I agree

Josey wales would like a word with you

Reginald Wilson no shot

John Knoneborg Clint directed that too 🤣

ChunkyFXDLS you act like I don’t know that, that was my point

John Knoneborg no shit, it was a comment not an ‘act’ 🙄

He looks young af considering his age. Amazing genetics

He's a 63 years young here...

And he will be

Now he is 91 😎

@@smoothhitman1594 92 almost

Asshole thst joked about indigenous native amerucans

93

Now he is 93

@When you read the comments I will be there . whatd you think its actually pretty cool

Yet every single nominee was a man

@@dirtyheck1860 > Yet every single nominee was a man Maybe the five best directors that year were all men...

@@jonaskoelker That year maybe... But the Academy has often snubbed deserving women directors like Kathryn Bigelow (Zero Dark Thirty), Barbra Streisand (Yentl), Greta Gerwig (Little Women), Lulu Wang (The Farewell), Celine Sciamma (Portrait of a Lady on Fire) and many more

@@aameyadevansh4246 By "snubbed" I assume you mean that there weren't other directors who were more deserving who got nominated ahead/instead of those particular women (whose work I don't know)-but rather, that the work of the women you point to was unjustly un(der)-nominated because of gender. Is that something you can substantiate? Of course, if by "snubbed" you mean simply that they were not nominated, and that this is unjust, then a just world has at most five female directors each year, otherwise at least one of them has to be snubbed-and similarly at most five actresses, visual effect artists, composers, etc.; surely this is not the world you want. And it gets even worse: if it's unjust to snub women its unjust to snub men, so the total number of men plus women in each category has to be such that everyone gets nominated. Also, do you happen to know the gender composition of the set of top directors? If it's 90%/10% we would expect an all-male set of 5 nominees every 6 times out of 10 just by chance alone (or 59.05/100 to be exact).

Sadly 😔 that would have Been awesome 👍

He'd have been perfect as English Bob.

Well, he can almost make a Christopher Lee biopic and it would be close enough.

Morgan Freeman looked thrilled for him which was great to see.

He is far past the previous record for oldest working Hollywood director, which was George Cukor, who worked up to the age of 83. Of course, the oldest working director ever was Manoel de Oliveira, who worked up until his death at the age of 106 in 2015... yet, seeing how Clint just keeps going, he may very well be able to beat that.

Guilherme Marques not quite

What the hell? This was the most random comment I ever read in my life xD I can't stop laughing tff xDDDDD

great

i thought it was aniston at first glance, glad someone pointed that out

I get confused every time I see those two.

savage

He might live for another 15 years and make 5 more films. Guy still works out almost every day.

Why be sad? They have had great lives and lived for a long long time. They should be celebrated.

I admire Gene Hackman for retiring when he did. Most actors keep going for too long and it just becomes embarrassing. But guys like Hackman, Nicholson and Connery knew when to call it quits and bowed out with class.

The best in Hollywood are gone or near gone. There is a reason it was called the golden age of Hollywood. Nothing today comes close to the class and glamour of Hollywood back in the day. 🎬

LIES! LIES, I SAY!

can't agree

yep its was.

Yes thats true milloin was a average movie

I mean sure but thats like saying godfather part 2 is better than godfather part 1?

I agree the Unforgiven is to some extend a deconstruction. However, the spaghetti westerns was all about the dream of the west, the bad guys getting their come-uppance, the invincible, stoic, opportunistic but ultimately righteous ideal of man that every boy at some point aspires to be. The man with no name was a (nigh cartoonic) epithome of a hero, flawed but with his principles intact. Unforgiven was depicting reality. This isn't the man with no name. It's the bleak story of trying to bury the monster inside which is only waiting for the right time to reveal that a killer will always be a killer. And that given the proper circumstances, that monster could be anyone. There's no redemption, only living in denial to then finally circle back to what you really are. Killing another killer (and a handful of men who probably was subservient to one killer out of fear, only to die at another one's hand) for a skewed sense of justice is a very debatable morale. To me the main message of Unforgiven is something along these lines: Change takes something bigger than yourself and might not be change but just a mask if you don't see yourself for what you are.

👏

Agreed.

Cute: but beautiful?

Beutiful, beutiful

@@rahlohmcdonogh4855 No doubt about it, beautiful. Check out vintage photo of her from the 1960s.