No video

Jensen's Inequality proof

  Рет қаралды 61,790

Ox educ

Ox educ

Күн бұрын

For more information on econometrics and Bayesian statistics, see: ben-lambert.com/

Пікірлер: 37
@mayankjangid1543
@mayankjangid1543 3 жыл бұрын
Finally got the intuitive reasoning of the inequality ! Thank you so much sir!
@baqerjawadal-lawati8473
@baqerjawadal-lawati8473 2 жыл бұрын
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. Thank you for showing that.
@Issara86
@Issara86 7 жыл бұрын
All of a sudden utility maximization under uncertainty makes so much more sense now. Thank you good sir.
@prestonhansen49
@prestonhansen49 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks a bunch for the video, this is a lot easier to follow and less notation heavy than the proofs from my course!
@solfeinberg437
@solfeinberg437 5 жыл бұрын
So clear, such an efficient proof - thank you for informing me and respecting my time and intelligence. Bravo!
@jacobschuster4857
@jacobschuster4857 Жыл бұрын
Such a clean and intuitive way of proving this. Thanks!
@ericarcherman9955
@ericarcherman9955 9 ай бұрын
Great video here! Thanks!
@user-tl8xb8ks6s
@user-tl8xb8ks6s 5 жыл бұрын
Doesn't L[E(x)]=g(E(x)) only hold if the x is the particular point where g(x) and L(x) meet? Generally, L[E(x)]=
@ericzhang7658
@ericzhang7658 5 жыл бұрын
L[E(x)] is defined such that it is tangent to the function g at g[E(x)]
@marofe
@marofe 4 жыл бұрын
Actually it is correct! The proof relies on the convexity inequality, but you also can prove by a tangent plane if you choose L(x)=g(E(x))+g'(E(x))(x-E(x)). thus, as g(x)>=L(x) for all x we got that E(g(x)) >= g(E(x)) for all x.
@tristanseow2970
@tristanseow2970 3 жыл бұрын
L[E(X)] and g(E(X)) are both constants, for a random variable X, thus they should be equal to each other
@dinaashraf9199
@dinaashraf9199 5 жыл бұрын
That's really informative and easy to be understood. Thank you.
@emrglr6963
@emrglr6963 Жыл бұрын
great way of proving this, thank you!
@pinkability5547
@pinkability5547 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. It is much easier than I thought :))
@TheRyry97
@TheRyry97 9 жыл бұрын
This is great. Never seen Jensen's proved in this manner before.
@deductionism
@deductionism 9 жыл бұрын
Ryan Tamburrino It is proven in exactly the same manner at the book A First Look at Rigorous Probability Theory by Jeffrey Rosenthal
@samuelbarham8483
@samuelbarham8483 4 жыл бұрын
Oh that's such a beautiful proof.
@andrewrochman8859
@andrewrochman8859 4 жыл бұрын
how cool it is i can actually find minimum values of trigonometric functions in a triangle by using jensons inequality
@yaminireddy5157
@yaminireddy5157 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, you can but as trig functions are periodic, and triangle angles have a condition like at max only one obtuse angle/right angle, you should be very careful as some angles may land on the convex part while others concave!
@krstev29
@krstev29 Ай бұрын
Do you know how complex is the induction proof?
@activision4170
@activision4170 4 ай бұрын
Would this also imply the reverse is true for a concave function? I.e., g(E(x)) > E[g(x)] ?
@lazarbeic1131
@lazarbeic1131 3 жыл бұрын
Very smooth, great!
@vidajohn2199
@vidajohn2199 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you. This is very clear.
@iamoo
@iamoo 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Couldn't understand explanations from the Blitzstein's book..
@zihadazad
@zihadazad 7 жыл бұрын
Nassim Nicholas Taleb Brought me here
@sucim
@sucim 5 жыл бұрын
How did that come about?
@hanjunkim9298
@hanjunkim9298 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@barosderiche645
@barosderiche645 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks but not rigorous. A convex function is not necessarily differentiable. Thus there may not exist a tangent line at all.
@giorgioyoung102
@giorgioyoung102 5 жыл бұрын
it's differentiable at all but finitely many points, so not such a big lie
@user-yc3yj5nn3z
@user-yc3yj5nn3z 7 жыл бұрын
thank you~
@dorian9636
@dorian9636 4 жыл бұрын
awesome
@Tomvik1975
@Tomvik1975 4 жыл бұрын
6
@kaidongwei4406
@kaidongwei4406 5 жыл бұрын
doesnt make sense
@kaidongwei4406
@kaidongwei4406 5 жыл бұрын
I will use it anyway since all of u say it is right
@kaidongwei4406
@kaidongwei4406 5 жыл бұрын
bad proof
@itstotallydope
@itstotallydope 5 жыл бұрын
@@kaidongwei4406 HAHAHHA which part do u not understand
@ansonngpersonalgoogleaccou5104
@ansonngpersonalgoogleaccou5104 5 жыл бұрын
@@itstotallydope his life
The intuition behind Jensen's Inequality
6:08
Ox educ
Рет қаралды 49 М.
Jensen's Inequality
6:57
Mutual Information
Рет қаралды 26 М.
黑天使遇到什么了?#short #angel #clown
00:34
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
Matching Picture Challenge with Alfredo Larin's family! 👍
00:37
BigSchool
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
Секрет фокусника! #shorts
00:15
Роман Magic
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
41 - Proof: Gamma prior is conjugate to Poisson likelihood
8:33
Proving Jensen's Inequality
14:20
Brunei Math Club
Рет қаралды 1,1 М.
75   method of moments   normal distribution
7:48
Ox educ
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Jensen's Inequality : Data Science Basics
18:04
ritvikmath
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Understanding Quasiconcave and Quasiconvex Functions
22:54
Byte Buzz
Рет қаралды 36 М.
78   method of moments   linear regression
6:34
Ox educ
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Jensen's Inequality | A physical proof | visual proof
11:39
Cheenta Academy for Olympiad & Research
Рет қаралды 3,7 М.
How Bayes Theorem works
25:09
Brandon Rohrer
Рет қаралды 541 М.
Chebyshev's Inequality ... Made Easy!
9:46
Learn Statistics with Brian
Рет қаралды 10 М.
黑天使遇到什么了?#short #angel #clown
00:34
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН