Hallo

Guys korbin and ricks pls react new malayalm trailer chaveer

Exactly! It was very clever

Yess

​​​@@TheLibrarianOG1 honestly, the movie would have lost half of its comedic value if that hadn't been done because the the strong point of this movie is the dialogues.

@@starsign0805watched in India where there were no subtitles at all, movie still held up imo

@@miniclip0703 and you're not a Hindi speaker?

Yes as a Bengali I can confirm, agree with this comment. Such families do still exist out there.

Exactly my thought.. he seemed like a kid who has been introduced to Bollywood films for the first time.. watching with the same excitement and enthusiasm we did as kids.. it’s so so refreshing!

Honestly, that was a brilliant decision 😂

To dancing along to song in the middle of the movie 😂

Bcs nobody is enjoying watching Dharma production movies 😂

From 3 iditos to complaining about cut short songs in ps 1😂😂😂

I didn't watch their review, but let me guess it was Rick who talked about the negatives mostly, right?

@@ayanchoudhury6697 yeah and they were mainly baseless and him being ignorant about what bengali stereotypes are even though there was a bengali writer onboard for this film And he took over the whole review and korbin barely said much

Same here hehe. Had an unexpectedly fun time with this one, barring some cringe parts of course 😂

Omg me toooooo !!! Watched it 3 times in oz and I’m not even Indian but darn I love this movie!!!!

wait what?

I mean if barbie can go, so can this.

K3G and KKHH????!!!

Re reviewed it with us originally

What?? He was the one who made My Name Is Khan. Even in K3G, he portrayed the parents/Amitabh bachchan as TOXIC and made him apologise to Kajol and SRK at the end of the movie after he realised his mistakes. Where did he portray parents as gods? And in K3G, the portrayal of women was anything but disrespectful as SRK stood by his wife and never compromised. Kajol was shown as the bubbly loud mouthed girl. Same for MNIK where Mandira was a strong independent woman and same goes for ADHM where Anushka rejected Ranbir and made her own decisions. And the funniest thing is you are telling that he has obsession with white skin, when KKHH, K3G, KANK, MNIK all featured dark skinned women like Kajol and Rani. And he shot his movies outside India because he was the type of filmmaker to make movies for NRI's and foreigners apart from Indians, thats why K3G is the most popular bollywood movie overseas. And there is nothing wrong with that. Every filmmaker has a unique style of his own like Bhansali who always makes period films. Every thing you criticized is non existent in KJO films

@@christina5266 MNIK, ADHM is not one of his earlier movies that I saw as a kid. Also, they are a departure from the Big Bollywood style too. What I was referring to was Kabhi Khushi Kabhi Gam, Kuch Kuch Hota hai , etc. And yes, Amitabh Bachchan's character did apologize and yet he gaslighted his child. And Jaya forgave him easily. That's the problem. Additionally, sharukh did like this bubby girl Kajol after he got married and the movie moves to London, there are sequences of sharukh being extremely irritable with Kajal in the morning sequence and also in the song 'Bole Chudiya' , he actually tries to stop her from dancing. There were no dialogues to portray this, it was expressed through the body language. And more importantly, what's with getting a woman married as soon as her dad dies, like literally on the same day?! Like a woman always needs a male guardian in a married form/ or a dad or brother to exist in this world. Just being there emotionally for her was not enough. It did affect me as a child and dislike the movies. Rocky Aur Rani was a departure because the toxicity of the Jaya character and his son was not addressed at the end, it was addressed from the beginning and Rocky's mom did NOT forgive her husband easily. Rocky was respectful in words and body language with Rani throughout. That's the difference.

@@pritharoychowdhury5020 the problem you have with K3G doesn't make sense because the movie shows the exact opposite of it. Amitabh is shown rude, condescending and elitist since the beginning and its not portrayed in a good light, he was negative from the start. He gaslighted his child, sure but did they glorify it?? You are saying that movies should not show bad people at all?? Portraying people negatively isn't the problem, glorifying them is, k3g didn't do it at all, Amitabh was hated by Hrithik, Jaya and his mother in those 10 years. Jaya forgave him because at the end he was genuinely remorseful and rectified his mistakes. And what could Jaya do?? They were in last stages of their life lol, you wanted divorce between them? Amitabh went through redemption arc and thats what matters. And he was NOWHERE NEAR AS BAD AS TIJORI. Tijori was a misogynist who abused women and ruined their lives. Amitabh was far better than him in every way. So comparing them is plain weird. And SRK was shown extremely irritable in the morning because Kajol was being VERY loud, any normal person even people who are loud(like me) find such voices annoying in the morning because they were sleeping there. If you see the other scenes and deleted scenes, they have a very loving and healthy relationship. And the woman getting married on the same day was indeed very dramatic, and unnecessary. However telling that a woman in her situation needs no guardian is unrealistic ad delusional. Stop trying to see everything from the privileged lens of the society. Having guardians is never a bad thing. And while every woman definitely doesn't need a man to survive, Kajol needed the help. Kajol was a lower middle class woman with no support other than her father, after he died, she had no one left and she lost basically everything. Some people can never grasp the fact some people do in fact need help and support, and there is NOTHING wrong with it. Not every girl needs to be a boss girl who believes she needs no man. SRK was going to marry her anyways, he just sped up the process(which was absurd, that i agree with). Just being there for her "emotionally"?? Are you serious lol? How? Please explain? With what right will he support her "emotionally"?

@@pritharoychowdhury5020 While Rocky might have been respectful throughout, Rani wasn't. She berated him multiple times and led him on and gaslighted him. So its fine when Rani does it because she is a woman, but SRK feeling irritated because Kajol was singing loudly while he was trying to sleep is toxic? Be for real

@@christina5266 For starters, there is no need to take it so personally. I respect your opinion and different people perceive different things differently depending on the age, circumstances around them and more and you and I have perceived it differently . And no, I don't think gaslighting anyone is the right way to go but when you grow up in families where there has been deaths, traumas due to deeply abusive behaviour of men (which may include your own parents, masis, etc) and you grow up seeing men gaslighting their wives everyday, seeing even traces of that on screen as normal behaviour does leave a negative impact on you. And no, I never said she didn't need him, all I said he could have been her partner (boyfriend) and marriage was not necessary at that moment, maybe in a few months or a year would have been completely fine and normal. And yes, not all women need to be boss ladies, neither am I one. I very much acknowledge that in many spheres of life, I and my partner are dependent on each other and that's fine, I agree. Also, about the parents part, I did not perceive it similarly. Kajol kept wishing for her father in law's ashirvaad though he was mean to her, and even sneakily takes it. That to me, was unnecessary. I always believe that when people are toxic , regardless of age, they automatically lose respect of people, regardless of gender. They are no longer deserving of any sign of respect unless they acknowledge their mistake. Also, I put Amitabh and Tojori on a same scale of misbehaviour. Atleast Tijori's is on the face, it's not subtle, it's easier to identify. Amitabh's one is subtle , it is far difficult to fight against subtle dominating egoistic behaviour. It triggered the 5-6 year old in me navigating this world, and it's perfectly fine if you saw it differently. For example, many many people find Sooraj Barjatiya's movies even more cringe but I didn't, because mean behaviour always triggered me more than gender roles, for personal reasons.

I think he was trying to convey the relevance as to why a male kathak dancer was being laughed at later in the movie, I believe.

Pass me that meth you're on my broski

According to you

😂