Orthodox Ecclesiology and What that Means for East/West Relations (w/ Fr. Laurent Cleenewerck)

  Рет қаралды 16,199

Gospel Simplicity

Gospel Simplicity

3 жыл бұрын

This video is sponsored by Faithful Counseling. For 10% off your first month, use the link, www.faithfulcounseling.com/gos...
What is Orthodox Ecclesiology? For outsiders, it may seem that the Orthodox Church is structured the same way as the Catholic Church, just without a pope. However, in this video, Fr. Laurent Cleenewerck, author of His Broken Body, walks us through the Eucharistic Ecclesiology of the Orthodox Church. He contrasts this with the more institutional model of the Catholic Church, as well as exploring what this means for ecumenical work between Catholics and Orthodox. It's a fascinating conversation, and we talk about topics like what it would take for Catholics and Orthodox to reunite and whether or not the Orthodox need a pope for their church structure to work. If your interested in Orthodoxy, ecumenism, or ecclesiology in general, I think you'll really enjoy this.
Fr. Laurent's book: amzn.to/3vPeZA8
Your One-Stop Shop: www.gospelsimplicity.com
Support Gospel Simplicity:
Patreon: / gospelsimplicity​
Merch: gospelsimplicity.creator-spri...
Follow Gospel Simplicity on Social Media:
Facebook: / gospelsimplicity​
Instagram: / gospelsimpli...​
Twitter: / gsplsimplicity​
About Gospel Simplicity:
Gospel Simplicity began as a KZfaq channel in a Moody Bible Institute dorm. It was born out of the central conviction that the gospel is really good news, and I wanted to share that with as many people as possible. The channel has grown and changed over time, but that central conviction has never changed. Today, we make content around biblical and theological topics, often interacting with people from across the Christian tradition with the hope of seeking greater unity and introducing people to the beautiful simplicity and transformative power of the gospel, the good news about Jesus.
About the host:
Hey! My name is Austin, and I'm a 22 year old guy who’s passionate about the beautiful simplicity and transformative power of the gospel. I believe that the gospel, the good news about Jesus, is really good news, and I’m out to explore, unpack, and share that good news with as many people as possible. I'm a full blown Bible and Church History nerd that loves getting to dialogue with others about this, learning as much as I can, and then teaching whatever I can. I grew up around Frederick, MD where I eventually ended up working my first job at a church. They made the mistake of letting me try my hand at teaching, and instantly I fell in love. That set me on a path for further education, and I'm currently a student at Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, IL, studying theology. On any given day you can find me with my nose in a book or a guitar in my hands. Want to get to know me more? Follow me and say hi on Instagram at: @austin.suggs
Send Me Books or Other Things if You’d like:
Austin Suggs
820 N. La Salle Dr.
CPO 123
Chicago, IL 60610
About our sponsor:
KINDRED exists to encourage more acts of faith. We believe this begins with reclaiming sacred time for God in our daily life. KINDRED Bibles are a beautiful presentation of the biblical books. Sacred scripture is preserved and composed in an approachable and engaging format to support daily prayer, reflection and discernment. Whether you are discovering scripture for the first time or rediscovering it for the 100th time, the time spent with God is time well spent. We invite you to encounter the Bible in a reflective new way. We invite you to experience The Word renewed.
Use promo code GOSPEL10 for 10% off your KINDRED order at: www.kindredapostle.com/
Watch my review of KINDRED’s The Gospel According to Mark at: bit.ly/3rbbhP8
Video Stuff:
Camera: Sony a6300
Lens: Sigma 16mm F1.4 amzn.to/2MjssPB
Edited in FCPX
Music:
Bowmans Root - Isaac Joel
*Links in the description may include affiliate links in which I receive a small commission of any purchases you make using that link.

Пікірлер: 884
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
This video is sponsored by Faithful Counseling. For 10% off your first month, use the link, www.faithfulcounseling.com/gospelsimplicity. If you're struggling with your mental health, be sure to check out Faithful Counseling to get the help you need.
@marcuswilliams7448
@marcuswilliams7448 3 жыл бұрын
Premiers the 19th, but watching it now....
@helenoce5007
@helenoce5007 3 жыл бұрын
I know who is struggling, the whole world that Jesus came to save, to many liers have confused many souls, The Bible was made by the Church of Christ 2000. Years ago He inspired his with his Holy Spirit For the (whole )who believe is one body. If you don't understand me , I see why the word if the Lord is being used according to the minds that are probably possessed y other spirits 1Timoty4:1- Matthew 24::11-14, 24-25. To many are dieing walking in darkness. Jesus is betrayed as much as before, we are so ungrateful I guess whatever I say you would not see or understand. Do not harden your hearts. May God have mercy James4:4,5.* Many are making books, churches, making much many with the WORD for money becoming pastors who are not appointed by God robbing people demanding to pay the tenth. That's not stealing with a lie? Just this question for you in the new testament, where did Jesus command that? In the past was only for the priest to collect for the widows and orfans. what spirit rules that? His word is true, those who stumbled on the rock! , are wrong. This is true Who does in reality need counseling?? I say this to you that might come to hear or understand, not with hate or offense🙆❤
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@Robert Vann God the Son, the Son of God the Father is general Christian belief. All Christians believe it.
@OrthodoxExperience
@OrthodoxExperience 3 жыл бұрын
Good interview. I would like to emphasize that communion on Orthodoxy is not just solely based on a shared spiritual experience but also firmly grounded on "complete" agreement on dogmatic faith.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@matthewgroh8797
@matthewgroh8797 Жыл бұрын
​@@NSOcarth Yes, that would be the Nicene Creed (minus Philioque) of course. All later additions would have to be left behind.
@matthewgroh8797
@matthewgroh8797 Жыл бұрын
@@NSOcarth No, I'm just going on the most logical pre-schism point based on your description. I'm glad it's aligned with Pope Benedict's suggestion.
@gwendolynnorton6329
@gwendolynnorton6329 3 жыл бұрын
Wow! I am Catholic, I am loving this guy. I grew up in Alaska where the Russian Orthodox Church is hugely prominent historically and still today in every day life in many communities. It was always a positive influence for me.
@johns.9659
@johns.9659 3 жыл бұрын
We can only hope in Christ this comes to be resolved
@johnanon9907
@johnanon9907 3 жыл бұрын
We all need to be humble and repent, especially me. Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on us.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Amen
@annacrowley7426
@annacrowley7426 2 жыл бұрын
And me.
@30JLETO
@30JLETO 3 жыл бұрын
As a Catholic, I identify so much with this orthodox priest and longing for reunion
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 3 жыл бұрын
"I’ve had people come to me who suggested: “All of us who believe in Christ should form one religion”. I said to them: Now what you’re telling me is to take gold and copper - gold of so many carats quality - which they [the Church Fathers] took so much trouble to purify, and then gather the metals and melt them into one mass. Is it right to mix them together again?" - St. Paisios the Athonite
@DaFooling
@DaFooling 3 жыл бұрын
Love Saint Paisios
@WilliamMoses355
@WilliamMoses355 2 жыл бұрын
Pure gold is too soft and not good for jewelry one intends to wear regularly. You need to mix in copper and other metals, or your wedding ring will get scuffed and dented all the time. I don't know whether Saint Paisios was right or wrong about the church, but he was wrong about gold.
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 2 жыл бұрын
@@WilliamMoses355 the analogy is not about wearing jewelry, but about the purity of the elements.
@fatherbarnabaspowell803
@fatherbarnabaspowell803 3 жыл бұрын
This is wonderful. Thanks Austin. As to Kyiv, I bet you're not surprised to hear that Constantinople has a nuanced narrative concerning this current crisis. I am convinced that God, in His love for us, grants us the freedom to enter into these conflicts to call us to humility and repentance. The gift of unity flows to the humble and the penitent. All external divisions reduce to the reality of our own divided hearts. The internal brokenness of our own lives always manifests themselves in the external divisions that rightly call us to repentance!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Hello Fr. Barnabas! I've enjoyed some of your videos. I'm glad to hear that you appreciated Fr. Cleenewerck's thoughts here. I love what you have to say here about the relationship between internal brokenness and external division. That's a great insight
@mikklecash6046
@mikklecash6046 3 жыл бұрын
@OrthodoxyChloroQuine you've gotta stop sniffing the chloroform. You see demonic activity everywhere. "horrible fraud, waste and abuse" in medieval Europe ---no doubt you could find plenty, but you would also find it in the Eastern churches under the Emperors in Constantinople, and under the Tsars in Russia, and then of course under the Ottomans. Maybe the difference is that in the west there were always reform movements going on, from the monks at Cluny through St Francis and St Dominic through to the Jesuits and the Council of Trent. You don't understand the Second Vatican Council, nothing demonic about it, and it doesn't bear any similarity to the protestant reformation. Did you learn all your history from a single pamphlet?
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
@@mikklecash6046 the weaknesses in your argument is simply the Catholic view of an infallible papacy. The pope is suppose to protect the Church from error. There is no infallible bishop in the East. So, when you compare the failures in the East and West, I ask what has been the benefit of having an “infallible” pope?
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
@OrthodoxyChloroQuine and that was my point. I probably didn’t make it as clearly as I should have. I believe we are in agreement my friend.
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
@OrthodoxyChloroQuine Christ has risen!
@carlahmed5737
@carlahmed5737 3 жыл бұрын
". . .at least mourn the separation, that would be nice. . ." Amen to that. Also loved what Fr said regarding 'one loaf in the city'. Sending lots of love to Catholic brothers and sisters and truly mourning our separation. God bless you all.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I liked those points too!
@tonyjames9016
@tonyjames9016 3 жыл бұрын
I mourn it daily. God bless!
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
It's hard to mourn what happened so long ago.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@carlahmed5737 Please don't call me sister. To be fair, I don't see the point of mourning what Rome did to be cut off from the Katholikos Ekklesia and Protestants we never were united with. It is confusing to me.
@carlahmed5737
@carlahmed5737 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria It may well be that my perspective as a parent helps me to understand how we can mourn both the bad action itself and the ensuing effects. But if that isn't something you can relate to, perhaps just mourning the effects of schism is less confusing. Please excuse my clumsy and rushed attempt to answer your last sentence, about confusion. If you get time and inclination, would you also explain something for me? Why didn't you like me calling you "sister" ? Genuinely curious is all.
@bethanyann1060
@bethanyann1060 3 жыл бұрын
This is random but someone needs to tell Father Laurent that he MUST do audiobook recordings. I LOVE his voice!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Haha, now that you say that, I could see him being good at that!
@TyroneBeiron
@TyroneBeiron 3 жыл бұрын
Just keep replaying this post and add up to the sum number of views... 😂
@bethanyann1060
@bethanyann1060 3 жыл бұрын
@@TyroneBeiron lol
@richardlui5311
@richardlui5311 3 жыл бұрын
I have a feeling I’m really going to enjoy this one, thanks Austin!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I hope you do!
@traceyedson9652
@traceyedson9652 3 жыл бұрын
Again, an uplifting and edifying program. I appreciate how you try to use your interlocutors terms & vocabulary in order to experience his understanding and not just mentally understand it. It’s a humble approach, and a challenge to me personally in my life.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@BruvaLucius
@BruvaLucius 3 жыл бұрын
Fr Laurent reminds me of John Meyendorff in his outlook towards ecumenism, I do hope that my Catholic brothers and sisters can strive to unite once more and heal the body of Christ. Thanks so much for organising this!
@ephesiansbrowne5982
@ephesiansbrowne5982 3 жыл бұрын
I pray for this! I want to be in communion with my Orthodox brothers and sisters!
@Jy3pr6
@Jy3pr6 3 жыл бұрын
You can, by becoming Orthodox, dear brother Ephesians
@ephesiansbrowne5982
@ephesiansbrowne5982 3 жыл бұрын
@@Jy3pr6 I spent 2 years as an Orthodox catechumen. I know the drill.
@Jy3pr6
@Jy3pr6 3 жыл бұрын
@@ephesiansbrowne5982 Then you’re almost there brother!
@bonniejohnstone
@bonniejohnstone 3 жыл бұрын
Good job on a difficult topic. Not much discussion though about theological differences that are barriers to unity and I would like a follow-up on the filioque, adoration, apparitions, original sin, fasting, monastic rules, celibacy, divorce, wedding vows (Orthodox don’t have vows), determination of who is a qualified Saint, confession, modernism. All these have points of difference that can be very significant! I know... it’s a long list but the almost 30 years that I have been Orthodox (Protestant Convert) the more nuanced is differences in Catholic and Orthodox Theology. We Orthodox are afraid for sure of Rome swallowing us whole. It’s a fear that Rome would disrespect and try to I erase the suffering in the Middle East under the Ottoman’s... the communist massacre of tens of thousands of Orthodox Nun’s, Priests, Monks and Bishops (plus laypeople lost in gulag’s). Catholics have suffered too, but in the Middle East, Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox still suffer persecution and death. Walk into my convert parish in Colorado and there are 20-30 Greeks, Russians, Georgians that left communism or persecution. In my daughters parish it’s a diaspora of Palestinian Orthodox, Egyptians and Eritreans. This diaspora is fresh and makes dialogue difficult because feelings are still sensitive.
@david_porthouse
@david_porthouse Жыл бұрын
The Orthodox Church denies the sainthood of the Forty Martyrs of England and Wales as a consequence of them being filioquists. Online they are running a big industry bashing the Filioque.
@Polarbeardueck
@Polarbeardueck 3 жыл бұрын
I think this has been my favorite gospel simplicity discussion so far
@scipioafricanus2195
@scipioafricanus2195 3 жыл бұрын
Unity based on compromise is not unity. The Orthodox church would love for the Catholic church to come back into communion but not at the expense of the truth. That is why ecumenism does not work. Unless error is corrected or recanted there can be no communion. Im a recent convert to Orthodoxy, and this was an issue as a protestant that I at one point thought "whats the big deal?" But when it comes to Truth and preserving the faith, there can be no unity in error. I lament the schism which ultimately led to the reformation. I long for unity with everything within me, but not at the expense of the deposit of the Faith that has been handed down.
@scipioafricanus2195
@scipioafricanus2195 3 жыл бұрын
@@frcaseycole4135 you should be ashamed of yourself impersonating a priest. Do you think im a boomer and will fall for your scam? This is sick. And under the auspices of helping sick children
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
The reunification is happening now. Many faithful Christians are coming to the Orthodox Church. My ROCOR parish is primarily Catholic and Protestant converts, but it also includes cradle Orthodox from Russia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, and Greece.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
That's interesting to hear!
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity one of our assigned priest and his wife were Catholic, a subdeacon was a Baptist minister, and our deacon is Carpathian Russian Orthodox. It’s a wonderful little parish.
@yalechuk6714
@yalechuk6714 3 жыл бұрын
@@flisom It might be happening in the west but it isn't happening in the countries where orthodoxy holds sway . In fact in most of those countries the church is like piece of national art. In live in one of them so I have seen first hand. I guess with this phenomenon of Christians converting to Orthodoxy or Catholicism is the Western desire for the exotic and the poor state of the church in the West. My prayer is that this fire that has been kindled will flourish even unto the lands were orthodoxy holds sway and go beyond this shallow tribal doctrinal disagreements.
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
@@yalechuk6714 actually the “exotic” aspect of Orthodoxy is the largest hurtle to be overcome in the West. Most in the US see the Greek, Russian, etc. Orthodox Churches as ethnic Churches and never consider them as an option. Those who find their way to the Orthodox Church usually have traveled a long road to get there. I pray for the rebirth of faith in your country and all of Europe.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@yalechuk6714 I am Orthodox because I believe/know it is truth, not for any reasons you cited. There is no Western Church, it is Western Christianity.
@jessedutch3086
@jessedutch3086 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Austin for all your content! A fan from the Netherlands here!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@nromanov
@nromanov 3 жыл бұрын
Also a fan from the Netherlands (of Serbian descent) 😁
@ThatkidwithCP
@ThatkidwithCP 3 жыл бұрын
Fr. Laurent is active with Humboldt State University students (where I went to college, in northern California) when he invites Religious Studies majors to the Orthodox Church. We've also had him lecture as a guest. He's very intelligent and approachable and I was glad he is in our small community.
@Alexander-fr1kk
@Alexander-fr1kk 3 жыл бұрын
Love your channel and loved your interview with Keith yesterday
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Alexander-fr1kk
@Alexander-fr1kk 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity how can I donate to you so you can watch Fatima?
@Alexander-fr1kk
@Alexander-fr1kk 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity your site said it wasn’t accepting donations?… credit card anyway…
@BruvaLucius
@BruvaLucius 3 жыл бұрын
Fr Laurent seems to be one of the most honest speaking Orthodox I've heard from in a while, God willing we may learn from this man to be humble and honest regarding our dialogue with the Catholics. God bless.
@BruvaLucius
@BruvaLucius 3 жыл бұрын
I also appreciate the reference Father makes to Apostolic Cannon 34 which talks about the bishops in a region operating but only with the approval of the first among those bishops, and the same goes in reverse. I tend to think of the Papacy in a similar way, the Archbishop of the churches as the last court of appeal.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
Oh hey it's Luke from Facebook, didn't think I'd catch you here.
@BruvaLucius
@BruvaLucius 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria Sorry I'm not entirely sure who you are, forgive me if I do I'm horrendous with my memory or lack of it
@mikeoconnor4590
@mikeoconnor4590 3 жыл бұрын
When people think of “the Lord’s Prayer” they instinctively think of the “Our Father” - but the Lords actual prayer is “that they be one just as you and I are one” - so unity as father says is the desire or the mind of Christ. That being said - our Lord must have created a vehicle for this unity. Father gives us much food for thought - another great and thought provoking discussion Austin!
@stylianospallas490
@stylianospallas490 3 жыл бұрын
I am a Christian Orthodox (Greek orthodox) and I am in favor of a true, benevolent and honest dialogue with the Catholic Church - at the end of the day, we are sisters and brothers in Christ. Not only from a theological perspective - which of course is important- but also from a historical one, namely the consequences of the Sack of Constantinople in 1204, its collective trauma for the Greek speaking orthodox Christians and the efforts and steps for reconciliation (for instance the return of important relics and artifacts, stolen by the crusaders)
@johnfrancis6413
@johnfrancis6413 2 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why Orthodox are still hung up on what some peasants did 800 years ago . It was not organised . It was not pre planned .
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese
@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese Жыл бұрын
@@johnfrancis6413 The Filioque is a blantant heresy that was rejected by Saint Augustine. There is no reason to believe in such a doctrine if one is a Christian as it is an innovation. St. Augustine in his De fide et Symbolo, teaches that Father is the sole source of the Son and the Holy Spirit, and what Holy Spirit is, He owes only to the Father, says st. Augustine: "Holy Spirit is not born from the Father, as Son is, because Christ is the only Son, nor Holy Spirit is born of the Son, as grandson of the highest Father, but, what Holy Spirit is, he owes to no one, but to the Father from Whom is everything, so we do not introduce two sources (non duo principia sine principio), which would be a complete lie and complete absurdness, and such teaching is not part of the Catholic faith, but the error of some heretics." Latin original: "non genitum Spiritum Sanctum tamquam Filium de Patre praedicent; unicus enim est Christus: neque de Filio tamquam nepotem summi Patris: nec tamen id quod est, nulli debere, sed Patri, ex quo omnia; ne duo constituamus principia sine principio, quod falsissimum est et absurdissimum, et non catholicae fidei, sed quorumdam haereticorum errori proprium." The sack of 1204 was caused by the heresies of the West and it's protest of the conciliar teaching of the Church with respect to dogma and practice (lying about the filioque always been in the creed, lying about priestly celibacy being universal and lying about unleaved bread which is an apolonarian practice) which inevitably resulted in the violence seen at the sack of New Rome, the Robber council of Florence, the selling of canons to the Turks to aid in their conquest of Constantinople, and even today with Serbs attacking Croatians. The East will not forget 1204 because the east will not forget its martyrs, not its confessors or its history. The West constantly forgets. It's forgotten the Hesychasm of Saint Columba of Ireland, Gregory the Greats condemnation of a doctrine of "bishop of bishops", a the old calendar, proper evangelism in favor of syncretism, and it's forgotten the first millennium conciliar nature of the Church in favor of the ultramontanism of Hildebrand of Sovana.
@mikhail2709
@mikhail2709 Жыл бұрын
@@johnfrancis6413 Remember the Martyrs
@fr.davidbibeau621
@fr.davidbibeau621 3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful Interview!
@OrthobroAustin
@OrthobroAustin 3 жыл бұрын
Ohhh I’m excited for this one
@briandelaney9710
@briandelaney9710 3 жыл бұрын
It will definitely not be in my lifetime but it is my heartfelt prayer that my Church now (The Orthodox Church ) could reunify with the Church of my and family and heritage (the Catholic Church )
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
That would be beautiful
@sonialorris7537
@sonialorris7537 3 жыл бұрын
AMEN AMEN AMEN!
@Georgios1821
@Georgios1821 3 жыл бұрын
You mean that the Bishop of Rome would come back again to the Church
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
The ball is in Rome's court to reverse all the changes since the Great Schism was final.
@nemeart
@nemeart 3 жыл бұрын
I wish that too ...
@Ssilki_V_Profile
@Ssilki_V_Profile 2 жыл бұрын
I am very glad to see you! I am especially glad to see the icons in your office! We have a very wary attitude towards ecumenism. In our understanding, the Church is the visible unity of Christians - that is, people chosen by God. Therefore, we think like this: There can be only one Church, according to our understanding, the Church is the Orthodox Church. Of course, we calmly understand that other people can see the Truth not in Orthodoxy, and even more, they do not recognize the very principle of the uniqueness of the Confession. And this difference does not interfere with the dialogue, but, on the contrary, is a pretext for it. However, we see a certain kind of difference between such talk and ecumenism. For us, ecumenism sounds like a synonym for attempts to unite around dogmatic differences. For example - to start performing joint prayers.
@ambroserose762
@ambroserose762 3 жыл бұрын
Great show, another great guest idea, would be Fr. Stephen De Young a PHD and Orthodox Priest who's new book The religion of the Apostles is amazing. I believe all your listeners would be fascinated to hear a bible scholar like Dr. Michael Heiser and who is also a early Church Fathers and 2nd Temple Jewish scholar etc.
@polybix7517
@polybix7517 3 жыл бұрын
I pray to Jesus that we will all be reunited again. As a catholic I wish the best for my protestant and orthodox brothers and sisters and one day be in Heaven together. I just want to let you all know I love you all and I hope you have an awesome day. Viva christo rey!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@nemeart
@nemeart 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, may God help us all !
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
If Rome will revert back to its pre 9th century version we could. :-/
@aiziszizis2536
@aiziszizis2536 3 жыл бұрын
Polybix We cannot unite with heretics. Become Orthodox, come back to the faith you had before 1054!
@Quantum1008
@Quantum1008 3 жыл бұрын
@@aiziszizis2536 There has been a lot of theological work between the Orthodox Churches and the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is bending over backward to be accommodating and welcome the Orthodox back. They have sought to carefully clarify what their teachings are to reassure the Orthodox that they too reject these heresies. For example, the Vatican has made a definitive statement clarifying that the unmodified Greek language creed of 381 is the true Faith of the Church. They acknowledge that when the filioque is translated into Greek it can be interpreted in a heretical way and the explicitly reject that heresy. They never slow the filioque in liturgies celebrated in the Greek language for that very reason. The filioque does not mean that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son from eternity as from an origin. They authoritatively teach that the Father is the only unoriginate divine person and the only one who eternally begets his Son and spirates his Holy Spirit. Even so, they are seriously thinking about removing the filioque from the Roman Rite. And the recent Pope’s have recited the Creed without it together with Eastern Patriarchs. Concerning Purgatory, as another example, the Orthodox know that only the pure in spirit shall see God. Even forgiven sins have lasting effects such as persistent passions, attachments to created things, spiritual wounds. We all know Christians who are not yet saints, I’m one of them. What happens if I die before these wounds are fully healed? Saint Mark of Ephesus taught that Christians who die with minor sins or without having had time to bring forth the full fruits of repentance would be detained temporarily in hell, not for punishment, but as a kind of temporary purifying or healing that prepares the souls for heaven. That is why we pray that the soul of the departed will find rest with the saints. Pope Benedict wrote concerning Purgatory that it might just be the soul’s encounter with the glorious risen Christ at the moment of death, an encounter the burns away all the wounds of sin that have hindered or retarded our spiritual growth in life. They have shown that their doctrine can be harmonized with the Orthodox point of view. Concerning the papacy, if by papacy we mean that all the bishops on earth are not really bishops but only papal representatives without any real episcopal authority then this would be egregious. We also know that Pope’s can be very bad, even say things that are wrong and damaging. They are not meant to be infallible in everything they do and say, just like any other Patriarch they are men. The Catholic Church admits that in the past the office of the papacy has been exercised in an extreme manner and has apologized for the damage this has done. They are moving to reemphasize the conciliar or synodal nature of church government. Pope John Paul II wrote to the world about his desire to reimagine the papacy to make it more helpful and desirable to all Christians in the service of unity. The Catholic Church is currently going through a crisis, very much like the iconoclast crisis in the Eastern Churches. But the Orthodox Churches are in crisis as well. There are actually two Orthodox Churches today in schism with one another. There is supposed to be One Holy Apostolic Church. Which one is the true Church? Properly understood, communion with the Bishop of Rome provides a single point of connection to all the other particular churches so that membership in the Church is objective, unambiguous, and organic, just as the hand and foot are clearly part of the body because they are connected to the head. The Pope is meant to be the head of the church only in the sense of being the first hierarch in the in the visible administration of the Church and elder brother among his brother patriarchs, just as the Patriarch is the head of his Autocephalous Church and elder brother to his brother bishops. Christ is still the supreme Head of the Church and the ultimate authority over all the bishops, even the Pope. All these things are basically what Saint Basil the Great, Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Gregory the Great, Saint Maximus the Confessor, and Saint John of Damascus believed and taught. Reunion is possible if the Orthodox can humble themselves to forgive their brothers and choose to work for mutual understanding and love, not compromising on doctrine, but allowing the other side to explain themselves and then vigorously debate the differences as we work to represent our ideas in ways that are acceptable to each other, until we come to one mind with integrity and unity. This is the Christian way, not division and schism like the Protestants, but coming together and talking things out until we come to one mind. This what we were so good at in the early Church, at the Ecumenical Councils. But today, like the Protestants, we show the world our schismatic hatred of each other by our divisions. Reunion will be impossible if the Orthodox stubbornly hold on to their old hatreds, prideful self-satisfaction, and straw man arguments that misrepresent their opponents views and seek to magnify differences rather than to dialogue with integrity for love of our brothers. “Let us call brothers even those who hate us and forgive all by the Resurrection.”
@erosjagatpulagana6403
@erosjagatpulagana6403 3 жыл бұрын
Sure thing, Austin. I'd enjoy this
@TheOfficialManev
@TheOfficialManev 3 жыл бұрын
I truly enjoy such conversations. My being on the conservative side of that dialogue means that I see the Catholic Church as the main reason why this would be impossible. Meaning - I believe catholics would never be ready to set aside the biggest differences between the Church and Catholicism - the infalliability of the pope, being the main one. However, I do pray that I am wrong and that better times come upon us so we could all be reunited in the Church. I would also like to express my admiration for your openness to such discussions. I've had a hard time communicating with my protestant and evangelical friends when it comes to origins of the Church, worship, and history. God bless you!
@Tania-gp8ew
@Tania-gp8ew 3 жыл бұрын
New to this channel!. Thanks for hosting this and many others discussions Austin! They are being very helpful in my spiritual journey. I am learning a lot from your guests :D Regards from Spain
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the channel!
@theosteven3362
@theosteven3362 2 жыл бұрын
Anybody knows what canon of what council father was referring in 35:11 ?
@Will-wu1gb
@Will-wu1gb 3 жыл бұрын
"That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me." John 17:21 Let us answer the prayer of Jesus.
@6williamson
@6williamson 3 жыл бұрын
It is true that so few take this seriously.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
If we could have one Faith, one baptism, one Lord of all unity would be possible but that hasn't come to be.
@emilialyngdoh5490
@emilialyngdoh5490 3 жыл бұрын
I like your introduction Austin
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@carolhannah4635
@carolhannah4635 3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks. Amen to unity. We have no idea really what it will look like and how it will come about only God knows. Working with all our Christian brothers and sisters is a start. I love and agree the comment 'where we live.' So true.🙏🙏🙏
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@Christina-ww2np
@Christina-ww2np 3 жыл бұрын
God bless you 🙏
@kirkjungles4901
@kirkjungles4901 3 жыл бұрын
"The mind of Christ is that in every city, there would be one Eucharista, one loaf of bread, one cup, one bishop, one presbyterate; and if we don't have that in our town, then the will of God isn't actualized. So what are we doing to make the will of the Lord a reality in our city?" Please pray for unity.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
All waiting on the Roman Catholic church.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Amen
@davidpope2189
@davidpope2189 2 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed and appreciated this video. Fr. Laurent's love for both Orthodox and Catholic churches rings through. I hope soon to acquire his book, along with a few others by Orthodox authors. As a side note, Austin, just curious: Are you familiar with Metropolitan Kallistos Ware? I think he would be an excellent person to have on your channel sometime.
@deepwildviolet
@deepwildviolet 2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the Metropolitan is getting on in years and doesnt seem to be doing as many interviews as of late. Would be very interesting though, you are right.
@TrollsFormers05
@TrollsFormers05 3 жыл бұрын
I greately appreciate his work. Sometimes I get the sense that the reunion effort is mostly one sided, being promoted by Rome and at best ignored by the East.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you appreciate it!
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
Sadly, for good reason on the East's side.
@joer9156
@joer9156 Жыл бұрын
The East would be glad to reunite with Rome if and when Rome repents of her heresies.
@alacson100
@alacson100 3 жыл бұрын
I for one would say that a reunion of both parties would make them a force to be reckoned with.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
How so?
@jamesstandifer1683
@jamesstandifer1683 3 жыл бұрын
We are united to Christ by grace through faith.
@prolelog
@prolelog 3 жыл бұрын
Fr Cleenewerck’s book gave me an odd sense of solace last here in DC when things were tightly shut down and I found myself with a lot of time to really look at my Catholicism in relation to the claims of Eastern Orthodoxy. I felt a very brotherly spirit in the Father’s writing, and certainly made me look more seriously into Orthodoxy’s claims-now I find myself looking in the DMV area for a Greek Catholic/Byzantine Rite parish, and I truly have Father Cleenewerck as well as Kallistos Ware to thank!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@kevinninja787
@kevinninja787 Жыл бұрын
Did you find one!? Depending on where you live Patronage Mother of God in Arbutus is outstanding in terms of an excellent liturgy with the Carpatho Rusyn plainchant. Epiphany in Annandale, VA is also a VERY active parish with a beautiful Caprathian style church. Also near Potomac there is a beautiful Melkite parish which is actually the largest in the country. You also have some Ukrainian Catholic parishes in Silver Spring and Baltimore but just be aware they are much more old world in terms of having a litugy in Ukranian rather than English.
@Annah-mm4nz
@Annah-mm4nz 3 жыл бұрын
@Gospel Simplicity - having done this interview and understanding the issues with the N.O. they also have, do you now understand why Traditional Catholics take issue with it? I know you thought it was off putting at first, but now can you see it comes from a place of righteousness? Our Lord deserves all respect and reverence.
@quayscenes
@quayscenes 3 жыл бұрын
Another incredible episode to add to my shortlist of GS GOATs! 🐐 I learned so much from this discussion. I feel it necessary, however, to voice a pushback on the marginalization of Vatican II and Pope Francis. I will offer the scandalous suggestion that the Church is more than theology and ecclesiology [open lions den, step in]... The church has a great pastoral role as well. I feel that a great strength of Vatican II and especially Pope Francis is a renewed and expanded commitment to the pastoral role of the church. Sadly, even within the Catholic Church there is a fundamentalist spirit that is at odds with the Living Magisterium. Cardinal Newman recognized that there is a development of doctrine. The church grows. It does not look exactly as it did 2000 years ago - in the same way a grown man does not look like a child. PS Kudos for not mentioning even once the Filioque! Now bring on the lions...
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for sharing those thoughts on Vatican 2 and Pope Francis
@robmorgan3842
@robmorgan3842 3 жыл бұрын
You may be interested to know that in the Eucharistic Prayer of the 1962 Latin Mass Liturgy we pray for union with the orthodox. The prayer was altered in the Novus Ordo and dropped the reference to the orthodox. It goes "We, therefore, humbly pray and beseech Thee, most merciful Father, through Jesus Christ Thy Son, our Lord, that Thou wouldst accept and bless these gifts, these presents, these holy unspotted sacrifices, which, in the first place, we offer Thee for Thy holy Catholic Church, which Thou mayst vouchsafe to pacify, guard, unite and govern throughout the world: together with Thy Servant N., our Pope, N. our Bishop, as also all orthodox believers and promoters of the Catholic and Apostolic faith."
@gandalfthegreatestwizard7275
@gandalfthegreatestwizard7275 3 жыл бұрын
That's not correct. "Orthodox" in the Roman canon isn't a reference to the Eastern Orthodox Christians, it's a reference to the "orthodox" in the literal sense of the word, i.e. holding the right belief- a Greek word which was loaned into Latin. In the current English translation of the ordinary form of the Roman rite, it is translated as "holding to the truth" to avoid exactly this misunderstanding. We should pray for unity with our Eastern Orthodox brothers and sisters, but that is not what the text is talking about.
@Jordan-1999
@Jordan-1999 3 жыл бұрын
The Eastern Orthodox Church is *officially* called the Orthodox Catholic Church. This is the name by which the Church refers to itself in its liturgical or canonical texts. The longer name for the Church is actually Holy, Orthodox, Catholic, (and) Apostolic Church.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@camilasalcedo6761
@camilasalcedo6761 3 жыл бұрын
@Gospel Simplicity -- Hey Austin! Just wanted to share a quick thought. My name is Camila, a student of Theology at Notre Dame just a couple of hours down East! I'm Catholic, mixed origins but pretty much Catholic. There was a time in which I *almost* went Orthodox, and didn't because of John Henry Newman. You should *really* look into him. He's amazing! So so grateful for all the gifts I've found in the Catholic Church since choosing to remain here (ADORATION-Exposition for instance! Really really life-changing). The river has become clearer through time because God has always guided her and never failed to stay in the Catholic Church as He promised. I'm kind of new to your channel but I love it so far. So sorry if I'm repeating something I have not yet seen!!
@sethlevine1040
@sethlevine1040 3 жыл бұрын
Did Newman ever acknowledge the differences between eastern and western Christianity?
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the recommendation! He’s on my reading list! I’ve read parts of development of doctrine for a paper, but not anywhere close to cover to cover. Would you start there, Apologia pro vita sua or elsewhere?
@TheLadyPlantagenet
@TheLadyPlantagenet 3 жыл бұрын
@@sethlevine1040 he tried to say they were broadly the same with the branch theory
@tonyjames9016
@tonyjames9016 3 жыл бұрын
I am a raised Roman Catholic that converted to Orthodoxy and now is returning to communion with Rome but within the Byzantine Catholic Church... Orthodox in practice and belief, communion with Rome in the spirit and pursuit of One Church. There are so many discussions that could take place, but the truth is that in the end, there should be no division within the Church and we should strive for that. May Lord Have Mercy on All of Us
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
Byzantines are not Orthodox and cannot retain the Faith under Rome.
@albedtunu2183
@albedtunu2183 3 жыл бұрын
Hello austin...I'm from Indonesia..Can you make an Indonesian translation in every video you make?🙏
@ThruTheUnknown
@ThruTheUnknown 3 жыл бұрын
I have the Greek new testament bible it's a really great version IMHO in fact my favourite, so awesome to hear from the author himself as well.
@colmwhateveryoulike3240
@colmwhateveryoulike3240 3 жыл бұрын
Did he translate a version?
@zachstevens4205
@zachstevens4205 3 жыл бұрын
Just noticed you have the same good shepherd icon as I do!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@educationalporpoises9592
@educationalporpoises9592 3 жыл бұрын
You have an icon???
@triscat
@triscat 3 жыл бұрын
Humility.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
A wonderful virtue
@trevorbinning4683
@trevorbinning4683 3 жыл бұрын
I might have been a bit more open to what Fr. Laurent had to say here if he didn’t open with, “The Orthodox Church has a dysfunctional ecclesiology” (please note I’m paraphrasing). Reunion is a great thing to strive for but it can’t happen on anything other than who is Truth: Christ. As Christ is One, so the Church is One. We can’t speak of the Church as two united in some aspect but not in all, especially when such separation is in terms of Faith.
@colmwhateveryoulike3240
@colmwhateveryoulike3240 3 жыл бұрын
Really liked his vision. I would like to see a conversation with him and Fr Peter Heers, who seems to be a strong voice against ecumenism, albeit not in any way I've seen to be absolutely closed off to reasonable avenues. I think such a discussion could help highlight the potential path forward that would work for Orthodox Churches. AND after that maybe you could get Dr Gavin Ortland involved so we can all unite! Come on Austin you can get this party started! ;D
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Now that could be interesting haha
@claesvanoldenphatt9972
@claesvanoldenphatt9972 3 жыл бұрын
Heers would pan any effort to sort out the schisms. I don’t see him agreeing there is any need for it and has built his ministry on reifying the wall between Catholic and Orthodox churches. I think he would deny that it’s possible for Rome to be Church properly speaking.
@colmwhateveryoulike3240
@colmwhateveryoulike3240 3 жыл бұрын
@@claesvanoldenphatt9972 I did ask him once what he made of saints and miracles in Catholicism and he replied quite rightly that he can't rule out God being at work in other denominations but he still believes Orthodoxy is the truest and therefore best/most appropriate church to be in. Now I am paraphrasing from memory but I'm sure he would have some conditions that, if met, would constitute a reasonable ecumenical progress to reunification. I suspect it would effectively mean Catholics would return to pre-schism positions but I'd love to see it laid out and then discussed with Catholics.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@colmwhateveryoulike3240 They would reset as you said and become the local Roman church again and no more Uniates.
@colmwhateveryoulike3240
@colmwhateveryoulike3240 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria Pardon my ignorance but what's a "uniate"?
@MouseCheese2010
@MouseCheese2010 3 жыл бұрын
I really like his NT translation. It’s a shame the LXX was never finished :(
@jaqian
@jaqian 3 жыл бұрын
Is it in English?
@MouseCheese2010
@MouseCheese2010 3 жыл бұрын
@@jaqian yes. It’s called EOB New Testament. Its available from Amazon (paperback with all the notes) or NewRomePress in faux leather with a zipper just the text, or LegacyIcons in a two volume hardback i think just the text plus some liturgy stuff added
@HickoryDickory86
@HickoryDickory86 3 жыл бұрын
I have and really like the Newrome Press edition. I would love to see Fr. Laurent's translation used in future editions of the Orthodox Study Bible. I also think it's sad that they aren't working on the Septuagint. In my idealistic mind, if the Orthodox Study Bible used the EOB for its NT, then perhaps its editors could continue to work on and refine their own Septuagint translation (which I hear is just a modernized update of the KJV's Old Testament with Apocrypha), or even better, license Lexham Press' Septuagint and edit it accordingly where fitting.
@OrthobroAustin
@OrthobroAustin 3 жыл бұрын
@@HickoryDickory86 Yes! This is what I messaged then concerning! But with all do respect to the texts handed down to us, I do as of current consider the Hebrew to be a superior representation of the Old Testament and in general more correctly convey everything, not that the LXX doesn’t maintain the same Holy Spirit in it. And so I think we would do better by standing on the Peshitto more than the LXX, since it has been handed down through the apostolic Christian church and is also a translation of the Hebrew (and a language much closer to it).
@OrthobroAustin
@OrthobroAustin 3 жыл бұрын
@@HickoryDickory86 And the legend of the LXX only pertains to the five Books of Moses, and not the other prophets and writings.
@hmkzosimaskrampis3185
@hmkzosimaskrampis3185 3 жыл бұрын
The Church Militant can only be on track when it follows in the Spirit and Tradition of the Church Triumphant
@GregReed1962
@GregReed1962 3 жыл бұрын
Austin, you should contact Erin Doom, who is the director of Eighth Day Institue out of Wichita, KS. It is a organization that Orthodox, Catholics, and Protestants come together to discuss theological topics. It has been around for almost 15 years now. Your audience may find it quite intersting to hear about it, and its work.
@autisticheadscarf
@autisticheadscarf 3 жыл бұрын
Ooooof very excited for this! ☦️
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Hope you enjoy it!
@danglingondivineladders3994
@danglingondivineladders3994 3 жыл бұрын
me too
@abigailguzman4845
@abigailguzman4845 3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if Austin could interview the Pope ... with a translator of course haha
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, now there's a good goal!
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Or I could do it in spanish and make it really exciting
@abigailguzman4845
@abigailguzman4845 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity haha! definitely would expand your audience
@Ericviking2019
@Ericviking2019 3 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t he speak English?
@fatrick9001
@fatrick9001 3 жыл бұрын
The Pope is a marxist globalist apostate, and probably doesn't even believe in God.
@KristynLorraine
@KristynLorraine 3 жыл бұрын
Our Catholic priests can only Confirm at Easter Vigil and on Pentecost. The ordinary for Confirmation is the Bishop.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
In Orthodoxy Presbyters can.
@sir.joshuarane.doebler3762
@sir.joshuarane.doebler3762 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jesus. Praise and glory to God. God Bless. Jesus Christ, is the name of God. He lives. Praise and Bless God's holy name.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Amen
@isaiahkerstetter3142
@isaiahkerstetter3142 3 жыл бұрын
Interview Fr. Spyridon next.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Not next, but hopefully soon!
@danglingondivineladders3994
@danglingondivineladders3994 3 жыл бұрын
I'm a sinner, I really am
@jaqian
@jaqian 3 жыл бұрын
We are all
@la.x-neverthedodgers
@la.x-neverthedodgers 3 жыл бұрын
Aren't we all 💔😢🙏🏻
@maryemilysmiley6146
@maryemilysmiley6146 3 жыл бұрын
Austin, thank you for the interview w Father Laurent. I agree with his observation that the Eucharist is the Church along with the Body of Christ. I listened at night twice and may have fallen asleep so if my question has been addressed in the interview my apologies. Did Father ever discuss the Filioque? It was inserted in the 800s in Spain to clarify Jesus as true God and true man in the battle against Arianism and later picked up by the Latin rite aka Rome. The Lord must be patiently waiting for us to get past our sibling rivalry. If you interview him again would love to hear more about Orthodox objections compared with Eastern Rite Orthodox in communion w Rome. Don't know how you do your studies and interviews. I would think you must get exhausted. Thanks for all your hard work.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
Eastern Rite Catholics are not Orthodox.
@maryemilysmiley6146
@maryemilysmiley6146 3 жыл бұрын
Yes. I agree. I meant that as a descriptive as they were Orthodox who returned to communion w Rome. As Eastern Rite there liturgy is that of Orthodox, their priests may marry. Thought it would be a good topic regarding the different rites among Catholics.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@maryemilysmiley6146 Orthodox Catholics were never in the Roman Catholic Communion as the Roman church was one local church in the Church pre-schism. Therefore those Byzantine Catholic forefathers are former Orthodox Catholics who schismed. Their Liturgy is Byzantine Rite to a point but not Orthodox as they are no longer in communion with the Orthodox Catholic Church. This matters. There are 7 rites in the RCC and 24 churches. The history of the Byzantine Uniates is not good. No Priests can marry. They may only be married before ordination.
@maryemilysmiley6146
@maryemilysmiley6146 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria 👍
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@maryemilysmiley6146 Glad you understand and agree.
@daydreamerbeliever130
@daydreamerbeliever130 3 жыл бұрын
My comments keep disappearing on youtube app: Please can you do a talk with Father Spyridon Bailey? Also I do not think we will reunite until the papacy/Rome repents of their theological innovations and returns to Orthodoxy as it once was which we should pray for. One should not sacrifice sound doctrine and truth for the illusion of unity.
@MrPeach1
@MrPeach1 3 жыл бұрын
What invention
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I'd be happy to do an interview with him
@marcuslow1386
@marcuslow1386 3 жыл бұрын
As usual the arrogance!
@daydreamerbeliever130
@daydreamerbeliever130 3 жыл бұрын
@@marcuslow1386 Many would cry arrogance for claiming Christ is the only Way Truth and Life. Truth by nature is exclusive, especially when it comes to such crucial dogmas in Christology, Trinitarian, Ecclesial theology of which there is an undeniable difference.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@marcuslow1386 To be fair the RC side has their own arrogance.
@matthewbartko5255
@matthewbartko5255 3 жыл бұрын
I am a Baptist and have really enjoyed your conversations with Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox believers. Do you have interest in talking with Eastern Catholics and or Oriental orthodox believers? I recently finished The Lost History of Christianity, The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church - and How It Died, By: Philip Jenkins and was moved to learn more about non European Christianity. Of course seeing you help Methodist, Presbyterian, Pentecostal, Mennonite, Lutheran, etc... believers understand each other better would be great as well. To take it even further Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Rastafarians also claim Christ, through I would not call them Christians. The Jewish and Islamic faiths also have much in common with us. Not to detract from the audience and network of connections you've built but similar content from the church universal, aka all Christians, and or other faiths of the book would be valuable to me :) God bless you for all your work and service for the Kingdom.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I’m hoping to broaden the interviews a bit, and I’ve been working on having some Oriental Orthodox on!
@matthewbartko5255
@matthewbartko5255 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity that's great to hear!
@joshuagilmore7522
@joshuagilmore7522 2 жыл бұрын
This priest speaks of the only severe defect of the Catholic church as Vatican II liturgical worship problems. But what about all the theological defects that have hindered the union? Original sin theology? Filioque? Immaculate conception? Papal infallibility? These aren’t major defects? What do the 20th and 21st century saints say about these issues? It’s clear that the Orthodox want unity of the church. But at What cost? As people have mentioned, the church fathers fought to keep heresies out of the church.
@untoages
@untoages 3 жыл бұрын
As someone who is looking into Orthodoxy and is put off by this "we're the true church and everyone else is heretical"-type ecclesiology, I have to say that this man's approach is quite refreshing.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I’m glad to hear that! I struggle with the mindset you referred to as well
@Yallquietendown
@Yallquietendown 3 жыл бұрын
If Christ says that he is *the* way wouldn’t it make sense that Christ in his mystical body (the Church) would continue to proclaim that he is THE way and that there are not multiple ways?
@masterchief8179
@masterchief8179 3 жыл бұрын
@@Yallquietendown I agree with you: the Church as the Mystical Body of Christ is indeed the continuation/forgoing of the mystery of Incarnation throughout our historical time and space, visibly and with full functionality, animated by the life of the Holy Spirit. That’s why Our Savior and Redeemer said He would build His Church like we learned from the Gospels: _”And I tell you, you are _*_PETER, and on this ROCK I will BUILD MY CHURCH,_*_ and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven”_ (Matthew 16, 18-19). Of course later Jesus Christ gave all the Apostles together the power of binding and loosing too (Matthew 18, 18), which reflects the complement for collegiality as far as ecclesial TEACHING AUTHORITY goes, so it must all be in compass with the perfect law-giver’s wisdom. It does not signify therefore an annulment of the Petrine authority, due to two theological facts: 1) it was given to Peter with specificity, anteriority and prominence, singularly addressing to him - even by name (and function: name changing) - directly and individually among all the Apostles; 2) only to Peter Our Lord gave - individually - the “keys of the Kingdom” and no other Apostle or disciple were commanded to receive them from Jesus. Thus it explains the convergence in the Church teaching/magisterial authority both of the 1) Petrine teaching authority, in the power of the Keys (= Papal authority: Mt 16, 18-19) and the 2) gathered Apostolic collegiate teaching authority with Peter (not apart from Peter) (=Ecumenical Councils’ authority: Mt 18, 18). Those parallelisms tend to be more or less crystalline to Catholic ecclesiologists, even though in good faith we must obviously admit it was not always evident (although linearly describable in doctrinal development, never “per saltum” or with “jumps’), but one must say the Holy Spirit perpetually proved the genuine life of the Church in this very functionality. Of course, I fully understand the collegial decision-making processes of our common structural ecclesiology (Catholic and Orthodox). But that proved to work at the regional level only for EO. If the highest authority and the universal jurisdiction of the Orthodox Church is embodied in the Holy Ecumenical Council, it is entirely obvious that the lack of it for a thousand years or almost seven hundred years (at the very least, due to the lack of even a secure theory to define an Ecumenical Council) should say enough on some ecclesiastical dysfunctionality or, for the much more obvious position, the lack of universality “in re ipsa”. History shows (not without tensions, fights, political interferences, Imperial megalomania, attempts of capturing the papacy, antipopes, persecutions, many small schisms and healed unity, some big separations unhealed to this day, and the clear growing in the conscience of the faithful about revealed ecclesiological Truths: John 16, 12-13) this dynamics. And the Catholic Church in fact teaches it: it is not my particular opinion but the (complex) ecclesiology proclaimed in the combination of both Vatican I, interrupted due to wars, and Vatican II (pretty much defeating Gallicanism and Ultramontanism, thus settling the remnants of persistent ecclesiological disputes inside the Catholic Church in a matter of fact).
@retxedjr
@retxedjr 3 жыл бұрын
I remember a time when the roman catholics used to profess "we're the true church and everyone else is heretical" to everyone. However, they have been subverted for so many years and at every turn they have been let down. For example, The closing of schools, the child abuse scandals, the jesuit order, decrease in monastics etc. The laity has really suffered and it shows. Many in my family had strong Roman Catholic upbringings but their faiths have waned from the above stated instances. Many have become atheist or don't practice the faith anymore. That being said, the Orthodox do what has always been done in regards to preaching the faith. For example, Have you ever seen some of Michael Voris's stuff or how about E. Michael Jones. Look at some older clips of RC right here on youtube. I love EMJ but he'll sure tell you in a heartbeat about joining the Catholic Church. Oh yes, I am old enough to remember a time when the "we're the true church" was preached loud and proudly the RC. I'm trying to love everyone as Christ loved us but it is often hard. On the other hand, their are plenty of Orthodox channels and people out there that minister in a way to your liking. Do me a favor and take a look at Father Spyridon Bailey's channel and tell me that he isn't living the faith or trying to help us all figure out. I've just been hearing this same sentiment lately and the Orthodox don't corner the market on saying that they are the true church. The Orthodox have their problem's as well but let's not just let our presuppositions cloud the Holy Spirit from guiding you. Just for transparency, I'm inquiring into the Orthodox church after looking into the Roman Catholic Church after years of being a protestant. Funny thing, I used to be one of those people that said that about my little church before I even knew who the church fathers were. God Bless you all.
@nemeart
@nemeart 3 жыл бұрын
I am sorry if I am doing this kind of stuffs... for my case I was told all my life that catholics and orthodoxs were the same except for the pope, I grew up like this never questionning more but I wanted to know more about the orthodox Church and most people even inside the orthodox Church thought our differences don't really matter. But one day someone told me, no God is everywhere, but this is not the same, that resonnated with me, I always felt like there was some kind of mystery people are not willing to unveil... That is only logical after all and I started to discover the orthodox world and really it is not same, not that I don't learn things from protestants or catholics but the spiritual depth of this tradition seems to me very much more profound... A few years before, I wouldn't have said nothing but starting reading and learning a lot mostly from the internet I came to the conclusion that one Church has to be right... I think most comments that may sound a bit harsh for you come from people who converted and came to see the differences and are maybe a bit unhabile to show it to you... and want to proclaim it to their ex churches. But this is uneasy because it is maybe a way you have to choose on your own, not by hearing others words but by experiencing yourself... so I am really sorry if I have done this kind of things, really indeed the best thing to do is to pray...
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
Hello, @Gospel Simplicity. I am a Brazilian Orthodox. The priest was very correct in saying that he longs for the unity of the Church like that of the first millennium. And we should really pray for the unity of the Body. Unfortunately I am pessimistic about such a unity today - and Father was right to mention the difficulty of the Second Vatican Council - because it is difficult for Rome to revoke the numerous ecclesiological and doctrinal innovations that separate us today. On the contrary, it is with great sadness that I see these innovations being assimilated by Constantinople in wanting to set itself up as a kind of orthodox pope. Lamentable! Unfortunately we have reached the times when the Church will become less and less - a remnant.
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
In this story of unity, some nuances are lost. For example: Orthodoxy would change practically nothing in any theological or ecclesiological sense - the Orthodox Church today is the same as it was in the first millennium. On the other hand, for the union to be a true union of faith and not around a cathedra, the theology, ecclesiology and dogmas would have to be the same, and I'm not sure Rome would be interested in giving up that much. Minor issues like culture, wearing a beard, etc., are things that would have no problem in the name of a union. But what about the College of Cardinals, an arrangement made by Rome to make up for the lack of the College of Bishops of the first millennium, would they be willing to eliminate this institution? Would the cardinals be willing to accept this fate? Or the Pope himself, would he accept the role of final instance and primacy of the college of bishops instead of the pompous title of universal bishop? And I am not sure I understand Father Cleenewerck's position regarding the primacy of Peter. Primacy is not supremacy! Peter was not the supreme head, so much so that at the Council of Jerusalem it is James who presides over the Council, and Peter accepts the decision of the Council, giving his opinion. And Paul, who states in one of his letters that he is not lesser in anything than the other apostles, including Peter. But I'm not sure I understood Father Cleenewerck's opinion correctly.
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
@Brian Ortiz Well, Vatican II is a complete departure of the Church of Rome from its entire history and tradition, a break with the Holy Fathers of the Church and the entire Orthodoxy of the Faith. It was a radical change in its ecclesiology and theology, something that had been going on for some time since the schism with the East, but Vatican II was something drastic that today Roman apologists and theologians strive to minimize and say that there was no break, but do the following exercise: go back to that time and look at the reaction of the serious clergy themselves at that time. See that many were dissatisfied and lost. Do you know the hieromonk Gabriel Bunge? He was a student of Joseph Ratizinger, also known as Benedict XVI. In 1866, a Roman clergyman named Abbe Guetee, checked the early Church documents and came to the same conclusion and so - that same year - he published the book "The Papacy". Specifically, about the Second Vatican Council, I refer you to the book "The Ecclesiological Renewal of the Second Vatican Council: An Orthodox Examination of Rome's Ecumenical Theology on Baptism and the Church" by fr. Peter Heers. It is a study of the Council from an orthodox point of view.
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
@Brian Ortiz I didn't understand. When I get there? Get where? I said that Vatican II is an ecclesiological break with what was within the Roman church. Is that not enough?
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
@Brian Ortiz No, so ... I started by saying in the first comment that I am Brazilian. But I indicated a book that deals specifically with the council, said that it is a total break from the ecclesiology of the ancient Roman church. See this quote from Fr. Peter Heers of the indicated book: "Thus, on the eve of the Council, the majority of Latin theologians had reached a new consensus that, by virtue of certain elements, primarily Baptism, non-Roman Catholics participated, at different levels, During the assembly, this consensus in favor of a graduated participation in the life of the Church became the basis for the establishment of a complete new ecclesiology in the final texts of the Council. Rome and the consideration of dissidents, whose roots can be traced to the long disintegration of initiation rites and theology of Baptism. As part of the ecumenical openness and the drive to be inclusive in relation to the heterodox in the mystery of the Church, Vatican II accepted the idea that the Roman Church is not the totality of the Body of Christ, but only a part of it. This is evident in the abandonment of the simple identification of the Roman Church with the Church of Christ and in the introduction of the famous phrase: "The Church one of Christ. ... subsists in the Catholic Church". But it is also evident in the distinction between "full" and "incomplete" communion and in the recognition of "ecclesial elements" outside the Church - fundamental ideologies for the new ecclesiology. This idea that, due to the ecclesial elements that they have in common, the "separated brothers" are not only in partial communion with the Roman Church, but, in fact, they are part of the universal Church, although in some way degraded, it is largely based on the acceptance of a 'common baptism'."
@Tom_Sawyer12
@Tom_Sawyer12 3 жыл бұрын
@Brian Ortiz This is why Latins are perplexed to be told that the Orthodox Church does not recognize Sacraments outside itself. Rome creates the same way in the past, but the breakup of the Council brought this innovation.
@silveriorebelo8045
@silveriorebelo8045 3 жыл бұрын
orthodox have difficult to criticize themselves: yeah, catholics have this and that problem, pope Francis etc, but rarely do they say a word about their own shortcomings - they are the heavenluy church on reath, so, no criticism is welcome
@Ssilki_V_Profile
@Ssilki_V_Profile 2 жыл бұрын
Because it is morally difficult to criticize people that they can be wrong - and at the same time not criticize the Church itself. A certain spiritual discipline is needed here - to talk about shortcomings with reverence for the Holy Order and love for a person - so that the words are not for contention, but for edification.
@thegoldenthread
@thegoldenthread 3 жыл бұрын
Dang that was good.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@jaqian
@jaqian 3 жыл бұрын
I like the hologram idea
@tmcc1647
@tmcc1647 3 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed reading His Broken Body by Fr. Laurent Cleenewerck.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
That’s what we talk about in this interview! I’m glad you enjoyed it. I found it to be really impressive both in scholarship and tone/approach
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
What's it about?
@tmcc1647
@tmcc1647 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria the full title is, “His Broken Body: Understanding and Healing the Schism Between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches.” It really tries to present arguments from both the Roman Catholic and Orthodox side of several different topics. It’s not written as an apologetic book arguing for one side or the another, but merely presenting that the history regarding the schism is complicated. That being said, I began reading it as a Roman Catholic. I am now an Orthodox Christian. I think the book served as a really good starting point for further research.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@tmcc1647 if it means that the Church is divided, that is not Orthodox teaching.
@tmcc1647
@tmcc1647 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria yes. I agree with you. I think he explains the title in the book much better than I can. The conclusion I drew from the book (and more in depth research into the claims of Orthodoxy) is that the Church is indeed One. It is the Orthodox Church. Rome has broken itself from the body. However, it will be welcomed with open arms if it ever wishes to renounce its errors and return. (But I don’t think this will ever happen from a top down conciliar approach…that has been tried many times and failed).
@exposingpowerfullieslivest5082
@exposingpowerfullieslivest5082 3 жыл бұрын
There is nothing rome has that orthodoxy lacks in terms of doctrine and hermeneutics, except of course degeneracy & a bent knee to modernity. Now, I am interested in bringing as many RCs back into the true orthodox Church as possible, but when u not only have a pope, but one that is openly heretical (and that's biting my tongue) and a church created by splitting off the true church because of forgeries, lies, heresies, & degeneracy... Joining the true church to theirs would be a very bad move
@yalechuk6714
@yalechuk6714 3 жыл бұрын
Wow , a times in can't hold my laughter at Orthodox zealots online. A live in Supposedly an orthodox nation but the churches are basically falling apart. If not for government subsidies I'm sure most of them would have fallen apart. The church here is more of national culture than a living church. It's of no use having all your grand theology and not having impact in the souls of men.
@exposingpowerfullieslivest5082
@exposingpowerfullieslivest5082 3 жыл бұрын
@@yalechuk6714 well thats very sad for your country im sorry to hear that. Regardless the theology is true so it matters not whether our churches are in disrepair and if catholic churches are immaculate. What matters is the truth. Idk why you would laugh about someone having zeal about Christ and his church. But you do you
@yalechuk6714
@yalechuk6714 3 жыл бұрын
@@exposingpowerfullieslivest5082 I have had the privilege of seeing the three branches of Christianity. When it comes the evangelism and reaching out to people at their point of need , the Protestant and the Catholics are much more zealous especially in third world countries. Using Africa for example apart from very fee countries say 6-10 example. Most Africans have not heard of orthodoxy. In fact what most Africans refer to as Orthodoxy is the Roman Catholic Church and traditional reformed churches like Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian. So you might have this triumphal joy on how grounded your theology is but in the real world it's not panning out. Secondly the attitude of Orthodox folks online is portraying them in the best light. So for a matured, well researched open-minded Christian orthodoxy might be appealing but for the ordinary joe it isn't so appealing and the Protestant churches know this and and are using it as a good weapon in evangelism. Stop talking down on other branches of Christendom it isn't helping your course. It might help endear you to your tribe and confirm your on believe but it's doing your course no good.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@yalechuk6714 To be fair the same can be said of Rad Trad Roman Catholics, nominal Roman Catholics, and of your churches in Europe and elsewhere.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@yalechuk6714 There are at least four sects to Christianity: Miaphysitism, Orthodoxy, Roman/Uniate Catholicism, and Protestantism. Orthodoxy is actually growing. To be fair there are many RCs and Protestants that turn people off of Christianity completely.
@jonathanskeet5076
@jonathanskeet5076 Жыл бұрын
Singing kumbayah would be the deal breaker for me. (Someone’s yawning Lord, kumbayah, someone’s yawning Lord, kumbayah etc…)
@KelleighDahl
@KelleighDahl 3 жыл бұрын
I have an honest question. Are all the Orthodox Churches the same in their beliefs and practices? Meaning Russian, Greek, etc.? I know that the Roman Catholic Church is the same no matter where in the world it is and am curious if the same is true of the Orthodox? I hope that makes sense as I'm trying to learn. Thanks!
@Leo-uq6jp
@Leo-uq6jp 3 жыл бұрын
We are the same in belief and Tradition, but we somewhat vary in practices, aesthetics, and tradition (notice the capitalization). It's actually similar in the Roman Catholic Church, there are actually varying rites and practices, it is not as unified as you may think in that regard.
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 3 жыл бұрын
Is, in fact, the Roman Catholic Church the same no matter where it is in the world? I think you should probably look into this a bit more...
@KelleighDahl
@KelleighDahl 3 жыл бұрын
@@Leo-uq6jp thanks for responding. I'd like to understand more about my brothers and sisters.
@KelleighDahl
@KelleighDahl 3 жыл бұрын
@@George-ur8ow The theology is the same. There are different types of masses, i.e. high mass, low mass, etc. But we all have the same thing. If that makes sense?
@mariajohnpaul1
@mariajohnpaul1 3 жыл бұрын
Orthodox dogma it self varies ex , Divorce and remarriage. Catholic dogma is same universal.
@sfappetrupavelandrei
@sfappetrupavelandrei 3 жыл бұрын
You were saying at the beginning about Orthodox people being against ecumenism. First of all, we have a background, a history of martyrdom. In our churches we are taught about those who sacrifice themselves for the fate even when the enemy wasn't from outside but from inside. So when you create a culture of making every faithful a protector of the faith, of course people will be extra careful about the idea of unity with those who already separated from us. Second of all, how can you not be anti-change in the Church? Just look at the schism between Constantinople and Moscow. Why is there this schism? Because of struggle for power. So why we would have faith in any choice these bishops do? Third, we have a bunch of saints who become martyrs because of Catholics. This is a wound in the Church which is very hard to heal. I don't know how it is in other countries but Romanian Eastern Catholic branch is a wound for the Romanian Orthodox people because they appeared mostly because of political reasons. Changing the topic, I really love these kind of videos. There are not many youtube channels who would be so open discussing with people from multiple denomination or discuss about hard topics like ecumenism. We like it or not but there is Eastern Orthodoxy, Catholicism, Protestantism, Oriental Orthodoxy and we need to stop ignore them or throw all of them to Hell. Regarding ecumenism I would also be interested a discussion regarding the Oriental Orthodox Churches and their relationship with Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. Sadly many people think that Oriental Orthodox Churches are the same (or in communion) with Eastern Orthodox Churches just because they have Orthodox in the name.
@joecardone4887
@joecardone4887 3 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for this! This would truly change the world. I have to say though it makes me so sad seeing people (I’m sorry but only Greek orthodox) so far not even being open to this. If both churches came together in true humble faith and really really tried to unite the church and let the Holy Spirit guide us, no doubt the church would be United. I strongly believe us being United again would change the world in a lot of beautiful ways! God wants unity. Division is one of Satans favorite tactics.
@Leo-uq6jp
@Leo-uq6jp 3 жыл бұрын
Unity for the sake of worldly comfort is just as immoral as disunity, there is One True Church who's belief are Truly Orthodox, and another who claims to be but is not, the latter must humble themselves and the first must not compromise on their belief.
@joecardone4887
@joecardone4887 3 жыл бұрын
@Metanoia I see what you’re saying but it’s not unity for the sake of unity it should unity in Christ because that’s what God would want. I would say the same thing about the Catholic Church which I believe of course to be the true Church. But if we’re so sure then why not meet, praise, and let the Holy Spirit reveal the truth! There should be no fear of meeting and determining truth if both sides believe they’re right. Humility is the key.
@Leo-uq6jp
@Leo-uq6jp 3 жыл бұрын
@@joecardone4887 The problem is that those meetings are what a Latin approach to this reunion would occur, in our conception, it would simply be Catholic faithful people joining the Church, and confessing Orthodoxy, not some academics signing papers. Any compromise in Orthodoxy is corrupting the faith delivered to the Saints.
@joecardone4887
@joecardone4887 3 жыл бұрын
@Metanoia I like to think if we truly came together in humility and faith and openness to the Holy Spirit it would be almost like another Pentecost. Whether Catholicism or Orthodoxy is true would ideally be revealed. I feel it would be the opposite outcome lol we’ll just agree to disagree brother but the point i’m trying to make is that whatever the Holy Spirit revealed to be the truth would strengthen the Church a lot so I just wish both side were truly open to it and came together as Holy, faithful, and humble leaders.
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 3 жыл бұрын
@@joecardone4887 Humility from the Orthodox perspective would require the Papacy to abandon it's incredible post-schism claims, such as the Roman Church's official dogma of Papal Infallability ex Cathedra in 1870 A.D. I hope you can see the difficulty from the Orthodox perspective in reconciling infallibility and the earth's 'vicar of christ" with an attitude of humility.
@sifu9683
@sifu9683 3 жыл бұрын
One Lord, one faith, one baptism... (eph. 4:5
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
Until that's achieved there can be no unity.
@sifu9683
@sifu9683 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria yes, the "sticking point"...
@frankherbert6476
@frankherbert6476 3 жыл бұрын
(Regarding the dogmatic question of the procession of the Holy Spirit in the filioque and the separation of East and West) “From a religious point of view it is the sole issue of importance in the chain of events which terminated the separation…(this is) a spiritual commitment, a conscious taking of sides in a matter of faith.” Vladimir Lossky Mystical Theology. I would recommend this, or his 'Dogmatic Theology' to dig deeper into Orthodoxy that you've already pursued.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I have both of those books!
@frankherbert6476
@frankherbert6476 3 жыл бұрын
@@GospelSimplicity cool! I would also suggest Jaroslav Pelikan. He was a Lutheran minister and scholar who went back and forth between RC and Orthodox. Good stuff.
@Yallquietendown
@Yallquietendown 3 жыл бұрын
The question about reuniting was already resolved centuries ago. How could we think we are smarter than the people from long ago? How could we just brush away what they decided? Also, if someone is interested in the other church/group no one is stopping him/her from leaving one and going to the other.
@jaqian
@jaqian 3 жыл бұрын
If it was resolved we wouldn't still he talking about it. We should be one body.
@Yallquietendown
@Yallquietendown 3 жыл бұрын
It’s Christ’s body and Christ’s body is one body. “ONE, holy, Catholic, and apostolic church...”
@timadamson4713
@timadamson4713 3 жыл бұрын
@@jaqian the church already is one body in the Orthodox Church
@sonialorris7537
@sonialorris7537 3 жыл бұрын
JPII and Patriarch of Constantinople: "Be watchful, stand firm in your faith, be courageous, be strong. Let all that you do be done in love" (I Cor 16: 13-14). 1. In the spirit of faith in Christ and the reciprocal love that unites us, we thank God for this gift of our new meeting that is taking place on the Feast of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul and witnesses to our firm determination to continue on our way towards full communion with one another in Christ. 2. Many positive steps have marked our common journey, starting above all with the historical event that we are recalling today: the embrace of Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, on 5 and 6 January 1964. We, their Successors, are meeting today to commemorate fittingly before God that blessed encounter, now part of the history of the Church, faithfully recalling it and its original intentions. 3. The embrace in Jerusalem of our respective Predecessors of venerable memory visibly expressed a hope that dwells in all hearts, as the Communiqué declared: "With eyes turned to Christ, together with the Father, the Archetype and Author of unity and of peace, they pray God that this encounter may be the sign and prelude of things to come for the glory of God and the enlightenment of his faithful people. After so many centuries of silence, they have now met with the desire to do the Lord's will and to proclaim the ancient truth of his Gospel, entrusted to the Church" (Common Declaration of Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I, Tomos Agapis, Vatican-Phanar, 1971, n. 50, p. 120). 4. Unity and Peace! The hope kindled by that historic encounter has lit up our journey in these last decades. Aware that the Christian world has suffered the tragedy of separation for centuries, our Predecessors and we ourselves have persevered in the "dialogue of charity", our gaze turned to that blessed, shining day on which it will be possible to communicate with the same cup of the precious Blood and the holy Body of the Lord (cf. Patriarch Athenagoras I, Address to Pope Paul VI [5 January 1964], ibid., n. 48, p. 109). The many ecclesial events that have punctuated these past years have put on firm foundations the commitment to brotherly love: a love which, in learning from past lessons, may be ready to forgive, more inclined to believe in good than in evil and intent first and foremost on complying with the Divine Redeemer and in being attracted and transformed by him (Address of Pope Paul VI to Patriarch Athenagoras I [6 January 1964], ibid., n. 49, p. 117). 5. Let us thank the Lord for the exemplary gestures of reciprocal love, participation and sharing that he has granted us to make; among them, it is only right to recall the Pope's Visit to the Ecumenical Patriarch Dimitrios in 1979, when the creation of the Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and all the Orthodox Churches was announced at the Phanar, a further step to sustain the "dialogue of truth" with the "dialogue of charity"; Patriarch Dimitrios' visit to Rome in 1987; our meeting in Rome on the feast of Sts Peter and Paul in 1995, when we prayed in St Peter's, despite the painful separation during the celebration of the Eucharistic Liturgy, since we cannot yet drink from the same chalice of the Lord. Then, more recently, there was the meeting at Assisi for the "Day of Prayer for Peace in the World", and the Common Declaration on Environmental Ethics for the Safeguard of Creation, signed on 10 June 2002 [in the context of the Fourth Symposium on Ecology: The Adriatic Sea: a Sea at Risk - Unity of Purpose]. 6. Despite our firm determination to journey on towards full communion, it would have been unrealistic not to expect obstacles of various kinds: doctrinal, first of all, but also the result of conditioning by a troubled history. In addition, the new problems which have emerged from the radical changes that have occurred in political and social structures have not failed to make themselves felt in relations between the Christian Churches. With the return to freedom of Christians in Central and Eastern Europe, old fears have also been reawakened, making dialogue difficult. Nonetheless, St Paul's exhortation to the Corinthians: let all things be done in charity, must always be vibrant within us and between us. 7. The Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and all the Orthodox Churches, created with so much hope, has marked our progress in recent years. It is still a suitable instrument for studying the ecclesiological and historical problems that are at the root of our difficulties, and for identifying hypothetical solutions to them. It is our duty to persevere in the important commitment to reopen the work as soon as possible. In examining the reciprocal initiatives of the offices of Rome and of Constantinople with this in view, we ask the Lord to sustain our determination, and to convince everyone of how essential it is to pursue the "dialogue of truth". 8. Our meeting in Rome today also enables us to face certain problems and misunderstandings that have recently surfaced. The long experience of the "dialogue of charity" comes to our aid precisely in these circumstances, so that difficulties can be faced serenely without slowing or clouding our progress on the journey we have undertaken towards full communion in Christ. 9. Before a world that is suffering every kind of division and imbalance, today's encounter is intended as a practical and forceful reminder of the importance for Christians and for the Churches to coexist in peace and harmony, in order to witness in agreement to the message of the Gospel in the most credible and convincing way possible. 10. In the special context of Europe, moving in the direction of higher forms of integration and expansion towards the East of the Continent, we thank the Lord for this positive development and express the hope that in this new situation, collaboration between Catholics and Orthodox may grow. There are so many challenges to face together in order to contribute to the good of society: to heal with love the scourge of terrorism, to instil a hope of peace, to help set aright the multitude of grievous conflicts; to restore to the European Continent the awareness of its Christian roots; to build true dialogue with Islam, since indifference and reciprocal ignorance can only give rise to diffidence and even hatred; to nourish an awareness of the sacred nature of human life; to work to ensure that science does not deny the divine spark that every human being receives with the gift of life; to collaborate so that our earth may not be disfigured and that Creation may preserve the beauty with which it has been endowed by God; but above all, to proclaim the Gospel Message with fresh vigour, showing contemporary men and women how the Gospel can help them rediscover themselves and to build a more human world. 11. Let us pray to the Lord to give peace to the Church and to the world, and to imbue our journey towards full communion with the wisdom of his Spirit, "ut unum in Christo simus" [so that we may be one in Christ]. From the Vatican, 29 June 2004
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
We can't compromise the Ancient Faith to appease Rome however.
@sonialorris7537
@sonialorris7537 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria I am just quoting what the POPE and YOUR PATRIARCH signed. And I have other documents too... It's weird how your leaders "compromise" and you don't accept they work guided by the Holy Spirit 🙄
@sonialorris7537
@sonialorris7537 3 жыл бұрын
Here you go another statement. Blame your Patriarchs, then. JOINT CATHOLIC-ORTHODOX DECLARATION OF HIS HOLINESS POPE PAUL VI AND THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH ATHENAGORAS I December 7, 1965 Following is the text of the joint Catholic-Orthodox declaration, approved by Pope Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras I of Constantinople, read simultaneously (Dec. 7) at a public meeting of the ecumenical council in Rome and at a special ceremony in Istanbul. The declaration concerns the Catholic-Orthodox exchange of excommunications in 1054. 1. Grateful to God, who mercifully favored them with a fraternal meeting at those holy places where the mystery of salvation was accomplished through the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and where the Church was born through the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I have not lost sight of the determination each then felt to omit nothing thereafter which charity might inspire and which could facilitate the development of the fraternal relations thus taken up between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church of Constantinople. They are persuaded that in acting this way, they are responding to the call of that divine grace which today is leading the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, as well as all Christians, to overcome their differences in order to be again "one" as the Lord Jesus asked of His Father for them. 2. Among the obstacles along the road of the development of these fraternal relations of confidence and esteem, there is the memory of the decisions, actions and painful incidents which in 1054 resulted in the sentence of excommunication leveled against the Patriarch Michael Cerularius and two other persons by the legate of the Roman See under the leadership of Cardinal Humbertus, legates who then became the object of a similar sentence pronounced by the patriarch and the Synod of Constantinople. 3. One cannot pretend that these events were not what they were during this very troubled period of history. Today, however, they have been judged more fairly and serenely. Thus it is important to recognize the excesses which accompanied them and later led to consequences which, insofar as we can judge, went much further than their authors had intended and foreseen. They had directed their censures against the persons concerned and not the Churches. These censures were not intended to break ecclesiastical communion between the Sees of Rome and Constantinople. 4. Since they are certain that they express the common desire for justice and the unanimous sentiment of charity which moves the faithful, and since they recall the command of the Lord: "If you are offering your gift at the altar, and there remember that your brethren has something against you, leave your gift before the altar and go first be reconciled to your brother" (Matt. 5:23-24), Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I with his synod, in common agreement, declare that: A. They regret the offensive words, the reproaches without foundation, and the reprehensible gestures which, on both sides, have marked or accompanied the sad events of this period. B. They likewise regret and remove both from memory and from the midst of the Church the sentences of excommunication which followed these events, the memory of which has influenced actions up to our day and has hindered closer relations in charity; and they commit these excommunications to oblivion. C. Finally, they deplore the preceding and later vexing events which, under the influence of various factors-among which, lack of understanding and mutual trust-eventually led to the effective rupture of ecclesiastical communion. 5. Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I with his synod realize that this gesture of justice and mutual pardon is not sufficient to end both old and more recent differences between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church. Through the action of the Holy Spirit those differences will be overcome through cleansing of hearts, through regret for historical wrongs, and through an efficacious determination to arrive at a common understanding and expression of the faith of the Apostles and its demands. They hope, nevertheless, that this act will be pleasing to God, who is prompt to pardon us when we pardon each other. They hope that the whole Christian world, especially the entire Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church will appreciate this gesture as an expression of a sincere desire shared in common for reconciliation, and as an invitation to follow out in a spirit of trust, esteem and mutual charity the dialogue which, with Gods help, will lead to living together again, for the greater good of souls and the coming of the kingdom of God, in that full communion of faith, fraternal accord and sacramental life which existed among them during the first thousand years of the life of the Church.
@sonialorris7537
@sonialorris7537 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria... The Basis is... We are not losing anything if we admit we have some different understanding, but we are brethens in Christ. That's what they declare... Apparently these declarations have got no meaning for some radical orthodox, but for us catholics certainly have.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@sonialorris7537 I'm not under the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The Holy Spirit had no hand in that and we still remain apart.
@adoseoftheosis
@adoseoftheosis 3 жыл бұрын
@Gospel Simplicity you should reach out to John Maddex from Ancient Faith Radio for an interview. You likely already know about him, but he used to be attached to Moody, running their radio stations.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
That could be fun!
@jaqian
@jaqian 3 жыл бұрын
It is possible for Orthodox and Catholics to be in communion (not necessarily unified), treat the Pope as just another Patriarch.
@masterchief8179
@masterchief8179 3 жыл бұрын
Which Patriarch could write to an Ecumenical Council what Pope St Leo the Great wrote at Chalcedon (451) and not be anathematized, but actually be effusively saluted? Which Patriarch could send someone in his name to speak like Phillip the legate of Pope St Celestine spoke in Ephesus (431)? Which Patriarch was ever called for ratification of the decisions of Ecumenical Councils? Which one of the Patriarchs was received the mission of ratification like Pope St Damasus was in the First Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (Second Ecumenical, 381) or Popes St Agatho and St Leo II were in the Third Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (Sixth Ecumenical, 680-681), for example? Which Patriarch received letters from the Byzantine Emperors calling him the visible authority of the whole Church? Which Patriarch was acclaimed by a Byzantine Emperor as the Supreme Pastor of the Church and Successor of St Peter as Pope St Hormisdas was called by Emperor Justin? Which Patriarch was acclaimed by Byzantine Emperor Justinian I (considered the greatest of all times in importance) saying he wouldn’t allow the Eastern Districts to be out of unity with the See of this supposed patriarchate and to reject that it is undoubtedly the Head of all the universal Churches, a thing that happened to Pope John II? As in the Bible, Peter speaks for himself of course but he is the ONLY Apostle who CAN speak on behalf of his brothers. All other Apostle can only speak for himself, not for the whole Apostolic collegiate. More than that, I ask: which Patriarch, when teaching in his very episcopal authority, was acclaimed in all of the history of the Church as if Peter spoke through him, like Popes St Leo the Great in Chalcedon (451) and St Agatho in 3rd Constantinople (680-681) (and many more exemplars)? Not even the Patriarch of Antioch, who was sometimes honored as a “Petrine See” due to the historical foundation by St Peter (not even one of the very FIVE current Patriarchs of Antioch that are existent today, please Google it). Not a single one, I must emphatically say. Which Patriarch from a city politically vanished and destroyed could demand the Byzantine Emperor and the Eastern Bishops to sign a Formula of Faith, indeed signed and confessed, like Pope St Hormisdas did in the early 500s, and gather the acceptance of the Patriarchs (until more than 300 years later, during the Photian schism, a non-contemporary version came to sustain that the Formula was accepted, except in the part of the Petrine authority)? Brother, I am not saying things are crystal clear in ecclesiology and I am pretty sure doctrinal development took place just as the ecclesial embodiment would grow from being as little as the mustard see to become as big as the largest of the trees. Even so, I humbly think Eastern Orthodoxy’s ecclesiology is counter-historical and do not have solid parallels in the Sacred Scriptures (I agree with all Fr pointed is the Eucharistic ecclesiology, that’s entirely correct and it has the “soul” of St Ignatius of Antioch ecclesiology). It could be a different solution: only this one would be undoubtedly innovative. I sincerely think the path should be the recognition of the “autonomic status” (not autocephaly, actually the Eastern Orthodox position, if it implies what they defend in their ecclesiology) of broader ‘sui iuris’ churches and maybe develop a bit further the concept of descentralization and autonomy - further than the current canonical state of the “sui iuris” churches - for the hypothetical new reality. Maybe an intermediate position between the autonomous churches (“sui iuris”) in full communion with the Successor of St Peter and the so-called autocephalous churches of Eastern Orthodoxy. PS: I can give quotations, of course. PS(2): I am all in favor of unity and have nothing but huge respect and love for our EOs brothers (even those who act as aggressors and hatefully towards us).
@alypius9409
@alypius9409 3 жыл бұрын
@@masterchief8179 tl;Dr St Leo Popes tome was corrected to St Cyril's Christology, this is an age old drag of an excuse for papal supremacy. Nowhere in the council, and no where in the acts or minutes of the council. A St with correct Christology what was amended nothing else.
@masterchief8179
@masterchief8179 3 жыл бұрын
@@alypius9409 Actually it was St Cyril of Alexandria’s writings that were rightfully interpreted in settlement at the very Tome to St Flavian, written by the Pope to the Patriarch of Constantinople. That’s exactly the context of “Robber Council” of Ephesus in 449 - a name given by Pope St Leo the Great, by the way, that was endorsed in all the Chalcedonian East - in which Dioscorus, the Patriarch/Pope of Alexandria, dared to proclaim the anti-Chalcedonian Christology claiming EXACTLY to be using the teachings of his fellow countryman St Cyril of Alexandria, stressing out the radical opposition to Nestorianism. For Oriental Orthodoxy (specially the Coptic) so archetypal was this case that the very Patriarch of Alexandria, condemned as a heretic by Pope St Leo the Great and THEN by the Council of Chalcedon was proclaimed a canonized Oriental Orthodox (Pre-Chalcedonian) saint under the suggestive name “Pope St Dioscorus the Great”, what many understood to a mimetic reference to St Leo, Pope of Rome, who was in his lifetime regarded as a great governor and a monumental theologian and was the archenemy of Dioscorus. So I think your interpretation of the events surrounding Pope St Leo the Great in the Holy Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon is quite out of compass. I know the strange position popularized among Eastern Orthodoxy “pop apologetics”, according to which the clear dogmatic proclamations of St Leo the Great (he even EXPLICITLY, in the 400s!, vindicated to speak on behalf of the authority of St Peter to the WORLD in his proclamations!) only became dogmatic after passing the “Cyrillene Test” from which the praises were allegedly nothing more than a “congratulatory compliment” to someone who has had it all rightly described, not to a Pope exercising authority when he even says he is doing so as the Successor of St Peter. But this audacious theory is conveniently very “ex post facto” and it is DENIED simply by reading the texts, knowing the words used and understanding the structure of the very documents written by Pope St Leo the Great and the responses of the Council Fathers in Chalcedon in light of the tragedies of the “Robbe Council” of 449 (just for you to know: St Flavian of Constantinople was even beaten up to death during that infamous illegitimate council and the Robber Council refused to read the papal “Tomus ad Flavianus” in order to preserve Dioscorus’ position). To say St Cyril “corrected” Leo’s Christology is to have the curious capacity to understand events exactly as if they were inside out. If you want a nice description coming from an Eastern Orthodox brilliant mind, one of the brightest philosophers and theologian of the world in the late 19th and early 20th century, I recommend Vladimir Soloviev(ov)’s _”Russia and the Universal Church”._ There is an entire CHAPTER about St Leo and the Council of Chalcedon in that phenomenal book and Soloviev(ov) pretty much analyzed the documents from Leo and the responses of the Council Fathers step by step. I strongly recommend you get better informed. Good readings, my friend!
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
RCs would reject it. They would also have to do a lot more than just demote the Pope.
@MrWesford
@MrWesford 3 жыл бұрын
The pope is literally just another bishop, the pope and RCs would have to be okay with giving up the supremacy that they’ve taken for themselves.
@trupela
@trupela 3 жыл бұрын
“If we do our part, he [God] will do his part“ No, God is always already faithful, whether or not we do our part.
@thekingofsomewhere
@thekingofsomewhere 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, but if we do not cooperate with God, we mess ourselves up. I think that's the point.
@trupela
@trupela 3 жыл бұрын
@@thekingofsomewhere if that was his point then he should have said that. He didn’t. Certainly our participation with God matters. But the extent of our participation does not determine God’s. God is always already doing all that God can do. That is what Love does.
@trupela
@trupela 3 жыл бұрын
‘Our very nothingness without God makes our very presence to be the presence of God’ James Finley
@lionheart5078
@lionheart5078 Жыл бұрын
Catholics would absolutely agree with the fact that every diocese is the entire church there as well. Every Bishop is also Peter in his own diocese. The RCC literally speaks about diocese and Bishops in this way. The Roman pope has however a unifying characteristic in his chair and has a unique position as the direct successor of Peter. He serves as a practical pillar of unity in the church and without him, I think as Orthodoxy very well attest to today, there is no clear unity and only a loose confederation of Churches that have lost the ability to really teach definitively. Also from my understanding presbyters or priests only came into existence because Bishops practically couldnt be everywhere essentially. Maybe im wrong but from my understanding all powers that priests have are endowed upon them by their one bishop. Also in the early church even in the east it was originally only the Bishop who christmated.
@bentenmuckensturm6260
@bentenmuckensturm6260 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Austin, Great video, Fr. Laurent seems genuinely concerned about the topic of reunion and as a Catholic I find that deeply compelling. Have you considered having a dialogue with Michael from R&T to possibly push back on some of the arguments put forward by some of the Orthodox guests you’ve had on the show regarding the Papacy and Rome’s primacy? I think it could be a fruitful discussion since he was once a convert from Catholicism to Orthodoxy and has since (2016ish I believe) come back to the Catholic faith. God bless, Benten
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
I’d consider it, but I’ve already had him on
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 3 жыл бұрын
Pope John Paul II contacted both Orthodox Sts. Paisios and Porphyrios in an attempt to meet with him to further increase ecumenical development between east and west, one of the hallmarks of his reign. Guided by the Holy Spirit, both Saints refused with the same answer, even though they had no communication with one another: "The Pope continues to demonstrate egotism, pride and the delusions of Papism and wishes to subject us. He does not believe we have the truth. There is no need for us to go, we can help the situation better with our prayers"
@ignatiusl.7478
@ignatiusl.7478 3 жыл бұрын
Amen!
@vituzui9070
@vituzui9070 3 жыл бұрын
Well if this is true, their response seems to show more egotism and paranoia than anything else. Yes, the pope believes the Catholic Church is the true Church, just like they believe the Orthodox Church is the true Church. There is nothing prideful there. The pope doesn't believe in the claims of the papacy because of pride or egotism, but simply because he was educated as a Catholic, like most other Catholics. The response of Paisios and Porphyrios show how much the Orthodox are willing to judge the souls of others, and to ascribe them imaginary vices. The pope called them in order to increase the friendship and to decrease the acrimony between East and West, not to "subject" them. Ironically, the acrimonious response of Paisios and Porphyrios show that the pope was right to think that those meetings were needed.
@Leo-uq6jp
@Leo-uq6jp 3 жыл бұрын
@@vituzui9070 Both Saints had more discernment than any one in this comment section probably will ever have, their response was founded in truth and piety
@George-ur8ow
@George-ur8ow 3 жыл бұрын
@@vituzui9070 "The response of these Saints shows how much the Orthodox judge the souls of others". If you knew anything about these Saints, you would not have written what you had. In another "twist of irony", which seemed to be your focus, you yourself judged not only these very Saints, but, incredibly, all of Orthodoxy. These Saints knew, and Orthodoxy maintains that the Bishop of Rome must repent. He is not the vicar of Christ, nor is he infallible ex Cathedra. He is the Bishop of Rome. A brief review of history should clearly show the evolution of the position. The Papacy today is a far cry from the Papacy of the 1700 A.D., as it is from 1200 A.D, 900 A.D., 700 A.D and so on... If one is unsure concerning this issue, the fact that a Pope has been declared a heretic by an ecumenical council pre-schism should put the issue to bed pretty easily. Hereticism and infallibility go together like oil and water.
@Fasolislithuan
@Fasolislithuan 3 жыл бұрын
That's answer says loudly. Even they use a derogatory, pejorative term (Papism). Who is full of pride? I see more open minds and humbleness in some protestants people than in those orthodox "saints"
@lupinthe4th400
@lupinthe4th400 3 жыл бұрын
I am not familar with Fr. Laurent Cleenewerck's work. Looking forward to this video.
@lupinthe4th400
@lupinthe4th400 3 жыл бұрын
@@frcaseycole4135 I highly doubt that Fr. Josiah Trenham has commented here. It's especially weird that he supposedly registered on KZfaq only yesterday. Go back to the shadow from whence you came, troll! EDIT: Now the troll that deleted its spam message has changed its name to "Fr Casey Cole". Beware.
@David-pf9xe
@David-pf9xe 2 жыл бұрын
I would say both Churches need to address the problems within themselves before a real dialogue could ever begin. Constantinople needs to renounce it's meddling in the Ukraine. The Vatican II Church needs to renounce it's liturgical reforms, and hippie feel good teachings.
@koppite9600
@koppite9600 2 жыл бұрын
The Church was given a leader to bind and loose, if you're not with the Pope then your loss
@csterett
@csterett 3 жыл бұрын
It almost seemed as if he were saying that you need someone with final authority (like the Pope) to resolve disagreements. He did comment on the dispute between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ukraine Orthodox Church.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
The "Orthodox Church" of Ukraine (OCU, not to be confused with the UOC under Met. Onuphry) isn't recognized except by one or two Patriarch and it was also created against Canons and its clergy never recanted their apostasy which prevents one from becoming Orthodox or re-entering communion. Another words the OCU has no ordained clergy.
@MrWesford
@MrWesford 3 жыл бұрын
The fact that the Orthodox Church has survived nearly 1,000 years after The Pope went apostate shows that we don’t need Papal Supremacy.
@csterett
@csterett 3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyMaria You've made a case for the Papacy. The fact that you are saying that there are two churches in the Ukraine which claim the title of "Orthodox" and that one is recognized by some Patriarchs and not others show the need for a final authority. That would be like the Archdiocese of New York not recognizing the Archdiocese of Chicago.
@csterett
@csterett 3 жыл бұрын
@@MrWesford Yes, Orthodoxy has survived for 1,000 years without Papal Supremacy, but there are problems that they can't come to a consensus on. There is no final authority to resolve the issue.
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
@@csterett Not really. I mean at least we're not as screwed up as the Roman confession.
@flisom
@flisom 3 жыл бұрын
Ecumenism’s goal is to simply unite everyone who identifies as Christian for the benefit of our created world. Christ’s catholic (universal) Church exists today and is unified. Christian’s just need to join that Church. Ecumenism is the wide gate to destruction. We should choose the narrow and difficult gate that leads to life.
@notme214
@notme214 Жыл бұрын
32:00
@rjward1775
@rjward1775 3 жыл бұрын
We all pray that the Church can breathe with both lungs again.
@GospelSimplicity
@GospelSimplicity 3 жыл бұрын
Amen
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
The Church lacks nothing.
@SLVBULL
@SLVBULL 2 жыл бұрын
If orthodoxy is the true church which I believe it is how can it then bend and conform to accommodate the heretics as the saints called them. It's about coming back into the orthodox fold one would think. Catholics and orthodox are miles apart in almost every aspect that they don't resemble each other anymore. This is a huge problem.
@fork407
@fork407 3 жыл бұрын
Sounds good, doesn't work. Let me explain the real Orthodox position from my understanding. We Orthodox care very deeply about how we manifest our faith and the Catholics (which are my brothers and have nothing against them) have diverged too much from the traditions, rituals, dogma. Think of it like a divorced couple who have been divorced for 20 years. While one has tried to remain the same as the day they married, the other has gone too far off. I for one, and everyone I know will never accept the Catholics in their current ways. They have to change many many things to consider even thinking about remarrying. One of us has to change and it won't be the Orthodox. There's a joke going around saying "How many Orthodox do you need to change a lightbulb?" and the answer is "Change? We never change".
@helenoce5007
@helenoce5007 3 жыл бұрын
Can you see that's why the body of Christ is wounded constantly???😔😔😔
@LadyMaria
@LadyMaria 3 жыл бұрын
We do not believe in an invisible church. We believe the Body of Christ is the Orthodox Church.
@alyoshaty8823
@alyoshaty8823 3 жыл бұрын
O R T H O D O X R I S I N G
A biblical theology of true worship (w/ Dr. Edith Humphrey)
1:09:43
Gospel Simplicity
Рет қаралды 18 М.
A clash of kindness and indifference #shorts
00:17
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 107 МЛН
КАК ДУМАЕТЕ КТО ВЫЙГРАЕТ😂
00:29
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
An Orthodox Priest and Catholic Apologist Talk about the Papacy
1:30:44
Gospel Simplicity
Рет қаралды 25 М.
What Did Paul Mean by "Works of the Law"? (w/ Dr. Matthew J. Thomas)
1:03:31
Why This Atheist Philosopher Converted to Eastern Orthodoxy
56:51
Capturing Christianity
Рет қаралды 14 М.
What is the Catholic Magisterium and is it Biblical? (w/ Michael Lofton)
1:35:40
Eastern Catholicism w/ Sr. Natalia
2:42:50
Pints With Aquinas
Рет қаралды 253 М.
Luther, the Reformation, and the Solas (w/ Dr. Jordan B. Cooper)
52:45
Gospel Simplicity
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Learning to Pray the Ignatian Examen (w/ Fr. Mark Thibodeaux)
58:04
Gospel Simplicity
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Детство злой тётки 😂 #shorts
0:31
Julia Fun
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Playing hide and seek with my dog 🐶
0:25
Zach King
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
The FAST and FURIOUS Table Hack 😱
0:29
LosWagners ENG
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Роналду совсем другой! 😱
0:45
КиноСклад
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Толстый солдат всем отомстил #shorts
1:00
Курение вредит здоровью
0:28
ЮРИЧ
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН