorized the books of the bible have? That's right, NONE, they were not commanded or inspired to make those decisions, fact.

@@-kepha8828 God's authority is the only that matters and since the Bible is true I'd recommend you not question God.

@@justchilling704 the bible is composed of books that man chose to incorporate, not God. God never created a "book" containing all of his writings. Man took it upon himself to do so, and in doing so, they eliminated many books of God that they didnt agree with. That's anti christ

@@justchilling704 How could u possibly know whether it was inspired? Different churches around the world have always held different sets of books to be "The Bible". Who ate you to say which actually count and which don't? Just because of the specific set of books that YOU happen to have grown up with? You are but one person. With a personal preference, based on custom. "The Bible" (the one I've heard of) warns against customs.

Very good question!! I've been tossing that around for awhile now, wondering if there are still distinctive behavioral traits that might be associated with it.

@SAP 23 Thank you for that very informative, long-winded explanation. It explains what Paul was going through at Romans 7:14-25, and what I, and probably most self-examining persons, have to be constantly reminded, the struggle that living in the flesh is in conflict with living in the spirit. I thank Jesus every day for helping me hold the line and "rescuing me from the body of death". Thank you again. You made sense.

Thank you both. I have a feeling I would very much enjoy discussing this topic and many others, further with either of you.

"biblical account"? The "sons of God" that this passage tells about are not angels, but the descendants of Seth who served God. The "sons of man" were the Descendants of Cain who did not. Angels were created to be in God's service. They do not procreate, Jesus said. Math. 22 23:31